Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Black people and conspiracy theories" video.

  1. Simon, many of the fallacies have been spread from the church pulpit concerning this in the US, as the group in mention has a stronger religious conviction than do white people in the US. The NOI is one example, and there are certain celebrity pastors guilty of spreading it as well. However, this is becoming better than it was, as their community has started to catch on. There are many whites in the US that end up falling for certain theories as well. As an example, during and after the 2016 election, many were following a certain anon on 8chan, and if one carefully read what this person had to say, you could tell it was a psyop from the D Party, and that it would help a certain female candidate. They even admitted it through two of their posts, which pointed toward her. The D Party, of course, tried to claim that it was from the opposite party, and if it was, it was from the neoconservatives who are leftists. The same goes for the group: Anonymous. Both appeared and were spreading propaganda during Pres. 44's term. This occurred as well with those that became the intolerant rioters, and they were educated, with some being professors. Many, I believe, have caught on that they were played here as well; especially after the election. The US Govt. is not one that I would trust to produce this type of research, as they began using the phrase "conspiracy theory," purposely, to discredit the public during the Warren Commission over the press and certain books that were quickly published. That came out in their own documentation, which was released later on after a congressional committee found that there was a conspiracy behind it in 1979, except they did not know who the others were, though they had several guesses. New documents, which were just released, show that the government's investigative agencies weren't sure even after the original Warren Commission report was released, where a few agencies kept the case open for several years afterward. The documents also stated that the Commission made a mistake in their conclusion. After I dug into why they did not want Pres. 45 in office, I found out that it had international involvement (G7) because he was against the idea of a transatlantic union (Federalism / Atlantic Union) from the start, which would also affect the UN and NATO. We could witness this in his actions after the fact, as well as the foreign involvement. He also renegotiated NAFTA and targeted China and the Paris Agreement. Several prominent think tanks have now published articles about how they hope to reverse course and bring the US back into the want of a transatlantic union.
    13
  2. As I commented to Simon, many of the fallacies have been spread from the church pulpit concerning this in the US, as the group in mention has a stronger religious conviction than do white people in the US. The NOI is one example, and there are certain celebrity pastors guilty of spreading it as well. However, this is becoming better than it was, as their community has started to catch on. There are many whites in the US that end up falling for certain theories as well. As an example, during and after the 2016 election, many were following a certain anon on 8chan, and if one carefully read what this person had to say, you could tell it was a psyop from the D Party, and that it would help a certain female candidate. They even admitted it through two of their posts, which pointed toward her. The D Party, of course, tried to claim that it was from the opposite party, and if it was, it was from the neoconservatives who are leftists. The same goes for the group: Anonymous. Both appeared and were spreading propaganda during Pres. 44's term. This occurred as well with those that became the intolerant rioters, and they were educated, with some being professors. Many, I believe, have caught on that they were played here as well; especially after the election. The US Govt. is not one that I would trust to produce this type of research, as they began using the phrase "conspiracy theory," purposely, to discredit the public during the Warren Commission over the press and certain books that were quickly published. That came out in their own documentation, which was released later on after a congressional committee found that there was a conspiracy behind it in 1979, except they did not know who the others were, though they had several guesses. New documents, which were just released, show that the government's investigative agencies weren't sure even after the original Warren Commission report was released, where a few agencies kept the case open for several years afterward. The documents also stated that the Commission made a mistake in their conclusion. After I dug into why they did not want Pres. 45 in office, I found out that it had international involvement (G7) because he was against the idea of a transatlantic union (Federalism / Atlantic Union) from the start, which would also affect the UN and NATO. We could witness this in his actions after the fact, as well as the foreign involvement. He also renegotiated NAFTA and targeted China and the Paris Agreement. Several prominent think tanks have now published articles about how they hope to reverse course and bring the US back into the want of a transatlantic union.
    3