Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "One effect of globalisation on Britain and the United States" video.

  1. According to the globalists, a change was needed after WWII to stop war. They laid all the wars, going back to the days of Europe venturing east, down to international trade, and imperialism. Of course, later on, the US joined the UK in that very trade; especially opium. After WWII, to stop another war, the globalists decided to force diversity and spread democracy. Democracy, at the end of a gun barrel, which seems imperialistic to me. That was Eisenhower's policy, which was kept classified for many years, and which the US and UK were following up through Obama. Eisenhower was a member of the so-called New Right, which opposed the Old Right led by Taft. The Old Right was anti-imperialist, and anti-interventionist, which was bad for business in the corporatist/globalist's eyes of the Anglo-American Establishment. Out of WWII came the United Nations, and the Atlantic Charter, which would be a supranational treaty organization to help the globalistic Internationalists and Atlanticists (corporate CEOs and politicos), and supposedly put a halt to war, though it created several, starting with Korea. Where communism was spreading, violence and war soon appeared. Now, one has to ask, when the Warsaw Pact went away, why did NATO stick around? Everything about the UN's globalist agenda has been openly published, going back to their first Earth Summit held during the Nixon Administration, when the G5 was also created.
    1