Comments by "craxd1" (@craxd1) on "Lotuseaters Dot Com"
channel.
-
80
-
63
-
"Manners maketh man." That phrase has its origins from "the work of William Horman who was headmaster of Eton and then Winchester in the late 15th century. Winchester College still retains "manners makyth man" as its motto, as does New College, Oxford, both of which were founded by William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, in the 14th century."
"The Vulgaria, a Latin textbook published in 1519, is considered the most important of Horman's surviving works. It is a collection of English phrases with their Latin translations with a strong leaning towards topics such as manners, religion and natural history. Vulgar is Latin for "common" or "pertaining to the common/ordinary people." Thus vulgaria essentially translates as "common things" or "everyday sayings", as such it's safe to assume that most if not all of the expressions in the book were in common use at the time."
Everyone could learn from this, today, especially the young, who shouldn't want to be seen as common vulgarians.
49
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
One could argue that it has been tried with Robert Owen's New Lanark mill, which is what Engels loved. That was corporate control of everything concerning the worker, and it was a form of enslavement, because it made the worker completely dependent on the factory owner. If you didn't get along, or your output in labor wasn't enough, you could be booted out with nothing but the clothes on your back. You didn't own anything, except for the essentials, such as clothing, which was bought by company script, not government currency.
Sadly, this idea was taken up by the mining industry, for a time, which was what the first labor unions worked so hard to quash.
35
-
The worst of it started three years before 1971, with Alexander King (scientist), in 1968, and the club that he and several others founded, after they gained a following of industrialists and “scientists” from MIT to tout their line. Everything, including the EMF, grew from that. Even the creation of the EU revolves around what was later created over the OEEC and OECD, where King was the Director-General of Scientific Affairs. All of it, CC and sustainability, was a product of King and his minions.
"In 1957, King joined the European Productivity Agency (EPA) as Director in Paris, subsequently becoming Director-General for Scientific Affairs at the OECD. At the OECD, "he initiated the Science Policy Surveys, which took a critical look at the state of science and technology in the OECD countries. Among other things, his initiatives encouraged new forms of education." He retired from the OECD in 1974, taking up the chairmanship of the International Federation of Institutes of Advanced Studies (IFIAS), an organisation based in Stockholm."
33
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
The reason that Sumer is important, is that it is the origin of what became the three monotheisms and their religious myths. Ur was supposedly the home of Abraham. However, just southwest of there is Eridu, which is said to be the origin of the myth of Eden, with Adam (Adapa), and the flood story with Noah (Ziusudra). Some of Sargon's tales, later on, can be matched to Moses as well.
South of there, at Dilmun, or Telmun, was where the myth of Eve supposedly originated.
16
-
16
-
16
-
The Pontic–Caspian steppe was where the Scythians originated, where the horse was first domesticated, and the wheel invented. The Bible mentions them as Gog from Magog, and the Hebrews called them God's Whip. It was said that the Egyptians feared them enough to quickly pay them off in gold when they showed up. It was also said that the most ancient tribes, from the steppe, were absorbed by the Scythians later on.
One can also find their origins mentioned in the tale about the Cyclops and Polyphemus: "the Celts (Galati in Latin, Γάλλοi in Greek) were descended from their son Galatos, while Appian credited them with three children, Celtus, Illyrius and Galas, from whom descend the Celts, the Illyrians, and the Gauls respectively." They spread west and conquered.
15
-
15
-
14
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
Many ancient people, the leaders of their tribes, later, became known as gods, along with natural phenomenon. The ancient king's list, from Sumer, is where Adapa (Adam), from Eridu, was listed as one of the founding seven sages, and one of the early kings, who they also deified. He became the father of us all, in myth.
8
-
7
-
7
-
That was what Jefferson wanted, but it's nowhere within the Constitution. He was a deist, and he knew that the Federalists were religious, with some still beholding to the crown. He also knew that the new gov was set up like Britain's, where they wanted to make Washington a monarch, at first, and entomb him in the basement of the capital building. They even designed the capital building after St Paul's Cathedral in London, and when they were revived under the Whigs, they built the Washington Monument, an obelisk, which all religious buildings have close to them, such as this or a tall column. The monument, in this case, is straight down the Mall, and is almost in line with the WH as well. It has to do with the divine right of kings in the Federalist's view.
It's why Congress still has a chaplain, prayer, and why we swear an oath.
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
How the people are duped into the Soviet or Nazi type of thinking is shown below, and it's sourced from MIT.
"The quote cited [below] does not appear in transcripts of the Nuremberg trials because although Goering spoke these words during the course of the proceedings, he did not offer them at his trial. His comments were made privately to Gustave Gilbert, a German-speaking intelligence officer and psychologist who was granted free access by the Allies to all the prisoners held in the Nuremberg jail. Gilbert kept a journal of his observations of the proceedings and his conversations with the prisoners, which he later published in the book Nuremberg Diary . The quote offered [below] was part of a conversation Gilbert held with a dejected Hermann Goering in his cell on the evening of 18 April 1946, as the trials were halted for a three-day Easter recess:
"Sweating in his cell in the evening, Goering was defensive and deflated and not very happy over the turn the trial was taking. He said that he had no control over the actions or the defense of the others, and that he had never been anti-Semitic himself, had not believed these atrocities, and that several Jews had offered to testify in his behalf. If [Hans] Frank [Governor-General of occupied Poland] had known about atrocities in 1943, he should have come to him and he would have tried to do something about it. He might not have had enough power to change things in 1943, but if somebody had come to him in 1941 or 1942 he could have forced a showdown. (I still did not have the desire at this point to tell him what [SS General Otto] Ohlendorf had said to this: that Goering had been written off as an effective "moderating" influence, because of his drug addiction and corruption.) I pointed out that with his "temperamental utterances," such as preferring the killing of 200 Jews to the destruction of property, he had hardly set himself up as champion of minority rights. Goering protested that too much weight was being put on these temperamental utterances. Furthermore, he made it clear that he was not defending or glorifying Hitler.
"Later in the conversation, Gilbert recorded Goering's observations that the common people can always be manipulated into supporting and fighting wars by their political leaders:
"We got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction.
"'Why, of course, the people don't want war,' Goering shrugged. 'Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.'
"'There is one difference,' I pointed out. 'In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.'
"'Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.'"
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@GodwynDi From when the Constitution was first penned, it was understood by the Federalists, around 1812, that the states could leave the union. That idea lasted until it was getting close to secession in the south, and a war breaking out. It's much like the talk of Texas leaving, today.
“The Constitution does not directly mention secession. The legality of secession was hotly debated in the 19th century. Although the Federalist Party briefly explored New England secession during the War of 1812, secession became associated with Southern states as the North's industrial power increased.”
It's what's called the compact theory, which the Supreme Court said is illegitimate and rejected, because, according to the Constitution, the sovereign is the people, not the states. That is still hotly debated. If the people of those states voted to leave, well...
3
-
3
-
3
-
It's according to which protestant sect. A few of the sects are responsible for socialism and communism in the states, and have been since its founding. That's something that's never discussed, and the problem is always blamed on another religious group, even though they were late-comers to socialism. When that group arrived, as immigrants, the seeds for the socialists were already in place, which started in Boston and spread to NYC. In NYC, the children of the immigrants, (arriving late 1800s and after), who would do anything to make it big, broke away from the religious beliefs of their parents, and joined in with the socialists already there, along with the mob. That was back in the 1920s, or so.
It was only a portion of the immigrants that brought with them the socialism that was spreading across Europe.
Hardliner Calvinism, (the Reformed), is really at the roots of much of what we see as being off, (in the evangelical Anglicans, especially, in the 1800s), as well as sects like the Unitarians, Quakers, and the Hutterites, etc.
Other protestant sects, when visiting, will demand that you stay for supper, and if you need a place to stay, while there, you're invited to.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Vice is generally defined as the immoral or wicked behavior of pleasure or amusement seeking. Many activities fall under this definition from drug and alcohol consumption, prostitution and sex, gaming or gambling, amusements and entertainment, the carnival and circus, and indulgence in fine foods, etc. This is why organized crime took over most of these activities, which is known as the "amusements racket," because people become addicted or overindulge in them, and since many were declared illegal, there is a huge profit in them.
2
-
Did you ever wonder if the activists are as numerous as they are claimed to be by the media and some in gov? Is their movement as really as large as it's made out to be, by some, or is it really only a small percentage of society that's magnified by using propaganda? No, America is far from gone, believe me, as many of us have noticed that the claims of a giant uprising isn't true, and it's only to be found in small pockets. At that, many activists travel in from elsewhere to cause their chaos in the states it's not found in. Now, we've begun asking why that is. I would about bet that you will find a similar thing in Britain.
One can consider the Anglo tribes, the Americans and the British, as two political tribes that are, or were, close to the same that are built upon liberalism, individualism, and capitalism, which are competing against several other tribes of different beliefs around the globe. What the activists seem to hate are the values of these two nations. Ask yourself why. Green-eyed...
TIK has some of the better historical videos about the history of socialism and communism, and they explain much, especially why many left-wing activists are anti-Semitic, since they see the Jews as the fathers of capitalism, liberalism, and individuality, though that's not really true. That hatred was in both Marx and Engels' own words, as well as in the Soviets, and the NSDAP, too. Now, after WWII, think about the differing socialist tribes agreeing to mix their old ideologies together, and trying to bring about a new form of it. The socialists knew, after a while, that the only way to do so was by revolution and lies, because, even then, they didn't have the people to pull it off in much of the west.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Thomas-rv1wi I think it has a different meaning, here, in the US. It's from those that love to hyphenate.
Out of my four grandparents, three surnames are English, and one is French. One of my great-great-grandmothers was a Fuller from Germany, which would have been in the 1860s. Really, in the US, there is a lot of mixture, but mine was predominately English. It's especially so in Virginia and Kentucky, with many.
The four were Mattingly, Bingham, Hackney, and Ramey.
The way I see it, you are what you're born. I would be a North American on one hand, and since the US is made up of fifty states, I am a Kentuckian, due to being born there, with mostly English ancestry. The French in me was from the Huguenots that came here; the Remi family, renamed Ramey.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They had started experimenting with opium, and what became Laudanum, in the sixteenth century. By the time of the Civil War, in the US, they also had Morphine (1820s), but the supply was sometimes low, thus, you got the patient drunk on whiskey before surgery. They also had chloroform at that time, but, again, the supply needed wasn't enough.
"The most influential work [on opium] was by George Young, who published a comprehensive medical text entitled Treatise on Opium (1753). Young, an Edinburgh surgeon and physician, wrote this to counter an essay on opium by his contemporary Charles Alston, professor of botany and materia medica at Edinburgh, who had recommended the use of opium for a wide variety of conditions. Young countered this by emphasising the risks '...that I may prevent such mischief as I can, I here give it as my sincere opinion... that opium is a poison by which great numbers are daily destroyed.' Young gives a comprehensive account of the indications for the drug, including its complications. He is critical about writers whose knowledge of the drug is based on chemical or animal experiments rather than clinical practice. The treatise is a detailed, balanced, and valuable guide to prevailing knowledge and practice. As it gained popularity, opium, and after 1820, morphine, was mixed with a wide variety of agents, drugs, and chemicals including mercury, hashish, cayenne pepper, ether, chloroform, belladonna, whiskey, wine, and brandy."__Wiki on Laudanum.
During the Opium Wars, both the US and UK knew of the practical medical uses of opium, especially the Scots.
The Civil War was what caused the great addiction to opioids, which, eventually, brought about the Harrison Narcotics Act in 1915.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's how Jackie was reared. She was born into a wealthy French Catholic family, and learned the languages that she did from the moment she could talk, where she was taught by her family. She went to a girl's prep school, where they taught them to become a trophy wife, as her family associated with the WASPs.
Furthermore, she started to attend Vassar, but "spent her junior year (1949–1950) in France—at the University of Grenoble in Grenoble, and at the Sorbonne in Paris—in a study-abroad program through Smith College. Upon returning home, she transferred to George Washington University in Washington, D.C., graduating with a Bachelor of Arts degree in French literature in 1951." Her education was lacking, so, "during the early years of her marriage to John F. Kennedy, she took continuing education classes in American history at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C." to catch up.
Back then, trophy wives were "passed on" because of who their families were. Really, it's not much different today in many circumstances.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Greed, envy, and a hatred of one's own life leads one down this road, which is why it has always been traditionally tied to the left in every nation.
One sect of the mob, in the US, and you can guess which one, hated their upbringing and life so much, that they wished to change their names to American-sounding names to hide who they once were. It had nothing to do with needing an alias, but a hatred for their old life.
If you want to find them, just look to what is known as the "amusements racket" since they run the entire thing. That racket includes every vice known to man. Think of everything that can amuse a person, including entertainment. They have their fingers in all of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Supposedly, we're the offspring of Polyphemus and Galatea, or the offspring of the Cyclopes.
"Appian credited them with three children, Celtus, Illyrius and Galas, from whom descend the Celts, the Illyrians and the Gauls respectively." Wiki article on Polyphemus.
The word, Cyclops, it is thought, did not define a person with one eye, but a horse lover. The Yamnaya that spread through Europe domesticated the horse, and rode them.
1