Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Is Most Published Research Wrong?" video.

  1. This is why the hard science departments, such as physics, engineering, and architecture, etc, laugh behind the backs of the soft science professors such as those in sociology, anthropology, Egyptology, and archeology, who have only very limited proof of anything, and provide only speculative theory. There are many scientific papers that show the claims about Darwinism to be false, actually as many false as true. Their claims about ancient architecture and the building of the pyramids, etc, produce some of the biggest laughs in hard science. Sociology refuses to veer away from their Darwinian paradigm, even when proven false, and the mounting evidence that proves their ignorance is discarded as anomalies. Two studies were released, which show that anthropology's claim that man originated from Chimpanzees, (which they claim have 99% identical DNA to humans), is false, when you add in the faults that they leave out. The real percentage of like DNA is around 93-95%, which is a very huge difference. Other studies prove that their claim of our chromosome number being different over it breaking and rejoining is false. It was a telomere to telomere fusion, which means that a piece of broken DNA, (broken in the middle), and magically reattaching itself is an impossibility. Another DNA study shows that the DNA clock dating method is highly inaccurate, just as is radiocarbon (C-14) dating of anything over 20.000 years. You will never hear about this, unless you do some digging to find it, but it is there. A new study shows that the land bridge theory, which shows people migrating across the Bering Strait, could not have happened as claimed. It shows that no human could have survived the trip over the ice, with the amount of ice that was known to exist. Another study shows that Cro-Magnon man has been around much longer than claimed, and it showed that they had cross bred with the Neanderthal in Europe, way before they claim. The cross breeding was not Neanderthal to Cro-Magnon but vice versa. Last, the elongated skull people of Peru, who had the two skull plates, have DNA that lead back to the Middle-East and Europe. They now have evidence that they were born with larger brains and elongated skulls, as a seven month stillborn child was found mummified, with an elongated skull, in Bolivia, just across the Peruvian border at Lake Titicaca. I think another was also unearthed. You will not hear of this from the anthropologists.
    1