Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Styxhexenhammer666" channel.

  1. 397
  2. 378
  3. 328
  4. 315
  5. 300
  6. 239
  7. 237
  8. 228
  9. 200
  10. 196
  11. 163
  12. 155
  13. 128
  14. 122
  15. 108
  16. 100
  17. 100
  18. 99
  19. 99
  20. 99
  21. 98
  22. 96
  23. 94
  24. 91
  25. 87
  26. 84
  27. 78
  28. 78
  29. 73
  30. 73
  31. 71
  32. 68
  33. 68
  34. 66
  35. 65
  36. 65
  37. 64
  38. 62
  39. 60
  40. 58
  41. 57
  42. 56
  43. 56
  44. 56
  45. 55
  46. 54
  47. 54
  48. 53
  49. 51
  50. 51
  51. 49
  52. 48
  53. 46
  54. 45
  55. 45
  56. 45
  57. 43
  58. 41
  59. 41
  60. 40
  61. 38
  62. 38
  63. 38
  64. 38
  65. The revisionism exploded with the 1619 Project at the NYT, which is the same paper that is still controlled by people that was once known as the Georgetown Set that goes back to the days of Wisner, where it was also known as the Wisner Gang. Guess what alphabet agency that leads to. "After the Second World War a small group of people began meeting on a regular basis. The group, living in Washington, became known as the Georgetown Set or the Wisner Gang. At the first[,] the key members of the group were former members of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)... Most men brought their wives to these gatherings. Members of what was later called the Georgetown Ladies' Social Club." [SIC] "The men shared similar political views. They tended to hold liberal views on domestic issues. These attitudes were developed while they were students in the 1930s. They were also passionate anti-communists. This was the result of the men's experiences during the wa[r]s and the events in Europe that followed the collapse of Nazi Germany in 1945. The vast majority were members of the Democratic Party but [two of them] were both left-wing Republicans. As [one female member] pointed out: "We were liberal anti-Communist, intellectuals, precisely the class and breed that... McCarthy hated and whose careers he wanted to ruin. It was the same old battle: the Republican right versus the Democratic left." [SIC] Now, the above is not quite true when they claimed to be anti-communists. They were anti-Stalinist, and only against "Soviet socialism." Most of them favored Trotskyism, and that's why McCarthy targeted them. This is why the media is pure propaganda today, and it was why the Smith-Mundt Act had been created in 1948, which was then gutted under president 44 during 2012-13.
    38
  66. 37
  67. 37
  68. 36
  69. 36
  70. 36
  71. 35
  72. 34
  73. 34
  74. 34
  75. 32
  76. 32
  77. 32
  78. 32
  79. 31
  80. 31
  81. 31
  82. 31
  83. 30
  84. 30
  85. 30
  86. 29
  87. 28
  88. 28
  89. 28
  90. 28
  91. 28
  92. 27
  93. 27
  94. 27
  95. 26
  96. 25
  97. 25
  98. 25
  99. 25
  100. 25
  101. 24
  102. 24
  103. 24
  104. 24
  105. 24
  106. 24
  107. 23
  108. 23
  109. A "well regulated militia" means a militia controlled by rules, as in a regiment, by forming troops of armed citizens in each state. It has nothing to do with the type of arms, (arms meaning any kind), except that each person was to keep and bear arms. The Federal Govt had no control over that after the Constitution was penned, and this same said government was not supposed to have a standing army. Any army was to be raised by the states, and for defense only. It was the Federalists that pushed for a standing army. During Adams, a Federalist, he purposely placed John Marshall as the CJ on the SC, and that started the downfall of the strict reading of constitutional law. His type of interpretation came back in 1939. "In 1939 the U.S. Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174. There, the Court adopted a collective rights approach, determining that Congress could regulate a sawed-off shotgun which moved in interstate commerce under the National Firearms Act of 1934 because the evidence did not suggest that the shotgun "has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia . . . ." The Court then explained that the Framers included the Second Amendment to ensure the effectiveness of the military." Cornell U. Miller could very well be overturned. 2nd Amend.: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The word, "State" in the 2nd Amendment does not describe the Fed. Govt, but one of the individual states under the constitution.
    23
  110. 23
  111. 22
  112. 22
  113. 22
  114. 22
  115. 22
  116. The revisionism exploded with the 1619 Project at the NYT, which is the same paper that is still controlled by people that was once known as the Georgetown Set that goes back to the days of Wisner, where it was also known as the Wisner Gang. Guess what alphabet agency that leads to. "After the Second World War a small group of people began meeting on a regular basis. The group. living in Washington, became known as the Georgetown Set or the Wisner Gang. At the first the key members of the group were former members of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)... Most men brought their wives to these gatherings. Members of what was later called the Georgetown Ladies' Social Club." "The men shared similar political views. They tended to hold liberal views on domestic issues. These attitudes were developed while they were students in the 1930s. They were also passionate anti-communists. This was the result of the men's experiences during the was and the events in Europe that followed the collapse of Nazi Germany in 1945. The vast majority were members of the Democratic Party but [two of them] were both left-wing Republicans. As [one female member] pointed out: "We were liberal anti-Communist, intellectuals, precisely the class and breed that... McCarthy hated and whose careers he wanted to ruin. It was the same old battle: the Republican right versus the Democratic left." Now, the above is not quite true when they claimed to be anti-communists. They were anti-Stalinist, and only against "Soviet socialism." Most of them favored Trotskyism, and that's why McCarthy targeted them. This is why the media is pure propaganda today, and it was why the Smith-Mundt Act had been created in 1948, which was then gutted under president 44 during 2012-13.
    22
  117. 22
  118. Spot on. There was a reason that several Republican Congressmen put forth a bill, twice, to remove the US from the UN, and the UN from US soil during the Trump Administration. The first instance occurred just after President Trump took office. It's about the establishment's corporations. All of this can be traced back to the first Earth Summit, and when the G5 was created under Nixon, though it had been building up since the creation of the Atlantic Charter. This is why the "globalists" are really "internationalists," and "atlanticists." Under Eisenhower's policy, which was kept classified for many years, it directed "spreading democracy" worldwide, by the use of force. That led to every US war, post-WWII, and the government's involvement with its ex-WWII enemies, (the Nazis), as well as the mob, to quash communism in other nations. Nixon, as the VP, hired the cutout, Robert Maheu, and set that ball rolling with Cuba. This was what John and Bobby uncovered, and it's what they had fought against, in agreement with the Old Right, led by Robert A Taft. The Old Right was what President Trump tried to bring back, and that's why the establishment tried to destroy him. The US and British corporations and governments, (the Anglo-American Establishment), have been behind everything that we've seen since then, including the formation of the EU, the NAU, and the AU, as well as one for Africa, and one for South America. One only needs to ponder, for a second, why people such as Escobar, Lehder, and Noriega claimed to be Nazis. That entire swamp started in the Bahamas, during WWII, and we had GHW Bush, a Nixon underling, using an oil company as a front, during the Cuba Project. British and American imperialism never died, they just renamed it.
    22
  119. 22
  120. 22
  121. 21
  122. 21
  123. 21
  124. 21
  125. 21
  126. 21
  127. 21
  128. 21
  129. 21
  130. 21
  131. 21
  132. 21
  133. 21
  134. 21
  135. 20
  136. 19
  137. 19
  138. 19
  139. 19
  140. 19
  141. 19
  142. 19
  143. 19
  144. 18
  145. 18
  146. 18
  147. 18
  148. 18
  149. 18
  150. 17
  151. 17
  152. 17
  153. 17
  154. 17
  155. 17
  156. 17
  157. 17
  158. 17
  159. 17
  160. 16
  161. "All of the people interviewed “claimed their group consisted of an alternate communal type life style made up of intellectuals who have chosen to live the way they do,” the FBI wrote. “The mothers were all aware that the children had been taken to Florida on a trip,” and said they trusted the two men who had been arrested. "One of the group members told investigators that the group was formed in 1972 “with the idea of responding to people in emergencies,” according to one of the files. “The group gathered information for people or companies” and was initially based out of 1307 4th Street, N.W., in Washington."__Epoch Times The location is very close to Dunbar Highschool in DC. 1972 was when Kissinger had Nixon ask Brezhnev to send the US his "oppressed Jews." Brezhnev opened the gulag doors and sent their finest criminals, the Vor (Russian mafia). Castro copied that action later. It was a time that the US had hard-left, communist, university students protesting Vietnam. Students whose mind had been warped by communists from Germany, Russia, and at home (such as by Herbert Marcuse). Note the mention of "communal type life." Communism is old, and its ideology can be found with the Quakers, Shakers, Mennonites, and Amish, as well as in some Unitarian religious immigrants. Babeuf turned that into a political ideology, the communiste, that Marx expanded upon. Marx and Engels were Babeufians. Its roots lay with the radical Hussites of Bohemia. The perversion was within the Hussite groups, such as the Neo-Adamites.
    16
  162. 16
  163. 16
  164. 16
  165. 16
  166. 16
  167. 16
  168. 16
  169. 16
  170. 15
  171. 15
  172. 15
  173. 15
  174. 15
  175. 15
  176. 15
  177. 15
  178. 15
  179. 15
  180. 15
  181. 14
  182. 14
  183. 14
  184. 14
  185. 14
  186. 14
  187. 14
  188. 14
  189. 14
  190. 14
  191. 14
  192. 14
  193. 14
  194. 14
  195. 14
  196. 14
  197. 13
  198. 13
  199. 13
  200. 13
  201. 13
  202. 13
  203. 13
  204. 13
  205. 13
  206. 13
  207. 13
  208. 13
  209. 13
  210. 13
  211. 13
  212. 12
  213. 12
  214. 12
  215. 12
  216. 12
  217. 12
  218. 12
  219. 12
  220. 12
  221. 12
  222. 12
  223. 12
  224. 12
  225. 12
  226. 12
  227. 12
  228. 11
  229. 11
  230. 11
  231. 11
  232. 11
  233. 11
  234. Ask yourself why the super rich favors CRT with the left. If the super rich will not pay tax, then why? CRT is a tool used by the super rich and left to lay the blame for taxes on today's black community. It's also a tool of white shame, which, I might add, hasn't worked, except on the most gullible. The wealthy, especially in the textile and garment industry, along with financing, have always been radical leftists. It's why they were some of the first corporations to offshore in Asia. Leftism is about exploiting nations, people, and their labor, and it has roots within the old planters and cotton. Who was the left's great savior, and their messiah? FDR? If he was so much for the poor, then why was his family not only wealthy, but so were his close friends such as the Astors on both sides of the pond? Why was his administration packed to the ceiling with radicals? Why was he cutting secret deals with the UK before the war, and what did he admit to Churchill about the US joining the war? Weren't they also working with the Rockefellers in NYC? Worse, what was the World Federalist Movement? Wasn't it founded by wealthy leftists from the US and UK? Did they not follow Trotsky's line of thinking? What about the Georgetown Set, which was packed with them, and those that claimed to leave the left for the right, known as the New York Intellectuals, and the Rockefeller Republicans? All Trotskyites? Why was Trotsky in NYC just before the fall of Czarist Russia? The World Federalists want a one-world big brother nanny state. It's what Jefferson warned about.
    11
  235. 11
  236. 11
  237. 11
  238. 11
  239. 11
  240. 11
  241. 11
  242. 11
  243. 11
  244. 11
  245. 11
  246. 11
  247. 11
  248. 11
  249. 11
  250. 11
  251. 11
  252. Some of those ancient groups' sacred rites supposedly involved having sex with a horse, and that made its way to Ireland at one time. This would have been with some of the so-called Barbarian tribes. From Giraldus Cambrensis' Topographia Hibernia: “There are some things which, if the exigencies of my account did not demand it, shame would discountenance their being described. But the austere discipline of history spares neither truth nor modesty. There is in the northern and farther part of Ulster, namely Kenelcunill [Tyrconnell], a certain people which is accustomed to consecrate its king with a rite altogether outlandish and abominable. When the whole people of that land has been gathered together in one place, a white mare is brought forward into the middle of the assembly. He who is to be inaugurated, not as chief, but as a beast, not as a king, but as an outlaw, embraces the animal before all, professing himself to be a beast also. The mare is then killed immediately, cut up in pieces, and boiled in water. A bath is prepared for the man afterwards in the same water. He sits in the bath surrounded by all his people, and all, he and they, eat of the meat of the mare which is brought to them. He quaffs and drinks of the broth in which he is bathed, not in any cup, or using his hand, but just dipping his mouth into it round about him. When this unrighteous rite has been carried out, his kingship and dominion has been conferred…” [SIC] In the Middle East, it was more about hierodoulēs or sacred pro####ution. Both, though, are tied to fertility. "In the temples of Ishtar, Astarte, Mâ, Anahita, and Aphrodite, for example, women, often virgins, offered themselves sexually to strangers. Sometimes the temples were staffed by such "sacred pro####utes." Their actions were ritual components of the cult of the goddess in question. In ancient Greece, the word for such women was hierodoulē, or "sacred servant." The term used here, hierodouleia ("sacred service"), refers to the ritual." "The Babylonian evidence indicates that a distinction between cultic and profane sexuality is both ancient and persistent. It is very possible that the distinction became blurred or perhaps even totally obliterated in the minds of most Westerners because in the Hebrew scriptures the term used for the cultic sexual activity of both male and female temple servants—znh, "to pro####ute oneself"—is also used to refer to apostasy (Hos. 2:7, 4:15; Jer. 2:20, 3:6, 3:8; Ez. 16:15, 23:3, 23:19; Is. 57:3). Sexual cultic activity became for the monotheist Yahvists synonymous with abandoning the worship of Yahveh and turning to false gods. Apostasy in the Bible is considered to be the worst of sins, hence terms referring to cultic sexual activity—pro####ution, harlotry, and whoredom —took on extremely negative connotations."__Encyclopedia Sorry about hiding a certain word, but you know that censorship.
    11
  253. 10
  254. 10
  255. 10
  256. 10
  257. 10
  258. 10
  259. 10
  260. 10
  261. 10
  262. 10
  263. 10
  264. 10
  265. 10
  266. 10
  267. 10
  268. 10
  269. 10
  270. 10
  271. 10
  272. 10
  273. 10
  274. 10
  275. 10
  276. 10
  277. 10
  278. 10
  279. Oh, you have no idea about how insidious this socialist movement is becoming. Research "institutional corruption." The program, which is tied to "institutional racism," was started at Harvard's law school, and they have brought their psychology department on board, which is filled with activists. They are attacking individualism in law. In other words, if one from within a group commits a crime, then they think the entire group is guilty for not saying anything, nor stopping it. That is the same slippery socialist slope used in Nazi Germany, and the old Soviet Union, which led to genocide. It also creates snitches, as their idea of prosecuting the group, (because they knew but did nothing wrong), is where it starts. In Nazi Germany, they blamed an entire ethnic group, because a few of them were involved in banking and the stock market. Of course, they ignored the people from their own group that were from within those same professions. You see, they blame the entire white race, because a small handful might be racists. Now, they're targeting individual responsibility, as well as looking at using social engineering to force a change. It is these very academics that pleaded to corporate America to work with them. Look for this video, which was held in Cambridge, MA back on October 8, 2009, by a Harvard professor: "Institutional Corruption - Opening Lecture." This is on the lessig channel, as he is the driving force behind this. This has been coming, and has been planned since at least 2009.
    10
  280. 10
  281. 10
  282. 9
  283. 9
  284. 9
  285. 9
  286. 9
  287. 9
  288. 9
  289. 9
  290. 9
  291. 9
  292. 9
  293. 9
  294. 9
  295. 9
  296. 9
  297. 9
  298. 9
  299. 9
  300. 9
  301. 9
  302. 9
  303. 9
  304. 9
  305. 9
  306. 9
  307. 9
  308. 9
  309. 9
  310. 9
  311. 9
  312. 9
  313. 9
  314. 8
  315. 8
  316. 8
  317. 8
  318. 8
  319. 8
  320. 8
  321. 8
  322. 8
  323. 8
  324. 8
  325. 8
  326. 8
  327. 8
  328. 8
  329. 8
  330. 8
  331. 8
  332. 8
  333. 8
  334. 8
  335. 8
  336. 8
  337. 8
  338. 8
  339. 8
  340. 8
  341. 8
  342. 8
  343. 8
  344. 8
  345. 8
  346. 8
  347. 8
  348. 8
  349. 8
  350. 8
  351. 8
  352. 8
  353. 8
  354. 8
  355. 8
  356. 8
  357. 8
  358. 8
  359. 8
  360. 7
  361. 7
  362. 7
  363. 7
  364. 7
  365. 7
  366. 7
  367. 7
  368. 7
  369. 7
  370. 7
  371. 7
  372. 7
  373. 7
  374. 7
  375. 7
  376. 7
  377. 7
  378. 7
  379. 7
  380. 7
  381. 7
  382. 7
  383. 7
  384. 7
  385. 7
  386. 7
  387. 7
  388. 7
  389. 7
  390. 7
  391. 7
  392. 7
  393. 7
  394. 7
  395. 7
  396. 7
  397. 7
  398. 7
  399. 7
  400. 7
  401. 7
  402. 7
  403. 7
  404. 7
  405. 7
  406. 7
  407. 7
  408. 7
  409. 7
  410. 7
  411. 7
  412. 7
  413. 7
  414. 7
  415. 7
  416. 7
  417. 7
  418. 6
  419. 6
  420. 6
  421. 6
  422. 6
  423. 6
  424. 6
  425. 6
  426. 6
  427. 6
  428. 6
  429. 6
  430. 6
  431. 6
  432. 6
  433. 6
  434. Shhhh, only the wealthy elite are supposed to know about the Maldives. Follow the earth's axial tilt. As that changes, the northern hemisphere warms and cools over a 40,000 year span due to where the sun strikes the earth. It's vice versa for the southern. There are orbital variations as well. Orbital Variations : "Changes in orbital eccentricity affect the Earth-sun distance. Currently, a difference of only 3 percent (5 million kilometers) exists between closest approach (perihelion), which occurs on or about January 3, and furthest departure (aphelion), which occurs on or about July 4. This difference in distance amounts to about a 6 percent increase in incoming solar radiation (insolation) from July to January. The shape of the Earth’s orbit changes from being elliptical (high eccentricity) to being nearly circular (low eccentricity) in a cycle that takes between 90,000 and 100,000 years. When the orbit is highly elliptical, the amount of insolation received at perihelion would be on the order of 20 to 30 percent greater than at aphelion, resulting in a substantially different climate from what we experience today." Obliquity (change in axial tilt) : "As the axial tilt increases, the seasonal contrast increases so that winters are colder and summers are warmer in both hemispheres. Today, the Earth's axis is tilted 23.5 degrees from the plane of its orbit around the sun. But this tilt changes. During a cycle that averages about 40,000 years, the tilt of the axis varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. Because this tilt changes, the seasons as we know them can become exaggerated. More tilt means more severe seasons—warmer summers and colder winters; less tilt means less severe seasons—cooler summers and milder winters. It's the cool summers that are thought to allow snow and ice to last from year-to-year in high latitudes, eventually building up into massive ice sheets. There are positive feedbacks in the climate system as well, because an Earth covered with more snow reflects more of the sun's energy into space, causing additional cooling."__NASA What a wicked web some weave for a power and money grab.
    6
  435. 6
  436. One will never uncover the true origins of the ancient Egyptian civilization via the scholars of the 21st century, nor from much of the 20th, especially after the out of Africa theory became mainstream. No matter what archaeological evidence shows, they have denied it and covered it up. Cairo's main Egyptologist, who is still loafing around the Valley of the Kings, is one of the ring leaders. All culture, in that area, can be traced back to the mountain people of Anatolia and the Caucasus, as well as the Urals. The ruling class came from the cattle herders, whereas the common people came from farming on the plains. The "mountain" is the key to it all, and so are the burial mounds. The mountain became the pyramid. They literally carved out their homes (caves), in the mountains. It also seems that the cattle herders, who would live in the mountains during the fall and winter, but migrate into the plains with their herds during spring and summer, got the gold bug. Gold, made into jewelry, is the "skin of the gods." North of the Caucasus, on the Pontic–Caspian steppe, it seems that the two cultures were literally divided by the Volga and Ural rivers, and the farmers (Arimaspi) liked to slip across to steal the gold from the herders. The herders, here, lived in the Ural mountains to the east, during the fall and winter. (Hint: Tribes were represented, symbolically, by mythical beasts.) Guess who the Griffin/Dragon represented? There was a similar beast for the ruling class in Mesopotamia and Persia, the Anzu and Shirdal. These were the warriors who first made use of the horse and created the first cavalries. They were known as "God's Whip" to those south of Anatolia in the Levant. They were the founders of civilization along the fertile crescent. If you ever wondered where those hidden gold mines of Midas and Soloman were, they were not in Africa, though it does have gold. To find the gold, you "go north." Those, from the north, used to raid the Egyptians and take their gold, though it was their own distant relatives that migrated there to form the Egyptian empire. The Egyptian slaves were a mixture of them and the Africans, which created the "dark-haired" people. The Fertile Crescent became a melting pot. The ruling Egyptian elite used to paint their bodies, which hid their identity. From carving out caves, to cutting stone. The Cyclopeans, who were never one-eyed. The tale of Polyphemus starts here.
    6
  437. 6
  438. 6
  439. 6
  440. 6
  441. 6
  442. 6
  443. 6
  444. 6
  445. 6
  446. 6
  447. 6
  448. 6
  449. 6
  450. 6
  451. 6
  452. 6
  453. 6
  454. 6
  455. 6
  456. 6
  457. 6
  458. 6
  459. 6
  460. 6
  461. 6
  462. 6
  463. 6
  464. 6
  465. 6
  466. 6
  467. 6
  468. 6
  469. 6
  470. 6
  471. 6
  472. 6
  473. 6
  474. 6
  475. 6
  476. 6
  477. 6
  478. 6
  479. 6
  480. 6
  481. 6
  482. 6
  483. Sadly, we've been stuck with one party hidden as two since 1952, and it's time for everyone to wake up to that fact. The public needs to realize that "neoconservatism" emerged in the thirties from within the pro-Soviet progressive D Party, and these "new conservatives" were anti-Stalinist Trotskyites, but still professed a belief in communism/socialism. Ron Paul exposed them in the House back in 2003. The neocons claimed that they were against "Soviet socialism," and broke away to infiltrate the R Party. That is where the likes of Henry Wallace came from, and the movement was thick in New York, where Dewey ran the Republicans. They were known as the "New York Intellectuals," and some of them were straight from the street gangs and mob. Dewey placed Ike and Nixon on the ticket, and backed them, which hurt the front runner, Taft, who was from the old or real conservative coalition, and America First. Taft lost, and the neocons came in with Ike and Nixon. It was they that supported FDR's New Deal socialism, and were behind restoring Wilson's failed League of Nations as the UN. The neocons and neoliberals are the internationalists, who wanted to spread their brand of Trotskyism around the globe. They hid it as spreading "liberal democracy," and they spread it at the end of a gun barrel. Ike's foreign policy paper, which was kept classified for many years, stated what they intended on doing, and they said it was to stop the spread of communism (Soviet socialism in reality). It was nation building while at war, and it started in Korea, which had already been running for two years before the election. Vietnam was next, and then came the other conflicts. The majority of what they did started with Nixon. It was he that formed the EPA and Earth Day, and started not only the green movement, but founded the G5/G7 at the White House, and set up the first Earth Summit to bring about the global warming scam. It was he that courted China. His underling, GHW Bush, signed the US up for their completed plan at Rio in 1992, and Clinton, a neoliberal, signed the UN treaty for it. It's time to clean house.
    6
  484. 5
  485. 5
  486. 5
  487. 5
  488. 5
  489. 5
  490. 5
  491. 5
  492. 5
  493. 5
  494. 5
  495. 5
  496. 5
  497. 5
  498. 5
  499. 5
  500. 5
  501. 5
  502. 5
  503. 5
  504. 5
  505. 5
  506. 5
  507. 5
  508. 5
  509. 5
  510. 5
  511. 5
  512. 5
  513. 5
  514. 5
  515. 5
  516. 5
  517. 5
  518. 5
  519. 5
  520. 5
  521. 5
  522. 5
  523. 5
  524. 5
  525. 5
  526. 5
  527. 5
  528. 5
  529. 5
  530. 5
  531. 5
  532. 5
  533. 5
  534. 5
  535. 5
  536. 5
  537. 5
  538. 5
  539. 5
  540. 5
  541. 5
  542. 5
  543. 5
  544. 5
  545. 5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. 5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 5
  557. 5
  558. 4
  559. 4
  560. 4
  561. 4
  562. 4
  563. 4
  564. 4
  565. 4
  566. There is only one way to stop an ever expanding government, and that is to allow it to collapse. Truthfully, the US became the head of the snake under Wilson, with he and Roosevelt's progressivism, which was nothing but hard line socialism. They created the League Of Nations to force it upon the world at the end of WWI. One thing that I give Reagan credit for, was that he supposedly wasn't a Trotskyite, (I can't find it in his history), though he was surrounded by them within the GOP. They were the neoconservatives, who had once been Democrats like him, and were anti-Stalinist Trotskyites who were supposedly against "Soviet Socialism," but were still communists. Their roots lie with the "New York Intellectuals," (which I call Kristol's kindergarten), and Nixon had been associated with them in law, politics, the mob, and Wall Street. The Bush family, which were Nixon underlings, were in deep with them, and the UN was their creation in 1945. Reagan had spied on them for the FBI, when he was the president of the Screen Actors Guild, and while in office, he fought the public sector labor unions, which is something a Trotskyite wouldn't do. However, he did buy into some of their economic policy about so-called free trade and deregulation (especially banking). The neocons and neoliberals (globalists) pushed that. Is it any wonder that there were attempts on his life, just as there were on 45 and his family? It was the neocons, in collusion with the neoliberal left and G7 nations, that tried to unseat 45, since nation building, and spreading "liberal democracy," has its roots in Marx and Trotsky's "permanent revolution." Leaving Afghanistan, collaring NATO and the UN, and creating Middle-Eastern peace runs counter to that. Targeting China and Russia with sanctions does as well.
    4
  567. 4
  568. 4
  569. 4
  570. 4
  571. 4
  572. 4
  573. 4
  574. 4
  575. 4
  576. 4
  577. 4
  578. 4
  579. 4
  580. 4
  581. 4
  582. 4
  583. 4
  584. 4
  585. 4
  586. 4
  587. 4
  588. Uranium One is treasonous. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, admitted that about 25% of the Uranium, which was shipped into Canada to be processed, went overseas to Europe and Japan, where it shouldn't have. On top of that, the transport company is the only one with the export license. "Mr. Christensen, 65, noted that despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada. "Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines. "The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of it." https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html It looks to me, that there are many who are in hot water over the deal.
    4
  589. 4
  590. 4
  591. 4
  592. It is well known that Lincoln was a Rosicrucian, and that he and his wife attended seances. However, the connection between him and predicting history by religion is connected to his assassination in the end. Read the books written by Gen. Thomas Maley Harris, as well as what was written by the Catholic priest that Lincoln represented in court before becoming president. Lincoln listened to what the Catholics were spewing from the pulpits to predict what was coming. The Catholics were fanning the flames of war in the south. The Roman Catholic Church had strong connections to the Confederate states and to Jefferson Davis. War funding for the south was laundered through the church from Europe, and the church was used as spies for the Europeans. Samuel Morse, who was a spy for the North, reported much of this to Lincoln. Morse had traveled Europe extensively up to the early 1830s, and knew of their feelings toward the US. Morse stated: ""We must first stop the leak in the ship through which muddy waters from without threaten to sink us." "Surely American Protestants, freemen, have discernment enough to discover beneath them the cloven foot of this subtle foreign heresy. They will see that Popery is now, what it has ever been, a system of the darkest political intrigue and despotism, cloaking itself to avoid attack under the sacred name of religion. They will be deeply impressed with the truth, that Popery is a political as well as a religious system; that in this respect it differs totally from all other sects, from all other forms of religion in the country." In fact, the RCC is what is left of the old Roman Empire, and still sees themselves as the head of it.
    4
  593. 4
  594. Years ago, during the 60s to 70s, a political scale was published by those that backed the politician, Robert A Taft, and those like him in 1952 (conservative coalition). See this link for that scale: https://i.imgur.com/SXtQDQc.jpg This is called the true political scale. . The public has been fed a lie since the 1952 election, about what Republicanism really is. The lie was conjured up by progressives and the left. The government had even crawled into bed with the NSDAP, and organized crime, after the war. That is well documented. . Robert A Taft was the last true Republican. They called him "Mr. Republican" in Congress. Compare his ideology with that of every Republican up to GW Bush after 1952. The GOP was completely taken over by progressives, just as the Democratic Party was. Progressivism is slow burn socialism, similar to that of the Fabian Society in London. . Taft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Taft . What happened? Dewey was a progressive. He knew that he couldn't win, and Taft was the front runner. Dewey asked Eisenhower to run as a Republican against Taft. Ike was an independent with progressive values. The GOP placed Nixon, another progressive, on the ticket with Ike, and they barely won. Their administration made sure to fan the flames of the UN, another progressive socialist operation. They also backed FDR's New Deal socialism. The same FDR that said he admired Fascism. . Look into Thomas E. Dewey's ties to the Saratoga Springs racetrack, and organized crime in New York. What did John and Bobby know?
    4
  595. 4
  596. 4
  597. 4
  598.  @terrymike7053  "Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism [in Europe] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy." My words in [brackets]. "Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties." That is what the US would have been under Federalism. Jefferson changed that. "Since the end of World War II in 1945, few parties have openly described themselves as fascist, and the term is instead now usually used pejoratively by political opponents. The descriptions neo-fascist or post-fascist are sometimes applied more formally to describe contemporary parties of the far-right with ideologies similar to, or rooted in, 20th-century fascist movements." Philosophical BS follows: "Roderick Stackelberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the political right by explaining: "The more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be." The problem is, that by nature, inequality exists, and they can't change that. Everybody is different, and that will never change. Below also shows Stackelberg's fallacy: "The "Fascist left" included Michele Bianchi, Giuseppe Bottai, Angelo Oliviero Olivetti, Sergio Panunzio, and Edmondo Rossoni, who were committed to advancing national syndicalism as a replacement for parliamentary liberalism in order to modernize the economy and advance the interests of workers and the common people." Here is the real nuts and bolts of it: "ANI members, including Alfredo Rocco, sought to institute an authoritarian corporatist state to replace the liberal state in Italy while retaining the existing elites... The ANI held ties and influence among conservatives, Catholics and the business community." The above paragraph is what the entire thing is actually about, and it's what we're seeing now. In Italy, some monarchists were also involved. In all, it's main objective was and is a merger between corporations and state. "A number of post-World War II fascist movements described themselves as a "third position" outside the traditional political spectrum. Spanish Falangist leader José Antonio Primo de Rivera said: "Basically the Right stands for the maintenance of an economic structure, albeit an unjust one, while the Left stands for the attempt to subvert that economic structure, even though the subversion thereof would entail the destruction of much that was worthwhile." "George Orwell wrote in 1944 that 'the word 'Fascism' is almost entirely meaningless ... almost any English person would accept 'bully' as a synonym for 'Fascist.'"
    4
  599. 4
  600. 4
  601. 4
  602. 4
  603. 4
  604. 4
  605. 4
  606. 4
  607. 4
  608. 4
  609. 4
  610. 4
  611. 4
  612. 4
  613. 4
  614. 4
  615. 4
  616. 4
  617. 4
  618. 4
  619. 4
  620. 4
  621. 4
  622. 4
  623. 4
  624. 4
  625. 4
  626. 4
  627. 4
  628. 4
  629. 4
  630. 4
  631. 4
  632. 4
  633. 4
  634. 4
  635. 4
  636. 4
  637. 4
  638. 4
  639. 4
  640. 4
  641.  @cinystarr4657  Oh, they have spun so many myths and lies since the War of 1812, which led to the split in the Democratic-Republican Party, that it's unbelievable. It's insidious in what they've done with fake history. What happened goes back to Madison having to create another national bank to repay the war debt of the War of 1812. The northern Federalists, whose party had died, joined this faction, where they split off creating the Whigs, and then later, they became the GOP under Lincoln. "The Democratic-Republicans later splintered during the 1824 presidential election. The majority faction of the Democratic-Republicans eventually coalesced into the modern Democratic Party, while the minority faction ultimately formed the core of what became the Whig Party. "The Democratic-Republican Party originated as a faction in Congress that opposed the centralizing policies of Alexander Hamilton, who served as Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington. "Madison succeeded Jefferson as president in 1809 and led the country during the largely inconclusive War of 1812 with Britain. After the war, Madison and his congressional allies established the Second Bank of the United States and implemented protective tariffs, marking a move away from the party's earlier emphasis on states' rights and a strict construction of the United States Constitution. The Federalists collapsed after 1815, beginning a period known as the Era of Good Feelings. Lacking an effective opposition, the Democratic-Republicans split into groups after the 1824 presidential election; one faction supported President John Quincy Adams, while the other faction backed General Andrew Jackson. Jackson's faction eventually coalesced into the Democratic Party, while supporters of Adams became known as the National Republican Party, which itself later merged into the Whig Party." By 1900, both parties had become infected with progressive Federalism, and much of it was spread by Christian Socialism from the pulpits, where these myths were spread through the north. NYC was the center of it, where, during the Civil War, Marx was writing to Lincoln, and Greeley was publishing Marx's screeds in his New York paper. When you study this history, and Lincoln, you find that the Civil War was never about slavery, but about the fight between two political schools of thought, that of Jeffersonian Republicanism, and Hamiltonian Federalism. Federalism was the big brother centralized government idea, and want, which the Jeffersonians had kept under heel until the Civil War. That was why the south seceded - taxation, government overreach, and the centralization of Federal power. Literally, what we're in the midst of, right now, is Reconstruction 2.0, which started in the fifties and sixties with the World Federalist Movement inside the UN.
    4
  642. 4
  643. 4
  644. 4
  645. 4
  646. 4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. 4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657.  @shanewebb3341  Yes, I do, when you read what he stated. He was pro-British, loved national banking, was pro-tariff, and pro-big business. That was what created the clash between them and the Old Republicans. I have no idea if he ever perceived it as becoming this huge, but I think he would have enjoyed it. "Federalist policies called for a national bank, tariffs and good relations with Great Britain as expressed in the Jay Treaty negotiated in 1794. Hamilton developed the concept of implied powers [Note] and successfully argued the adoption of that interpretation of the Constitution. [This ended the strict reading of the law]. Their political opponents, the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson, denounced most of the Federalist policies, especially the bank and implied powers; and vehemently attacked the Jay Treaty as a sell-out of republican values to the British monarchy. The Jay Treaty passed and the Federalists won most of the major legislative battles in the 1790s. They held a strong base in the nation's cities and in New England. They factionalized when President Adams secured peace with France, to the anger of Hamilton's larger faction. After the Jeffersonians, whose base was in the rural South and West, won the hard-fought presidential election of 1800, the Federalists never returned to power. They recovered some strength through their intense opposition to the War of 1812, but they practically vanished during the Era of Good Feelings that followed the end of the war in 1815. "The Federalists left a lasting legacy in the form of a strong federal government. After losing executive power, they decisively shaped Supreme Court policy for another three decades through Chief Justice John Marshall." Marshall was the one that began reading the written law as something else. "After an American delegation was insulted in Paris in the XYZ affair (1797), public opinion ran strongly against the French. An undeclared "Quasi-War" with France from 1798 to 1800 saw each side attacking and capturing the other's shipping. It was called "quasi" because there was no declaration of war, but escalation was a serious threat. At the peak of their popularity, the Federalists took advantage by preparing for an invasion by the French Army. To silence Administration critics, the Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. The Alien Act empowered the President to deport such aliens as he declared to be dangerous. The Sedition Act made it a crime to print false, scandalous, and malicious criticisms of the federal government, but it conspicuously failed to criminalize criticism of Vice President Thomas Jefferson. "Several Republican newspaper editors were convicted under the Act and fined or jailed and three Democratic-Republican newspapers were shut down. In response, Jefferson and Madison secretly wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions passed by the two states' legislatures that declared the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional and insisted the states had the power to nullify federal laws. [Principles of 1798]. "Undaunted, the Federalists created a navy, with new frigates; and a large new army, with Washington in nominal command and Hamilton in actual command. To pay for it all, they raised taxes on land, houses, and slaves, leading to serious unrest."__Wiki
    4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. 4
  663. 4
  664. 4
  665.  @wigletron2846  There is a group of people, some now very wealthy, and who are in the computing industry, which have decided to overturn all societial norms, including the idea of right and wrong. Of course, this idea is much older, and can be found within the early psychiatrists from 1945, such as Dr. George Brock Chisholm, a Canadian psychiatrist, and the first director of the WHO. Think UN, NATO, Internationalists, and Atlantacists when reading the rest below. Think Woodrow Wilson. Quoting The Canadian Encyclopedia about Dr. Chisholm: "Chisholm’s public platform had grown since the mid-1930s, through his lectures and speeches. He had also earned a reputation for courting controversy, which peaked in 1945 with his remarks in several speeches on parenting, education and morality. That October, in New York, his lecture on peace to the William Alanson White Foundation drew calls for his resignation from Cabinet ministers and more than 20 non-governmental organizations. Chisholm had attacked traditional morality and religious teachings for instilling guilt, fear and prejudice in children. In his view, these teachings produced immature adults incapable of free, rational thought and ultimately bound for war. Not all objected to his opinions: some journalists, prominent psychiatrists and the faculty of Queen’s University came to his defence [sic] over the White Foundation lecture. "The solutions Chisholm proposed for world peace could be authoritarian. In his 1945 acceptance speech for the Albert A. and Mary Woodward Lasker Award from the US National Committee for Mental Hygiene, Chisholm proposed that, as a short-term solution, a world police force could help keep peace by destroying any nation that started war. [Here, think NATO] "In November 1945, Chisholm delivered some of his most famous remarks in a speech to parents at the Rockliffe Home and School Association in Ottawa. The theme was similar to that of his speech the previous month: traditional approaches to child-rearing made world peace impossible. To make his point, he attacked the tradition of teaching children to believe in Santa Claus: “'Any man who tells his son that the sun goes to bed at night is contributing directly to the next war… Any child who believes in Santa Claus has had his ability to think permanently destroyed… Can you imagine a child of four being led to believe that a man of grown stature is able to climb down a chimney… that Santa Claus can cover the entire world in one night distributing presents to everyone! He will be a man who has ulcers at 40, develops a sore back when there is a tough job to do, and refuses to think realistically when war threatens.'” ====== Quoting Chisholm: "Conscience is what your mother told you before you were six years old.”__Brock Chisholm "What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of which we know anything? The only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality - the concept of right and wrong. The re-interpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all of psychotherapy.”__Brock Chisholm "...the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.”__Brock Chisholm
    4
  666. 4
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674.  @jitblues  He's another puppet in a long line of others that are directed by a cabal of international corporations and bankers that also work with the mob. Biden at Chatham House during Obama: "He outlines how a rule-based world order is struggling to keep pace with global change, and why he thinks globalization is fueling a sense among some that open economies and multilateral agreements are actually a raw deal. "He says even the most vocal defenders of the liberal international order - of which he is one - have to recognize the shortcomings of a system built more than 70 years ago, and that open societies are not self-sustaining but require attention and maintenance."__Chatham House In other words, that would be that he knew the public was dissatisfied with the Trilateral Commission and CFR's push for globalization via their "multilateral agreements," and that the UN's globalist sustainability plot would need modified. It was, behind the scenes during Trump by Biden's handlers. Also note the "Open Society" mentioned. George Soros et al. However, he and his puppeteers are doing exactly the opposite of what the public demands, especially with China and other nations. He's completely reversed course on what Trump had done with China, and allowed Russia to continue the Nord Stream 2, which will be used to control Europe. Worse, the US's energy independence is now kaput, he rejoined the Paris Agreement that is at the heart of the scheme, and the southern border is wide open. He's an empty suit, and his puppet strings lead back to the CFR.
    3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. The problem with today's younger adult population is that they have been brainwashed by the government since the nineties, have been kept on the teat of the welfare state, and have been sold a lie about US history starting from about 1824 until now. Well, most of us have, as US history scholars have lied by omission since about 1900, and placed our corrupt leaders upon pedestals. Some of the public even deifies our presidents while standing in awe before their large marble statues inside copies of Greek temples. They do this while not knowing that the truth about these men (Lincoln, Hamilton, et al) is almost the opposite of what they've been told, and this has occurred in our allied nations as well. In the US, it's been coined Hamilton's curse in a book with that title, and below is a snippet about it: "The Hamiltonian legacy wrested control into the hands of the federal government by inventing the myth of the Constitution’s 'implied powers,' transforming state governments from Jeffersonian bulwarks of liberty to beggars for federal crumbs. It also devised a national banking system that imposes boom-and-bust cycles on the American economy; saddled Americans with a massive national debt and oppressive taxation, and pushed economic policies that lined the pockets of the wealthy and created a government system built on graft, spoils, and patronage." Those that are too lazy to pick up a historical book by differing scholars, and believe everything they're told by Uncle Sam, have damned us all in the voting booths.
    3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. Funny that religion is brought up by the left, when it was religion, the Unitarians and similar, which led to radical left-wing thought. I also highly doubt that the left, today, can tell you the difference between classical liberalism, and what they consider liberalism, nor do they know the truth behind the founding of the Democrats. Worse, there are many on the left that attend the churches of several religions, especially Roman Catholicism, and the black community with the Baptists or Islam. . The GOP changed when Eisenhower was talked into running by Dewey, who was a globalist. Robert Taft was the last real Republican, and was known as "Mr. Republican." Taft wanted the US free of foreign entanglements, and was anti-globalist. Dewey, Ike, and Nixon were all globalists that pushed for the creation of the UN, and a cooperation with the ex-Nazis and mafioso ('Ndrangheta), just as many Democrats did. The UN is an Anglo-American project, whereby the US would be at its head, and be the "big brother" of Europe. It's why Ike was knighted in the Order of the Bath. Out of that came NATO, the WTO, and the Atlantic and Pacific Councils, which push globalism. The leftists haven't figured it out, yet, that no matter who you voted for, after Ike, except for JFK and Trump, you got the same beast, in either D or R. . Tricky Dick, as VP, was given the job of creating the darkest clandestine group in the new C_A, called Operation 40 and the 40 Committee, which has been renamed several times. This group is where Nixon's plumbers came from, as well as operations like Iran-Contra. It's the same Anglo-American operation, today, behind the riots, the election interference, the Russian hoax, and spying on every GOP candidate. Since JFK, President Trump has been the only one to tackle them, and that is why they want him out of office. The mafia and neo-Nazi connection with the anti-Trump crowd is huge. Globalists, Neocons, Neoliberals, and Progressives are all the same beast, yet, they wonder why we voted for Trump.
    3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. ​ @taylorc2542  Doing their jobs by stopping the spread of the Soviets. It was over the Church Committee, which came about due to communist activists stealing classified files, and making them public. That was what also later helped bring the School of the Americas down at Fort Benning. Carter claimed that new technology, which were computers and early satellites, would replace feet on the ground as the excuse. It didn't replace them, and it damaged the US. Remember the moniker that Comey used on Twitter, with the initials of RN? That man, with those initials, was a Trotsky following progressive pastor, and a professor at Columbia U with Dewey that taught the New York Intellectuals with the Frankfurt School professors, who had ideological followers consisting of Clinton, Humphrey, Acheson, Comey, Albright, McCain, Obama, and Carter. I'd bet both Bushes, and Cheney were as well. Think C Street. Comey stated in the New Yorker, that he had once been a communist, but claimed that he didn't know what he was now. He's a Trotskyite WASP. These same Trotskyites had infested the CIA early on, and all claimed to be anti-communists, when in reality, they were only anti-Stalinists, and against what they called "Soviet Socialism." Trotskyism is still a brand of Lenin's communism. Dewey even travelled to Mexico to "prove Trotsky's innocence" over the claims of Stalin. Stalin had Trotsky eliminated shortly after. This is the real roots of neoconservatism, as they were leftists that claimed to quit the D Party over Stalin.
    3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785.  @Nunya_Bidness_53  From the book: Paul, a Hellenistic Jew?: Paul's Youth and Early Years, by Peter van 't Riet "Many scholars and readers of the Bible have a romantic image of Paul: born in a pious Jewish family, educated in Jerusalem at the feet of the famous Pharisaic scholar Gamliel and fluently speaking Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek and Latin. However, does this fit in with the data from the genuine letters of Paul? In this book, the author shows that the above-mentioned image of Paul is especially derived from the Acts of the Apostles, in which the evangelist Luke has adapted the image of Paul to his own almost Pharisaic idea of the messianic time. In contrast, however, Paul himself presents a completely different Christology (doctrine about Christ) in his letters. His language and way of thinking are more cognate with the Hellenistic, Greek-speaking Judaism of his days. The author discusses successively: 1) Hellenism, the dominant culture of the Greek-Roman world of those days; 2) the Hellenistic Judaism of the Diaspora, which differed greatly from the Aramaic Judaism of Jesus and his early disciples; 3) the Septuagint, the Greek Bible translation, which had already existed about 300 years in the days of Paul and which deviated in many respects from the Hebrew Bible. Next, the author researches what of these three phenomena could be found in the letters of Paul. Which turned out to be a lot more than he presumed at the start of his research. The Hellenistic Judaism is so intertwined with Paul’s thought that the most obvious conclusion is that Paul has spent his youth and early years in a Hellenistic-Jewish milieu. This background clarifies many difficult passages in the letters of Paul and leads to a better understanding of his theology."
    3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800.  Trevor Guthrie  I read a political article several years ago, but I can't remember where, that said the forces of both national and international socialism had joined forces within the CFR. That would explain how they joined forces, and infiltrated Perot's Reform Party, as well as the D and R. Trump admitted in that NYT interview, that he merely used the Reform Party to try his hand at politics. He quickly learned what was within it, and left, along with Ventura, stating that he wanted nothing to do with it. In 2016, we saw the same people form together under the D Party, with the likes of Obama, HRC, and Bernie. Once Trump was in office, starting in June 2017, indictments and arrests started occurring, nailing the likes of of these crackpots, who were also tied to the Russian mob, and the Levant. If they seem cultish, one only needs to read about Fred Newman. The press considered his group a cult of socialist extremists. There was a sexual aspect of this cult as well. Jesse Jackson was involved with this lot, from what I found, and I'd say Obama was as well. Some can't grasp the politics in the Levant, where there are hard left and hard right beliefs. After all, how could someone from there believe in National Socialism, but some did, and still do. Think RM, GM, and JE. The Internationalists/communists were within the first settlers, who started the kibbutzim. The national socialists came in later on, and they were friendly with the Arabs over the old Ottoman Empire, which had sided with Germany. This lot was also tied to Central and South America, as well as the Caribbean, and they had many friends within the US and what became the Russian mob. There is a middle or moderate politic there as well, which is similar to US beliefs.
    3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. When you mentioned allowing the leftists to rant, there is and old saying that matches that, which is: "give them enough rope, and they will hang themselves." I do that all the time. Then, when you question them, they hardly ever have anything close to a credible answer, if any answer at all. Two of my favorites, are when they call Trump a racist or Steve Bannon an anti-Semite, when I have never heard Trump utter one truly racist comment, and there are more Jews working at Breitbart than you can shake a stick at. When one points to the evidence against it, the leftists always go off the deep end. Their lunatic theory, is that Trump is a racist because he hired Bannon, and Bannon is an anti-Semite, because he wanted his child to attend a Catholic school instead of a Jewish school. His ex-wife, Mary Louise Piccard, made a bunch of statements during their divorce, where she did her best to make him look bad in order to win a good bit of money. If he hated Jews as she claimed, he worked with many, and they have all had many good things to state about him. Any, who have went through a divorce, know how vindictive a woman can be. I sure do. There is a video out, that promotes today's millennial leftists to a tee. It was shot at a lecture hall, where a rather plump girl, (probably 300 pounds), tried to do an imitation of the fat child and the "peanut butter and jelly time" jingle. She performed her defiant act, flapping arms and all, over her disagreement with freedom of speech. I guess they needed to take her to a safe space, and give her time with a therapy dog and crayons afterwards. It was quite the psychotic display of a full-blown temper tantrum, that any three year old would be proud of.
    2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. Morality and chivalry are dead on the left. To this day, I open doors for women, make way for them, and am polite, no matter the race, nor whether a feminist hates it or not. The left has lost all sense of morality, and to be honest, the ones who write this muck, such as Greg Howard, have many tells which show them to be a sociopath. For that matter, most of the Democrats actions show them to be sociopaths. Sociopathy: Grandiose sense of self. They think that they are entitled to things, and claim them as their own. They think that it is their right to do so. The think that they are somehow special. When confronted, they don't find anything wrong with their actions. They can manipulatively turn the tables, making it sound as if others are the selfish ones. They have a sense of self-righteousness. They are mischievous, cunning, and have behavioral problems. A sociopath lies so often that it becomes a part of their personality. They appear to be satisfied by their anti-social behavior. They're irresponsible and unreliable. They are not interested in others lives, needs, or others safety. They're oblivious to the damage they cause. They quickly accuse others of being guilty, even though the action is of their own doing. They lack realist visions of the future. Poor behavioral controls, and an impulsive nature. They switch between peace and rage. They are guilty of violent assaults on other people They are unable to feel guilt, shame, or remorse. They think that the ends justify the means. They have no problem causing devastation to others, as long as they reach their outcome. They have shallow emotions and lack empathy. Compare that to the recent actions of those who claim to be Democrats.
    2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. The word, devil, is bastardized Greek by the early German translators. They were trying to translate and pronounce the Greek word, Diabolous, that in English is Diabolic or Diabolical, which means a deceiver or a liar. There are three words in the KJV Bible, that are purposely not translated into English, and two in the Catholic version. The first word is Satan, which is a Hebrew word, and as a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. Satan was not the angels name in Job, as it was written as "ha-satan" in Hebrew that means "the satan," which was the job title that God gave the angel. The angel's name is unknown. In Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. In Matthew 16:22-23, Jesus called Peter a satan (adversary) and a stumbling block, he was not calling him a fallen angel or demon. Mainstream Rabbinical Judaism, that of the Pharisees, has never believed in a fallen angel named Satan. This myth was started by Persian Zoroastrianism and the Greco-Romans. The second word was Devil, which was discussed above. The third word, which only appears once in the KJV, is Lucifer. Lucifer is a Latin word, which means Morning Star, Son of the Morning, Light Bearer, and the planet Venus. It was used several times in the Latin Vulgate, and not once did it equate a fallen angel or a satan. Jesus was called this twice, within the Bible, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia. Venus, or the Morning Star, only comes into view just before sunrise, and disappears with the sun. Those who rose quickly in fame and renown, and died an early death, were called this. Thus, the King of Babylon (see Isaiah 14:4), was called this at Isaiah 14:12, and so was Jesus Christ at Revelation 22:16. The newer Catholic bibles, which are supposedly translations of the Latin Vulgate, replace the word devil with demon, even though the old original Latin bibles, printed in Germany, have devil, and it is said, it is diabolous the original Latin scrolls. If you change these three words with their proper definitions, you will find that the New Testament is actually speaking about something totally different than what you first thought.
    2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. The hatred of regular Freemasonry by Catholics is due to Protestantism. Fraternal Freemasonry is based upon the reformist movement, even though the original Masonic Constitution states it is of the Catholic religion, which was written by a Presbyterian minister. It's due to the Anglican church, which still considered itself Catholic in its rites, except the monarch of the UK is the head and not the pope. Thus, it is considered by Rome to be Protestant. Henry VIII brought that about. The fraternity was formed in 1717 by four London Lodges that were out of work, and they now had several elderly masons needing financial help. They formed what later became the United Grand Lodge of England, the Mother, and Premiere Lodge, and the fraternity was set up as a pension and as a charity to help poor and distressed Masons, their widows, and orphans. Operative Masons work from the Guild Hall in the City. The fraternity is not connected to the guild. The Grand Lodge is also built outside the wall. The basis, or work, of the fraternity, is to "make good men better." It teaches that man is a temple for which God dwells within, via his soul, and that he should always be a just and upright person. The symbology and allegory lead one to the Pilgrims Path, and by studying the symbology, you will find the truth about all religions. That is why Freemasonry has groups that study comparative religion. Most do not make this long journey. If you journey close to the end, as I did, you will never see religion, nor the three estates, in the same light again. You will know the truth. This is what the Catholics, Jews, Muslims, and many other religions wish to keep hidden. As far as the Scottish Rite, it is an appendant Rite, and it is a separate organization or legal corporation, just as is the York Rite. To join them, though, one must be a Master Mason. You are not required to join either. Both rites are nothing but extra lessons, or degrees, which reveal more by allegory and symbology. Starting with the 15th, which is the start of the Knights, it is most definitely Christian oriented. At the top, which are the 32nd and 33rd degrees in regular Freemasonry, the secret is that all men are both good and bad, are of a dual nature, and that there must be a balance, just as in nature. In either direction, from the middle, chaos lies due to zealotry and radical ideology. The Pilgrim takes the center path where the scales are balanced.
    2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. All of today's religions have a single root, and it was at the Pontic Steppe. It was there with the start of language, the tribe, and civilization, and it is tied to the cattle herders of the mountains, as the ruling elite, and the wheat farmers of the plains. That early language, religion, and civilization spread both east and west, and then, south. It's origins, it is thought, lie with the peoples on either side of the Volga, just south of where it forks at the southern end of the Urals (around Samara). The farmers lived to the west of the river, and the cattle herders to the east, closer to the mountains. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samara The mountain dwellers, who once lived in carved caves from Anatolia to the Caucasus and Urals, came out onto the plains, and began herding and farming. Language starts here, as well as religion, based upon the tribe. The farther away from the point of origin, culture caused changes in that religion, and brought differing beliefs. That leads us to today. The mountain has had deep connections to religion, as rites were performed on top of them, as well as on top of the burial mounds. This leads to the tale of Polyphemus, and this religion was also behind the pyramids built on the plains. This ancient religion was with the first four civilizations, which were the people on both sides of the Caucasus, which leads to the Fertile Crescent, the Indus River valley, China, and Peru. Even though some scholars may deny it, it was the same religion in all four areas. Peru's civilization didn't rise on its own.
    2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. Holt is the worst form of capitalist. "Their" type of capitalism is what gave capitalism a bad name, and it's the same group that injected skin color into the definition of race. Sugar plantations are where all of that originated. One might ask Holt about the time his lot joined forces with the "other" socialists and environmentalists. CFR members exposed it, as did Trump in 2000 on the Today Show. The worst dregs of society; international and national socialism making a pact with the tree-huggers. "Trump considered himself a conservative, but criticized Pat Buchanan, saying: 'I'm on the conservative side, but Buchanan is Attila the Hun.' He withdrew from the race citing the party's infighting, as did Jesse Ventura and the Minnesota Reform Party. Donald Trump stated: 'So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.'" "Pat Buchanan decided to leave the Republican Party because: 'The Republican Party at the national level has ceased to be my party. This divorce began around the end of the Cold War when President (George H W) Bush declared it to be a New World-order party and began intervening all over the world. While he and I were allies and friends during the Cold War, I just felt that once the Cold War was over the United States should return to a more traditional non-intervention foreign policy.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America The Soros Red-Green-Brown Alliance.
    2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009.  @sylviam6535  Yes, but using gas successfully in a US made firearm was Browning's idea, where he used a cone-shaped flapper mechanism on the muzzle to actuate a lever-action firearm, and then, he designed the Potato-Digger and the BAR. That idea was further developed by Winchester, after Browning joined them, which led to the creation of the M1 Carbine, and the Garand at Springfield. "Winchester developed the .30 Carbine cartridge for the ordnance department. Winchester at first did not submit a carbine design, as it was occupied in developing the .30-06 Winchester M2 military rifle. The M2 rifle originated as a design by Jonathan "Ed" Browning, brother of the famous firearm designer John Browning. A couple of months after Ed Browning's death in May 1939, Winchester hired David Marshall "Carbine" Williams who had begun work on a short-stroke gas piston design while serving a prison sentence at a North Carolina minimum-security work farm." Nazi Germany obtained their ideas from several designers going back to the mid-1800s, where a German first used the idea to operate the action of a single-shot breech-loading rifle. That was patented in the US and Britain, but it was all pre-Nazi. History: "The first mention of using a gas piston in a single-shot breech-loading rifle comes from 1856, by the German Edward Lindner, who patented his invention in the United States and Britain. In 1866, Englishman William Curtis filed the first patent on a gas-operated repeating rifle, but subsequently failed to develop that idea further. Between 1883 and 1885, Hiram Maxim filed a number of patents on blowback, recoil, and gas-operation. In 1885, one year after Maxim's first gas-operated patent, a British inventor called Richard Paulson, who a year before had patented a straight blowback-operated rifle and pistol, patented a gas piston-operated rifle and pistol which he claimed could be used with sliding, rotating or falling bolts. He would also patent a gas-operated revolver in 1886. It is not known whether Paulson ever constructed prototypes of his patents, but according to A. W. F. Taylerson, a firearms' historian, his patented revolver was probably workable. In the 1880s a gas piston-operated rifle and pistol were developed by the Clair Brothers of France who received a French patent and submitted prototypes for testing by the French army in 1888, although the true date of their invention is uncertain. They would also produce a semi-automatic shotgun in the early 1890s. In 1889, the Austro-Hungarian, Adolf Odkolek von Újezd, filed a patent for the first successful gas-operated machine gun." "Most current gas systems employ some type of piston. The face of the piston is acted upon by combustion gas from a port in the barrel or a trap at the muzzle. Early guns, such as Browning's "flapper" prototype, the Bang rifle, and Garand rifle, used relatively low-pressure gas from at or near the muzzle. This, combined with larger operating parts, reduced the strain on the mechanism. To simplify and lighten the firearm, gas from nearer the chamber needed to be used. This high-pressure gas has sufficient force to destroy a firearm unless it is regulated somehow. Most gas-operated firearms rely on tuning the gas port size, mass of operating parts, and spring pressures to function. Several other methods are employed to regulate the energy. The M1 carbine incorporates a very short piston, or "tappet." This movement is closely restricted by a shoulder recess. This mechanism inherently limits the amount of gas taken from the barrel. The M14 rifle and M60 GPMG use the White expansion and cutoff system to stop (cut off) gas from entering the cylinder once the piston has traveled a short distance. Most systems, however, vent excess gas into the atmosphere through slots, holes, or ports." "A gas trap system involves "trapping" combustion gas as it leaves the muzzle. This gas impinges on a surface that converts the energy to motion that, in turn, cycles the action of the firearm. As the resulting motion is forward toward the muzzle of the gun, some sort of mechanical system is needed to translate this into the rearward motion needed to operate the bolt. This adds to the complexity of the mechanism and its weight, and the placement of the trap generally results in a longer weapon and allows dirt to easily enter the mechanism. Despite these disadvantages, they used relatively low pressure gas and did not require a hole in the barrel, which made them attractive in early designs. The system is no longer used in modern weapons. "Hiram Maxim patented a muzzle-cup system in 1884 described in U.S. Patent 319,596 though it is unknown if this firearm was ever prototyped. John Browning used gas trapped at the muzzle to operate a "flapper" in the earliest prototype gas-operated firearm described in U.S. Patent 471,782, and used a slight variation of this design on the M1895 Colt–Browning machine gun "potato digger". The Danish Bang rifle used a muzzle cup blown forward by muzzle gas to operate the action through transfer bars and leverage. Other gas-trap rifles were early production M1 Garands and German Gewehr 41 (both Walther and Mauser models). "The American and German governments both had requirements that their guns operated without a hole being drilled in the barrel. Both governments would first adopt weapons and later abandon the concept. Most earlier US M1 Garand rifles were retrofitted with long-stroke gas pistons, making the surviving gas trap rifles valuable in the collector's market." Thus, the WaPo writer is a liar.
    2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012.  @JLCL01  The agrarians back then were wheat farmers, and their mainstay diet was bread, beer, and wine. The nomads, of course, were the meat eaters, but they also dined on bread, and drank beer and wine. They would barter between each other, and there is ancient tales about the nomads being the cyclopeans. It was said that the agrarians would swim across the river at night, to steal gold from the nomads, who first made use of it. This ancient tale originates, it's said, from the Volga river area and Persia, and it came to Greece, where it was mangled into the people having one eye, which they didn't. It's is thought that this was a Greek mistranslation for the Arimaspi (horse lover). The tale of Polyphemus is thought to have its roots here. The agrarians would run short on seed for a multitude of reasons, after the first civilizations sprang up, which had the grain banks. Many believe that the ziggurats other use was a grain bank (granary), which is why it's symbolized on fiat currency (debt or loan), along with wheat. Thus, they would borrow the grain, and pay it back after the harvest. That was the roots of banking and pawn. Those that couldn't, probably had to result in going back to their hunter gatherer days, digging for root vegetables, and living off fruits, etc, in the wild, and make due. I'm sure they hunted as well, just as do the remaining hunter gatherers in Africa, today. This communist agrarian cult is behind the green movement, which pushes veganism. It is an attack on what they see as ancient capitalism. In reality, the entire lot of them, from their early religious origins, are utterly uneducated nut cases with an equality complex.
    2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030.  Arabs are Semites, Jews are Scumites  It's not capitalism, per se, as long as it's well regulated, but the amoral who take advantage of it. Capitalism is banking, and the lending of money, but there are many dirty and dark people involved that corrupt it. The large corporations, and the CEOs behind this, are completely amoral. It goes back to the formation of the mob in the US, and the amoral robber barons before that. Read the article titled: Bacchanalia 2.0, at Vanity Fair, about big tech's CEOs. They are pushing this amorality today. The mob, though, really helped push this along, as they pushed the amoral "profit-any-way-you-can" agenda, and controlled the labor unions after they stripped their pensions for "investment." Their corrupt banks, and their investment funds, also financed much of today's big tech with startup capital. What became known as the Russian Mob, or the Vor, came out of this lot, as well as did the oligarchs. A multi-year investigation was started by the Belgium Secret Service, which came out in their Atlas report in the mid-nineties. They showed that this lot of the mob, CEOs, and world politicos had reached the "fourth stage" of money laundering (absolute control), and that they estimated that the cabal now controlled 50% of the world's economy. They also said that the worst of it had began in the early seventies. (See below) The UK, Switzerland, and several micronations are at the heart of it, over secrecy jurisdictions, and shell companies. That idea was brought into the US as well after the seventies. From the Atlas Report: "To comprehend this nebula, it is necessary to abandon traditional financial or political logic; this is not merely a question of nation, political party, or of ordinary economics. "Our conclusion would be that at least over the last twenty years, the economic powers, some of which m###a types, have allied themselves with political forces and organized c######l structures, and reached the 4th stage of money laundering, namely, Absolute Power. It has been specified to us that at the present moment these characters control 50% of the world economy." One can lay it all at the feet of the greedy and amoral, who took advantage of lending, and the dark unregulated secrecy banking structure that they set up after WWII, which was based upon the Swiss model of numbered accounts from the thirties.
    2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. Professor Carroll Quigley's interview with the Washington Post: "I learned the Round Table Group was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975) Also from Quigley: "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I...was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." __Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p.950 "At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York, it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." __Professor Carroll Quigley, pp.951-952 From Dan Smoot's book "The Invisible Government" on what has led to today's Europe: "In September, 1916, Wilson (at the urging of House) appointed a committee of intellectuals (the first President's Brain Trust) to formulate peace terms and draw up a charter for world government. This committee, with House in charge, consisted of about 150 college professors, graduate students, lawyers, economists, writers, and others. Among them were men still familiar to Americans in the 1960's: Walter Lippmann (columnist); Norman Thomas (head of the American socialist party); Allen Dulles (former head of C.I.A.); John Foster Dulles (late Secretary of State); Christian A. Herter (former Secretary of State). "These eager young intellectuals around Wilson, under the clear eyes of crafty Colonel House, drew up their charter for world government (League of Nations Covenant) and prepared for the brave new socialist one-world to follow World War I. But things went sour at the Paris Peace Conference. They soured even more when constitutionalists in the United States Senate found out what was being planned and made it quite plain that the Senate would not authorize United States membership in such a world federation. "Bitter with disappointment but not willing to give up, Colonel House called together in Paris, France, a group of his most dedicated young intellectuals–among them, John Foster and Allen Dulles, Christian A. Herter, and Tasker H. Bliss–and arranged a dinner meeting with a group of like-minded Englishmen at the Majestic Hotel, Paris, on May 19, 1919. The group formally agreed to form an organization "for the study of international affairs." "The American group came home from Paris and formed The Council on Foreign Relations, which was incorporated in 1921. "The purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations was to create (and condition the American people to accept) what House called a "positive" foreign policy for America–to replace the traditional "negative" foreign policy which had kept America out of the endless turmoil of old-world politics and had permitted the American people to develop their great nation in freedom and independence from the rest of the world. "The Council did not amount to a great deal until 1927, when the Rockefeller family (through the various Rockefeller Foundations and Funds) began to pour money into it. Before long, the Carnegie Foundations (and later the Ford Foundation) began to finance the Council. "In 1929, the Council (largely with Rockefeller gifts) acquired its present headquarters property: The Harold Pratt House, 58 East 68th Street, New York City. "In 1939, the Council began taking over the U.S. State Department. "Shortly after the start of World War II, in September, 1939, Hamilton Fish Armstrong and Walter H. Mallory, of the Council on Foreign Relations, visited the State Department to offer the services of the Council. It was agreed that the Council would do research and make recommendations for the State Department, without formal assignment or responsibility. The Council formed groups to work in four general fields–Security and Armaments Problems, Economic and Financial Problems, Political Problems, and Territorial Problems. "The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to finance, through grants, the operation of this plan. "In February, 1941, the Council on Foreign Relations' relationship with the State Department changed. The State Department created the Division of Special Research, which was divided into Economic, Security, Political, Territorial sections. Leo Pasvolsky, of the Council, was appointed Director of this Division. Within a very short time, members of the Council on Foreign Relations dominated this new Division in the State Department. "During 1942, the State Department set up the Advisory Committee on Postwar Foreign Policy. Secretary of State Cordell Hull was Chairman. The following members of the Council on Foreign Relations were on this Committee: Under Secretary of State Sumner Welles (Vice-Chairman), Dr. Leo Pasvolsky (Executive Officer); Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Isaiah Bowman, Benjamin V. Cohen, Norman H. Davis, and James T. Shotwell. "Other members of the Council also found positions in the State Department: Philip E. Mosely, Walter E. Sharp, and Grayson Kirk, among others. "The crowning moment of achievement for the Council came at San Francisco in 1945, when over 40 members of the United States Delegation to the organizational meeting of the United Nations (where the United Nations Charter was written) were members of the Council. Among them: Alger Hiss, Secretary of State Edward R. Stettinius, Leo Pasvolsky, John Foster Dulles, John J. McCloy, Julius C. Holmes, Nelson A. Rockefeller, Adlai Stevenson, Joseph E. Johnson, Ralph J. Bunche, Clark M. Eichelberger, and Thomas K. Finletter. "By 1945, the Council on Foreign Relations, and various foundations and other organizations interlocked with it, had virtually taken over the U.S. State Department. "Some CFR members were later identified as Soviet espionage agents: for example, Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie. "Other Council on Foreign Relations members–Owen Lattimore, for example–with powerful influence in the Roosevelt and Truman Administrations, were subsequently identified, not as actual communists or Soviet espionage agents, but as "conscious, articulate instruments of the Soviet international conspiracy.""__The Invisible Government, by Dan Smoot (1965) This is how Europe so easily supports Socialism, as the US led Anglo-American Establishment supports them. Essentially, European nations became vassal states to the US after WWII under the CFR, RIIA, UN, NATO, and the Atlantic Council. The CFR/RIIA world federalist clique are at the heart of it all, and have been since their creation at the end of WWI.
    2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103.  @danmoritz3319  "After 1816, the Federalists had no national power base apart from John Marshall's Supreme Court. They had some local support in New England, New York, eastern Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware. After the collapse of the Federalist Party in the course of the 1824 presidential election, most surviving Federalists (including Daniel Webster) joined former Republicans like Henry Clay to form the National Republican Party, which was soon combined with other anti-Jackson groups to form the Whig Party in 1833. By then, nearly all remaining Federalists joined the Whigs. However, some former Federalists like James Buchanan, Louis McLane, and Roger B. Taney became Jacksonian Democrats. "The "Old Republicans", led by John Randolph of Roanoke, refused to form a coalition with the Federalists and instead set up a separate opposition since Jefferson, Madison, Gallatin, Monroe, John C. Calhoun, and Clay had in effect adopted Federalist principles of implied powers to purchase the Louisiana Territory and after the failures and lessons of the War of 1812 raised tariffs to protect factories, chartered the Second National Bank, promoted a strong army and navy and promoted internal improvements. All these measures were opposed to the strict construction of the Constitution, which was the formal basis of the Republicans, but the drift of the party to support them could not be checked. It was aided by the Supreme Court, whose influence under John Marshall as a nationalizing factor now first became apparent. The whole change reconciled the Federalists to their absorption into the Republican Party. Indeed, they claimed, with considerable show of justice, that the absorption was in the other direction: that the Republicans had recanted and that the "Washington-Monroe policy", as they termed it after 1820, was all that Federalists had ever desired." "The party appealed to businesses and to conservatives who favored banks, national over state government, manufacturing, an army and navy, and in world affairs preferred Great Britain and opposed the French Revolution. The party favored centralization, federalism, modernization, and protectionism. "The Federalists called for a strong national government that promoted economic growth and fostered friendly relationships with Great Britain in opposition to Revolutionary France. It controlled the federal government until 1801 when it was overwhelmed by the Democratic-Republican opposition led by President Thomas Jefferson. The Federalist Party came into being between 1789 and 1790 as a national coalition of bankers and businessmen in support of Hamilton's fiscal policies." Quoting Rep. John Randolph of the "Old Republicans: “Love of peace, hatred of offensive war, jealousy of the state governments toward the general government, a dread of standing armies, a loathing of public debts, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy of the patronage of the President.”
    2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. Background The Criminal Case (under Obama) . "The defendants in this case were indicted in June of 2012 on five counts related to providing financial support to al-Shabaab, a Somali militia group that was designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department on February 26, 2008. During the lower court proceedings, the defendants filed motions to suppress evidence collected pursuant to warrants and electronic surveillance orders issued under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which the court denied. The defendants also requested that their security-cleared counsel be granted access to pertinent FISA applications and related materials in order to prepare their legal and constitutional defenses. The defendants were ultimately convicted by a jury on February 22, 2013. "Following the conviction, it was revealed in June 2013 that the National Security Agency (NSA) had been collecting all domestic and international telephone metadata from major US providers for more than ten years. During congressional hearings before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence following the Snowden revelations, the Deputy Director of the FBI specifically cited the Moalin case as an example of an investigation where the NSA Metadata program had been used to identify the suspect. The defendants subsequently filed a motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 on November 14, 2013, based on the NSA revelations and the government's failure to produce evidence related to the pertinent FISA court applications and materials. In particular, Mr. Moalin argued that the FBI had only reopened his case in 2007 as a result of a tip generated by the NSA Metadata program. "The court denied the defendants' motion for a new trial. The defendants subsequently filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit, which is currently pending." (Case now decided) https://epic.org/amicus/fisa/215/moalin/
    2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. diatonicjon: It's not binary, just facts about what happened. The left consists of far-left socialists, (progressives, open communists, and fellow travelers, along with Antifa), then there are those whom are a little more moderate, who actually sympathize with the Nazis and Fascists, and still do, (the KKK, etc), and last, the Neoliberals, whom are moderate-socialist and globalist. Unions always side with the left, and they have shown themselves to be violent in their strikes. Socialists have always used violence as a means to an end, and they have since the French Revolution. Hillary and Bill wore purple for a reason, when she first appeared after losing the election. The "Purple Revolution" was all pre-planned if she lost. The right has the Neocons, (Bush, Cheney et al), whom are pretty close to the same as the Neoliberals, in their thinking, except that they're a little more conservative, but still back globalism. After that, you have the moderate conservatives, who support things such as Social Security, and helping the truly needy, such as the infirm and handicapped, but are against welfare entitlements to those that can work. Then, at the far right, there are those who are against any government program, and are for a very small and limited federal government. The right, (Republicans), though, have always been against using violent groups, especially with strikes, protests, and riots. That's why more people of religion are on the right, especially Protestants. However, socialism exists all through the left, and to a lesser amount, right of center, with the neocons (Bush Family). In Germany, when Antifa was formed in the thirties, it consisted of both Communists and National Socialists. They wanted to work together to run Germany. As Hitler came to power, he dropped some of the National Socialist's twenty-five point plan, as he used the banks, and worked with a few wealthy industrialists. Also, he went after the Communists in his purges. When WWII was over, Antifa rose again, but this time, they hated the Nazis, and especially the Italian Fascists, because they weren't socialist enough, and the Nazis had turned on them. The so-called Alt-Right, (alternative to the right), consists of Nazi and Fascist sympathizers, along with Klan members. So, there's two left-wing groups, Alt-Right vs. Antifa, at each other's throats. Hillary made the mistake of trying to associate the Alt-Right with the Republican Party, since many of us know their true history. The truth came out, even about the alt-right's leader. Worse, in Charlottesville, it was the Vice-Mayor, who is a member of the Black Panthers, (a communist front group), along with the ACLU, who set that confrontation up. Socialist ideology verses capitalist and conservative ideology is the divide, and that makes the two parties. There are moderate to the extreme on both sides. The main difference that affects me the most, is that the right isn't anywhere near as violent, and it is pro liberty and natural rights.
    2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157.  @CynicalBastard  The European elite (nobles/power elite) and the church have been wanting their old Holy Roman empire back since they started losing control of it in the 17th century with republicanism. That is why everything that concerns the EU is in Belgium, the seat of Pepin of Herstal, Charlemagne's great-grandfather. Federalism, which is what the US Govt was based upon, is the Roman form of government, and that was a plutocracy. The same goes for the City of London or old Londinium, and they financed the American Revolution. They supposedly reminded George III of that, to "the point of treason." Charlemagne was crowned "Emperor of the Romans" by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day at Rome's Old St. Peter's Basilica... [and] has been called the "Father of Europe" (Pater Europae), as he united most of Western Europe for the first time since the classical era of the Roman Empire and united parts of Europe that had never been under Frankish or Roman rule. His rule spurred the Carolingian Renaissance, a period of energetic cultural and intellectual activity within the Western Church. Emperors of the Holy Roman Empire considered themselves successors of Charlemagne, as did the French and German monarchs." The Carolingians want their rule back, just as the church and monarchial state led colonialism against the heathen New World. By authority of the monarchs, the monopoly companies took the new lands. During the talks in 1814, Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia spoke of stomping out republicanism and retaking control. France was there but only in attendance. Britain, supposedly, didn't fully side with them and protected North America with its navy. Later, during the presidency of McKinley, some in the US thought about merging the nation with Russia, creating a super-state, and Britain couldn't have that. McKinley was murdered. The Anglo-American Establishment originates afterward, and that is the progressive federalist movement. Both governments were behind the creation of the UN and EU, as well as the Atlantic Council. Colonialism and imperialism writ large.
    2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. RoboBear: There's a political party, and it's not the Democrats or Republicans, who are behind most of the unions, especially the Service Workers. That party is the CPUSA, along with the DSA. When Sweeney was the president of the AFL-CIO, after Vietnam, he was behind the push to allow card-carrying communists to become union members, and be allowed into positions at the union HQ. Sweeney was also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, which is nothing but another name for the CPUSA to hide it. Yes, the unions are a monopoly racket, based on violence, and have been since their founding. They can destroy the economy, and have within state economies. The UAW is proof of that. "The October League organized the founding congress of the Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) in 1977. During this period a few other new communist movement organizations also formed new communist parties. "Unlike the majority of New Communist Movement groups, the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement (DRUM), which evolved into the League of Revolutionary Black Workers (LRBW), was formed by factory workers rather than student activists. The AFL-CIO leadership supported the Vietnam War and sought to avoid strikes, but union workers saw through this and independently organized a series of wildcat strikes. Radical Marxist and other African-American auto workers subsequently formed DRUM. From 1968 to 1971 DRUM and the league acted as a dual union, with black leadership, within the United Auto Workers. In the late 1970s, a group labeled the May 19th Communist Organization was created, going on a bombing campaign."
    2
  1174. kevlarandchrome: I've thought about it. What many don't know, is that the union workers in the British coal industry, are responsible for the global warming con. They were on strike during the time of Margret Thatcher, and the price of oil had started to skyrocket, along with its availability. She pushed for nuclear power over it, to stop the unions, and when a crackpot scientist claimed that CO2 was what was causing the warming, she used that to her advantage, and the British Government stated financing universities to look into it. That created the monster that we have now, and it's all about funding to universities and NGOs. Once it is revealed that CO2 lags behind warming as much as 800 years, they'll all lose their funding. CO2 doesn't cause warming, but warming causes a rise in CO2. The truth is just starting to be revealed. The Communist Party, within the US, has had its fingers in union business for many years, going back to the thirties. They controlled the dock workers in California and were behind many strikes there. Will Geer, the elderly gay communist who played Grandpa Walton, along with his male communist lover, who dressed in a skirt, was arrested at one of those strikes. They were behind inciting the violence. The communists and socialists in Britain and Europe are behind their union strikes and have been since the 1800s. They shut the energy industry down, using violence, to get their way. Those same caliber of people, in Germany, were behind forming Antifa in the thirties.
    2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. In 1960, Reagan wrote to Nixon about leaving the Democratic Party. In fact, he was writing about JFK before he was elected, and stated that "under the tousled boyish haircut, is still old Karl Marx." Reagan went on to say that "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the party left me." That is when communism started to take over the Democratic Party, and now, there is nothing "democratic" about it, since they have injected socialism into the US, and have been attempting to dismantle the Constitution. The majority, though, started under Johnson, with the "great society" programs. Johnson and the leftists ran photos in the media, showing families living in decrepit shacks in Appalachia, which hardly existed at all, to pander at the heart's of the people. Most everyone was middle class, in Appalachia, and were working in union coal mines, etc. Johnson and the media lied. Did you ever wonder why Hollywood produced the Beverly Hillbillies? I am older than Styxhexenhammer666, and was at Ohio State in the late eighties. They were already injecting Marxist ideology into the sociology departments then, and when you walked outside those ivy covered walls, you had the Students for a Democratic Society, a known communist front group, trying to recruit you. That group actually disappeared for a while, but are now back in full force. The SDS was founded by Aryeh Neier, a devout communist, and a good friend of George Soros. Neier ran Soros' Open Society Institute after leaving the ACLU. Yes, you read that correctly. I thought that I was a Democrat, when I became a college freshman, but that changed quickly, once I learned of what was taking place. I have been a Republican ever since. Have a guess at who was a guest speaker at the Feminist protest in DC. It was Angela Davis, who ran in the VP spot with Guss Hall, for the Communist Party USA ticket in 1980 and 1984. The CPUSA didn't run anyone after that, but they openly supported Obama, Sanders, and Clinton. They supported every Democratic candidate from 1988 on.
    1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. Socialists and communists are all the same. In the Venezuelan's case, they waited for capitalists to build their oil infrastructure, before they stole it (nationalization), thinking that it would always support them, and would not invest in anything else, as that would be capitalism to do so. Of course, the countries who had stock in their oil industry was going to drop them over their theft. Socialists are thieves, nothing more. They can't stand the fact that capitalists, who have the money, are needed for capital, which is invested in a business venture, who hire the people, to turn a profit. Without capitalism, and money available for capital expenditures, you can not expand. Marxism, Socialism, Communism, and Progressivism have never worked, and never will. It is nothing but rebranded serfdom, where nobody (the Proletariat) can advance, because the Bourgeoisie (the middle-class capitalist small business owners), are gone, and those with the wealth run the government and industry, and they will not allow anyone they do not want to succeed, or become one of them. Take a look at what the jealous Bolsheviks did to the Russian farmers who owned property for the first time, and were turning a small profit. They claimed the farmers stole the land, so the bolsheviks stole their money, before they murdered everyone in the village. Socialists are that way, jealous of those who have more, because they're too lazy to work for it, and think that those who have money somehow owe it to them, without having to lift a finger to work for it. It can be said to be a Robin Hood syndrome.
    1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. I've heard and read a lot of crackpot theories behind communist countries failing (It's the Jews, etc), and many don't understand how many communist countries there are, but Styx is correct, in that it isn't capitalism at the root of their failure, it's their communist politics and economics. People may not know this, but it was the Communist Party USA who was behind Occupy Wall Street, and they take full credit for that sit in and rioting. They are within the Democratic Party like a bad syphilis infection. If you want a real eye-opener, look into Assad's political party in Syria, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. That party is part of a coalition of communist parties known as the National Progressive Front, which originates from the old Syrian Communist Party. Communism was banned until Assad lifted it in the 1986, and they crawled into bed with Russia. There are ten Communist Party factions within the NPF. Iraq and Iran have the same party within, as do several other states in the Middle-East. Did you ever notice how Kim started firing his missiles off after we went to Turkey, and advanced into northern Syria? It wasn't just over war games in South Korea. From what I've read, the Communists still control about 1/2 the Duma in Russia. Now, you know why Tulsi Gabbard went to Syria, and why she is now spewing vitriol about Trump. That is why Obama, Clinton, and many others in the Democratic Party, are very friendly with Syria and others in the Middle East. That is why Clinton and Podesta have big ties to Russia.
    1
  1233. Robert knew who killed his brother. After it happened, he was heard saying "they killed him," but who were they? The killers were from the Chicago mafia, the breeding grounds of communism, and they were under orders from the Democratic Party, along with several who JFK had just fired. They found out that the Kennedy's would not go along with the communists who were running things in the DNC out of Chicago and the ones in the unions, so they had him killed off, and installed their puppet, Lyndon Johnson, who they had criminal blackmail info on. Johnson brought in the first sweep of socialism, to buy the minority votes, and every Democratic president after that added their part, along with two Neocons, the Bushes. The last two Democrat presidents were groomed by the party from a young age, and were people who they could also control with blackmail. They took out Nixon by impeachment, and tried to kill Reagan, because he was set on destroying communism. They had fought back, just as Trump is now. This goes back to the 1944 election, which would have been FDR and Henry Wallace. Many think that Wallace had converted to communism, as several were known to have in the White House, such as the Treasury Sect. During the Democratic convention, they suddenly removed Wallace, and replaced him with Harry Truman for this reason. FDR didn't attend, and they said it was because of his ill health. Not long after the election, FDR died, and Truman became president. After the Venona Papers came out, they found out that the State Dept. was loaded with communists and spies, along with several in the White House under FDR. During the first term of Truman, according to FBI files, the California Communist Party took over the Progressive Party, which Wallace joined. During the 1948 election, the communists were controlling it, and Wallace ran against Truman under them, but lost. The Progressive Party disbanded, and their politicians joined the Democrats, where they slowly started to take it over. By the time that JFK was elected, they were in control of things, and several murders had taken place, which they laid to suicides. Some left the Democrats over their communist ties, and this may be one of the reasons for the Dixiecrats being formed, which they kept a lid on. There's two groups of socialists involved in the Democratic Party, yet today, and they are the Nazi sympathizers and the Communists. They are the ones who were deeply involved with the UN, and helping push for the EU. The Bush family are Neocons, and Nazi sympathizers, who helped finance Hitler, along with the Harriman family. Most of the bank executives financing the Nazis, in Harriman Brothers, were Skull & Bones members. The government seized the assets of their bank until WWII was over. It was Prescott Bush involved in it. You'll see where a few journalists and authors have tried to deny this, but a look at their backgrounds tells one that they're in on covering it up. They are biased stories. The point is, JFK and Robert's own political party had them killed.
    1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. marko a. a. khatwah; I'll guarantee you, that when Styx was in college, he learned this very thing. The myth of Satan controlling the underworld is Greco-Roman. It did not originate in Judaism, though the Essenes did start to believe in it, after the Persians controlled the Levant before the Romans, which was behind the ideology of Enoch. The Greek God, Hades, or the Greco-Roman's Pluton (Pluto), became Satan. This ideology also came from the Persians, via Zoroastrianism, after Alexander the Great conquered the Levant from the Persians. The look of Satan was derived from Pan. It is very simple to look at both the Jewish and Catholic Encyclopedias to learn of the truth, along with several books written by theological scholars on the subject. Below, I quote Dr. Elaine Pagels, PhD, from her book, “The Origin of Satan,” 1995: "In biblical sources, the Hebrew term, “the satan” [ha-satan], describes an adversarial role. It is not the name of a particular character. Although Hebrew storytellers, as early as the sixth century B.C.E., occasionally introduced a supernatural character, whom they called “the satan”; what they meant, was any one of the angels sent by God, for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity." Pagels PhD in religion (Christianity) is from Harvard, and she teaches it at Princeton. Next, I quote Rabbi Tovia Singer, on the subject of satan: "Although this well-known Christian doctrine has much in common with the pagan Zoroastrian Persian dualism from which it spawned, it is completely alien to the teachings of the Jewish Scriptures. In fact, this Christian notion that [the or a] Satan, in an act of outright defiance, ceased to function as God had intended him to, suggests that God created something imperfect or defective". Next, I quote Rabbi Dr. Raymond Apple: "The word Satan figures in the Hebrew Bible, but not as a proper name. As a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. It is sometimes used in a human sense; in Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. "It does not begin to have a superhuman sense until late in the Biblical period; in Zechariah 3 and the Book of Job it is applied to the prosecutor in the heavenly court. But even in this sense, Satan is not a demon. At best, he is one of the celestial beings, but it may be that the word is merely a colorful metaphor and does not imply that there is any actual being with that name. Nor is Satan opposed to God. At worst, he is simply a devil’s advocate drawing God’s attention to things that appear to be wrong. "Kaufmann Kohler’s theory, in his “Jewish Theology”, chapter 31, is that just as the serpent in the creation story “represents the evil inclination which arises in man with his first consciousness of freedom”, so Satan is an allegorical [fictional] figure “representing the evil of the world, both physical and moral”. "In post-Biblical Jewish sources there are very few references to Satan, and those that are found have no dogmatic or authoritative significance. Satan continues to represent the impersonal force of evil; thus, the Tosefta Shabbat advises that one should “not go on a journey with a wicked man, because Satan accompanies him”. In Jewish liturgy the few references to Satan are all impersonal, for instance the evening prayer that God may remove the adversary “from before us and behind us”, and the morning prayer for protection from “the destroying adversary”. "Popular lore has a far stronger notion of Satan deriving from the New Testament. There he not only personifies the spirit of evil but assumes an independent personality hostile to Jesus and to God. As a result, Milton, writing in an age when people regarded Satan as the presiding demon in stark opposition to God, was able, at least in the first two or three books of “Paradise Lost”, to draw a sympathetic picture of Satan and turn him into almost an epic hero. "For Judaism, all this goes much too far." Also, from Dr. Helen Bond: "There's no kind of prince of darkness; somebody who stands in opposites to God. Throughout most of the texts, there's no concept at all of an evil force" Dr. Helen Bond, MTheol PhD, Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland. Quote from "The History Of The Devil." Last, from Gerald Messandé, in his book, "A History of the Devil": “The framework of the three monotheisms [Essene Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] had been erected. The Devil’s birth certificate was filled out by an Iranian prophet.” Thus, there is no invisible devil who makes man sin (break the ancient laws), it is mans own mind, where man becomes a satan (an adversary to others).
    1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. A very good description. From my study, one of the first mentions of a culture inventing an anti-God, having an evil and good God, was the Persians. Zoroaster's original theory was that of an angry and good spirit, but it was the two sides of the same spirit. That also alludes to yin and yang, black and white, good and bad within the whole, or our spirit having a duality of the whole. Somewhere after, it was changed into an evil entity, and surprise, the Persian rulers called their enemies worshipers of this evil entity, for war, and that those who broke their moral law would be punished by this evil God. Of course, the Persians took the Levant, and this belief came there. Judaic scholars think that this was the basis for the book of Enoch (about 200 BC), and if I recall, this belief made its way into the Essene sect. The Pharisees never believed in it, but believed in an afterlife, though the Sadducee never believed in an afterlife nor resurrection. Jesus, and the apostles, came from the Pharisees, and after Jesus' death, they became known as the Nazarene sect, which later became Christians with the Romans. Christianity remained Judaic, for about another 100 years. After that was when the Romans bastardized it, and added Greco-Roman paganism and Persian Zoroastrianism. Also, Paul was an Essene, (though he claimed he wasn't), it is said, and it also may be where this also came from. Greco-Roman mythology had the God, Hades, who was later renamed, Pluton. He was the God of the underworld and wealth. This was also where the Roman Catholic purgatory developed, where Hades, now renamed Satan by the Christian Romans, would punish the wicked. The story of a fallen angel can be found here, where Zeus slayed Typhon, and cast him to Hades. The appearance of a God of the underworld can be found in ancient Mesopotamia, where they had a Goddess of the underworld, who was married to a minor God of war. However, here, nobody was punished with hell fire and eternal damnation. At most, the spirit was shunned by the others, and the sin was lying, as the Goddess kept a book of the liars. Greek mythology most likely came from Mesopotamia, though the Gods were a little different, had different names, and the tales changed. Jewish monotheists, saw that the ancients, such as from Mesopotamia and Canaan, were calling phenomenons of nature Gods, and they saw these as being part of one God, which is the entirety of nature, infinity, or the ALL. Thus, God is both evil and good, and since our soul is a part of Gods, it also has a dual nature. When we die, that part of God, our soul, goes back. One can find this within the Zohar, which explains the metaphor of the Torah. Anyhow, the Roman church played with the text of the Gospels, where they capitalized the Hebrew word, Satan, and deleted the word "the" in front of it in several places. Luke 10:18 is one place, where they claim that it means a fallen angel, but in fact, it is speaking about the people and city of Capernaum falling like lightning from Heaven. In certain scholarly circles, this church trickery is known as the big lie. Satan is a Hebrew word that means adversary, and can be used for those who block or hinder mans progress. Jesus called Peter a satan, and a stumbling block. He was most assuredly not a fallen angel, who punishes sinners with hell fire and brimstone. Here, the word was used correctly, as Peter was arguing with Jesus, and he was impeding what Jesus wanted to do.
    1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. Even though the Ayatollah is on friendly terms with Russia, they're not friendly enough for Russia to save them, unless it's over their oil and gas. Left wing politics still controls Iran somewhat within the Shia, as during Mosaddegh, the National Front had the Communist Party and strong Nazi influence within, which still exists in some parts of the Middle-East, especially Egypt. The only thing the Ayatollah despised about them was their secularism, but many radicals are not secular. The radicals in the National Front of Iran is where a lot of the terrorism originates, even though they were supposedly suppressed in 1981. Of course, when hasn't the Communists or Nazis not been genocidal maniacs? The Mullah's ties to the MB is the Nazi and Communist connection. A case in point was Yasser Arafat in Palestine, who was a KGB operative that was selected from the MB in Egypt, and was trained and given fake papers, then sent to Palestine. Arafat was a cousin of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who was a Nazi Muslim radical that worked with Hitler, and was the father of today's modern jihad. Today's Grand Mufti is supposedly a part of the same family. The same type of operatives and activists are within Iran today. When I read about how the National Front Shiites supposedly fled under the Mullahs, I have to laugh. Many of the secular merely went to ground after 1981, and the left wing religious radicals are still within their government. I believe the Ayatollah to be more of a Nazi ideologue myself. Socialism is socialism, no matter if it's National or International. Today's MB: "While the parties [MB and Iran] have had informal contacts since the founding of Iran’s Islamic Republic in 1979, the relationship entered a new phase as the Muslim Brotherhood rose to power in Egypt after the 2011 uprising. When the Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohamed Morsi, was elected Egypt’s president in 2012, official contacts between Cairo and Tehran increased. But Morsi, forced to heed the views of Egypt’s military establishment and traditional allies, proved unwilling to reestablish formal diplomatic ties, which had been severed in 1979, during his first and only year in office. Instead, the new Egyptian administration undertook a more gradual approach toward warming relations with Iran." "The shared basis in political Islam between the Brotherhood, one of the world’s largest and most influential Sunni Islamist movements, and Iran’s Shia Islamic Republic facilitated cooperation between the two sides. Ideologically, both parties advocate for the establishment of an Islamic state, religious proselytism (daawa), and Muslim unity. They also share some common geopolitical aims, including the need to confront Israel and liberate Palestine." https://carnegie-mec.org/2019/03/19/mismatched-expectations-iran-and-muslim-brotherhood-after-arab-uprisings-pub-78621
    1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. That John McCain war-loving crowd is truly tied to the old Nazi Party, as well as organized crime, and has been since the thirties. It's within both of the political parties, (neoliberals and neocons). Since FDR, the public hasn't had much of a choice in who to vote for, as the socialist power elite, (Rockefeller, etc), controlled both parties. "We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future."__HRC, July 15th, 2009, at CFR-DC, about the CFR moving into Washington DC. "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens." --Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werne “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a good idea after all.” – Strobe Talbot (Clintons’ Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time (July 20th, 1992). Talbot attended Oxford with Bill Clinton, who was there on a Rhodes Scholarship. "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."__James Paul Warburg, (Vice Chairman of the Board at Bank of the Manhattan Company), and Chairman of the Council of Foreign Relations, testimony before the U.S. Senate (Feb 17, 1950) as quoted by Family Guardian Fellowship, The Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302 (Feb 14, 2014).
    1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. I would not place much trust in any poll. The Trump and Johnson elections are proof of that. That being said, nobody asks the question: why do they want him impeached? No MSM source will expose it, and it sure isn't about his looks or actions. It was about what he intended on doing after he took office, which he put into action shortly after Sessions was accepted as the AG. Nobody, it seems, reads the DOJ's news website, but June 2017 started the ball rolling, and it made people such as Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi tremble with fear. The real news wasn't reported by any media. Ukraine investigation began. 33 indictments; Russian mafia. Oligarchs' list; accounts frozen, property seized. Bank investigations over money laundering. Huge fines. Two honeytrap blackmail rackets ended. Sinaloa cartel busted, El Chapo brought in. (Russian mob supplier). Enforcement at the border increased. Other gangs busted, as well as smaller suppliers. Crackdown on cocaine, multiple tonnages seized. Crackdown on Heroin, Fentanyl, and Scrips. Non-physicians found to have a DEA license. An investigation into nuclear material. Megatons for Megawatts. Russian reset. An investigation into why Project Cassandra was dropped. An investigation into how the oligarchs stole heavy industry in the old Soviet bloc, starting with Yukos Oil and Gazprom. Who is Mr. Mifsud from Malta? Who were the Mifsud brothers, such as Big Frank Mifsud, from 1950s-70s London? Who was Stephen Ward of London, and what happened there? What is Brighton Beach famous for? Who was its Rep in Congress? Who is the Senator? Who are the oligarchs, and how did they make their money? What is the City of London famous for? Why was Canary Wharf made into a banking district? What are the Panama and Paradise Papers? Why was attention put on Prince Andrew? Why did Qatar drop out of OPEC? Was Hezbollah running drugs? What is the Great Game? Now you know.
    1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322.  Clarence Spangle  You can see it all though their policy, what with them trying to force labor unions on the working public, and every radical social program imaginable. Trotsky's idea was international in scope, with permanent revolution to spread their disease everywhere. That's what the UN is for, and what is behind globalism. All the shipping problems, now, go back to two unions, the Teamsters, and the Longshoreman's. Who were they affiliated with in the past? Trotsky hated Stalin, who he claimed was a "nationalist," though Stalin was fully ready to spread Soviet socialism everywhere when the SU became strong enough. The CEOs and bankers that helped Stalin, though, really favored Trotsky's ideas of world domination. All the left-winger CEOs rushed to help Stalin build manufacturing plants there, which were turned over to the state after they were up and running. They did that while we were suffering through the Great Depression, which proves that it was purposely brought about, where they tried to blame it all on the Old Right, which they wanted rid of. They had to have a crisis for FDR to "fix," who was deep into the pockets of the Anglo-American elite, and their bankers. I listened to a famous UK historian state that FDR told Churchill that he was looking for a way for the US to enter the war, sometime before we did. The Yalta Conference was very telling, where FDR and Stalin made Churchill sit outside. The Roosevelts, Rockefellers and Astors were the kingpins, along with a certain banker elite, who they had just given a big lot of land to. It was a "we'll finance the government, and make you richer, if you'll scratch our backs."
    1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. Bernie an independent? LOL! Hillary knows what he is, just as many others do. Bernie is known as a "fellow traveler," and this is the reason why the DNC yanked the rug out from under him. They did it with Henry Wallace in 1944, and they did it with Bernie in 2016. If anyone remembers the Colonel Sanders cartoon of Bernie, passing out chicken wings with the hammer and sickle on them, then they'll understand what a fellow traveler is. Hell, there are fellow travelers within the globalist neo-liberal group, even though it is considered liberal capitalism, who are behind attacking the Bill of Rights now. Bernie wouldn't have drew the numbers that he did, if Hillary had an actual platform that appealed to the left. The Democrats allowed a group of radical fellow travelers to take over the Democratic Party by the early 2000s, and they're now paying for it. How they'll dislodge them is beyond me, but if they don't, they'll end the Democratic Party. They better hope that they can get something like COINTELPRO operating again, but this time, legally, since the Democrats were behind destroying it, and they better hope that they can root the radicals out. The Democrats brought this upon their own self, over buying the radicals vote. Neo-liberalism was started by a group of elite businessmen and bankers, etc, during the Nixon administration. The Trilateral Commission founders admitted that they started the commission to bring Nixon down, because he was going to go after Johnson's welfare program, and that Nixon intended on actually prosecuting the war in Vietnam. They were behind setting Nixon up with Watergate, and their congressmen were behind defunding the war. Kissinger and Brzezinski was in the White House, working behind Nixon's back. Leaks were everywhere, just like now. What's happening with Trump, happened with Nixon. Did anyone ever wonder why Nixon stated that the Bohemian Grove was "faggy"? That is where the press and the elite got together, up a Californian hollow, just off the Russian River, to set it all up. They've been behind the attempted takedown of every Republican president, since that day, who didn't kowtow to their position. The Trilateral Commission coined the term, New World Order. They control the Fed, the IMF, and the World Bank. The left and the right are involved in it. David Rockefeller, Henry, Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Jimmy Carter set it all up. That is how Carter came out of nowhere, after Ford, and received the backing that he did.
    1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. P Lewin: The big lie about "the switch" that the Democrats tell is the best one. They claim that there was a switch, during Nixon, like the Democrats and Republicans switched, because the Democrats lost the south. It was northern workers moving in droves to the south, for employment, that did it. They think that we don't know about the black communists, who took over the automotive unions in Michigan, causing strikes. The New Communist Movement, (NCM groups), formed "the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement (DRUM), which evolved into the League of Revolutionary Black Workers (LRBW), was formed by factory workers rather than student activists. The AFL-CIO leadership supported the Vietnam War and sought to avoid strikes, but union workers saw through this and independently organized a series of wildcat strikes. Radical Marxist and other African-American auto workers subsequently formed DRUM. From 1968 to 1971 DRUM and the league acted as a dual union, with black leadership, within the United Auto Workers. In the late 1970s a group labeled the May 19th Communist Organization was created, going on a bombing campaign." They think that we forget about the blacks flooding north, to obtain employment in Michigan and Illinois, along with a multitude of other large manufacturing states. They leave this history out of their tales about the big lie: "the switch." Michael Moore wonders what happened to Flint Michigan? This is what happened. The blacks sold themselves to the communist movement, with Johnson's promise of welfare.
    1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. In Patton's case, he must have not understood (or wasn't in the loop) that you do not go on to destroy a nation, such as Russia, which just had its heavy industry built by the Western power elite, during the Great Depression. Henry Ford, and the people at Occidental Petroleum would have raised hell over it. Hidden History 101. Paraphrasing an ex-Soviet during an interview: "The Soviet Union wasn't communism, it was state capitalism." Funny, don't you think, that after Nixon, China turned out the same? China practices the most extreme form of state capitalism. Q: Was the profits in the USSR and China ever fairly distributed to the people? "State capitalism is an economic system in which the state undertakes commercial (i.e. for-profit) economic activity and where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor and centralized management), or where there is otherwise a dominance of corporatized government agencies (agencies organized along business-management practices) or of publicly listed corporations in which the state has controlling shares. Marxist literature defines state capitalism as a social system combining capitalism with ownership or control by a state—by this definition, a state capitalist country is one where the government controls the economy and essentially acts like a single huge corporation, extracting the surplus value from the workforce in order to invest it in further production. This designation applies regardless of the political aims of the state (even if the state is nominally socialist). Many scholars argue that the Soviet Union and the countries modeled after it, including Maoist China, were state capitalist systems. Many scholars also argue that the current People's Republic of China constitutes a form of state capitalism."__Wikipedia on State Capitalism.
    1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. This is why I do not follow any religion but my own. I believe in God, and that is it. Religion, both monotheism, and polytheism have always been a part of the ancient three estates where man was deified as a god on earth. Religion installed the monarch, whereby by the church/high priest selected the ruler from the noble class (the landed wealthy power elite). Religion was formed as a pyramid scam used to control the masses for the ruling elite that they installed. Worse, religion is the root of money and usury. Religion has its good points, as far as teaching virtue, but it has many bad points and vices. Protestantism tried to counteract this, but the churches with hierarchies are all corrupt. Ray Stevens had a song that described it to a tee: "Would Jesus Wear A Rolex." Both Christianity and Islam have their roots in Judaism, and if the public knew the truth about the roots of Judaism, they would riot. Ask yourself, was there any archeological proof that King Soloman and David existed, or that more than one temple existed? This has been debated in scholarly circles for many years. What does Soloman really define? Sol = Sun or Son. Soloman = Son of Man. The monarch is called Sol. The ancient astral triad of the moon god and goddess mating to produce the sun god. The hidden secret is that religion is based upon the procreation of man, where the woman/goddess is venerated. Here, the royal bloodline is selected by the church from the wealthy Baal (landlords). This is what the Protestant movement tried to overturn, but it failed. This ancient scam is still in play, spreading its seeds of hate and malcontent, all for political power and wealth.
    1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. The Patriot Act was a direct result of the Church Committee, believe it or not, and not 9/11. What happened, was that a radical left-wing group broke into a building, and stole documents exposing COINTELPRO. That program started in 1956, and it's first purpose was to infiltrate and subvert factions and activist groups in the US, with the first being the Communists. The problem, was that the program was illegal, and the majority of their investigations were done without warrants. It continued, and was used against the black uprising and MLK, etc, during the sixties and seventies. After it was exposed, and the Church Committee condemned it, and there were three executive orders written, banning what it did. What happened next, was that the government used 9/11 as an excuse to legalize much of what they had done under COINTELPRO. Now, we have ANTIFA and BLM, on top of Muslim insurgents, and the government will not let that go to waste. You'll see more of what was within COINTELPRO legalized. They've already relaxed the no-assassination order, to allow the killing of terrorists. What will happen if the president lifts section 2.11 of EO 12333 entirely? The president can do that with a stroke of a pen. You might start seeing the leaders of ANTIFA suddenly disappear, or their bodies are found with a suicide note. The government has done it before, and they'll do it again. They already have a law on the books, which covers the members of ANTIFA, and that is the Communist Control Act of 1954, on top of the Patriot Act, but they'll eventually chip away at EO 12333, until they have COINTELPRO completely legalized. Guilfoyle's words are the beginning of it.
    1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. The corporations think that they are going to narrow the way copyright and fair use works, which is an attack on the freedom of speech, thinking that nobody will challenge them. In my opinion, I believe that the teeth of copyright law should be lessened from what it is, especially about how long one can claim a copyright. It should be brought in line with the time limits on patents. However, a Copyright does not grant one proprietary rights as does a patent. "In United States copyright law, transformation is a possible justification that use of a copyrighted work may qualify as fair use, i.e., that a certain use of a work does not infringe its holder's copyright due to the public interest in the usage. Transformation is an important issue in deciding whether a use meets the first factor of the fair-use test, and is generally critical for determining whether a use is in fact fair, although no one factor is dispositive. " In Folsom v. Marsh. In that case, Justice Story ruled that : "if [someone] thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticize, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy." In other words, the article shown or quoted must be transformed into something else, or be critiqued. Also, "the idea–expression divide or idea–expression dichotomy limits the scope of copyright protection by differentiating an idea from the expression or manifestation of that idea." "In the United States the 1879 opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Baker v. Selden[4] elaborated this doctrine, holding that, while exclusive rights to the "useful arts" (in this case bookkeeping) described in a book might be available by patent, only the description itself was protectable by copyright. In Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539, 556 (1985), the Supreme Court stated that "copyright's idea/expression dichotomy 'strike[s] a definitional balance between the First Amendment and the Copyright Act by permitting free communication of facts while still protecting an author's expression.'" (internal citation omitted). Additionally, in Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 201, 217 (1954), the Supreme Court stated "Unlike a patent, a copyright gives no exclusive right to the art disclosed; protection is given only to the expression of the idea—not the idea itself."" "In the Australian decision of Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co. Ltd v. Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479 at 498, Latham CJ used the analogy of reporting a person's fall from a bus: the first person to do so could not use the law of copyright to stop other people from announcing this fact." Quoted from Wikipedia. https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/
    1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. When the federal government came into being, (the centralized government of the US), the founding fathers never intended it to become what it has. If they had, there would not be the three branches of government, only one, and there would be no state and county governments. It would have been one large centralized government if they had intended on it being the tyrannical dictatorship that the socialist left wishes for. In fact, the founders cut the nation up into counties and states and divided up the central government to stop either branch from having more power than the other. The central government was created only for two things, the defense of the nation and a judiciary. Now, go back and look at the history of each administration. Over time, you will notice that it has been under presidents with a socialist slant, where more power has been given to the executive branch, regardless of political party. The worst of it started with the murder of William McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt replacing him. Who were the Roosevelts? Avid socialists going back to at least Clinton Roosevelt who supported Karl Marx. Teddy brought in progressivism, which is hidden socialism, then he formed the Bull Moose Party to keep the old conservative GOP from retaking control until Wilson did what he was selected to do. It has been a downhill socialist slide since then, controlled by the socialistic power elite, in both political parties, leading to a big brother central government with the executive branch having too much power. The states were hoodwinked out of their power, by the change in the Senate, and Congress, along with the judiciary, gave in over bribery, blackmail, and socialist slanted judges being selected. This is what has led us to today. Socialism has always been a scourge led by the power elite because they do not want to abide by any law while enforcing the law upon those in the lower classes. At the roots of socialism is an old Gnostic cult, that stated that they did not have to abide by the "Jewish law," and that they intended on taking the world back to the time of Eden when there was no law. It was a cult based upon sexual perversion and lawlessness called the Carpocratians of Alexandria, Egypt. It reared its ugly head up, again, during the early 1400s, in Bohemia, known as the radical Hussites, (Adamites, etc), at the start of the Reformation. That scourge spread worldwide, with the Unitarians, and today, it is known as socialism.
    1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. Of course they're not going to tell the truth, when they have been directed by a group of corrupt politicians, foreign nations, and a supra-national organization, since 2013. These are the very people that fully intended on handing over US sovereignty to the "liberal international order," based upon a new model, and worse, the US was to be at the head of it, if this corrupt cabal kept control. That is why they bet their lives on China. This has been long coming, starting with Eisenhower's international policy, which was kept classified for many years. However, it was Nixon that began to completely change it, and bring in China. From Nixon to Obama, they were all involved in it. Everybody blames Clinton for climate change. It was Nixon, who was behind the environmentalists, when he agreed to create Earth Day. Then came the propaganda about "smog in LA," and the Indian on TV. Worse, it was GHW Bush who signed the US up for climate change, and the UN agendas, at Rio, in 1992. That was the start of the Rio+20, and the UN agendas on sustainability. Bush, again, told them that the US would lead it. The Clinton administration, took it, and run with it. GHW Bush's NWO, which a handful of other presidents spoke of, is the G20, but mainly, the G7, which was started under Nixon as the Library Group, or the Group of Four. Britain, France, and Germany, all involved with the US, to create it at the White House. These are the very nations involved in the election interference, and spying on US citizens, today. They also perverted US intel under Nixon. Hello Mr. Kissinger. He knows what you've done.
    1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. After reviewing Vail's book, he speaks of the same myth about Templars in Scotland. In actuality, the two Rites start with a side-degree that started in London, around 1730, called the Scots Master degree, or the fourth degree. That spread to France. It was renamed the Royal Arch degree as England and Scotland were at war, again. The French added the other twenty-one degrees, making up twenty-five. That came to the US, and the Rite was taken over by Freemasons in South Carolina by 1800. There, the other eight degrees were added, and the others edited. In France, the esoteric knowledge of the two Rites was added, and it came from the Teutonic Knights in Germany, not the Templars, though they probably knew of it. The Masonic Authentic School, known as the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, has the correct history of Freemasonry and they have debunked many of these old authors, including Albert Pike, who believed the French account. A French Freemason, by the name of Andrew Michael Ramsay, spun a huge tale about the Templars, in order to coax the French nobility into joining this new order. In reality, the esoteric teaching came from Germany and the Teutonic Knights. Eastern Europe was a hotbed for Gnosticism and Mysticism, and Bohemia was a hub for it. Roman masonry and design came to Scotland by the late 10th century, before the Templars were founded. Later, some Templars fled to Scotland after the order was disbanded in 1312, but that was under Robert Bruce, who reigned from 1306 - 1329, and thirty-plus years before the life of Henry Sinclair (St. Claire), 1345  –  1400, and his myth. Roman Masonry, in Britain, is almost four hundred years older than this, thus, the Templar founding myth is hogwash. Templars bult nothing; they had several of the twenty-five colleges or guilds to do it. The craft and operative Masonry spread from the Scottish Lodges to Guilds in England and Wales. It is thought to have come to Scotland via traveling Freemasons (Masons allowed to travel freely by a pass from the pope or king) from Lombardy around Lake Como. That is where Constantine's twenty-five colleges or guilds settled as a headquarters while building the cathedrals and government buildings. That Roman knowledge was spread by the builders, which came to Scotland by around 950 CE at the earliest. As a lesson, don't believe everything you read, especially about this knowledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=Jt5xHnMUCtcC&pg=PA108&lpg=PA108&dq=Scots+Master+degree&source=bl&ots=khKc_1LWgg&sig=ACfU3U3Ki8JXZ49aVSQp7kziI6t-hVaapw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjertjAqfnlAhX5KDQIHdOXA1IQ6AEwEXoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=Scots%20Master%20degree&f=false
    1
  1550. From the Templar Code for Dummies, page 197: "France was a very sympathetic Catholic country, and there was a certain adolescent glee over playing host to the enemies of England. Annoying the English was a longstanding French pastime. The supporters of James became known as Jacobites, and there was a sizeable number of them. It is believed that modern Freemasonry came to France from Scotland with the Jacobites, and that it was these disaffected Scots and English who began to develop many of the appendant degrees. In spite of its name, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry actually began in France. "Chevalier Ramsay briefly was employed as a tutor to the exiled King James II’s two sons, and his many travels were turned into popular books. But he is most important to Freemasons for one document, known as Ramsay’s Oration. Whether Ramsay actually gave it as a speech in public is unknown, but his 1737 paper told a story about how Freemasonry began in the Holy Land and how its secrets were actually brought back to Europe by the crusading knights. He never said that the knights were the Templars — in fact, he actually credited the Knights of St. John. And he never suggested creating new degrees or introducing chivalric orders into the fraternity, but it didn’t matter. Creative Freemasons, mostly in France, took Ramsay’s ideas and ran with them. You can see the scale to which the new degrees can be attributed to these expatriate Scots in the term the French used to describe them — they were called the Ecossais degrees, French for 'Scottish.'” [sic] ==== "Our ancestors, the Crusaders, gathered together from all parts of Christendom in the Holy Land, desired thus to reunite into one sole Fraternity the individuals of all nations."__Ramsay's Oration. The Teutonic Knights were called The Order of Brothers of the German House of Saint Mary in Jerusalem. The Templars were called the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon. The Hospitallers were called the Order of Knights of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem. They all intermixed and were all associated with the Crusades. However, the Templars' organization was absorbed by the Hospitallers or the Order of St. John at the end. After the fall, they were the same thing, though a group of the Templars was protected in Portugal, which survived as the Military Order of Christ and the Supreme Order of Christ, today. However, the Gnostic esoteric knowledge was prevalent in Eastern Europe and the German Lodges promoted what came to France.
    1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566.  @nunereclipsereborn  What we're seeing, right now, is state capitalism spreading everywhere. It is what was with fascist Italy and Germany, and in many other nations with nationalized corporations, or partial ownership of corporations. As a matter of fact, since 1900, the UK was one of the top nations with nationalized corporations. Under TARP, the US Government sees itself as a partial owner under the bailout. Read these four articles, though they are by Wikipedia: Nationalization List of nationalizations by country State capitalism State ownership For the US: 2009: Some economists consider the government's actions through the Troubled Asset Relief Program and the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act with regards to Citigroup to have been a partial nationalization.[84] Proposal was made that banks like Citigroup be brought under a conservatorship model similar to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that some of their "good assets" be dropped into newly created "good bank" subsidiaries (presumably under new management), and the remaining "bad assets" be left to be managed under the supervision of a conservatorship structure.[83] The government's actions with regard to General Motors in replacing the CEO with a government-approved CEO is likewise being considered as nationalization.[85][86] On June 1, 2009, General Motors filed for bankruptcy during the automotive industry crisis, with the government investing up to $50 billion in debtor-in-possession financing and taking 60% ownership in the company. In addition to a U.S. Government ownership, the Governments of Canada and Ontario also took ownership of 7.9% and 3.8% of General Motors, respectively.[87] President Barack Obama stated that the nationalization was temporary, saying, "We are acting as reluctant shareholders because that is the only way to help GM succeed." Citigroup is one of the leaders of the reset.
    1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. penguins inadiorama: Well, it most assuredly did with the UK and France, as they were who cut up the Middle-East into nation states after WWI. The British had started the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909, renamed the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in the thirties, which later became BP. The British and French made the states with agreements including the Russians. The Russians, though, were behind installing Mosaddegh in Iran, who nationalized AIOC, making the National Iranian Oil Company. They kicked the British out. The British went to Eisenhower, in the early fifties, and said that the US was welcome to join them in the oil, if the US would help to depose Mosaddegh. That was when Ike agreed, setting the US policy for the Middle-East, and sent in the CIA to pull off the coup, which started the first US backed proxy war. That US policy has been followed until now. It's all about who controls the energy resources, Europe, along with the US, or Asia (mainly Russia). Before that, US intel helped by giving info to its allies. After, we started backing, giving training, money, and arms to militants. The big lie, was that it was about spreading democracy, and human rights. In reality, it was about Europe using the US as their bully, via NATO, to take the gas and oil. By inviting in the US oil interests, the US would protect its assets too. However, in the Saudi's case, they wanted to keep out the Russian and Iranian influence, and it does have to do with the difference between the Sunni and Shiite. Pakistan was the same, which led to Afghanistan, during the last of Carter's term. Reagan inherited that, and it was expanded. Before that, we pitted Saddam against the Ayatollah, (Iraq Iran War), after the Shah fled. During WWII, Patton and Ike was questioning why the Brits wanted to keep the US in Africa and the Middle-East. It was all about the oil and gas. That, and they couldn't allow Germany to have it. If not for that, D-Day would have occurred much earlier. Now, it's about not allowing the Asians to have it. Anyhow, since then, the US and Europe has been using the Middle-East's own people to fight wars against people backed mainly by Russia. Thus, the people are the proxies in the wars. We trained and armed them, even though US citizens would consider them militant terrorists. Russia took over the militant socialists who the Nazis were training, and arming. It's been war ever since.
    1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. The EU is nothing but the successful creation of the Nazi's Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe), which had its roots in Kalergi's Pan-Europa and the Martinist Synarchy Movement, which is tied to the Jesuit Order and the Zionist/Donmeh. The elite clique of financiers, industrialists, and oilmen from the City of London and NYC, and within the CFR, the RIIA, the League of Nations, and the UN have been behind it all, since the start of the twentieth century (1901). The same elite clique within the US and Britain financed the Nazi's rise to power, and it was ex-Nazis who penned the trade treaties leading to the EU. Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law's book, "My Exploited Father in Law": “For a long time, I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the Council on Foreign Relations - One World Money group… Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support. The UN is but a long range, international banking apparatus neatly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One World Revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. The depression was caused by "the planned sudden curtailment of call money in Wall Street in the Fall of 1929, described for the uninformed public as "The Panic!"… Obviously, the real objectives of One-World Government leaders and their ever-close bankers, are most devious. They have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the United States of America, via the creation and establishment of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank." Woodrow Wilson: “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it”. – Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913) "A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.” – Chapter 8 – Monopoly, or Opportunity? Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913) “We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world; no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”_chapter 9 – Benevolence, or Justice? Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913) The Federal Reserve was created on December 23, 1913, after earlier legislation failed. Founded by the same people. The Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) was created in 1920. Founded by the same people. The League of Nations was created on January 10th, 1920. Founded by the same people. The Council on Foreign Relations, the RIIA's sister, was created in 1921. Founded by the same people. The UN was established in 1945, but it was founded by the same people, and settled upon by FDR, Churchill, and Stalin in Tehran and Yalta. John F. Hylan: "The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states, and nation. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller–Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. "They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. "These international bankers and Rockefeller–Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection."__John F. Hylan, 1922 speech, former Mayor of New York City (1918-1925) Winston Churchill: "Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."__Winston Churchill, Zionism versus Bolshevism (1920). [Churchill distinguished between the good Jews, the ‘National Jews’ like those of Britain who were perfectly assimilated, or the Zionist Jews prepared to re-people their ‘home’ in Palestine, and the evil ‘International Jews’ (Winstonchurchill.org)]. When Churchill speaks of Jews, he isn't speaking of everyday Orthodox Judaism, but the European Jewish Conversos (Donmeh and Frankists), who would claim to convert to any religion, or become secular/atheist, in order to advance, and were in the banking industry, known as "Court Jews," along with being within the Jesuit Order since its founding. The Black Nobility and Venetian Banking. This is why the BIS and IOR are intimately entwined. Churchill leaves out their non-Zionist European counterparts, purposely, because it leads to the City of London, NYC, and Vatican City.
    1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607.  @2024magaman  There were more groups than that. The Whigs were from several groups, and some of the old Federalists were one of them. "During the 1790s, the first major U.S. parties arose in the form of the Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. After 1815, the Democratic-Republicans emerged as the sole major party at the national level but became increasingly polarized [during Madison's last two years]. A >nationalist< wing, led by Henry Clay, favored policies such as the Second Bank of the United States and the implementation of a protective tariff. A second group, the Old Republicans [Jeffersonians], opposed these policies, instead favoring a strict interpretation of the Constitution and a weak federal government." "The Whigs emerged in the 1830s [again, led by Henry Clay and Daniel Webster] in opposition to President Andrew Jackson, pulling together former members of the National Republican Party, the Anti-Masonic Party, and disaffected Democrats. The Whigs had some weak links to the defunct Federalist Party, but the Whig Party was not a direct successor to that party." Yet, they had the old Federalist's ideas. The "Whigs suffered a decisive defeat in the 1852 presidential election partly due to sectional divisions within the party. The Whigs collapsed following the passage of the Kansas–Nebraska Act in 1854, with most Northern Whigs eventually joining the Republican Party and most Southern Whigs joining the American Party and later the Constitutional Union Party. " All of this was stirred up under Madison after 1815, and after he "out-Hamiltons Alexander Hamilton" according to Rep. John Randolph of Virginia during that time. Guess why there's a huge concrete owl in a forest in California just outside San Francisco, where the GOP meets? The owl was the symbol of the Whig Party.
    1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. The truth about the creator God, ( The ALL, or Ein Soph), which is hidden in scripture by metaphor and allegory, is that the creator is the energy that the universe originates from, and is a part of. Some will argue that the universe isn't a part of it, but the very early religions thought it was, and that the gods and goddesses were created in the heavens (heavenly waters) before the planets, etc, from the universe. It's where one became two, a male and female, able to create. "Ein Sof, or Eyn Sof, (meaning "infinite", literally "without end"), in Kabbalah, is understood as God prior to any self-manifestation in the production of any spiritual realm, probably derived from Solomon ibn Gabirol's (c. 1021 – c. 1070) term, "the Endless One" (she-en lo tiklah). Ein Sof may be translated as "unending", "(there is) no end", or infinity. It was first used by Azriel (c. 1160 – c. 1238), who, sharing the Neoplatonic belief that God can have no desire, thought, word, or action, emphasized by it the negation of any attribute. Of the Ein Sof, nothing ("Ein") can be grasped ("Sof"-limitation). It is the origin of the Ohr Ein Sof, the "Infinite Light" of paradoxical divine self-knowledge, nullified within the Ein Sof prior to creation." Early kings were seen as demigods, and some were claimed to be the offspring of the gods and goddesses, which is where the divine right of kings originates. In Genesis, though apologists do their utmost to deny this, the word Elohim is plural, and can be clearly seen in the text. The Elohim were not the "creator" of the all, but born from it. Genesis 1:26: Then Elohim said, “Let us make humans in our image, in our likeness. Let them rule the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, the domestic animals all over the earth, and all the animals that crawl on the earth.” Note: "Let us," and "in our likeness." That is the polytheistic roots of all religion, which the apologists wish to distance themselves from. However, the Elohim are not the ALL or Ein Soph. It is known that from Mesopotamian texts, that Abraham was supposedly directed by the god Enlil to make his way to Palestine after Ur was destroyed by plague and war.
    1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. You have to remember the ideology and theology behind the fathers of the radical left, which were the Mystic's and Gnostic's Quietism and Perfectionism. Perfectionism as in "a doctrine holding that religious, moral, social, or political perfection is attainable, especially the theory that human moral or spiritual perfection should be or has been attained." They actually believed that they were perfect, and therefore could ignore any virtue or law, and feed their hedonism (the pursuit of pleasure and sensual self-indulgence.). "The Cathars' denial of the need for sacerdotal rites has been perceived as a form of quietism. Likewise, the twelfth and thirteenth-century Brethren of the Free Spirit, Beguines, and Beghards were all accused of holding beliefs with similarities to those condemned in the Quietist controversy. Among the ideas seen as errors (heretic), and condemned by the Council of Vienne (1311–12), are the propositions that humankind, in the present life, can attain such a degree of perfection as to become utterly sinless; that the "perfect" have no need to fast or pray, but may freely grant the body whatsoever it craves. This may be a tacit reference to the Cathars or Albigenses of southern France and Catalonia, and that they are not subject to any human authority or bound by the precepts of the church," or state. This is the root of Utopianism, and atheism, which originates in the east. It's why you always see the Silicon Valley techies running to their gurus, and why they hold those huge polyamorous sex parties like Bacchanalia. This perfectionist belief led to the Diggers in Britain, and those like Babeuf and Robespierre in France. These idiots live in a utopian dream world, and since the time of Babeuf, (who was jealous and corrupt), they believe that they can force their ideology on society as a whole, and use force (see the French Revolution, and the Second International's dogma). The Fabians are no better, as they intended on slipping socialism in, slowly, and hoping that nobody would notice.
    1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. Truth and fact: "Robert Alphonso Taft Sr. (September 8, 1889 – July 31, 1953) was an American conservative politician, lawyer, and scion of the Republican Party's Taft family. Taft represented Ohio in the United States Senate, briefly served as Senate Majority Leader, and was a leader of the conservative coalition of Republicans and conservative Democrats who prevented expansion of the New Deal. Often referred to as "Mr. Republican", he cosponsored the Taft–Hartley Act of 1947, which banned closed shops and other labor practices. "The elder son of William Howard Taft, the 27th President of the United States and the tenth Chief Justice of the United States, Robert Taft was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He pursued a legal career in Cincinnati after graduating from Harvard Law School in 1913. Along with his brother Charles Phelps Taft II, he co-founded the law partnership of Taft Stettinius & Hollister. Taft served in the Ohio House of Representatives from 1921 to 1931 and in the Ohio Senate from 1931 to 1933. Though he lost re-election in 1932, he remained a powerful force in state and local politics. "After winning election to the Senate in 1938 over incumbent Democrat Robert J. Bulkley, Taft repeatedly sought the Republican presidential nomination, often battling for control of the party with the moderate faction of Republicans led by Thomas E. Dewey. He also emerged as a prominent non-interventionist and opposed U.S. involvement into World War II prior to the 1941 Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor. Taft's non-interventionist stances damaged his 1940 candidacy, and the 1940 Republican National Convention nominated Wendell Willkie. Taft sought the presidency again in 1948, but he lost to Dewey at the 1948 Republican National Convention. He opposed the creation of NATO and criticized President Harry Truman's handling of the Korean War. "Taft again sought the presidential nomination a third time in 1952, and was widely viewed as the front-runner. However, Dewey and other moderates convinced General Dwight D. Eisenhower to enter the race, and Eisenhower narrowly prevailed at the 1952 Republican National Convention and went on to win the 1952 presidential election. Taft was elected Senate Majority Leader in 1953 but died of pancreatic cancer later that year. A 1957 Senate committee named Taft as one of America's five greatest senators, along with Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, and Robert M. La Follette Sr." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Taft This was when the GOP was overtaken by the progressive neocons led by Dewey. This was also how it used to be, before they did so. Anti-entanglement, and anti-interventionist.
    1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686.  @nothankyou9906  Three things triggered WWI, Germany's expansionism, the Scramble for Africa, and Germany looking to get into the oil business in what became Iraq, and the oil in Baku. You are correct. The US and UK were converting their navies from coal to oil, and Germany wanted to do that as well. Thus, they began building the Baghdad Railway through the Ottoman Empire, which would also bypass the Suez Canal, giving them another trade route. That was one of the reasons why the Ottomans sided with Germany, and it led to their demise. The US and UK were trying to keep both Germany and Russia from expanding into the Middle-East over oil in both wars. It's why the African Campaign was important during WWII as well. This was what they called the "Great Game." The reasons told to most of the public only have a small modicum of truth to it. The League of Nations and the UN were created over one reason, to stop war over trade and the exploitation of natural resources by the western allies. They hoped that treaties would nip wars in the bud, but in reality, both supranational organizations were started by the US and UK over their "national interests." That is the Anglo-American Establishment, or "deep state." All the wars after WWII were about keeping Soviet and Russian influence north of a certain border, and away from the oil and gas business. In reality, then, it was about stopping Soviet expansionism, but they never mention the underlying reason. The Baath Party was aligned with the Communists and Soviets, and that led to Saddam's removal. It's why Assad was targeted as well, and Iran the same. Iran was where BP was born, when it was the Persian Empire.
    1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. Marin County, whose district in the House and Senate? Jared William Huffman, on the "environmental committee." Opposed legislation: Preventing Government Waste and Protecting Coal Mining Jobs in America – is a bill that would "amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to require state programs for regulation of surface coal mining to incorporate the necessary rule concerning excess spoil, coal mine waste, and buffers for perennial and intermittent streams published by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 12, 2008."[23] Huffman opposed the bill, arguing that it should be opposed because the supporters "believe coal companies should be allowed to blow the tops off mountains and dump the waste into streams, no matter what the science says about the consequence for our environment and the public health."[24] Water Rights Protection Act – a bill that would prevent federal agencies from requiring certain entities to relinquish their water rights to the United States in order to use public lands.[25] The bill was a reaction to the United States Forest Service's decision to pursue a "new regulation to demand that water rights be transferred to the federal government as a condition for obtaining permits needed to operate 121 ski resorts that cross over federal lands."[26] Huffman opposed the bill and accused the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power of being unnecessarily "adversarial" and having "unfairly vilified" the Forest Service after a committee hearing about the bill.[26] Committee assignments: Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Select Committee on the Climate Crisis Caucus memberships[edit] Congressional Progressive Caucus[27] Congressional Arts Caucus[28] Congressional Freethought Caucus
    1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. You will find that the idea of socialism and communism is ancient, and can be traced back to the 2nd century CE Gnostics in Alexandria, Egypt and the Levant. The Borborites, Sodomites, Ophites,, Sethianism, Valentinianism, etc, known as "libertine Christian Gnostic sects," had a communal and Edenist ideology because they were immoral and perverted scofflaws/criminals, and did not want to obey what they called the "Jewish law." As a matter of fact, these Edenists wanted to take the world back to the time of Eden, where they claimed that there was no law. It is tied to the Cult of Isis and the Imperial Cult of Rome, as well as the Greek Rite of Passage (pederasty and the hare) and the Pythagorean Cult. https://www.mega.nu/ampp/eden/occult.html After the formation of the Roman church as the state religion, there were crusades against the heretics, where the Gnostic groups would flee or go underground. The ideology made its way to Greece and Rome, and through Eastern Europe. It finally rose again in the 1400s to stay, in Bohemia, as the Adamites, Orebites, and Taborites (radical Hussites), which is the start of socialism and unorthodox religion becoming mainstream. In Poland, it became Socinianism, the start of socialism under the "Unitarians." Unorthodox sects of both Christianity and Judaism spread socialism worldwide, especially the Moravian Church and the Methodist, as well as the Sabbatean/Frankists. This ideology was spread to North America, by the unorthodox churches, before the US was formed. If you study what the Borborites believed, you will find it being practiced today by some in California and New York. They call it "art." Who do you think is behind Antifa? What goes on in the underground gay/S&M community? Also, see the OTO and Equinox.
    1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. That's not quite right. There were several sects of Jews, and the Pharisees sect, which Jesus of the Nazarene was of, did not believe in a fallen angel, and still do not to this day. The word, satan, means adversary, or one who blocks man's progress, a stumbling block. Thus, in Job, satan was not the angel's name, but was what he did, acting as an adversary to Job. The angel's name is unknown. One needs to read the Jewish Encyclopedia article about Satan, to understand this. The fallen angel myth originated in Persia, with the Zoroastrian story, it is thought. Zoroaster, though, was not philosophizing about two Gods fighting, but the left and right or bad and good of the soul or consciousness. The ability of man to do both good and evil, using his mind. Later, this was changed into two Gods, in a never ending battle, and the Persians labeled their enemies as either worshiping or being possessed by this anti-God. This was brought into the Levant, when they captured the land, and was the basis of the first version of Enoch, which mainstream Judaism, and the RCC, states is a myth, and is apocryphal. The Essene sect of Judaism did start to believe in this myth. Thus, Paul believed in it, along with the Greco-Roman myth of Hades being the God of the underworld, along with the story about Zeus slaying Typhon, and casting him to Hades. This became the Christian Satan. Somewhere along the way, scribes capitalized the word, satan, and removed the word "the," from the front of it, as the Tanakh generally has it as "ha-satan" or "the satan," for the adversary. Mainstream Judaism, that of the Pharisees, believes that man is the satan, as man is born a with a mind that is a clean slate, and has free will. The soul carries on the duality of nature, in that man is both good and bad, as is God (Isaiah 45:7). Mans soul is a part of God (the All), as it lives in or strives with man (Genesis 6:3). The Garden of Eden story, is a retold and modified story from ancient Mesopotamia. The snake in the tree is a metaphor, as the snake symbol has always signified knowledge, thus the tree is the tree of knowledge. Man, after partaking from the tree, instead of the tree of life (ignorant about death), found the awful truth (knowledge) that he would die one day. That separates man from beast. The word, lucifer, was never satan. It's usage in both Jesus and the King of Babylon, was to show that both rose in renown quickly, and died at an early age, as Venus appears just before sunrise, and fades away with the sun (rising and falling quickly). Jewish Encyclopedia, for Isaiah 14:12 and the Latin word, lucifer (Hebrew: Helel ben Shahar).: "Septuagint translation of "Helel [read "Helal"] ben Shahar" (= "the brilliant one," "son of the morning"), name of the day, or morning, star, to whose mythical fate that of the King of Babylon is compared in the prophetic vision (Isaiah 14:12-14 ). It is obvious that the prophet in attributing to the Babylonian king boastful pride, followed by a fall, borrowed the idea from a popular legend connected with the morning star and Gunkel ("Schö pfung und Chaos," pp. 132-134) is undoubtedly correct when he holds that it represents a Babylonian or Hebrew star-myth similar to the Greek legend of Phaethon. The brilliancy of the morning star, which eclipses all other stars, but is not seen during the night, may easily have given rise to a myth such as was told of Ethana and Zu: he was led by his pride to strive for the highest seat among the star-gods on the northern mountain of the gods (comp. Ezekiel 28:14 Psalm 48:3 [A.V:2]), but was hurled down by the supreme ruler of the Babylonian Olympus. Stars were regarded throughout antiquity as living celestial beings ( Job 38:7 )". [sic] Also, Lucifer, at the Catholic Encyclopedia: (Hebrew helel; Septuagint heosphoros, Vulgate lucifer) The name Lucifer originally denotes the planet Venus, emphasizing its brilliance. The Vulgate employs the word also for “the light of the morning” (Job 11:17), “the signs of the zodiac” (Job 38:32), and “the aurora” (Psalm 109:3). Metaphorically, the word is applied to the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:12) as preeminent among the princes of his time; to the high priest Simon son of Onias (Ecclesiasticus 50:6), for his surpassing virtue, to the glory of heaven (Apocalypse (Revelation) 2:28), by reason of its excellency; finally to Jesus Christ himself (2 Peter 1:19; Apocalypse (Revelation) 22:16; the “Exultet” of Holy Saturday) the true light of our spiritual life." [sic] I quote Elaine Pagels, PhD, from her book, “The Origin of Satan,” 1995: In biblical sources, the Hebrew term, “the satan” [ha-satan], describes an adversarial role. It is not the name of a particular character. Although Hebrew storytellers, as early as the sixth century B.C.E., occasionally introduced a supernatural character, whom they called “the satan”; what they meant, was any one of the angels sent by God, for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity. Pagels PhD in religion is from Harvard, and she teaches it at Princeton. I quote Rabbi Tovia Singer, on the subject of satan: "Although this well-known Christian doctrine has much in common with the pagan Zoroastrian Persian dualism from which it spawned, it is completely alien to the teachings of the Jewish Scriptures. In fact, this Christian notion that [the] Satan, in an act of outright defiance, ceased to function as God had intended him to, suggests that God created something imperfect or defective". Next, I quote Rabbi Dr. Raymond Apple: "The word Satan figures in the Hebrew Bible, but not as a proper name. As a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. It is sometimes used in a human sense; in Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. "It does not begin to have a superhuman sense until late in the Biblical period; in Zechariah 3 and the Book of Job it is applied to the prosecutor in the heavenly court. But even in this sense, Satan is not a demon. At best, he is one of the celestial beings, but it may be that the word is merely a colorful metaphor and does not imply that there is any actual being with that name. Nor is Satan opposed to God. At worst, he is simply a devil’s advocate drawing God’s attention to things that appear to be wrong. "Kaufmann Kohler’s theory, in his “Jewish Theology”, chapter 31, is that just as the serpent in the creation story “represents the evil inclination which arises in man with his first consciousness of freedom”, so Satan is an allegorical [fictional] figure “representing the evil of the world, both physical and moral”. "In post-Biblical Jewish sources there are very few references to Satan, and those that are found have no dogmatic or authoritative significance. Satan continues to represent the impersonal force of evil; thus, the Tosefta Shabbat advises that one should “not go on a journey with a wicked man, because Satan accompanies him”. In Jewish liturgy the few references to Satan are all impersonal, for instance the evening prayer that God may remove the adversary “from before us and behind us”, and the morning prayer for protection from “the destroying adversary”. "Popular lore has a far stronger notion of Satan deriving from the New Testament. There he not only personifies the spirit of evil but assumes an independent personality hostile to Jesus and to God. As a result, Milton, writing in an age when people regarded Satan as the presiding demon in stark opposition to God, was able, at least in the first two or three books of “Paradise Lost”, to draw a sympathetic picture of Satan and turn him into almost an epic hero. "For Judaism, all this goes much too far." Last, from Dr. Helen Bond: "There's no kind of prince of darkness; somebody who stands in opposites to God. Throughout most of the texts, there's no concept at all of an evil force"__Dr. Helen Bond, MTheol PhD, Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland. Quote from "The History Of The Devil".
    1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. I wonder if the public realizes that it is very wealthy socialists, who are practicing capitalists, that control the Democratic Party, Bernie's radicals, and the CPUSA? Not only do they control the CPUSA, they control and fund what people think of as co_mmunism around the world. The people in control are wealthy elite snobs (banking, insurance, stock market), at Wall Street and London. In fact, Occupy Wall Street was payed for by this very elite lot, residing at Wall Street itself, with many claiming that they're Democrats or Progressives. It has been this way since 1900 when the Rhodes' roundtable groups came to be. In fact, this is the CFR and RIIA lot. Some of the "Bernie Bros" of the sixties found out, and there were riots. That is why Malcolm X was killed, and several other's lives were destroyed.These radical idiots, like the Bernie Bros and Antifa, are fighting against the very people that pay for and run their cause (Rockefellers, Soros, etc). It is an elitist scam and protection racket used to bring about international socialism (world government / Federalism), and to protect their manufacturing and slavery in Asia, which they moved there to start with. Bernie's Bros are supporting the very people that took their good jobs. Bernie's lot are the paid trouble-makers and rioters used as an excuse to change law. From above and from below. I'm waiting for these idiots to wake up and see that they were conned in a huge way. The fight between Bernie and Warren is staged; a school play. It was this way, the other day, with the protesters showing up at a Pelosi speech. The sad part is, there are people naive and dumb enough to believe it.
    1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. The DNC has never been one for rules (Boss Tweed, Tammany Hall, etc). That is how Truman became VP at the last minute, during a convention, but of course that was a good thing, as the incumbent VP was a radical communist. It doesn't say much about FDR, nor the party, for picking Henry Wallace to start with. However, FDR's administration was filled with them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_Democratic_Party_vice_presidential_candidate_selection It seems that the Democratic Party has had a similar problem on their hands during the last several presidential elections. COINTELPRO was designed to keep them out, but the Democrats had its teeth pulled, via the Church Committee, and loaded up the FBI's counterintelligence with socialists. To be honest, I believe this to have been going on since GHW Bush became president, if not before. Since 1992, the same globalist plan has been pushed by every president, except Trump. Two Bushes, a Clinton, and an Obama, all the same beasts. In 1992, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) was held in Rio. "In 1992, the first conference of its kind, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), commonly referred to as the Rio Conference or Earth Summit, succeeded in raising public awareness of the need to integrate environment and development. The conference drew 109 heads of state to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to address what were dubbed urgent problems of environmental protection and socio-economic development. The Earth Summit influenced subsequent UN conferences, including Rio+20 and set the global green agenda. 'The World Conference on Human Rights, for example, focused on the right of people to a healthy environment and the right to development; controversial demands that had met with resistance from some Member States until the Earth Summit.'" The US was sold out during this event. This is why they tried to keep Trump out, as the TPP would have closed the deal. Trump canned the TPP during January, 2017. 2022 is to be their next meeting, and everything was supposed to be implemented by 2021. They've held an agenda meeting every ten years since 1992. 2012 was another year, and that was when Obama and his fellow socialists started pulling off their antics by repealing Smith-Mundt. Fake news was born. The SJWs, and their MSM supporters, started then.
    1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819.  @theicepickthatkilledtrotsk658  The Anglo-American Establishment's internationalists essentially created the USSR and the PRC. Both times, western manufacturers poured in, and built up their manufacturing and energy sectors while taking advantage of the greedy and corrupt politicos wants at the top of each government. Western economists went into the USSR to write their first five year plans. Essentially, they created both nations to be slave labor workhouses for cheap goods, and forced the industrial revolution on them. The Russians sold every ounce of grain that they could produce to invest more into industry, which caused the genocide. It was stoked by the fear of Germany invading after WWI. Stalin slipped his leash during WWII, so the establishment quickly set their sights on using Mao. The establishment had put everything into motion by the early seventies under Nixon. While building up the PRC, they used the Russian mob (that became the oligarchs), as well as certain figures within their government who were in the pocket of the US, to undermine the nation, and they found their time to strike come when the USSR invaded Afghanistan after the 1978 coup. Afghanistan had old alliances with the US in opium going back to the Opium War days. They used Afghanistan to create their version of Vietnam for the Russians. When it was collapsing, it was the corrupt people who had become the oligarchs that took over under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and they were backed by the Anglo-American Establishment. Slavery in the west never ended; the establishment just moved it east. Worse, some want to turn the US into an amoral and corrupt oligarch run nation much like Russia is run today, while others want to turn it into another communist China.
    1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. Socialists do not understand capital nor capitalism. One must keep investing money for the corporation to operate. Capital (relating to or being assets that add to the long-term net worth of a corporation) comes from corporate money and/or bank loans. That money is called capital expenditure, capital investment, and capital reinvestment. The salaries of the CEO and stockholders are paid from the profits of what is being manufactured or grown. The corporation is another person (a legal invisible entity), compared to the stockholders and CEO. If the business is unincorporated, capitalism still works in a similar manner, without the invisible entity. The socialist's problems are jealousy and greed, nothing more. They want those extra dollars being paid as salaries to the owner(s), as well as what is within the company's bank account. They do not care if the company collapses, and they surely do not understand competition in the free market, which keeps product prices low. Although, I do agree that some CEO's salaries are exorbitant, which damages the company, and you really see this in nationalized companies under socialist governance. Because of the Soviet Union's socialist policies, the capital invested in their first manufacturing plants was never continued. Buildings and machinery wear out. When the Soviet state fell, their industrial machinery was worn out, and that machinery was within old buildings that were falling apart. The politicians, who controlled these state-run corporations, at the top, took all the profits for themselves and the state, instead of reinvesting. Venezuela is another prime example. The socialist's nationalization (thievery) ideology is old, going back to the French Revolution. A revolutionary leader, Georges Danton, is a good example of the socialist's thievery and skulduggery. "The most serious accusation, which haunted him [Danton] during his arrest and formed a chief ground for his execution, was his alleged involvement with a scheme to appropriate the wealth of the French East India Company. During the reign of the Old Regime, the original French East India Company went bankrupt. It was later revived in 1785, backed by royal patronage. The Company eventually fell under the notice of the National Convention for profiteering during the war. The Company was soon liquidated while certain members of the Convention tried to push through a decree that would cause the share prices to rise before the liquidation. Discovery of the profits from this insider trading led to the blackmailing of the directors of the Company to turn over half a million livres to known associates of Danton." Sound familiar today?
    1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. It's not foreign business coming in to rape and pillage China, then just pay the government off, though these foreign corporations do receive cheap labor. The Chinese government owns many corporations, and those that come in are controlled by the CCP, mainly by stock purchase, which is a requirement. China runs on State Capitalism, (nationalization, partial ownership, etc), and have since Mao. The big lie, told about the Soviet Union and China by the west, is that they were/are communists against capitalism. In reality, both nations supported the worst form of it, the dark sibling of laissez-faire capitalism, that gives capitalism a bad name. What nation, in reality, has openly nationalized the most corporations? Britain? The Soviet Union and China are just advanced forms of that ideology. Also, note what the US Govt has done since 1917. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nationalizations_by_country State Capitalism is what the globalists and UN have been pushing for, and the US has been trying to slowly slip in, since WWII. The Eisenhower Policy, that was confidential for many years, states that the purpose was to push "international capitalism" around the globe. That policy was pushed through to Obama. It is also why a handful of corporations and banks run the roundtable that controls the EU. "State capitalism is an economic system in which the state undertakes commercial (i.e. for-profit) economic activity and where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor and centralized management), or where there is otherwise a dominance of corporatized government agencies (agencies organized along business-management practices) or of publicly listed corporations in which the state has controlling shares. Marxist literature defines state capitalism as a social system combining capitalism with ownership or control by a state—by this definition, a state capitalist country is one where the government controls the economy and essentially acts like a single huge corporation, extracting the surplus value from the workforce in order to invest it in further production. This designation applies regardless of the political aims of the state (even if the state is nominally socialist). Many scholars argue that the Soviet Union and the countries modeled after it, including Maoist China, were state capitalist systems. Many scholars also argue that the current People's Republic of China constitutes a form of state capitalism. "As a term, state capitalism is also used by some in reference to a private capitalist economy controlled by a state—that is, a private economy that is subject to statist economic planning. This term has been used to describe the controlled economies of the Great Powers in the First World War. Alternatively, state capitalism may refer to an economic system where the means of production are privately owned, but the state has considerable control over the allocation of credit and investment, as in the case of France during the period of dirigisme after the Second World War. Other examples include the economies of Denmark, Norway and Sweden which have almost equal mixtures of private and state ownership. These countries have enough state ownership and regulation to be legitimately labeled forms of democratic state capitalism. Theoretically, a system that has complete state ownership of the economy but is democratic would be called democratic state capitalism. Systems where an authoritarian state has full control of the economy are called authoritarian state capitalist systems. An existing example of this type of system would be North Korea. "State capitalism has also come to be used sometimes interchangeably with state monopoly capitalism to describe a system where the state intervenes in the economy to protect and advance the interests of large-scale businesses. Noam Chomsky, a libertarian socialist, applies the term 'state capitalism' to economies such as that of the United States, where large enterprises that are deemed "too big to fail" receive publicly funded government bailouts that mitigate the firms' assumption of risk and undermine market laws, and where private production is largely funded by the state at public expense, but private owners reap the profits. This practice is in contrast with the ideals of both socialism and laissez-faire capitalism. "There are various theories and critiques of state capitalism, some of which existed before the 1917 October Revolution. The common themes among them identify that the workers do not meaningfully control the means of production and that capitalist social relations and production for profit still occur within state capitalism. In Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1880), Friedrich Engels argued that state ownership does not do away with capitalism by itself, but rather would be the final stage of capitalism, consisting of ownership and management of large-scale production and communication by the bourgeois state. He argued that the tools for ending capitalism are found in state capitalism." "After the October Revolution, Lenin used the term positively. In spring 1918, during a brief period of economic liberalism prior to the introduction of war communism and again during the New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921, Lenin justified the introduction of state capitalism controlled politically by the dictatorship of the proletariat to further central control and develop the productive forces: 'Reality tells us that state capitalism would be a step forward. If in a small space of time we could achieve state capitalism, that would be a victory.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism
    1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849.  Leocardia Emanuel  I'll have to find the book, it's here, somewhere, but the Bailey's company did pay for that, whether it was just the interior, etc, I'm not sure. The idea came from Russell. They supposedly worked with Hammarskjöld, the designer. There were a lot of politicos and wealthy elite involved with Bailey's group, and their publishing company publishes for the UN. The original room was by the Laymen's Home Missionary Movement. (Charles Taze Russell). Then we have Robert Muller. "Robert Muller (b. 1923) joined the United Nations in 1951, soon after its birth. He was the assistant to three Secretary-Generals. He was director of the Secretary-General’s Office and director of the UN Economic and Social Council (UNESCO). "The Robert Muller School World Core Curriculum Manual (1986) was published by the Lucis Publishing Company. The preface says: “'The underlying philosophy upon which the Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey, by the Tibetan teacher, Djwhal Khul.'" Below is from a search, for their website, which I'm banned from, BTW. "Good Will, Ethical Responsibility & the Sustainable. "From the opening address to World Goodwill Seminar, UN Headquarters, Geneva. ... The United Nations HQ in New York has a so called Meditation Room dedicated to ... in for example the movie “Tomorrow”6, which has also been published as a book. ... Discipleship in the New Age, 1955, Alice A. Bailey, Lucis Press, NY."
    1
  1850.  Leocardia Emanuel  Bailey's claim was, believe it or not, was that Freemasonry was the world's oldest religion. That is a crock of bull, as the fraternity was founded in 1717. However, this is what the Bailey's believed, and wanted to create a world religion, hoping that the fraternity would change back, somehow, to antiquity. She was from Britain, after all. The Mormons, did, create a religion from it. Martinism was created in Europe from it, as well. What the Masonic fraternity is actually for, is to open one's eyes to the world, and it's many different religions and cultures. It teaches one to study them, (comparative religion), which is known as taking the Pilgrim's Path. It doesn't mean to join them, as the fraternity is based upon Judaeo-Christianity, but it's about learning the different cultures. The other lessons are becoming a moral man, no matter your religion, and to promote secondary education. In the Grand Orient Lodges, in Europe, the belief in God is unnecessary. In the US and UK, it is required. A Lodge is set up sort-of similar to a parliament, inside, and works similar to one, for business, which teaches those skills. Union halls got their idea from this, as, after all, Freemasonry would have been the world's oldest labor union, not a religion. It was created from the older guilds. Blavatsky promoted a similar idea as Bailey, as she claimed to have visited a few Lodges in Europe. However, her beliefs were in eastern theology. That became a fad, after Europe began trading with the east. There's actually a religion, based upon these eastern teachings, in Israel, about worshiping the Bab, tied to the Shiites. Their temple is of Greek architecture, and looks awful similar to the buildings in DC. They also want a world religion, promote the UN, and they're into the green movement, etc. Look into Babism, the Alawites, and the Druze.
    1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. The Epoch Times had an article about Rosenstein, where Rosenstein insinuated that what he signed, and what was given to the court, weren't the same. He insinuated that what he read, in the document, was different than what was presented to the court. This can be traced back to Obama, Brennan, and bad actors in both the DNC and GOP. The Progressives, or the Old Guard faction, which are within both political parties. Quoting Wikipedia: "The Old Guard faction was an organized group in the Socialist Party of America (SPA) that sought to retain the organization's traditional orientation towards electoral politics by fighting the Militant faction of generally-younger party members who factionally organized to promote greater efforts at direct action in advancing the cause of revolutionary socialism. "The Old Guard had its roots as the "Regulars" in the inner party factional war of 1919, which resulted in the fragmentation of the Socialist Party into the Communist Party of America and Communist Labor Party of America. In 1935, the personal and political friction between the Old Guard and the Militants (and their "Progressive" allies) led to an organizational split, with the Old Guard faction leaving to establish the Social Democratic Federation (SDF)." "The Old Guard and their Militant foes both hailed from the broad Marxist tradition, the former seeing democracy as a positive value in itself and emphasizing the efficacy of the electoral road to power while the latter tended to see democracy as a sort of chimera, a tactical expedient propagated by the bourgeois in its maintenance of class power. Beyond this important analytical difference, the divide between these two factional groupings was largely generational, with the Old Guard dominated by middle aged party veterans of large standing while newcomers into the Socialist Party during the Depression years of the early 1930s tended to gravitate as a younger and more aggressive caucus."
    1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. I wouldn't go so far as to call the pope a commie, though he is supportive of them. The pope is a National Socialist, (he doesn't openly promote the anarchy of the farther left that I've witnessed), and he has always been known the be a Peronist. Juan Domingo Perón supported the Nazis that fled to Argentina and Chile, as well as their ideology. In certain areas of Argentina, they still celebrate Hitler's birthday. It was the Roman Catholic Church that helped the Nazis escape justice, and placed them throughout Europe as part of Operation Gladio, to fight the Communist influence from Russia. The OSS and the C_A were also behind this, along with Gehlen Org. The ideology behind the New World Order, especially in the EU, is based upon National Socialist ideology (Bush, Dulles brothers, et al too). The EU's roots can be traced back to the Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe) which was a Nazi plan that included the Kalergi plan. This is where they also crawled into bed with the Muslims and Muslim Brotherhood, under the Nazi regime. Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem got on well. Hitler put him on the payroll and gave him a nice flat in Berlin. Before the Russians advanced close enough, they put the Grand Mufti on a plane back to Egypt, where he met up with his cousin, Yasser Arafat. The Soviets recruited Arafat, the KGB trained him, then gave him fake papers, and placed him in Palestine as the head of the PLO. Since the end of WWII, the Germans and Russians have been working together for energy resources in the Middle-East. Also, out of this cabal, was the formation of Gazprom.
    1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. Red-Pilled Woman: Below is a list of tactics that the book gave for COINTELPRO, once the FBI infiltrated a New Left group. Quote, page 236: Function 1 Create a negative public image 2 Break down internal organization 3 Create dissension between groups [example, Antifa against Alt-Right] 4 Restrict access to group-level resources 5 Restrict ability to protest 6 Hinder the ability of individual targets to participate in group activities 7 Displace conflict 8 Gather information (intelligence) Form A Send anonymous letter B Send fake (signed) letter C Send articles or “public source documents” D Supply information to officials E Plant evidence F Utilize informants G Utilize media source [propaganda] H Disseminate Bureau-generated information about targets I Interview targets J Supply misinformation [propaganda] K Make fake phone call L Actively harass targets M Supply resources to anti–New Left groups P Send ridiculing information My words in [brackets]. He goes on to talk about 9/11, and how we used that to not only bring back COINTELPRO, and legalize it, but we expounded upon it. Of course, he hates it, but the left doesn't play fair, especially the radicals here, the Russians, or their radical Muslims who they fund. There will not be any more Bill Ayers being released over no warrants being issued for wiretaps. I would say that the FBI has allowed the New Left's Antifa and Alt-Right do what they do, so the public can see what they are. I'm looking for a major crackdown starting on Nov. 4th. Antifa and the Alt-Right don't know it, but they've been played.
    1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. "As OPEC members grew weary of a multi-year supply contest with diminishing returns and shrinking financial reserves, the organization finally attempted its first production cut since 2008. Despite many political obstacles, a September 2016 decision to trim approximately 1 million barrels per day was codified by a new quota agreement at the November 2016 OPEC conference. The agreement (which exempted disruption-ridden members Libya and Nigeria) covered the first half of 2017 – alongside promised reductions from Russia and ten other non-members, offset by expected increases in the US shale sector, Libya, Nigeria, spare capacity, and surging late-2016 OPEC production before the cuts took effect. Indonesia announced another "temporary suspension" of its OPEC membership, rather than accepting the organization's requested 5 percent production cut."__Wikipedia on OPEC, citing Bloomberg. Why did OPEC, and a handful of other nations, decide on a production cut in September 2016, just before the US election? What does a cut gain them, and who does it hurt? Their supposed reason was "diminishing returns and shrinking financial reserves," which means that they wanted the price of crude to go up. However, what about an incoming US President that was intending on investigating things that occurred within these very nations? By the way, the meeting where OPEC made the decision was in Houston. Are any of the old Yukos Oil executives still in Houston or London? There is a reason for Trump announcing that the US would become an exporter not long after the election. Did you know that Russia has controlled the MB since at least 1945?
    1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. I highly doubt finding a home in Appalachia, with a dirt floor, including those in the heads of hollows, unless it is one preserved by the state. You may find some old clapboard four room homes built similar to the sharecropper's shacks, but yet, they have wood floors. I'd say that the last of the dirt-floored cabins had burned or rotted down by the 1940s-50s. You will find many "company homes" in the hollows, built by the coal companies. What both JFK and LBJ claimed about Appalachia, in the 60s, was a lie. It was a hoax, used to mix whites with blacks, to bring about welfare, etc. The Beverley Hillbillies was filmed as propaganda to promote it, and it gave Appalachia a bad name. By the 1940s, the coal fields, which were the poorest region, were unionized, and people lived pretty well off. When you traveled to the major river valleys, such as along the Ohio River, steel mills employed the people, which were fed by the coal from those mines. At that, it wasn't a lie started by either JFK or LBJ, but Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, where Eleanor had selected West Virginia as her showcase. There, she had an entire village built, with a furniture factory, as her little socialist project, and it failed spectacularly. The houses were prefab homes, not insulated, and the people almost froze to death during their first winter. Some of those homes are still there, which were remodeled, but that factory failed not long after it started. The project was started, to make the claim that those poor whites needed FDR's New Deal socialism. JFK and LBJ expanded upon it, to buy the black vote. You will find, that many of the claims made by the Democratic Party, have no truth to them.
    1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. Follow the earth's axial tilt. As that changes, the northern hemisphere warms and cools over a 40,000 year span due to where the sun strikes the earth. It's vice versa for the southern. There are orbital variations as well. Orbital Variations : "Changes in orbital eccentricity affect the Earth-sun distance. Currently, a difference of only 3 percent (5 million kilometers) exists between closest approach (perihelion), which occurs on or about January 3, and furthest departure (aphelion), which occurs on or about July 4. This difference in distance amounts to about a 6 percent increase in incoming solar radiation (insolation) from July to January. The shape of the Earth’s orbit changes from being elliptical (high eccentricity) to being nearly circular (low eccentricity) in a cycle that takes between 90,000 and 100,000 years. When the orbit is highly elliptical, the amount of insolation received at perihelion would be on the order of 20 to 30 percent greater than at aphelion, resulting in a substantially different climate from what we experience today." Obliquity (change in axial tilt) : "As the axial tilt increases, the seasonal contrast increases so that winters are colder and summers are warmer in both hemispheres. Today, the Earth's axis is tilted 23.5 degrees from the plane of its orbit around the sun. But this tilt changes. During a cycle that averages about 40,000 years, the tilt of the axis varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. Because this tilt changes, the seasons as we know them can become exaggerated. More tilt means more severe seasons—warmer summers and colder winters; less tilt means less severe seasons—cooler summers and milder winters. It's the cool summers that are thought to allow snow and ice to last from year-to-year in high latitudes, eventually building up into massive ice sheets. There are positive feedbacks in the climate system as well, because an Earth covered with more snow reflects more of the sun's energy into space, causing additional cooling."__NASA What a wicked web some weave for a power and money grab.
    1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. I don't know if that can be proven. We're dealing with academics, who've never made beer or wine, and who think that the ergot fungus was accidentally introduced, while others think they knew about it, and added it. Medicine didn't make use of it until the 16th century. "The most prominent member of this group is Claviceps purpurea ("rye ergot fungus"). This fungus grows on rye and related plants, and produces alkaloids that can cause ergotism in humans and other mammals who consume grains contaminated with its fruiting structure (called ergot sclerotium)." Animals, such as cattle, eat the entire plant, and not just the seeds hidden away in their sheaths. It may have been introduced to the seeds by those cultivating it. The fungus grows on the shafts of tall grasses, such as wheat, rye, barley, etc. Whether any can be on the seeds, especially after they're separated from the chaff, is debatable. Next, the seeds are malted, meaning they are wetted, and allowed to sprout, turning the starch to sugar. When the sprouts appear, the seeds are then roasted, stopping the process. What this can do to any lingering ergotamine is unknown. After this, they are milled and added to warm water, where yeast is added, causing it to ferment. It's strained and filtered, leaving beer. As far as wine, I do not believe that ergot fungus grows on grapes. I'm of the belief that the priests or shamans added opium in Eurasia. "Opium has been actively collected since approximately 3400 BC." There may have been other chemicals they added, that are unknown. I believe that this was investigated, when they were studying the Eleusinian Mysteries (Greek rite of passage for young males, where they were raped and sodomized). This rite is actually more ancient than any other, and was found to still be practiced with the Asmat People in Papua, New Guinea.
    1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. Let;s try this again. Look over the political platform from 2004 below, and compare it to the Democratic Party's platform. Provide free health care for everyone Expand funding for HIV/AIDS programs Provide reproductive rights and health care for women Fully fund public education from pre-K through college Increase federal spending for job programs for minorities Increase aid and job creation in rural areas Continue price supports and subsidies to family farmers Raise minimum wage to living-wage standard Expand Section 8 and other affordable housing measures Do not privatize Social Security Outlaw racial profiling Abolish the death penalty Institute alternative sentencing for non-violent crimes End discrimination based on sexual orientation Pull the U.S. troops out of Iraq Stop development and testing of nuclear weapons Repeal NAFTA Develop renewable energy alternatives Repeal Healthy Forests and Clear Skies Acts Ratify Kyoto Treaty Increase access education for immigrants Repeal tax cuts for the rich Restore tax rates on the wealthy and corporations to 1970 levels Repeal the Patriot Act Fund enforcement of the Voting Rights Act 2004 Communist Party USA's platform. In 2010, in a report prepared for the Communist Party's 29th National Convention, several members of the Young Communist League USA wrote; "Currently, the conditions rarely if ever allow us to run open Communists for office. When members do run for office, it is within the auspices of the Democratic Party. Otherwise, we find ourselves supporting progressive (and in some instances not-so-progressive) Democratic candidates. Despite how much many of us would love to run comrades for office as Communists, we all agree that this is how we currently have to function in this political climate." http://www.cpusa.org/party_voices/convention-discussion-a-time-to-grow/
    1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994.  @SspaceB  The origin of the word, which is shatan, comes from Persia, specifically Zoroastrian. It's original meaning was that God had two sides, both good and evil, or yin and yang as with the Asiatic belief. When the Persians invaded the Levant, they called the people of the Levant the shatan, or the adversary. Orthodox ####ism is the same, as they do not believe in a separate entity that creates evil. Any orthodox Rabbi will state this. In the NT, Jesus called Peter satan: "Get behind me satan." Being a Rabbi, and using his Hebrew language, Jesus was calling Peter an "adversary," or stumbling block, not some invisible evil being. The word literally means an adversary, or someone that blocks progress. It only became associated with an invisible entity in Job, but it was the angel's job, not its name. Orthodox Hebrews don't believe in this either, and especially what was written in Enoch. Hellenism is the basis for this belief, as there was a Hellenist sect within the Hebrews centered around Antioch, where Paul was from, who believed in some of the Greek's multi-deity beliefs, such as Pluto or Hades, the god of gold and the underworld, which became their Satan. The orthodox Hebrews have never believed this, and still base God upon Isaiah 45:5-7 in the Tanakh : 5) I am the Lord, and there is no other; besides Me there is no God: I will strengthen you although you have not known Me. 6) In order that they know from the shining of the sun and from the west that there is no one besides Me; I am the Lord and there is no other. 7) Who forms light and creates darkness, Who makes peace and creates evil; I am the Lord, Who makes all these. Since man was made in the image of God, man has a dual personality, that of good and evil. There is no "the devil made me do it." Genesis is a rewritten account from ancient Mesopotamia, where they believed in multiple gods and goddesses. However, it is a Hebrew allegorical metaphor that means something else. Any Rabbi will state this, as the serpent in the garden is knowledge; specifically the knowledge of death, which separates man from beast. The Torah is completely written in allegory and metaphor. In the Tanakh, satan is always written as "ha satan," or the adversary. God is even called the satan, when speaking to David about the census. See: The Origin of Satan, by Elaine Pagels PhD, (1995). She is an American historian of religion, and the Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion at Princeton University. She received her PhD at Harvard. Book: "Who is Satan in the New Testament, and what is the evil that he represents? In this groundbreaking book, Elaine Pagels, Princeton's distinguished historian of religion, traces the evolution of Satan from its origins in the Hebrew Bible, where Satan is at first merely obstructive, to the New Testament, where Satan becomes the Prince of Darkness, the bitter enemy of God and man, evil incarnate. In The Origin of Satan, Pagels shows that the four Christian gospels tell two very different stories. The first is the story of Jesus' moral genius: his lessons of love, forgiveness, and redemption. The second tells of the bitter conflict between the followers of Jesus and their fellow ####, a conflict in which the writers of the four gospels condemned as creatures of Satan, those #### who refused to worship Jesus as the Messiah. Writing during and just after the ###### war against Rome, the evangelists invoked Satan to portray their ###### enemies as God's enemies too. As Pagels then shows, the church later turned this satanic indictment against its Roman enemies, declaring that pagans and infidels were also creatures of Satan, and against its own dissenters, calling them heretics and ascribing their heterodox views to satanic influences."
    1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. I think it was Bannon, who was ready to go, and they planned it. What Bannon spoke about, that I've heard, was the truth, about an economic war with China. That was discussed early on, at several places, just after the election. It was discussed that it was the real reason for our Navy being there, and that we are keeping an eye on those artificial islands in the South China Sea. It has been discussed, that China had their eyes on the Indochina countries in the south, looking to do an expansion and takeover. It has to do about them using other currency but the dollar for oil, and the manipulation of the Yuan. China was in cahoots with Russia on dropping the dollar to pay for oil. China was also making a run on precious metals, and started selling fake bullion. China is one of the largest counterfeiters in US currency. People are not aware of this, but if you know where to go for news, you hear about it all. Bannon was correct, about a war with North Korea, and what would happen to Seoul, if it happened. There would be no saving them, as they are too close to the border. We used them to place our military in the area. What surprised me, was Bannon admitting to this, when I thought that they would keep this quite for much longer. This is still about communist country expansion, and their threatening the US economy. It is what the Korean, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Iraq wars were about, and it is why we're in Syria now, and fighting with Yemen. It is the same policy laid out by Eisenhower, which the new left (communist left) have been fighting against. Does anyone remember how Jerry Brown got awfully cozy to China, when they spoke about seceding? What about the Clinton Democrats crawling into bed with China? China's economy, right now, is a bubble waiting to be popped.
    1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. The problem with the general public, is that they do not seem to understand just how corrupt DC is, or how to see beneath the lies that are spoon fed to them by the media. I listened to one of our Generals, not long back, state how our military was there to serve the "public interest" around the world. What is that public interest? Money, and the economy. Bill Clinton stated it best, years back, when he said "It's the economy, stupid"! The US economies collapse can be traced back to Lyndon Johnson, who's Great Society and Vietnam was responsible for the collapse of the 1944 Bretton-Woods Agreement, which threw the US into a trade imbalance with Asia. We had also become involved in deposing the rulers of the new Middle-Eastern states, via the CIA, starting with Iran, because they nationalized what is now BP Oil. Ike cut a deal with Britain, in that if we would help start a coup to overthrow Mosaddegh, then US oil companies could join BP in Iran. We've been in the Middle-East ever since, fighting proxy wars against the Russian controlled socialist states. It is the US and its allies, against Russia and its allies. Bretton-Woods had the dollar pegged to gold. When that collapsed, Nixon was stuck with the mess, and that is when he made the dollar a floating currency, and began to tie the dollar to oil through OPEC. Nixon also went after the Great Society programs, and we see what the left did to him. Today, look at Syria. Obama, Kerry, and Hillary lied through their teeth, about it being about human rights. It was about an oil and gas pipeline to feed Europe. The pipeline we wanted, would start in Qatar, run through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Syria, then end in Turkey to supply Europe. Assad said no to this, because he and Russia wanted a pipeline to run from Iran to Turkey. The US military is setting on the very land that a pipeline would cross, right now, in Syria. RFK Jr. exposed this back in 2016. Is it in the public interest? Yes, it is. Would we rather have Russia controlling the energy resources, or the US, which our dollar is tied to? This is why Russia and China made an agreement to use the Chinese yuan for oil, which they will convert to gold. It would destroy the petro-dollar, and collapse the US economy.
    1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. The truth about why the US military is all over the world can be traced back to the Atlantic Charter and the creation of the UN under the guise of Lend-Lease. "cash-and-carry" / Neutrality Act of 1939: In September of 1939, Roosevelt persuaded Congress to pass a "cash-and-carry" provision that allowed warring nations to buy U.S. arms as long as they paid cash and transported them in their own ships. This was done in spite of many in the US not wanting these sales to happen. Lend-Lease Act: By late 1940, however, Britain had no more cash to spend in the arsenal of "democracy." Roosevelt tried to help by suggesting a new plan that he called a lend-lease policy. Under this plan, the president would lend or lease arms and other supplies to "any country whose defense was vital to the United States. The act was passed in 1941. Atlantic Charter / "A Declaration of the United Nations": The Atlantic Charter was a joint declaration released by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on August 14, 1941 following a meeting of the two heads of state in Newfoundland. Although Churchill hoped for a military commitment, he settled for a joint declaration of war aims, called the Atlantic Charter. Both countries pledged the following: collective security, disarmament, self-determination, economic cooperation, and freedom of the seas. The Atlantic Charter became the basis of a new document called "A Declaration of the United Nations." The term United Nations was suggested by Roosevelt to express the common purpose of the Allies, those nations that had fought the Axis powers. The declaration was signed by 26 nations, "four-fifths of the human race" observed Churchill. Essentially, the US became the world police through the UN. GHW Bush stated that he would revitalize the US role as the world police for the New World Order (UN). The UN was the NWO 2, as the failed League of Nations was the first. It was all pre-planned, and the idea of a NWO dates back to the 1800s, before Cecil Rhodes, though Rhodes and Milner brought it into life.
    1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. What one needs to understand about the Islamic Middle-East is that there are two religious factions, the mystics and the orthodox. The mystics (Sufi/Sunni) generally always side with the socialists. Then, there are two political factions in all Muslim countries, where there is a socialist-left such as that of the old Baath Party in Iraq under Saddam, the Red Prince and Al-Waleed in Saudi Arabia, Assad in Syria (Baath Party), and the politics of Iran under the Mullahs. The leftwing is behind what we see today, and this is why they ally themselves with Russia and China. Ask yourself which ex-President of the US put Saddam Hussein in power (1979) before he became president? Saddam officially ruled over Iraq several years before 1979, starting in 1976. Then, ask yourself, who put the Assad family in power (1971) via a coup? Where were Bush and Cheney during those years? "Saddam formally rose to power in 1979, although he had already been the de facto head of Iraq for several years. " "In 1976, Saddam rose to the position of general in the Iraqi armed forces and rapidly became the strongman of the government. As the ailing, elderly al-Bakr became unable to execute his duties, Saddam took on an increasingly prominent role as the face of the government both internally and externally. He soon became the architect of Iraq's foreign policy and represented the nation in all diplomatic situations. He was the de facto leader of Iraq some years before he formally came to power in 1979." "In 1971, President Richard Nixon appointed [George H W] Bush as Ambassador to the United Nations, and he became Chairman of the Republican National Committee in 1973. The following year, President Gerald Ford appointed him Chief of the Liaison Office in China and later made him the director of Central Intelligence [1976-77]." Cheney "began his political career as an intern for Congressman William A. Steiger, eventually working his way into the White House during the Nixon and Ford administrations, where he later served as the White House chief of staff, from 1975 to 1977. In 1978, Cheney was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives representing Wyoming's at-large congressional district from 1979 to 1989; he was reelected five times, briefly serving as House minority whip in 1989. Cheney was selected to be the secretary of defense during the presidency of George H. W. Bush, holding the position for the majority of Bush's term from 1989 to 1993.[6] During his time in the Department of Defense, Cheney oversaw the 1991 Operation Desert Storm, among other actions. Out of office during the Clinton administration, Cheney was the Chairman and CEO of Halliburton Company from 1995 to 2000." "I was blind but now I see." Wake up, folks!
    1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137.  @danmoritz3319  You still don't get it, do you? The Whigs were courting socialism when it started. Horace Greely, a Whig close to Clay, happily published Marx's screeds in his New York newspaper, and Lincoln became a pen pal of Marx. The Roosevelt family in New York were big followers of Marx as well. It was within the Protestant denominations by the late 1800s, though it came in with the Anabaptists, and it had infected the Episcopalians in Boston, (Church of the Carpenter and a few others), and then came to New York. That's why it was within Columbia U by 1900. They were called "Christian Socialists." That is the same university, along with two other New York colleges, which brought the Frankfurt School professors in under Dewey. Before that, they were involved in forming the Rand School of Social Science, where Trotsky was lecturing before he left to meet up with Lenin at Saint Petersburg. After Trotsky fled to Mexico, Dewey made a trip down there to "prove Trotsky's innocence." The grads from Columbia U became the New York Intellectuals, who infected both parties that were already infected by Roosevelt's big government and socialist progressivism. The grads infiltrated the GOP by the early fifties and created the Neoconservatives. Roosevelt's progressivism was Federalist Socialism, and Wilson was a proud follower as well. Old Jeffersonian Republican belief, which is what 45 wanted to bring back, and why he favored Jackson, was almost stomped out after the Civil War, courtesy of the new GOP.
    1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. What the Democrats essentially did, was a reverse of what Nixon did. Nixon was looking for dirt on McGovern's ties to the Communist Party, and evidence that would lead to the two prostitution rings, ran by the DNC, in a building across from the Watergate building (per G. Gordon Liddy). Nixon was being spied upon by the DNC, and the Communist Party, within the US, and they were looking to set him up. It was Nixon who added the vox tape recorder to the Oval Office in 1970, to keep a record of everything said, because of the left spying on him. That way, they couldn't lie about anything stated in the White House, or threaten him. Under Obama, they used the Patriot Act to spy on the right, and unmask names. They also concocted a lie about Russians. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/07/29/Watergate-burglars-sought-McGovern-links-to-communists/6332459921600/ Here's where it gets interesting. It was the FBI who informed Nixon, about the prostitution rings. When Mark Felt (Deep Throat) wasn't selected for the director of the FBI, he ran to the Washington Post. Felt was a leaker, sound familiar? Felt was also involved in exposing COINTELPRO. While at Yale, Hillary Clinton clerked for a Californian law firm, ran by two known and admitted communists. Also, her and Bill were campaigning for McGovern. At the Democratic National Convention, it was the communists who started a fight, and a riot, led by none other than Bill Ayers, who was backing McGovern. Later, Hillary was put on the special prosecutor's team, for Watergate, not long after graduating. She was booted out of the team for unethical behavior. The prosecutor stated that her ideology was to deny Nixon his constitution rights. She didn't have a law license then, nor could she ever pass the bar in DC. After this, was when many Democrat politicians moved from the far-left to center. Now, though, they've moved back to where they were under Johnson. Many of them are preaching the same New Communist Movement rhetoric. The press tells nothing truthful about Watergate, leaving a mountain of fact out of it. Read G. Gordon Liddy's book: "Will." It's an eye opener.
    1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. Progressivism is nothing but slow-burn socialism, which leads to its creators, the Fabian Socialists. The Fabians admitted that their plan was to slowly install socialism, worldwide, over time. The Progressives are the "new socialist" politicians, or the neocons and neoliberals, and the major difference between this lot and the Communists is that the Communists demand radical change immediately, setting up a system similar to feudalism, through anarchy and violent protest, whereas the Progressives wish to slowly bring it about, which they have, now, over the past hundred years, and they pretty much succeeded in doing everything they set out to do. It started with the socialists on Wallstreet and their friends in London, who pretty much pulled off a coup with the murder of William McKinley, and their installation of Theodore Roosevelt. The Roosevelt family are Dutch nobility, and they married into the DuPonts, Delanos, and Astors. One can look at the Roosevelts history with socialism, especially with Clinton Roosevelt and Horace Greely's support of Karl Marx in New York. The Roosevelt family had even practiced endogamy, (marrying nieces and close cousins), much like the Rothschilds, to keep their money within the family. Starting with Teddy Roosevelt, onward, their progressive ideology more matches that of National Socialism, which is why many politicians, bankers, and industrialists in the US, and in Britain, backed the Nazi Party. One will soon learn that Wallstreet, via the CFR, rules at Pennsylvania Avenue and that the national interest equates to national corporate interest. The entire socialist-progressive globalist plan revolves around international corporations, international trade, and international banking. That is why they wish for no national sovereignty, no borders, and a one-world government. They could care less about human rights. This is why you see the heads of large corporations seated at the UN having discussions about trade and politics, and that is why the EU, the UN's firstborn, was created. The EU's idea came from the Nazis Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe), which incorporated Kalergi's synarchy plan. Both organizations (UN and EU) are cleverly hidden international trade and banking apparatuses, where the IMF, the World Bank, The BIS, and the Federal Reserve are intimately tied together.
    1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163.  @magnusarsland6887  "The World Federalist Movement is a movement that advocates for strengthened and democratic "world institutions" subjected to the "federalist principles" of subsidiarity, solidarity [combining] and democracy." "The first world federalist organization was founded in 1937 by two famous feminists, pacifists, and female suffragists [hard left]: Schwimmer and Lloyd. In 1938, the Federal Union was organized in the United Kingdom. In the U.S., Federal Union (now: Association to Unite the Democracies) [combine them] was established in 1939 calling for a federation of the Atlantic democracies. The Swiss Internationale Bewegung der Weltföderalisten-Schweiz was created in Geneva in 1940. During World War II, anti-fascist resistance movements [communists] shared clandestinely circulated copies of Spinelli's plan for European federation and "global federation." Spinelli later became one of the founding fathers of the European Union. In 1945, the Committee to Frame a World Constitution convened at the University of Chicago and drafted a Constitution for the World. In 1947, five small world federalist organizations came together in Asheville, North Carolina, and agreed to merge as the United World Federalists. "These five groups had, in the previous year, met with representatives of fifteen others in Bern and Hertenstein (Weggis) to discuss creating a worldwide federalist organization. It was one year later, in August 1947, in Montreux, that more than 51 organizations from 24 countries came together at the Conference of the World Movement for World Federal Government (WMFWG). The Conference concluded with the Montreux Declaration." The declaration: "Montreux Declaration (23 August 1947) " "We world federalists meeting in Montreux at the first international congress of the "World Movement for World Federal Government", call upon the peoples of the world to join us in our work." "Federalists had hoped that the anticipated UN review conference (under Article 109 of the UN Charter) in 1955 would move the UN further in the direction of a world federal system. Unfortunately, the lack of political will dissipated any interest in such a conference. Around 1965 however, the Movement had established offices near the United Nations, with American federalist, McVitty, as the Movement's UN observer and advocate. "Some federalists in this period focused on amendments to the United Nations Charter as a way forward. Most involved reforms to institutions such as a more representative Security Council, a World Court with compulsory jurisdiction and judicial review authority and a democratically elected General Assembly (or a world parliament). Federalists proposed a number of new institutions such as a commission on "sustainable development," an "international development authority," a "standing peacekeeping corps" [military] and an "international criminal court." "Notably active world federalist organizations, as of 2019, exist in Australia, Argentina, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States." The same states that are now causing all the problems, and from within the UN.
    1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. It's according to what the media's definition of "world stability" is. To be very honest, that definition is the globalist agenda, and the POTUS is the proverbial turd in the punch bowl. The EU was the start of it, Napoleon's dream come true, and the big push to complete it started when the Bush and Clinton administrations joined forces with Blair in the UK. They worked with ex-Nazis, all radical socialists, in Europe, the UK, and the US. The EU was a US and UK creation, as one EU politician admitted shortly after President Trump was elected. I'll paraphrase: "What are we going to do now, (after Trump), the EU is a US and UK creation?" The idea of the European, Asian, and a North American Unions are a creation of the power elite to enrich themselves by skirting taxes, tariffs, laws, and regulations. It was also a worker replacement scheme, bringing back a form of slavery, and the slaves would vote for their masters. That is the "thousand points of light," and the "new world order" that has been spoken about (and quoted) by many politicians. The World Brotherhood, the UN, and the Atlantic Council at work. They lost control, and they put into place the biggest propaganda effort against the world starting in 2013. Never trust the merchants, merchant banks, and industrialists. Does anyone remember who helped the Ayatollah take control of Iran? It was Jimmy Carter, the same US president that said Jim Jones was a fantastic preacher. Jim Jones was a flaming communist, that run a cult of personality and kept his followers in a concentration camp at Guyana. The NWO, three empires made up of a North American Union under FDR's New Deal Socialism, the EU under National Socialism, and the Asian under Communism. As professor Quigley put it, a balance of power scheme, run by socialists but controlled by merchants, merchant bankers, and industrialists. What family is the largest merchant banker on earth? Who controls the central banks, and the BIS? You can almost count them on one hand.
    1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. Harris and Biden are the puppets of the UN and G7/G20, nothing more. That is the cabal that has been behind everything corrupt since both organs were founded, and coincidentally, each grew exponentially under Nixon, as both the VP and President. Nixon was a Wilsonian, and under he and Ike, they stepped on the accelerator of the UN and NATO over the Atlantic Charter's promises. . When Nixon became president, he was making good use of a very black clandestine group that he was over creating as the VP. From that group came the plumbers, and GHW Bush, who was made the Ambassador to the UN in 1971. Next, in 1973, he was made the head of the RNC, and in 1974, the 2nd Chief of the U.S. Liaison Office to the People's Republic of China under Ford. That was the death knell of the old GOP. It was Nixon, who everyone said was Rockefeller and Kissinger's puppet that started courting Mao. It was part of the globalist plan to redistribute wealth, raising third-world nations up to be the same. A hare-brained scheme. In reality, it was about using them for cheap labor, and a place industry could hide from the new EPA regulations, and labor unions. It was under Nixon, after all, that both "Earth Day," and the EPA were created. Industry had to have a reason to leave, so Nixon and his group created it. . Under Nixon, the G5 was created at the White House, and that grew to become the G7, and the G20. That is the "Liberal International Economic Order," or Bush's NWO. It was Bush that signed the US up for the UN's "sustainable development" scheme at Rio in 1992. Clinton and Gore run with that, shouting global warming! . When you read the eight points of the Atlantic Charter, you can quickly see how it's all about Wilsonian socialism, "free trade," and money. . No territorial gains were to be sought by the United States or the United Kingdom; Territorial adjustments must be in accord with the wishes of the peoples concerned; All people had a right to self-determination; Trade barriers were to be lowered; There was to be global economic co-operation and advancement of social welfare; The participants would work for a world free of want and fear; The participants would work for freedom of the seas; There was to be disarmament of aggressor nations, and a common disarmament after the war. . The entire UN was based off those eight points, where it became the world body for socialism. From Truman to Obama, each president, regardless of political party, has advanced this globalist cabal, except two, JFK, and the President now in office.
    1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236.  @atex6175  I'm speaking of Nixon's entire career, especially from when he was an attorney in California (think mob). Here's what occurred: "Eisenhower gave Nixon responsibilities during his term as vice president—more than any previous vice president. Nixon attended Cabinet and National Security Council meetings and chaired them when Eisenhower was absent. A 1953 tour of the Far East succeeded in increasing local goodwill toward the United States and prompted Nixon to appreciate the potential of the region as an industrial center. He visited Saigon and Hanoi in French Indochina. On his return to the United States at the end of 1953, Nixon increased the amount of time he devoted to foreign relations."_Wikipedia Nixon had ties to the mob. During WWII, the government worked with the mob under Operation Underworld. Nixon, as the VP, created the Forty Committee, and Operation Forty, which were the dirty tricks and black bag operations in the government's new counterintel departments aimed at stopping communism. I support most of that, but not all of what they did, such as the blackmail racket. He was also involved with Robert Maheu, and Robert Vesco, all mob related, and tied to Operation 40. Here, they began using cutouts to work with the mob, especially in both South and Central America, and in the Caribbean. Essentially, we created the Russian oligarchs, who were the Russian mob, and who were used to overthrow the USSR. When Nixon became president, they started flooding into the US, and settled in Brooklyn and elsewhere. They tried to do a similar thing in China, but look how that turned out. This is also where the huge money laundering, and offshore banking web was created. Iran-Contra and several other escapades were tied to this, and globalism was birthed here, especially after Nixon and Kissinger went to China. The shock doctrine came from them as well. Kissinger and his lot has much to do with it. Worse, Ike and Nixon were the UN's first picks, and both backed the New Deal. They were progressives, and were the beginning of Neoconservative (New Right) politics taking over the GOP. The old conservative coalition had kicked the progressives out between 1910-1912. After 1952, they took control. After this, both political parties were infested with progressivism.
    1
  2237.  @atex6175  Oh, they're all corrupt, and people in both parties are working together, which is why we're witnessing what we are. They're putting the UN's agenda (2030) into operation as we speak. The worst, and most insidious thing that they did was to create the riots. They were hoping that the right would rise up, and bring out their guns. That didn't happen. If it would have happened, the UN's gun grab would begin, and they're trying their best to do it anyhow. You can find what the UN has planned on two webpages they have titled: A New Era of Conflict and Violence, and another titled: Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet. "There has been a sizeable increase in the number of attacks carried out by actors with far-right, white nationalist, or anti-Muslim beliefs in both Western Europe and North America in the past two decades. The number of incidents across the two regions increased from three in 2002 to 59 in 2017, with social media playing a crucial role in the dissemination of xenophobic speech and incitement to violence." Also: "The main strategies to prevent disputes from escalating into conflict, and to prevent the recurrence of conflict, are preventive diplomacy and preventive disarmament." "Complementing preventive diplomacy is preventive disarmament, which seeks to reduce the number of small arms in conflict-prone regions. In El Salvador, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Timor-Leste and elsewhere, this has entailed demobilizing combat forces, as well as collecting and destroying their weapons as part of an overall peace agreement. Destroying yesterday’s weapons prevents their use in tomorrow’s wars." They're chomping at the bit to label citizens as DVE's, to take full control.
    1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. Ask yourself, were those so-called hackers Russian Russians, or British Russians? Isn't Britain a foreign state and did they work with HRC and Hussein to rig the US election? What is FVEY? What country is the umbrella that Pakistan is still under? Who are the Awans? What country set the entire Russian narrative in motion? What umbrella is Austrailia under? What nations are under the Commonwealth of Nations? Where did the Russian oligarchs flee? Do any Russians work for GCHQ? Do any Russians have ties to GCHQ's Cybersecurity division? What training did GCHQ give internet trolls in 2014? Why? Where did McCain travel to? Where did Page and Strzok travel to? Why do Hussein, HRC, and Kerry travel to New Zealand? What is the Roundtable Group? What is The Club in London? Where is Orbis? Is Orbis close to GCHQ's Cybersecurity building? Who is Christopher Steeler? Where was Steele stationed at before coming back to Britain? What if some in Britain had been working with Russia since WWI? What if some in the US have been? What is the Pilgrims Society? What is the Society of the Elect? What is the Roundtable Group/Cliveden Set and the Golden Triangle? What are the CFR and RIIA? Since 1900, what has every war been about? Natural Resources, especially oil? Does HSBC, Bank of America, Citibank, JP Morgan, Oppenheimer, Rothschilds/Schiff, BCCI, the Vatican Bank, and the Bank of England have any connections? Why do the Saudis get along swimmingly with Israel? Who were the Zionists, the Domneh, and the Sephardi Jews? You have way more than you know.
    1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. When the public realizes that the progressive neos, on both sides, are the same old corrupt crony capitalists of yore, (ye auld Federalists raising their ugly heads again), which have been spoken of for years, then they will "get the picture." Crony capitalism, expansionism, imperialism, and the caste system at its best. The public is unaware of how complicit the Roosevelts and Astors were with Britain, and the aristocracy, especially about US involvement in WWII. Then, there was the intermarrying of the British aristocrat's daughters to wealthy US robber barons. This association goes back even farther, to the 1890s, with Rhodes and the Roosevelts, and those in bed with the crown. The Federalists are why Jefferson created the Republican Party, earlier, in the first place. Socialism is appealing to the Federalists, as its all about a big brother government, and control. Through law, they removed themselves out of the tax system, with scams such as foundations, etc. During the Congress of Vienna , in 1814-15, the aristocrats of Prussia, Russia, and Austria swore to stomp out Republicanism one day, though it's claimed that Britain didn't agree at that time. Of course, Britain was also in the middle of signing the Treaty of Ghent (Dec. 1814) at the same time, stopping the War of 1812. Out of all the so-called free and democratic nations of the west, which nation has nationalized the most corporations? Britain? What about the US? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nationalizations_by_country
    1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. Back around 2000, it was known that self-proclaimed communists joined forces with the neo-nazis and environmentalists. Trump exposed them on the Today Show. They not only infiltrated, but took control of, the Reform Pary. This is the same party that Perot founded, but refused to run under it again. However, Trump was asked to run under it, some say, by Gov. Ventura. He quickly left after the California vote. "Trump considered himself a conservative, but criticized Pat Buchanan, saying: 'I'm on the conservative side, but Buchanan is Attila the Hun.' He withdrew from the race citing the party's infighting, as did Jesse Ventura and the Minnesota Reform Party. Donald Trump stated: 'So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.'" "Pat Buchanan decided to leave the Republican Party because: 'The Republican Party at the national level has ceased to be my party. This divorce began around the end of the Cold War when President (George H W) Bush declared it to be a New World-order party and began intervening all over the world. While he and I were allies and friends during the Cold War, I just felt that once the Cold War was over the United States should return to a more traditional non-intervention foreign policy.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America President Trump has never supported the NWO (UN-G20- China cabal), and he is nowhere as far-right as Buchanan. Buchanan is from within Bush and McCain's lot, and he rejoined the GOP. This is the very lot, which also joined forces with the radical left, inside the CFR, that are behind the election interference today. They've also done their best to unseat a sitting president. They are the liberal universalists or liberal internationalists; the nation topplers and builders, who spread "international capitalism" in the guise of "democracy." It was GHW Bush that signed the US up for the global warming agenda at Rio in 1992, (Rio+20, Agenda 21), and helped grease the wheels for China to join the WTO, which Clinton continued. Every president, except Trump, was involved in this since Nixon. The real history, leading to today, going back to 1945: Prof. John J. Mearsheimer, Univ. of Chicago, (2019), "Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order": https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/isec_a_00342 Mearsheimer explains what is to come, and it is coming. There is no stopping it. Also, see Pompeo at Brussels: Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTr4cO8LXGA
    1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. diatonicjon: In the US, it all started over Federal Banking. Everybody was Democratic Republicans at the time. However, the Federalists, (e.g. Hamilton et al), who wanted big government, also wanted a non-regulated National Bank, besides the Wall Street and state banks. These National banks failed, until the last National Bank's charter was stopped by Andrew Jackson in 1832. That was the divide that actually separated the people who became Republicans from the Democrats. Jackson and the Democrats didn't want any banking, especially federal banking, but the industrialized north wanted banking, as it required capital to grow. The south was plantation farming, which used slaves as the workforce, instead of machinery. After the plantations were built, and paid off, they were pretty much self sufficient. In America, slave owners allowed the slaves to reproduce, and they enslaved the children, so they had a replenishable workforce. Outside the US, the British colonies, in the Caribbean, kept buying slaves, when others died off. Anyhow, that started the split, and the flames were fanned by European investors in the National Bank. Within thirty years time, 1832 to 1861, Civil War broke out over it. The British slave laws coincided with stopping the bank. They used slavery as a wedge issue. You will hear people claim that the British banned all slavery then. No, they didn't. They banned it everywhere except for the East India Company in Asia. Before this, they had banned the slave trade, but still used slaves in their colonies. You'll also hear that the Civil War was over slavery. No, it wasn't. Read Lincoln;s inauguration speech. He told the southerners that he would not ban slavery. What started the war, was the southern states secession, before Lincoln was sworn in, and those states confiscating federal property, mainly forts and armories. It was taking back a fort, where the first shot started the whole war. Anyhow, the Brits and the French had the idea to fan the flames of war, and they sent troops to both Canada and Mexico, waiting for us to kill each other off, in order to invade the US, and take it back. It didn't work, as Lincoln took over the printing of our money, and told the Wall Street banks to go jump off a cliff. They had asked as high as around 35% interest to finance the war for Lincoln. They pulled the same thing with the south. They printed their own money too. Ending slavery came later, after the war started. All the banking, then, was state banks, or private. There was no federal bank, one with government involvement. That is why the Democrats like socialism, as it is akin to feudalism and the plantation ideology. That is also why Republicans are capitalists, and are pro-banking, as industry, big business, and free trade can't flourish without it. Industry is based on capital, and when a business needs to expand, or build new plants, banks are required. The differences between Republicans and Federalists, are the need for some banking regulation, and a smaller and leaner federal government. Bigger government means more regulation. WWII, however, ruined the US, with the military industrial complex. It hired so many, that it would collapse the economy if it were stopped. That is why the left and right back it. It is an unavoidable evil, but Trump is well versed on paring down on the cost. The left sees more spending, as hiring more, and the right sees it as being able to afford it. To support the war industry, the US agreed to be Europe's bully on the block. To be in NATO, they have to buy weapons from us.
    1
  2277. diatonicjon: To get an idea of the history about what happened, you'll have to look at the bank's history, British history, and US history, starting as far back as Hamilton and the Federalists. Then, read both the south and north's histories, as they differ in opinion. However, to read about the split, you'll have to study Andrew Jackson, then the Whigs (Patriots), who became the Republicans, banks, tariffs and so on. It's a convoluted mess of one side fighting the other, with the Brits and Europeans fanning the flames, over Jackson's threats, and what he finally did with the National Bank charter. The Whig Party was formed, along with others, and they became the Republican Party under Lincoln. Whig, in the US, was a term they used for the old Patriots. You have to remember, that during that time, there weren't many years separating the Revolution, and Jackson's time in office. Jackson had served during Washington's last term, in the house and senate for Tennessee. The Brits still didn't accept the US as a sovereign nation, and they wanted it back. The left will claim that there was some kind of switch, between the parties in the sixties and seventies, but that isn't true, as I lived through that time. What had happened, was that trade unions began asking for too much in the north, so manufacturing started moving south. Northerners started moving south to find jobs, especially younger workers. That is what shifted the politics of the south, to carry the GOP in place of the Democrats who had held it. Nixon used what he called the southern strategy to get the votes, and it worked. It wasn't about people switching parties, except for the black population. The blacks switched over MLK, JJ, LF, and others telling them to, because of Johnson's welfare package. Before that, the GOP had the majority of the black population's votes, and the GOP was the reason why they even have civil rights laws, as the Democrats voted against them each time, in congress. Malcolm X was involved in it, until he saw what was really happening, and then tried to warn the black population. They murdered him for it. Funny, isn't it, that the GOP was the one who pushed through every civil rights bill, but when the people that those laws were protecting, were offered free money by the Democrats, they left the GOP in droves, only to become slaves on a plantation again. Slaves, dependent on their master, for their housing and welfare. That is how communism also works, the community collective, controlled by government, who owns the property and housing, but also pays them a paltry stipend to the collective. It's all about control, and the same thing as feudalism, or as Reagan wrote to Nixon, a "benevolent monarchy." Johnson used words that are too vulgar to use, when he bragged about what he had done.
    1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334.  @PWRR  Oh, how well I know. We're still in a battle between what's left of Jeffersonian Republicanism, which equates to freedom, and Hamiltonian Federalism, which equates to big brother government. I've always wondered where the leftists, in both parties, came up with "orange man." Orange was the color selected by the "Old Republicans" led by Rep. John Randolph of Roanoke, who split with Jefferson and Madison after they started to side more with the Federalists. Jackson was who Randolph supported, and he was the same president that 45 did as well. Randolph described Old Republican values as: “love of peace, hatred of offensive war, jealousy of the state governments toward the general government, a dread of standing armies, a loathing of public debts, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy of the patronage of the President.” I might not agree with everything Randolph believed, such as elitism, but the words in that quotation, I do believe in. Of course, many that came from Britain (Virginias' First Families) were elitists during that time. There's a good book on this, titled: The Roots of American Communism, by Draper. It explains what occurred, going back to the many German emigrants that flooded in during the 1800s. There are many others as well, which tell of Leon Trotsky, the Christian Socialists, their collegiate ties, the Rand School of Social Science, and how the infection began. The history of the "bad bishop" William Montgomery Brown is very telling.
    1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. That is the big difference between the two parties. The DNC selects who they want, regardless of the primary vote, while the Rs follow the vote. The first is "undemocratic," and the second is democratic. The Ds, going back to Boss Tweed, have been guilty of this for a very long time. Saying this, the D Party, especially after 1945, had to do this to keep out the radicals that have been with them since the Democrat Clubs, (consisting of the French and Germans), which formed under Washington. The Ds, though, have been socialists from day one. It's one of the reasons why the Rs left the D-R Party by 1829, and it's the biggest one. Jefferson's political ideology never did fully mesh with that of Madison and Monroe, as the latter two were close with the French radicals. . What I have been told of the R Party, is that they control the top membership, to keep out the radicals, before they can throw their hat in the ring. NGOs, such as the Hudson Institute, which recommends R policy, comes into play here. The institute's roots go back to Ike and "two agencies," but they also supported three "progressive" candidates (Nixon, and both Bushes), which has led us down a dark globalist road with wars and China. However, the R Party still adheres to the primary vote. . Trump, who, at one time, called himself a D, also became a reformer, and ran in 1999-2000 under Perot's Reform Party, which he quickly left, and outed. He ran as a reformer, again, but this time as an R, and he has kept his word. He left the D Party over the same reason as Reagan.
    1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. Yes, the "we wuz kangs" group. The fact is, Jesus was a learned Jewish rabbi, and that has been documented in early Jewish writing, as well as the Roman church agreeing with that. He was also of the Pharisees, which is mainstream Judaism, and was from the north, at Galilee, where the Zealots lived (who would knife you if you broke their law). That is what started his rebellion, the Zealots versus the Romans. ' The man called Jesus, today, was open minded, and brought back baptism, which goes back to washing one's hands before entering a temple. He supposedly discussed the more ancient esoteric beliefs, (Dead Sea Scrolls), which the Romans tried to destroy. The Jews even agree that baptism or washing/bathing was an old belief of theirs. . That being said, I have always been of the belief that the Jews are the people from Mesopotamia, and that they came from Babylon (there was no eighty years, or history before that), or around it. If so, they were most likely light skinned, because the ruling elite and priestly class from the north were. The statues and idols show the ruling elite as light skinned, black haired, and blue eyed from that area, (the dark-haired people). . Let's not forget the light skinned ruling elite in Egypt, shown on their own tombs, and in their temples. They also painted themselves with a reddish brown ocre type of body paint, and why this was done, nobody really knows. We also know that other elite in Egypt were Caucasian, with red hair in some instances, because their graves were explored. . Go back to the Kurgan hypothesis, which DNA supports, and it explains why. R1a and R1b. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurgan_hypothesis . That being said, if one reads the old literature on this, there were mixed races as far north as Russia and Ukraine, along the steppe and to the forks of the Volga, with the Eurasian nomads being akin to the American Indian, and described as dark. It was according to the tribe.
    1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. This is what has always been hidden, well, at least during Queen Victoria's reign until the sixties, with the wealthy power elite in the US and UK. The Anglo-American Establishment, which is made up of libertines, made good use of this blackmail racket, with the famous Stephen Ward case exposing it in the sixties. It's also tied to money laundering and offshore banking. JE and GM were just a newer iteration of that. I'll bet that someone has already replaced them. DC is debauchery on steroids, just like NYC and London are, and they're all linked. LBJ's Bobby Baker run the ring in DC at one time. "Baker frequently mixed politics with personal business. He was one of the initiators and the treasurer of the Quorum Club, located in the Carroll Arms Hotel adjacent to a Senate office building. The society was a place for lawmakers and other influential men to meet for food, drink, and ladies, away from the press that were constantly downstairs in the hotel lobby. Baker contends that, 'The Quorum Club, of all the things I was involved in, it is the most insignificant thing. It was located in the Carroll Arms Hotel. When they first put it together, they asked me to get attorney Ernie Tucker to draw up the papers, which he did. The Quorum Club was a place where a guy wanted to get away, you know, from being at the bar downstairs at the Carroll Arms, where there were too many reporters or too many gawkers. It was an easy place for a lobbyist to get together with a Senator, or a Senator's girlfriend. ... I was very close to all the administrative assistants and legislative assistants. I would say 90% were like me. [We] All had girlfriends. And the Quorum Club was a place that you could be met there and nobody would know about it.'"
    1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. The people that had his documentary banned, are the same insane and wealthy power elite, which like to travel around the world, staying in private island villas at five-star spa resorts, around the Caribbean, Seychelles, Maldives, or French Polynesia. They brag these places up as being environmentally friendly, which cost $950+ a night, even though they put them on a small island on an coral atoll, which once had no humans on them. Thus, they disrupted nature instead of helping it. If they're wealthy enough, they buy their own island. You should hear what some of them have said about the natives, and about where they live ("not very photogenic," etc), especially on the isles that are residential, which have the airports. It was nothing good, yet the islanders are the very people that give them their five star treatment. Imagine the spa workers meeting Madonna, Clinton, or Epstein. Didn't you ever wonder what Epstein had planned for the two islands he purchased? These are the power elite's retreats and spas. It's where they run so they don't have to associate with the working class. The Buffetts and Gates of the world, flock to them to hobnob with the politicos. "What happens on the island, stays on the island." Some of the most notorious resorts, though, are in places like Thailand. Imagine walking in the lobby, and the first thing you see are young teens running about, who work there. Remember the massage tables? Stephen Ward and Jeffery Epstein. How much carbon fuel does their planes and yachts burn, to travel to these places?
    1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1