Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "" video.
-
There is a reason that the nation state exists, as there are too many ethnicities and cultures, which do not mix well. Some people would rather live in one area over another, with a different culture, and law, as well as being able to flee a nation when it becomes unbearable, if possible, to another.
Having said this, there are some true dandies, in the literal sense, within the so-called elite class, especially within university and the foundations/NGOs, that not only want to force the same culture, which they've created, upon everyone, but they are set upon destroying the nation states. They are the internationalists (political) and socialist progressives; both the same beast, really, and in several nations.
From the Wiki article on Internationalism (political):
"Supporters of internationalism are known as internationalists and generally believe that humans should unite across national, political, cultural, racial, or class boundaries to advance their common interests, or that governments should cooperate because their mutual long-term interests are of greater importance than their short-term disputes.
"Internationalism has several interpretations and meanings, but is usually characterized by opposition to nationalism and isolationism; support for international institutions, such as the United Nations; and a cosmopolitan outlook that promotes and respects other cultures and customs."
Sovereign states vs. supranational powers balance
"In the strict meaning of the word, internationalism is still based on the existence of sovereign state. Its aims are to encourage multilateralism (world leadership not held by any single country) and create some formal and informal interdependence between countries, with some limited supranational powers given to international organisations controlled by those nations via intergovernmental treaties and institutions.
"The ideal of many internationalists, among them world citizens, is to go a step further towards democratic globalization by creating a world government. However, this idea is opposed and/or thwarted by other internationalists, who believe any world government body would be inherently too powerful to be trusted, or because they dislike the path taken by supranational entities such as the United Nations or a union of states such as the European Union and fear that a world government inclined towards fascism would emerge from the former. These internationalists are more likely to support a loose world federation in which most power resides with the national governments."
End Quote.
David Rockefeller bragged about being an internationalist, and stated that he was proud of it in his memoir. Henry Ford was of the same caliber, and thus, today, large foundations and NGOs, such as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the World Federalists, are behind what we are witnessing in the west, and they are heavily influenced by Russia and China. This is truthfully what is behind the curtain, at the World Economic Forum, in Switzerland.
5
-
There is a reason that the nation state exists, as there are too many ethnicities and cultures, which do not mix well. Some people would rather live in one area over an other, with different cultures, and laws, as well as being able to flee a nation when it becomes unbearable, if possible, to another.
Having said this, there are some true dandies within the so-called elite class, especially within university and the foundations, that not only want to force the same culture, which they've created, upon everyone, but they are set upon destroying the nation states. They are the internationalists (political) and socialist progressives; both the same beast, really, and in several nations.
From the Wiki article on Internationalism (political):
"Supporters of internationalism are known as internationalists and generally believe that humans should unite across national, political, cultural, racial, or class boundaries to advance their common interests, or that governments should cooperate because their mutual long-term interests are of greater importance than their short-term disputes.
"Internationalism has several interpretations and meanings, but is usually characterized by opposition to nationalism and isolationism; support for international institutions, such as the United Nations; and a cosmopolitan outlook that promotes and respects other cultures and customs."
Sovereign states vs. supranational powers balance
"In the strict meaning of the word, internationalism is still based on the existence of sovereign state. Its aims are to encourage multilateralism (world leadership not held by any single country) and create some formal and informal interdependence between countries, with some limited supranational powers given to international organisations controlled by those nations via intergovernmental treaties and institutions.
"The ideal of many internationalists, among them world citizens, is to go a step further towards democratic globalization by creating a world government. However, this idea is opposed and/or thwarted by other internationalists, who believe any world government body would be inherently too powerful to be trusted, or because they dislike the path taken by supranational entities such as the United Nations or a union of states such as the European Union and fear that a world government inclined towards fascism would emerge from the former. These internationalists are more likely to support a loose world federation in which most power resides with the national governments."
End Quote.
David Rockefeller bragged about being an internationalist, and stated that he was proud of it in his memoir. Henry Ford was of the same caliber, and thus, today, large foundations and NGOs, such as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the World Federalists, are behind what we are witnessing in the west, and they are heavily influenced by Russia and China. This is truthfully what is behind the curtain, at the World Economic Forum, in Switzerland.
2
-
2