Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Vox" channel.

@Daniele Lombardo The Ayatollah fired the Iranian Air Defense General when he found out later via the Iranian intelligence service gathering post-mission chatter. Look it up. The Israelis waited for the Russians to equip Iran with new S-300 system nodes and integrate them into existing Iranian IADS network, then they flew their F-35Is into Iran and conducted extensive Intelligence/Surveillance/Reconnaissance of illegal Iranian nuke sites, IADS nodes, bases, etc. as if they owned the place. So much for "stealth doesn't work".
57
Look at the sling swivels. The alleged rifle has them on the left side. The rifle in these photos has them on the bottom of the stock. Can't be the same rifle.
41
@williamzabel2080 100% incorrect. Israelis only wanted the ability to do their own programming of the central super computer bank. They don't have the production base to be able to re-build F-35s. There is nothing systems-based in it they could eally improve on outside of collaboration with the JSF program.
32
@williamzabel2080 They produce their F-35 wings in Israel per the F-35 TDP with technical sharing with Lockheed. The main modifications are electronic and country-specific weapons-based, not structural. They need to be able to integrate with their own data link network and have their own EW systems internal to the aircraft, without it being linked to other F-35 users if they don't want it to. The F-35 airframe is much stronger than legacy airframes and is rated to twice the service life flight hours as what we see with F-16s or Hornets. Israeli Elbit Systems is already a major contractor in the JSF program. Do you have any sources for the structural modifications? That's the first I've heard of them.
32
@rdarkmind Sling swivels in the photos are on the bottom of the stock. The rifle in possession that was supplanted (after the 7.65 Mauser disappeared) is an Italian 6.5x52 Carcano with a left side mounted sling, not bottom sling mounts. You can clearly see the differences between the 2 rifles, so if the photos are authentic, then that isn't the same rifle. In one of his residences and storage areas, along with a spotting scope, multiple cameras, binos, pace counter, flashlight, compass, pro-Castro pamphlets, and pocket dictionary, was found partial boxes of .303 Enfield rifle cartridges. The first rifle discovered in the TSBD was a 7.65mm Mauser, and 4 Dallas PD officers who were there filled out sworn statements to that fact. 3 were convinced to change their sworn affidavits (a crime), while the 4th refused. His name was Roger Craig. He was later fired, and shot himself in the chest with a .22LR rifle as his father mowed the lawn in 1975, before he could testify in front of the HSCA during the Church Committee hearings.
21
@maniswolftoman So foreign services assets operating overseas in 1963 (average age for those types is in the late 40s to early 50s) who shouldn't be in Dallas, are worried about their identities being revealed? Let's say they were in their late 20s in 1963 after their military service or Ivy league school, the Farm, language school, special regional orientation and other courses. A 27yr-old in 1963 would be 86 today. The USSR doesn't exist, and any hostile nations from the USSR don't exist anymore as they were then. A 34yr old operative in '63 (still very young) would be 93 today. Most of these folks are dead, as are the people they interacted with overseas. This brings us back to Dallas, not overseas operations, unless Oswald was an intelligence operative for the US. Even still, who cares? I grew up in a highly classified community, held clearances when I was in the military, and some of the things we were involved in have exceeded their NDAs by timing out after 4 decades, very sensitive Unacknowledged programs that never happened officially. The document dump from 2018 exposed a lot of bombshells, especially commo between LBJ and Hoover, JD Tippit on the overpass, and eye witness testimony seeing Oswald and Ruby together in Miami. We also have the memos where investigators asked CIA agent George Bush in Dallas of his Cuban ex-pats had anything to do with it, where he asked them and they said no.
12
@maniswolftoman 2018 is when thousands of files were declassified and released. They include Hoover and LBJ discussing the need to wrap up the narrative around Oswald as the lone gunman, Oswald working with Jack Ruby in Miami, and older memos from Hoover to CIA and Naval ONI asking about why nobody detained Oswald when he returned to the US after defecting to the Soviets. It also has an eye witness report filed by Dallas FBI where Officer JD Tippit was on the rail overpass with a rifle, facing the motorcade and that JD Tippit was the Dallas Chapter Chairman for John Birch Society.
10
@maniswolftoman I've been researching the JFK assassination since the 1980s, starting with the 888 page WC Report summary.
8
@maniswolftoman Relevancy?
7
The real kicker is Oswald liked JFK.
7
@michaelocchipinti8265 Ruth Paine's sister, Sylvia Hoke, was an employee of the CIA and lived in Falls Church, VA. That's where a lot of Agency people lived/live due to proximity to Langley. Sylvia visited Ruth Paine in September, 1963. The 2018 document dump shows that investigators asked the CIA to ask around if anyone they were working with might have had something to do with it. A helpful CIA man named George Bush asked his Cuban ex-pat trainees if they did it, but they said even though they hated Kennedy, they didn't do it. FBI said "thanks for your help".
5
This channel is a disaster, but YouTube keeps bumping it with their algorithms.
4
So the Founders were concerned with the police having free speech, peaceful assembly, the right to their own religion, and not being searched by the police without a warrant? How interesting.
2
You should talk to the French and Dutch resistance, the Viet Cong, and every other rag tag group that successfully resisted invasion or occupation. Your argument does bring up the unconstitutionality of the 1934 NFA though, so your argument is actually in favor of people's rights, not the oppressor.
2
When the 1st Amendment was written, death-spitting harmful-word assault typewriters were not even invented. The nuclear blast of the internet was 200 years away. That 1st Amendment should be amended because more people have been killed by Islamic terrorists issuing fatwahs online, inspiring apes to attack innocent people. Too free for alarmists, the 1st Amendment needs to go.
2
@logantotman That word "expert" is one of the most misused in our speech. I've spent over 40 years working with firearms, the last 20 years specific to several 6.5mm cartridges and their internal, external, and terminal ballistics.
2
Vox is a disaster. They need to spend several years studying military aviation before ever covering a military aviation story again.
2
Varrel Aulia R.: Your cost figures are way off. F-35A is $94.3 million. F/A-18E Super Hornet fly-away without Electro-Optical Aiming sensors, JHMCS, and other critical mission equipment that has to be added to make it fleet worthy. The F-35 already has next generation versions of all those systems, plus more capabilities the F/A-18 will never have, for less cost. The most comparable production 4th Gen + fighter that has older generation capabilities that try to compete with the F-35 is the F-16E/F being sold to Dubai. Those are $200 million a piece, and still not low observable. Anytime you see someone try to compare costs of a 4th Gen aircraft with the F-35, make sure to add the Sniper Pods, ECM suite, JHMCS, AESA radar, etc. and then realize that you still don't have super cruise, you still have a huge radar cross section, poor high altitude performance when cruising, and 1980s-era cockpits with high pilot workload when managing BVR closure and evasion, air-to-ground missions, navigation, etc. Go watch Colonel Burke's analysis of the F-35. He was an F/A-18 pilot, Top Gun Instructor, ground FAC in Ramadi, F22 pilot, and F-35B lead transition program pilot. He said he used to compare the F-35 based on his understanding of 4th Gen birds, but now realizes that if you are flying a 4th Gen bird against 5th Gen, you're already dead. He describes it as a game-changer, and said they haven't even cracked the surface on how it will change the way we fight.
2
I think I will add hyperbole to the argument invoking nukes, which very few world governments even have access to. Where do we all agree on this issue? That's where the crux of the argument is. We all agree that access to arms = power. Some people are not comfortable with the people having power and would like to see that power removed from their neighbors by government. Others think that it isn't their neighbor's business to determine what kind of power they have access to, and err on the side of freedom, because we already know what absolute power in government looks like (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.).
1
Jacob Rubenstein smuggled weapons and narcotics for the CIA, as well as Mafia. He was frequently in Chicago, Dallas, New Orleans, and Miami. The night club was part of his money laundering operation and he had informants and corrupt cops in Dallas PD who got free liquor and women at the club. It's why he was able to gain access to Dallas PD to go clean up the loose end.
1
@FamilyNeverFold The mental gymnastics people go through to try to make sense of Rubenstein and still fit into the lone gunman narrative are comical to watch. “He did it to spare Jackie from the pain of a trial!” You really have to be gullible to believe that story.
1
@maniswolftoman The 2018 document dump undermines the WC, just as the volumes of the WC undermine and contradict the official conclusions. 3 members of the WC didn't believe the findings and conclusions, namely Oswald's strange story, the magic bullet, and the fact Allen Dulles was on the WC. Then there's the Walter Cronkite interview with LBJ that wasn't aired, now available.
1