Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Did the Swinging Sixties do more harm than good?" video.

  1. How do you destabilize the west, and break up the old order? The sixties and seventies were the answer.
    71
  2.  @indigenouswayneuk8559  I can tell you a better one about what occurred under Carter. He hired a new CIA director, who was an admiral that he was in the navy with. Many said that the admiral was as nutty as squirrel poo. The director fired 600 of the best case officers, and department heads; crippling the agency. After this, they missed a certain mullah, hiding in France, and disregarded him gaining followers. Carter knew that the Shah had cancer, and tried to appease this mullah, allowing him to take control. Also, Carter trusted Brezhnev. Guess what this led to. Iran was lost, hostages, and Afghanistan. All of it tied to Russia.
    2
  3. There have always been two aspects to marriage, the religious, and legal. That led to a Supreme Court case in the US. The government sees it only as issuing a license for two to domicile these days, which is separate from the religious aspect. The license is important, as it is a contract between the two wed, which gives them legal rights in case of a split. That is also how the court ruled, since non-religious marriages have been carried out for many years by the JOPs, etc, instead of a minister.
    1
  4.  @sportsfix6975  About it.
    1
  5.  @nicholasmorrill4711  It leads back to the creation of the UN (the three allies during WWII, the US, UK, and Soviet Union). That was turned into a supranational organ at the end of the war, in 1945, after several nations signed the Atlantic Charter. The US, and several other nations, demanded things such as the UK to decolonize, etc, and liberalize to obtain money. The Marshall Plan was used as the hammer. Sadly, things have been pushed ahead, mainly designed within several US universities, such as at Georgetown, Columbia, and the University of Chicago, where progressive liberalism was pushed. Under Nixon, the economic plan was switched from Keynesian, to that of the Chicago School (Friedman, et al), and we've seen things such as the shock doctrine, and disaster capitalism come from it. Disaster capitalism is what we're witnessing now. Look for an article at The Intercept titled: Screen New Deal. It's very telling, and accurate.
    1
  6.  @nicholasmorrill4711  Did it occur to you that he might be incorrect sometimes? Look into these articles at Wikipedia, which are well sourced: Building Back Better: "This article is about the United Nations program. For the slogan used by the 46th President of the United States, see Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign. "Building Back Better (BBB) is a strategy aimed at reducing the risk to the people of nations and communities in the wake of future disasters and shocks. The BBB approach integrates disaster risk reduction measures into the restoration of physical infrastructure, social systems and shelter, and the revitalization of livelihoods, economies and the environment." Atlantic Charter  Look for the history of how FDR screwed Britain over. The plan originated from Wilson's Fourteen Points, (League of Nations), which was also forced upon Britain, in Paris, after WWI, delaying the treaty. The UN was formed from this in 1945, and Eisenhower based his policy upon it, which was kept classified for many years, which every president, up to Obama, and possibly Trump, followed. The new economics and direction, though, started with Nixon, and the UN Earth Summits, which were designed to hide what they were doing. Earth Summits [Starts in 1972, and is the beginning of Agenda 21] Earth Summit Agenda 21 Culture 21 Sustainable Development Goals [Agenda 2030] The Shock Doctrine "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is a 2007 book by the Canadian author and social activist Naomi Klein. In the book, Klein argues that neoliberal free market policies (as advocated by the economist Milton Friedman) have risen to prominence in some developed countries because of a deliberate strategy of 'shock therapy".'" While I might not agree with everything Mrs. Klein states, as she is a far-left apologist, she is correct about the corporate shenanigans, and the laws passed during disasters. She coined the term: disaster capitalism. The shock doctrine was used by the US, and its allies, in areas of interest, especially where Russia tried to expand their influence. For example, she states that Iraq was over bringing in the Patriot Act, when, in fact, it was about removing the Baath Party, which was tied to communism, and Russia. However, Congress used 9/11 to bring in the Patriot Act, which would have been unacceptable beforehand, and Halliburton made a fortune. Next, go to the UN website, and read the agendas. They are not only about trade and security, but about everything we're now seeing, which they call "sustainable development." This includes race and the "many lettered people," as well as the green movement. Right now, what she wrote in her Intercept article, is taking place in the US.
    1
  7.  @nicholasmorrill4711  And because you don't read, is why you will never understand history.
    1