Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "SmarterEveryDay" channel.

@remyllebeau77 If we have too powerful of a military, it deters war and simultaneously allows for unmolested global trade. The US Navy maintains open sea lanes in almost every choke point where despots would threaten shipping for their own purposes. This internet and devices we're communicating on are products of US innovation and trade.
43
Absolutely false. The US has been inundated with pro-Soviet, pro-communist, anti-American propaganda for so many decades, people born after 1968 don't even know what pro-American propaganda looks like.
14
Google's behavior in 2016 is one of the most disturbing series of events in modern history.
13
@durg8909 I don't see that. I see everyone recognizing this is a design, not a random system that accidentally arranged into such complexity. If Darwin saw this, it would have blown his mind and his theory would never have been penned. Let go of your religion and accept what you're seeing.
12
As opposed to?
6
Multi-Domain is the evolution of Combined Arms. Combined Arms is still handicapped by internal service myopia. MDO creates seamless interoperability within and in between not only services, but allies. Systems like the F-35 create a common codex for interoperability.
4
 @zperdek A pothole in the road is a degradation of a designed system, which also causes harm to the systems the road was meant for. Your example undermines your argument.
2
Terrorist attacks are normally asymmetric actions agitated by state actors who don't have the ability to openly engage their rivals. We saw a rise in terrorist activity after the Soviet Union was unable to achieve strategic depth into the Levant when Israel chose the US for its main FMS instead of USSR. Also, after Desert Storm and the collapse of the Soviet Union, we saw increased terrorist attacks against the US by the MB, who likely were empowered by China and other hidden hands, similar to the people who agitated the assassins of Archduke Ferdinand II.
2
The US is one of the biggest producers of oil and NG. What countries are we taking oil from as a result of war?
2
First destroy some of the biggest world powers in history, then watch rivals resort to terrorism because they can't fight you in your strengths.
2
@KainYusanagi When flights of Norwegian F-35As, USMC F-35Bs, Dutch F-35As, UK F-35Bs, Australian F-35As, and USAF F-35As head into a modern integrated air defense network, their comms and connectivity are seamless. They all see what each other sees, and know what each other know without ever breaking squelch. Any of them can provide over the horizon targeting for US Navy vessels and their surface-to-surface or surface-to-air missiles.
2
This is probably one of the top 3 channels on youtube. There should be nothing controversial about firearms, which are simply tools that use propellant to launch a projectile. We also use propellant to move pistons within engines and convert that energy into rotational energy for aerodynamic propellers, hydrodynamic impellers, wheels, and electrical generators.
1
A huge problem for our generation is Google's bias, the Russian ownership of Google, the fact Eric Schmidt committed billions to Hillary's campaign years before she announced her candidacy, and that Google held a company leadership lamentation meeting when Hillary lost. I also noticed that comparison photos showing campaign rally turn-out between Hillary's, Trump's, and Bernie's were purged from image search during the campaign season because they were very powerful representations of the drastic differences in average turn-out.
1
Ungregistered User Yes. I've deployed to several of those countries. I'm talking about the wave of Jihadist surrogates directed against Western targets, with Munich 1972 being a decisive tipping point. KGB was training terrorist cells to conduct attacks. After the Iranian revolution, the IRGC began agitating cells to do more and more bombings in Israel and Europe. The Muslim Brotherhood assassinated Sadat in Egypt, then was purged by the Egyptian army. Cell leaders from the Egyptian military spread throughout the world, including to the US. One of them was Ali Mohamed, who helped lay the US network for Mohamed Atta and the 9/11 hijackers.
1
Humans are far more than a pile of cells. Thought exists well outside of neurons, and neuroscience has been very stubborn in the face of advanced imagery of the communication media between organs and systems in the body. Electrochemical connector theory has not held up well with 3D EEG. Something else is going on that can't be explained with existing academic structures.
1
YouTube is owned by Google. Google funded Hillary's campaign with at least $2.1 billion, pledged by Eric Schmidt to John Podesta before Hillary even announced. Google was founded by Larry Page and Sergey Brin (Russian). Larry Page stepped aside when Eric Schmidt came in as CEO, then did PageRank (a search algorithm for Google). Control of content and ideology has been the goal of Google from the start, and when they bought YouTube, it was a dark day for freedom. After the election, Sergey Brin called an official Google company meeting to mourn their failure to get Hillary elected. Page and Brin together have a net worth of over $100 billion. They can financially support whomever they like in ways that no bank or political party could even imagine. When Google and Alphabet have this level of control over content and "PageRank", they get to influence elections not only through messaging and information control, but through financing.
1
I noticed this with military-related robot voice channels that all seem to be pro-Russian, or designed to agitate polarized groups against each other.
1
@dundonrl Communicate in old school burst, yes. Interoperate and provide seamless sensor interleaving? No. You need F-35 & MADL for that, which is what they're doing. F-16s with Link-16 aren't providing terminal guidance for SM-6 or providing OTH sensor imagery to the CIC. F-35 does that currently, which is an impressive force multiplier.
1
@agimasoschandir Algorithms are biased to form opinions, as dictated and cultivated by the ownership. Information control is huge business.
1
@agimasoschandir The Algorithms self-identify as Hillary supporters.
1
@agimasoschandir During the 2016 campaign, Google image search filtered out the photograph comparisons between Hillary Clinton campaign rallies versus Bernie Sanders or Trump rallies, which were packed. Hillary's average campaign rally attendance was 923. Trump and Bernie rallies were in the tens of thousands normally, with no room for everybody that wanted to attend, no matter the venue. Either Google's algorithms did this, or it was manually edited by pro-Hillary google, who is on record in the Podesta emails as having allocated $2.1 billion to her campaign before she even announced. Google presents a major problem for people who just want to see the facts, because Google is brazenly biased and displayed extreme bias in 2016. How long has this been going on? I think the facts should be impartial and unbiased. If a candidate can't generate enough enthusiasm for people to show up for their rallies in major cities across the US, we should be able to see that data and not have it manipulated by Google.
1