Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "NewsNation" channel.

  1. 6
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19.  @sentimentalbloke185  We use a planning process format called PACE, Primary, Alternate, Contingency, Emergency. For OSS training during WWII, they had towns in the Eastern US they used for insurgency and counter-occupation tactics, leveraging the resistance movements against the Nazis. The British Special Operations Executive trained the OSS on these tactics, techniques, and procedures. OSS also recruited Mafia hitmen and gangsters who already had hands-on experience in that space. For an urban sniper ambush, you have security elements who would signal the command & control element that the target was approaching (frequently Nazi officers in their command cars, or Nazis on motorcycles with the side car). They had to be very ingenuitive with signals with primary and alternates. In Dealey Plaza, it would make sense to use Radio and visual. Umbrella-pumping was an old technique used for signaling that would back-up the radio calls. You don't want your shooters to be set up too early with rifles pointed until the target is close to the kill zone, so the timing is crucial. You also need to work out your quick withdrawal and abort criteria, and can add diversions. For a High Value Target, you would have multiple shooters to ensure they are eliminated, regardless of how good your shooters have performed before. Moving targets are harder to hit, especially when partially-exposed. That whole set-up in Dealey Plaza is like the UW exercises in OSS training or Robin Sage for the SFQC, which is a direct descendant of OSS culmination exercises.
    1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. ​ @ADigbySellers Posner isn't remotely credible here. He isn't qualified to make any scientific statements about any of this. He's a quack attorney with zero experience in forensics, terminal ballistics, or gun shot wound behavior. I've been involved in this field with tens of thousands of observed rifle impacts through optics and high-speed cameras over the past 40 years, as well as laboratory setting live tissue studies and trauma management at the Joint Special Operations Medical Training Center. I have specifically focused on 6.5mm projectiles of all types and their terminal performance for the last 14 years, with published studies documenting their behavior in tissue and ballistics media. In my professional perspective, the final head shot observed on Zapruder shows a high velocity impact through JFK's right frontal region of the skull, immediately causing supersonic 90° spalling, and cavitation of the skull with avulsion of the right scalp. This had to have come from the front. A 6.5x52 Carcano seems to be what produced the throat and back wounds, if we accept SS Agent Landis recent testimony that he found "the prestine bullet" on the ledge behind JFK, and placed it on his gurney at Parkland so it would stay with JFK. I have some suspicions about a higher velocity rifle cartridge used for the head shot. What I can say with surety is the WC fundamentally undermines itself throughout, including the ballistic creations it uses to try to make a single shooter fit the lone gunman narrative. Given Landis' recent statements, the magic bullet theory can finally be put to bed. Posner should just go away quietly and not say anymore on the subject, unless it's a total retraction of all of his claims.
    1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26.  @turhankhan1503  There are at least 9 Keys against the party in the WH right now. 1. You are absolutely correct on Party mandate, as Dems lost seats and Republicans gained in 2022 Mid-Terms to be the majority. FALSE 2. There was no primary contest because the DNC forcibly removed the sitting President and installed Kamala with no delegation. How do we weigh that in the keys? 3. Incumbent was seeking reelection but was replaced with the VP. It’s weird again. 4. There WAS a 3rd Party, who then joined the opposition, and it isn’t just anyone, but a common household name who is the son of the assassinated RFK. This should weigh doubly against the incumbent party. 5. Short term Economy is not strong. FALSE 6. Long term Economy is not strong. DTI, income/housing ratio is way off, inflation, energy, everything costs more. FALSE 7. Major policy change-they never had a mandate even with 81 million votes? Where’s the major legislation? Biden WH just opened the border, which is a huge negative. FALSE 8. Social unrest. College pro-Palestinian protests FALSE 9. Scandals. So numerous, yet Allan says no. Hunter Biden alone has how many, all tying to his dad, then the cocaine, James Biden money-laundering, Biden classified documents, blackmailing Ukraine, Secret Service, withholding protection from RFK Jr. when he was 3rd Party, multiple assassination attempts against challenger...I mean, these are unprecedented scandals. Kamala as border Tsar is a huge scandal that is costing Americans their lives every day. Apartment complex takeovers by Venezuelan gangs? Are you kidding? FALSE 10. Abject military failure with Afghan withdrawal and vcxx mandates, forcing service members out. FALSE 11. No foreign or military successes. FALSE 12. No charisma at all. FALSE 13. Challenger and his team have amazing charisma with Trump, VP Vance, RFK Jr, Tulsi, and Vivek. FALSE That’s 10 FALSE answers to the 13 Keys. Allan ignored these and didn’t even talk about RFK Jr., the scandals, the economy, or the weird case of the DNC and removing Biden.
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 100% nailed it. He ignored his own metrics and didn’t even appear to read them when making this insane forecast. Let’s go through the keys together to see what I’m talking about: 1. Party Mandate. Dems lost seats in the 2022 Mid Terms, didn’t gain. R: 212 - 222 D: 220 - 2013. This should be a FALSE by his metrics. 2. No Primary contest. This one is unique in 2024 because the sitting President was removed agains his will and Kamala announced as the nominee without any convention or delegate process. He doesn’t even have a metric for this. Either way, it doesn’t benefit the incumbent party. Even if we list it as technical TRUE, it weighs against the incumbent party. 3. Incumbent seeking reelection. Incumbent but was removed with a soft coup. VP installed, so it’s a huge FALSE. 4. No 3rd Party. There was the strongest 3rd party campaign since Ross Perot with RFK Jr., but he JOINED the challenging party platform! This is a double-FALSE against the incumbent because the challenger was not only a Dem, but a Kennedy who is the son of assassinated RFK and favored Dem candidate in 1968. I would list this as a FALSE x 2. 5. Strong short-term economy. Weird, as he lists this as a TRUE when it is FALSE. Jobs numbers and inflation are misrepresented in the media, with constant revisions post-haste. One of the #1 complaints from Americans is cost of groceries, income to cost of living expenses, gas, housing, transportation, and medical. FALSE 6. Strong long-term economy. Allan must read CNN and the WSJ if he thinks per capita economic growth equals or exceeds the mean growth of the two previous terms. Younger people looking for first-time home buying can’t afford to enter the market and are stuck renting. Inflation has squeezed most people’s budgets to exclude marginal products and services, causing a recession in many industries. This one is a big FALSE. 7. Major policy change. You would think Biden had entered the WH with a huge mandate with 81 million votes, yet there was no sweeping reforms or support from Congress or the electorate. This is one of the biggest anomalies in US election history. The main thing the Biden/Harris WH has done is open the border so millions of unvetted illegal immigrants have swarmed into the Nation. This is not a positive, so to weight it as one is erroneous. It only makes sense to mark it as technically true, but bad for the Country. 8. No social unrest. What are we calling all the pro-Palestinian protests, shutting down access to class for college students, and the occupation of apartment complexes by foreign gangs? Biden himself called the college campus unrest “chaos”. FALSE 9. No Scandal. Allan must be reading DC corporate media. Vaccine mandate scandal for military and DoD, hospitals, public employees, and private sector. Did he not hear about the Hunter Biden money-laundering scandal that directly implicates himself in a foreign bribery scheme lasting many years? Then you have the Biden classified documents scandal, which ties into the Hunter laptop showing an espionage ring, his brother James’ investigation for money-laundering and tax evasion, Hunter Biden tax evasion trial, Hunter Biden illegal firearm possession, the cocaine WH scandal, the Secret Service scandal of denying protection to RFK Jr, the Trump assassination attempts after Biden Secret Service failures and withholding of resources, the Ukraine scandal where Biden was involved in blackmailing Ukraine and now under his WH, Putin invaded. To top it off, Biden has called Trump supporters “garbage". So this is another big failure per Allan’s metrics. FALSE 10. No foreign or military failure. Afghan withdrawal was one of the biggest foreign and military failures in US history. Eruption of the Middle East into regional conflict with ballistic missiles, genocidal terrorist strikes, hostage-taking, bombings, and missile exchanges is escalating into unprecedented conflict. Allan correctly assesses this as a FALSE. 11. Major foreign or military success. Allan chalks this up as a TRUE. Not sure what he’s referring to. Most Americans would agree we have had no foreign or military success under Biden. A great metric for measuring this is military recruitment and retention, which is way down to alarming levels. FALSE 12. Charismatic incumbent. Neither Biden nor Kamala are even remotely charismatic. Both are incompetent and terrible public speakers. FALSE 13. Uncharismatic challenger. Allan correctly recognizes Trump is charismatic. FALSE There are at least 10 FALSE responses to Allan’s metrics, yet he somehow thinks there are less than 6. I would really love to debate him on this because even if I’m generous and list 2, 3, and 4 differently, there are still 9 FALSE responses to his keys. How did he skip over all his own metrics?
    1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1