Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Haggard Shillary Clinton Worries Bitcoin will Destabilize the US Dollar" video.

This fiat currency problem has been building since the Civil War.
16
@ianbutler1983 Funny, don't you think, that they despised 45, who idolized Andrew Jackson, the president that nailed the national bank, and was the only one to pay off the national debt?
8
@NwoDispatcher The same way they always have, credit, and borrowing from the Fed, which is owned by a handful of large banks, or from the World Bank, etc. All of that is connected. They have a new ideology now, that fiat currency is unlimited, and it's been known for some time that several banks have been lending out more than ten times their reserves, which is the process of fractional reserve lending. When they crash, they run to the Fed, who just creates more money out of thin air, supposedly by selling bonds, and all of that is paid off via taxation, which devalues the dollar, and creates inflation. Many future generations are now on the hook. Look for the paper bill to die, and a possible change in the US Constitution, which will end coinage. They want everything digital, so if a loaf of bread becomes $1000, it's merely digits on a card or your iPhone.
4
There was a reason why HRC and her lot extolled the play, Hamilton.
4
That occurred several years back, when the Govt quit printing checks. They required everyone to have a bank account, or a debit card. There is no real difference between a check, and a bank note. Both are just numbers in a ledger.
4
@REALCaptainAmerican Let me add that we obtained the idea of financing wars, and nationalist or federalist expansionism via credit, from the British during Hamilton. That was how the British worked, and how they became the large empire that they did, with low interest loans from the City of London's banks. Borrow and tax.
3
@REALCaptainAmerican Looks like they deleted my first post to you about greenbacks, where I followed fiat currency back to the revolution, War of 1812, and the Civil War, etc. Funny why they did that, when there was nothing in it but direct quotes. You're right about the thirties, and then again in 1964 with the silver certificates.
3
@candyflair7946 No, because with digital, they can control you. It's already began with the IRS monitoring transactions over $600. They can't do that with paper currency, which can be held outside the bank.
3
@chuckhoyle1211 That's it, and they'll blame transnational crime for the change. In reality, it's to control anyone who might buck the system.
2
In reality, it is the beginning of the Nationalist's (Federalist's) attack on the digital currencies, which the government wants to replace with their own.
1