Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "NewsNation"
channel.
-
6
-
Simultaneous shots fired into a kill zone are ambush basics. We did it all the time in the Army, as it is driven by the placement of the target(s) in the kill zone.
Security elements give notice via Radio that an enemy element is approaching the kill zone through a choke point on a linear route (trail, road, stream, river), and once ambush GO criteria are met, the Patrol Leader initiates the ambush, followed by everyone else in the Support-By-Fire and assault line positions.
Even half-human savages can be adept at ambushes, let alone professional gunmen hired for a high priority hit.
Again, this comes down to most people who know nothing about the details of these subjects, pontificating from outside of the knowledge base.
It's better to ask questions than make statements if you don't know:
* Firearms external and terminal ballistics specific to high velocity rifles
* GSW behavior in the human body, specifically high velocity rifle wounding mechanisms to the neck, torso, and skull
* Read the 888 page WC summary, as well as eye witness accounts that were excluded from it.
4
-
4
-
Multiple eye witnesses from a wide range of vantage points saw 2 men in the 6th floor window, one with a light coat/shirt, the other with a darker brown worker's suit.
Johnny L. Powell
Ronald B. Fischer
Ruby Henderson
Carolyn Walker
They all saw either 2 men, or 1 man with light hair (Fischer had a street-level vantage point looking up at the TSBD, so couldn't see into the window like the others did. Investigators tried to bully him into saying the man with a light colored shirt had dark hair, but he refused to alter his testimony for Warren Commission assistant counsel, David W. Belin, to the extent he almost fought him in the interview room because of Belin's intimidation tactics.
Oswald was down in the lunch room. When police charged into the TSBD and had assistance from boss Truly, they couldn't get into the service elevator, because these men were using it.
They instead ran up the stairs, encountered Oswald on a lower level, then continued up the stairs.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AugustoCuervo-hx9pr You might want to also look at:
Finance, heavy industries, real estate, auto, tech, retail, computing and electronics, software, pharma, professional/scientific/technical services, aerospace, construction, manufacturing, management, chemicals, home and personal care, telecom, insurance, union retirement accounts....
There's a lot more to the US economy than energy, though it is the lifeblood of all of them.
Russia hates that the US has so much capacity in energy because it drives down their revenue significantly.
1
-
1
-
@ttatum The Italian, Sicilian, and Russian Jew Mafia wanted Kennedy dead too, because he betrayed them after they helped him get elected with the unions and massive voter fraud in Illinois and Michigan.
Papa Joe Kennedy negotiated with the Mafia to get his son elected, and in exchange, Jack would put a leash on Bobby, who had been going after rival organized crime like a putbull. The Kennedy clan came from 1800s era mid-blood Irish mobsters who rose into political power, and were part of the old money that saw the Italians, Sicilians, and Russian Jews as major threats to their existing political rackets.
Once JFK made Bobby AG, and he went after the new mob with even more fervor, the decision was made. Remember that the OSS and FBI were filled with Mafia hitmen and racketeers during the War.
OSS became the CIA. Hoover said the Mafia was a myth, didn't exist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sentimentalbloke185 We use a planning process format called PACE, Primary, Alternate, Contingency, Emergency.
For OSS training during WWII, they had towns in the Eastern US they used for insurgency and counter-occupation tactics, leveraging the resistance movements against the Nazis.
The British Special Operations Executive trained the OSS on these tactics, techniques, and procedures. OSS also recruited Mafia hitmen and gangsters who already had hands-on experience in that space.
For an urban sniper ambush, you have security elements who would signal the command & control element that the target was approaching (frequently Nazi officers in their command cars, or Nazis on motorcycles with the side car).
They had to be very ingenuitive with signals with primary and alternates.
In Dealey Plaza, it would make sense to use Radio and visual. Umbrella-pumping was an old technique used for signaling that would back-up the radio calls.
You don't want your shooters to be set up too early with rifles pointed until the target is close to the kill zone, so the timing is crucial.
You also need to work out your quick withdrawal and abort criteria, and can add diversions.
For a High Value Target, you would have multiple shooters to ensure they are eliminated, regardless of how good your shooters have performed before.
Moving targets are harder to hit, especially when partially-exposed.
That whole set-up in Dealey Plaza is like the UW exercises in OSS training or Robin Sage for the SFQC, which is a direct descendant of OSS culmination exercises.
1
-
1
-
@Caeruleo The doctors with hundreds of samples of GSW entrance/exit experience will of course stomp the amateurs they had run the autopsy at Bethesda, with General LeMay barking out orders from inside the room, puffing away at his cigar.
But you can just look at Zapruder and see 90° supersonic spalling and blood splatter from the point of impact.
This is something you don't see with exit wounds of the skull. Exit wound ejecta and spatter typically blow out with about 30° of spatter from the flight path of what's left of the projectile.
For the impact side, due to the vascular nature of the face, you will see 90° spalling and splatter, exactly as seen in Zapruder.
You also see the projectile momentum transfer into the skull, sending it backwards.
I've been observing tens of thousands of rifle impacts through optics, high-speed camera, or on live tissue over the past 4 decades.
Gerald Posner has zero business discussing terminal ballistics, trauma, or forensics unless he's asking questions from people that actually know what they're talking about.
In other words, he should shut his mouth on this whole subject.
1
-
@ADigbySellers Posner isn't remotely credible here. He isn't qualified to make any scientific statements about any of this. He's a quack attorney with zero experience in forensics, terminal ballistics, or gun shot wound behavior.
I've been involved in this field with tens of thousands of observed rifle impacts through optics and high-speed cameras over the past 40 years, as well as laboratory setting live tissue studies and trauma management at the Joint Special Operations Medical Training Center.
I have specifically focused on 6.5mm projectiles of all types and their terminal performance for the last 14 years, with published studies documenting their behavior in tissue and ballistics media.
In my professional perspective, the final head shot observed on Zapruder shows a high velocity impact through JFK's right frontal region of the skull, immediately causing supersonic 90° spalling, and cavitation of the skull with avulsion of the right scalp. This had to have come from the front.
A 6.5x52 Carcano seems to be what produced the throat and back wounds, if we accept SS Agent Landis recent testimony that he found "the prestine bullet" on the ledge behind JFK, and placed it on his gurney at Parkland so it would stay with JFK.
I have some suspicions about a higher velocity rifle cartridge used for the head shot.
What I can say with surety is the WC fundamentally undermines itself throughout, including the ballistic creations it uses to try to make a single shooter fit the lone gunman narrative.
Given Landis' recent statements, the magic bullet theory can finally be put to bed. Posner should just go away quietly and not say anymore on the subject, unless it's a total retraction of all of his claims.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@turhankhan1503 There are at least 9 Keys against the party in the WH right now.
1. You are absolutely correct on Party mandate, as Dems lost seats and Republicans gained in 2022 Mid-Terms to be the majority. FALSE
2. There was no primary contest because the DNC forcibly removed the sitting President and installed Kamala with no delegation. How do we weigh that in the keys?
3. Incumbent was seeking reelection but was replaced with the VP. It’s weird again.
4. There WAS a 3rd Party, who then joined the opposition, and it isn’t just anyone, but a common household name who is the son of the assassinated RFK. This should weigh doubly against the incumbent party.
5. Short term Economy is not strong. FALSE
6. Long term Economy is not strong. DTI, income/housing ratio is way off, inflation, energy, everything costs more. FALSE
7. Major policy change-they never had a mandate even with 81 million votes? Where’s the major legislation? Biden WH just opened the border, which is a huge negative. FALSE
8. Social unrest. College pro-Palestinian protests FALSE
9. Scandals. So numerous, yet Allan says no. Hunter Biden alone has how many, all tying to his dad, then the cocaine, James Biden money-laundering, Biden classified documents, blackmailing Ukraine, Secret Service, withholding protection from RFK Jr. when he was 3rd Party, multiple assassination attempts against challenger...I mean, these are unprecedented scandals. Kamala as border Tsar is a huge scandal that is costing Americans their lives every day. Apartment complex takeovers by Venezuelan gangs? Are you kidding? FALSE
10. Abject military failure with Afghan withdrawal and vcxx mandates, forcing service members out. FALSE
11. No foreign or military successes. FALSE
12. No charisma at all. FALSE
13. Challenger and his team have amazing charisma with Trump, VP Vance, RFK Jr, Tulsi, and Vivek. FALSE
That’s 10 FALSE answers to the 13 Keys. Allan ignored these and didn’t even talk about RFK Jr., the scandals, the economy, or the weird case of the DNC and removing Biden.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
100% nailed it. He ignored his own metrics and didn’t even appear to read them when making this insane forecast.
Let’s go through the keys together to see what I’m talking about:
1. Party Mandate. Dems lost seats in the 2022 Mid Terms, didn’t gain. R: 212 - 222 D: 220 - 2013. This should be a FALSE by his metrics.
2. No Primary contest. This one is unique in 2024 because the sitting President was removed agains his will and Kamala announced as the nominee without any convention or delegate process. He doesn’t even have a metric for this. Either way, it doesn’t benefit the incumbent party. Even if we list it as technical TRUE, it weighs against the incumbent party.
3. Incumbent seeking reelection. Incumbent but was removed with a soft coup. VP installed, so it’s a huge FALSE.
4. No 3rd Party. There was the strongest 3rd party campaign since Ross Perot with RFK Jr., but he JOINED the challenging party platform! This is a double-FALSE against the incumbent because the challenger was not only a Dem, but a Kennedy who is the son of assassinated RFK and favored Dem candidate in 1968. I would list this as a FALSE x 2.
5. Strong short-term economy. Weird, as he lists this as a TRUE when it is FALSE. Jobs numbers and inflation are misrepresented in the media, with constant revisions post-haste. One of the #1 complaints from Americans is cost of groceries, income to cost of living expenses, gas, housing, transportation, and medical. FALSE
6. Strong long-term economy. Allan must read CNN and the WSJ if he thinks per capita economic growth equals or exceeds the mean growth of the two previous terms. Younger people looking for first-time home buying can’t afford to enter the market and are stuck renting. Inflation has squeezed most people’s budgets to exclude marginal products and services, causing a recession in many industries. This one is a big FALSE.
7. Major policy change. You would think Biden had entered the WH with a huge mandate with 81 million votes, yet there was no sweeping reforms or support from Congress or the electorate. This is one of the biggest anomalies in US election history. The main thing the Biden/Harris WH has done is open the border so millions of unvetted illegal immigrants have swarmed into the Nation. This is not a positive, so to weight it as one is erroneous. It only makes sense to mark it as technically true, but bad for the Country.
8. No social unrest. What are we calling all the pro-Palestinian protests, shutting down access to class for college students, and the occupation of apartment complexes by foreign gangs? Biden himself called the college campus unrest “chaos”. FALSE
9. No Scandal. Allan must be reading DC corporate media. Vaccine mandate scandal for military and DoD, hospitals, public employees, and private sector. Did he not hear about the Hunter Biden money-laundering scandal that directly implicates himself in a foreign bribery scheme lasting many years? Then you have the Biden classified documents scandal, which ties into the Hunter laptop showing an espionage ring, his brother James’ investigation for money-laundering and tax evasion, Hunter Biden tax evasion trial, Hunter Biden illegal firearm possession, the cocaine WH scandal, the Secret Service scandal of denying protection to RFK Jr, the Trump assassination attempts after Biden Secret Service failures and withholding of resources, the Ukraine scandal where Biden was involved in blackmailing Ukraine and now under his WH, Putin invaded. To top it off, Biden has called Trump supporters “garbage". So this is another big failure per Allan’s metrics. FALSE
10. No foreign or military failure. Afghan withdrawal was one of the biggest foreign and military failures in US history. Eruption of the Middle East into regional conflict with ballistic missiles, genocidal terrorist strikes, hostage-taking, bombings, and missile exchanges is escalating into unprecedented conflict. Allan correctly assesses this as a FALSE.
11. Major foreign or military success. Allan chalks this up as a TRUE. Not sure what he’s referring to. Most Americans would agree we have had no foreign or military success under Biden. A great metric for measuring this is military recruitment and retention, which is way down to alarming levels. FALSE
12. Charismatic incumbent. Neither Biden nor Kamala are even remotely charismatic. Both are incompetent and terrible public speakers. FALSE
13. Uncharismatic challenger. Allan correctly recognizes Trump is charismatic. FALSE
There are at least 10 FALSE responses to Allan’s metrics, yet he somehow thinks there are less than 6. I would really love to debate him on this because even if I’m generous and list 2, 3, and 4 differently, there are still 9 FALSE responses to his keys. How did he skip over all his own metrics?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1