Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Sweden In NATO (Recap) || Peter Zeihan" video.

  1. 2
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5.  @nole8923  It's more complex than that. I've lived in 8 different US States and 2 of the Nordic Countries, have citizenship in both the US & EU. If you have no life, quality of life doesn't matter and the Nordic countries don't respect your individual right to life as a human being, so you start off with a major eliminator criteria right off the bat. Scandinavia enjoys its security on the back of the American taxpayer, so that part is out of balance. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland benefit from hundreds of billions in US RDT&E on critical defense programs that they've been able to purchase without ever contributing a dime to the development of those systems. (F-16/F100, F/A-18/F404, F-35A/F135, AIM-7, AIM-9, AIM-120, APG-66, APG-68, APG-81 etc.) Saab Gripen uses US GE engine, servos, landing gear, brakes, and many of its subsystems so it isn't a domestic program as advertised. Advanced medical diagnostics systems, equipment, and drugs used in Scandinsvia were almost all developed and manufactured in the US. Transportation, telecom, satellite, and many other systems used to benefit the Nordic nations were mostly developed and made in the US. There have been things made in the Nordics that benefit the US in normal trade like Kone elevators and escalators, Nokia, and Ikea of course. US housing costs have sky-rocketed because foreign investors are buying up residential real estate to park their money in the US economy while generating monthly cash flow in billions, because the US economy is more stable than Europe's. I literally had a Finnish friend of mine die on an organ waiting list because the Finnish NHS deemed him not as worthy to receive a new liver. The NHSs in Scandinavia and Finland are a joke compared to what we have in the US. Taxes are out of control and purposely-punitive in Sweden and Finland to artificially depress the entire population for the purpose of social equality, which really handicaps the societies as a whole, making them dependent on the US for security because they neglect their defense budgets. Quality of life in the Nordics has more to do with geography and clean water from the lakes. When many people are able to have a summer cottage where they can get away from the cities, it's very healthy to be out in nature. You can say the same thing about Maine, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, many places in CA, UT, CO, WV, VA, and NC for cabins. It's an imbalanced comparison to pick tiny little populations of traditionally-homogenous Aryan peoples with 334 million Americans living in vastly-different geographic regions of the US. I found most of the claims about the Nordic nations to be childish propaganda fed to the people steadily to create a pacified and servile populace. As far as governments go, the Nordic nations are astonishingly-childish to watch in-action, with the multi-party divisions, lots of stupid leftist women, and low-T males who know precious little about the world or their own history in general. These are places where parliaments frequently resign en masse, and place defense of their nations at the lowest priority. They can't be taken seriously, which is sad to say coming from the US system where politicians have been owned by organized crime since the 1920s.
    1
  6.  @nole8923  Lived through all of that as well. Quality of life in many ways has improved in the US, while more stressors have been added so it’s not as black and white as some make it out to be. We were still under the threat of MAD, but the world was simpler with bi-polar super powers. 1960s US was one of the most chaotic periods in history, maybe only out-done by the Civil War. JFK, MLK, and RFK assassinations, riots, Vietnam War protests, LBJ WH policies, exclusion of blacks from much of the middle class sector they had worked into, and the beginning of the welfare state that ultimately destroyed the black family to beget waves of crime in the 1970s-1990s with fatherless black inner-city gangs and the cocaine epidemic. 1st half of the 1980s was still in recession from the terrible 1970s policies and global market forces with OPEC, along with a new wave of punitive government regulations on blue collar middle class in the US. FDR had no such protections, as he was a stooge for the organized crime families who took over in the 1920s, along with the socialists and Soviets in many ways. He transferred gargantuan amounts of US technology to Stalin and allowed Soviet Lend-Lease Generals to dictate policy to US manufacturers during the war. Financially collapse of 2007-2009 was created by Congressional welfare promotion politics that dictates to lenders to issue mortgages to people without bank accounts who normally wouldn’t qualify for a home loan. Banks that were smart got rid of those loans and people started bundling them as junk, which European banks bought up stupidly. The main people that needed to recover from 2007-2009 in terms of housing liabilities were the ones who took out variable rate mortgages and got taken when the bottom dropped out, and their payments went up. I wouldn’t describe that as the average American, since most mortgages already existed prior to that period. Your recollection is common to talking points from partisan class-warfare propaganda, which does not align with the completeness of the picture. I find the political parties do a terrible job of understanding domestic issues because it’s all about trying to tidy-up complex metrics into partisan angles. It gets even worse for foreign policy matters where they both really fall flat on their faces trying to see the world through tiny partisan lenses.
    1
  7. 1