Comments by "Christopher Yoder" (@christopheryoder8292) on "Roland S. Martin" channel.

  1. They are. The Democrat DA violated the law when he threatened the lead investigator's job if he didn't withhold evidence from the Grand Jury.
    3
  2. Then you realize that the pardon had nothing to do with the events at the protest but prosecutorial misconduct (the Democrat DA threatened the job of the lead investigator if he didn't withhold evidence from the Grand Jury).
    2
  3. Maybe if the Democrat DA hadn't threatened the lead investigator's job if he didn't withhold evidence from the Grand Jury then there wouldn't have been a pardon.
    1
  4. To everyone on the video and the comments, maybe y'all should do some research instead of arguing from ignorance.
    1
  5. You want the truth, here it is...the Democrat DA threatened the job of the lead investigator if he didn't withhold evidence from the Grand Jury. That is the reason for the pardon not anything that happened at the protest
    1