Comments by "Margaret Stutts" (@margaretstutts4362) on "'WHY NOW?': Whitaker wants AG Garland to explain himself after Hunter probe latest" video.

  1. Trump asked for them to throw out illegal ballots. Asking is not telling. It’s not a crime.
    1
  2. There are no limits on free speech unless you yell fire in a crowded theater. The first amendment is more broad than she seems to think.
    1
  3.  @d.h.jefferies2191  no. There are not. Are you an attorney?
    1
  4.  @d.h.jefferies2191  no. That’s defamation. You can say it but would be lying. Truth is the defense to that. I didn’t say speech sometimes has consequences. But limiting Trumps speech is unacceptable and unconstitutional. There’s also a federal law that makes censorship of a presidential candidate illegal. He made a speech. Saying peacefully and patriotically march to the capitol and the idiotic people who attacked the cops did that before Trump finished speaking. He is not responsible for other people’s actions.
    1
  5.  @d.h.jefferies2191  you can’t slur me. What local paper? 🤣🤣🤣🤣😟
    1
  6.  @d.h.jefferies2191  go to hades with the threats. I will not back down.
    1
  7. This is absurd. It’s a political decision not a legal one. Weiss is the attorney that put together the gun deal for Hunter that included blanket immunity. The Statute of Limitations is running. They are withdrawing the charges in Delaware. The agreement gave him no felony charges. A special counsel was needed but not Weiss!!! He’s violating the regulations by appointing Weiss. It’s supposed to be someone outside the DOJ. And this judge surprised them by looking at the diversion agreement.
    1
  8. These prosecutors are stretching the law to get Trump.
    1