Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Tousi TV"
channel.
-
921
-
527
-
499
-
495
-
417
-
240
-
214
-
185
-
176
-
140
-
137
-
133
-
122
-
110
-
106
-
106
-
97
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
82
-
81
-
76
-
76
-
67
-
63
-
60
-
59
-
55
-
54
-
51
-
46
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
35
-
34
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
Bill Clinton was bad in many ways, but when James Carville said "it's about the economy, stupid," he was spot on target, and Trump understood that as well. It's about trade, the budget, finding natural resources, energy, employment for the public, and a multitude of other things. Now, we have a moronic president who plagiarized his dissertation, compared to Trump, who graduated from Wharton.
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
@maj9676 That's not how it works, as all UN contracting states, and this is all of Europe, must accept them when they enter that contracting state, and the "refugee" must quickly present themselves to them and ask for asylum. "Direct," would be those flown in directly from Afghanistan, etc, but not those that walked across several contracting states, which, by law, were abidged to take them, and those refugees also broke the law by not quickly presenting themselves and asking the first contracting state they were in for asylum. Only then could they request being sent on to another state.
There were several attorneys, here, in the US, that brought this up over those travelling through Guatamalla and Mexico, etc., to come to the US. Both were contracting states with the UN.
Also, any contracting state has the right to expell a refugee, without them being able to present evidence, on the grounds of national security.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
No, but they signed you up for it in 1992, down in Rio, at the Earth Summit. 100+ nations signed up for it.
1972 - The United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHS) in Stockholm
1982 - The 1982 Earth Summit in Nairobi (Kenya). An Earth Summit was held in Nairobi, Kenya, from 10 to 18 May 1982. The events of the time (Cold War) and the disinterest of US President Ronald Reagan (who appointed his delegated daughter Of the United States) made this summit a failure. It is not even mentioned as an official Earth Summit.
1992 - The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) or Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
2002 - The World Summit on Sustainable Development, Earth Summit 2002 or Rio+10, Johannesburg (South Africa)
2009 - 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference or Copenhagen Summit, Copenhagen (Denmark)
2012 - The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) or Rio+20, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
2018 - The 7th Digital Earth Summit 2018, DES-2018, on Digital Earth for Sustainable Development in Africa was to be held in El Jadida, Morocco, at the Faculty of Science, Chouaib Douakkali University from April 17-19, 2018
2019 - The Santiago Climate Change Conference, featuring the 25th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 25) to the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) and meetings of the UNFCCC subsidiary bodies, will convene from 2nd to 13th of December 2019.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Before there was such a thing as "climate science," atmospheric physics existed, which pioneered the study, and the main person over that was Prof. Richard Lindzen from MIT, who has stated that yes, CC exists, but it's not as bad as the alarmists claim. He also stated that we've had these cycles over the last 15,000 years, and we're still here.
Lindzen also alluded to the alarmists' claims originating from grant money. In fact, the Earth Institue was formed at none other than Columbia U for CC by an economist named Jeffery Sachs, and he is a Bernie supporter. He now runs the CC agenda at the UN.
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I am waiting for the reaction of the public, when the people find out just how infiltrated their governments have become, with China and the CCP. The infiltration of western nations, states, counties, and cities, as well as education, corporations, foundations, charities, and NGOs will be huge. The public will find out that they were sold out, for profit, by the politicians, academics, and businessmen.
Some will find out that they were conned, by China, into investing in their ghost cities, which are literally falling apart three years after the buildings were built. When the Chinese real estate investment bubble bursts, everyone will lose, and that is coming.
One hotel, (between five to seven stories high), which was only three years old, and was housing seventy virus victims, collapsed.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
spf_fishing: I have never taken a celebrity or the media seriously. Some people, unfortunately, do. Luckily a good majority have seemed to notice the truth and turned their backs on the media.
As an example, CNN was busted not long after the Iraq war began, using staged scenes, yet some still followed them. However, those of us who are learned in world government history know the truth about the media establishment and who controls it.
Here is some British history about the BBC and a British film studio. Reference the books titled "Colonel Z, The Secret Life Of A Master Of Spies," by Read and Fisher, and "House of Spies: St Ermin's Hotel, the London Base of British Espionage," by Matthews. The Z Organization (ran by Col. Claude Dansey), which was an arm of MI6, the BBC, and a new movie studio appeared at the same time, being run from Bush House in London in 1937. The Kemsley Newspaper Group was also used. Jews fleeing Nazi Europe went to work there, and at Hollywood. Many were from the same families that we know of today in the media, especially those who cry the loudest (Reiner et al). Also, notice the Cohen family link below.
In the US, Hearst publishing was used by the government to push their propaganda and that spread to the others and Hollywood. Some of my own family owned the Louisville Courier Journal and did the same. It was no different than Horace Greeley spreading Marx's propaganda in his New York newspaper during the Civil War. Hearst's actions are where the term "yellow-pen journalism" originates.
It was Col. Dansey that helped the US in founding the Bureau of Investigation (later becoming the FBI), the OSS, and the C_A.
Z Orginizaton an "The Secret History of MI6":
"Dansey set up his headquarters in Bush House, on the Aldwych, with business cover as the Export Department of Geoffrey Duveen & Co. One of his first officers, Lieutenant Commander Kenneth Cohen, a retired naval officer who had specialised in torpedo duties (when he may have come to Sinclair’s notice), was a Staff College graduate and spoke good Russian, French and German. In 1937 he was ‘interviewed anonymously by arrangement in my car on The Mall’, by a ‘Mr Mansfield’, who turned out to be Dansey. Cohen afterwards described Dansey as ‘a “copybook” secret service man. Dapper, establishment, Boodles [Club], poker-playing expression, bitterly cynical, but with unlimited and illogical charm available, particularly for women’.31 The organisation operated entirely under business cover and Dansey exploited his and Sinclair’s contacts in the business and commercial world to infiltrate and/or enlist people to work for them. Although the idea of a new, and more secure, wing of the Service was, perhaps, sound, the execution of the scheme left something to be desired. Recruitment appears to have been done just as haphazardly as for SIS in general, and training was rudimentary. One officer was engaged straight from Cambridge University, given a short briefing on military requirements and sent to Vienna, ostensibly working for a film company but actually to report on German order of battle and other armed service targets. With no instructions on how to carry out this work and no background to help him with his cover, he simply toured Germany ‘sending back what he noticed, on his travels, of German Army identifications, aircraft, radar and other equipment.'" [sic]
https://erenow.net/modern/the-secret-history-of-mi6/10.php
House of Spies: St Ermin's Hotel, the London Base of British Espionage:
https://books.google.com/books?id=O2NODQAAQBAJ&pg=PT68&lpg=PT68&dq=dansey,+film+studio+at+bush+house&source=bl&ots=vBIP1kpYNA&sig=ACfU3U3_vlyNmBxkQ8SXi3l6v4HAhl24rQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwizr66kjPTmAhXBm-AKHcm4AxUQ6AEwAHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=dansey%2C%20film%20studio%20at%20bush%20house&f=false
3
-
3
-
3
-
George Washington on foreign entanglements:
"Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. ... In the execution of such a plan nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur.
"So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country without odium, sometimes even with popularity, gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.
"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. ...
"Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand, neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the Government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that by such acceptance it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard."
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Warrior of the Light: It is all about China, or the China cabal (China, Russia, Iran, and NK). During the Clinton-Gore campaign, it came out that China was funding their campaign. Under Clinton and Blair, (1997-2001) talks were had, with China, to admit them into the WTO. Just as GW Bush became president, in 2001, China was allowed in, as the talks were supposedly a success. China likes spreading around a lot of money to politicians who promote them, as well as at the UN. The history, though, leads back to the Group of Five, which later became the G7, and that leads to the G20. Look for the politicians, in both nations, who have been promoting China since Clinton and Blair.
"The concept of a forum for the world's major industrialized countries emerged before the 1973 oil crisis. On Sunday, 25 March 1973, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, George Shultz, convened an informal gathering of finance ministers from West Germany Helmut Schmidt, France Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, and the United Kingdom Anthony Barber before an upcoming meeting in Washington, D.C. When running the idea past President Nixon, he noted that he would be out of town and offered use of the White House. The meeting was subsequently held in the library on the ground floor. Taking their name from the setting, this original group of four became known as the "Library Group". In mid-1973, at the World Bank-IMF meetings, Shultz proposed the addition of Japan to the original four nations, who agreed. The informal gathering of senior financial officials from the United States, the United Kingdom, West Germany, Japan, and France became known as the 'Group of Five.'"
Follow the history here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Seven
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_World_Trade_Organization
However, we can now see that China never changed its spots, they actually became worse, and the politicians turned a blind eye to what China has been doing. We were sold out by the progressives, in both parties, and in both nations.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Socialists think that if they ever completely take over, then, it will be a utopia and that they'll be a gear in the governmental red machine. Those are the very ones that have ended up in the gulags performing compulsory (slave) labor, standing with their back turned before a basement wall, or standing in front of a freshly dug pit.
"Hadn't Marx and Engels, in their ten-point program for revolutionary government in The Communist Manifesto, demanded as point eight, "Equal liability for all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture"? Neither Marx nor Engels ever disavowed their claim that those in charge of "the workers' state" had the right to enslave the workers and peasants whenever the need might arise. Now, having annihilated the hated market, the Bolsheviks found that the need for enslavement had, indeed, arisen. And of all the Bolshevik leaders, the most ardent and aggressive advocate of forced labor was Leon Trotsky."_Mises Inst. on Trotsky.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I totally agree with her. She's up against some very dark people, though.
Self-righteous narcissists, an actual psychiatric condition, believe that they are always right, and that everyone else is wrong. Worse, they fully intend on pushing what they believe onto everyone else, regardless of what the majority wants or believes. When they're confronted, first they go defensive, then they attack, and last, they always reverse the role of perpetrator and victim. Sadly, these people have made their way into the political realm, and have been gaining in numbers, which is what the public is now battling against. This is what has led the West to where it's at, today.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
To know the Ayatollahs, the two of them, and the mullahs, is to know who they have been cozy with over the years. Ruhollah Khomeini was ensconced in France, a hub of left-wing radicalism since the 1790s, under a tourist visa. He had ties to terrorists such as those in the MB at Egypt, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, and Yasser Arafat. Both Nazism and Communism there. After the fall of the Soviet Union, it was Russia that helped them with their nuclear and missile programs. It might be a theocracy, but it leans to the hard left and organized crime.
Project Cassandra, which Obama stopped, was investigating Hezbollah's drugs and arms trafficking.
"The Obama administration halted Project Cassandra as it was approaching the upper echelons of Hezbollah's conspiracy in order to seal a nuclear deal with Iran, even though Hezbollah was still funneling cocaine into America."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cassandra
What do you think those plane-loads of cash was used for?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It sounds to me that she see's UK's public in two ways. One, that they're above manual labor, and two, that she wishes to import people for those tasks. That sounds almost like some of the excuses of those many years ago, who were pro-slavery, does it not? As a Yank, this smacks of the old plantation owner's spiels in the south.
I, myself, know better than this, as many want to be blue-collar workers, not white-collar. Many prefer manual labor, ranging from farming, manufacturing, and hospitality. They would gladly accept these jobs if asked.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Brookings has always been a left-wing think tank that has constantly attacked the right. They were behind pushing Watergate years ago. Saying that, the Wilsonians, all radical leftists, eyed Europe wanting to federalize it, which they did, and you have to ask yourself why they wanted that. They have always wanted the UN, which they stated was the League of Nations with more teeth, to end up ruling over all the west, and we can see the truth of that today, especially with the Atlantic Council. That's the "peace dividend brought by EU membership" she speaks of. They want all of Ireland in the EU, and they want to stop Brexit.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It grew much worse when Rhodes came up with the idea of world domination, which was specifically for his elitist clique's monetary gain. This is what ended up as the ideology behind the EU and its ERT. He is correct about 1860 on, but the worst of it came about around 1890. The public has had to deal with the consequences that have their origins at the RIIA and at the CFR since their founding, by the same Rhodes clique and ideology. It has always been, after that time, about a group of elite enriching themselves at the public's expense. This is the origins of the globalist free trade, the migration of manufacturing, and open borders movement of today. These people took over the UK's Foreign Office, and the US State Dept. This led to the creation of organs such as the Atlantic Council, the UN, and the EU, the massive spending, the financial failures, and the bailouts that were placed upon the public's shoulders.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is her attempt at stopping economic growth, so her wealthy industrialist comrades can keep industry in the East.
How many union leaders were caught accepting bribes from the industrialists? The union leaders, then, called for strikes, where industries were shut down by the industrialists, using this as an excuse, then moved to the East where they could use slave labor. Those very industrialists helped the Communist Parties to form by financing their revolutions and hiring activists (much like today). Leon Trotsky was a classic example of an industrialist (London and Wall Street) shill.
During the Great Depression, while the public in the West starved, the industrialists were building huge factories and mills, as well as the energy industry up in the new Soviet Union. When Stalin slipped his leash, they did the same thing in China and elsewhere.
Marx's whole idea was to become wealthy by ruling over the government as a dictator. He was nothing but an organized crime boss who stated that the aristocrats (the wealthy power elite) were the public's "betters." Of course, he considered himself an aristocrat. It has always been about the wealthy keeping control and gaining more wealth at the expense of the public. Communism has always been the scam and tool of the aristocrats.
1
-
When Marx didn't see the Jacobin revolutions take over everywhere, as he predicted, he couldn't believe it either. He also cast blame everywhere but on the movement itself, for a while, until he was finally changed in 1862, though, publicly, he still spieled propaganda.
In 1862, unable to support his family, Marx wrote to Engels:
"Say what you will, dear boy, it really is embarrassing to have to bother you as I do with my miseries! If only I knew how to start some sort of business! All theory, dear friend, is grey, and only business green. Unfortunately, I have come to realize this too late."
He also admitted in 1872 that:
"... we do not deny that there are countries like England and America... where labour may attain its goal by peaceful means."
I think Labour might learn something from those words, as well as the Democrats in the US.
1
-
All politicos, regardless of party, push the agenda of international trade that drives the economy, and that is controlled from behind the scene by the financial and business sectors. They also finance political campaigns. The financial and business sectors are the hidden hand that drives it all, and they have control over the political parties and set the agendas. That is why they are called the power elite. The difference between the party's agendas is about how to spend the profits from tax, etc, within the government, and how to appease their backers.
This is why the intel agencies were formed, and why they are tied to the tax/tariff system, the military, and the port authority, etc. This is also why we have wars. It has always been about obtaining natural resources, the merchants, and their financiers in all political systems, as well as controlling land.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Quoting the founder of the Anti-Federalist/Republican Party in the US, Thomas Jefferson:
"“I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power.”
"“Some are whigs, liberals, democrats, call them what you please. Others are tories, serviles, aristocrats, &c. The latter fear the people, and wish to transfer all power to the higher classes of society; the former consider the people as the safest depository of power in the last resort; they cherish them therefore, and wish to leave in them all the powers to the exercise of which they are competent.”
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.”
"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive."
"The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object."
US History Note: The Old Whigs were the conservative Republicans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How many people have accidentally swallowed a mouthful of chlorinated pool water? You're taking way more into your system that way, than by eating chicken, etc. that was washed. Did that kill you, or cause any ill effects? It is a safe level of chlorine used to kill salmonella, E coli, and Brucella, etc. Chlorinated water, such as swimming pools, can be more dangerous, especially if it sets within the water system, and interacts with other chemicals. The CDC considered 4 ppm chlorine in drinking water safe, and the residue from the chicken wash and rinse is 3 ppm or less.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanabandoim/2020/01/19/uk-plans-to-continue-ban-on-chlorinated-chicken-from-us/#699a1c443905
Those that tout chlorination as something bad, are those from the Green movement. What does that tell you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's funny how they didn't know that the middle-class in the US purchased medical insurance, which paid their medical bills, and many had insurance through their place of employment. If one was poor, there were special charity programs that would pay for it due to the Hill–Burton Act since 1946. Also, if you were poor, no hospital could refuse to treat you in the US. The only people that might have lost out were the miserly, who didn't pay for insurance, but could afford it.
Do they not understand that we, in the US, can select the physician that we want, and find a clinic or help at a moment's notice the way we had it before Obamacare?
Liberals always want something at others' expense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They've never changed. You are now seeing them in their true glory. Their act is over.
The Bloomsbury Group had, and the Fabian Society has always held these beliefs, and, consequently, they have always supported Communism. Go back to the days of Oscar Wilde and his "circle of friends." One of Britain's first spies, Col. Dansey, was from this lot, and it was Dansey who created the shadow intel service, called the Z Organization, in the 30s. It was Dansey who allowed Trotsky to be released from custody in Canada, so he could travel to Petrograd, even though MI5 warned against it. This socialist power elite clique is what has always run Chatham House, and was behind the globalist agenda. It was paralleled in the US under the CFR and the World Federalist Movement.
This is why, under Reagan, the UN was considered a lost cause.
1
-
Let me, a Yank, correct your history just a tad. The China problem started with Nixon, over what his National Security Adviser told him to do. That adviser is from the same elite globalist clique that went after Darren. Every president, except President Trump, from Nixon to Obama, was involved with China and the globalist agenda. That is why Pompeo made the speech at Brussels, below.
Pompeo: Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order
Secretary Pompeo delivers remarks on “Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order,” at the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Brussels, Belgium on December 4, 2018.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTr4cO8LXGA
1
-
1
-
1
-
Gender studies are enlightenment? I call it thought reform and radical programming.
Britain has the same problem as the US, in that its politicians are on the take, and greedy. They were accepted into a major political party, and promoted, because of their greed (Good Ol' Boys Club). It is all about how much money they can bring to a party from donors. That money brings the support of the party. However, those donors, (corporations, etc), expect huge favors down the road. Those favors lead to wars.
Many people, who become politicians, do so for self-enrichment and advancement into the "garden." The power elite's garden is not somewhere a moral person wants to be, as, in the garden, every sin awaits. Who would want to willingly blackmail another, via a multitude of methods, so one can run in the most elite group? At the top is lies and deceit of the type that the public would be most upset over if known. At the top, it is all about money, and how to take it by hook, crook, or steal.
1
-
It seems that Luxemburg has always taken advantage of the other European nations from their railroad scam to laundering and hiding the money of the power elite. The US Treasury, the FED, the IRS, and the DHS are still conducting investigations into European banks involved in money laundering, especially those tied to the Troika Laundromat. I do hope that Juncker et al are sweating. Banks in Latvia, Lithuania, Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland haven't been having a good day.
33 indictments of the Russian Mafia at one go, and 14 members of the Sinaloa drug cartel sung like a bird. Then, there was Epstein.
1
-
@englishciderlover7347 Oh, I agree. At least Nixon had an excuse, anti-communism, which is what that was all about.
Nixon was picked, by Ike, to head the 40 Committee and Op 40, which was the anti-communist operations. He brought that to the WH with him, and began his attack by forming a private intel group. The problem was, he hired a bunch of morons to pull it off, like Liddy.
The night they were caught, the police found the idiots hiding under desks. If they had been cool about it, and stayed in the open, one of them could have just stated, "Well, Langley will be highly upset about this," where the cops would have probably dropped it, and even tried to help cover up the second break-in. Worse, Nixon could have quickly cited "national security," and probably weaseled his way out of it. However, we have idiots serving as politicians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
They want the public divided by race, sex/gender, religion,and politics, and within each, they want them subdivided and labeled. Divided you are weak, but together you are strong. When divided, they can pit one group against another. The public existing as one force is their greatest fear.
I watched the celebration via Ruptly, and they never spoke to anyone, only showing the celebration. It was estimated that 30,000 attended, but there could have been more than that all over London.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
From the Diggers to Babeuf and Robespierre, to the Chartists, the "Communist church," and Robert Owen, to Marx and Engels, and onwards to Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Now, we have Bernie and Corbyn. Only the clinically insane keep doing the same thing, over and over, only to fail every time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Paul: Well, that's pretty darn close, except that the salesman would be a grifter who is lying about what he's selling you (doing a swindle). As an example, he's claiming that he's selling you a two-carat diamond, when it's really a piece of glass, which is the act of the con/fraud.
In the Soviet Union, the party leaders lived in luxury, while the proletariat stood in breadlines. That would be the pyramid scam, where they promised them all a utopia at the start. If they had heard the debates between Lenin and Trotsky, especially about how the Bolsheviks discussed doing away with democracy and bringing in a dictatorship, I believe the people would have sided with the White Russians. Of course, none of that came out until it was too late. A dictatorship was Lenin's idea from the get go. The Mensheviks wanted to bring in democracy once they had control, and everything had settled down, according to Trotsky and others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ceridwen: There will not be any war, except economic, I believe. What he may do is take out leading terrorists, and repay in kind for their attacks. Trump does it by economic warfare.
What is going on, now, is removing the infiltration in the US, especially in academia. It's about intellectual secrets theft, and China's control over secondary education. You can find this on the DOJ News website.
Iran is a little dog in the cabal. The cabal is an alliance between China, Russia, Iran, and NK. There is an Asian union of sorts, the ACD, which is tied to several other Asian economic unions, similar to the EU. China is at the head of it. This four-nation cabal has already been identified in several news articles. It is all tied to one belt and one road, as well as globalism. This is the cabal trying to damage the west, and the corruption is rampant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia_Cooperation_Dialogue
Go back and read the history of the Red-Green-Brown Alliance and the Reform Party. Read what Trump stated about it in 2000, as he tested the waters. It became the far left, the far right, and the environmentalists that made an alliance. This is also the radical group that is doing the political attacks. They tried to form a similar group in the UK, too.
"Trump ultimately withdrew his candidacy. During an appearance on The Today Show, he stated: 'The Reform Party is a total mess! You have Buchanan, a right winger, and you have Fulani, a Communist, and they have merged.... I don't know what you have!.'"__Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Reform_Party_presidential_primaries
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The POTUS' Florida campaign speech in October 2016. Read carefully:
"The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election. As an example, just one single trade deal they'd like to pass involves trillions of dollars controlled by many countries, corporations, and lobbyists.
"For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interests, they partner with these people that don't have your good in mind. Our campaign represents a true existential threat, like they haven't seen before. This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government. The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry. The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, China, and other countries all around the world.
"Our just-announced job numbers are anemic. Our gross domestic product, or GDP, is barely above 1 percent and going down. Workers in the United States are making less than they were almost 20 years ago, and yet they are working harder, but so am I, working harder. That I can tell you. It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.
"Just look at what this corrupt establishment has done to cities like Detroit, and Flint, Michigan, and rural towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, and all across our country. Take a look at what's going on. They've stripped away these towns bare and raided the wealth for themselves and taken our jobs away, out of our country, never to return unless I'm elected president. The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure.
"We've seen this firsthand in the WikiLeaks documents in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends, and her donors.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WildMorgan One could say that, but it was the Nixon administration that brought it about. Nixon was a hidden socialist, a crank environmentalist, and a Quaker. He was also on the take from the mafioso (Hoffa and the Teamsters), but worse, he was on the take, more so, from the Chinese Triads. When he became president, Chinese heroin exploded in the US coming out of Canada from the West Coast, and he targeted the mafioso, who had once controlled that monopoly, and supported the D Party, so the Chinese could take it over. On top of that, he courted Mao, where US manufacturing was offshored, and China now controls the WHO.
You can find the truth about this in a book published by Prof. Alan Block and William Chamblis titled: Organizing Crime (1981), on pages 34 to 39.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1