Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "'NOT AN ERROR': Ramaswamy sounds off on LinkedIn over alleged censorship" video.

  1. That's called election interference when any voter, regardless of party, is coerced to vote another way due to not being able to see the other candidate's platform or political thoughts, and the company should be held liable for it. Title 52, Section 1: "(b) Intimidation, threats, or coercion No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, or Member of the House of Representatives, Delegates or Commissioners from the Territories or possessions, at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate."
    2