Comments by "Voryn Rosethorn" (@vorynrosethorn903) on "Lotuseaters Dot Com" channel.

  1. This is very blackpilling, a justification of a catastrophically failing system. My Grandparents married at 20, my parents at 30, only one person I know is getting married. You can equivocate all you want, and I agree that the manosphere tends towards the demented, but we are facing a real social and moral crisis, we need radical change based on proven models (e.g. Return to tradition), not a complacent slide into more of the same values ripping our civilisation to sorry tatters.
    105
  2. This is important, upload the whole interview free.
    96
  3. If Carl is entering party politics then I'll be right behind him.
    89
  4. Karl Marx was given asylum here, he had been kicked out of Germany twice, the first time in the request of the Tsar of Russia as he liked to cloak his writings as being patriotic by going on about the Russians, he was kicked out of France on the request of the King of Prussia and out of Belgium after they got sick of him. The continental intelligence services gave the British transcripts of the socialists in exile in Britain planning the assassination of Queen Victoria at a meeting, but the British never acted on it, or numerous other crimes and disorders they committed. The British establishment being liberal always had sympathies to their more radical brothers, also Marx was incredibly well connected through family ties to very wealthy and influential Jewish families, who he would beg for money from, though he was rabidly anti-Semitic, and to German nobility through his wife, who hated him for the fact of being a lowlife, through he always tried to live like a noble, whatever his actual means (which were considerable but never enough for such a lifestyle as he was workshy to the point of absurdity, ironically actual nobles did work, usually in government, the military or the management of their property, Marx had trouble writing his drivel and was commonly literal decades behind on work he promised), he also hated nobles despite thinking he deserved to live like the worst of them.
    81
  5. Birthrates are largely a reflection of the social infrastructure of said groups. The Amish have 8 children per women, one can't exactly argue that it is due to the great prosperity of pre-industrial economics. When people said money they mean support and security, and despite what they say these largely can't be brought at a price other than the social context they live within. Social atomization causes low birthrates, economics is a secondary factor.
    75
  6. Yeah, a lot of people who are teachers shouldn't really be let near children, I can say that first hand being on an education degree. Most of them don't even like kids in the first place, which was a shock to the system when I got there, also the state of the academic side is hard to put into words, I'm not sure a single scrap of it could be salvaged, or should be. I won't be going into the profession, and I will homeschool as if my life depends on it. It is very sad that so many children are shunted through such a dysfunctional system. It's not like people in the past didn't already know how to educate people and they had to build something like they have.
    50
  7. They have declared war, they just don't know it yet.
    39
  8. With monarchy, church and the sword. In other words that's the base requirement for us to even mount a fight.
    29
  9. I'd say the Spanish were given that rather than pursuing financial interests they were enacting the will of God.
    27
  10. Nothing is terrible unless it is detrimental to our people, simply as.
    25
  11. There are pictures with his niece, the safe for work ones are pretty incriminating and there are supposedly not safe for work ones if people are fine with being put on the sex offenders register for seeing them.
    23
  12. If a lot of zoomers find themselves with military training and organisation then it is a likelihood (as would be that any deployment would be troublesome given that a significant proportion beyond deserting would be liable to defect and thus prove a source of military manpower to the wrong side). In current conditions we aren't organised enough to establish secure communities and economic means, internal social norms nor procreation within any a system of our own, or much at all for that matter. Thus for now our only means are political, and such means are not impressive at all, as power matters, positions that merely imply it are dependent on good faith, which we are short of today. Basically rather than the informational sphere, where things are adequate, we need to form together social and economic organisations capable of doing us service and giving us a powerbase beyond solidarity of opinion.
    22
  13. The majority actually, it was 10% who formed the gang, the other 90% were the customers.
    21
  14. As a Christian he would do well to remember the Christian position on and solutions to these problems.
    20
  15. You should bring AM in as one of the team. That and get Dave Green writing for you.
    20
  16. He's very much out of the norm. Though typically for the well informed zoomer who wasn't much influenced by state education and social influences and instead used the greater availability of knowledge through the internet as though it was the new Gutenberg Press (ironically leading to ideological shift the other way).
    16
  17. Confucianism is highly pro-natal, and as a dogmatic belief system it is much the same as ideology and religion, and certainly held the same social function and political influence. Communism has a bad record in natalism, but as a religion of secular materialism it largely approaches the matter from a utilitarian perspective. Modern progressive liberalism is all about maximising individual freedom and minimising responsibility, social or moral, which it sees as oppression. As such it is pro-choice as they put it, but only in one direction, children are a hiccup in the ideal of humans as totally atomized units.
    16
  18. All dating sucks, bring back courting.
    15
  19. The fact they he doesn't even know enough to differentiate certainly does.
    15
  20. To more than just his country.
    14
  21. 'Ok, the research is true but why do you care.'
    13
  22. The law is on their side and will remain so until you wrestle back the institutions, for issues like this it has long been displayed that the only means of pressure is praxis as the leftists call it, for those who don't know what that entails let's just say that the only one who have been able to overpower their attacks are the Muslim community and areas where groups from the Irish troubles continue to hold strong.
    11
  23. He isn't married he regularly talks about his ex's and display's bad judgment in women to the point where the other's joke about it. Harry's the one who's engaged.
    11
  24. Shame that the sociological movement he kicked off have devolved into the priestly class of Marxism. Also always nice to see Calvin, hope you take him on permanently.
    10
  25. He was a lier, he admitted as much and practically every personal relationship was marred by his pathological dishonesty. We know he lied about his childhood, we don't know about his time as a young man as he was always a dangerous man to call out given his social background and connections, and he was indeed a simple minded brute in many respects, though one doubts he ever acted with anything less than utter arrogance and contempt for all those around him, given his lack of personal discipline or decency it is extremely unlikely he was a.good soldier but he most likely was aggressive, though at a certain point on must consider a man rabid rather than brave.
    10
  26. Take your meds.
    8
  27. Many real life pirates were jacobite monarchists ironically.
    8
  28. That depends on how you categorise evidence, for believers and certain philosophers the existence of the universe and object laws of reality is proof itself. To atheists even God himself revealing himself to them would just lead into the plot of Youjo Senki.
    8
  29. Small problem, she's also human. Seriously a lot of this stuff is covered by the bible, start out there, view it as a society building manual.
    7
  30. You either don't know the first bit of history or are an idealist in the first place in that case.
    7
  31. The feminist to trad woman pipeline should be encouraged. The manosphere is filled with people on the dark triad. But other than that I largely agree, they have a bad liberal infestation, and should probably think about some personnel changes.
    7
  32. The political class have invoked a vendetta with the British people, the Sicilian or Caucasian kind.
    7
  33. He's a monarchist like many Christians, that being the absolutist kind.
    7
  34. In case you are wondering this is where the western belief in objective logic comes from. God had to have created a logical consistent universe for him to be able to break it's rules with miracles. There have to be rules for them to be broken.
    6
  35. There are several possibilities, both Godwinson and Edward had considerable Norman connections and it is likely the Godwinson was being held until he made a oath of some sort, which during the time men were very much held to. The detail of importance then comes to the Norman claim to have snuck Christian relics into the giving of the oath, which would thereby turn the affair from one of personal conscious and plausible deniability to a manner of one's salvation in the next life as God would know the contents and fact of any oath. Given that William got the blessing of the pope it must be either that he was very shrewd (which it should be noted most Normans were) or honest in his grievance. I think it is very likely that their was an oath, given that they likely wouldn't have released him otherwise, and the tricking of the oathgiver is a very Norman thing to do. But the contents of the oath is another matter and it wouldn't be surprising at all if it was somewhat less forthright than the Normans claimed so long as the spirit of thing could be justifiably claimed to be near. Godwinson probably also knew that there would be no great recounting of the circumstances if he won.
    6
  36. Scotland is part of Britain, I agree that non-ethnic brits should not be able to buy land or businesses here, but Scotland is part of the country and England has plenty of Scottish descendened people who might want to move back up. Additionally much of the rural economy only survived industrialisation through the purchase of peerages in Scotland off of the impoverished local nobility after the clearances failed to clear up their financial problems. Scottish land, despite a lack of intrinsic value went for fortunes due to romantic associations, and thus many villages and towns facing difficult times during the industrial revolution survived. While it would be preferable to repopulate the highlands further restrictions of the use of land would not be positive, and it's not like Scotland has the native population growth to put land to use much anyway. If monks are going to put up monasteries then that is better than things remaining derelict.
    6
  37. I mean that's the stereotype, much to the frustration of academic historians.
    6
  38. Blood, Sweat and Arrogance: And myths of Churchhill's war. By Gordon Corrigan. Read it. This was painful. Also Ed Dutton has a lot to say about Churchill, he wrote a book about his childhood, why not ask him.
    6
  39. In the full version he reveals a lot of evidence of direct Labour party involvement with these groups. He also explains that people should write to their councillors and ask for an extraordinary session in order to condemn the recent government vote, that one will be called with only a handful of counsellors in support, that the GB news team will make itself present for any such session and thus that even if it is voted down those who do so will have it on their record, and it can be used to campaign against them.
    6
  40. You made a baseless, generalised and seemingly paranoid claim, obviously there is no point directly trying to refute something unhinged.
    5
  41. Very easy to find women in church, just not under 70 and unmarried.
    5
  42. He has for a long time been the main guy reaching out and forming connections, it helps that he has a mainstream presence and can bring in people who aren't of our political background. In short he is the one organising them and he doesn't scare normes.
    5
  43. And for the British elite it was Tuesday.
    5
  44. He will be in person for the first time at the Scyldings event as a guest speaker, but if he is still shy I suppose they can stick him behind a Victorian dressing screen.
    5
  45. It's Calvinist, just the Scottish version.
    5
  46. Strangely no, the thing is that basically all priestly classes across history have argued that reality is up to the whims of fickle gods and only their interpretation with give one a guide of how to act, therefore you should hold them in the highest esteem and placate them with wealth. Islam was far along enough as a civilisation that this argument was made using the existence of atoms (God continually recreates the atoms of every moment of existence, his will is absolute and everything is at his will, therefore stop focusing on secular science and support religious learning), I have a feeling that certain intellectual trends in the west are trending the same, theories of historical determinism also flirt with it to a degree. The Christians are very strange in not following this trend, though they are utterly bizarre in numerous ways compared to basically any other civilisation, ironically the results of this were taken for granted by much of the enlightenment and then universalised as the basis of humanism. That element is largely what is being talked about by Carl, whatifalthis and the historian Tom Holland of all people (in his book Dominion).
    4
  47. He did, you were just born two thousand years late.
    4
  48. Seconded, but in Britain, homeschool as if your life depends on it, because your children's lives do. Even the private schools are only tolerable for a well put together and strong minded boy, it's a terrible influence on girls.
    4
  49. Very dodgy that the lotus eaters let this be published on their platform, no matter what one thinks of the advice there is a reasonable chance that viewers will make financial decisions they would be wiser not to because of this. The problem with beginners entering the market in the first place is that they put all in on black, it doesn't matter if you give them the terms and conditions may apply spiel, it's exceptionally questionable.
    4
  50.  @willie2761  Quite, but that just leaves us with the original problem, we are ruled by those who have revoked any right to rule with their actions. Nothing is going to be done through existing system unless they can be taken and held by us. We have no obligation to play to the rules set out to trap us.
    4
  51. Would you prefer if you had been offered puppies and rainbows. Grow up and take a look around you.
    4
  52. Bishops yes, though many of them are women and thus is schism with apostolic succession, the clergy are less sure as the Christian ones tend to keep a low profile. He is however mostly in line with Christian dogma while much of the Church of England is openly heretical even by the lower standards of Protestantism.
    4
  53. There is a good deal of public sentiment but it isn't very directed as it seems like a lot of people don't have the words or concepts to explain what they are feeling. There is incredible power to be harnessed but no one to harness it. The people with the vision and organisation to manage power after all despise the acknowledgment of a power other than themselves.
    4
  54. I said getting married for a reason, despite what this guy say sleeping with a girl is eminently achievable, the issue is relationships lasting beyond a couple of years and producing children, it works out for some people but not for most. I know plenty of guy's who'd be considered 'chads' but they tend to be starved of affection, to a certain extent it's their own fault for not settling with the single mothers willing to actually have the sort of relationship they want, but really even the bounds of the conversation around stuff like this shows how fucked it is. You can only talk to so many deeply unhappy people before you realise that things need to change on a very fundamental level. It is imperative for people of our background and persuasion to have large families and start them young, to do this we need social norms reinforcing and complimenting that goal, a path to help men get to their destination and a place for women to feel valued and secure.
    4
  55. I've always been right wing, and have only got more so over time. Multiculturalism was very obviously wrong as I went to a multiracial primary school and it was basically a caste system (Pakistanis at the top, then English working class, then blacks). Liberal morality always seemed to me to be outright evil, with little care for where 'freedom' actually led people or feeling of responsibility towards putting them in a direction good for them. Monarchism and Imperialism were also there from before I could walk, I grew up with a lot of nods to our imperial history still around and it was pretty clear that I was represented by the Queen, and not the government, though I only found out a couple of years into primary school that we weren't part of America and didn't use dollars. The normie parts were thinking the Tories were like me or that liberals are honest in their narratives. Also tribal thinking has taken some getting used to, but is necessary, I found that my family like many lost kin to decolonisation. I got confirmed as Christian in 2018, and a lot of my focus since then has been theology and philosophy in order to understand the root of our problem. But yeah, I loathed Blair and Labour even as a child, as one born during his rule, and really it has been a process of discovery rather than any change in mindset or fundamental values. We are tied by duties and obligations as, of and to the people that we are, to do right by them under God is our meaning, it's really quite simple once you get beyond liberal ideological obfuscation and the perverse values of the liberal society.
    4
  56. The vampire hunter should have had his confidence in science destroyed, and the esoterism should have been mocked, the conclusion needed to be in line with the folkmyth, the truest danger to the vampire should have been monastics, spiritual warriors. Likewise any sacrifice should have been part of Christian allegory rather than anything modernist. Unfortunately the lack of grounding within a historical tradition and the realisation of its perspective is a break from form. The other movies are all excellent, if requiring a rather more of a taste for art than I have and historical knowledge that I have but many won't, that said these are the sorts of movies to inspire a love of one and a hunger for the other. There are many excellent films he could make, this would not have been a pick of mine, but it clearly has personal meaning. Same with the lighthouse. I wonder if the questionable elements are penance, the Northman did not go over well with Hollywood given who it depicted and with how well.
    4
  57. Liberalism as an ideological force, managerial capitalism as a system and the university educated left as a class. Getting more into the weeds than that leaves enemies behind you.
    4
  58. There is a likelihood that he is on thin ice for depicting the Norse and doing a good job of it, you can read between the lines of the reception to the film. This is likely a concession as prior films could easily frame him as a western traditionalist filmmaker a and put an end to his career.
    4
  59. It's certainly the case with dade and some of the historical stuff, he is by far the worse with research. Some of the others have weaknesses but none as big, or at the very least they are wish enough not to expose them.
    3
  60. This one is about an hour 20 in total, and it is excellent in terms of historical contexulisation.
    3
  61. No, the English rights and liberties are, rights and liberties given under the power of a monarch and degraded under the rule for democratic tyranny. How many of our 'liberal' rights have at this point been left to us by parliament, the liberal enshriner of these rights who's authority is predicated on guarding them. It is very clear that liberalism is as a political system the enemy of its own intentions and justifications. The English liberties are important, but as such they must be protected from the power of legislative bodies, if they are natural (and thus given by God) then the responsibly for protecting them must be in the hand of God's anointed servant set to rule over the people in his name, the King.
    3
  62. I hope you have him back soon.
    3
  63. We should remember that Christianity is very masculine (God is the divine patriarch, Jesus the son, and church leadership is to be male) as such actively including women, especially representing the great ideal of motherhood is very important. Personally I'm also fairly orthodox theologically (Protestantism was I think a mistake, being the start of this future we live in in a lot of ways) but I think we should as western Christians retain the western rite.
    3
  64. He's born here, raised here and of mixed British blood. As you can hear his Christianity makes him more British than the whole elite and many average folks mislead into godlessness.
    3
  65. The information is very misleading as neither of them know what they are talking about, their is a lot of mixing up of what very much different groups believe.
    3
  66. Courting is facilitated and supervised by families, individual men and women have proven themselves to have rather bad judgement in partners. Ultimately the economic situation demands going back to raising your kids with your parents help and looking after them in old age. Households must once again we large and communities must be proactive in moral policing and gatekeeping. The shift in norms must be explicitly Christian, and give plenty of room for the natural prestige games of women. To be frank women are not men, they are components of society, their individual agency is voluntarily limited within wider social norms and trends. What men want is purpose, what women want is place, if you want women to make the first move get used to waiting.
    3
  67. You need underpinning beliefs in something, I don't believe isn't a good foundation and makes it easy for other belief systems to move in, all the need to win over the atheist stance is to deconstruct the assumption of logic, in other words post-modernism bypasses atheist assumptions on the way to instituting communism. Even without that atheism is a negative system, it unmoors the moral system from it's foundational logic and allows it to drift wherever it will. Basically it creates a power vacuum and then is upset when someone fills it and kicks them to the curb. It is unsurprising that ideologies absolutely dominate in atheist systems, because they are just religions without God.
    3
  68. I would recommend saying that under videos which don't support that sentiment in the most hamfisted way so that it doesn't look like your problem is that you just don't know anything about religion. I recommend the channel ready to harvest as it's both highly educational and non-partisan.
    3
  69. Our enrichers seem to like a nice machete, if you've seen them with them they have to be somewhat careful as they are short and don't have guards. If you are a native a sword might be a wise purchase, they are generally long and do have a guard to protect your hand, just an idea.
    3
  70. Except for the fact that the whole validity of Stockholm syndrome has been considerably undermined. In truth they lived in a time where the whole social structure relied on honouring of one's word and an oath having been extracted (in a church and over holy relics, which meant that the word was then bound up with the fate of the immortal soul) it was thereby judged that he could be trusted to keep by it, with a promise of some sort most likely being the aim from the first.
    3
  71. Where may I ask..........down the back of the sofa? Too many people talking about these issues seem never to have heard the idiom of leading a horse to water. We have a good deal more work to get to in order to put things right than just making an effort in and of itself.
    3
  72. Both are good, but if you don't have the face you might as well go with the body. Other than that develop your personality and dress well. I recommend going to church and building up positive habits like politeness and humility, gain competence and then confidence in the things you care about and put yourself out there in the local community, even if they are mostly older they'll know the type of girls who feel like you do about the modern dating scene and if they like you they'll give to a support network in helping things work out, the pre-boomer generation is full of lovely people and those nice enough to actually bother with them tend to be as well.
    3
  73. That is a minority position, so minority that we all know it was an American church in the non-conformist tradition. Pretty much all actual Christian's have a place for Christian ritual even if they have a questionable stance towards it depending on perspective. Unfortunately the non-conformist protestants tend to take personal interpretation to the extreme.
    3
  74. Fair point, but the same applies on the other side, you can and will see believers change the framing of what is considered proof to argue the strongest atheist points, the issue is that the whole argument is actually being controlled by the interpretation of its bounds on both sides. For example both atheists and Christians with use concepts of truth and logic to argue things as they both believe in them, post-modernists will just claim it is subjective and bypass much the foundations of the debate, you see the same with Christians and atheists constantly rubbishing each other based on their own interpretation of objective morality. The debates are often meaningless as they don't touch on the points of diversion but the manifestation of them.
    3
  75. Cashpoints are also becoming increasingly rare.
    3
  76. Not if the person explaining them doesn't understand them no. A lot of what they are saying is a garbled mess and I'm by no means a theologian.
    3
  77. You might want to put a comment saying that and pin it, most people won't check the description. I'd edit my comment but I'm on kindle and they don't allow you to do it.
    3
  78. We have several people who knew him. Also they are constantly studying ancient bible's to check across translations. Look it up if interested, it's a whole scholarly field.
    3
  79. I completely missed this controversy, but then I know full well that Marxist historians are lying scum and that you should never listen to them.
    3
  80. How then was life created out of nothing, or matter, or the whole of creation. How did things start moving without a mover.
    3
  81. Yes, it's time to look back to God.
    3
  82. Hopefully there will be a compendium at some point.
    3
  83. One is not the dogma of the other but yeah the two tend to be intimately connected as life is hard and without wider purpose it is very easy to repurpose atheist logic into nihilism or to fall into it. But there are non-atheist belief systems which are also very vulnerable to nihilism, and some constructed out of it.
    2
  84. Then enjoy the lack of a community.
    2
  85. You can read the church fathers and men like Saint Augustine and Thomas Aquinas and see if you spot that, the church for sure had plenty of corrupt priests in their time, like any human organisation, but those people tended to go after the political positions rather than renounce worldly possessions and become a theologian in a monastery somewhere. As said loads of what the church did was unprecedented and didn't and doesn't make sense from a secular point of view, but the results are very deeply built into the society that Christendom became and that we live in, what we are learning now is that without those foundations many of the things westerners value start to drift away as the justification not only no longer exists but isn't even understood.
    2
  86. Dade, stop associating a mad cult with general Christian beliefs, the 7th day Adventists are heretical let alone these people. You really need someone with better subject knowledge on your bits to stop you mouthing off about things you know nothing about and only expose your ignorance of. Seriously this sort of topic needs someone like Carl to stop the whole thing going off the rails and add in some perspective. Seriously think things through a little more, the whole point of the lotus eaters in intelligence development, that doesn't work if you treat it like an American radio commentator and give the same level of insight.
    2
  87. If I wanted to pull I literally could have been drowning in women for the last decade, but I make it quite clear I'm only interested in something serious and I've had a 0% success rate on them taking me up on the offer. The problem isn't effort, it is societal values. No doubt I'll be a catch when I'm thirty five and all these degenerates start fearing the consequences of their actions. Honestly it makes me want to move country, I don't want my children to be infected with this culture, problem is where's better.
    2
  88. The church is split and he was meaning a reunification of the church into a single body, not subsumeing separate religions with irreconcilable theology and a long history of violent conflict. The Jews can be tolerated (though they now have their own ethno-state) but Muslims and Christian's historically communicate through the sword and subjugation or not at all.
    2
  89. Don't give them tech (including TV) or send them into mass education.
    2
  90.  @DraftingandCrafting  yes it is
    2
  91. It is also a good deal of congestion and higher costs of it wasn't that rail companies are woefully mismanaged and somehow manage to rival fuel prices. The more and cheaper forms of transport the better, the cost of lost opportunities is invisible but that doesn't mean it isn't there, transportation cost form a large part of goods costs and it is very likely a great deal of potential growth has been lost through stupid policy.
    2
  92. Yes, God, Monarchy and the Sword.
    2
  93. They just have increased the number of forever liberals in their employ by adding the Greek. Dade has always totally lacked introspection, it was a mistake to couple him with the company yes-man, he can be good if with someone who is more intellectual and willing to call him on his shit or clarify on his behalf but on his own or with someone not like that he can dig himself into a really big hole with the hottakes. Carl is seeing a lot of development, he's just not showing any of it on lotus eaters, look up his recent podcast appearances. All the others are very much their own people and while Harry and Callum are seeing intellectual development most of the rest either aren't visibly or clearly don't have that as a goal, the Greek for instance only seems to be there to try and defend lost ground because he is committed to liberalism and doesn't want the Overton window to move beyond it or change axis.
    2
  94. We have to thoroughly rebuild from the foundations and reclaim from the ashes. The current apparatus is our utter enemy and will happily forgo its original function to spite and inhibit us, we must fundamental rethink our methods as we can't use the logic of the enemy as it is the force animating them and the source of their strength and direction. We must formulate arguments and in cases where we don't have time our only option is to resist with enough force to effect their retreat and reconsolidation, in cases like these echoes of complaint or even outrage over the internet do nothing, physical presence and direct action especially against people higher up the hierarchy who don't think their influence is seen are the only way you can strike terror into them, everyone will rush their hand out if they realise it is in a wasps nest.
    2
  95. I'm fine with a discussion between atheists, if Carl and Harry had done this than it still would not have been as good as it could have been but it very much would have been better, indeed they probably wouldn't have even stirred up this topic because they would have done research in advance.
    2
  96. Feminists no doubt, they serve a different master than God.
    2
  97. Projection much, I said I'd referred to marriage deliberately and then elaborated on what I thought the issues were after that. I don't care about your personal situation, it's insignificant on the wider level of social trends.
    2
  98. Nah, history is linear not circular, things lost are hard to regain and nothing happens unless people work for it.
    2
  99. They were actively malicious.
    2
  100. There is a feminist spiritual allegory in the sacrifice at the end, where there was a Christian one in the original. This is unusual for him and thus certainly intentional.
    2
  101. The idea of the sacred feminine is very much related to feminist interpretations of spirituality, it's pseudo pagan. This was not really constructed until the 70's, so such a framework is very out of time when usually he includes the mythological framework within its own historical and cultural context. The past films earned quite a few Christian fans, the idea of an esoteric blood sacrifice is not appealing, and not going with very obvious period elements such Christian allegory or the power of God against such a unequivocal demonic entity is out of place, and draws attention to what he did instead. It's an arthouse type film so a lot of people are already going to find it grating in pacing and insufficient handholding of the audience in relation to the narrative. The fact that the film is gratuitous (all of his are) in addition to a grim conclusion are noob unfriendly. Same with everything he's done. The issue is he built up a fanbase on our side of things and they expect thematic elements in the story and it's conclusion to be heavily contextual to the existing mythos and historical context he is taking from, they got post-modernism, and they hate post-modernism. There are several possibilities, the northman did not do great financially so he was told to change the formula, the northman was not received well by peers due to the subject and he thought better than to antagonize his meal ticket, or he's only as deep as his source material, which might well be the case, his cinematography is genius but his statements about interpretation tend to be smoothbrained, it is likely however that he was hiding his power levels as regular journalists do not tend to have an intellectual capacity exceeding that of their games journalist counterparts.
    2
  102. She's like 13 btw.
    2
  103. They are all head and shoulders above the GB news lot.
    2
  104. He quite simply doesn't know what he is talking about and hasn't bothered to check. Dade has this habit in all his videos it's just particularly blatant here.
    2
  105. So you support evil, got it. God should treat a poor beggar child and a sadistic pedo who killed them the same in the afterlife, what a warped morality your prefect image of God must be. If you are meaning do you go to hell for things you don't want to observe then that isn't up to anyone but God himself, repentance and the significance of the sin matters as do wider circumstances. Two soldiers might kill in war but one go to hell for enjoying it without remorse while the other is safe for considering it his duty. Likewise looters who steal food may be at risk while those who do so out of genuine desperation are deemed justified. To put it simply you have to be a good person in reality rather than fulfilling the minimum social requirements to look such.
    2
  106. You guys are fundamentally accepting liberal premises in your criticism, God is immoral from the view of a value set built on delusion certainly, but Carl has already deconstructed liberalism so appeals in restrictions on total human freedom or the right to an ideal state of being are going to be confronted as lies.
    2
  107. Oh God, you're a critical theorist. The issue with the left isn't that they betray the revolution it's that they continue along the logical path that their foundations set out for them. To win we need to dig up and expose the foundation's to the light and replace them with our own, but our own are not something that can be half arsed, we must either do the work of coming up with something totally new (something which is in some ways impossible as everything is to some extent defined by it's context, and I will straight out come out and say that it realistically wouldn't be possible anyway as the people of today aren't bright enough, we would just end up with another fascism or communism), the issue is that foundations are all ultimately faith based. Our options in terms of conservative faith structure with a proven record of being able to support a society long term are traditional Catholic (the basis of pre reformation philosophy, e.g. most of the stuff that still holds up) and Orthodox Christianity (for an Imperial system), Islam (has a problem with not believing in objective reality), Confucianism (I would consider too conservative) and perhaps legalism if you tinker with it enough. Protestantism was good for a while but seems to have a problem with killing itself, with the number of branches a better version might come to the fore simply by being the last left standing in an evolutionary struggle against itself.
    2
  108. And what to those groups have in common, a very strong society. The travellers basically avoid entanglement with the state in the first place, they marry under the legal age and don't tell the authorities they have children so they won't have to send them to school or deal with social services. Honestly it's the correct way of going about things, the state is the enemy of society, even in our spheres people still submit themselves to official channels and suffer for it. Social services isn't there to help children, it's there to stop their parents from doing so.
    2
  109.  @aaronfire359  In person, and pricy, I won't be there, but many in the space will be. They do have a channel, but they typically take a year or two to upload the related talks.
    2
  110. Good to hear.
    2
  111. Succubi are demons that give one wet dreams, praying for them is beyond being bizarre, endangering one's soul. I don't recommend it, find a wife.
    2
  112. There are women who are most definitely into it, including those with a perverse attraction to criminals and men with a history of violence towards women, it is most likely an adaptive trait from evolution, however I'm not sure if there has ever been proved how genetic it is, there is a possibly that it is a reaction to trauma with the subconscious essentially deciding that you must live in an extremely dangerous context and must put yourself under the protection of the most powerful person you can find irrespective of other personality traits, equally it might just be generic to the least intelligent members of society with the negative correlation of intelligence to fertility making it more pervasive with time, equally it could well be a mixture. There are however most certainly women who do not fit that mold at all and likewise they also don't fit many of the other less reputable traits of women that get talked about as if they cover all, though they are still very beholden to prestige and social factors so in the cultural climate of now mostly conform and only really show themselves in statistics or after becoming mothers and hardening.
    2
  113. One party state that mimics liberalism more than enacts it.
    2
  114. The conservative should cease pursuing the state of affairs they like and instead discover the ideals and values which underpinned that state of affairs coming into being in the first place, as without its foundations the conservative will only serve to facilitate the leftist attack on reality counter to ideals. That would require action and effort instead of air and would need to come as part of a movement towards cultural, moral and religious revival which would not be welcomed by the nihilists and contrarians, we have to recognise that leftism is a religious movement arguing from moral precepts based on theological doctrine, to not have your own moral grounding is effectively to capitulate.
    2
  115. Then why did it decline before wasps did or in Britain itself. Wasps were certainly a unique culture and one that was familial rather than ideological in spread but it's history was the history of England and the English, not a genetically determined one, by your logic we could mix some Celtic genes with some Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and French and product the culmination of hundreds of years of political and social history out of a cloning lab.
    2
  116. And likewise we still have trains, however the point still stands.
    1
  117. On its own not really. The moment they got a sniff of the child abuse they should have come down like a ton of bricks. Also as a non-American and a Christian I think the leader probably should have been burnt sometime before he managed to twist the heresy into making a sex cult. But then I view separation of church and state to be an outright attack on both.
    1
  118. You don't have to be a fascist to seek the betterment of your country, so long as you are not a liberal the solutions write themselves.
    1
  119. As someone who took an education degree this is absolutely the case, most teachers are braindead losers and education is indoctrination into degenerate liberal social attitudes.
    1
  120. That is a very post-modern outlook and does not line up with how the elite generally thought in the past at all, those who weren't profoundly and genuinely religious (which most of them were) didn't care about the lower orders in the first place. If dealing with history you have to deal with the fact that historical elites were just a lot less cynical, and even the ones who were were often cynical in different ways (usually the belief in heresy). For the common man a general moral consensus is much more flexible than indoctrinating children through school and adults TV. It can change with circumstance and obviously the practical reality of Christian morality is not exactly the same in essence to what is being pushed now either.
    1
  121. Hahahahaha, yeah, some piece of paper will save us. Ask the yanks about that. A leadership class who are our own are the only thing which can change things. Our enemies have power over us, it is truly as simple as that.
    1
  122. We can't have justice if they are abroad, keep them here and see them off here. We want crusades, not lip service.
    1
  123.  @elonthebass6870  This is a very very narrow view, Muslims reject the divinity of Jesus Christ, they deny that he died on the Cross, they treat Christians as a subjected people and have persecuted them extensively. The have launched religious war upon religious war against the Christians, they have raided them for slaves and done unspeakable things to their women. The groups are not friends and never will be. Jews have never been in a position of dominance above the Christians and despite that relations have rarely been warm. It doesn't matter if things like proselytizing are forbidden both it and forced conversion are practiced. Read a little into the conduct of the Ottomans towards their Christian subjects.
    1
  124. Divorce is unbiblical, Jesus explicitly forbids it.
    1
  125.  @grimnir8872  The Magna Carta was issued and revoked multiple times, its power is the power of the ratification of the King. In it's political context similar things were signed by Kings across Europe, not for the sake of the population but of the nobility, the reason we didn't end up like Hungary or Poland was that it was later universalised so as to turn if from a wedge for further power by the nobles to a contract between the people and King that as long as he reigned they would have certain rights, by being the enforcer of these rights he became justified in powers needed to enshrine them, this is why parliament took them, they needed right to rule and liberal theory hadn't yet been constructed. Look at how many of those rights remain and tell me they were natural or that the people themselves ensure them. Innate rights are a legal fiction, and the entire structure of the English system is based upon God, it directly comes out of the feudal system. The idea that ancient Germanic traditions are anything important is wrong, most western European monarchies both had parliaments and were Germanic in origin. England was marked not by the standards of Anglo-Saxon rule but of Norman, we were centralised and the institutions were subservient, this is how we punched above our weight historically.
    1
  126. He's been involved in politically organising working class people to take over local government. And he's been targeted by the police and gangs for it.
    1
  127.  @DraftingandCrafting  Just a Clarkson would be sensible to not talk about how great driving fast is in an alcohol anonymous meeting and the bake off should not be on the tv in the liposuction unit of a hospital one has to make a judgement of the advance and how appropriate the topic is. Bitcoin schemes are something to talk about with enthusiasts who have spare capital to put on risky ventures, not normies who are liable to get burned even when undertaking normal investment on their own behalf. These sort of schemes have a bad history and people shilling them to average joes an even worse one. It was extremely ethically questionable that he is using the legitimacy built up by the media company he works at to advocate dubious financial speculation. If he was saying this on twitter I wouldn't complain but just have an expectation that he would grill later publicly for it or cause the happiness of some people privately depending how it went. If one is respectable they will be measured and calculated about what they say, if someone isn't like that their words shouldn't be judged as carrying weight, at least none from them saying it.
    1
  128. Arthouse, personally I think those mean the same thing, but other people have a very different experience. It's almost certainly linked to psychological traits, arty people have fairly specific traits (borderline schizophrenia, overperception, and disordered thinking), and they lap up a lot of existential nonsense.
    1
  129.  @ItsJustRyan89  All current institutions are compromised, this is the problem.
    1
  130. I will warn people that 'Russian bots' backing the regime narrative and with artificial upvotes have been appearing under videos on this topic, they aren't nearly as sophisticated as actual Russian narrative control but they are pretty clearly trying to use the same tactics, or at least the stereotype of said tactics. Thus there are likely to be actual feds (or in this case MI5, military intelligence or whichever NGO is providing such a service) in the comments.
    1
  131. Chem trails didn't work, it was eventually cut because is was a lot of money for a technology with limited application to war. There was a hurricane that changed course back in the seventies during the experiments but it just ends up that all the hurricanes in that area do that. You can use it to stop it from raining on your wedding but as it ends up that wasn't exactly what was hoped.
    1
  132. You are literally biologically designed for paternity, basically all social evolution before the enlightenment was geared towards that as well.
    1
  133. I hope you go over the war in the vendee, of course most of it is not appropriate for YouTube as it's holocaust level stuff. Despite the fact that as an Englishman I can't support the legitimacy of the Bourbon's in holding the French crown it is beyond doubt which side justice laid, more than that the revolutionaries embodied evil to and extent which only certain 20th century ideological groups would rival. We should all pray for the uncounted victims of liberalism.
    1
  134. No it didn't, men who are traditional aren't in women's spaces in the first place and won't approach such women because believe them when they present themselves as easy. You aren't a princess, princes aren't going to come riding in just for you. The right sort of bloke is not going to want a relationship until he knows you, the men who cold approach are obviously just trying their luck, usually with women who are isolated among themselves. The sexual revolution as made the right sort of man very careful as he knows his type of woman is few and far between. There is a reason men are so bitter about it, there are very few respectable women about, mostly just resentful ones who think they can act one way and be treated another. The worst thing is that such women give malicious advice to younger women, and so continue the cycle.
    1
  135. Yes, bring back courting. It has long been a military doctrine to pick the ground you fight on. I don't get why the right always trys to work within failing systems, the left creates new systems even where they aren't needed.
    1
  136. Because God wills it.
    1
  137. I'm always surprised by the low quality of these comment sections, I don't know why people think that regurgitating regime narratives invalidates the very arguments that deconstruct those narratives. This is the Dissident right, why are you here if you swallow BBC level propaganda. Go become libertarians or something, even the most basic, mainstream and low resolution political education is better than watching these without taking any of it in. Frankly even the communists understand the shape of the enemy better than people who are fine with the fading of our race from the world, or the desecration of the soul of our people.
    1
  138. They have one, it just that they put these two stooges in charge of this topic.
    1
  139. They are certainly corrupted but not in the style of the progressive, if you ever get into the progressive loop yourself you'll find they are putting considerable thought into the best approach to subvert the Muslims (Ireland is a shitshow and progressives are cowards so they mostly aren't even bothering with that, they are happy enough that most of the republicans are under their thumb and keep the rest to slurs), they also most certainly did attack, with the nonce level stuff in majority Muslim schools, and then they backed off after Muslim parents did not back down at all, started coordinating and it looked like they were going to be called racist and intolerant of other cultures and religious beliefs. Last I saw they still trying to square the round hole.
    1
  140. Traditional Catholics most likely, the groups who have many children aren't random, thus they tend to be separated from a wider culture which is hostile to such a lifestyle and values.
    1
  141. Both are perversions. One born out of heresy, the other out of evil.
    1
  142.  @SacClass650  The idea that God backs up liberalism, a secular doctrine at odds in many respects with his will. Liberalism has it's own principles that very often lead directly counter to the moral one's of Christianity. Christianity is not at all obsessed with freedom, and thus the secularising tendency of liberalism is necessary for the contradictions to be ironed over. This is why Carl has called it a universal acid before. Only Protestantism can last any time within a liberal system, and even then they will eventually have a choice, be a Christian in a liberal system or be a liberal in a church.
    1
  143. Depends if they are on the pill.
    1
  144. All Eurasian cultures were deeply patriarchal as patriarchal clans were the basic social structure of their common ancestors. That's why the Romans were shocked. As for it it happened, well their descendants are the Welsh so it's plausible.
    1
  145. @ Duke Nukem forever was a beautiful mess of a game.
    1
  146. Their have been plenty much blacker and the Normans had more than enough impact of the character of the English that terms like Anglo-Norman could be considered true of the medieval English and all the history after is in their shadow, especially the gallantry, adventurism and lofty ambition (particularly in regards to foreign land with wealth but little valour).
    1
  147. Opposite for me, it's made me want to have a very large family (dozen at least, though being close with a family of ten has likely skewed my perspective) and I always get told I should work with children. A decent women is indeed like a unicorn with wings unfortunately, and it's near as hard to find any of my generation at all who like kids let alone want any.
    1
  148. We shall act in peace or war, liberalism is not sacred to us, the patrimony of our children is.
    1
  149. It's fine for you, also the profile pic checks out. But whatever I have no cause for squabble with Jews so long as they take up none with me.
    1
  150. Japan has been having serious social issues recently, mostly with the importation of western ideas, it's not as bad yet but that is likely to change within a decade or two. Don't send your kids to school, the childlessness is to do with values and they mainly come from education and media.
    1
  151. Enough of them got shot that people stopped thinking it was a good idea.
    1
  152. To where.
    1
  153. If you read into a lot of civil wars you will know the answer is basically no. And that conjectures to the opposite are largely exercises in selfcomfort. The sort of disembodied popular anger we are looking at is a source of revolts, not revolutions, and given the psychological conception as to the acceptable gambit of behaviour even said revolts shall be rather tepid and likely not lead to any process of escalation unless they receive leadership in place of commentary from our sphere, but the consequences of such a decision would be real, and thus too high a price for most.
    1
  154. I listened to it, he's new to it, and now that he's broken out of normalcy bias is overperceiving like most of us do at that point. His theories about urban decline mostly apply to failed or failing states, but lawlessness is quite distinct from civil war, few crime groups have any interest in waging one. Recent scholarship on civil wars has been very clear that even in the best of circumstances (which are exceedingly rare, and nothing like what we have) to have a revolution there must be an elite, a funding structure and constituency to draw from.
    1
  155. Lol.
    1
  156. On one side the problem is that they lack power and the organisation to take it, on the other boomers are the main voting block and are practically fused to the television and other sources of regime narratives.
    1
  157. We still need a party apparatus, candidates in each seat and a campaign though. I would say that the first step to a party apparatus would be to set up real local communities of our type who can meet within sympathetic Church's (a building common to every part of the country, and less likely to be a hostile environment). These groups can then form the core of campaigning, and can select candidates to run, we then try and take over councils and the government with the aim of revolutionary transformation of this country. We need some base layer of organisation in order to do very much at all. Possibly we can also start dabbling in other things, like housing for members, courtship and the promotion of large families. Unfortunately we don't have much funding, are disunified and have far too many contrarians who don't want anything to happen as they are just around for the fight. The faster things are set up the less time our enemies have to cement their destruction of our nation and civilisation.
    1
  158. That doesn't mean total opposition to democracy, they tend to be highly involved in local democracy movements, but they do believe in a divinely ordained monarch forging together a realm of disparate and largely autonomous communities, there is a reason there is a lot of libertarian crossover. Also given the current political circumstances it is one of the few theoretical possible salvations, I just don't believe that King Charles fundamentally has the personal character to secure the support of the military, disband parliament, purge corrupt institutions, rejuvenate the church and rule through personal strength. But unlike a lot of other right wing pipe dreams the ingredients for it happening do actually exist even if them ever being mixed together is highly implausible to put it lightly.
    1
  159.  @Nick-io9uk  I am not a libertarian, that is the only clarification I think my comment needs, a weapon has no will but you should avoid those pointed at you.
    1
  160. Quite.
    1
  161. There has been increasing pressure on and media groundwork for changing this, the Amish are probably going to be in the eye of sauron for a while, it will be a painful time for them and will be intended to break them as a people (because of what wider people they come from) with prospects (e.g. replacement birthrates and a form of Christian morality).
    1
  162. All beer tastes like soup, no point on a tierlist.
    1
  163. Reform have displayed that they are boomer neo-cons angry at the Tories for going neo-lib, they fundamentally don't have loyalties where they are required, not just for political feasibility but in order to have any right to power at all. It's clear that the boomers can't lead, they must follow on from the work of better people, but ultimately they are only worth courting for their funds, they themselves will be gone soon and their votes along with them. The future is one of iron and blood, not of traitors and the dupes even of fools.
    1
  164. Tinned Cat, okay, that she thinks if it existed it would be acceptable to eat suggests she should be deported to China, or France.
    1
  165. Not really, evil begets evil, liberalism is working fine, if anything better as it was meant to concentrate power in the hands of politicians and it has done so. All the rest is iceing that has by now been eaten by the cake.
    1
  166. As said on your own channel lets start buying land and building yurts (which are cheap and don't need planning) so that we can start community building and have affordable housing for the young so that they can raise large families.
    1