Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "India's Assassination Program in North America || Peter Zeihan" video.

@guvjdufici Russia has more to lose. US doesn't really care. As you said, India is one of Russia's biggest customers for arms and has been for generations. So who benefits by sabotaging US/Canada/Indian relations?
12
@kth6736 Americans have not been neck-deep in Indian politics ever, especially not in the 1970s. Indian politics have been way outside of the scope of any US awareness or interest.
11
@kth6736 And did that get any co-sponsorship or traction? Nobody has heard of it because it didn't have any real support. There are 435 Congressmen who propose token resolutions all the time to try to placate donors and special interests.
7
Who has the most to lose with a US-India partnership? Who has the ability to stir up surrogates to cause a knee-jerk reaction from the US and Canada? Remember what happened in Cuba when Trump tried to begin the process to normalize diplomatic relations with Cuba.
4
@kevinw2592 Opposite. Trump literally sent diplomats to begin normalization, and they were microwaved by the Russians. Russia will commit to very risky escalations to protect their "trampoline in Cuba. Obama is a Russian asset, and has been his whole life. Look who financed his Senate campaign and who his mother worked for.
2
@karandullet380 Russia has a lot to lose if US-India relations are strengthened, since India is Russia's biggest FMS customer.
2
@kth6736 Large parts of US government have never been obsessed with India. I've been involved with US foreign policy since the 1970s in the Defense, Aerospace, and Military sectors. Not only has the US not been interested, but we haven't even done small Foreign Military Sales to India, no major trade deals, no notable treaties, and very limited military exchanges that only recently happened since 2015. The reason for this is that India never wanted to be beholden to US trade policy, and India has been one of the 2 biggest FMS customers of the Soviets/Russians.
1
@satishkumarkn1164 Biden has been a Rus asset since 1972 at the latest, so that makes perfect sense. He has a cabinet full of traitors.
1
@tikz_patriot9207 So India supports Russian terrorist actions against sovereign nations?
1
@SunilMeena-do7xn The Soviets steered US activities through the CIA originally with very marginal support for Mujahideen in Afghanistan up until 1984. Then a sort of rogue Congressman and Central Asian Division CIA Chief went full-court press on Afghanistan wanting to break the Soviets. That's when the money really started flowing in to Pakistan. When the US originally sold daytime-only capable F-16As to Pakistan, the Pakis modified them to deliver nukes, so we ended the FMS sales because we weren't trying to escalate tensions between Pakistan and India. Pakistan rewarded us by helping China blowback the Mujahideen into the US, where they started killing people in Brooklyn, then were part of blowing up WTC 1 in 1993. My personal inclination is to develop friendly relations with India, not Pakistan and China, who have never been real friends of the US.
1
@SunilMeena-do7xn Why would the US hand over or sell critical defense and dual-use technologies to India when India has Russian technical advisors monitoring any tech imported to India? US semiconductors and computers are cutting edge, and would have elevated Russian military systems had we transferred them in large numbers to India. Apply that metric across the board and you understand why the US will remain cautious about technology transfers with India.
1
@truthseeker327 BRICS is a creation of the US. Notice how all those nations are either separated by thousands of miles and great ocrans, or are regional rivals with each other.
1
@SunilMeena-do7xn If you’re in bed with Russians, expect zero access to US technology and don’t cry about it.
1