Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "BritMonkey" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11.  @danieleyre8913  You can’t adjust the length of a stripped Carcano stock, which is a foot longer than what Frazier saw. Imagine holding a 34” package under your arm, with one end cupped in your hand. The end of the package would protrude up 12” higher than his shoulder. I’m much taller than Oswald with much longer reach, and when I measured this, a yardstick extends 10” above my shoulder. The Carcano packed in a wrapper broken-down is a story for people who have no experience with military surplus rifles or bolt guns. This is a basic failure at math, and one of the many things that refutes the WC’s explanation for how he brought the rifle to the TSBD. There were no curtain rods. That was a story made-up by Dallas PD in their deal with Frazier. Frazier has made some very interesting statements lately, now that all those Dallas PD officers are dead. The shooting sequence could not be duplicated by Carlos Hathcock or any of the Senior USMC Scout Sniper Committee Instructors at Quantico, nor any of the students. It’s one thing to hit a static target within those ranges, and another entirely to hit a moving target repeatedly. Oswald has zero record of ever training on moving targets. I shoot moving targets in competition with rifles and pistols, and have done so for decades. The idea that a lone gunman got off that many shots on a partially exposed mover with a Carcano fails on many levels. In other words, it didn’t happen. Then look at the GSW forensics. More gymnastics from Arlen Specter that defy over a Century of recorded rifle terminal ballistics and the accounts of the Parkland doctors. If you still accept the Warren Commission in 2024, something is seriously wrong with your ability to think critically and dispassionately analyze data.
    1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16.  @danieleyre8913  The whole curtain rod story was manufactured long after Oswald’s death. Dallas PD was a known, fundamentally-corrupt police dept that specialized in frame-up jobs. It was their primary MO in cases so they wouldn’t have to do much work. They were never a bastion of even decent LE work, let alone anything resembling sound protocols in evidence collection and compliance with due process of law.  Once people started appealing their convictions, the overturned case rate was extremely high for Dallas PD. It was Dixie Mafia tied at the hip with business tycoons and Chicago Mafia. That’s why Ruby was sent by the Chicago outfit to work their nightclubs in the Dallas area and why he was always broke. If the Carcano didn’t need to be re-zeroed, why even install the scope and mount? See how the Carcano story falls apart upon basic inspection by people who are actual shooters and collectors? There would be no way for him to know whether it was zeroed or not upon reassembly. Here’s another thing they overlooked. I’m zoomed into CE139 right now looking at the stock cap/ferrule, and the stock band screws. To disassemble and reassemble the Fucile Corto Mod 91/38, you need a special type of flathead screwdriver commonly used by gunsmiths, to remove or loosen 4 different screws: The ferrule cross screw Stock/Handguard band screw Action screw front Action screw rear With the black-painted Mod 91/38s like CE139, the paint often makes the stock ferrule difficult to remove without a rubber mallet. Oswald would have had to re-install and tighten these 4 screws with a gunsmithing flathead driver, otherwise there would be screwdriver marks on the ferrule screw and stock band screw. Zoomed-in, I see zero evidence of any tampering with the screws at all, and the surface of the ferrule is clean and free from any nics or scratches that an amateur or ill-equipped person would normally leave. Stripping the flathead screws is a normal occurrence on mil-surps. If you asked me, I would say that rifle shows no signs of disassembly post-modification at the arsenal.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1