Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Bloomberg Television"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just Me: You realize the US de-conflicted with the Russian liaison to make sure no Russians were in that area, right? Russian liaison said, "No, we don't have anyone there. It's not us." These guys were mercenaries given a suicide mission with no air support, not that F-22 would allow you to have air support anyway. Turns out a lot of them were in Donbas too, with support from back channels of the Kremlin. Slavonic volunteer Battalions, armed with tanks, APCs, artillery, communications, engineer units to build the pontoon bridge, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ross K: Good luck getting past US Air Power. So far, nobody has even come close. Russian fighters in Ukraine included conventional units. There were soldiers who took selfies of themselves and posted them online, covering their travels in Russia, to the staging area just over the border, to their operations inside Ukraine. It's there for anyone to see. They did it themselves.
What do you think would happen to 50,000 Chechen volunteers, if Russia figured out how to feed, water, house, and supply them (hint: Russia can't even do that for their own forces.). They would just be slaughtered like dogs in a matter of hours/days. The US has a very small presence in Syria with advisors and some SOF units, embedded with the Kurds. Northeastern Syria is Kurdish territory and protected by the most superior air assets the world has ever known. Again, good luck.
Chechens have already been taking the US on in Iraq. We hunted them down like dogs and shot them in the face where they slept when we located their cells.
Move all the S-300 and S-400 IADS into Syria you want. More opportunities to show how far Russian tech has fallen back compared to US SEAD capabilities.
If you're Australian, then you should know that the US and Australia are some of the tightest allies on the planet, and the US supplies Australia with the most advanced technology, weapons, and training opportunities. What kind of Australian openly supports Russia agains the US, while spelling his basic words incorrectly?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joshsch1331 You didn't define the last generation, but I think you meant baby boomers. We're 3 generations past baby boomers with Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z.
Boomers constituted a very diverse workforce and socioeconomic strata with a lot of economic mobility.
The factory workers were the GI and Silent generations before them. A good resource to study would be The Fourth Turning by Strauss and Howe.
Boomers had all sorts of jobs ranging from the mundane to the advanced aerospace, telecom, and computer industries. Many invested in real estate.
Their biggest challenge wasn't economic, but family, as they had significantly higher rates of fathers and mothers working to finance larger homes, while neglecting their Gen X children.
Divorce rates and broken homes increased, with many children basically being raised between the public schools and bouncing between visitation with parents that didn't have time for them anyway.
Through societal programming with TV, people were conditioned through repetition and marketing to buy more and bigger things they didn't need, while sacrificing a stable home and family life.
Gen X continued this madness, with limited connection to their parents since they felt abandoned.
Many boomers ended up raising their millennial grandchildren in the wake of Gen X divorces, so millennials have a natural distrust of the prior generations, while being more friendly with their hands-off Gen X parents.
These generational dynamics drive much of the underlying currents in the US and Anglo nations. This pattern is not new, and has repeated itself for hundreds of years in a cycle according to Strauss-Howe.
The politics follow that, even with the global elites and their children.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1