Comments by "Voryn Rosethorn" (@vorynrosethorn903) on "How Immigration Changed France Forever (French subtitles available)" video.

  1. It's not really contestable, homogenous societies are much stronger and safer.
    56
  2. There is actually more, but it is suppressed better and has much less political expression. The grooming gangs are a massive issue and much of the working class personally know victims, likewise many of the imported ethnic groups are irreconcilable. If liberally applied central repression by the courts and police lets up for a second or the government gives and impression of weakness a lot of groups will kick off, and unlike in France it will go all the way. The hatred is tangible and real, the community behind the grooming while well organised has made intractable enemies of every group other than the urban liberals, when central authority starts waining (which it will, it has burnt all legitimacy, justification, good will and loyalty, and is morally moribund and financially insolvent) then matters will likely be shifted into military organisation, alliance structures and tribal loyalties. On a wider level the solutions looked at by young people basically split, women wanting bureaucratic oligarchy and men wanting a Franco, I have to doubt the viability of either given the severe lack of competence within our institutions. Whatever happens however there will be severe ethnic conflict. By holding the lid on a boiling pot all the political class is doing is guaranteeing an explosion of extreme resentment, grievance and vendetta.
    43
  3.  @DeoVindice999  There are no heterogeneous states in africa, africa is tribal and incredibly ethnically diverse.
    28
  4. That is only possible in a high trust universalisitic society. We will have to go back to clan structures to have protection in numbers, shared economic power (I mean go luck buying a house or getting a job without pooling resources and influence) and shelter for our women.
    19
  5. Apostate.
    13
  6. He's getting it from the Frenchman he cited, and yeah it's pretty wrong, inheritance laws and family structure shifted over time and was different in different classes and ethnic groups. Very often it was explicit laws rather than social traditions that shaped them. For example Tsarist Russia has very extensive laws around personal and family honour as well as succession and practically everything else, likewise they had many groups who did things differently, or didn't care about the law unless they were made to, usually they had their own legal structures. In Britain the Nobility continued Norman attitudes but the rest of the population was much more mixed. It's like trying to use latitude to predict urbanisation, maybe there's a correlation but it's basically a fluke, other factors lead to it happening.
    4
  7. Also the Irish were made to split lands between sons by law, a cause of the famine, the whole thing is pretty wrong. It seems like the theory came before the categorisation.
    2
  8. It was the first European nation with demographic problems, firm proof that they are caused by liberal values.
    2
  9. Almost certainly, but it won't be public policy unless 4chan storms the legislative body, the future will merely be inherited by those who have children, and they won't practice female emancipation.
    1
  10. There isn't much of a distinction, black nationalists hate all white people, likewise with progressivism you are basically dealing with a form of national socialism targeted at whites (though amusingly the poor old Jews still aren't out of the crosshairs as these people categorise them as white). An enemy is an enemy whether they have you on the first or second course.
    1