Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "RFU News — Reporting from Ukraine"
channel.
-
18
-
@KirkFickert I agree on the Hornet for dealing with Soviet-era runways, which are big tiles with gaps that allow for the thermal expansion and contraction throughout the year. Hornet landing gear is very robust.
F-16 main landing gear are pretty tough, but the nose landing gear is not.
F-16 does better in BVR due to kinematics, but its Radar is small. Hornet with APG-79 would be a game-changer for Ukraine, and the USN and USMC Hornets were plumbed for SEAD with the HARM dating back to the 1980s.
Hornet with APG-79, ATFLIR, JDAM, and AIM-120C7 would put a hurt on Russian air, but would also be targeted by S-300, Su-35S, and MiG-31BM + R-37M.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nvelsen1975 I've been studying Soviet order of battle since the 1970s. Recognition skills were bread and butter for me in most of the units I was in, while the Army has atrophied that skill set due to GWOT, multi-generational institutional laziness, and overreliance on technology, assuming someone else will do the work for them.
Russians are still able to upload video online, which lately have included the MiG-31BM crash up in the Murmansk military district, as well as crashes, shoot-downs, impacts, and weapons effects in Crimea and along the border. We also have seen their own security camera footage of the accidental bombing of Belgorod, the crash of a Flanker into an apartment building, the drone strikes on strategic bomber airfields, sabotage, and many other relevant incidents.
1
-
1
-
1