Youtube comments of John Peric (@johnperic6860).

  1. 1300
  2. 174
  3. 113
  4. 53
  5. 44
  6. 39
  7. 37
  8. 30
  9. 26
  10. 26
  11. 26
  12. 24
  13. 16
  14. 15
  15. 13
  16. 12
  17. 10
  18. 10
  19. 10
  20. 10
  21. 10
  22. 9
  23. 9
  24. 8
  25. 8
  26. 8
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 7
  30.  @TheNobleFive  Faster connections isn't the problem (please read carefully). The US already had 160,000 miles of paved federal highways built by the 1940s, and 260,000 miles of efficient passenger rail built by the 1920s (more than any country on Earth today). Every town in America with over 1000 people had a rail station. Despite these extant means of rapid transport, small towns continued to grow throughout most of the US (granted at a slower pace than cities) until the 1950s. So again, the problem isn't rapid transit, it's how the rapid transit is done. Railways and federal highways were built along existing trails, and took travelers directly to the center of small towns, where they would then get to purchase goods and services from local stores. Hence why Route 66 is often called the main street of America. Fast-forward to the 1950s and the federal highway defense act is passed, which seeks to expand existing highways and reroute them around (rather than through) small towns. Once the new interstates were rerouted away from the downtowns, people of course stopped driving through downtowns, stopped buying goods and services from said towns, and the towns therefore entered a perpetual recession and their residence of course left (especially the young ones). Mainstreet was replaced with the truck stop. A great example of this is Lordsburg, New Mexico. The town was the historic junction between federal highway 80 (the precursor to interstate defense highway 10) and federal highway 70. At its peak before the rerouting in the 1960s, the town had a population of 3,500 and a median income comparable to the national average. The town's population steadily grew until the I-10 reroute (which shifted traffic half a mile away from downtown). Once this happened, Lordsburg's downtown quickly died as travelers stopped coming in. Since then its median income has plummeted to one third the national average and its population has fallen by nearly 40%. This was a direct result if the I-10 reroute. Other towns which haven't been bypassed by defense highways (to save 2 minutes of driving) have typically continued growing in pace with nationwide birthrates (biggest difference being they don't attract foreign migrants).
    7
  31. 7
  32. 6
  33. 6
  34. 6
  35. 6
  36. 6
  37. 6
  38. 6
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 5
  47. 5
  48. 5
  49. 5
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 4
  56. 4
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71.  @CheeseBae  You are confusing technological modernization with modernist (enlightenment) philosophy. The Arts and Crafts movement opposed technological modernization (industrialization); it did not oppose enlightenment philosophy but was rather founded in it. Modernization and modernism are not the same, and your confusion about these two things is what has you confused. Modernism is a liberal enlightenment philosophy applied to art and form. Liberalism is simply the rejection of objectivity in favor of subjectivity and individualism (this was often manifested as anarchism). Conservatism, conversely, is the embrace of objectivity (this is often manifested as upholding authority). The Arts and Crafts and Impressionist movements were founded on the philosophies of humanist-socialist thinkers, such as John Ruskin and William Morris, and Deists, such as JMW Turner. The main tenets of these movements were: - Embrace a more abstract and simple form. - Embrace the capabilities of the individual - Embrace human craftsmanship, especially separate from the divine (e.g., humanism) - Embrace naturalism. It was liberal, enlightenment, and therefore modernist in every sense. John Ruskin, among others, called JMW Turner the Father of Modern Art (which most scholars today agree with). The Arts and Crafts movement laid the foundations for the later Vienna Secessionist movement, Modernista movement, Art Nouveau, Bauhaus, etc. This isn't controversial. In fact, the Modernista movement was also very upfront about its opposition to industrialism and the bourgeois class, similar to the Arts and Crafts (this didn't make it any less modernist, of course).
    4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107.  @MikelosM  Hmm, no, every single day on average has warmed by roughly the same amount (though there's difference between the rate and linearity of the warming between the summer and winter). Summer temperatures have actually risen slower, on average, than winter temperatures, with average summer temperatures only rising about 1.5° since 1950 (this is because summer temperatures in Florida are more impacted by marine air rather than continental air, like in the winter). And no, 2-3°F of warming means on average the entire distribution of temperatures will shift 2-3°F upward, meaning instead of 90° as an extreme, it should be 92-93° (which again, isn't discernable, especially over. 50 year period, especially when year to year temperature changes are highly variable). And according to Florida's state climate summaries (which I can link in another comment, if YouTube permits) the state has seen no discernable trend in the number of days exceeding 95°F in the last 120 years. As for heat indices, I can't find any historical data on that except from Miami, which has seen a warming of 0.54°/decade. Since Florida's precipitation has stayed relatively constant then the average dew point must've increased at a similar rate to temperature trends, particularly during the summer (Florida's wet season), which would correspond to a state wide increase in summer heat indices of around 2° since 1950. And lastly, nowhere in Florida is the sea temperature getting up to 98-100°F. I live 60 miles west of the station where that temperature was recorded (Manatee bay), and our sea temperatures have not exceeded 91° ONCE this entire year, and are currently sitting at a balmy 86°. Further, no buoy surrounding the one in Manatee bay recorded such high temperatures; for instance, Biscayne bay, 5 miles east, was a balmy 85-87° when that 100° water temperature was recorded.
    2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116.  @robertfetrow4612  "And hundreds of millions of Americans who use those interstates to travel and guess what? Most everyone you claimed was displaced most likely used that interstate highway system." And why does that matter? If I blew up your home and replaced it with a McDonald's, the fact you ate at said McDonald's wouldn't make blowing up your home any better. I don't know what kind of reasoning that is. Most of those displaced by the interstates would be communities that would get little use out of them (e.g. rural communities or dense, walkable communities). And it shouldn't go without mentioning that highways literally existed before the interstate. All the defense highways did was add lanes to existing freeways and reroute traffic around small towns rather than through them. That's LITERALLY all they did. Americans, and those who would be displaced, could've just as easily driven our already extant 160,000 miles of paved highways WITHOUT the interstate Defense highways. "It was the greatest advancement in travel in the USA" No, the greatest advancements in travel were: - The Numbered Highway system, which was completed in 1926 with 160,000 miles of paved highways (this includes roads such as Highway 66, Highway 101, and Highway 80). - The National Rail System, which was completed in 1919, with 260,000 miles of railways and a station in every town with over 1000 people. - The National Air transport system (which is the safest and most efficient means of transport today). The Defense Highway Act only added lanes to 1/4 of the highways already built in the Numbered Highway system, destroyed rural and urban communities, and displaced millions of people.
    2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165.  @CheeseBae  "Gaudi did not build Modern architecture, he built in a form of Art Nouveau architecture." So, modernista is not a modernist style? "Prairie school is not Modern architecture, it is an outgrowth of Arts and Crafts." Fascinating, so you mean to tell me the Robbie House is not modernist? How about Organic Architecture, such as Frank Llyod Wright's Taliesin West, which directly stems from his earlier Prarie school? "You need to decide if you're talking about architecture or philosophy" I'm talking about the philosophy behind modern art, including architecture. These are not mutually exclusive terms. "while Art Nouveau and Arts and Crafts were a continuation or an evolution of traditional architecture." No, they were fundamentally different, in respect to their philosophical roots, from traditional architecture. Having vestiges or even some inspiration from the past does not make something traditional. By that logic, "post-modernism" isn't modernist. This is like saying the Pearl Academy of Fashion isn't modernist since it has vestiges of traditional Indian architecture. A swallow does not a summer make - just because vestiges of tradition exist does not mean something is traditional. Arts and crafts, and the subsequent modernist styles, such as Vienna Secessionist, Art Nouveau, Bauhaus, etc., were based on rejecting objective form and the divine in favor of subjective form and naturalism/humanism. That's what separates Arts and Crafts from, say, Queen Anne and other traditional architecture. This is made very clear by the fact that these movements were literally founded by secular socialists, humanists, and naturalists; if you don't know this, then you've done little research on the founders of these styles.
    2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. Good video. Conservatism is not an inherent objection to change and conversely, liberalism isn't an inherent acceptance of change. Liberalism and conservatism are philosophies that can best be summed as the following: Objective collectivism versus subjective individualism. A great example of this is the divide on morals, The conservative position would be that there is an objective and universal moral truth while for liberals one would claim that morality is subjective and up to the individual or culture at hand. Further, there's nothing inherent about cities that makes them more conducive to the other, with one exception... The only argument I can see that cities may be inherently more liberal, especially with respect to the Judeo-Christian heritage of the West, is that cities are wealthier and as people grow in wealth they rely on themselves rather than God for answers. Taking that into consideration, and as you said, cities are bell weathers, they just reflect the trends society will be going towards, be it conservative or liberal. For instance, the culture of Christian Rome was more conservative than the countryside that surrounded it (this is especially visible in the British Isles), or the European Renaissance, which was born in cities and was more conservative than the countryside that surrounded said cities. And lastly, if you purely define liberalism and conservatism by these basic philosophical notions of objectivity versus subjectivity, then I would say 5th century BC Athens or 1st century BC Pompeii was probably more liberal than even the most liberal cities today.
    2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228.  @ronaldsmith6829  "This is another argument that sounds valid on the surface and fails to address the whole issue. The N.H.S. did contribute to the degrading of Small Town America." I didn't say the National Highway System, I said the Federal Interstate Defense Highway system. The original federal highway system was great, with literally no harmful societal side-effects I can think of. It made it so people could safely get across America in a matter of a few days (similar to today) rather than weeks. "However it wasn't the major cause. Yes the N.H.S. did reduce some of the business in small towns, particularly when they were denied an offramp. However what really killed off business in small towns was the growth of Chain Stores like Walmart, Home Depot, etc... Even in the cities, small business is hard put to compete with Chain and Big Box stores. There are studies that have proven Walmart killed every small town and small business within twenty miles everywhere they were built. " No, it definitely was a major cause, even for towns with off-ramps. If a new road diverts traffic from your town, even if there’s an off-ramp, people aren’t going to drive through your town, and if they don’t drive through your town, they can’t see what business is even there and if they can’t see what business is there, they can’t stop to spend their money. Going back to the Lordsburg, NM example, the town didn't begin dying when the closest Walmart was built 80 miles away in 2011, the city began dying the moment the interstate re-route was completed because people began driving past the downtown rather than through it (for obvious reasons). When people stopped driving through downtown THEN chain corporations, such as Mc. Donald’s, Pilot, Hilton, etc., moved in and opened hotels and truck stops. The economies of these small towns along the highways were not sustained by locals but by travelers, and when the interstate re-route was done, it took those travelers away from Lordsburg. This is the case for every small town bypassed by the interstate. Literally, EVERY instance you look at of an interstate by-passing a town’s business district, the town’s business district (and typically the town itself) dies. The rise of major chains in these watering-hole towns is largely an effect of the interstate that only acted as feedback to killing the town. Sorry, if people don’t know your downtown exists, they won’t stop there to use its goods or services.
    1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343.  @CJ_Espinoza  "God or gods* ... scientific community" It does not matter what I or the scientific community believes, God is real regardless. With that said, God is provable, and I didn't provide evidence because... 1.) You didn't explicitly ask. 2.) It would massively distract from another aspect of our conversation, and I left my evidence vague so you can ask questions. You're trying to have two conversations now, we should stick to either one or the other. Since you've made it clear you want to save the issue of objectivity for later, we can focus on the conversation of God. "My point is you cannot... not based in fact" You've made it clear you want to focus on the topic of God, so let's keep this conversation coherent and save this conversation about objectivity for later. So with that said, let's start talking about God! We can start with prophetic evidence. So to begin, can you tell me what event is being described here? "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring? 2O my God, I cry in the daytime, but thou hearest not; and in the night season, and am not silent. 3But thou art holy, O thou that inhabitest the praises of Israel. 4Our fathers trusted in thee: they trusted, and thou didst deliver them. 5They cried unto thee, and were delivered: they trusted in thee, and were not confounded. 6But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people. 7All they that see me laugh me to scorn: they shoot out the lip, they shake the head, saying, 8He trusted on the LORD that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him. 9But thou art he that took me out of the womb: thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mother's breasts. 10I was cast upon thee from the womb: thou art my God from my mother's belly. 11Be not far from me; for trouble is near; for there is none to help. 12Many bulls have compassed me: strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round. 13They gaped upon me with their mouths, as a ravening and a roaring lion. 14I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint: my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels. 15My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws; and thou hast brought me into the dust of death. 16For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet. 17I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me. 18They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture."
    1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. ​ @PJH13  "If he was 17 at the time, I might agree with you." Why does it matter if he was 17 or 40 at the time? That literally has no bearing on whether his heart has changed regarding that. Heck, whether or not he did it a year ago would have no bearing on whether his heart changed regarding that. "It was only a few years ago and he was a fully grown adult." And fully grown adults can have a change of heart. Similar to how you absolutely still do wrong to people yourself, but we both know you can change from that. "It's not a matter for me to forgive someone anyway, it's for their victim." No, it is actually everyone's business to forgive someone, if said person is truly repentful and turned away from the wrong they did. And frankly, you are the one holding the weight of the wrong he's done in the past over his head right now. If he has genuinely had a change of heart and turned away from his abusive behavior then you are absolutely are in the place of needing to forgive him, especially being you're the one holding it against him. "What I am concerned about, is what it tells us about how suited he is for one of the biggest responsibilities in the world." With all due respect, even if he had zero change of heart regarding his abusive behavior in his personal relationships, this would have literally zero bearing on his capacity to be a leader. Sorry to let you down, but if personal wrong-doings was a bearing on one's capacity to lead, then literally every person to ever hold a position in the executive branch in all of US history would be unfit, by your books. That said, if he HAS had a true change of heart and is truly in a different position regarding how women should be treated, e.g. with respect and dignity, why would you hold his past over him and say that his past disqualifies his merits now, even if his heart is where it should be now?
    1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. ​ @CheeseBae  Per the Getty Institute (First source that appears): "The term 'Modern architecture' describes architecture designed and built within the social, artistic, and cultural attitude known as Modernism. It put an emphasis on experimentation, the rejection of predetermined 'rules,' and freedom of expression in art, literature, architecture, and music." Per Wikipedia (The second source that appears): "Frank Lloyd Wright was a highly original and independent American architect who refused to be categorized in any one architectural movement. Like Le Corbusier and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, he had no formal architectural training. From 1887 to 1893 he worked in the Chicago office of Louis Sullivan, who pioneered the first tall steel-frame office buildings in Chicago, and who famously stated "form follows function".[21] Wright set out to break all the traditional rules. He was particularly famous for his Prairie Houses, including the Winslow House in River Forest, Illinois (1893–94); Arthur Heurtley House (1902) and Robie House (1909); sprawling, geometric residences without decoration, with strong horizontal lines which seemed to grow out of the earth, and which echoed the wide flat spaces of the American prairie. His Larkin Building (1904–1906) in Buffalo, New York, Unity Temple (1905) in Oak Park, Illinois and Unity Temple had highly original forms and no connection with historical precedents." There is a Modern movement, more formally Art Moderne, which is a streamlined and futurist movement, including Villa Savoye; however, this is simply an avant-garde movement in the broader modernist movement.
    1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1