Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Amanpour and Company" channel.

I disagree with his assessments strongly. He hasn't made the correct conclusions because he's a Democrat partisan trying to make it all fit into the blame Trump narrative, when Trump is the only President who kept Putin in check in Ukraine and Syria, with overt warfare against Russian mercenaries decimating them for 6 hours of bombardment when they attacked US SOF forces in Syria.
2
@steveperreira5850 He's not correct. Trump demonstrated exactly that by punching Putin in those nose hard with the annihilation of Wagner mercenaries in Syria. Trump also supplied Zelensky with Javelins. Look at how effective Javelins have been in destroying hundreds of Russian tanks and armored vehicles.
2
@news2hedz227 Nobody wants the Russian invasion of Ukraine to spread into the rest of Europe. My family is from Finland, and we're awaiting Russian aggression at any time, like they did in 1939. We lost my 3 great uncles to KIA in the war, 1 went missing/kidnapped, and my grandpa's younger sister was raped and murdered by the Germans. This whole thing has always been a matter of when, not if.
2
@kathryngibbons1104 He's not a patriot. He's a partisan Democrat trying to make the world fit into that mindset. It doesn't fit into any partisan pigeon hole. His assessment of Trump-Zellensky is so far off the mark, as is his perception of Trump and Ukraine. Biden literally got into the Senate with help from the Soviets in 1972 and has been on their payroll since. His son was literally caught in business deals with Russian human trafficking rings run by Moscow mayor's wife, Putin's puppet running Ukrainian energy company Burisma, as well as Chinese communist front companies' boards used as intermediaries to bribe Biden. Putin waited for Trump to leave office before launching this agreed-upon attack, where Biden was supposed to pull Zelensky out of Ukraine making it appear to be help, when in reality it was to help Putin. Zelensky didn't play along, and here we are.
1
@jamesjackovich5886 The big question all along was what would happen to the EU when one of the member states has their security threatened. Looks like we will find out soon.
1
@jamesjackovich5886 Europeans will be at war with each other as the energy and food crisis reminds them of the cemented reality of their regional divisions. US not only provides security for Europe, but Pacific and the Persian Gulf. China more than anyone can't afford for the US to withdraw from the Persian Gulf and Pacific. They need us more than anyone, otherwise their supply of oil is under threat from India, Southeast Asia, Australia, Philippines, and Japan. India and Japan being the next biggest dependents on ME oil shipments.
1
He is a partisan hack though who gets it all wrong because of that. Trump was the hardest President on Putin of them all-the only one who supervised the open military engagement of Russian forces in Syria when they attacked US SOF over the Euphrates. Trump is the one who sent Ukraine Javelin ATGMs, which have been instrumental in thwarting Putin's plans for taking Kiev or making much progress.
1
He spoke in broad generalities about hubs of support like Lend-Lease. In Lend-Lease, we literally gave Stalin the components to build the first Soviet nuclear weapons, in addition to over 100,000 trucks, tanks, fighters, bombers, steel, aluminum, copper, avgas, fuel, clothing, medical supplies, etc.
1
He lied repeatedly throughout this interview. His assessment and recommendations are amateur at-best. Trump supervised the annihilation of a 2 battalion strength Russian/Syrian battle group in Syria when they attacked US SOF forces. The amount of JDAMs and Xcalibur munitions that were dropped on those Russians lasted for 6+ hours, and would never have happened under a Bush, Clinton, Obama, or Biden WH-Never. Trump provided Ukraine with devastating amounts of Javelin anti-tank missiles, which we now have seen in effect for 1.5 months, while Biden tried to pull Zelensky out of Ukraine so Putin could move in per the agreement. LTC Vindman is way off the mark here.
1
He's anything but that. He has everything backwards regarding the analysis on Trump, Putin, and channeling his outlook through US partisanship. Biden has literally been in Russia's pocket since 1972. Trump is the only US President who supervised the brutal annihilation of Russian forces in Syria when they attacked US SOF and Kurds. Trump is the President who provided Ukraine with Javelins, while Biden tried to whisk Zellensky out so Ukraine would be without leadership and easy for Putin to seize Kiev. This guy is an incompetent partisan and is likely working for Russia as well.
1
@beverlykeys4330 .1 degree increase over the past 30 years isn't a crisis, but a campaign of lies Russia used to attack German nuclear power, to get Germany dependant on Russian oil/NG. Climate change is emotional trigger lies to get empaths to support self-destructive policies for independent energy of Russia.
1
@news2hedz227 He campaigned on getting the US out of stupid wars, but is the only President to protect US forces from Russian/Syrian battle group attacks over the Euphrates with a disproportionate escalation of response. The corporate media never mentioned it. Trump never mentioned it, just like he never mentions hiring black police officers for his security detail back in the day when NYC fired them. His actions don't fit your description, not even close.
1
@arthursine9870 He lied or misrepresented the facts throughout this interview: 1. Trump is the only US President who openly engaged Russian forces and supervised their annihilation in Syria when they attacked US SOF over the Euphrates. They spent 6 hours dropping precision-guided weapons on Russian Wagner Group mercenaries. 2. Trump provided Javelin ATGMs to Ukraine in large numbers to deter Putin from invading. 3. Trump communicated to Putin multiple times that if Putin invaded Ukraine, something terrible would happen to Russia. How anyone walks away from those facts thinking Trump enabled Putin points to some partisan mental gymnastics.
1