Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "The Young Turks"
channel.
-
LMAO! It is no worse than Joe Kennedy, who was the father of JFK, and in the Irish Mob, who made his fortune from bootlegged whisky. You do construction in New York, you deal with the mob. You own a gambling casino, you do business with the mob. Do you actually think, that the people do not know, that all the presidents have had mob connections? Look at LBJ, Nixon, and the Bushes. Regan was involved with the Jewish mob in Hollywood and New York. I'll bet Carter worked with the mob, too, and let us not leave out the Clinton Ties. What of Obama and his ties to the Chicago mob, or worse, the Muslim Brotherhood? What about the Black Panthers?
7
-
6
-
'The NRA is a mouthpiece for the gun manufacturing industry'.
If so, then the TYT is a mouthpiece for communism. I had two firearms, hanging on the wall, when I was twelve years old, so what is your point? You have a problem with a child, who has been trained to use a firearm responsibly, and hunt with his father? I would have taken that firearm, during a home break-in, and defended my parents, too. There is no excuse for your ignorance, being anti-Constitutional, and being anti-American. If you do not like the US, Turks, then feel free to leave it.
5
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
It is not crazy lunatics reading the bible, it is crazy pastors that preach hate and bigotry to the congregations, such as the Born-Again Pentecostals, that are the cause of it. Examples are those like Rick Joyner, Ted Haggard, Mike Hoggard, Bill Schnoebelen, Pat Robertson, John Ankerberg, and the list goes on. They preach lies, hate, bigotry, and quote scripture out of context, where the other lunatics listen to it, until someone acts on it, like this guy did. Rick Joyner and the Dominionists are even guilty of preaching sedition and treason against the US Government.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
For these uneducated creationists to even believe in Noah, astounds me, when the truth is on the internet. The tale of Noah is the rewritten Jewish version of the tale of Atrahasis, which is different in the amount of days it lasted, and how bad the flood was. Atrahasis is the original Sumerian tale of a seven day flood, when the Arabian Sea spilled through the straight of Hormuz, some 14,000 years ago, flooding the lowland that is now the Persian Gulf. It flooded in similar places, slowly, over the years (about 5500, stopping around 8,500 BP) during that time, over rapid sea level rise, from the icecap melting. One example is that Florida was about twice its size, 14,000 years ago. There were no Dinosaurs around 14,000 years ago.
Look who started this movement, Kent Hovind, the tax dodger, (who was dumb enough to believe in the straw man tax dodge), and received his so-called PhD from a double-wide trailer in Colorado. I hear that his son is still preaching this slush. Dumb and dumber.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Rusty Clifford
What they'll try to argue is that 1100 is a huge number. However, that is a very small, actually minute, percentile of the total children in the US, who could use a gun, and are residing in homes with guns. We're speaking of 1100 out of hundreds of millions. On top of that, it is the parents fault, in those cases, for leaving a gun accessible to small children. These lefties remind me of the tinfoil hat wearing, nutter conspiracy theorists and hoaxers, who try to quote words and numbers out of context, and use them as scare tactics. When you check their sources, you find they're lying through their teeth, when compared to reliable data.
They are no better than the neo-Nazi anti-Semites, who spread lies about the Jews. They remind me of Hal Hunt, from the 1960s, and Robert Welch's John Birch Society, who claimed many fallacies about both FDR and Truman. They're Goebbels propagandists, trying to push their low percentile opinions on the greater masses.
The FBI's statistics clearly show, that not only has small children who harmed others, with guns, continually dropped over the last twenty years, but that violent crime, especially home intrusions, have dropped as gun ownership has risen during that time. That clearly shows that the lefties are telling one bare faced lie after another. Yet, you get those, like this Ana and her henchmen, who sit there, smugly, spieling one fallacy after another. The idiots who believe them, are either to lazy to look up the truth for themselves, or they are liars too.
2
-
2
-
Funny that, when nobodies ever found Noah's Ark. In truth, the ark was probably just a small boat or raft, capable of holding Atrahasis' family, and a little of their livestock, which grew in proportion in its tale. There was a flood, at about 14,000 BP, when the Arabian Sea spilled through the Straight of Hormuz, and flooded the lowlands that is now the Persian Gulf. However, the Gulf took about 5,500 years to obtain the size that it now is. The inrush of water took about seven days, according to the original flood story.
I would say that news made it to someone, that the Sea was getting high enough, that it would spill over into the lowlands, and someone did build a raft or boat, or already had one, for themselves, and a tale was created from that, in ancient Sumeria, where it is recorded at its earliest. There is no such a person as Noah, which was concocted by the Jews. However, Atrahasis, (the original character), is also called two other names, in differing accounts of the same story, just not the Jewish 40 days version with Noah. The Jews loved to highly embellish their stories, and rename ancient people, with their Jewish hero's names. They did it with Moses too.
2
-
2
-
I find that funny, that you find the 2nd amendment interpretation wrong, when this has been settled by the Supreme Court, many times, by those with more education on the subject than you, and it also seems that you have never read factual US history, about why the term, militia, does not mean the army, but does define the citizens of the United States; every legal citizen.
Both had the right to carry those guns, period. However, BAIR might be in trouble for breaking the bigotry and hate crime laws of the US, and they might be arrested and tried over it, if their identities are verified. They wore those masks for a reason, as they knew they were openly breaking this law.
"Defined in the 1999 National Crime Victim Survey, "A hate crime is a criminal offense. In the United States, federal prosecution is possible for hate crimes committed on the basis of a person's race, religion, or nation origin when engaging in a federally protected activity." In 2009, the Matthew Shepard Act added actual or perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability to the federal definition, >>and dropped the prerequisite that the victim be engaging in a federally protected activity.<<
Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have statutes criminalizing various types of hate crimes. Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia have statutes creating a civil cause of action in addition to the criminal penalty for similar acts. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia have statutes requiring the state to collect hate crime statistics".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There are no haters to it, since she was not a deceased president. They put her on a $20, and I will do my best not to use it, letting it flounder like the $2. I'll accept Obama, after he is deceased, on a bill, as he is a president, but I'll be damned if I'll accept US currency that does not have a deceased president on it, over some mealy mouth pastor wanting her on the $2, or a dumb president crying bigotry with every breath. They've put her on postage stamps enough, that they might as well just make them continuously; isn't that enough?
Carson shows his ignorance, when he said that Jefferson was a secretary, before he gets a hint that he was a president, but a least he is smarter than Obama, as nobody uses the $2.
1
-
1
-
First, what happened to the other two girls in the Photo, as they're just as guilty?
Second, when she went into the sorority, she would have been made aware of what the rules and bylaws are. She would have known that if she broke them, and was caught, then she could be kicked out. She knew all that going in, including their dress code. All other sororities and fraternities are the same way, both Social Collegiate and or Gentlemen/Ladies. If she wanted to do as she pleased, then she should not have pledged that sorority, or pledged another, (if selected), which had less stringent rules. There are generally several of each, sorority and fraternity, around every college campus.
1
-
1
-
Well, one can tell that Clinton is a far leftie, and two, she is a lying tort attorney. First, you can not sue a gun manufacturer, for someone being killed by a gun. If you do, will you sue every automobile manufacturer, because someone was killed in a car wreck? Even though it was the driver of the other cars fault? That is her harebrained logic, to sue the car maker. That is not the only example, and the others are too numerous to mention. The gun did not kill the person, the shooter did, and in the automobile's case, the driver causing the collision did. Her anti-gun views are why many democrats have went to the republican party, and why Sanders is gaining ground on her. Hopefully, he will get the nomination.
Clinton is corrupt, and was caught at it, several times, so she is not to be believed. I watched on, as Bill ran his first time, and read or listened to what she was involved in during the election. Since then, her corruption has became much worse. I voted for Bill, but I would never cast a vote for her. Both parties are being controlled from their far wings, the imbeciles and the fanatical zealots.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jason G
The legality is that they arrested and searched the man, after finding out he had a warrant on him, not before. If the LEO had searched him before finding the warrant, it would have been thrown out.
Law Enforcement has always questioned suspects, without making an arrest, even without ones rights being read, as what is said is inadmissible in court, but they can still ask one questions. In my opinion, the officer had cause to question him, because he came out of a house, that had been reported earlier, as having illegal drug activity taking place inside, and the officer was on a stakeout of that home. He didn't arrest or search Strieff, until it was found that he had a warrant by running his name. A name and ID that Strieff willingly gave the LEO. He would have walked, had he not had a warrant out on him, and he could have refused to give the LEO an answer. Utah agreed that it would have been illegal to arrest the man for just stopping him for questioning.
Strieff's attorney asked the court to suppress the narcotics evidence found, after they made an arrest on the outstanding warrant, and then did a search, not before. Strieff's attorney cited Terry v. Ohio, but in that case, a Cleveland LEO frisked a man, and found a gun, without making an arrest on an outstanding warrant, and just because he looked suspicious. Thus, it was against his 4th amendment rights. The two cases are totally different.
NY Times:
"The case, Utah v. Strieff, started when the police in Salt Lake City got an anonymous tip of drug activity at a house. An officer monitoring the house became suspicious at the number of people he saw entering and leaving. When one of those people, Edward Strieff, left to walk to a nearby convenience store, the officer stopped him and asked for his identification. A routine check revealed that Mr. Strieff had an outstanding “small traffic warrant.” The officer arrested him based on that earlier warrant, searched him and found drugs in his pockets.
The State of Utah agreed that the initial stop was illegal, because it was not based on reasonable, individual suspicion that Mr. Strieff was doing anything wrong. Instead, the state argued that the discovery of the valid warrant — after the illegal stop — got around the Fourth amendment violation."
Here, the media is quoting Justice Sotomayor's opinions, and not that of all the Justices. She wished to throw out everything, because a LEO stopped the man to question him, even though he was arrested and searched over finding an outstanding warrant. The LEO had no intention of arresting the man over the stop, until he saw that there was a warrant against the man. If he had arrested the man, just over the stop, it would have been illegal.
Decision:
"Holding: When there was no flagrant police misconduct and a police officer discovered a valid, pre-existing, and untainted warrant for an individual’s arrest, evidence seized pursuant to that arrest is admissible even when the police officer’s stop of the individual was unconstitutional, because the discovery of the warrant attenuated the connection between the stop and the evidence."
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/utah-v-strieff/
http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/argument-preview-utah-v-strieff-and-the-future-of-the-exclusionary-rule/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/opinion/another-hit-to-the-fourth-amendment.html
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jennifer Loftus
The oldest recorded flood tale, that of the Sumerians, say that it was only the Euphrates river that flooded, and that many people were drowned in the lowlands, over a 7 day rain. That Sumerian tale grew in size, twice more, to where it claimed an ark was built, that landed on a mountain in Mesopotamia, and not on Ararat, as the Jews claimed. The second tale of the three Mesopotamian tales, said that the boat landed on a small hill. With each retelling, it got embellished that much more, until the Jews really polished it up for a fourth retelling, claiming it rained 40 days and the water covered the earth, with Noah landing on Ararat.
I imagine, with the rapid sea level rise over those years, when the icecap melted, that there was bad weather and flooding everywhere. Florida is 1/2 the size it once was, and Cuba and Haiti was connected into one island. The sea level rose about 350 feet over those years, with the rise starting at about 14,000 BCE, which leveled off around 8500 BCE. Tales of severe flooding, during that time, are from all over the world, as you state.
In the Mesopotamian tales, the flood is said to either be the Euphrates river flooding, or it is guessed that it was when the Persian Gulf was created.
If a Rabbi will state the truth, and some do, they will tell you that the Torah is all metaphorical. There's a lot of metaphor in the entire Tanakh. They combined many different tales of many different Gods into one, along with renaming heroes of other lands into Jewish names, and embellishing their tales. Noah and Moses were two examples.
The link below is to a chart of the sea level rise.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png
1
-
There's enough Marxist-Leninist radicals in the comments below, along with paid DNC and Soros shills, that it is actually hilarious to see all the inane lies and deceit that they'll post about Trump, especially when those e-mails prove them wrong. I especially love all these bedlamite women's comments, who claim that the sun shines from Marxist Hillary's rump. Brainwashed much? I can tell you that Christians do not see Trump as your lies paint him. Oh, that's right, you Marxists are not religious are you?
I do wonder if you have ever heard of Hillary Clinton's idol, the Marxist-Leninist radical and revolutionary, Saul Alinsky, who she even wrote her senior dissertation about, with his help, and who she stayed in contact with until the red bastard died. I wonder if you even know about the Marxist Cloward-Piven Strategy, which the DNC has been pushing since the 1960s? The same one that Obama and Hillary are pushing now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It seems that he's showing his far left commie colors, and it also shows, how fools elect anti-gun trash to office. I hope the bastard drops with a heart attack, over his filibuster, and Congress can get on with real business, instead of having to listen to a treasonous and seditious bastard, who is against the Americans right to defend themselves, and is pro-radical Islam. The gun didn't pull its own trigger, a bigoted fanatical religious nutter did. The very same radical Islamic Muslims, that the lefties have been allowing access to the US, which means that those deaths are their fault, not the gun. The guys parents were from the middle east, and supported radical Islam. Why not go after them and the Mosque where he was brainwashed at, which he learned the hate and bigotry from?
1
-
1