Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Donald Trump and America's Leadership by Tweet" video.
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
@DeirdreSM Herman Cain is one of the best leaders we could have had for the Presidency, due to his defense and business experience, measured temperament, and high intellectual faculties.
Obama was not a good student, not particularly smart, got Cs at Occidental University in LA, then got admitted to Columbia based on foreign student admissions, not academics for a US peer base.
I would never describe any of the men I mentioned as “throwing their own under the bus”. That’s literally what Obama did when black inner city community leaders tried to meet with him to get his support for their successful programs at dealing with fatherlessness, drugs, and crime.
Trump ran multiple, lengthy sessions with them within his first few months in office, and gave them his full support-more than the combined engagement of all White Houses before him.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's important to understand that Peter's reference for an optimally-functioning Presidency is that of George H.W. Bush, because he was the last one with an actual foreign policy.
Trump pulled off what nobody has been able to do in at least a century of Roosevelt-initiated Blue Blood control of the WH (and the crony relationship between Wall Street conglomerates and the political parties).
He circumvented the sell-out politician career path to the WH, bypassing Congressional, Gubernatorial, or cabinet positions (over a lifetime of fake public speaking and obedience to the financial interests who control both parties).
This is why Trump was hated and feared by both parties. There are dozens of Congressmen plugging away with the establishment system like good little conformists, eager to lick the boot of the financial interests who determine who makes it into the run-offs, who then not only got sidelined and politically eviscerated (especially Jeb Bush), but then faced a potential dynasty blocking them out.
Think about Cory Booker, Marco Rubio, Gavin Newsom, John Kennedy, Lisa Murkowski, Amy Klobuchar, etc.
There's a narrow window that opens at certain times, mainly determined by a combination of age, tenure, party affiliation relative to the cycle (RR, D, RR, D, RRR, DD, RR, DD, R, D), name recognition, previous campaign experience, Vice President, etc.
Trump threw all of that out of whack, which ruffled the feathers of dozens of career politicians in both parties.
Even worse for them, he commands such a groundswell of grassroots support, fomenting a rare populist cultural swing that hasn't happened since Reagan and FDR.
FDR's populism was created by crisis and mass control of the media. Trump's was created despite the established media, by leveraging the internet and his long career in business and entertainment.
The worst possible outcome for the establishment sell-outs in DC would have been a 2-term Trump, followed by whomever his VP would be in 2024 with his blessing.
This is why they threw everything at him possible, short of assassination like they did to Reagan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Vractis Obama wasn't afraid of GOP, but he was sensitive to being called out for the domestic spying and targeting of Tea Party PACs using the weaponized IRS, and the DOJ Fast & Furious gun-running operation to the cartels. He was very indifferent and distant even from career Senate Democrats who had been trying to do universal healthcate legislation since the 1970s. He didn't play DC two-step, instead secluding himself and watching TV, or calling staff meetings to learn about a matter. Valerie Jarrett and other behind-the-scenes actors got a lot of skullduggery done on-behalf of foreign governments.
The media ran huge cover for Obama, so we still don't hear about what extent the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians played.
The biggest attraction was to Uranium One, which Putin used after bribing the Clintons through Clinton Global Initiative, to help Putin re-build his nuclear arsenal.
Then there was the Iranian deal where they got billions of dollars on pallets, and the US got nothing.
PATRIOT Act was further cemented as a domestic political opponent spy program under Obama as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelboano7183 Someone groomed his rise to power, someone with motive and means bigger than the DNC. His actions in the WH were extremely injurious to the United States and our relations with out allies, while agitating and polarizing the US populace against itself.
Some relevant points about his family history....
Fact: Madelyn Dunham (Obama’s maternal grandmother) worked at the Boeing Wichita manufacturing facility on the B-17 and B-29 during WWII.
Fact: The B-29 Technical Data Package was compromised and transferred to the Soviets, (who had physical in-tact samples of B-29s from crash landings and diverts during the war, but needed technical data for materials and processes to make the clone/unlicensed Tupolev Tu-4).
Fact: Madelyn Dunham worked the night shift at Boeing’s B-29 manufacturing facility, and she and Stanley Dunham (her husband) can be seen in photographs where they are dining with Boeing executives from the plant at an exclusive table, where Madelyn is in the arms of one of the older men, far from Stanley Dunham.
Fact: Stanley Anne Dunham (Obama’s mother) was born 10 months after Stanley went off to serve in World War II.
Fact: The FBI was investigating who transferred the B-29 TDP to the Soviets from the Wichita plant, even after the war, narrowing-in on Stanley, even though he didn’t have access.
The more you look into the Dunhams, the more of a rabbit hole you will find. Their history is extremely strange, to say the least.
What is absolute is that a young Senator from Chicago with a doctored past, shot into the White House with an extremely short political record, a flimsy work history of being employed by a CIA financial intelligence front company (BIC), and a Constitutional Law professor.
The whole thing is extremely odd by any metric.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1