Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. The real argument is not a mechanical one, but a legal one. The NFA and 1986 MG registry closure created 2 classes of people with regard to exercising rights: 1. The ultra-wealthy elites who can afford to buy a real machinegun, Sub-Machinegun, or select-fire assault rifle for the entry fee of $14,000 to $200,000 or more, with a $200 tax and dealer transfer fees. 2. The deprived peasant-citizen who has no ability to exercise these rights. Pre-1986, it was much more affordable to buy automatic weapons through the $200 stamp tax infringement process, though still an offense to the 2A and the People. Remember that the NFA didn’t make keeping and bearing machine-guns illegal. It infringed on the rights of the people by creating a special bypass taxation scheme that only less than 1% of the populace can afford to pay for. This is the only valid argument in this case. Bump stocks are a cheap way for the people to imitate owning a machinegun without actually having one that works well enough for 2A purposes. For technical merits, a semi-automatic firearm equipped with a bump-fire stock is not a machinegun, and neither is an M16, AKM, or Uzi. Select fire rifles are assault rifles. Pistol caliber, compact, magazine-fed, automatic weapons are Submachineguns (SMGs). Machineguns are belt-fed. The idiots in Congress in 1934 got it all wrong, as has every Congress since (1968 and 1986). These are people who failed to bring in actual SMEs on the subject to clarify and contrast the different types of arms that are restricted from being infringed upon by any entity in the US.
    2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31.  @frankenz66  I’ve been a delegate before and have been to many meetings where people say the same, but I agreed with them in several particular cases because their conscience in those cases was in line with the Constitution. This was just delegates though. What happens is that once a delegate goes to the State and Federal level Q&A meetings with Senators/Congressmen/AGs/etc., there is a large effort funded by the sponsors to steer opinion with lots of “facts” to support their corporate agendas. Most people who have been to college are poorly-equipped to filter through these facts because they have zero formal critical thinking training or analytical skills, so it’s actually better to send someone with good gut instinct or someone with a PhD or strong scientific background, because the corporate sponsors/campaign bundlers are excellent at appeal to emotion arguments supported by select data. The pillars of thinking that get immediately eliminated are Completeness, Fairness, Accuracy, Relevancy, Depth, Precision, and Logic. It’s very easy to sway delegates to think a certain way, and the rigged political parties have been in this business for basically 2 centuries, with a populace who has only gotten dumber. The big party meetings teach representatives to look down at their stupid peasant constituents, and how to manipulate them into foregone conclusions that only benefit the campaign financiers. The whole thing is a cursed illusion with some extra games to play than in an outright corrupt system, but the results are basically the same.
    2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2