Comments by "Marvin Fine" (@torontovoice1) on "How to Leave the USA in Five Steps" video.
-
10
-
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@thinkforyourself9334 a lot of it depends on what you do. If you do something that requires you to be present, like the majority of people, you can't be a nomad. How could you be a nomad as a cook, hairdresser, warehouseman, factory worker, fireman a policeman, and the list goes on it's only those select few people that have portable jobs like computer programmers etc have the ability to go offshore and not pay tax, or not as much tax. But when you look at what country you can go to, the list is slim unless you want to go to a corrupt third world country. What's the good of them if your life is insecure. You think Mexico is dangerous? Well, there are many countries that are much worse! And God forbid what are you going to do when you get sick. You might want to look at the Newsweek top 100 hospital list. None of the countries in the top 100 are particularly low in tax. Canada the United States western Europe, Israel, Switzerland etc. You Don't see Bangladesh on the list. And if you're not making a lot of money, you're hardly paying any tax! A lot of people are looking at going to a country which is the opposite high tax country where they have good social program and you have a much shorter work week. It all depends where you are at in life. But the concepts that many people talk about on this channel are for most people a dream because they are not practical. I'd like to hear your thoughts
2
-
2
-
@Matt Karacic most countries don't tax foreigners, and many countries don't have taxes on foreign income at all even for residents. And other countries have other tax benefits. Some countries have no capital gains tax like Switzerland. No country is perfect. You have to look at what you do, and where you want to be. You also have to look at how much money you have, how much skills you have, and who will have you or what passport you have. Then you can make the best decision that works for you. It's like going and sifting through a lot of information. Always remember this though, think of a bucket of water with a lot of holes in it. If you have a corrupt country, they can't collect much taxes. No taxes means no infrastructure, no roads no rules no regulations no justice system and the list goes on. Of course if you're in a dictatorship it's a whole different kettle of fish. So you have to figure out which one works for you. There's no perfect place call me it doesn't exist. It's either too expensive, too cold, to corrupt, can't speak the language, and the list goes on
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@qjtvaddict I could understand your frustration, but wars are not stupid. Unfortunately, there are dictators around the world that are trying to monopolize other countries and the human rights of some countries is quite abysmal. So it's the duty of the United States to keep balance in the world. Wars of course are the last resort. The first resort is generally sanctions. So there's many countries that are on sanction, but they are prepared to live with it because their view is so untenable that they just want to dominate other people and export revolutions. You also have countries like China and Russia which would wreak havoc around the world if they were left unchecked. You recall that the Ukraine was given assurances by the United States that if they give up their nuclear arsenal, the United States would protect them. Well that didn't work out did it? If they would have kept their nuclear weapons, Russia would not have taken over Crimea! Now they're poised on their border threatening the United States to do things that are in their interest under threat of starting a war with Ukraine. Don't forget you also have North Korea which have nuclear weapons but not necessarily the capacity to deliver them at any great distance. These countries want to acquire nuclear weapons so they can threaten other countries and take over land, natural resources etc. So you can see what happened with Iraq for example when they invaded Kuwait. The United States didn't really have any choice but to forcibly remove the Iraqis from the country. They did so primarily because they had an interest in oil. President Trump created a situation in the United States where there was so much oil that not only didn't they need to import any, but they had enough oil to export. Contrast that with 70% imports. And now we all know that oil is highly polluting and unsustainable, but until there's a replacement for it and a viable one, the United States needs a reliable source of oil and cannot depend on the whims of others to maintain their economy and stable inflation. I could go on for the next 50 pages, but I think you get the idea. Ultimately, when technology advances so that electric cars and even driverless cars becomes widely available, and the grid is able to support it, there won't be a need for very much oil. The only thing lacking right now is a viable way of storing electricity, because green energy is not reliable. On Thanksgiving Day when everyone puts a turkey in the oven, the grid has the highest drain. Would people accept rolling blackouts? I think not! Of course many people believe that their taxes are being wasted, whenever you have a budget of that magnitude with people that have diverging views especially those that are different than your own, there's no doubt that you will feel that the money is wasted. And when people feel that way, they look for alternatives. Those alternatives can be moving somewhere else, tax evasion, tax avoidance, cutting back on expenses and the list goes on. There is no country that doesn't waste money because governments are inherently inefficient. And most governments are not interested in what's necessarily good for the people, but rather to be popular. So by doling out funds to those less fortunate instead of incentivizing them to work or create value, you are perpetuating decades of freeloading. The question is not simple, and the answer is even more complex
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@migooknamja I don't think governments around the world, at least in Democratic countries have the legal capacity to mandate someone to take a vaccine. First of all there could be reasons why you can't take it. So that would be the first instance. The second thing is that it's a matter of personal choice. Remember that the vaccine has only received the emergency use authorization, it has not been fully approved. I'm not too concerned about the safety of the vaccine, although there have been some reports of mild reactions to it. The issue is one of efficacy, and whether or not the vaccine is going to continue to be effective against new variants that are coming out. But you know I read reports all the time of people that are in there 30s and 40s and get the virus and have no other pre-existing conditions and succumb to their death. Now is that likely? No, not at all but it happens. So with anything in this world, any medication that you take for example you have to determine a risk reward analysis. Is getting the medication better than not getting it? What are the risks of getting it, and what are the risks of not getting it? And you need to look at real data. So Israel started the vaccine earlier than any other country back in December. So there's more data in this country than any other country in the world. And because everyone's medical record is digital, data scientists are able to extrapolate large amounts of data for various purposes. In fact one of the reasons why Pfizer agreed to provide vaccines here first, was the agreement to provide all the statistical data to them, and the world so that countries and people like yourself can make informed decisions as to whether or not to take the vaccine. It is only when a percentage of the population, and no one knows what that number is, gets vaccinated that herd immunity will be achieved. Moreover it's not only Western countries, but the whole world has to reach a certain level of vaccination. In many countries they have none. One of the challenges with Pfizer and moderna is that the vaccine must be kept at a very low temperature, I believe minus 70 or something, and is only good for 4 or 5 hours after it's thawed. more over the explanation dates or rather short so it's a tough job trying to predict how many to keep in stock and how many you're going to need. They're developing a pill form in this country right now which will be able to be distributed very easily all over the world especially in third world countries where access to refrigeration etc. Is non-existent. This thing will end, eventually it will burn out, but the faster the world gets vaccinated, or the more people that get sick, the faster the world will Beach herd immunity. There is of course also the issue of travel which has been very impacted by this pandemic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think you have to look at the country from a different perspective. There are poor areas, and poor states, which are predominantly democratic, and then there are richer States which are predominantly Republican. As well because of the system of capitalism, there is a tremendous inequity and the wealth of the population. You have an awful lot of poor people and you have a large middle class, and then you have a small select class of ultra high net worth and billionaires. Unfortunately, because of technology, a lot of the wealth has been concentrated by a small number of people which has disadvantaged the largest number of poor people. These people are as you describe. They eat poor quality food which causes obesity. They're not very intelligent, they're mostly uneducated, and there's a lot of illegals in the country which are doing the bulk of the grunt work if I could use that word loosely. So if you were going to make a documentary on the US, you could make the worst or the best, it's your choice. Not everyone lives like the Kardashians, and people that are downtrodden, have a very hard time making ends meet. The medical system is poor for those who are not funded with healthcare, and there are very few social programs because people just don't want to pay for them. Fortunately, there are tremendous opportunities in the US for companies because they have a large group of people whom they can sell their wares to.
1
-
1
-
1