Comments by "Voryn Rosethorn" (@vorynrosethorn903) on "Why does Hitler say he’s a Christian in his ‘First’ Speech?" video.

  1. I'm starting to find this tiring, your lack of critical evaluation of your assumptions means that you are getting deeper and deeper into false ones. It seems like self-reflection is not a very strong skill, but it is vital for research purposes. Unfortunately I doubt you will course correct at all unless you yourself come to the realisation that you have been misinterpreting a considerable amount due to knowledge deficiencies colliding with confirmation bias. I'm pretty sceptical about academia myself, but you do need to consult with the academic literature a whole lot more, as your misconceptions are escalating wildly.
    8
  2. This is a flawed understanding. The traditional denominational position is that Jesus was the messiah of Judaism and the faith continued through him, those who rejected him apostastised and thus the Church is Israel. The resulting relations between Jews and Christians was thus never very good, but once Jews started to convert to Catholicism in the late middle ages they brought a knowledge of Hebrew and revelations about the development of Jewish theology since the first century which deteriorated relations even further. Early protestants also existed in this context, but over time they needed allies and had major theological innovations which led into stuff like thinking that the English were a lost Jewish tribe or that the reestablishment of Israel would fulfil doomsday prophecy. This is not to mention the enlightenment and the rise of atheistic and pluralistic values among western elites. The Catholics have radically softened their stance since Vatican II, the Orthodox are as hostile as ever, indeed they might be more so now than ever given the events of the 20th century, especially in Russia, and the influx of Zoomer Anglo converts.
    6
  3. Read Rousseau, the utopia they want does not hard ethnic groups, it does not have social groups, it does not have groups. Socialism is about moving towards a utopia in which society is totally destroyed along with property and man returns to a state of nature in which he is free from all social bonds and relationships. This is a big competent of the ideology and it's surprising you don't know about it, many libertarians have written about it, along with others both on the right and left. Rousseau lays it out first, but most of the other figures vital to the formation of socialist ideology were explicitly running with that goal, much of the ideology you are talking about is merely part of their debate about the means to bring such a state about. Some socialists have as part of that taken reactionary social positions, but only because they thought that the actions they opposed risked capsizing what had been built up to that point.
    2