Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Election Postmortem... || Peter Zeihan" video.
-
5
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sciencecompliance235 One of the most distasteful forms of contempt in America is the college- indoctrinated elites who think they know anything talking down to the technically- oriented and highly-trained working class, who have far better understanding of how things actually work.
A great example are veterans who go into any of the major sectors of the economy, especially energy, defense, IT, agriculture, small-medium business, or manufacturing as examples.
The college ignoramus will condescend to these people, having never been anywhere overseas, never cut payroll, never built anything with their hands or tools, never managed teams of people, never solved a real-world problem in their lives.
Intoxicated on the fumes of their own flatulence, they bloviate on the solutions to all of life's problems as if gifted with omniscience, completely unaware that they are truly uneducated and clueless about pretty much any topic.
1
-
@elysiumfields This is a great example of what I’m talking about. College kids in the US have been told a pack of lies by teachers and professors who have never lived in any Nordic country. My oldest son and daughter-in-law are going to school in one of those Nordic countries right now, where my mom is from. Education isn’t free. It’s very costly to everyone, namely the taxpayers. It’s also very exclusive, where gaining admission into university is extremely difficult. They section students off from each other at a certain time in school, so most go to skilled vocational training, and the more intellectually-minded kids with disciplined studying habits get to apply for university through entrance exams. Many take 2-3 times with the exams before they are admitted. Many do not complete their studies, then are in debt for the cost of schooling and housing. I’ve seen that happen to friends of mine as well.
When all is said and done, those countries rely on the US for their most advanced defense systems, medical diagnostic equipment, finances, trade, computer technology, software, and critical aspects of the economy all stemming from innovation mostly in the US or mainland Europe. Even with more GDP than comparable population US States, the US States with lower GDP have more Emergency Medical Systems, healthcare, transportation, finance, housing, higher education, PPP, etc.
But if we can leverage the inherent power of tariffs to fund limited government in the US, that would be far superior to what we’re doing now.
1
-
1
-
@elysiumfields Of the 30 countries I've been to, guess which one I've lived in the longest, besides the US? Finland. That's where my mom is from and where half my family lives right now.
We have a lot of relatives in Sweden as well, where I've also been multiple times.
The critical systems I'm talking about are aerospace & defense related, as well as medical. Finland is one of the biggest customers for US fighter aircraft, missiles, and weapons.
Finland could never build a fighter gas turbine engine, for example. Neither could Sweden, Norway, Denmark, or most of the countries in Europe, let alone the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, the thing he said about Trump “clearly failing” couldn’t be more wrong. How many politicians in US History could have ever done the amount of campaign rallies and planning sessions that Donald Trump did, even if they were in their 30s? Trump Jr. said he can’t keep up with him at age 46. Trump did all those events up through election night, didn’t go to sleep, then went straight into the cabinet formation meetings with a lot of people half his age that were wanting to take a break. Then if what Peter projects will be true, it’s as if Trump didn’t pick probability the greatest VP pick of all time, JD Vance. On top of that, he literally built his cabinet with a core of former Presidential candidates, including RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Vivek Ramaswamy. So Peter is orders of magnitude erroneous here on this alarmist forecast of a Constitutional crisis. In reality, it’s a Constitutional stabilizing movement, the likes of which have never been seen before in US Presidential history. No Republican President would ever surround themselves with former Democrat Presidential candidates like this, because Trump is an American President, not a partisan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1