Comments by "Marvin Fine" (@torontovoice1) on "Canadians are Fleeing with their Wealth" video.

  1. 59
  2. 17
  3. 14
  4. 12
  5. 11
  6. 8
  7. 4
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19.  @s.a.m.3575  I don't agree with that. First of all, it wasn't a peaceful protest at all. Secondly, governments have a duty to protect the population, so while they cannot mandate people to get vaccinated, they can impose sanctions as to what people can do and work if they're not vaccinated because they pose a risk on the rest of the population. I think we were all expecting covid to go away, but I don't think it is anytime soon. I know some people are alarmed at taking a vaccine, I was too. But after undergoing it research and speaking with a few immunologists I concluded that the risk of taking it was less than the reward of becoming somewhat protected. They don't last very long. Where I live in Israel, they started much earlier than most countries, and because our health system here is digitized, they were able to compile the all the data on 9 million people as opposed to a small study of 20,000. I don't know how much research you have undertaken on this, and I'm speaking about doing research on reliable sites like looking at double blind studies etc. Each person has to determine what is best for them based on their own particular circumstances, and you also have to as a good samaritan consider the population as a whole and not just your individual circumstance. I think the government's reaction was an overreach, but they were desperate and acted immaturely. This was handled very badly! After they determined that the demonstrations were illegal, anyone who was donating money after that was in effect conspiring to commit a criminal offense with the truckers. So whilel it may appear that the donors we're innocent bystanders, they were in effect enabling these people to continue their unlawful some some would say treasonous threats. Remember their position was we're going to block the border and disrupt the whole city until our demands are met. That is not a demonstration!
    2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41.  @leondxut  well Leon, first of all I think it's a significant overreach. But that said, the government declared that these protests were illegal. So the logic of law would follow that if you are assisting an illegal operation and prolonging it, you're jointly and severally liable. It's no different than any other law where someone assist another person to continue committing a criminal offense. So if the money was not flowing, these people would have left. But they were being paid to protest by supporters who paid them wages and expenses which prolonged the insurrection. There's a lot of dooders out there, so I can certainly see how people could have innocently donated money to their cause. There was a woman who owned a yogurt shop in downtown Ottawa who gave $20 her $50 to buy a can of gas so they could keep warm or propane perhaps. She was on CTV News and I saw the story. But on balance, it was handled very poorly, like a bunch of amateurs. But they should have done is come out in force and break it up. But instead they put leafness on windshields, and threaten the public which is really a pretty bad thing especially when it gives you the feeling that you as an innocent participant could be liable to subjugation and seizure. So it doesn't really bode well with the investment community or with the status of Canada. And you can see that they were not able to organize any kind of demonstration like that South of the border, because the US government would just not allow it.
    1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47.  @tuk25  listen, the Canadian government freezes bank accounts all the time. CRA does not need a court order to do it, it's pretty common and thousands of people get their bank accounts Frozen. There's probably a bunch of other things that you probably don't know. They can also deny you a passport under certain circumstances. And Canada is not alone, the United States is even more brutal. The only difference here is that no government that have ever threatened to freeze bank accounts of unruly protesters, if I could use that expression lightly. I think it's unprecedented, and even if no accounts were frozen, just the threat of freezing the accounts is enough to give people pause for concern. Statistically, most Canadians agree with what the government did. They are involved in constant polling, and they know exactly what their electorate likes and dislikes. After causing an extreme disruption in Ottawa and blocking the border affecting the lives of tens of thousands of people rather than use Force which is what most governments would do, they threatened economic sanctions solely against people that were involved in doing it, and to a lesser extent, those that were enabling them such as people donating money to their cause. Yes, it's a very extreme step for any democracy to do, but there is even more precedence for that which was the war measures act that his father, Pierre enacted when a cabinet minister named pierre Porte was kidnapped. Under the war measures act, people can be arbitrarily arrested detained and a whole host of other things, so what he enacted the emergency procedures act I think it's called who was substantially short of the war measures act. In my opinion, it was over arching, heavy-handed, and devoid of sensibility. But, life got back to normal as a result with a minimal amount of disruption. But I think if you look at the whole thing in context, it wasn't completely unreasonable
    1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1