Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. 2300
  2. 821
  3. 789
  4. 614
  5. 578
  6. 508
  7. 464
  8. 373
  9. 369
  10. 360
  11. 351
  12. 330
  13. 316
  14. 303
  15. 299
  16. 280
  17. 278
  18. 261
  19. 260
  20. 251
  21. 231
  22. 228
  23. 197
  24. 191
  25. 172
  26. 164
  27. 161
  28. 160
  29. 146
  30. 138
  31. 130
  32. 126
  33. 124
  34. 111
  35. 108
  36. 108
  37. 106
  38. 102
  39. 99
  40. 97
  41. 93
  42. 93
  43. 92
  44. 91
  45. 91
  46. 89
  47. 89
  48. 88
  49. 88
  50. 80
  51. 80
  52. 79
  53. 79
  54. 77
  55. 73
  56. 73
  57. 71
  58. 69
  59. 69
  60. 69
  61. 68
  62. 68
  63. 67
  64. 65
  65. 61
  66. 60
  67. 59
  68. 57
  69. 55
  70. 55
  71. 55
  72. 55
  73. 54
  74. 50
  75. 50
  76. 49
  77. 48
  78. 48
  79. 48
  80. 48
  81. 47
  82. 47
  83. 47
  84. 46
  85. 45
  86. 45
  87. 44
  88. 44
  89. 44
  90. 44
  91. 43
  92. 43
  93. 43
  94. 43
  95. 42
  96. 42
  97. 42
  98. 41
  99. 41
  100. 40
  101. 40
  102. 40
  103. 39
  104. 38
  105. 38
  106. 37
  107. 37
  108. 36
  109. 35
  110. 35
  111. 34
  112. 34
  113. 34
  114. 34
  115. 33
  116. 32
  117. 32
  118. 31
  119. 31
  120. 31
  121. 31
  122. 31
  123. 30
  124. 30
  125. 30
  126. 30
  127. 29
  128. 29
  129. 28
  130. 28
  131. 28
  132. 28
  133. 28
  134. 28
  135. 28
  136. 28
  137. 27
  138. 27
  139. 27
  140. 27
  141. 27
  142. 27
  143. 27
  144. 27
  145. 27
  146. 27
  147. 27
  148. 27
  149. 27
  150. 26
  151. 26
  152. 26
  153. 26
  154. 26
  155. In the end, Stone's prosecution, as well as everything else that we've witnessed, such as Flynn, the riots, and China over the past four years, leads back to one thing - money, and the amoral and immoral way that it was made at Wall Street, London, and within DC. The farther this president went to reverse the corruption, the harder a handful of the power elite tried to remove him, to stop it. If the "progressives" had their way, the US would no longer be a sovereign nation, and the corrupt would still be selling out the US to China, or to any other rogue nation that would pay them. We would have Wall Street running the government from a roundtable, much like the EU, but with the corrupted UN pulling the strings, while the public lost their natural rights, and every manufacturing job, that's left, would be heading to Asia. All the while, the largest financial scam in history, involving China, would have continued on, as well as perpetual war. . Mike Pompeo made an important speech to the Marshall Fund, at Brussels, where he pretty much told them that the gig was up, the nation-states would come back to rule, and that the corruption would end. It wasn't wishful thinking, it was solid fact. He told them that the "liberal international order" would change its ways, or it would be torn down, and another put in its place. The POTUS formed the D-10 not long back. What this president has done to reform the government, and the nation as a whole, is amazing. It's something that I never thought that I would witness. Fifty years of corruption, in both political parties, and backed by Wall Street and London, is hard to reverse. All of their wining and dining of Mao is being undone.
    26
  156. 25
  157. 25
  158. 25
  159. 25
  160. 25
  161. 24
  162. 24
  163. 24
  164. 24
  165. 24
  166. 24
  167. 24
  168. 23
  169. 23
  170. 23
  171. 23
  172. 23
  173. 23
  174. 22
  175. 22
  176. 22
  177. 22
  178. 22
  179. 21
  180. 21
  181. 21
  182. 21
  183. 21
  184. 21
  185. 21
  186. 21
  187. 20
  188. 20
  189. 20
  190. 20
  191. 20
  192. 20
  193. 20
  194. 20
  195. 20
  196. 19
  197. 19
  198. 19
  199. 19
  200. 19
  201. 19
  202. 19
  203. 18
  204. 18
  205. 18
  206. 18
  207. 18
  208. 17
  209. 17
  210. 17
  211. 17
  212. 17
  213. 17
  214. 17
  215. 17
  216. 17
  217. 17
  218. 17
  219. 17
  220. 16
  221. 16
  222. 16
  223. 16
  224. 16
  225. 16
  226. 16
  227. 16
  228. 16
  229. 16
  230. 16
  231. 16
  232. 16
  233. 16
  234. 16
  235. 16
  236. 16
  237. 15
  238. 15
  239. 15
  240. 15
  241. 15
  242. 15
  243. 15
  244. 15
  245. 15
  246. 15
  247. 15
  248. 15
  249. 15
  250. 15
  251. 15
  252. 15
  253. 14
  254. 14
  255. 14
  256. 14
  257. 14
  258. 14
  259. 14
  260. 14
  261. 14
  262. 14
  263. 14
  264. 14
  265. 14
  266. 14
  267. 14
  268. 14
  269. 14
  270. 14
  271. 13
  272. 13
  273. 13
  274. 13
  275. 13
  276. 13
  277. 13
  278. 13
  279. 13
  280. 13
  281. 13
  282. 13
  283. 13
  284. 13
  285. 13
  286. 13
  287. 13
  288. 13
  289. 13
  290. 12
  291. 12
  292. 12
  293. 12
  294. 12
  295. 12
  296. 12
  297. 12
  298. 12
  299. 12
  300. 12
  301. 12
  302. 12
  303. 12
  304. 12
  305. 12
  306. 12
  307. 12
  308. 12
  309. 12
  310. 12
  311. 12
  312. 12
  313. 12
  314. 11
  315. 11
  316. 11
  317. 11
  318. 11
  319. 11
  320. 11
  321. The DNC wants Obamacare to fail. Why? They want it as a single payer system, and that single payer is the US Government. That makes it socialized medicine, which is exactly what they're after. It is another step completed in the Cloward-Pevin Strategy, which the Marxist-Liberals have been pushing for since the 1960s. The rates rising and the insurance companies pulling out, are due to nobody working to pay into it. It is the same reason why Social Security is in the bad shape that it's in. Believe it or not, making people poor and high unemployment, are also a part of the Marxist's strategy. Here is the Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and [Marxist] political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"." Now, you know why the Communist Party USA backed Obama, Sanders, and Hillary Clinton. Take a look at their website, as they admit that they were backing both Sanders and Hillary for 2016.
    11
  322. 11
  323. 11
  324. 11
  325. 11
  326. 11
  327. 11
  328. 11
  329. 11
  330. 11
  331. 11
  332. Ironically, it was the same caliber of people behind the blaxploitation, who are funding and pushing BLM's movement along. Most BLM members are merely ignorant puppets, (or at least their main membership is, but not their leaders), of a giant destabilization plan being run by the wealthy socialist elite, and their wealthy comrades in the Anglo-American Establishment. These are the same caliber of people, who back in the fifties, recruited R. Williams to bring violence into the peaceful civil rights movement led by MLK, and they were mainly "progressives," or socialists/communists, that were behind it. All they know is hate and violence, just like labor union tactics. There have been so many myths created to cover for the wealthy elite class, and the Whig Party that was created during the last two years of Madison's term as president, which became the GOP, that it's pathetic. They're, in fact, Hamilton's old Federalists rebranded, who wanted a "big brother" and all-controlling government. They had already started dabbling in socialism by Lincoln's time, (with Lincoln, Greeley, and the Roosevelt family admiring and corresponding with Marx), where they left the beliefs of Jeffersonian Republicanism and the "Old Republicans" behind, over greed. They are the same caliber of people (the Neocons) that those who still believe in Jefferson's Old Republicanism have been trying to remove from the GOP. Sadly, many Republican voters are ignorant of this history. There was a reason that 45 admired Jackson, as he was the Old Republicans' favored president. Coincidently, the color that the Old Republicans had selected for their party was orange. By 1900, this was hidden within both political parties as "progressivism," which was nothing but Marxian socialism. The presidents that still upheld Old Republicanism between 1865 and 1900 were killed off, starting with Garfield, and then, McKinley. It had a lot to do with what happened to JFK and Bobby as well, later on. It's being done to sow hate and discontent between the people, and cause chaos much like Lenin and Trotsky caused in 1917 Russia. Trotskyism has much to do with what we're witnessing now, as it was wealthy New York socialists that had backed and financed Trotsky when he was residing in NYC before he left to meet Lenin at Saint Petersburg in Russia. That sewer swirls around Columbia U, and New York.
    11
  333. 11
  334. 11
  335. 11
  336. 11
  337. 10
  338. 10
  339. 10
  340. 10
  341. 10
  342. 10
  343. 10
  344. 10
  345. 10
  346. First, how do you know that all Christians think that Trump is an indecent man? Do you actually know how many people curse, drink, and swarp that attends church? I know a bunch of them, and when speaking of Catholics, sometimes you have to run a priest or bishop out of a bar. Don't come off holier than thou about Trump, as someone may look into your record. The tape was from eleven years ago, and people can change in a week. Trump apologized, so get over it. He even stated that he was ashamed of things that he had done in the past when he started running! Did you forget that too? Luke 6:37-42 37) Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven: 38) Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom. For with the same measure that ye mete withal it shall be measured to you again. 39) And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? shall they not both fall into the ditch? 40) The disciple is not above his master: but every one that is perfect shall be as his master. 41) And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye? 42) Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother's eye.
    10
  347. 10
  348. 10
  349. 10
  350. 10
  351. 10
  352. 10
  353. 10
  354. 10
  355. 10
  356. 10
  357. 10
  358. 10
  359. 10
  360. 10
  361. 10
  362. 10
  363. 10
  364. 9
  365. 9
  366. 9
  367. 9
  368. 9
  369. 9
  370. 9
  371. 9
  372. 9
  373. 9
  374. 9
  375. The Marxist New Left progressives are anti-religion, and have almost won. That was started by Hillary's Marxist idol, Saul Alinsky, long ago, and it was also put into the Cloward-Piven Strategy, since Alinsky taught Piven at the University of Chicago. It is step seven in their plan. Piven wrote about this strategy working, last year, in the left-wing The Nation magazine, where they originally published their takeover plan in 1966. https://www.thenation.com/article/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty/ The Marxist Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature, and The Nation magazine): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    9
  376. 9
  377. 9
  378. 9
  379. 9
  380. 9
  381. 9
  382. 9
  383. 9
  384. 9
  385. 9
  386. 9
  387. 9
  388. 9
  389. 9
  390. The left is not classically liberal, and they are far from it. John Locke, the father of liberalism, that of natural rights, was not against religion, and he was not for many of the things that the left proposes. Today's left is made up of Fabian socialists and hard left and right radical socialists, such as Communists and Fascists. The left sees US politics as a socialist government, with the hard left equalling communism, Fabian socialism in the middle, and fascism on the right. The problem is, that the left leaves out what the true Republican Party actually is, which supports classical liberalism, supports the Constitution, is for limited government, and is based on the early political parties of the founding of the nation. The left lies, by calling the Republicans fascists, because the GOP is next to anarchy on the true US political scale, which is that of a very limited government. The left owns fascism, a type of socialism, and they know it. The left is made up of all socialists, and they see the US as European in its form of government, with the political scale of; Communists (left)-Fabian Socialists (center)-Fascists (right). The true Republican Party has never represented that, is not on that scale, and it is the true classically liberal party. In reality, the true US political scale, is the socialists on left end of the scale, with anarchy at the right, and the Republican Party is just left of anarchy (no law at all). We are not a European socialist government and have never been, no matter how the left wishes we were, nor are the leftists liberal.
    9
  391. 9
  392. 9
  393. 9
  394. 9
  395. 8
  396. 8
  397. 8
  398. 8
  399. 8
  400. 8
  401. 8
  402. 8
  403. 8
  404. 8
  405. 8
  406. 8
  407. 8
  408. 8
  409. 8
  410. 8
  411. 8
  412. 8
  413. 8
  414. 8
  415. 8
  416. 8
  417. 8
  418. 8
  419. 8
  420. 8
  421. 8
  422. 8
  423. 8
  424. 8
  425. 8
  426. 8
  427. 8
  428. 8
  429. 8
  430. 8
  431. 8
  432. 8
  433. 8
  434. 8
  435. 8
  436. 7
  437. 7
  438. 7
  439. 7
  440. 7
  441. 7
  442. 7
  443. 7
  444. Yes, like we will listen to a Irish druggie, who doesn't know where he defalcated last. He must think that he knows it all, when it concerns US history and politics, but was raised in Ireland, and was strung out for most of that time. Next, we have the Hollywood celebrities (thespians), who are also druggies, that have been in and out of rehab, and most have lavender marriages (especially the ones in that ad). Don't know what a lavender marriage is? Look it up, and you will uncover the truth about Hollywood, and why thespians flock to Hollywood. Yet, they must think that we will listen to them? I would listen to a three year old over them. Because Duke publicly supported Trump, does not make Trump a racist, nor a member of the KKK. However, let us see who is supporting Hillary, Mrs. Warren. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    7
  445. 7
  446. 7
  447. Let's see what Colin Powell has stated about Hillary's e-mail scandal: "“Sad thing,” Powell wrote to one confidant, “HRC could have killed this two years ago by merely telling everyone honestly what she had done and not tie me to it.” “I told her staff three times not to try that gambit. I had to throw a mini tantrum at a Hampton’s [sic] party to get their attention. She keeps tripping into these ‘character’ minefields,” Powell lamented. He noted that he had tried to settle the matter by meeting with Clinton aide Cheryl Mills in August." "“They are going to dick up the legitimate and necessary use of emails with friggin record rules. I saw email more like a telephone than a cable machine,” Powell wrote last year to his business partner Jeffrey Leeds. “As long as the stuff is unclassified. I had a secure State.gov machine. Everything HRC touches she kind of screws up with hubris.” "Powell added in a tangential complaint: “I told you about the gig I lost at a University because she so overcharged them they came under heat and couldn’t [pay] any [sic] fees for awhile. I should send her a bill.”" and, “Dumb. She should have done a ‘Full Monty’ at the beginning,” Powell wrote. He added: “I warned her staff three times over the past two years not to try to connect it to me. I am not sure HRC even knew or understood what was going on in the basement.” https://theintercept.com/2016/09/13/colin-powell-emails/ Not only does Powell admit that Hillary screwed up everything that she touches, she trips into other characters, and that she is dumb and can not understand what is going on around her. Now, that is who the Democrats want as our new president.
    7
  448. 7
  449. 7
  450. My home state as well. Mitch fell in with the Neoconservatives of the New York Intellectuals, who are all Trotskyites. New York has been the bane of the US since the Declaration was signed, and it is the home of Federalism and Socialism in the US. Both Federalism and Socialism walk hand in hand, especially after the late nineteenth century. Its roots lie with Henry Clay's Whig Party, who were the old Federalists, and a few other left-wing groups, that came back after losing the Federalist Party. They've always supported a big brother government from the days of Hamilton. Greeley ran for president under the Whigs, and his NYC newspaper was famous for printing Marx's screeds. Lincoln was a pen pal of Marx as well, as the Whig Party became the GOP. This is what Rep. Randolph of Roanoke, the leader of the "Old Republicans," warned about. The Civil War was used to stomp out Old Republican thought and bring in Federalism, as well as the first ideas of Socialism, though many within the party, who still held Old Republican beliefs, tried to fight it. From that time, the Roosevelt family were big supporters, and by 1901, Teddy brought us Progressivism, which Wilson also followed, and with them came Socialism. Old Republican thought was mainly with the Democratic Party at the start of the Civil War, but the north sent in the Carpetbaggers to change that during reconstruction. They used thuggery and coercion to do it. They "Federalized" every state. It was being pushed by a few Protestant denominations as well, especially the Episcopalians, who had ties to the UK, and they were known as "Christian Socialists." Thus, it was within the elite Anglo-American Establishment. The main movement started in the 1890s in Boston (Church of the Carpenter and a few others) and moved to New York. There, they founded the Rand School of Social Science, where Trotsky was lecturing before he left to join Lenin, and it was also within Columbia U, where it was taught. By the 1930s, this same lot took in the Frankfurt School professors, and it was led by Dewey. This was the same Dewey that had traveled to Mexico to "prove Trotsky's innocence." The same Trotsky that was a communist. The grads became known as the New York Intellectuals, and they came into the GOP with the Rockefeller Republicans and Nixon to form the Neocons.
    7
  451. 7
  452. 7
  453. 7
  454. 7
  455. 7
  456. 7
  457. 7
  458. 7
  459. 7
  460. 7
  461. 7
  462. 7
  463. 7
  464. 7
  465. 7
  466. 7
  467. 7
  468. 7
  469. 7
  470. 7
  471. 7
  472. 7
  473. 7
  474. 7
  475. 7
  476. 7
  477. 7
  478. 7
  479. 7
  480. 7
  481. 7
  482. 7
  483. 6
  484. 6
  485. 6
  486. 6
  487. 6
  488. 6
  489. 6
  490. 6
  491. 6
  492. 6
  493. 6
  494. 6
  495. 6
  496. 6
  497. 6
  498. 6
  499. 6
  500. 6
  501. 6
  502. 6
  503. 6
  504. 6
  505. 6
  506. 6
  507. 6
  508. 6
  509. 6
  510. 6
  511. 6
  512. 6
  513. 6
  514. 6
  515. 6
  516. 6
  517. 6
  518. 6
  519. 6
  520. 6
  521. 6
  522. 6
  523. 6
  524. 6
  525. 6
  526. 6
  527. 6
  528. 6
  529. 6
  530. 6
  531. 6
  532. 6
  533. 6
  534. 6
  535. 6
  536. 6
  537. 6
  538. 6
  539. 6
  540. 6
  541. 6
  542. 6
  543. 6
  544. 6
  545. The Democrats accuse Trump and the GOP of Russia, when the Democrats are ran by Communists and Socialists themselves. Don't believe it? Read below. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." "We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization." "Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large “speaking” fees from Wall Street. But we know this already." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    5
  546. 5
  547. 5
  548. 5
  549. 5
  550. 5
  551. 5
  552. Elegant Centrist Why would you want to change the earth when we're now back to what is considered baseline normal temperature? Take a look at how much burnt carbon fuel it would take to double the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Many state that there's not enough left on earth. Since it takes doubling the amount to reach what some now estimate to only be a 1 deg C rise, then we are nowhere near what the left claimed would happen (6 deg C). Several in science, who will speak up about this, talk about the flawed "magic multiplier of three". The problem is, they used math based on feedback loops used in electronics to invent the math for this, instead of having the facts about feedback in nature, both positive and negative. There's more negative feedback in nature than positive. The earth is self-regulating, and has floated around +/- 1.5 deg C (+/- 2 to 3 deg F) at times since 8,000 BCE. Their stating that carbon is the sole cause is quite unprovable. Another tale I always hear from the left is, "the ice is melting, I've seen it". Well, of course it is, and has been since 14,000 years ago. There has been a very slow rise in the sea level ever since the ice cap leveled off from its quick melt starting about 8,000 BCE. The problem is, the global warming panic artists, like Gore and his lackeys, are using flawed science, and they ridicule anyone who states the facts about it. Gore wants that carbon tax. The only ones in science who are exposing it as flawed are retired professors, or those who are at the end of their tenure. Others are afraid of losing their tenure over it, or losing government funding.
    5
  553. 5
  554. 5
  555. 5
  556. 5
  557. 5
  558. 5
  559. 5
  560. 5
  561. 5
  562. 5
  563. 5
  564. 5
  565. 5
  566. 5
  567. 5
  568. 5
  569. 5
  570. 5
  571. 5
  572. 5
  573. 5
  574. 5
  575. 5
  576. 5
  577. 5
  578. 5
  579. 5
  580. 5
  581. 5
  582. 5
  583. 5
  584. 5
  585. 5
  586. 5
  587. 5
  588. 5
  589. 5
  590. 5
  591. 5
  592. 5
  593. 5
  594. 5
  595. 5
  596. 5
  597. 5
  598. 5
  599. 5
  600. 5
  601. 5
  602. 5
  603. 5
  604. 5
  605. 5
  606. 5
  607. 5
  608. 5
  609. 5
  610. 5
  611. 5
  612. 5
  613. 5
  614. 5
  615. 5
  616. 5
  617. 5
  618. 5
  619. 5
  620. 5
  621. 5
  622. 5
  623. 5
  624. 4
  625. 4
  626. 4
  627. 4
  628. 4
  629. 4
  630. 4
  631. 4
  632. 4
  633. 4
  634. 4
  635. 4
  636. 4
  637. 4
  638. 4
  639. Well, one thing is for certain, the leftists just lost the Cuban-American's vote. Their bragging up a Marxist dictator to the Cuban-Americans is like a slap to their face, and claiming that their horror stories are all a lie. Castro was so radical, that Khrushchev not only disliked him, but didn't trust him as far as he could throw him. What happened in Cuba was a switch from one despot tyrant to another. A story was told about one elderly Cuban who made it to the US, and saw his first supermarket, where he broke down and cried at all the food. When they led him outside, he stated that we Americans did know how lucky we had it, and when it was pointed out that the supermarket was not the only one in the area, the man broke down again. Stories about money being sent to relatives were many, and that money went to Castro, never to reach their relatives. In Cuba, if you hoarded food, they would imprison you, or worse. Yet, the leftist MSM try to brag up a tyrant? Of course they would, as Castro had their same Marxist ideology. You notice how the left are finally showing that they are Marxists, openly? The Marxists and the Communists started infiltrating the Democrats in the late 1940s and 1950s. They succeeded, and seated their first one into power, with Johnson in the White House. This is why the Communist Party USA has not ran their own candidate in some time, as they have been backing the DNC openly, since Obama. They have written about that on their own website. They openly backed Obama, Sanders, and Hillary.
    4
  640. 4
  641. 4
  642. 4
  643. 4
  644. 4
  645. 4
  646. 4
  647. 4
  648. 4
  649. 4
  650. 4
  651. 4
  652. 4
  653. 4
  654. 4
  655. 4
  656. 4
  657. 4
  658. 4
  659. 4
  660. 4
  661. 4
  662. 4
  663. 4
  664. 4
  665. 4
  666. 4
  667. 4
  668. 4
  669. 4
  670. 4
  671. 4
  672. 4
  673. 4
  674. 4
  675. 4
  676. 4
  677. 4
  678. 4
  679. 4
  680. 4
  681. 4
  682. 4
  683. 4
  684. 4
  685. 4
  686. 4
  687. 4
  688. 4
  689. 4
  690. 4
  691. 4
  692. 4
  693. 4
  694. 4
  695. 4
  696. 4
  697. 4
  698. 4
  699. 4
  700. 4
  701. 4
  702. 4
  703. 4
  704. 4
  705. 4
  706. 4
  707. 4
  708. 4
  709. 4
  710. 4
  711. 4
  712. 4
  713. 4
  714. 4
  715. 4
  716. 4
  717. 4
  718. 4
  719. 4
  720. 4
  721. 4
  722. 4
  723. 4
  724. 4
  725. 4
  726. 4
  727. 4
  728. 4
  729. 4
  730. 4
  731. 4
  732. 4
  733. 4
  734. 4
  735. 4
  736. 4
  737. 4
  738. 4
  739. 4
  740. 4
  741. 4
  742. 4
  743. 4
  744. 4
  745. 4
  746. 4
  747. 4
  748. 4
  749. 4
  750. 4
  751. 4
  752. 4
  753. 4
  754. 4
  755. 4
  756. 4
  757. 4
  758. 4
  759. 4
  760. 4
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. Hillary is a warhawk, and even the Communist Party USA, who support her, state that she is. From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." "We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization." [nominee meaning Sanders or Clinton] "Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large “speaking” fees from Wall Street. But we know this already." They know how she is, but they happily support her. That is who the Hillary supporters are voting for, a Communist radical. http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/ From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/
    3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. Will Px; Oh cry me a handful leftie, I'll call you a Communist if I want. I watched the DC Protesters, from DisruptJ20, who stated outright that they were Marxists, proud Communists, and one was waving a red flag with the hammer and sickle. Need I expose your lot more? How about Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward? Below is your party in a nut shell, and it has been since the 1960s. Communist Party USA (CPUSA) Democratic Socialists of America SDS Students for a Democratic Society (Founded by Aryeh Neier) ACLU Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism Socialist International (SI) Woods Fund of Chicago Chicago's school reform movement. (Ayers stated it was to teach revolutionary communism). University of Chicago Columbia University ACORN Planned Parenthood Open Society Institute (Ran by Aryeh Neier. Founded by George Soros) Human Rights Watch, aka Helsinki Watch (Founded by Aryeh Neier) Weather Underground (Weathermen) William Charles "Bill" Ayers (Weathermen) Bernardine Dohrn (Weathermen) Kathy Boudin (Weathermen) Now released and teaching at Columbia U. David Gilbert (Weathermen) Larry Grathwohl (Weathermen) Michael Klonsky (Weathermen) Susan Rosenberg (Weathermen) Linda Sue Evans (Weathermen) Saul Alinsky Frances Fox Piven Richard Cloward Aryeh Neier (Born in Berlin, Nazi Germany. Was hired by the ACLU 1963, became the executive director 1970) Carl Davidson Frank Marshall Davis George Soros aka GyĂśrgy Schwartz (Born in Nazi Budapest, Hungary. The President of his Open Society Institute is Aryeh Neier, one of the founders of the radical Students for a Democratic Society.).
    3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. LMAO! I saw this coming a long time ago. I knew that the DNC wanted Obamacare to fail, so they could pull this. It is all a part of the Marxist Cloward-Piven strategy, which is ongoing. Both Cloward and Piven, (Marxist-Communist activists), wrote another article, in the Marxist magazine, The Nation, last year, bragging about how their plan was succeeding, and how they were going to tax the rich. Hillary and Obama are Marxists to the bone. If you think not, read Cloward and Piven's spiel at the link below. https://www.thenation.com/article/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty/ What is the 1966 Marxist/Communist Cloward-Piven strategy, you may ask? The Marxist Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: "Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state." (From Alinsky's activist group, and The Nation's, printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and [Marxist] political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"."
    3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. The only state who mentioned that someone tried to hack into their voter data was Georgia, and it was the DHS who tried to do it! I do not care who you are, every hacker has to have an IP address, even if it is from a proxy server. If someone tries to hack an account, there will be an IP address associated with it. That does not mean that you can trace it back to its origin, because a real hacker will use a proxy server, which will block the hops back to the original source. Because of this, you can not prove who did it. If it was a kid in their parents basement, who didn't use a proxy, then yes, you could trace the hack to the source. It seems to me, that the CIA are lying through their teeth, and they hope the public are dumb enough to not know how the Internet works. Next, we get to the e-mails. Wikileaks has stated, several times, that it was a leak. A leak are files stolen by someone within, and sent to Wikileaks. Thus, someone didn't hack into anything, they had full access to the files, copied them, and sent them to Wikileaks, after they slipped them out of the building. It was an inside job, and a Russian hacker was not involved. From The Guardian: "Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.” "“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things." also, "The California Republican congressman Devin Nunes, chair of the House intelligence committee and a member of the Trump transition team, said: “I’ll be the first one to come out and point at Russia if there’s clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence – even now. There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it.”" https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/10/cia-concludes-russia-interfered-to-help-trump-win-election-report?CMP=share_btn_tw Craig Murray's blog article about it: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/ Then, we have the FBI, the NSA, and the Clapper stating that the CIA has nothing. Look into the history of the CIA's director.
    3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851. 3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. 3
  857. 3
  858. 3
  859. 3
  860. 3
  861. 3
  862. 3
  863. 3
  864. 3
  865. 3
  866. 3
  867. 3
  868. 3
  869. 3
  870. 3
  871. 3
  872. 3
  873. 3
  874. 3
  875. 3
  876. 3
  877. 3
  878. 3
  879. 3
  880. 3
  881. 3
  882. 3
  883. 3
  884. 3
  885. 3
  886. 3
  887. 3
  888. 3
  889. 3
  890. 3
  891. 3
  892. 3
  893. 3
  894. 3
  895. 3
  896. 3
  897. 3
  898. 3
  899. 3
  900. 3
  901. 3
  902. 3
  903. 3
  904. 3
  905. 3
  906. 3
  907. 3
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 3
  912. 3
  913. 3
  914. 3
  915. 3
  916. 3
  917. 3
  918. 3
  919. 3
  920. 3
  921. 3
  922. 3
  923. 3
  924. 3
  925. 3
  926. 3
  927. 3
  928. "Although there are genetic, behavioral and hormonal influences on body weight, obesity occurs when you take in more calories than you burn through exercise and normal daily activities. Your body stores these excess calories as fat. "Obesity can sometimes be traced to a medical cause, such as Prader-Willi syndrome, Cushing's syndrome, and other diseases and conditions."__Mayo Clinic ==== Obesity affects some groups more than others Read CDC National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) data brief "Hispanics (47.0%) and non-Hispanic blacks (46.8%) had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of obesity, followed by non-Hispanic whites (37.9%) and non-Hispanic Asians (12.7%). "The prevalence of obesity was 35.7% among young adults aged 20 to 39 years, 42.8% among middle-aged adults aged 40 to 59 years, and 41.0% among older adults aged 60 and older."__CDC & Do Genes Have a Role in Obesity? "In recent decades, obesity has reached epidemic proportions in populations whose environments promote physical inactivity and increased consumption of high-calorie foods. However, not all people living in such environments will become obese, nor will all obese people have the same body fat distribution or suffer the same health problems. These differences can be seen in groups of people with the same racial or ethnic background and even within families. Genetic changes in human populations occur too slowly to be responsible for the obesity epidemic. Nevertheless, the variation in how people respond to the same environment suggests that genes do play a role in the development of obesity." How Could Genes Influence Obesity? "Genes give the body instructions for responding to changes in its environment. Studies of resemblances and differences among family members, twins, and adoptees offer indirect scientific evidence that a sizable portion of the variation in weight among adults is due to genetic factors. Other studies have compared obese and non-obese people for variation in genes that could influence behaviors (such as a drive to overeat, or a tendency to be sedentary) or metabolism (such as a diminished capacity to use dietary fats as fuel, or an increased tendency to store body fat). These studies have identified variants in several genes that may contribute to obesity by increasing hunger and food intake. "Rarely, a clear pattern of inherited obesity within a family is caused by a specific variant of a single gene (monogenic obesity). Most obesity, however, probably results from complex interactions among multiple genes and environmental factors that remain poorly understood (multifactorial obesity). "Any explanation of the obesity epidemic has to consider both genetics and the environment. One explanation that is often cited is the mismatch between today’s environment and “energy-thrifty genes” that multiplied in the distant past, when food sources were unpredictable. In other words, according to the “thrifty genotype” hypothesis, the same genes that helped our ancestors survive occasional famines are now being challenged by environments in which food is plentiful year round. Other hypotheses have been proposed including a role for the gut microbiome as well as early life exposures associated with epigenetic changes."__CDC ==== There is no denying that genetics plays a role in a portion of the population, where the intake of food causes obesity in certain ethnic groups.
    3
  929. 3
  930. 3
  931. 3
  932. 3
  933. 3
  934. 3
  935. 3
  936. 3
  937. 3
  938. 3
  939. 3
  940. 3
  941. 3
  942. 3
  943. 3
  944. 3
  945. 3
  946. 3
  947. 3
  948. 3
  949. 3
  950. 3
  951. 3
  952. 3
  953. 3
  954. 3
  955. 3
  956. 3
  957. 3
  958. 3
  959. 3
  960. 3
  961. 3
  962. 3
  963. 3
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. Ken Tell another lie, as I have read the entirety. Firearms were for protecting the US from invasion, and to protect the people from a tyrannical government. “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”– Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788 “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…”– George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790 “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”– Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787 “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787 “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”– Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 ” The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent, (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of the press.”– Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”– Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.”– George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”– George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.”– Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.”– James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788 “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.”– James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789 “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms…  “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”– Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788 “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.”– Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778 “This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty…. The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.”– St. George Tucker, Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803 “The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance of power is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves.”– Thomas Paine, “Thoughts on Defensive War” in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775 I can continue with many more quotes. Your leftist views do not hold water, and leak like a sieve.
    2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. Hernan Visani My guess is, that they may try to lay it on Guccifer 2.0 (Marcel Lazăr Lehel), from Romania, and claim him to be a Russian spy, or some other nonsense. They caught him, and extradited him to the US, where he plead guilty, and claimed that he had hacked Hillary, and stated that it was very easy to gain access. However, the court could find no proof to his claim! They sentenced him to fifty-two months in prison, but Romania wants him back, to serve four years there, first, because he hacked their government officials, and was convicted. The US is to send him back, serve his four there, then be sent back here, to do his fifty-two months. "Lazar said he chose to use "proxy servers in Russia," describing them as the best, providing anonymity." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/04/romanian-hacker-guccifer-breached-clinton-server-it-was-easy.html Wikipedia on Guccifer: "The hacker's IP address was traced to Russia, however there was no certainty as to whether this was his actual location or whether he had used a proxy to hide his true location." On Hillary: "Lehel provided no proof of his claim, and U.S. investigators found no evidence to support the claim. U.S. officials have also said that if Lehel had obtained information from Clinton's servers, he would have publicly released such information, as he did when he obtained access to other high-profile individuals, such as Sidney Blumenthal and George W. Bush." "In a statement of facts filed with his plea agreement, [Lehel] admitted that from at least October 2012 to January 2014, he intentionally gained unauthorized access to personal email and social media accounts belonging to approximately 100 Americans, and he did so to unlawfully obtain his victims' personal information and email correspondence. His victims included an immediate family member of two former U.S. presidents, a former member of the U.S. Cabinet, a former member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and a former presidential advisor, he admitted. [Lehel] admitted that in many instances, he publically [sic] released his victims’ private email correspondence, medical and financial information and personal photographs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer#Claim_regarding_Hillary_Clinton_email_server If they try to lay this on Guccifer, that will be odd, when the court claims that he nor they could provide no evidence that he hacked Hillary. Since her server was unsecured, I'd say he may have done it, but where is the proof? Also, you'll note that he used Russian proxies, just as any other Hacker could have done. A US hacker can use a Russian proxy, and their trace will end up in Russia, and vice versa. The US has proxy servers too. Of course, Guccifer had his own website where he posted his stuff, etc. Then there was DC Leaks, who released stuff, along with Wikileaks, so they don't know who did what.
    2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. Ezilla 45 When you mentioned Snopes, that reminds me of the lie that they told, about an eight point strategy of the Marxist leftists, or the New Left. Someone did get it off, and claimed that Saul Alinsky wrote it, but in actuality, it was a student of Alinsky's, named Professor Frances Fox Piven who did, along with another Marxist professor, named Richard Cloward, at Columbia University. Alinsky published the plan or strategy in his Marxist activist groups literature, along with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and Snopes conveniently left that truth out, claiming that it was all false. The plan was called the Cloward–Piven strategy, which was about toppling western governments; mainly the US. Saul Alinsky”s inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"." Saul Alinsky was the Marxist bastard, who Hillary idolized, and wrote her senior thesis about. The Clintons and Obama are friends with, and were taught by, that lot. Yes, the cat lady that runs Snopes, is a leftist liar.
    2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/ Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state: 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. Look into this: Communist Party USA Democratic Socialists of America SDS Students for a Democratic Society Weather Underground (Weathermen) William Charles "Bill" Ayers (Weathermen) Bernardine Dohrn (Weathermen) Kathy Boudin (Weathermen) David Gilbert (Weathermen) Larry Grathwohl (Weathermen) Michael Klonsky (Weathermen) Chicago's school reform movement. Ayers stated that it was to teach revolutionary communism. ACORN
    2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. When you read about Hillary in the book, Guilty As Sin, you will find out that she had a strict upbringing, and how that damaged her is unknown, but it states that it did warp her mental faculties. She then goes off the Wesleyan College, where she gets involved with groups such as Students for a Democratic Society, (which is a Marxist-Communist front group), and she makes the Marxist radical, Saul Alinsky her idol. Hillary even wrote her senior dissertation about Alinsky, with his help, and she stayed in contact with the red bastard until he died. While in College, she takes courses on political science, and becomes an attorney, whom are all taught to lie at the drop of a hat. Worse, she has most of the symptoms of someone who is a sociopath, by her own actions. Below, is more about Hillary's idol, Saul Alinsky. The Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: "Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state." (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature and The Nation magazine, 1966): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. 2015 article by Piven, stating how the strategy has been working: https://www.thenation.com/article/think-the-us-is-the-foremost-global-superpower-think-again/ "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and [Marxist] political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"." From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large “speaking” fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. Lambert Lum: Evidently, you can't see the trees for the forest. It is about global power, and who controls the oil and gas. Once Europe and Britain are dependent upon suppliers controlled by Russia, then Russia can dictate to them, via the nations he controls, with threats of cutting them off, or raising prices. That is why Russia just refinanced Venezuela's debt, so Russia can control them, and their oil. It's well known that Putin is trying to go after the energy resources everywhere. It's about two globalist powers, The NATO group against Russia, which used to control the Warsaw Pact. It's about money, dominion, and power. It has been since WWII. It is also about the US dollar, which OPEC agreed to use to purchase oil. Russia and China have been trying to stop that. The US dollar is backed by oil. It's not about US wanting oil, it's about the UK and Europe, on top of the US dollar. The NATO nations use the US to fight their battles, and the US agreed to do it under NATO. That is why the regime changes have occurred in the Middle-East, to put in place rulers favorable to the US and its allies. It was what the Shah of Iran was all about. Anyone that served in the Gulf War can verify what is going on. RFK Jr, happens to know these people, he's a politician, just like his entire family. They're in the ultra-rich clique, with the banks and energy cartel. His uncle was John F. Kennedy. He knows what he's talking about, though he put a left-wing spin upon it all. It was Haliburton, who was going to build the pipeline, to supply Europe with natural gas, and later, oil. The Saudis, and Iraqis would profit from it, just as would Qatar, who would supply the gas, and they're the NATO allies. RFK Jr. is not "this guy."
    2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. The dumb moron contradicted himself. First, he claimed that there was only two shots, then he claimed the first missed, but he was shot twice after. What an imbecile. It's not about how he was killed, but who was was responsible for it. It was the communists residing in the US. The new documents verify that Oswald was involved with the Communist Party USA, and so was Jack Ruby, via the Chicago mob. The SCDCP (Southern California District Communist Party), in LA, quickly held a meeting about what to do. They settled on keeping quiet, while they decided whether to "defend" Oswald, or "scream frame-up." Guss Hall, the head of CPUSA, was caught sending a letter to the Kremlin about Johnson, and he had a meeting with two other communists. Hall was afraid to leave his NY apartment for a week. The Dallas PD had leaked that Oswald had letters on CPUSA stationary, within his effects, which told him how he should proceed, and what to do about "noisy" (probably nosy) neighbors. The FBI proved that Oswald was not a FBI informant. He had no informant number, nor was he ever paid. The informant ID number that some claim he had, matched other people, and one was a hooker. If you want to know who had Kennedy killed, it was either ordered from someone at the Kremlin, by Castro, or someone within the CPUSA. There was also a report which mentioned that an informant claimed that Texan politicians may have been involved. Anyhow, you can blame the communists in the US, who also belonged to the Democratic Party, for being behind it, because of the Bay of Pigs, and our attempts at assassinating Castro, and other Cuban communists.
    2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. When you have a corrupt Marxist President, who has ties to the corrupt radical Marxist revolutionary activists, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, (who were involved in bombing American cities), and this President puts into place these agency heads, then what can you expect? Hillary Rodham was born in Chicago, (where Obama, Ayers, and Dohrn are from). Hillary idolized the Marxist radical, Saul Alinsky; writing her senior dissertation about the Marxist criminal, so one can see where this corruption was not only taught, but where it originates from. Saul Alinsky taught Francis Fox Piven at Chicago, who was the co-author of the Marxist Cloward-Piven Strategy in 1966, written in The Nation magazine. Just last year, 2015, Piven wrote another article for The Nation, bragging about how everything was falling into place. Let's look at how much of this plan the DNC has put into place. LBJ brought in the Welfare portion. Bill Clinton brought in NAFTA to destroy the economy, sending work out of the US. Hillary tried healthcare but it failed. Obama brings in Common Core, takes religion out of schools, and takes out the state control of education. He then brings the national debt up to a unsustainable level, and brings in healthcare that was designed to fail. Hillary's task was to socialize healthcare after it failed, and go after the 2nd Amendment by stacking the Supreme Court and using executive orders. Obama has already used executive orders against guns, which was not spoken of in the press. Obama and Hillary want to tax the rich and make them pay. Almost all of the eight steps of the Cloward-Piven Strategy have been implemented. Cloward-Piven Strategy: "Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state." (From The Nation magazine): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
    1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. For them to put up the fallacy of Baphomet, as some call it, which was an invention of Eliphas Levi, and didn't exist before he had an artist draw it in 1856, shows that they are an utter moron, and do not really have any knowledge of theology or biblical history. In other words, what a so-called satan worshiper thinks is real, is a fallacy. They are worshiping a fake idol, which was an 1856 invention of a snake oil salesman. The word, Baphomet, if that is how it was meant to be pronounced, was an invention of King Philip the Fair of France, which he used in a scam to rob the Templar banks, since they were the royal bankers. He threatened to send the Pope back to Italy, to a certain death, to get him to go along with the scam. Earlier, King Philip had robbed the Goldsmiths, then the Lombard Bankers, because of his excessive spending, and kicked them out of the country. His next and final step, was to not only rob the banks, but the army that controlled them. He succeeded, by accusing them of heresy, and using the inquisition and a cowardly pope on the take, to convict them. He invented Baphomet, again, if that was what he was trying to pronounce, and claimed that the Templars were worshiping such a thing. Of course, some admitted to it, because they were under the most cruel torture that could be placed on them, where he had them sign a prewritten confession. They recanted everything as he had them killed. Baphomet was supposedly invented by the king, from a word that a Crusader used to describe a Mosque, which he had heard, and that he had written as "Bafumarias" in 1098. So, in reality, whoever put that up, is celebrating the worst cruelty and hate of a corrupt, murdering, and pathetic thief-king. If any good Floridian would, drive over it with a truck.
    1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. The Clinton campaign is founded on red communism. The Communist Party USA is backing Hillary for 2016. Think not? Read below: From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/ By the way, the birth certificate that Obama had the gall to post on a US Government website, was a forgery, making it fraud. Not only did I take it apart, layer by layer, using Photoshop, but many others did too, including several police departments. I would swear an oath on that, in court, and give testimony on it. Last, now, she has been caught in debit and credit fraud, overcharging donors on their bank accounts. This is wire fraud. Exclusive: Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors http://observer.com/2016/09/exclusive-hillary-clinton-campaign-systematically-overcharging-poorest-donors/
    1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. There was a lot of truth spoken here, whether we conservatives wish to hear it or not, and most don't because they do not understand the politics of the Middle-East (Western Asia and Egypt in North Africa). Why Fox will not explain this, I have no idea. In the Middle-East, the counties politics are separate from their religion and sharia law. The northern countries are socialist/communist in their politics, and the south, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan are not. That is what Afghanistan and Iraq was really all about, the political control within those countries. In Iraq, it was the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party - Iraq Region (that of Saddam), which happens to be the same party that was installed in Syria, by an Iraqi led coup, under Assad's father. In Iran, after the Shah did his runner, it came under Russian control with the Ayatollah. Next, was Russia's invasion into Afghanistan, which borders Pakistan, during Carter. In Syria, Assad's political party is the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region. It is part of a political front, known as the National Progressive Front. The National Progressive Front consists of: Syrian Regional Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party Arab Socialist Movement Arab Socialist Union Syrian Communist Party (Khalid Bakdash faction) Syrian Communist Party (Yusuf Faisal faction) Social Democratic Unionists Socialist Unionists Democratic Socialist Unionist Party Arabic Democratic Unionist Party National Vow Movement Read from the links below, and you will understand what the US is trying to stop the spread of. It is stopping the spread of Marxism/Communism into southern Asia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Progressive_Front_(Syria) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Socialist_Ba%27ath_Party_%E2%80%93_Syria_Region https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%27ath_Party Separate the Muslim's religion and law from their politics, as they are completely different beasts. The radical Muslims are within and from these Marxist/Communist groups. They have been since the end of WWII. Yes, Putin did lie to Trump, and I'm sure Trump misled Putin about the US. That happens all the time, and has since this country was founded. What is going on now, is from a policy that was started under Eisenhower, after WWII, to stop the spread of communism, and to keep control of the resources in southern Asia.
    1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. Noneshere He also pardoned several Wall Street crooks, and one in particular was Marc Rich, who made illegal oil deals with Iran during the Iran Hostage Crisis. There was also Almon Glenn Braswell, convicted of mail fraud and perjury, and was tied to Hillary's brother. He defrauded many elderly citizens of millions. Let's not mention the trail of women that Clinton had affairs with; one now has a BJ named after her. I agree that Bill Clinton is as far from being a gentleman as they come. Some of the Pardons: Peter MacDonald had been sentenced to 14 years at a Federal Prison in Texas for fraud, extortion, inciting riots, bribery, and corruption stemming from the Navajo purchase of the Big Boquillas Ranch in Northwestern Arizona. On the day before President Clinton left office, U.S. Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy lobbied the White House to commute the sentence of the former leader of the Navajo Nation. MacDonald's sentence was commuted after he served 10 years. Carlos Vignali had his sentence for cocaine trafficking commuted, after serving 6 of 15 years in federal prison. Almon Glenn Braswell was pardoned of his 1983 mail fraud and perjury convictions. In 1998 he was under federal investigation for money laundering and tax evasion charges. Braswell and Carlos Vignali each paid approximately $200,000 to Hillary Clinton's brother, Hugh Rodham, to represent their respective cases for clemency. Hugh Rodham returned the payments after they were disclosed to the public. Braswell would later invoke the Fifth Amendment at a Senate Committee hearing in 2001, when questioned about allegations of his having systematically defrauded senior citizens of millions of dollars. Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, members of the radical Weather Underground organization, both had sentences for weapons and explosives charges commuted: Evans served 16 years of her 40-year sentence, and Rosenberg served 16 of her 58 years. [The Clintons claim to be against the 2nd amendment, but they did this]. Marc Rich, a fugitive who had fled the U.S. during his prosecution, was residing in Switzerland. Rich owed $48 million in taxes and was charged with 51 counts of tax fraud, was pardoned of tax evasion. He was required to pay a $1 million fine and waive any use of the pardon as a defense against any future civil charges that were filed against him in the same case. Critics complained that Denise Eisenberg Rich, his former wife, had made substantial donations to both the Clinton library and to Mrs. Clinton's senate campaign. According to Paul Volcker's independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels (640,000 m3) of oil. Longtime Clinton supporters and Democratic leaders such as former President Jimmy Carter, James Carville and Terry McAuliffe, were all critical of the Clinton pardon. Carter said the pardons were "disgraceful." Susan McDougal, who had already completed her sentence, was pardoned for her role in the Whitewater scandal. McDougal had served the maximum possible 18 months, including eight in solitary confinement, on contempt charges for refusing to testify about Clinton's role. Dan Rostenkowski, a former Democratic Congressman from Illinois and Chairman of House Ways and Means Committee, was pardoned for his role in the Congressional Post Office scandal. Rostenkowski had served 13 months of a 17-month sentence before being released in 1997. After his release from prison, Clinton granted him a pardon in December 2000. Mel Reynolds, a Democratic Congressman from Illinois, was convicted of bank fraud, 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice, and solicitation of child pornography. His sentence was commuted on the bank fraud charge and he was allowed to serve the final months under the auspices of a halfway house. Reynolds had served his entire sentence on child sex abuse charges before the commutation of the later convictions. Patty Hearst, who was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army in 1974. After being isolated and threatened with death, she became supportive of their cause, making propaganda announcements for them and taking part in illegal activities. After her arrest in 1975, she was found guilty of bank robbery. Her conviction and long prison sentence were widely seen as unjust, but the procedural correctness of her trial was upheld by the courts. Hearst's sentence was commuted by President Jimmy Carter, and she was pardoned by President Bill Clinton. Roger Clinton, the president's half-brother, was pardoned for drug charges after having served the entire sentence more than a decade earlier. Roger Clinton would be charged with drunk driving and disorderly conduct in an unrelated incident within a year of the pardon. He was also briefly alleged to have been utilized in lobbying for the Braswell pardon, among others. However, no wrongdoing was uncovered. Harvey Weinig, a former Manhattan lawyer who was sentenced in 1996 to 11 years in prison for facilitating an extortion-kidnapping scheme and helping launder at least $19 million for the Cali cocaine cartel.
    1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. This is what the left-wing professors, who Bill Ayers et al taught, depend on. The student snowflakes have no idea that they are sitting in a thought reform program, when they are taught cultural Marxism/socialism, such as capitalism is bad, nationalize all industry, cops are pigs, tax the rich, make the rich pay, demand social programs such as welfare and medicine, be anarchists, protest, riot, free speech is bad, gun rights are bad, religion is bad, postmodernism is good, social justice, black studies, LGBT studies, Hispanic studies, and that Marx, Engels, Marcuse, and Adorno are our savior; they're just misunderstood. They're being taught radical communism, and are too blind to see it, because they believe that a university has all the answers, and that a professor would never lie to them. They refuse to listen to anyone from the right lecture, including other professors, mainly because their left-wing professors have threatened them with their grades. They ask for everything, even though our GDP is lower than our national debt. Who will pay for it? Margaret Thatcher, on Feb. 5, 1976, in a TV interview for Thames TV This Week, said, "...and Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They [socialists] always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them." Prof. Mary Grabar, Ph.D., English, University of Georgia in 2002: "Bill Ayers likens a traditional school to prison because it requires students adhere to dress codes, schedules, and rules of discipline. But he has had captive audiences and has used his power as a professor to indoctrinate future teachers. His education philosophy is based on anarchism, progressivism, and Marxism. It’s all about radicalizing children in social justice lessons, and making them see themselves as victims of an evil capitalistic system." "I want to show that although Ayers was a failed bomber, he was successful in helping to transform and destroy education. And he did it at taxpayers’ expense. He has trained hundreds of teachers. He worked closely with Obama and [U.S. Secretary of Education] Arne Duncan in Chicago in funding programs aimed at radicalizing students. One of his closest colleagues, Linda Darling-Hammond, was on Obama’s education transition team, and was in charge of developing one of the two Common Core tests. And Bill Ayers has appeared at conferences with Duncan and other officials in organizations that devised Common Core." "What Bill Ayers would have in the classroom extends the 1960s agenda of smashing monogamy, ending the bourgeois family and its values, destroying the work ethic, [and] patriotism. So what we have is kids indoctrinated with lessons about the police—the 1960s narrative about the “pigs”—fatherless, rootless, joining gangs, and looting in the streets. It’s a Marxist’s dream come true. Those like Bill Ayers don’t have to do the dangerous work of setting bombs any more. They can watch the Crips and the Bloods unite against the police, as we’ve been seeing on the streets of Baltimore. They can watch from the comfort of their homes in nice gentrified neighborhoods, as they collect retirement checks and honoraria for speaking gigs."
    1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. Below, I quote Elaine Pagels, PhD, from her book, “The Origin of Satan,” 1995: "In biblical sources, the Hebrew term, “the satan” [ha-satan], describes an adversarial role. It is not the name of a particular character. Although Hebrew storytellers, as early as the sixth century B.C.E., occasionally introduced a supernatural character, whom they called “the satan”; what they meant, was any one of the angels sent by God, for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity." Pagels PhD in religion is from Harvard, and she teaches it at Princeton. Next, I quote Rabbi Tovia Singer, on the subject of satan: "Although this well-known Christian doctrine has much in common with the pagan Zoroastrian Persian dualism from which it spawned, it is completely alien to the teachings of the Jewish Scriptures. In fact, this Christian notion that [the] Satan, in an act of outright defiance, ceased to function as God had intended him to, suggests that God created something imperfect or defective". In Job, it is written as the satan, (ha-satan), it was not the name of the angel, but his temporary job title, to obstruct Job, and play an adversary. The angel's name is unknown. That is why Jesus called Peter a satan and a stumbling block over an argument. Next, I quote Rabbi Dr. Raymond Apple: "The word Satan figures in the Hebrew Bible, but not as a proper name. As a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. It is sometimes used in a human sense; in Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. "It does not begin to have a superhuman sense until late in the Biblical period; in Zechariah 3 and the Book of Job it is applied to the prosecutor in the heavenly court. But even in this sense, Satan is not a demon. At best, he is one of the celestial beings, but it may be that the word is merely a colorful metaphor and does not imply that there is any actual being with that name. Nor is Satan opposed to God. At worst, he is simply a devil’s advocate drawing God’s attention to things that appear to be wrong. "Kaufmann Kohler’s theory, in his “Jewish Theology”, chapter 31, is that just as the serpent in the creation story “represents the evil inclination which arises in man with his first consciousness of freedom”, so Satan is an allegorical [fictional] figure “representing the evil of the world, both physical and moral”. "In post-Biblical Jewish sources there are very few references to Satan, and those that are found have no dogmatic or authoritative significance. Satan continues to represent the impersonal force of evil; thus, the Tosefta Shabbat advises that one should “not go on a journey with a wicked man, because Satan accompanies him”. In Jewish liturgy the few references to Satan are all impersonal, for instance the evening prayer that God may remove the adversary “from before us and behind us”, and the morning prayer for protection from “the destroying adversary”. "Popular lore has a far stronger notion of Satan deriving from the New Testament. There he not only personifies the spirit of evil but assumes an independent personality hostile to Jesus and to God. As a result, Milton, writing in an age when people regarded Satan as the presiding demon in stark opposition to God, was able, at least in the first two or three books of “Paradise Lost”, to draw a sympathetic picture of Satan and turn him into almost an epic hero. "For Judaism, all this goes much too far." Also, from Dr. Helen Bond: "There's no kind of prince of darkness; somebody who stands in opposites to God. Throughout most of the texts, there's no concept at all of an evil force." Dr. Helen Bond, MTheol PhD, Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland. Quote from "The History Of The Devil".
    1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. Dr. Mary Grabar, Ph.D., English, from the University of Georgia in 2002, about what has taken place in both primary and secondary education: "Bill Ayers likens a traditional school to prison because it requires students adhere to dress codes, schedules, and rules of discipline. But he has had captive audiences and has used his power as a professor to indoctrinate future teachers. His education philosophy is based on anarchism, progressivism, and Marxism. It’s all about radicalizing children in social justice lessons, and making them see themselves as victims of an evil capitalistic system. "I want to show that although Ayers was a failed bomber, he was successful in helping to transform and destroy education. And he did it at taxpayers’ expense. He has trained hundreds of teachers. He worked closely with Obama and [U.S. Secretary of Education] Arne Duncan in Chicago in funding programs aimed at radicalizing students. One of his closest colleagues, Linda Darling-Hammond, was on Obama’s education transition team, and was in charge of developing one of the two Common Core tests. And Bill Ayers has appeared at conferences with Duncan and other officials in organizations that devised Common Core. "What Bill Ayers would have in the classroom extends the 1960s agenda of smashing monogamy, ending the bourgeois family and its values, destroying the work ethic, [and] patriotism. So what we have is kids indoctrinated with lessons about the police—the 1960s narrative about the “pigs”—fatherless, rootless, joining gangs, and looting in the streets. It’s a Marxist’s dream come true. Those like Bill Ayers don’t have to do the dangerous work of setting bombs any more. They can watch the Crips and the Bloods unite against the police, as we’ve been seeing on the streets of Baltimore. They can watch from the comfort of their homes in nice gentrified neighborhoods, as they collect retirement checks and honoraria for speaking gigs." [sic]
    1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. Yup, that is the typical liberal crackpot, Madonna, which shows them to be the scum that they truly are. These protesters are lowbrowed, knuckle dragging, ill-raised, ill-educated, mouth breathing, guttersnipe tramps, who always resort to vulgarity and blackguard, when they are proven to be incorrect, along with being liars of the worst sort. Let's see who else these feminists had speaking at their rally. Why, it was Angela Davis, who ran as the VP candidate with Guss Hall for the Communist Party USA ticket in 1980 and 1984. That is who is filling these women's heads with Marxism, and teaching them to be radical activists who disregard the law. Angela Davis speaking at the rally: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265554/millennials-guide-angela-davis-and-other-lloyd-billingsley Then, we have Jane Fonda agitating the pipeline protest, when Trump stated that he wanted to work with the Indian nation, to safely run the pipeline. Yes, Hanoi Jane, who went to North Vietnam, and sat with a group of communist soldiers for a photo-op, and decried what a bad place the US was, and what good people the North Vietnamese were, while US soldiers were being killed. You see folks, the Communist Party USA still exists today. They quit running candidates, when they threw their full support behind two new candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Look it up, as the communists supported their campaigns on the Communist Party USA's website. The Nation magazine is another who fully supported both, and they are as far left wing as a magazine can be. They publish stories by every communist in the US, such as Bill Ayers and others. Let's not forget the inauguration day protesters. Those who were caught burning newspaper stands and trash in the DC streets, dressed in all black, who were interviewed. They proclaimed themselves to be Marxists and communists, with one waving a red flag with the hammer and sickle on it. They also stated that they were from DisruptJ20! That is who these people are.
    1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. I used to have some respect for Trumka, because of what he made of himself, until he threw his hat in with John Sweeney, then I watched what he has become. Look into Sweeney, and you'll find someone who rubbed shoulders with Marxist-Communist radicals, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, and took on their ideology. Quote from WND: Sweeney is a socialist activist and a card-carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA, the principal American affiliate of the Socialist International. The DSA has demonstrated a close relationship with Obama over the years. Sweeney is a member of the DSA’s Boston chapter. He served as president of AFL-CIO from 1995 until his retirement last September. He previously served for four terms as president of the controversial Service Employees International Union, or SEIU. During his administration, Sweeney famously aligned the SEIU with ACORN and other leftist groups. Activist and author Joel Kotkin, a fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute, observed how Sweeney brought communists into his union leadership. “The public-sector unions have pushed the entire labor movement to the left,” he said. “The [SEIU] has embraced organizations with a New Left origin, such as ACORN and Cleveland’s Nine to Five, and has even set up its own gay and lesbian caucus. … The rise of these unions led to the elevation of SEIU’s boss, John Sweeney, to head of the labor federation. “No George Meaney-style bread-and-butter unionist, Sweeney is an advocate of European-style democratic socialism,” said Kotkin. “He has opened the AFL-CIO to participation by delegates openly linked to the Communist Party, which enthusiastically backed his ascent. The U.S. Communist Party [CPUSA] says it is now ‘in complete accord’ with the AFL-CIO’s program. ‘The radical shift in both leadership and policy is a very positive, even historic change,’ wrote CPUSA National Chairman Gus Hall in 1996 after the AFL-CIO convention.” Upon assuming the office of the AFL-CIO in 1995, Sweeney was quick to rescind one of the union’s founding rules that banned Communist Party members and loyalists from leadership positions within the federation and its unions. Sweeney welcomed Communist Party delegates to positions of power in his federation. Linda Chavez and Daniel Gray, in their book “Betrayal: How union bosses shake down their bosses and corporate America,” state Sweeney placed a number of DSA allies in his union office. The DSA’s official website carries an endorsement from Sweeney: “I’m proud to a member of a movement for change that puts the cause of working people at the heart of the matter.” With research by Brenda J. Elliott Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2011/02/267317/
    1
  1533. ***** Oh, it wouldn't take them long, as to them, she is an infidel or worse. Though other religions are guilty of brainwashing a child from birth, Islam teaches them hate for those who are not like them, and that is the huge difference. They also teach them to not want or use any technology from the time of Muhammad, but they defy that at many places. What a double standard. What the Muslims think about the west, is that everyone are heretics, but the west does not make it mandatory for one to attend a church or have a state religion. However, when they did have a state religion, it was Christianity, which did not teach a child to hate others nor to kill them, because of their religion. Islam indoctrinates the young into thinking that everyone but another Muslim is beneath them, like an animal, and it is okay to kill them, thus we have 12 year old children running around with RPGs and bombs. This became much worse after the Ayatollah Sayyid Khomeini came into power in Iran. Now, we have the last Ayatollah about to get his hands on a nuclear weapon, if he hasn't already. I stated it then, that it was a bad mistake to allow the Ayatollah to live, but Carter supposedly signed a bill that disallowed assassination. Then again, we should not have put the Shah into power. The one before him was going to nationalize (steal) the oil wells and refineries that other countries built there, but they did it anyhow with the Ayatollah. That is what brought all of this about, the oil wells and the refineries. However, the Muslims allowed the drilling and those refineries to be built on good faith, then nationalized (stole) them, and succeeded. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (BP) and Standard Oil should have knew who they were dealing with; a band of backward desert cutthroat thieves. Muslims stone thieves, or cut off their hands, so Islam has a double standard. All the west did, was to give them a means to great wealth, whereby the Muslims used that to attack the west's so-called heretics, after they stole everything back that helped them. They think nothing of the ancient laws: thou shalt not steal, and thou shall not kill (murder).
    1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. Richard Cohen is a socialist Jew, so I wouldn't put it past him to use the Hitler card. Cohen's a liar, and if you've read his writing, it is pure propaganda, and not fit for the sewer. I wonder what the conservative Jews think about his comments, as there are many? As a matter of fact, his comments are anti-Jewish, and if he practices his faith, he's a grievous sinner over that comment on top of it. Of course, what else can you expect, since his employer is the lying Washington Post, the most red communistic acting newspaper that has ever been written. This is from Wikipedia, and it was sourced, so it's accurate (I checked): "In 1998, Cohen was involved in a dispute with editorial aide Devon Spurgeon that was ultimately mediated by Washington Post management.[5] Cohen reportedly asked Spurgeon questions about "casual sex", told her to "stand up and turn around", and gave her the "silent treatment" for three weeks.[5] Cohen contended that "it was a personality dispute at an office, but it had nothing to do with sexual harassment as the term applies today".[5] "Post management concluded that Spurgeon had been subjected to a "hostile working environment" but not to "sexual harassment" and that Cohen was guilty of "inappropriate behavior"" The Washington Post has been known to be far left progressive liberal since the Nixon administration, and you notice that they swept a sexual harassment case under the rug for Cohen. "Cohen wrote a column in 1986 which argued owners of jewelry stores were right to refuse to allow entry to young black men because of a fear of crime. This column led to the Washington Post's having to apologize.[16]" "Ta-Nehisi Coates for example wrote: "The problem is that Richard Cohen thinks being repulsed isn't actually racist, but "conventional" or "culturally conservative." Obstructing the right of black humans and white humans to form families is a central feature of American racism. If retching at the thought of that right being exercised isn't racism, then there is no racism.[25]"  So, Cohen is not only a sexist pervert, but a sexist perverted racist. Yet, the lying imbecile has the gall to call Trump Hitler? I don't know about anyone else, but have you seen Trump locking up Jews, Freemasons, Gays, or anyone else that he considers undesirable, then having them murdered? Cohen also admitted in an anti-Semitic article, that he lacked "religious conviction".  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cohen_(columnist) I get a kick out of Bono, (Paul David Hewson), who is nothing but a washed up Irish druggie, thinking that he is fit to tell Americans how they should act about politics.
    1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. They claim that there was a reversal in the parties under Nixon, but they're incorrect; it happened much earlier, starting in 1910. Nixon was merely the first Neocon president, and he was a Quaker, where early proto-socialism formed. The truth is, the GOP, starting under Lincoln, was partial to the new socialist doctrine that was actually being preached in some Protestant churches, which was later known as Christian Socialism, and the "social gospel." That was the Whigs' belief under Clay and Greeley. Greeley even hired Karl Marx as his sole British correspondent, and published Marx's screeds in his New York newspaper. That was the real driving force behind the "Radical Republicans." During Reconstruction, they changed the D Party in the south to be just like them, and that resulted in the Bourbon Democrats, which Wilson was from. They were all tied to big business, especially the railroads. When the radical leftists had McKinley killed, Roosevelt came in, who was from this radical strain, and he brought in Progressivism. Wilson was also a Progressive, which is really Socialism. That was why Roosevelt formed the Bull Moose Party, so Wilson could win. From there, the D Party sided more and more with the radical left. However, the GOP tried to do an about-face, starting in 1910, where they booted the Progressives out between 1910-12, and tried to revert the party back to the original ideas of Thomas Jefferson. This faction became known as the Old Right, and they were anti-war, pro liberty, and they were protectionists. This was what 45 tried to revive, and what the Neocons hated. In 1952, the New York Intellectuals, who had left the D Party over their hatred for Stalin, because they were Trotskyites, infiltrated the GOP, and created the Neocons. The D Party had sided with Stalin, and FDR really cosied up to the USSR, where they went farther to the left. The GOP has been split since 1952, with the Neocons pulling the strings since that time, which is what 45 did his best to remove, and clean out. I think everybody is now wise to the Socialists, and it's time to take our nation back.
    1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. BLITZMASCHINE: It has nothing to do with that. The Europeans have been out of oil and natural gas for a long time, which is why Nazi Germany was in Northern Africa and heading toward the Levant during WWII.The British had oil wells already in Iran (the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co., now BP). That is why the US first became involved, to depose Mossadegh for the British under Eisenhower. The British promised Eisenhower access to oil also, as it was the UK and France who took the Ottoman land and divided it up into states, after WWI. The US put their wells on the Saudi's land, who ended up nationalizing the oil industry, but the US stayed with them. The US no longer needs the Saudis, and they know it. Russia took the Germans place in West Asia after WWII, and it has been a proxy war in the Middle-East ever since, trying to keep Russia out, so Europe has a supply of oil and gas. The Europeans use NATO to fight their wars. It wasn't until Nixon, that the US tied the dollar to oil, with an agreement between the US and OPEC to use the US dollar for oil payments. That is what Iraq was about. Afghanistan was about keeping Russia out, with a deal cut under Carter between the US, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan. They knew that if Russia took Afghanistan, Pakistan would be taken next, and eventually, the entirety of West Asia and Northern Africa. We do not fight Russia face to face, we use opposing ethnic groups in West Asia, and pit them against each other in war by proxy. We've been doing so since Eisenhower. It was the Eisenhower administration, who come up with the plan for the Middle-East. That plan was declassified and can be found in FOIA documents. The document states that the US would spread democracy throughout Asia, which is the actions of the NWO. The US has been leading the NWO since WWI, and especially after WWII. NATO was a treaty to appease Europe, stating that if they would not rearm, especially Germany, then NATO, led by the US, would protect them, and go to war. The US makes a profit from it, or the military-industrial complex does. The US sells all the NATO nations their arms and military equipment. The League of Nations, and later, the UN, are products of the NWO, which is a UK and US cabal of industrialists and international banks. It switched from spreading the British Empire worldwide, after WWI, to spreading democracy, with a takeover of world governments.
    1
  1930. 1
  1931. BLITZMASCHINE: The big money is the war debt itself. Every time that US boots are on the ground in the Middle-East, or elsewhere, Europe and the Saudis actually pays for a lot of that. There is a financing triangle there, which consists of the US, British, and Saudi banks, and they run the World Bank, the IMF, and BIS, and the Federal Reserve, along with the Bank of England, and the Rothschild banks throughout Europe. That is what was behind WWI and WWII. The NWO, or the "Cliveden set," aka the Roundtable Group, was a secret group of wealthy elite started by Cecil Rhodes, and later run by Lord Milner starting in 1902 after Rhodes' death, out of the All Souls College at Oxford. They founded a front group known as the Pilgrim's Society in 1902, and they stated that it was for US-UK relations. The group first intended on spreading British Imperialism worldwide and taking back the US. US bankers and industrialists joined that group during Wilson, but WWI happened, which they were behind starting.They financed Lenin, and sent him on his way to Russia, with a few million in cash, with the intent of the Germans marching in and easily taking Russia away from Lenin and the Communists after they had destabilized Russia, but that didn't happen. The Germans tried it twice, during both wars. The NWO is after Asia's natural resources. Anyhow, Britain owed the US a huge war debt over WWI, to the tune of $54 billion, and the US used that as leverage to take over the NWO (Milner's Group), where it switched from spreading British Imperialism to "US democracy." WWI was the death of the British Empire, and their war debt grew after WWII. Other allied European countries owed the US too. This same group financed the Nazi's rise to power, and people like Martin Borman was behind that. Hitler was merely a puppet. The Nazis had a "Black Book" that named the people in the Cliveden set, and they were intending on taking over the NWO if they had taken Britain. This same cabal of the wealthy elite was also behind Eisenhower's policy in Asia. WWII was actually another attempt at Asia, especially Russia, as the NWO does not care who they finance, or what wars they start, as long as their ends are met. They intended on letting Germany do the dirty work in Russia, and the US and its allies would then take Germany. This, in reality, is what the "special relationship" is all about. Almost every US President has been involved with the NWO since Woodrow Wilson, and they intend on installing a one world government, (the UN and EU sprang from that), or as the CFR/RIIA just called it, a "liberal world order," which they claim is now RIP over Trump. That article was just posted on the CFR's website. This is why they have fought Trump tooth and nail. That is what the TPP treaty and the Red Triangle treaty was all about. The NWO was behind Wilson's fourteen point plan, the Federal Reserve, and starting the League of Nations, which flopped. After WWII, the NWO started another front group known as the World Federalist Association, and they, along with the Pilgrims, pushed for the creation of the UN. The UN was to be the authority of the NWO. The Rockefeller family founded the Trilateral Commission under Nixon, to push the same thing, and that is also what the Bilderberg group is all about, along with many NGOs and thinktanks. It's the same cabal of wealthy elite behind all of it. This led to the creation of the EU, and they crawled into bed with ex-Nazis to found it. The one world government would be an undemocratic socialist synarchy form of government, with a world court and world law, very similar to what the EU is now. Professor Carrol Quigley, who taught Bill Clinton at Georgetown U., and was over the Foreign Service School, exposed the NWO in two academic history books. The books were not intended to be made public, but they were. Of course, the British have tried to deny it. The Rhodes scholarship is used to select individuals and pay for their education at Oxford. There, they are brought into the NWO. Other scholarships now fund the same thing, and it is now within several US universities and several college fraternities on campus (especially at Yale).
    1
  1932. Why are the left retarded?: One of these days, the people will awaken, and they will learn that the UK, the US, and Europe are being controlled by the world's largest mafia, ran by the most wealthy elite, who have no morals or scruples. If there is anything to make money on, legal or illegal, then they will do it. The brainchild behind the world cabal was Cecil Rhodes (in 1875) and his friends who had just dissolved the East India Company in 1874 (opium). Rhodes financing came from people such as Alfred Beit and N M Rothschild & Sons. After Rhodes death (1902) in 1926, "Ernest Oppenheimer, an immigrant to Britain and later South Africa who had earlier founded mining company Anglo American plc with American financier J.P. Morgan, was elected to the board of De Beers. He built and consolidated the company's global monopoly over the diamond industry until his death in 1957." The British called them the Cliveden Set and the Roundtable Group. The biggest den of US and British thieves and crooks to ever be partnered together, while calling themselves "Pilgrims." Don't you find it odd, that the British Roundtable Group, along with the Pilgrim's Society, and the World Federalists Association, still exists, and that the group of industrialists and international bankers controlling the EU is also known as the "Roundtable"? The same bankers in the Rhodes/Milner's group, now control the World Bank, the IMF, the BIS, and the financing of it all. How many of the bankers have been busted for money laundering, and helping to hide money offshore?
    1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022.  @forthfarean  Well, the communists have always been here, going back to the days that they had McKinley killed. They (every brand) were allowed to grow, and when they made a pile of money, by illicit means after prohibition by bootlegging, drugs, and gaming, they began their takeover, especially after their friends came here from Frankfurt and began teaching. The left wing had supporters of every kind of socialism, including Stalin and Soviet socialism. Some, during the thirties, all Trotsky supporters, broke away from the left, and infested the right. The GOP started taking them in, all to fight Stalin. That was the biggest mistake ever made, as they also had huge ties to the Levant, and the UK knows well what happened there. All those trials under McCarthy, and many got by with it. Only those supporting Stalin were really affected, while the Trotskyites roamed untouched. In 1952, they finally got into the GOP, at the top, with Nixon, when he was the VP. One of the most corrupt humans possible, and he was deep in the pockets of the Trotskyites, and their branch of the mob, by the time he became president. Watergate, after all, started over him taking money from them down in the Bahamas, and it expanded from there. The Bush family was involved as well, and LBJ was too. GHW Bush was Nixon's underling, and was involved in courting Mao in China. That's the dirty laundry of post-war American politics. Now, many of this Trotskyite lot became the Russian oligarchs, and the entire lot, worldwide, are pulling the strings of politicians in both parties, though after Trump and the House cleaning, its now more on the left.
    1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. Don't you find it funny, that the left, who have always been the racists and white supremacists (KKK, Nazism and Fascism), will not own them, but started an alternate Communist group of violent and racist hatemongers, who claim that they're fighting against white supremacists, but those white supremacists are still left-wing? Make no mistake, Socialism, Marxism, Communism, Nazism, and Fascism, are all left-wing ideologies. Every one of them grew out of French utopian socialism and anarchists, which Marx bastardized into his form of anti-capitalist Communism. Nazism and Fascism all had an amount of the same anti-capitalist socialism within them, just as did Communism. There's no denying it, as anyone can pick up a book on political history or science, and read about their origins. In other words, ANTIFA are fighting against people who have the same beliefs and ideology as they do; the people on the left. There is no right-wing to it, they're lying about it! If you don't believe that, then read Karl Marx's writing, especially his Communist Manifesto, then compare that to the Nazi's Twenty-Five Point Plan, and the Fascist Manifesto. All three groups are radical and racist anti-capitalists, are anti-bourgeois, are socialist, are collectivist, are pro-welfare, are for nationalizing business and banks, are for the redistribution of wealth, are against property ownership, and are antisemitic, thus blaming the Jews for capitalism. The farthest left are the Communists (who ANTIFA claims to be), then Nazism a close second, with the last, Fascism. Last, look up the history of the KKK. It was a racist organization, started in Tennessee, by Democrats, to fight the reconstruction, fight republicanism, and be the terrorist arm of the Democrats, in order to keep black politicians out of government.
    1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. The Democrats will resort to anything, in order to stay out of jail, and the left-wing press will continue to cut their own throats. Remember this, those who really "colluded" are those who accused Trump of collusion. U1, Russian Reset, the Ukraine, money laundering, offshore banking, and the Russian Mafia. Remember Chuck Schumer having a donut and coffee with Putin at a new Russian filling station in New York? Remember the gasoline tax scam that was perpetrated by the Sicilian and Russian Mafia in New York? What districts did Schumer represent? New York's 10th congressional district, which is beside the district for Brighton Beach? Nadler also represents it and Weiner was also of that district. Imagine that. "Before his [Schumer's] election to the Senate, Schumer served in the House of Representatives from 1981 to 1999, first representing New York's 16th congressional district before being redistricted to the 10th congressional district in 1983 and 9th congressional district in 1993. A native of Brooklyn and graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, he was a three-term member of the New York State Assembly from 1975 to 1980." Follow the districts and their representatives. 9th District: "Prior to 2013, the district consisted primarily of middle-class white neighborhoods, including large Jewish, Italian, Irish, and Russian populations, in southern Brooklyn and south central Queens." What district is Harlem in, and who has an office there? WJC? Who has attacked Trump from day one? Why is Giuliani Trump's attorney? Who did Giuliani prosecute? Who are the five families?
    1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. kiolasmash550: It really makes no difference about how many shots were fired, except that Oswald was actually involved in it. He also had help, and had orders. The shooting, itself, is a smokescreen used to take the mind off of who was behind it all, or who ordered it. That is where these records tell the tale, which verifies what many have thought, that it was people within the Communist Party USA, the KGB, and Castro/Cuba that was involved in ordering it. It leads to people in the Democratic Party, itself, who was involved with the CPUSA. Oswald, and the Fair Play For Cuba group, leads back to the Southern California District Communist Party at LA, where they called a quick meeting to invent a "temporary party line," and to decide whether to "defend" Oswald, or shout that it was a "frame-up." Gus Hall immediately went into damage control at their NY CPUSA headquarters, along with Anderson, because the Dallas PD had let it leak, that Oswald's orders was written on CPUSA stationary, and this was found in his personal effects. Anderson had also been in contact Oswald three times, that he admitted to. Anderson traveled to a CPUSA meeting, at Wheeling WV, to try to lay blame on a right-wing extremist group in a meeting. Right-wing, meaning the right of the left-wing, which was the Klan, or the American Nazi Party, of the "New Left". Other CPUSA front groups went on the attack, to distance themselves, and deny that Oswald was a member. One even tried to claim it was officer Tippit who did it, along with members of the John Birch Society. It was shown that it was Oswald, who made contact with the KGB, while in Mexico. Oswald was also involved with people working for Cuba. The Dallas PD had started an investigation into the CPUSA, alongside Oswald's investigation. Jack Ruby was involved with the CPUSA, and the Chicago mob, according to informants. The Chicago mob had their hands in the CPUSA, and the motion picture industry in LA, where the SCDCP was located. The same mob had been in Cuba, and worked with the Russians before they left, and set up shop in Vegas. Ruby had also visited Vegas. It was found that Oswald's wife had used the same attorney as did Ruby. Gus Hall was caught, by the FBI, sending a letter to the Kremlin about Lyndon Johnson. The KGB were going to try to lay the blame on Johnson. However, it looks as if the communists or progressives within in the DNC had made his indictment go away, so Johnson became their puppet for legislation, even though he still worked against them with the FBI, using COINTELPRO, and he allowed the Gulf of Tonkin incident to happen, so we could change to a war footing in Vietnam. I guess he had a little saving grace to him. One informant, claimed that Texas politicians were involved in the assassination. The FBI's COINTELPRO came into being in 1956, and JFK made good use of it, along with Operation Mongoose and the CIA. The only CIA plan that JFK didn't accept, was using a false flag idea, of shooting down a plane, to declare war on Cuba. He decided on disrupting the Cuban government, and trying to assassinate Castro and communists in Cuba. That went on until his death, but still continued until the program was exposed by the Church Committee. This is why they had JFK killed, but it didn't stop Johnson or Nixon.
    1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331.  @dmichael1172  Slaveholders were in the north as well, but the northern apologists don't like speaking about that. On top of that, not everybody was a slaveholder on either side, only a percentage was, and by the time of the war, several had already begun freeing their slaves. All would have released them if the government would have compensated them for their monetary loss, as they had borrowed big money from the north to buy them when it was legal. After the war, most went bankrupt and lost everything. Slavery was wrong, but that was what occurred. The history is more complicated than what many know, as it's more about politics and law, where the tale of what led to the Civil War that's told today is packed full of fabrications, such as Lincoln being a great man, when he was just as racist as anyone else. He was for the Corwin Amendment, which would have permanently legalized slavery. That constitutional amendment was offered to the south, yet they left anyhow. Why? State's rights, northern corruption, high tariffs, national banking, a standing army, warmongering, and not strictly reading or following constitutional law. Slavery was only a portion of it, but it was the card they pulled to cover up the rest. The party that became the GOP was not the Old Republicans of Jefferson. They were the old Federalists, who had lost their party, and were mixed in with a few other smaller factions that became the Whig Party. They've tried to rewrite the history of Hamilton's big brother government Federalists, who were in bed with Britain, and hide what party they later became since the war. That was then forced upon everyone with and after reconstruction, and it was they that had also crawled into bed with socialism by the late 1800s, which came into education with Christian Socialism in Massachusetts and New York. By 1901, it had infected both parties, mainly in the north, under the guise of progressivism with Roosevelt and Wilson.
    1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. The politicians are controlled, in the US and the UK, by a cabal or society of industrialists and bankers. They have been controlled since 1900, especially after 1902, out of New York City and their sister society in Britain at Cliveden. Their front group call themselves "Pilgrims." This cabal controls members on both sides of the aisle, and they control the purse of both nations, their credit. France is also controlled by this very lot. The politicians control the upper echelon of the agencies. That is the "deep state" and the cabal behind them. The State Department is intimately involved with this cabal, and every new US Ambassador to Britain becomes a member (a Pilgrim). That is the "Anglo-American Establishment," and in reality, it is the largest organized crime syndicate in the world, involved in politics and banking, and they are protected by the governments of the US and Britain, which sprang from the loins of the old monopoly companies chartered by the British Crown. It is the "Gordian Knot" that controls it all. Comey worked for HSBC. Does anyone know the history of this bank, and what it was founded for? What was HSBC convicted of doing, while Comey was working for them? What ties do the Clintons have to this cabal? What business did FDR's grandfather, Warren Delano, make his money at? As the world turns. Trump knows, and they know that he knows. Does anyone wonder why they want him gone? Trump is not playing the game. If you only knew the truth of it all. "If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched."__GHW Bush (1992) The public lays it on secret societies, except that the ones that they name have nothing at all to do with it. They are Inferior secret societies that everyone knows about, and anyone can join, which are innocent (Freemasonry, the Rotary, Oddfellows, etc). Next, there are the intermediary secret societies that have a completely different structure, and they're invite only, which many haven't heard of, but one in particular calls themselves Pilgrims (a front group),.and they are controlled by the next group that I'll mention, which is a superior society, that is kept hidden, and the general public hardly knows anything about them. They may have only a few hundred members, all ultra-wealthy elitists (bankers and industrialists). This last group is what the British public called the Cliveden Set or Milner's Group. Nobody knows its real name. Research the "Round Table Movement," which still exists. See this old NYT article: https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1902/04/09/101945773.pdf
    1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. buddyjoey: Actually, it does involve Mueller's investigation, as the FBI used the fake Steele dossier to target Carter Page, who had volunteered to work on the GOP campaign. That gave them the inroad to investigate the entire transition team for "Russian collusion," via an order by the DOJ, because Page had worked for US finance interests in Russia, and was known to be sympathetic to the Russians. The FBI used a Yahoo news article, sourced to Steele, to back up Steele's own dossier. They also targeted Papadopolus, a relatively unknown, who was in London. He was targeted over something stated "in a barroom," and that was set forth by Strozk. Papadopolus and Page were not cooperating or working with each other, according to the memo, and Papadopolus, a charlatan, somehow, situated himself inside the campaign, and nobody really knew who he was. The professor that Papadopolus spoke to, claimed that he said none of the such about Russians, and that he supported Hillary Clinton. Steele had also named Trump's attorney, claiming that he had been to Prague, when he had not, and he proved it. Rosenstein allowed Mueller to go where any lead led him, based on info collected in those warrants, in his order. Thus, it wasn't limited to a Russian investigation, as it was open ended. Page led to the others, because of the order. Congress ordered the investigation, based upon the dossier. During their investigation, they found out about Flynn speaking to the Russian ambassador, or any other dignitary, but that was during the transition, after the election, and it was legal for him to do so, as all incoming presidential staff do it. What he did, was to lie to Pence and the FBI about speaking to the ambassador. They also called in Donald Jr., over him speaking with the female Russian attorney, who lied about having info on Hillary Clinton. She tried to hand him documents about "Russian adoptions," which he was smart enough to refuse. Donald Jr, readily admitted to what happened, and he was questioned about it. The Steele dossier led to all of that, as they used Page as the excuse to investigate the entire transition team, due to Rosenstein's order to Mueller. Trump agreed with it, and stated that if the Russian's were involved, then he wanted to know. Last, several people mentioned in the memo are now suing Steele, over what he wrote, for libel, in the British courts. It is also coming out, that Steele may have gotten most of what he wrote from a hatchet man employed by the Clintons, their "plumber," which a few journalists have been talking about, along with Dick Morris, who used to work for the Clintons. This guy had written a similar paper, and he is a very uncredible source. He is who the Clinton's used against the women that Bill messed with, including Lewinski. That is why many attorneys are calling it the fruit of the poisonous tree, as the entire investigation, asked for by congress, and the warrants used to investigate it, was triggered by the Steele dossier. The memo only proved what was already public knowledge, except for pointing out the leakers within the FBI, and verifying their ties to the Clinton campaign and the DNC.
    1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. What did Huma state about Hillary to her brother in an e-mail on Sept. 3rd, 2016? This was reported by Superstation95, and they said it was leaked from the NYPD. The e-mail purportedly came after the seized AW laptop. They did their best to shut this up after the report. >> ON SEPTEMBER 03, 2016 AT 8:57 PM. HUMA ABEDIN @YAHOO.COM WROTE: >> SORRY FOR MY LATE REPLY, HASSAN. YES, LET ME >> TELL YOU ABOUT HER. THE WOMAN IS SO ODD, SO STARVED FOR >> VALIDATION, SO TORMENTED AND VAIN IT IS A CONSTANT >> SURPRISE TO ME THAT ANYONE TAKES HER SERIOUSLY. >> EVERYONE ON THE TEAM KNOWS HOW UNWELL SHE IS, BUT >> THEY’RE MORE DETERMINED THAN EVER TO SEE HER WIN. THIS >> WOMAN THAT HAS A DOZEN SEIZURES A DAY. THIS GODLESS >> SHRIEKING MALCONTENT PASSED OUT IN HER MEDICAL VAN. >> THIS WALKING CADAVER. SHE’S NONFUNCTIONAL. HASSAN, >> NOBODY CARES. WE SOBER HER UP FOR SPEECHES AND >> INDULGE THE PRESS CORPS WITH CHEAP SENTIMENT. THE FIRST >> FEMALE PRESIDENT. THE LAST GLASS CEILING, ETC. THEY TRIP >> OVER THEMSELVES LINING UP BEHIND HER. SURELY THEY KNOW >> IT IS NOT HER THEY’RE GETTING. IT’S THE ONE IN THE CORNER, >> THE QUIET HELPER, YOUR SISTER HUMA. YOU ASKED ME ONCE >> HOW I DID IT. HOW DID I TAKE THE CASTLE? HASSAN, I DIDN’T >> TAKE IT, THEY GAVE IT TO ME. YES, THERE WAS A COST. I WILL >> ADMIT, SUBJECTING MYSELF TO AW AND WJC >> IS MORTAL TORTURE. BUT I DO IT >> GLADLY, BROTHER, EVERYTHING THEY ASK OF ME, HOWEVER >> SICK AND DEPRAVED. I DO IT, AND I SMILE, REJOICING AT THE >> THOUGHT OF WHOSE GLORY I SERVE.
    1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1