Youtube comments of craxd1 (@craxd1).

  1. 2300
  2. 967
  3. 921
  4. 821
  5. 789
  6. 614
  7. 578
  8. 527
  9. 508
  10. 500
  11. 495
  12. 473
  13. 473
  14. 464
  15. 417
  16. 414
  17. 413
  18. 398
  19. 393
  20. 379
  21. 373
  22. 369
  23. 362
  24. 360
  25. 356
  26. 351
  27. 347
  28. 342
  29. 330
  30. 328
  31. 316
  32. 315
  33. 314
  34. 312
  35. 303
  36. 300
  37. 299
  38. 280
  39. 278
  40. 272
  41. 268
  42. 261
  43. 261
  44. 260
  45. 260
  46. 260
  47. 257
  48. 252
  49. 251
  50. 241
  51. 240
  52. 239
  53. 239
  54. 231
  55. 228
  56. 228
  57. 227
  58. 227
  59. 225
  60. 222
  61. 218
  62. 214
  63. 207
  64. 206
  65. 206
  66. 200
  67. 197
  68. 196
  69. 192
  70. 191
  71. 190
  72. 189
  73. 185
  74. 182
  75. 180
  76. 178
  77. 177
  78. 176
  79. 176
  80. 176
  81. 176
  82. 172
  83. 171
  84. 167
  85. 165
  86. 164
  87. 164
  88. 163
  89. 162
  90. 161
  91. 161
  92. 160
  93. 159
  94. 157
  95. 157
  96. 157
  97. 155
  98. 152
  99. 150
  100. 148
  101. 148
  102. 146
  103. 145
  104. 143
  105. 141
  106. 141
  107. 141
  108. 141
  109. 140
  110. 140
  111. 138
  112. 138
  113. 138
  114. 137
  115. 137
  116. 136
  117. 135
  118. 134
  119. 133
  120. 133
  121. 132
  122. 132
  123. 130
  124. 130
  125. 130
  126. 129
  127. 128
  128. 127
  129. 126
  130. 124
  131. 124
  132. 124
  133. 124
  134. 124
  135. 123
  136. 122
  137. 122
  138. 122
  139. 122
  140. 121
  141. 120
  142. 120
  143. 120
  144. 120
  145. 118
  146. 117
  147. 116
  148. 115
  149. 115
  150. 112
  151. 112
  152. 111
  153. 111
  154. 111
  155. 110
  156. 109
  157. 108
  158. 108
  159. 108
  160. 108
  161. 108
  162. 106
  163. 106
  164. 106
  165. 105
  166. 104
  167. 103
  168. 103
  169. 102
  170. 102
  171. 101
  172. 101
  173. 101
  174. 100
  175. 99
  176. 99
  177. 99
  178. 98
  179. 97
  180. 97
  181. 97
  182. 97
  183. 97
  184. I've tried to weigh what occurred in the Civil War, equally, and by both sides actions. Abolition was, indeed, one thing that was being pushed by the North going back to Jefferson and Randolph. However, many northerners didn't want the slaves there, if released. Liberia was a result of that, and there was talk of shipping them to Panama by Lincoln. Some, in the South, agreed to free them, if they were reimbursed for their cost, like the English did. I read an account by an ex-slave who thought that Lincoln would pay the planters back for their loss. He was mistaken, and that led to the bankruptcy of many post-war planters, who had huge sums invested, and had borrowed that money from the northern elite. However, one wonders how many planters, especially from the large 1,000+ acre plantations, were sincere about this. It was stated, though, that slavery cost them more than hiring “free labor” from the general population. There is also much truth to the South's claims about states' rights, high tariffs, and taxes. So, it wasn't just about slavery. The south could obtain better deals by purchasing imports, such as iron and steel from Britain. The tariffs stopped that. The burning and looting that was allowed, by the North in the South, though, was reprehensible, as were some of the things that occurred in the south during reconstruction. However, look at what occurred about quashing liberty and civil rights in the North, during the war. In the end, it was, as with every other war, economics and money that was at the root of it.
    97
  185. 96
  186. 96
  187. 94
  188. 94
  189. 94
  190. 93
  191. 93
  192. 92
  193. 92
  194. 92
  195. 92
  196. 92
  197. 91
  198. 91
  199. 91
  200. 90
  201. 90
  202. 89
  203. 89
  204. 89
  205. 89
  206. 88
  207. 88
  208. 87
  209. 87
  210. 87
  211. 87
  212. 87
  213. 86
  214. 85
  215. 85
  216. 84
  217. 84
  218. 84
  219. 84
  220. 84
  221. 84
  222. 83
  223. 82
  224. 82
  225. 82
  226. 82
  227. 82
  228. 81
  229. 81
  230. 81
  231. 81
  232. 80
  233. 80
  234. 80
  235. 80
  236. 80
  237. 79
  238. 79
  239. 79
  240. 78
  241. 78
  242. 78
  243. 77
  244. 77
  245. 76
  246. 76
  247. 76
  248. 75
  249. 75
  250. 75
  251. 74
  252. 74
  253. 74
  254. 73
  255. 73
  256. 73
  257. 73
  258. 73
  259. 73
  260. 73
  261. 73
  262. 73
  263. 72
  264. 72
  265. 72
  266. 71
  267. 71
  268. 71
  269. 71
  270. 71
  271. 71
  272. 71
  273. 71
  274. 70
  275. 70
  276. 69
  277. 69
  278. 69
  279. 69
  280. 69
  281. 68
  282. 68
  283. 68
  284. 68
  285. 68
  286. 68
  287. 68
  288. 68
  289. 67
  290. 67
  291. 67
  292. 67
  293. 66
  294. 66
  295. 66
  296. 66
  297. 65
  298. 65
  299. 65
  300. 65
  301. 64
  302. 63
  303. 63
  304. 63
  305. 63
  306. 62
  307. 62
  308. 62
  309. 61
  310. 61
  311. 61
  312. 61
  313. 61
  314. 60
  315. 60
  316. 60
  317. 60
  318. 59
  319. 59
  320. 59
  321. 58
  322. 57
  323. 57
  324. 57
  325. 57
  326. 57
  327. 57
  328. 56
  329. 56
  330. 56
  331. 56
  332. 56
  333. 56
  334. 55
  335. 55
  336. 55
  337. 55
  338. 55
  339. 55
  340. 55
  341. 55
  342. 55
  343. 55
  344. 55
  345. 55
  346. 54
  347. 54
  348. 54
  349. 54
  350. 54
  351. 54
  352. 54
  353. 54
  354. 54
  355. 54
  356. 53
  357. 53
  358. 53
  359. 53
  360. 53
  361. 53
  362. 52
  363. 52
  364. 52
  365. 52
  366. 52
  367. 51
  368. 51
  369. 51
  370. 51
  371. 51
  372. 51
  373. 51
  374. 51
  375. 50
  376. 50
  377. 50
  378. 50
  379. 50
  380. 50
  381. 50
  382. 50
  383. 50
  384. 49
  385. 49
  386. 49
  387. 49
  388. 49
  389. 49
  390. 49
  391. 49
  392. 49
  393. 48
  394. 48
  395. 48
  396. 48
  397. 48
  398. 48
  399. 48
  400. 48
  401. 48
  402. 47
  403. 47
  404. 47
  405. 47
  406. 47
  407. 47
  408. 47
  409. 47
  410. 47
  411. 47
  412. 46
  413. 46
  414. 46
  415. 46
  416. 45
  417. 45
  418. 45
  419. 45
  420. 45
  421. 45
  422. 45
  423. 45
  424. 45
  425. 45
  426. 45
  427. 45
  428. 45
  429. 44
  430. 44
  431. 44
  432. 44
  433. 44
  434. 44
  435. 44
  436. 44
  437. 44
  438. 44
  439. 44
  440. 43
  441. 43
  442. 43
  443. 43
  444. 43
  445. 43
  446. 43
  447. 43
  448. 43
  449. 43
  450. 43
  451. 43
  452. 42
  453. 42
  454. 42
  455. 42
  456. 42
  457. 42
  458. 42
  459. 42
  460. 42
  461. 42
  462. 41
  463. 41
  464. 41
  465. 41
  466. 41
  467. 41
  468. 41
  469. 41
  470. 41
  471. 41
  472. 40
  473. 40
  474. 40
  475. 40
  476. 40
  477. 40
  478. 40
  479. 40
  480. 40
  481. 40
  482. 40
  483. 40
  484. 40
  485. 40
  486. 40
  487. 39
  488. 39
  489. 39
  490. 39
  491. 39
  492. 39
  493. 38
  494. 38
  495. 38
  496. 38
  497. 38
  498. 38
  499. 38
  500. 38
  501. 38
  502. 38
  503. 38
  504. 38
  505. 38
  506. 38
  507. The revisionism exploded with the 1619 Project at the NYT, which is the same paper that is still controlled by people that was once known as the Georgetown Set that goes back to the days of Wisner, where it was also known as the Wisner Gang. Guess what alphabet agency that leads to. "After the Second World War a small group of people began meeting on a regular basis. The group, living in Washington, became known as the Georgetown Set or the Wisner Gang. At the first[,] the key members of the group were former members of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)... Most men brought their wives to these gatherings. Members of what was later called the Georgetown Ladies' Social Club." [SIC] "The men shared similar political views. They tended to hold liberal views on domestic issues. These attitudes were developed while they were students in the 1930s. They were also passionate anti-communists. This was the result of the men's experiences during the wa[r]s and the events in Europe that followed the collapse of Nazi Germany in 1945. The vast majority were members of the Democratic Party but [two of them] were both left-wing Republicans. As [one female member] pointed out: "We were liberal anti-Communist, intellectuals, precisely the class and breed that... McCarthy hated and whose careers he wanted to ruin. It was the same old battle: the Republican right versus the Democratic left." [SIC] Now, the above is not quite true when they claimed to be anti-communists. They were anti-Stalinist, and only against "Soviet socialism." Most of them favored Trotskyism, and that's why McCarthy targeted them. This is why the media is pure propaganda today, and it was why the Smith-Mundt Act had been created in 1948, which was then gutted under president 44 during 2012-13.
    38
  508. 38
  509. 38
  510. 38
  511. 37
  512. 37
  513. 37
  514. 37
  515. 37
  516. 37
  517. 37
  518. 37
  519. 37
  520. 36
  521. 36
  522. 36
  523. 36
  524. 36
  525. 36
  526. 36
  527. 36
  528. 36
  529. 36
  530. 36
  531. 36
  532. 35
  533. 35
  534. 35
  535. 35
  536. 35
  537. 35
  538. 35
  539. 35
  540. 35
  541. 35
  542. 35
  543. 34
  544. 34
  545. 34
  546. 34
  547. 34
  548. 34
  549. 34
  550. 34
  551. 34
  552. 34
  553. 34
  554. 34
  555. 34
  556. 34
  557. 34
  558. 34
  559. 34
  560. 34
  561. 34
  562. 33
  563. 33
  564. 33
  565. 33
  566. 33
  567. 33
  568. 33
  569. 33
  570. 33
  571. 33
  572. 33
  573. 33
  574. 33
  575. 32
  576. 32
  577. 32
  578. 32
  579. 32
  580. 32
  581. 32
  582. 32
  583. 32
  584. What was the "secret society" in mention? The Society of the Elect, aka, the Round Table Group and the Cliveden Set, otherwise known as the Anglo-American Establishment. The CFR and RIIA, as well as the UN and EU are their front organs. This is also the origin of Communism in Russia, China, and North Korea, as well as the Nazi Party in Germany. "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens … In 1983/4 I warned of a take-over of world governments being orchestrated by these people. There was an obvious plan to subvert true democracies and selected leaders were not being chosen based upon character but upon their loyalty to an economic system run by the elites and dedicated to preserving their power. All we have now are pseudo-democracies." - Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D. a former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner in an FTW interview "David Rockefeller's newest international cabal [the Trilateral Commission] ... is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States …The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future." -Senator Barry Goldwater, “With No Apologies” 1964 "The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." __Carroll Quigley in his book "Tragedy and Hope" "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I...was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." __Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p.950 "At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York, it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." __Carroll Quigley, pp.951-952 Quigley interview Washington Post: "I learned the Round Table Group was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975)
    32
  585. 32
  586. 32
  587. 32
  588. 32
  589. 32
  590. 32
  591. 32
  592. 31
  593. 31
  594. 31
  595. 31
  596. 31
  597. 31
  598. 31
  599. 31
  600. 31
  601. 31
  602. 31
  603. 31
  604. 31
  605. 31
  606. 31
  607. 31
  608. 31
  609. 31
  610. 31
  611. 31
  612. 31
  613. 30
  614. 30
  615. 30
  616. 30
  617. 30
  618. 30
  619. 30
  620. 30
  621. 30
  622. 30
  623. 30
  624. 30
  625. 30
  626. 30
  627. 30
  628. 30
  629. 30
  630. 30
  631. 29
  632. 29
  633. 29
  634. 29
  635. 29
  636. 29
  637. 29
  638. 29
  639. 29
  640. 28
  641. 28
  642. 28
  643. 28
  644. 28
  645. 28
  646. 28
  647. 28
  648. 28
  649. 28
  650. 28
  651. 28
  652. 28
  653. 28
  654. 28
  655. 28
  656. 28
  657. 28
  658. 28
  659. 28
  660. 28
  661. 28
  662. 28
  663. 28
  664. 28
  665. 28
  666. 28
  667. 28
  668. 28
  669. 27
  670. 27
  671. 27
  672. 27
  673. 27
  674. 27
  675. 27
  676. 27
  677. 27
  678. 27
  679. 27
  680. 27
  681. 27
  682. 27
  683. 27
  684. 27
  685. 27
  686. 27
  687. 27
  688. 27
  689. 27
  690. 27
  691. 27
  692. 27
  693. 26
  694. 26
  695. 26
  696. 26
  697. 26
  698. 26
  699. 26
  700. 26
  701. 26
  702. 26
  703. 26
  704. 26
  705. 26
  706. 26
  707. 26
  708. 26
  709. 26
  710. 26
  711. 26
  712. In the end, Stone's prosecution, as well as everything else that we've witnessed, such as Flynn, the riots, and China over the past four years, leads back to one thing - money, and the amoral and immoral way that it was made at Wall Street, London, and within DC. The farther this president went to reverse the corruption, the harder a handful of the power elite tried to remove him, to stop it. If the "progressives" had their way, the US would no longer be a sovereign nation, and the corrupt would still be selling out the US to China, or to any other rogue nation that would pay them. We would have Wall Street running the government from a roundtable, much like the EU, but with the corrupted UN pulling the strings, while the public lost their natural rights, and every manufacturing job, that's left, would be heading to Asia. All the while, the largest financial scam in history, involving China, would have continued on, as well as perpetual war. . Mike Pompeo made an important speech to the Marshall Fund, at Brussels, where he pretty much told them that the gig was up, the nation-states would come back to rule, and that the corruption would end. It wasn't wishful thinking, it was solid fact. He told them that the "liberal international order" would change its ways, or it would be torn down, and another put in its place. The POTUS formed the D-10 not long back. What this president has done to reform the government, and the nation as a whole, is amazing. It's something that I never thought that I would witness. Fifty years of corruption, in both political parties, and backed by Wall Street and London, is hard to reverse. All of their wining and dining of Mao is being undone.
    26
  713. 25
  714. 25
  715. 25
  716. 25
  717. 25
  718. 25
  719. 25
  720. 25
  721. 25
  722. 25
  723. 25
  724. 25
  725. 25
  726. 25
  727. 25
  728. 25
  729. 25
  730. 25
  731. 25
  732. 25
  733. 25
  734. 25
  735. 25
  736. 25
  737. 25
  738. 25
  739. 25
  740. 25
  741. 25
  742. 25
  743. 24
  744. 24
  745. 24
  746. 24
  747. 24
  748. 24
  749. 24
  750. 24
  751. 24
  752. 24
  753. 24
  754. 24
  755. 24
  756. 24
  757. 24
  758. 24
  759. 24
  760. 24
  761. 24
  762. 24
  763. 24
  764. 24
  765. 24
  766. 24
  767. 24
  768. 24
  769. 24
  770. 24
  771. 24
  772. 24
  773. 24
  774. 23
  775. 23
  776. 23
  777. 23
  778. 23
  779. 23
  780. 23
  781. 23
  782. 23
  783. 23
  784. 23
  785. 23
  786. 23
  787. 23
  788. 23
  789. 23
  790. 23
  791. 23
  792. 23
  793. 23
  794. 23
  795. A "well regulated militia" means a militia controlled by rules, as in a regiment, by forming troops of armed citizens in each state. It has nothing to do with the type of arms, (arms meaning any kind), except that each person was to keep and bear arms. The Federal Govt had no control over that after the Constitution was penned, and this same said government was not supposed to have a standing army. Any army was to be raised by the states, and for defense only. It was the Federalists that pushed for a standing army. During Adams, a Federalist, he purposely placed John Marshall as the CJ on the SC, and that started the downfall of the strict reading of constitutional law. His type of interpretation came back in 1939. "In 1939 the U.S. Supreme Court considered the matter in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174. There, the Court adopted a collective rights approach, determining that Congress could regulate a sawed-off shotgun which moved in interstate commerce under the National Firearms Act of 1934 because the evidence did not suggest that the shotgun "has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia . . . ." The Court then explained that the Framers included the Second Amendment to ensure the effectiveness of the military." Cornell U. Miller could very well be overturned. 2nd Amend.: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The word, "State" in the 2nd Amendment does not describe the Fed. Govt, but one of the individual states under the constitution.
    23
  796. 23
  797. 23
  798. 23
  799. 23
  800. 22
  801. 22
  802. 22
  803. 22
  804. 22
  805. 22
  806. 22
  807. 22
  808. 22
  809. 22
  810. 22
  811. 22
  812. 22
  813. 22
  814. 22
  815. 22
  816. 22
  817. 22
  818. 22
  819. 22
  820. 22
  821. 22
  822. 22
  823. 22
  824. 22
  825. 22
  826. 22
  827. The revisionism exploded with the 1619 Project at the NYT, which is the same paper that is still controlled by people that was once known as the Georgetown Set that goes back to the days of Wisner, where it was also known as the Wisner Gang. Guess what alphabet agency that leads to. "After the Second World War a small group of people began meeting on a regular basis. The group. living in Washington, became known as the Georgetown Set or the Wisner Gang. At the first the key members of the group were former members of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)... Most men brought their wives to these gatherings. Members of what was later called the Georgetown Ladies' Social Club." "The men shared similar political views. They tended to hold liberal views on domestic issues. These attitudes were developed while they were students in the 1930s. They were also passionate anti-communists. This was the result of the men's experiences during the was and the events in Europe that followed the collapse of Nazi Germany in 1945. The vast majority were members of the Democratic Party but [two of them] were both left-wing Republicans. As [one female member] pointed out: "We were liberal anti-Communist, intellectuals, precisely the class and breed that... McCarthy hated and whose careers he wanted to ruin. It was the same old battle: the Republican right versus the Democratic left." Now, the above is not quite true when they claimed to be anti-communists. They were anti-Stalinist, and only against "Soviet socialism." Most of them favored Trotskyism, and that's why McCarthy targeted them. This is why the media is pure propaganda today, and it was why the Smith-Mundt Act had been created in 1948, which was then gutted under president 44 during 2012-13.
    22
  828. 22
  829. 22
  830. 22
  831. 22
  832. 22
  833. 22
  834. 22
  835. 22
  836. Spot on. There was a reason that several Republican Congressmen put forth a bill, twice, to remove the US from the UN, and the UN from US soil during the Trump Administration. The first instance occurred just after President Trump took office. It's about the establishment's corporations. All of this can be traced back to the first Earth Summit, and when the G5 was created under Nixon, though it had been building up since the creation of the Atlantic Charter. This is why the "globalists" are really "internationalists," and "atlanticists." Under Eisenhower's policy, which was kept classified for many years, it directed "spreading democracy" worldwide, by the use of force. That led to every US war, post-WWII, and the government's involvement with its ex-WWII enemies, (the Nazis), as well as the mob, to quash communism in other nations. Nixon, as the VP, hired the cutout, Robert Maheu, and set that ball rolling with Cuba. This was what John and Bobby uncovered, and it's what they had fought against, in agreement with the Old Right, led by Robert A Taft. The Old Right was what President Trump tried to bring back, and that's why the establishment tried to destroy him. The US and British corporations and governments, (the Anglo-American Establishment), have been behind everything that we've seen since then, including the formation of the EU, the NAU, and the AU, as well as one for Africa, and one for South America. One only needs to ponder, for a second, why people such as Escobar, Lehder, and Noriega claimed to be Nazis. That entire swamp started in the Bahamas, during WWII, and we had GHW Bush, a Nixon underling, using an oil company as a front, during the Cuba Project. British and American imperialism never died, they just renamed it.
    22
  837. 22
  838. 22
  839. 22
  840. 22
  841. 22
  842. 21
  843. 21
  844. 21
  845. 21
  846. 21
  847. 21
  848. 21
  849. 21
  850. 21
  851. 21
  852. 21
  853. 21
  854. 21
  855. 21
  856. 21
  857. 21
  858. 21
  859. 21
  860. 21
  861. 21
  862. 21
  863. 21
  864. 21
  865. 21
  866. 21
  867. 21
  868. 21
  869. 21
  870. 21
  871. 21
  872. 21
  873. 21
  874. 21
  875. 21
  876. 21
  877. 21
  878. 21
  879. 21
  880. 21
  881. 21
  882. 21
  883. 20
  884. 20
  885. 20
  886. 20
  887. 20
  888. 20
  889. 20
  890. 20
  891. 20
  892. 20
  893. 20
  894. 20
  895. 20
  896. 20
  897. 20
  898. 20
  899. 20
  900. 20
  901. 20
  902. 20
  903. 20
  904. 20
  905. 20
  906. 20
  907. 20
  908. 20
  909. 20
  910. 20
  911. 20
  912. 19
  913. 19
  914. 19
  915. 19
  916. 19
  917. Could it be over this: "The New International Economic Order (NIEO) is a set of proposals advocated by developing countries to end economic colonialism and dependency through a new interdependent economy. The main NIEO document recognized that the current international economic order "was established at a time when most of the developing countries did not even exist as independent states and which perpetuates inequality." In the spirit of "trade not aid," the NIEO called for changes in trade, industrialization, agricultural production, finance, and transfer of technology. The United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and its accompanying program of action on 1 May 1974." Nixon, who established the G5 and G7 was just leaving, with Ford coming in. Under Nixon was when this was formed, and the first Earth Summit was held. "In 1974, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order along with its accompanying program of action and formalized this sentiment among nation-states. A few months later the UN General Assembly adopted the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States. Since then, there have been many meetings to realize the NIEO. In 2018, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the resolution "Towards a New International Economic Order," which reaffirmed "the need to continue working towards a new international economic order based on the principles of equity, sovereign equality, interdependence, common interest, cooperation and solidarity among all States." How do you obtain permission from "developing" or third-world countries to do this? You appease them and accept their migrants.
    19
  918. 19
  919. 19
  920. 19
  921. 19
  922. 19
  923. 19
  924. 19
  925. 19
  926. 19
  927. 19
  928. 19
  929. 19
  930. 19
  931. 19
  932. 19
  933. 19
  934. 19
  935. 19
  936. 19
  937. 19
  938. 19
  939. 19
  940. 19
  941. 19
  942. 19
  943. 19
  944. 19
  945. 19
  946. 19
  947. 19
  948. 19
  949. 19
  950. 19
  951. 19
  952. 19
  953. 19
  954. 19
  955. 19
  956. 19
  957. 18
  958. 18
  959. 18
  960. 18
  961. 18
  962. 18
  963. 18
  964. 18
  965. 18
  966. 18
  967. 18
  968. 18
  969. 18
  970. 18
  971. 18
  972. 18
  973. 18
  974. 18
  975. 18
  976. 18
  977. 18
  978. 18
  979. 18
  980. 18
  981. 18
  982. 18
  983. 18
  984. 18
  985. 18
  986. 18
  987. 18
  988. 18
  989. 18
  990. 18
  991. 18
  992. 18
  993. 18
  994. 18
  995. 18
  996. 18
  997. 18
  998. 18
  999. 18
  1000. 17
  1001. 17
  1002. 17
  1003. 17
  1004. 17
  1005. 17
  1006. 17
  1007. 17
  1008. 17
  1009. 17
  1010. 17
  1011. 17
  1012. 17
  1013. 17
  1014. 17
  1015. 17
  1016. 17
  1017. 17
  1018. 17
  1019. 17
  1020. 17
  1021. 17
  1022. 17
  1023. 17
  1024. 17
  1025. 17
  1026. 17
  1027. 17
  1028. 17
  1029. 17
  1030. 17
  1031. 17
  1032. 17
  1033. 17
  1034. 17
  1035. 17
  1036. 17
  1037. 17
  1038. 17
  1039. 17
  1040. 17
  1041. 17
  1042. 17
  1043. 17
  1044. 17
  1045. 17
  1046. 17
  1047. 17
  1048. 17
  1049. 17
  1050. 17
  1051. 17
  1052. 17
  1053. 17
  1054. 17
  1055. 17
  1056. 17
  1057. 16
  1058. 16
  1059. 16
  1060. 16
  1061. 16
  1062. 16
  1063. 16
  1064. 16
  1065. 16
  1066. 16
  1067. 16
  1068. 16
  1069. 16
  1070. 16
  1071. 16
  1072. 16
  1073. 16
  1074. 16
  1075. 16
  1076. 16
  1077. 16
  1078. 16
  1079. 16
  1080. "All of the people interviewed “claimed their group consisted of an alternate communal type life style made up of intellectuals who have chosen to live the way they do,” the FBI wrote. “The mothers were all aware that the children had been taken to Florida on a trip,” and said they trusted the two men who had been arrested. "One of the group members told investigators that the group was formed in 1972 “with the idea of responding to people in emergencies,” according to one of the files. “The group gathered information for people or companies” and was initially based out of 1307 4th Street, N.W., in Washington."__Epoch Times The location is very close to Dunbar Highschool in DC. 1972 was when Kissinger had Nixon ask Brezhnev to send the US his "oppressed Jews." Brezhnev opened the gulag doors and sent their finest criminals, the Vor (Russian mafia). Castro copied that action later. It was a time that the US had hard-left, communist, university students protesting Vietnam. Students whose mind had been warped by communists from Germany, Russia, and at home (such as by Herbert Marcuse). Note the mention of "communal type life." Communism is old, and its ideology can be found with the Quakers, Shakers, Mennonites, and Amish, as well as in some Unitarian religious immigrants. Babeuf turned that into a political ideology, the communiste, that Marx expanded upon. Marx and Engels were Babeufians. Its roots lay with the radical Hussites of Bohemia. The perversion was within the Hussite groups, such as the Neo-Adamites.
    16
  1081. 16
  1082. 16
  1083. 16
  1084. 16
  1085. 16
  1086. 16
  1087. 16
  1088. 16
  1089. 16
  1090. 16
  1091. 16
  1092. 16
  1093. 16
  1094. 16
  1095. 16
  1096. 16
  1097. 16
  1098. 16
  1099. 16
  1100. 16
  1101. 16
  1102. 16
  1103. 16
  1104. 16
  1105. 16
  1106. 16
  1107. 16
  1108. 16
  1109. 16
  1110. 16
  1111. 16
  1112. 16
  1113. 16
  1114. 16
  1115. 16
  1116. 16
  1117. 16
  1118. 16
  1119. 16
  1120. 15
  1121. 15
  1122. 15
  1123. 15
  1124. 15
  1125. 15
  1126. 15
  1127. 15
  1128. 15
  1129. 15
  1130. 15
  1131. 15
  1132. 15
  1133. 15
  1134. 15
  1135. 15
  1136. 15
  1137. 15
  1138. 15
  1139. 15
  1140. 15
  1141. 15
  1142. 15
  1143. 15
  1144. 15
  1145. 15
  1146. 15
  1147. 15
  1148. 15
  1149. 15
  1150. 15
  1151. 15
  1152. 15
  1153. 15
  1154. 15
  1155. 15
  1156. 15
  1157. 15
  1158. 15
  1159. 15
  1160. 15
  1161. 15
  1162. 15
  1163. 15
  1164. 15
  1165. 15
  1166. 15
  1167. 15
  1168. 15
  1169. 15
  1170. 15
  1171. 15
  1172. 15
  1173. 15
  1174. 15
  1175. 15
  1176. 15
  1177. 15
  1178. 15
  1179. 15
  1180. 15
  1181. 15
  1182. 15
  1183. 15
  1184. 14
  1185. 14
  1186. 14
  1187. 14
  1188. 14
  1189. 14
  1190. 14
  1191. 14
  1192. 14
  1193. 14
  1194. 14
  1195. 14
  1196. 14
  1197. 14
  1198. 14
  1199. 14
  1200. 14
  1201. 14
  1202. 14
  1203. 14
  1204. 14
  1205. 14
  1206.  @jumblestiltskin1365  The people behind this, are the very ones that were against Brexit, and support the EU. The World Federalist Movement is behind this, and they have been since the end of WWII. Essentially, you're suffering through a new reconstruction era, similar to, and from the same playbook as used by the US Govt at the end of the Civil War. Both North America and Europe are suffering this at the moment. The north targeted the institutions of both religion, and academia in the south, as both were different from the north, where education had begun dumbing itself down. In other words, it's brainwashing. In the south, at SCU (The Citadel), which was a college then, they had the highest requirements for acceptance of any other college in America. One had to know Latin, and have read an entire bookshelf full of Greek classics while in High School to gain admittance. It was only half as strict at Harvard, and the other northern schools by then. Many, from these same southern colleges in the south, had went on to attend Oxford, etc, and they once held the majority in Congress before the war. When the army arrived, they booted out most of the professors and dean at SCU, replacing them with those from the north, and then, they burned the homes of some of those that had once taught Greek literature. In the churches, they brought in what became known as Christian socialism. Remember, Marx had been writing to Lincoln at the time, and Greeley was publishing his screeds in NYC. Columbia U was at the center of it. None of this stuck after they left, but things eventually did change after WWII, especially during the fifties and sixties, which is when this new reconstruction began.
    14
  1207. 14
  1208. 14
  1209. 14
  1210. 14
  1211. 14
  1212. 14
  1213. 14
  1214. 14
  1215. 14
  1216. 14
  1217. 14
  1218. 14
  1219. 14
  1220. 14
  1221. 14
  1222. 14
  1223. 14
  1224. 14
  1225. 14
  1226. 14
  1227. 14
  1228. 14
  1229. 14
  1230. 14
  1231. 14
  1232. 14
  1233. 14
  1234. 14
  1235. 14
  1236. 14
  1237. 14
  1238. 14
  1239. 14
  1240. 14
  1241. 14
  1242. 14
  1243. 14
  1244. 14
  1245. 14
  1246. 14
  1247. 14
  1248. 14
  1249. 14
  1250. 14
  1251. 14
  1252. 14
  1253. 14
  1254. 14
  1255. 14
  1256. 14
  1257. 14
  1258. 14
  1259. 14
  1260. 14
  1261. 14
  1262. 14
  1263. 14
  1264. 14
  1265. 14
  1266. 14
  1267. 14
  1268. 13
  1269. 13
  1270. 13
  1271. 13
  1272. 13
  1273. 13
  1274. 13
  1275. 13
  1276. 13
  1277. 13
  1278. 13
  1279. 13
  1280. It all boils down to a small percentage of the society, mainly the very wealthy internationalists, who wish to open up the entire world for profit, for which they also intend on controlling. Some want to go so far as to revert society back to what it was at the start of the industrial revolution, to make everyone "equal," except the small minority of wealthy corporate aristocrats who wish to rule it all. This lot of wealthy internationalists wants no differing cultures, no competition, no borders, no religion, no individuality, and for everyone to think alike, becoming a totally amoral society, with a belief in nothing. They want worker drones, or chattle. Below, I quote the first director of the WHO, George Brock Chisholm MD: “The re-interpretation and eventually (sic) eradication of the concept of right and wrong, which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith... are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy. The fact is, that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respectable people have escaped from these moral chains and are able to observe and think freely.”_George Brock Chisholm MD, Psych. “Children must be free to think in all directions irrespective of the peculiar ideas of parents who often seal their children's minds with preconceived prejudices and false concepts of past generations. Unless we are very careful, very careful indeed, and very conscientious, there is still great danger that our children may turn out to be the same kind of people we are.”_George Brock Chisholm MD, Psych. “...the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.”_George Brock Chisholm MD, Psych. This is what has been bandied about by the WHO and the UN since its founding, and this is why race and culture, etc, are now being attacked at the universities. They blame the public, not themselves, nor their corporations and governments, for war and prejudice.
    13
  1281. 13
  1282. 13
  1283. 13
  1284. 13
  1285. 13
  1286. 13
  1287. 13
  1288. 13
  1289. 13
  1290. 13
  1291. 13
  1292. 13
  1293. 13
  1294. 13
  1295. 13
  1296. 13
  1297. 13
  1298. 13
  1299. 13
  1300. 13
  1301. 13
  1302. 13
  1303. 13
  1304. 13
  1305. 13
  1306. 13
  1307. 13
  1308. 13
  1309. 13
  1310. 13
  1311. 13
  1312. 13
  1313. 13
  1314. 13
  1315. 13
  1316. 13
  1317. 13
  1318. 13
  1319. 13
  1320. 13
  1321. 13
  1322. 13
  1323. 13
  1324. 13
  1325. 13
  1326. Simon, many of the fallacies have been spread from the church pulpit concerning this in the US, as the group in mention has a stronger religious conviction than do white people in the US. The NOI is one example, and there are certain celebrity pastors guilty of spreading it as well. However, this is becoming better than it was, as their community has started to catch on. There are many whites in the US that end up falling for certain theories as well. As an example, during and after the 2016 election, many were following a certain anon on 8chan, and if one carefully read what this person had to say, you could tell it was a psyop from the D Party, and that it would help a certain female candidate. They even admitted it through two of their posts, which pointed toward her. The D Party, of course, tried to claim that it was from the opposite party, and if it was, it was from the neoconservatives who are leftists. The same goes for the group: Anonymous. Both appeared and were spreading propaganda during Pres. 44's term. This occurred as well with those that became the intolerant rioters, and they were educated, with some being professors. Many, I believe, have caught on that they were played here as well; especially after the election. The US Govt. is not one that I would trust to produce this type of research, as they began using the phrase "conspiracy theory," purposely, to discredit the public during the Warren Commission over the press and certain books that were quickly published. That came out in their own documentation, which was released later on after a congressional committee found that there was a conspiracy behind it in 1979, except they did not know who the others were, though they had several guesses. New documents, which were just released, show that the government's investigative agencies weren't sure even after the original Warren Commission report was released, where a few agencies kept the case open for several years afterward. The documents also stated that the Commission made a mistake in their conclusion. After I dug into why they did not want Pres. 45 in office, I found out that it had international involvement (G7) because he was against the idea of a transatlantic union (Federalism / Atlantic Union) from the start, which would also affect the UN and NATO. We could witness this in his actions after the fact, as well as the foreign involvement. He also renegotiated NAFTA and targeted China and the Paris Agreement. Several prominent think tanks have now published articles about how they hope to reverse course and bring the US back into the want of a transatlantic union.
    13
  1327. 13
  1328. 13
  1329. 13
  1330. 13
  1331. 13
  1332. 13
  1333. 13
  1334. 13
  1335. 13
  1336. 13
  1337. 13
  1338. 13
  1339. 13
  1340. 13
  1341. 13
  1342. 13
  1343. 13
  1344. 13
  1345. 13
  1346. 13
  1347. 13
  1348. 13
  1349. 13
  1350. 13
  1351. 12
  1352. 12
  1353. 12
  1354. 12
  1355. 12
  1356. 12
  1357. 12
  1358. 12
  1359. 12
  1360. 12
  1361. 12
  1362. 12
  1363. 12
  1364. 12
  1365. 12
  1366. 12
  1367. 12
  1368. 12
  1369. 12
  1370. 12
  1371. 12
  1372. 12
  1373. 12
  1374. 12
  1375. 12
  1376. 12
  1377. 12
  1378. 12
  1379. 12
  1380. 12
  1381. 12
  1382. 12
  1383. 12
  1384. 12
  1385. 12
  1386. 12
  1387. 12
  1388. 12
  1389. 12
  1390. 12
  1391. 12
  1392. 12
  1393. 12
  1394. 12
  1395. 12
  1396. 12
  1397. 12
  1398. 12
  1399. 12
  1400. 12
  1401. 12
  1402. 12
  1403. 12
  1404. 12
  1405. 12
  1406. 12
  1407. 12
  1408. 12
  1409. 12
  1410. 12
  1411. 12
  1412. 12
  1413. 12
  1414. 12
  1415. 12
  1416. 12
  1417. 12
  1418. 12
  1419. 12
  1420. 12
  1421. 12
  1422. 12
  1423. 12
  1424. 12
  1425. 12
  1426. 12
  1427. 12
  1428. 12
  1429. 12
  1430. 12
  1431. 12
  1432. 12
  1433. 12
  1434. 12
  1435. 12
  1436. 12
  1437. 12
  1438. 12
  1439. 12
  1440. 12
  1441. 12
  1442. 12
  1443. 12
  1444. 12
  1445. 12
  1446. 12
  1447. 12
  1448. 12
  1449. 12
  1450. 12
  1451. 12
  1452. 12
  1453. 12
  1454. 12
  1455. 11
  1456. 11
  1457. 11
  1458. 11
  1459. 11
  1460. 11
  1461. 11
  1462. 11
  1463. The DNC wants Obamacare to fail. Why? They want it as a single payer system, and that single payer is the US Government. That makes it socialized medicine, which is exactly what they're after. It is another step completed in the Cloward-Pevin Strategy, which the Marxist-Liberals have been pushing for since the 1960s. The rates rising and the insurance companies pulling out, are due to nobody working to pay into it. It is the same reason why Social Security is in the bad shape that it's in. Believe it or not, making people poor and high unemployment, are also a part of the Marxist's strategy. Here is the Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and [Marxist] political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"." Now, you know why the Communist Party USA backed Obama, Sanders, and Hillary Clinton. Take a look at their website, as they admit that they were backing both Sanders and Hillary for 2016.
    11
  1464. 11
  1465. 11
  1466. 11
  1467. 11
  1468. 11
  1469. 11
  1470. 11
  1471. 11
  1472. 11
  1473. 11
  1474. 11
  1475. 11
  1476. 11
  1477. 11
  1478. 11
  1479. 11
  1480. 11
  1481. 11
  1482. 11
  1483. 11
  1484. 11
  1485. 11
  1486. 11
  1487. 11
  1488. 11
  1489. 11
  1490. 11
  1491. 11
  1492. Ask yourself why the super rich favors CRT with the left. If the super rich will not pay tax, then why? CRT is a tool used by the super rich and left to lay the blame for taxes on today's black community. It's also a tool of white shame, which, I might add, hasn't worked, except on the most gullible. The wealthy, especially in the textile and garment industry, along with financing, have always been radical leftists. It's why they were some of the first corporations to offshore in Asia. Leftism is about exploiting nations, people, and their labor, and it has roots within the old planters and cotton. Who was the left's great savior, and their messiah? FDR? If he was so much for the poor, then why was his family not only wealthy, but so were his close friends such as the Astors on both sides of the pond? Why was his administration packed to the ceiling with radicals? Why was he cutting secret deals with the UK before the war, and what did he admit to Churchill about the US joining the war? Weren't they also working with the Rockefellers in NYC? Worse, what was the World Federalist Movement? Wasn't it founded by wealthy leftists from the US and UK? Did they not follow Trotsky's line of thinking? What about the Georgetown Set, which was packed with them, and those that claimed to leave the left for the right, known as the New York Intellectuals, and the Rockefeller Republicans? All Trotskyites? Why was Trotsky in NYC just before the fall of Czarist Russia? The World Federalists want a one-world big brother nanny state. It's what Jefferson warned about.
    11
  1493. 11
  1494. 11
  1495. 11
  1496. 11
  1497. 11
  1498. 11
  1499. 11
  1500. 11
  1501. 11
  1502. 11
  1503. 11
  1504. 11
  1505. 11
  1506. 11
  1507. 11
  1508. 11
  1509. 11
  1510. 11
  1511. 11
  1512. 11
  1513. 11
  1514. 11
  1515. 11
  1516. 11
  1517. Ironically, it was the same caliber of people behind the blaxploitation, who are funding and pushing BLM's movement along. Most BLM members are merely ignorant puppets, (or at least their main membership is, but not their leaders), of a giant destabilization plan being run by the wealthy socialist elite, and their wealthy comrades in the Anglo-American Establishment. These are the same caliber of people, who back in the fifties, recruited R. Williams to bring violence into the peaceful civil rights movement led by MLK, and they were mainly "progressives," or socialists/communists, that were behind it. All they know is hate and violence, just like labor union tactics. There have been so many myths created to cover for the wealthy elite class, and the Whig Party that was created during the last two years of Madison's term as president, which became the GOP, that it's pathetic. They're, in fact, Hamilton's old Federalists rebranded, who wanted a "big brother" and all-controlling government. They had already started dabbling in socialism by Lincoln's time, (with Lincoln, Greeley, and the Roosevelt family admiring and corresponding with Marx), where they left the beliefs of Jeffersonian Republicanism and the "Old Republicans" behind, over greed. They are the same caliber of people (the Neocons) that those who still believe in Jefferson's Old Republicanism have been trying to remove from the GOP. Sadly, many Republican voters are ignorant of this history. There was a reason that 45 admired Jackson, as he was the Old Republicans' favored president. Coincidently, the color that the Old Republicans had selected for their party was orange. By 1900, this was hidden within both political parties as "progressivism," which was nothing but Marxian socialism. The presidents that still upheld Old Republicanism between 1865 and 1900 were killed off, starting with Garfield, and then, McKinley. It had a lot to do with what happened to JFK and Bobby as well, later on. It's being done to sow hate and discontent between the people, and cause chaos much like Lenin and Trotsky caused in 1917 Russia. Trotskyism has much to do with what we're witnessing now, as it was wealthy New York socialists that had backed and financed Trotsky when he was residing in NYC before he left to meet Lenin at Saint Petersburg in Russia. That sewer swirls around Columbia U, and New York.
    11
  1518. 11
  1519. 11
  1520. 11
  1521. 11
  1522. 11
  1523. 11
  1524. 11
  1525. 11
  1526. 11
  1527. 11
  1528. 11
  1529. 11
  1530. 11
  1531. 11
  1532. 11
  1533. 11
  1534. 11
  1535. 11
  1536. 11
  1537. 11
  1538. 11
  1539. 11
  1540. 11
  1541. 11
  1542. 11
  1543. 11
  1544. 11
  1545. 11
  1546. 11
  1547. 11
  1548. 11
  1549. 11
  1550. 11
  1551. 11
  1552. 11
  1553. 11
  1554. 11
  1555. 11
  1556. 11
  1557. 11
  1558. 11
  1559. 11
  1560. 11
  1561. 11
  1562. 11
  1563. 11
  1564. 11
  1565. 11
  1566. 11
  1567. Some of those ancient groups' sacred rites supposedly involved having sex with a horse, and that made its way to Ireland at one time. This would have been with some of the so-called Barbarian tribes. From Giraldus Cambrensis' Topographia Hibernia: “There are some things which, if the exigencies of my account did not demand it, shame would discountenance their being described. But the austere discipline of history spares neither truth nor modesty. There is in the northern and farther part of Ulster, namely Kenelcunill [Tyrconnell], a certain people which is accustomed to consecrate its king with a rite altogether outlandish and abominable. When the whole people of that land has been gathered together in one place, a white mare is brought forward into the middle of the assembly. He who is to be inaugurated, not as chief, but as a beast, not as a king, but as an outlaw, embraces the animal before all, professing himself to be a beast also. The mare is then killed immediately, cut up in pieces, and boiled in water. A bath is prepared for the man afterwards in the same water. He sits in the bath surrounded by all his people, and all, he and they, eat of the meat of the mare which is brought to them. He quaffs and drinks of the broth in which he is bathed, not in any cup, or using his hand, but just dipping his mouth into it round about him. When this unrighteous rite has been carried out, his kingship and dominion has been conferred…” [SIC] In the Middle East, it was more about hierodoulēs or sacred pro####ution. Both, though, are tied to fertility. "In the temples of Ishtar, Astarte, Mâ, Anahita, and Aphrodite, for example, women, often virgins, offered themselves sexually to strangers. Sometimes the temples were staffed by such "sacred pro####utes." Their actions were ritual components of the cult of the goddess in question. In ancient Greece, the word for such women was hierodoulē, or "sacred servant." The term used here, hierodouleia ("sacred service"), refers to the ritual." "The Babylonian evidence indicates that a distinction between cultic and profane sexuality is both ancient and persistent. It is very possible that the distinction became blurred or perhaps even totally obliterated in the minds of most Westerners because in the Hebrew scriptures the term used for the cultic sexual activity of both male and female temple servants—znh, "to pro####ute oneself"—is also used to refer to apostasy (Hos. 2:7, 4:15; Jer. 2:20, 3:6, 3:8; Ez. 16:15, 23:3, 23:19; Is. 57:3). Sexual cultic activity became for the monotheist Yahvists synonymous with abandoning the worship of Yahveh and turning to false gods. Apostasy in the Bible is considered to be the worst of sins, hence terms referring to cultic sexual activity—pro####ution, harlotry, and whoredom —took on extremely negative connotations."__Encyclopedia Sorry about hiding a certain word, but you know that censorship.
    11
  1568. 11
  1569. 11
  1570. 11
  1571. 11
  1572. 11
  1573. 11
  1574. 10
  1575. 10
  1576. 10
  1577. 10
  1578. 10
  1579. 10
  1580. 10
  1581. 10
  1582. 10
  1583. 10
  1584. 10
  1585. 10
  1586. 10
  1587. First, how do you know that all Christians think that Trump is an indecent man? Do you actually know how many people curse, drink, and swarp that attends church? I know a bunch of them, and when speaking of Catholics, sometimes you have to run a priest or bishop out of a bar. Don't come off holier than thou about Trump, as someone may look into your record. The tape was from eleven years ago, and people can change in a week. Trump apologized, so get over it. He even stated that he was ashamed of things that he had done in the past when he started running! Did you forget that too? Luke 6:37-42 37) Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven: 38) Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom. For with the same measure that ye mete withal it shall be measured to you again. 39) And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? shall they not both fall into the ditch? 40) The disciple is not above his master: but every one that is perfect shall be as his master. 41) And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye? 42) Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother's eye.
    10
  1588. 10
  1589. 10
  1590. 10
  1591. 10
  1592. 10
  1593. 10
  1594. 10
  1595. 10
  1596. 10
  1597. 10
  1598. 10
  1599. 10
  1600. 10
  1601. 10
  1602. 10
  1603. 10
  1604. 10
  1605. 10
  1606. 10
  1607. 10
  1608. 10
  1609. 10
  1610. 10
  1611. 10
  1612. 10
  1613. 10
  1614. 10
  1615. 10
  1616. 10
  1617. 10
  1618. 10
  1619. 10
  1620. 10
  1621. 10
  1622. 10
  1623. 10
  1624. 10
  1625. 10
  1626. 10
  1627. 10
  1628. 10
  1629. 10
  1630. 10
  1631. 10
  1632. 10
  1633. 10
  1634. 10
  1635. 10
  1636. 10
  1637. 10
  1638. 10
  1639. 10
  1640. 10
  1641. 10
  1642. 10
  1643. 10
  1644. 10
  1645. 10
  1646. 10
  1647. 10
  1648. 10
  1649. 10
  1650. 10
  1651. 10
  1652. 10
  1653. 10
  1654. 10
  1655. 10
  1656. 10
  1657. 10
  1658. 10
  1659. 10
  1660. 10
  1661. 10
  1662. 10
  1663. 10
  1664. 10
  1665. 10
  1666. 10
  1667. 10
  1668. 10
  1669. 10
  1670. 10
  1671. 10
  1672. 10
  1673. 10
  1674. 10
  1675. 10
  1676. 10
  1677. 10
  1678. 10
  1679. 10
  1680. 10
  1681. 10
  1682. 10
  1683. 10
  1684. 10
  1685. 10
  1686. 10
  1687. 10
  1688. 10
  1689. 10
  1690. 10
  1691. 10
  1692. Oh, you have no idea about how insidious this socialist movement is becoming. Research "institutional corruption." The program, which is tied to "institutional racism," was started at Harvard's law school, and they have brought their psychology department on board, which is filled with activists. They are attacking individualism in law. In other words, if one from within a group commits a crime, then they think the entire group is guilty for not saying anything, nor stopping it. That is the same slippery socialist slope used in Nazi Germany, and the old Soviet Union, which led to genocide. It also creates snitches, as their idea of prosecuting the group, (because they knew but did nothing wrong), is where it starts. In Nazi Germany, they blamed an entire ethnic group, because a few of them were involved in banking and the stock market. Of course, they ignored the people from their own group that were from within those same professions. You see, they blame the entire white race, because a small handful might be racists. Now, they're targeting individual responsibility, as well as looking at using social engineering to force a change. It is these very academics that pleaded to corporate America to work with them. Look for this video, which was held in Cambridge, MA back on October 8, 2009, by a Harvard professor: "Institutional Corruption - Opening Lecture." This is on the lessig channel, as he is the driving force behind this. This has been coming, and has been planned since at least 2009.
    10
  1693. 10
  1694. 10
  1695. 10
  1696. 10
  1697. 10
  1698. 10
  1699. 10
  1700. 10
  1701. 10
  1702. 10
  1703. 10
  1704. 10
  1705. 10
  1706. 10
  1707. 9
  1708. 9
  1709. 9
  1710. 9
  1711. 9
  1712. 9
  1713. 9
  1714. 9
  1715. 9
  1716. 9
  1717. 9
  1718. 9
  1719. The Marxist New Left progressives are anti-religion, and have almost won. That was started by Hillary's Marxist idol, Saul Alinsky, long ago, and it was also put into the Cloward-Piven Strategy, since Alinsky taught Piven at the University of Chicago. It is step seven in their plan. Piven wrote about this strategy working, last year, in the left-wing The Nation magazine, where they originally published their takeover plan in 1966. https://www.thenation.com/article/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty/ The Marxist Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature, and The Nation magazine): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    9
  1720. 9
  1721. 9
  1722. 9
  1723. 9
  1724. 9
  1725. 9
  1726. 9
  1727. 9
  1728. 9
  1729. 9
  1730. 9
  1731. 9
  1732. 9
  1733. 9
  1734. 9
  1735. 9
  1736. 9
  1737. 9
  1738. 9
  1739. 9
  1740. 9
  1741. 9
  1742. 9
  1743. 9
  1744. 9
  1745. 9
  1746. 9
  1747. 9
  1748. 9
  1749. 9
  1750. 9
  1751. 9
  1752. 9
  1753. 9
  1754. 9
  1755. 9
  1756. 9
  1757. 9
  1758. 9
  1759. 9
  1760. 9
  1761. 9
  1762. 9
  1763. 9
  1764. 9
  1765. 9
  1766. 9
  1767. 9
  1768. 9
  1769. 9
  1770. 9
  1771. 9
  1772. 9
  1773. 9
  1774. 9
  1775. 9
  1776. 9
  1777. 9
  1778. 9
  1779. To comprehend what has led us here, one must understand what the allied governments allowed to happen after 1945, which really exploded in the early seventies, and most likely over the "Nixon Shock." Nixon was one of the corrupt involved. Below is a quote from a report by the Belgium government, when they deeply investigated the matter. "To comprehend this nebula, it is necessary to abandon traditional financial or political logic; this is not merely a question of nation, political party, or of ordinary economics... Our conclusion would be that at least over the last twenty years, the economic powers, some of which mafia types, have allied themselves with political forces and organized criminal structures, and reached the 4th stage of money laundering, namely, Absolute Power. It has been specified to us that at the present moment these characters control 50% of the world economy." __Introduction of a Belgian gendarmerie report to a number of senior officials, District of Liege, November 21, 1994. Nebula was the name that the Belgians gave this underworld network. This was tied to the famous Atlas dossier. This is the group that laundered the money, and stashed it away in offshore secrecy jurisdictions, using shell accounts. The US Govt started to finally act against it in June 2017, and by 2020, there was a huge roundup in Central and South America. They hit them to try to reclaim some of that money, which was never taxed. It was stated that as high as $50 trillion had been hidden from taxation. This corruption was in both political parties within the US and UK, as well as in several European nations. The indictments of certain people running blackmail rings were tied to this as well. Think Russian oligarchs.
    9
  1780. 9
  1781. 9
  1782. 9
  1783. 9
  1784. 9
  1785. 9
  1786. 9
  1787. 9
  1788. The left is not classically liberal, and they are far from it. John Locke, the father of liberalism, that of natural rights, was not against religion, and he was not for many of the things that the left proposes. Today's left is made up of Fabian socialists and hard left and right radical socialists, such as Communists and Fascists. The left sees US politics as a socialist government, with the hard left equalling communism, Fabian socialism in the middle, and fascism on the right. The problem is, that the left leaves out what the true Republican Party actually is, which supports classical liberalism, supports the Constitution, is for limited government, and is based on the early political parties of the founding of the nation. The left lies, by calling the Republicans fascists, because the GOP is next to anarchy on the true US political scale, which is that of a very limited government. The left owns fascism, a type of socialism, and they know it. The left is made up of all socialists, and they see the US as European in its form of government, with the political scale of; Communists (left)-Fabian Socialists (center)-Fascists (right). The true Republican Party has never represented that, is not on that scale, and it is the true classically liberal party. In reality, the true US political scale, is the socialists on left end of the scale, with anarchy at the right, and the Republican Party is just left of anarchy (no law at all). We are not a European socialist government and have never been, no matter how the left wishes we were, nor are the leftists liberal.
    9
  1789. 9
  1790. 9
  1791. 9
  1792. 9
  1793. 9
  1794. 9
  1795. 9
  1796. 9
  1797. 9
  1798. 9
  1799. 9
  1800. 9
  1801. 9
  1802. 9
  1803. 9
  1804. 9
  1805. 9
  1806. 9
  1807. 9
  1808. 9
  1809. 9
  1810. 9
  1811. 9
  1812. 9
  1813. 9
  1814. 9
  1815. 9
  1816. 9
  1817. 9
  1818. 9
  1819. 9
  1820. 9
  1821. 9
  1822. 9
  1823. 9
  1824. 9
  1825. 9
  1826. 9
  1827. 9
  1828. 9
  1829. 9
  1830. 9
  1831. 9
  1832. 9
  1833. 9
  1834. 9
  1835. 9
  1836. 9
  1837. 9
  1838. 9
  1839. 9
  1840. 9
  1841. 9
  1842. 9
  1843. 9
  1844. 9
  1845. 9
  1846. 9
  1847. 9
  1848. 9
  1849. 9
  1850. 9
  1851. 8
  1852. 8
  1853. 8
  1854. 8
  1855. 8
  1856. 8
  1857. 8
  1858. 8
  1859. 8
  1860. 8
  1861. 8
  1862. 8
  1863. 8
  1864. 8
  1865. 8
  1866. 8
  1867. 8
  1868. 8
  1869. 8
  1870. 8
  1871. 8
  1872. 8
  1873. 8
  1874. 8
  1875. 8
  1876. 8
  1877. 8
  1878. 8
  1879. 8
  1880. 8
  1881. 8
  1882. 8
  1883. 8
  1884. 8
  1885. 8
  1886. 8
  1887. 8
  1888. 8
  1889.  @asisin2  Jeffersonian Republicanism was all about liberty and freedom, which was the direct antithesis of Hamiltonian Federalism that was pro-big business, pro-central banking, and pro-big brother centralized government. Take a guess at which one grew close to early socialism first. It wasn't Jefferson's Old Republicans. The problem started early on, especially with central-banking, which both Jefferson and Madison were originally against. However, a deal was made between Madison and Hamilton to allow the first to be established, and we've had a downhill slide ever since. The Federalists lost their party, but they joined up with Madison's faction during the last two years of his presidency. This later became the Whig Party, which was led by Clay, and then the GOP under Lincoln. The Jeffersonians became the Democratic Party. However, after reconstruction, more and more started siding with the federalists, and by the late 1800s, when socialism was brought in by the Christian Socialists in the north, the Bourborn Democrats, which was the group that Wilson came from, became full blown federalists. After that, it was in both parties, and a combination of that with socialism became known as progressivism. The GOP tried to change, and between 1910-12, they booted the progressives out. However, by WWII, they began infiltrating it again, and later, they brought about the New Right and Neoconservatism. That is what is being cleaned out of the GOP, again, now. 45 wanted to bring back Jeffersonian Old Republican belief, which is why he favored Jefferson and Jackson. His ideology was really that of the Jacksonian Old Democrats and the anti-war Old Right.
    8
  1890. 8
  1891. 8
  1892. 8
  1893. 8
  1894. 8
  1895. 8
  1896. 8
  1897. 8
  1898. 8
  1899. 8
  1900. 8
  1901. 8
  1902. 8
  1903. 8
  1904. 8
  1905. 8
  1906. 8
  1907. 8
  1908. 8
  1909. 8
  1910. 8
  1911. 8
  1912. 8
  1913. 8
  1914. 8
  1915. 8
  1916. 8
  1917. 8
  1918. 8
  1919. 8
  1920. 8
  1921. 8
  1922. 8
  1923. 8
  1924. 8
  1925. 8
  1926. 8
  1927. 8
  1928. 8
  1929. 8
  1930. 8
  1931. 8
  1932. 8
  1933. 8
  1934. 8
  1935. 8
  1936. 8
  1937. 8
  1938. 8
  1939. 8
  1940. 8
  1941. 8
  1942. 8
  1943. 8
  1944. 8
  1945. 8
  1946. 8
  1947. 8
  1948. 8
  1949. 8
  1950. 8
  1951. 8
  1952. 8
  1953. 8
  1954. 8
  1955. 8
  1956. 8
  1957. 8
  1958. 8
  1959. 8
  1960. 8
  1961. 8
  1962. 8
  1963. 8
  1964. 8
  1965. 8
  1966. 8
  1967. 8
  1968. 8
  1969. 8
  1970. 8
  1971. 8
  1972. 8
  1973. 8
  1974. 8
  1975. 8
  1976. 8
  1977. 8
  1978. Look into the Corwin Amendment in the US, which was offered to the southern states "on March 2, 1861, shortly before the outbreak of the American Civil War." It was introduced by Senator William H. Seward (New York) and Representative Thomas Corwin (Ohio), and it was endorsed by President James Buchanan (Pennsylvania). All northerners. It would have legalized slavery permanently, and barred Congress from making any law or amendment against it in the future. Now, a few states had already seceded by then, so, if it had been all about slavery, as they claim today, then why would the southern states have passed up that opportunity, which would have also stopped the war? The truth is, that Federalism had come back with Henry Clay's Whig Party, and with that was Hamilton's big brother overreaching government, who placed high tariffs on imports to pay off bank bonds, damaging the south, and they brought back national banking. Corruption came with it, and all of this is what led to the nullifications, secession, and war. Slavery was only a small part of it, as by then, some in the south had already freed their slaves. Those of the Federalists' belief in Clays Whigs were also very cozy with the early socialists in Europe, especially Marx, and many scholars have called the Civil War "the time when Lincoln brought the French Revolution to US shores." There was almost war under Jackson over this very thing, where the northern states benefited from everything, and protected manufacturing, while the south suffered, and paid the price. This was why Jackson attacked the national bank. The war was over two political philosophies, that of Jefferson's Republicanism, and that of Hamilton's Federalism. Sen. Randolph of Roanoke Va., who was opposed to slavery, led the "Old Republicans," and they were those of Jefferson, not Clay's Whigs, (who hijacked the name). Randolph said it best about republican values of: “love of peace, hatred of offensive war, jealousy of the state governments toward the general government, a dread of standing armies, a loathing of public debts, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy of the patronage of the President.” That is the difference between fact, and what is being promoted as history these days.
    8
  1979. 8
  1980. 8
  1981. 8
  1982. 8
  1983. 8
  1984. 8
  1985. 8
  1986. 8
  1987. 8
  1988. 8
  1989. 8
  1990. 8
  1991. 8
  1992. 8
  1993. 8
  1994. 8
  1995. 8
  1996. 8
  1997. 8
  1998. 8
  1999. 8
  2000. 8
  2001. 8
  2002. 8
  2003. 8
  2004. 8
  2005. 8
  2006. 8
  2007. 8
  2008. 8
  2009. 8
  2010. 8
  2011. 8
  2012. 8
  2013. 8
  2014. 8
  2015. 8
  2016. 8
  2017. 8
  2018. 8
  2019. 8
  2020. 8
  2021. 8
  2022. 8
  2023. 8
  2024. 8
  2025. 8
  2026. 8
  2027. 8
  2028. 8
  2029. 8
  2030. 8
  2031. 8
  2032. 8
  2033. 8
  2034. 8
  2035. 8
  2036. 8
  2037. 8
  2038. 8
  2039. 8
  2040. 8
  2041. 8
  2042. 8
  2043. 8
  2044. 7
  2045. 7
  2046. 7
  2047. 7
  2048. 7
  2049. 7
  2050. 7
  2051. 7
  2052. 7
  2053. 7
  2054. 7
  2055. 7
  2056. Yes, like we will listen to a Irish druggie, who doesn't know where he defalcated last. He must think that he knows it all, when it concerns US history and politics, but was raised in Ireland, and was strung out for most of that time. Next, we have the Hollywood celebrities (thespians), who are also druggies, that have been in and out of rehab, and most have lavender marriages (especially the ones in that ad). Don't know what a lavender marriage is? Look it up, and you will uncover the truth about Hollywood, and why thespians flock to Hollywood. Yet, they must think that we will listen to them? I would listen to a three year old over them. Because Duke publicly supported Trump, does not make Trump a racist, nor a member of the KKK. However, let us see who is supporting Hillary, Mrs. Warren. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    7
  2057. 7
  2058. 7
  2059. 7
  2060. 7
  2061. Let's see what Colin Powell has stated about Hillary's e-mail scandal: "“Sad thing,” Powell wrote to one confidant, “HRC could have killed this two years ago by merely telling everyone honestly what she had done and not tie me to it.” “I told her staff three times not to try that gambit. I had to throw a mini tantrum at a Hampton’s [sic] party to get their attention. She keeps tripping into these ‘character’ minefields,” Powell lamented. He noted that he had tried to settle the matter by meeting with Clinton aide Cheryl Mills in August." "“They are going to dick up the legitimate and necessary use of emails with friggin record rules. I saw email more like a telephone than a cable machine,” Powell wrote last year to his business partner Jeffrey Leeds. “As long as the stuff is unclassified. I had a secure State.gov machine. Everything HRC touches she kind of screws up with hubris.” "Powell added in a tangential complaint: “I told you about the gig I lost at a University because she so overcharged them they came under heat and couldn’t [pay] any [sic] fees for awhile. I should send her a bill.”" and, “Dumb. She should have done a ‘Full Monty’ at the beginning,” Powell wrote. He added: “I warned her staff three times over the past two years not to try to connect it to me. I am not sure HRC even knew or understood what was going on in the basement.” https://theintercept.com/2016/09/13/colin-powell-emails/ Not only does Powell admit that Hillary screwed up everything that she touches, she trips into other characters, and that she is dumb and can not understand what is going on around her. Now, that is who the Democrats want as our new president.
    7
  2062. 7
  2063. 7
  2064. 7
  2065. 7
  2066. 7
  2067. 7
  2068. 7
  2069. My home state as well. Mitch fell in with the Neoconservatives of the New York Intellectuals, who are all Trotskyites. New York has been the bane of the US since the Declaration was signed, and it is the home of Federalism and Socialism in the US. Both Federalism and Socialism walk hand in hand, especially after the late nineteenth century. Its roots lie with Henry Clay's Whig Party, who were the old Federalists, and a few other left-wing groups, that came back after losing the Federalist Party. They've always supported a big brother government from the days of Hamilton. Greeley ran for president under the Whigs, and his NYC newspaper was famous for printing Marx's screeds. Lincoln was a pen pal of Marx as well, as the Whig Party became the GOP. This is what Rep. Randolph of Roanoke, the leader of the "Old Republicans," warned about. The Civil War was used to stomp out Old Republican thought and bring in Federalism, as well as the first ideas of Socialism, though many within the party, who still held Old Republican beliefs, tried to fight it. From that time, the Roosevelt family were big supporters, and by 1901, Teddy brought us Progressivism, which Wilson also followed, and with them came Socialism. Old Republican thought was mainly with the Democratic Party at the start of the Civil War, but the north sent in the Carpetbaggers to change that during reconstruction. They used thuggery and coercion to do it. They "Federalized" every state. It was being pushed by a few Protestant denominations as well, especially the Episcopalians, who had ties to the UK, and they were known as "Christian Socialists." Thus, it was within the elite Anglo-American Establishment. The main movement started in the 1890s in Boston (Church of the Carpenter and a few others) and moved to New York. There, they founded the Rand School of Social Science, where Trotsky was lecturing before he left to join Lenin, and it was also within Columbia U, where it was taught. By the 1930s, this same lot took in the Frankfurt School professors, and it was led by Dewey. This was the same Dewey that had traveled to Mexico to "prove Trotsky's innocence." The same Trotsky that was a communist. The grads became known as the New York Intellectuals, and they came into the GOP with the Rockefeller Republicans and Nixon to form the Neocons.
    7
  2070. 7
  2071. 7
  2072. 7
  2073. 7
  2074. 7
  2075. 7
  2076. 7
  2077. 7
  2078. 7
  2079. 7
  2080. 7
  2081. 7
  2082. 7
  2083. 7
  2084. 7
  2085. 7
  2086. 7
  2087. 7
  2088. 7
  2089. 7
  2090. 7
  2091. 7
  2092. 7
  2093. 7
  2094. 7
  2095. 7
  2096. 7
  2097. 7
  2098. 7
  2099. 7
  2100. 7
  2101. 7
  2102. 7
  2103. 7
  2104. 7
  2105. 7
  2106. 7
  2107. 7
  2108. 7
  2109. 7
  2110. 7
  2111. 7
  2112. 7
  2113. 7
  2114. 7
  2115. 7
  2116. 7
  2117. 7
  2118. 7
  2119. 7
  2120. 7
  2121. 7
  2122. 7
  2123. 7
  2124. 7
  2125. 7
  2126. 7
  2127. 7
  2128. 7
  2129. 7
  2130. 7
  2131. 7
  2132. 7
  2133. 7
  2134. 7
  2135. 7
  2136. 7
  2137. 7
  2138. 7
  2139. 7
  2140. 7
  2141. 7
  2142. 7
  2143. 7
  2144. 7
  2145. 7
  2146. 7
  2147. 7
  2148. 7
  2149. 7
  2150. 7
  2151. 7
  2152. 7
  2153. 7
  2154. 7
  2155. 7
  2156. 7
  2157. 7
  2158. 7
  2159. 7
  2160. 7
  2161. 7
  2162. 7
  2163. 7
  2164. 7
  2165. 7
  2166. 7
  2167. 7
  2168. 7
  2169. 7
  2170. 7
  2171. 7
  2172. 7
  2173. 7
  2174. 7
  2175. 7
  2176. 7
  2177. 7
  2178. 7
  2179. 7
  2180. 7
  2181. 7
  2182. 7
  2183. 7
  2184. 7
  2185. 7
  2186. 7
  2187. 7
  2188. 7
  2189. 7
  2190. 7
  2191. 7
  2192. 7
  2193. 7
  2194. 7
  2195. 7
  2196. 7
  2197. 7
  2198. 7
  2199. 7
  2200. 7
  2201. 7
  2202. 7
  2203. 7
  2204. 7
  2205. 7
  2206. 7
  2207. 7
  2208. 7
  2209. 7
  2210. 7
  2211. 7
  2212. 7
  2213. 7
  2214. 7
  2215. 7
  2216. 7
  2217. 7
  2218. 7
  2219. 7
  2220. 7
  2221. 7
  2222. 7
  2223. 7
  2224. I wonder if those who find themselves always offended about something know that this indicates that they are mentally ill, it is within about 20% of the population, and that it is akin to pathological paranoia and hyper-empathy? I find those who are always shouting that they're offended, as being offensive, myself. "According to a study by Stony Brook University, about 20 percent of the population is genetically predisposed to empathy — they have highly sensitive brains that respond intensely to both negative and positive stimuli. Their emotional reactions are such that things are a bigger deal to them than the rest of the population, whether it’s a sensitivity to the feelings of others, themselves, or an overall perception of injustice."__Sarah Sloat on February 4, 2016, Inverse Science. Those who are continually offended and have a "high empathy" generally blame others for their failure, but that blame rests only in their own lap. They think that they are somehow entitled to everything, and hate the merit system. Stephen Fry stated it best: "It is now common to hear people say, "I'm rather offended by that," as if that gives them certain rights.It is no more than a whine. It has no meaning, it has no purpose, it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. "I'm offended by that. "Well, so fucking what"? The same 20% of the population claiming to be offended, also claim they're for democracy. That's funny, as the remaining 80%, the majority in the democracy, wish the 20% to shut their traps, recognize that they're not entitled to anything, and move on.
    7
  2225. 7
  2226. 7
  2227. 7
  2228. 7
  2229. 7
  2230. 7
  2231. 7
  2232. 7
  2233. 7
  2234. 7
  2235. 7
  2236. 7
  2237. 7
  2238. 7
  2239. 7
  2240. 7
  2241. 7
  2242. 7
  2243. 7
  2244. 7
  2245. 7
  2246. 7
  2247. 7
  2248. 7
  2249. 7
  2250. 7
  2251. 7
  2252. 7
  2253. 7
  2254. 7
  2255. 7
  2256. 7
  2257. 7
  2258. 7
  2259. 7
  2260. 7
  2261. 7
  2262. 7
  2263. 7
  2264. 7
  2265. 7
  2266. 7
  2267. 7
  2268. 7
  2269. 7
  2270. 7
  2271. 7
  2272. 7
  2273. 7
  2274. 7
  2275. 7
  2276. 7
  2277. 7
  2278. 7
  2279. 6
  2280. 6
  2281. 6
  2282. 6
  2283. 6
  2284. 6
  2285. 6
  2286. 6
  2287. 6
  2288. 6
  2289. 6
  2290. 6
  2291. 6
  2292. 6
  2293. 6
  2294. 6
  2295. 6
  2296. 6
  2297. 6
  2298. 6
  2299. 6
  2300. 6
  2301. 6
  2302. 6
  2303. 6
  2304. 6
  2305. 6
  2306. 6
  2307. 6
  2308. 6
  2309. 6
  2310. 6
  2311. 6
  2312. 6
  2313. 6
  2314. 6
  2315. 6
  2316. 6
  2317. 6
  2318. 6
  2319. 6
  2320. 6
  2321. 6
  2322. 6
  2323. 6
  2324. 6
  2325. 6
  2326. 6
  2327. 6
  2328. 6
  2329. 6
  2330. 6
  2331. 6
  2332. 6
  2333. 6
  2334. 6
  2335. 6
  2336. 6
  2337. 6
  2338. 6
  2339. 6
  2340. 6
  2341. 6
  2342. 6
  2343. 6
  2344. 6
  2345. 6
  2346. 6
  2347. 6
  2348. 6
  2349. 6
  2350. 6
  2351. 6
  2352. 6
  2353. 6
  2354. 6
  2355. 6
  2356. 6
  2357. 6
  2358. 6
  2359. 6
  2360. 6
  2361. 6
  2362. 6
  2363. 6
  2364. 6
  2365. 6
  2366. 6
  2367. 6
  2368. 6
  2369. 6
  2370. 6
  2371. 6
  2372. 6
  2373. 6
  2374. 6
  2375. 6
  2376. 6
  2377. 6
  2378. 6
  2379. 6
  2380. 6
  2381. 6
  2382. 6
  2383. 6
  2384. 6
  2385. 6
  2386. 6
  2387. 6
  2388. 6
  2389. Shhhh, only the wealthy elite are supposed to know about the Maldives. Follow the earth's axial tilt. As that changes, the northern hemisphere warms and cools over a 40,000 year span due to where the sun strikes the earth. It's vice versa for the southern. There are orbital variations as well. Orbital Variations : "Changes in orbital eccentricity affect the Earth-sun distance. Currently, a difference of only 3 percent (5 million kilometers) exists between closest approach (perihelion), which occurs on or about January 3, and furthest departure (aphelion), which occurs on or about July 4. This difference in distance amounts to about a 6 percent increase in incoming solar radiation (insolation) from July to January. The shape of the Earth’s orbit changes from being elliptical (high eccentricity) to being nearly circular (low eccentricity) in a cycle that takes between 90,000 and 100,000 years. When the orbit is highly elliptical, the amount of insolation received at perihelion would be on the order of 20 to 30 percent greater than at aphelion, resulting in a substantially different climate from what we experience today." Obliquity (change in axial tilt) : "As the axial tilt increases, the seasonal contrast increases so that winters are colder and summers are warmer in both hemispheres. Today, the Earth's axis is tilted 23.5 degrees from the plane of its orbit around the sun. But this tilt changes. During a cycle that averages about 40,000 years, the tilt of the axis varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. Because this tilt changes, the seasons as we know them can become exaggerated. More tilt means more severe seasons—warmer summers and colder winters; less tilt means less severe seasons—cooler summers and milder winters. It's the cool summers that are thought to allow snow and ice to last from year-to-year in high latitudes, eventually building up into massive ice sheets. There are positive feedbacks in the climate system as well, because an Earth covered with more snow reflects more of the sun's energy into space, causing additional cooling."__NASA What a wicked web some weave for a power and money grab.
    6
  2390. 6
  2391. 6
  2392. 6
  2393. 6
  2394. 6
  2395. One will never uncover the true origins of the ancient Egyptian civilization via the scholars of the 21st century, nor from much of the 20th, especially after the out of Africa theory became mainstream. No matter what archaeological evidence shows, they have denied it and covered it up. Cairo's main Egyptologist, who is still loafing around the Valley of the Kings, is one of the ring leaders. All culture, in that area, can be traced back to the mountain people of Anatolia and the Caucasus, as well as the Urals. The ruling class came from the cattle herders, whereas the common people came from farming on the plains. The "mountain" is the key to it all, and so are the burial mounds. The mountain became the pyramid. They literally carved out their homes (caves), in the mountains. It also seems that the cattle herders, who would live in the mountains during the fall and winter, but migrate into the plains with their herds during spring and summer, got the gold bug. Gold, made into jewelry, is the "skin of the gods." North of the Caucasus, on the Pontic–Caspian steppe, it seems that the two cultures were literally divided by the Volga and Ural rivers, and the farmers (Arimaspi) liked to slip across to steal the gold from the herders. The herders, here, lived in the Ural mountains to the east, during the fall and winter. (Hint: Tribes were represented, symbolically, by mythical beasts.) Guess who the Griffin/Dragon represented? There was a similar beast for the ruling class in Mesopotamia and Persia, the Anzu and Shirdal. These were the warriors who first made use of the horse and created the first cavalries. They were known as "God's Whip" to those south of Anatolia in the Levant. They were the founders of civilization along the fertile crescent. If you ever wondered where those hidden gold mines of Midas and Soloman were, they were not in Africa, though it does have gold. To find the gold, you "go north." Those, from the north, used to raid the Egyptians and take their gold, though it was their own distant relatives that migrated there to form the Egyptian empire. The Egyptian slaves were a mixture of them and the Africans, which created the "dark-haired" people. The Fertile Crescent became a melting pot. The ruling Egyptian elite used to paint their bodies, which hid their identity. From carving out caves, to cutting stone. The Cyclopeans, who were never one-eyed. The tale of Polyphemus starts here.
    6
  2396. 6
  2397. 6
  2398. 6
  2399. 6
  2400. 6
  2401. 6
  2402. 6
  2403. “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.”__G. Michael Hopf The US is separated between idealists and realists. The left is made up of idealists and has been since the founding of the nation with certain protestant religions. (Jefferson, though, as an example, was a realist and Aristotelian). By the late 1800s, the Christian Socialists around Boston (Church of the Carpenter and the Karl Marx School) started pushing socialism within the church, and they were the first to bring social science to New York, and to a handful of colleges where it spread. Columbia U was the main school where that started under the Episcopalians. Their first social science school (Rand) was where Trotsky settled and lectured before he left on a steamer to join Lenin at Saint Petersburg. They sat back and waited for the fight to start between the left and right of "Lincolnian America," and waited for a time to take over, as they started infiltrating the wealthy elite class. Lincolnian America is the Leviathan spoken of by Hobbes and that was what Hamilton's Federalists wanted from the start, which is what Jefferson and Madison warned about. It was corrupt British mercantilism in the North East, which they renamed the American System. This was mostly kept under heel until the Civil War, where it was finally brought in by Lincoln and the Radical Republicans, who were really Federalists. The Democrat Party was changed via reconstruction, and that led to the Bourbon Democrats that gave us Wilson. They were also pro-big business and banking at the end. Under Wilson came the Fed and income tax, and the Leviathan now controlled both parties. This is what the socialists helped to finally subvert and create a conflict within hoping to take over after the collapse. Hanson is correct, in that the problem is in the wealthy elite and even the upper-middle-class. They look at the rest of the middle-class as uneducated deplorables, and the lower class even worse, but as a useful tool.
    6
  2404. 6
  2405. 6
  2406. 6
  2407. 6
  2408. 6
  2409. 6
  2410. 6
  2411. 6
  2412. 6
  2413. 6
  2414. 6
  2415. 6
  2416. 6
  2417. 6
  2418. 6
  2419. 6
  2420. 6
  2421. 6
  2422. 6
  2423. 6
  2424. 6
  2425. 6
  2426. 6
  2427. 6
  2428. 6
  2429. 6
  2430.  @randomness4989 Below is the history: "In the first year after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, the schools were left very much to their own devices due to the ongoing civil war of 1917-1923. The People's Commissariat for Education directed its attention solely towards introducing political propaganda into the schools and forbidding religious teaching. In the autumn of 1918 the Uniform Labour School Regulations were issued for the RSFSR. From October 1, 1918, all types of schools came under Commissariat for Education and were designated by the name "Uniform Labour School". They were divided into two levels: the first for children from 8 to 13, and the second for children from 14 to 17. During the 8th Party Congress in March 1919, the creation of the new socialist system of education was said[citation needed] to be the major aim of the Soviet government. After that, Soviet school policy underwent numerous radical changes." "The curriculum was changed radically. Independent subjects, such as reading, writing, arithmetic, the mother tongue, foreign languages, history, geography, literature or science were abolished. Instead, school programmes were subdivided into "complex themes", such as 'the life and labour of the family in village and town' for the first year or 'scientific organisation of labour' for the 7th year of education. This system proved a complete failure, however, and in 1928 a new programme completely abandoned the complex themes and resumed instruction in individual subjects." "Soviet education in the 1930s–1950s was inflexible and suppressive. Research and education, in all subjects[10] but especially in the social sciences, was dominated by Marxist-Leninist ideology and supervised by the CPSU. Such domination led to abolition of whole academic disciplines such as genetics. Some scholars were purged as they were proclaimed bourgeois during that period. Most of the abolished branches of learning were rehabilitated later in Soviet history, in the 1960s–1990s (e.g., genetics in October 1964), although many purged scholars were rehabilitated only in post-Soviet times. In addition, many textbooks - such as history ones - were full of ideology and propaganda, and contained factually inaccurate information (see Soviet historiography). The educational system's ideological pressure continued, but in the 1980s, the government's more open policies influenced changes that made the system more flexible. Shortly before the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, schools no longer had to teach subjects from the Marxist-Leninist perspective at all."__Wikipedia on Education in the Soviet Union In the US, FDR did something similar, which was the end of the one-room schoolhouse. Kindergarten, in the US, was established in 1856. "Friedrich Fröbel (1782–1852) opened a 'play and activity' institute in 1837, in the village of Bad Blankenburg, in the principality of Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, Thuringia, as an experimental social experience for children entering school. He renamed his institute Kindergarten (meaning garden of children) on June 28, 1840, reflecting his belief that children should be nurtured and nourished "like plants in a garden". Fröbel introduced an educational environment into his school, in contrast to other earlier infant establishments, and is therefore credited with the creation of kindergartens. Around 1873, Caroline Wiseneder's method for teaching instrumental music to young children was adopted by the national kindergarten movement in Germany."__Wikipedia on Kindergarten "In [Robert] Owen's time some 2,500 people lived at New Lanark, many from the poorhouses of Glasgow and Edinburgh. Although not the grimmest of mills by far, Owen found the conditions unsatisfactory and resolved to improve the workers' lot. He paid particular attention to the needs of the 500 or so children living in the village (one of the tenement blocks is named Nursery Buildings) and working at the mills, and opened the first infants' school in Britain in 1817, although the previous year he had completed the Institute for the Formation of Character."__Wiki on New Lanark "Owen's work at New Lanark continued to have significance in Britain and continental Europe. He was a "pioneer in factory reform, the father of distributive cooperation, and the founder of nursery schools."[6] His schemes for educating his workers included opening an Institute for the Formation of Character at New Lanark in 1818. This and other programmes at New Lanark provided free education from infancy to adulthood."__Wiki on Robert Owen Notice that Owen took them at infancy, while the parents worked the mill. The children were then brought up believing in what was taught as a formation of character. That was really what they did in the Soviet Union until 1928, where it mostly failed, though they still pushed the state first after that.
    6
  2431. 6
  2432. 6
  2433. 6
  2434. 6
  2435. 6
  2436. 6
  2437. 6
  2438. 6
  2439. 6
  2440. 6
  2441. 6
  2442. 6
  2443. 6
  2444. 6
  2445. 6
  2446. 6
  2447. 6
  2448. 6
  2449. 6
  2450. 6
  2451. 6
  2452. 6
  2453. 6
  2454. 6
  2455. 6
  2456. 6
  2457. 6
  2458. 6
  2459. 6
  2460. 6
  2461. 6
  2462. 6
  2463. 6
  2464. 6
  2465. 6
  2466. 6
  2467. 6
  2468. 6
  2469. 6
  2470. 6
  2471. 6
  2472. 6
  2473. 6
  2474. 6
  2475. 6
  2476. 6
  2477. 6
  2478. 6
  2479. 6
  2480. 6
  2481. Truth about slavery: https://theconversation.com/american-slavery-separating-fact-from-myth-79620 By: Daina Ramey Berry, Associate Professor of History and African and African Diaspora Studies, University of Texas at Austin. Was the economy of the US founded on slavery? No. It was minimum in the north, by the time of the revolution, and only 25% of the south ended up with slaves at the end. During the slave trade, only 4% to 6% came to the US; the rest went to the Caribbean and South America. When slavery was made legal, by a British Virginian court over the Casor case, it had been indentured servitude before that, which consisted of people from every nation and race. Indentured servitude and slavery are two different things. Many settlers arrived in North America as indentured servents, willingly and under contract, including British, as that paid for their crossing. Those released from their contract were given land, and they became framers, etc. Anthony Johnson was an indentured servant from Angola, who became a black farmer after his seven years on another farm. He then had his own indentured servants, both white and black. When Casor, an indentured servant of Johnson's, wished to leave to work another farm, Johnson brought the case to the Virginian court. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casor Because the Constitution has the 3/5's clause for the southern states, which was about the number of seats in the House, it does not mean that the nation was built upon the back of slavery. The majority of the population, especially in the north, did not use slavery, thus the economy was based upon other industry, agriculture, and business that did not use it.
    6
  2482. 6
  2483. 6
  2484. 6
  2485. 6
  2486. 6
  2487. 6
  2488. 6
  2489. 6
  2490. 6
  2491. 6
  2492. 6
  2493. 6
  2494. 6
  2495. 6
  2496. 6
  2497. 6
  2498. 6
  2499. 6
  2500. 6
  2501. 6
  2502. 6
  2503. 6
  2504. 6
  2505. 6
  2506. 6
  2507. 6
  2508. 6
  2509. 6
  2510. 6
  2511. 6
  2512. 6
  2513. 6
  2514. 6
  2515. 6
  2516. 6
  2517. 6
  2518. 6
  2519. 6
  2520. 6
  2521. 6
  2522. 6
  2523. 6
  2524. 6
  2525. 6
  2526. 6
  2527. 6
  2528. 6
  2529. 6
  2530. 6
  2531. 6
  2532. 6
  2533. 6
  2534. 6
  2535. 6
  2536. 6
  2537. 6
  2538. 6
  2539. 6
  2540. 6
  2541. 6
  2542. 6
  2543. 6
  2544. 6
  2545. 6
  2546. 6
  2547. 6
  2548. 6
  2549. 6
  2550. 6
  2551. 6
  2552. 6
  2553. 6
  2554. 6
  2555. 6
  2556. 6
  2557. 6
  2558. 6
  2559. 6
  2560. 6
  2561. 6
  2562. 6
  2563. 6
  2564. 6
  2565. 6
  2566. 6
  2567. 6
  2568. 6
  2569. 6
  2570. 6
  2571. 6
  2572. 6
  2573. 6
  2574. 6
  2575. 6
  2576. 6
  2577. 6
  2578. 6
  2579. 6
  2580. Sadly, we've been stuck with one party hidden as two since 1952, and it's time for everyone to wake up to that fact. The public needs to realize that "neoconservatism" emerged in the thirties from within the pro-Soviet progressive D Party, and these "new conservatives" were anti-Stalinist Trotskyites, but still professed a belief in communism/socialism. Ron Paul exposed them in the House back in 2003. The neocons claimed that they were against "Soviet socialism," and broke away to infiltrate the R Party. That is where the likes of Henry Wallace came from, and the movement was thick in New York, where Dewey ran the Republicans. They were known as the "New York Intellectuals," and some of them were straight from the street gangs and mob. Dewey placed Ike and Nixon on the ticket, and backed them, which hurt the front runner, Taft, who was from the old or real conservative coalition, and America First. Taft lost, and the neocons came in with Ike and Nixon. It was they that supported FDR's New Deal socialism, and were behind restoring Wilson's failed League of Nations as the UN. The neocons and neoliberals are the internationalists, who wanted to spread their brand of Trotskyism around the globe. They hid it as spreading "liberal democracy," and they spread it at the end of a gun barrel. Ike's foreign policy paper, which was kept classified for many years, stated what they intended on doing, and they said it was to stop the spread of communism (Soviet socialism in reality). It was nation building while at war, and it started in Korea, which had already been running for two years before the election. Vietnam was next, and then came the other conflicts. The majority of what they did started with Nixon. It was he that formed the EPA and Earth Day, and started not only the green movement, but founded the G5/G7 at the White House, and set up the first Earth Summit to bring about the global warming scam. It was he that courted China. His underling, GHW Bush, signed the US up for their completed plan at Rio in 1992, and Clinton, a neoliberal, signed the UN treaty for it. It's time to clean house.
    6
  2581. 6
  2582. 6
  2583. 6
  2584. 6
  2585. 5
  2586. The Democrats accuse Trump and the GOP of Russia, when the Democrats are ran by Communists and Socialists themselves. Don't believe it? Read below. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." "We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization." "Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large “speaking” fees from Wall Street. But we know this already." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    5
  2587. 5
  2588. 5
  2589. 5
  2590. 5
  2591. 5
  2592. 5
  2593. 5
  2594. 5
  2595. 5
  2596. Elegant Centrist Why would you want to change the earth when we're now back to what is considered baseline normal temperature? Take a look at how much burnt carbon fuel it would take to double the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Many state that there's not enough left on earth. Since it takes doubling the amount to reach what some now estimate to only be a 1 deg C rise, then we are nowhere near what the left claimed would happen (6 deg C). Several in science, who will speak up about this, talk about the flawed "magic multiplier of three". The problem is, they used math based on feedback loops used in electronics to invent the math for this, instead of having the facts about feedback in nature, both positive and negative. There's more negative feedback in nature than positive. The earth is self-regulating, and has floated around +/- 1.5 deg C (+/- 2 to 3 deg F) at times since 8,000 BCE. Their stating that carbon is the sole cause is quite unprovable. Another tale I always hear from the left is, "the ice is melting, I've seen it". Well, of course it is, and has been since 14,000 years ago. There has been a very slow rise in the sea level ever since the ice cap leveled off from its quick melt starting about 8,000 BCE. The problem is, the global warming panic artists, like Gore and his lackeys, are using flawed science, and they ridicule anyone who states the facts about it. Gore wants that carbon tax. The only ones in science who are exposing it as flawed are retired professors, or those who are at the end of their tenure. Others are afraid of losing their tenure over it, or losing government funding.
    5
  2597. 5
  2598. 5
  2599. 5
  2600. 5
  2601. 5
  2602. 5
  2603. 5
  2604. 5
  2605. 5
  2606. 5
  2607. 5
  2608. 5
  2609. 5
  2610. 5
  2611. 5
  2612. 5
  2613. 5
  2614. 5
  2615. 5
  2616. 5
  2617. 5
  2618. 5
  2619. 5
  2620. 5
  2621. 5
  2622. 5
  2623. 5
  2624. 5
  2625. 5
  2626. 5
  2627. 5
  2628. 5
  2629. 5
  2630. 5
  2631. 5
  2632. 5
  2633. 5
  2634. 5
  2635. 5
  2636. 5
  2637. 5
  2638. 5
  2639. 5
  2640. The problem that I have noticed is, that since the turn of the century, the British Gov, and the US, somewhat, have decided to appease those that they are economically dependent on, but then blame the public for all their woes. I've noticed the quips and comments made about this in the BBC's shows portraying the Western Govs since 2000. It was an Englishman, a Prof. King, who came up with the first ideas about needing a “new enemy” to use as a scapegoat in the 1960s, which set that entire ball rolling. Below, I quote some of this group's writing. “The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself—when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing.” “...Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised.” “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.” Their new “scapegoat” became humanity, itself; never the bumbling govs', nor the large corporations'.
    5
  2641. 5
  2642. 5
  2643. 5
  2644. 5
  2645. 5
  2646. 5
  2647. 5
  2648. 5
  2649. 5
  2650. 5
  2651. 5
  2652. 5
  2653. 5
  2654. 5
  2655. 5
  2656. 5
  2657. 5
  2658. 5
  2659. 5
  2660. 5
  2661. 5
  2662. 5
  2663. 5
  2664. 5
  2665. 5
  2666. 5
  2667. 5
  2668. 5
  2669. 5
  2670. 5
  2671. 5
  2672. 5
  2673. 5
  2674. 5
  2675. 5
  2676. 5
  2677. 5
  2678. 5
  2679. 5
  2680. 5
  2681. 5
  2682. 5
  2683. 5
  2684. 5
  2685. 5
  2686. 5
  2687. 5
  2688.  @KopperNeoman  There were two lines of political philosophy with the founders from the day that the Declaration was signed, and they were Jeffersonian Republicanism, which was Aristotelian, and Hamiltonian Federalism, which was Hobbesian. Hamilton wanted a big brother government tied to big business and big banking, which made the states something similar to non-sovereign counties or shires. Of course, this flew in the face of the Constitution. Jefferson's party eventually became the Democratic Party after the split. The federalists, who had lost their party, joined with Madison's lot, where they finally became the Whig Party, and then the GOP under Clay and Lincoln. However, after the reconstruction, and toward the end of the nineteenth century, the Bourbon Democrats arose, which was light federalism, and they were pro-big business and banking. Wilson was from this very lot, and he was playing with socialism as well. "They represented business interests, generally supporting the goals of banking and railroads, but opposed to subsidies for them and were unwilling to protect them from competition." Thus, they were already leaning toward federalism. Jefferson originally believed in a limited compact-type central government, (a pact between the states), state sovereignty, state's rights, no taxes, was anti-central banking, anti-corruption, anti-offensive war, anti-standing army, and pro-liberty, which was exactly opposite of the federalists. However, both he and Madison started siding with the federalists by the last two years of Madison's presidency, which eventually led to the split in the Democratic-Republican Party, where Rep. Randolph of Roanoke led the Old Republicans. He stated this about the original Jeffersonian Republican idea: "Love of peace, hatred of offensive war, jealousy of the state governments toward the general government; a dread of standing armies; a loathing of public debts, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy of the patronage of the President"
    5
  2689. 5
  2690. 5
  2691. 5
  2692. 5
  2693. 5
  2694. 5
  2695. 5
  2696. 5
  2697. 5
  2698. 5
  2699. 5
  2700. 5
  2701. 5
  2702. 5
  2703. 5
  2704. 5
  2705. 5
  2706. 5
  2707.  @illegalopinions4082  It is bold lies told by the leaders of their cult, much like a priest would lie to their laity, and the laity believe every word of it, because it was spoken or written by their idol. What these people do not understand about their leadership is, that their leaders are greedy and immoral internationalists that look to exploit the entire world and its people. Their cult's leadership feeds them a picture of a utopian Eden to strive for, while behind the scene, the leadership takes control, and becomes more wealthy at the expense of everyone else. That has been the history of socialism and utopianism from its earliest roots, going back to the days of Robert Owen, who Engels and Marx obtained their ideas from, along with those like Machiavelli, de Sade, Rousseau, and Saint-Simon. The power elite class still tries to keep their immorality hidden from the public. Carroll Quigley PhD, who taught history to both Clinton and Pelosi at Georgetown, stated that this very power elite class were who the right mistakenly accused of being communists, or bringing about communist plots. He went on to state that the power elite had no compunction of working with the communists, national socialists, fascists, or any other political group, and that they did so all the time. To them, it's all about international trade, world political power, exploitation, and keeping their profit streams flowing. They would not allow morals to stand in their way, and when one looks at their history, they are completely amoral. Sadly, this cult's sheep have been led and lied to by the likes of Robespierre, Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot. All of them were devoid of any morals, and they were dictators looking to become extremely wealthy off the backs of the people, and their friends in the power elite.
    5
  2708. 5
  2709. 5
  2710. 5
  2711. 5
  2712. 5
  2713. 5
  2714. 5
  2715. 5
  2716. 5
  2717. 5
  2718. 5
  2719. 5
  2720. 5
  2721. 5
  2722. 5
  2723. 5
  2724. 5
  2725. 5
  2726. 5
  2727. 5
  2728. 5
  2729. 5
  2730. 5
  2731. 5
  2732. 5
  2733. 5
  2734. 5
  2735. 5
  2736. 5
  2737. 5
  2738. 5
  2739. 5
  2740. 5
  2741. 5
  2742. 5
  2743. 5
  2744. 5
  2745. 5
  2746. 5
  2747. 5
  2748. 5
  2749. 5
  2750. 5
  2751. 5
  2752. 5
  2753. 5
  2754. 5
  2755. 5
  2756. 5
  2757. 5
  2758. 5
  2759. 5
  2760. 5
  2761. 5
  2762. 5
  2763. 5
  2764. 5
  2765. 5
  2766. 5
  2767. 5
  2768. 5
  2769. 5
  2770. 5
  2771. 5
  2772. 5
  2773. 5
  2774. 5
  2775. 5
  2776. 5
  2777. 5
  2778. 5
  2779. 5
  2780. 5
  2781. 5
  2782. 5
  2783. 5
  2784. 5
  2785. 5
  2786. 5
  2787. 5
  2788. 5
  2789. 5
  2790. 5
  2791. 5
  2792. 5
  2793. 5
  2794. 5
  2795. 5
  2796. 5
  2797. 5
  2798. 5
  2799. 5
  2800. 5
  2801. 5
  2802. 5
  2803. 5
  2804. 5
  2805. 5
  2806. 5
  2807. 5
  2808. 5
  2809. There is a reason that the nation state exists, as there are too many ethnicities and cultures, which do not mix well. Some people would rather live in one area over another, with a different culture, and law, as well as being able to flee a nation when it becomes unbearable, if possible, to another. Having said this, there are some true dandies, in the literal sense, within the so-called elite class, especially within university and the foundations/NGOs, that not only want to force the same culture, which they've created, upon everyone, but they are set upon destroying the nation states. They are the internationalists (political) and socialist progressives; both the same beast, really, and in several nations. From the Wiki article on Internationalism (political): "Supporters of internationalism are known as internationalists and generally believe that humans should unite across national, political, cultural, racial, or class boundaries to advance their common interests, or that governments should cooperate because their mutual long-term interests are of greater importance than their short-term disputes. "Internationalism has several interpretations and meanings, but is usually characterized by opposition to nationalism and isolationism; support for international institutions, such as the United Nations; and a cosmopolitan outlook that promotes and respects other cultures and customs." Sovereign states vs. supranational powers balance "In the strict meaning of the word, internationalism is still based on the existence of sovereign state. Its aims are to encourage multilateralism (world leadership not held by any single country) and create some formal and informal interdependence between countries, with some limited supranational powers given to international organisations controlled by those nations via intergovernmental treaties and institutions. "The ideal of many internationalists, among them world citizens, is to go a step further towards democratic globalization by creating a world government. However, this idea is opposed and/or thwarted by other internationalists, who believe any world government body would be inherently too powerful to be trusted, or because they dislike the path taken by supranational entities such as the United Nations or a union of states such as the European Union and fear that a world government inclined towards fascism would emerge from the former. These internationalists are more likely to support a loose world federation in which most power resides with the national governments." End Quote. David Rockefeller bragged about being an internationalist, and stated that he was proud of it in his memoir. Henry Ford was of the same caliber, and thus, today, large foundations and NGOs, such as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the World Federalists, are behind what we are witnessing in the west, and they are heavily influenced by Russia and China. This is truthfully what is behind the curtain, at the World Economic Forum, in Switzerland.
    5
  2810. 5
  2811. 5
  2812. 5
  2813. 5
  2814. 5
  2815. 5
  2816. 5
  2817. 5
  2818. 5
  2819. 5
  2820. 5
  2821. 5
  2822. 5
  2823. 5
  2824. 5
  2825. 5
  2826. 5
  2827. 5
  2828. 5
  2829. 5
  2830. 5
  2831. 5
  2832. 5
  2833. 5
  2834. 5
  2835. 5
  2836. 5
  2837. 5
  2838. 5
  2839. 5
  2840. 5
  2841. 5
  2842. 5
  2843. 5
  2844. 5
  2845. There are several reasons behind it, but the main one is forced integration and acculturation by those still pushing for an Atlantic Union started by Rhodes. I'm pretty sure that you've read Streit's book, Union Now, which was about this very topic. Streit, a socialist, was a Rhodes disciple that was pushing for an eventual world government, which is what the Rhodes Scholarship was started to help along. This was Trotsky's wish as well with international socialism. "In Streit's own words, Atlantic Union, now expanded to include Western Europe, was the first step towards 'total world government:' It [Union Now] proclaimed the need of world government and insisted that no country needed this more urgently than the United States. Streit, who has been a close associate of Communists and socialists all his adult life, has no hostility towards collectivism. He said in Union Now: 'Democracy not only allows mankind to choose freely between capitalism and collectivism, but it includes Marxist governments.' In his pamphlets, Streit asks the question: 'Does the rise of socialism in some Western European democracies prevent our federating with them?' He answers with an emphatic 'No !'" [SIC] "The work for Atlantic Union is being worked towards by the Streit Council." _Wiki on Atlantic Union. Though the World Federalists are pushing for the same thing. I just read an article at the Institute of World Politics titled: Building the Atlantic World, by Tierney Jr. (Dec. 4th, 2020), which stated: "Strausz-Hupe, a native of Austria who would later serve as U.S. Ambassador to five separate posts including NATO, had long held this view in his writings. In 1942, as world war raged throughout the globe, he predicted that “As policy evolves toward several continental systems and technology accentuates the importance of large, contiguous areas, the national state will be a thing of the past” (Geopolitics: The Struggle for Space and Power). "Such a vision, held for centuries by others but never realized in full, still remains a theoretical construct, despite the European Union (1992), several trade groups, and other associated but “fraternal” unities. England’s “Brexit” departure and the move toward centralized regimes in eastern Europe demonstrates [SIC] the tensions that still dominate between national vs. transnational political allegiance. "The 'status quo' remains an alive and powerful intellectual mindset that continues to retard the momentum that 'Atlantic Union' adherents still seek. 'Rome wasn’t built in a day' may serve as a reminder for patience and deliberation, but slogans do not necessarily serve causation." [SIC]
    5
  2846. 5
  2847. 5
  2848. 5
  2849. 5
  2850. 5
  2851. 5
  2852. 5
  2853. 5
  2854. 5
  2855. 5
  2856. 5
  2857. 5
  2858. 5
  2859. 5
  2860. 5
  2861. 5
  2862. 5
  2863. 5
  2864. 5
  2865. 5
  2866. 5
  2867. 5
  2868. 5
  2869. 5
  2870. 5
  2871. 5
  2872. 5
  2873. 5
  2874. 5
  2875. 5
  2876. 5
  2877. 5
  2878. 5
  2879. 5
  2880. 5
  2881. 5
  2882. 5
  2883. 5
  2884. 5
  2885. 5
  2886. 5
  2887. 5
  2888. 5
  2889. 5
  2890. 5
  2891. 5
  2892. 5
  2893. 5
  2894. 5
  2895. 5
  2896. 5
  2897. 5
  2898. 5
  2899. 5
  2900. 5
  2901. 5
  2902. 5
  2903. 5
  2904. 5
  2905. 5
  2906. 5
  2907. 5
  2908. 5
  2909. 5
  2910. 5
  2911. 5
  2912. 5
  2913. 5
  2914. 5
  2915. 5
  2916. 5
  2917. 5
  2918. 5
  2919. 5
  2920. 5
  2921. 5
  2922. 5
  2923. 5
  2924. 5
  2925. 5
  2926. 5
  2927. 5
  2928. 5
  2929. 5
  2930. 5
  2931. 5
  2932. 5
  2933. 5
  2934. 5
  2935. 5
  2936. 5
  2937. 5
  2938. 5
  2939. 5
  2940. 5
  2941. 5
  2942. 5
  2943. 4
  2944. 4
  2945. 4
  2946. 4
  2947. 4
  2948. 4
  2949. 4
  2950. 4
  2951. 4
  2952. 4
  2953. 4
  2954. 4
  2955. 4
  2956. 4
  2957. 4
  2958. 4
  2959. 4
  2960. 4
  2961. 4
  2962. 4
  2963. 4
  2964. 4
  2965. 4
  2966. 4
  2967. 4
  2968. 4
  2969. 4
  2970. 4
  2971. 4
  2972. 4
  2973. 4
  2974. 4
  2975. 4
  2976. 4
  2977. 4
  2978. 4
  2979. 4
  2980. 4
  2981. 4
  2982. 4
  2983. 4
  2984. 4
  2985. 4
  2986. 4
  2987. 4
  2988. 4
  2989. 4
  2990. 4
  2991. 4
  2992. 4
  2993. 4
  2994. 4
  2995. 4
  2996. 4
  2997. 4
  2998. 4
  2999. 4
  3000. 4
  3001. 4
  3002. 4
  3003. 4
  3004. 4
  3005. 4
  3006. 4
  3007. 4
  3008. 4
  3009. 4
  3010. 4
  3011. 4
  3012. 4
  3013. 4
  3014. 4
  3015. 4
  3016. 4
  3017. 4
  3018. 4
  3019. 4
  3020. 4
  3021. 4
  3022. 4
  3023. 4
  3024. 4
  3025. 4
  3026. 4
  3027. 4
  3028. 4
  3029. 4
  3030. 4
  3031. 4
  3032. 4
  3033. 4
  3034. 4
  3035. 4
  3036. 4
  3037. 4
  3038. 4
  3039. 4
  3040. 4
  3041. 4
  3042. 4
  3043. 4
  3044. 4
  3045. 4
  3046. 4
  3047. 4
  3048.  @John-fk5qq  What the progressive Democrats want today, by their own words, is very close to National Socialism. The EU, that the left vehemently defends, sprang up from the Nazi's Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe). Within that was the Kalergi Plan, as it was the Nazis who colluded with the Muslims, (to kill the religious Jews), that formed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. This is what is behind the Muslim migrant invasion today. New Deal, New Age, New Order, New Federalism, New World Order, and neocons and neoliberals (new conservatives and new liberals). This is the progressive Federalist and Federal Reserve movement. The Fed is tied directly to the Bank of International Settlements, which was controlled by the Nazi Party. This same New Order ideology was backed by many in the US, the progressives, as well as the new UN after 1945. Professor Carroll Quigley, of Georgetown U., stated what the politicians had planned in an interview with the New York Times: "I learned the Round Table Group [Cecil Rhodes et al] was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Prof. Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, Article: "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975) The Institute of Pacific Relations, founded by Lionel Curtis in 1925, is very important. Curtis was close to Rhodes and Milner. They were involved with installing Communism in the rest of Asia, using the YMCA as a front. They are the same people who had previously helped to start the Communist Revolution in Russia in 1917, where they also made use of the YMCA. In fact, one could call these people Federalists, and what they did was by design. They installed three brands of socialism around the globe, New Deal, National, and Communism. The "IPR was founded in the spirit of Wilsonianism, an awareness of the United States' new role as a world power after World War I, and a belief that liberal democracy should be promoted throughout the world. To promote greater knowledge of issues, the IPR supported conferences, research projects and publications, and after 1932 published a quarterly journal Pacific Affairs. After World War II, Cold War charges that the IPR was infiltrated with Communists led to Congressional hearings and loss of tax-exempt status." Lionel Curtis is known for leading Milner's Kindergarten, which is the Rhodes/Milner Roundtable.
    4
  3049. 4
  3050. 4
  3051. 4
  3052. 4
  3053. There is only one way to stop an ever expanding government, and that is to allow it to collapse. Truthfully, the US became the head of the snake under Wilson, with he and Roosevelt's progressivism, which was nothing but hard line socialism. They created the League Of Nations to force it upon the world at the end of WWI. One thing that I give Reagan credit for, was that he supposedly wasn't a Trotskyite, (I can't find it in his history), though he was surrounded by them within the GOP. They were the neoconservatives, who had once been Democrats like him, and were anti-Stalinist Trotskyites who were supposedly against "Soviet Socialism," but were still communists. Their roots lie with the "New York Intellectuals," (which I call Kristol's kindergarten), and Nixon had been associated with them in law, politics, the mob, and Wall Street. The Bush family, which were Nixon underlings, were in deep with them, and the UN was their creation in 1945. Reagan had spied on them for the FBI, when he was the president of the Screen Actors Guild, and while in office, he fought the public sector labor unions, which is something a Trotskyite wouldn't do. However, he did buy into some of their economic policy about so-called free trade and deregulation (especially banking). The neocons and neoliberals (globalists) pushed that. Is it any wonder that there were attempts on his life, just as there were on 45 and his family? It was the neocons, in collusion with the neoliberal left and G7 nations, that tried to unseat 45, since nation building, and spreading "liberal democracy," has its roots in Marx and Trotsky's "permanent revolution." Leaving Afghanistan, collaring NATO and the UN, and creating Middle-Eastern peace runs counter to that. Targeting China and Russia with sanctions does as well.
    4
  3054. 4
  3055. 4
  3056. 4
  3057. 4
  3058. 4
  3059. 4
  3060. 4
  3061. 4
  3062. 4
  3063. 4
  3064. 4
  3065. 4
  3066. 4
  3067. 4
  3068. 4
  3069. 4
  3070. 4
  3071. 4
  3072. 4
  3073. 4
  3074. 4
  3075. 4
  3076. 4
  3077. 4
  3078. 4
  3079. Don't you find it odd, that Richard Nixon, who was the US President from 1969 to 74, and was known as mister environment and UN, squawked loudly about the smog in LA, and he wished to appease the hippies. This led to the creation of Earth Day, and the first mention, that I know, of climate change. Of course, the UN had began building it's "global agenda" then, too. You see, Nixon, along with Eisenhower, were two of the UN's great supporters. . Under Nixon, GHW Bush was rising in the ranks of globalism, and was the 10th United States Ambassador to the United Nations. In 74, he became the chair of the RNC and brought in the Neoconservatives with Nixon. In September 1974, after Tricky Dick left office, Bush became the 2nd Chief of the U.S. Liaison Office to the People's Republic of China under Ford. During Nixon was when they started courting Mao to move manufacturing, and pollution, to the east. It started with pollution control on automobiles, and spread to every other industry with the creation of the EPA in 1970, under Nixon. . This kept going until GHW Bush became president. In 1992, at Rio de Janeiro, GHW Bush, with his world allies, sat down at the Earth Summit, and signed the US up for the UN's "sustainable development" agenda, which became the Rio+20. That agenda has continued until today. . When the Clinton-Gore ticket won, two neoliberals, they started preaching about the sky falling with global warming. By the way, they were investigated over campaign financing from China. . The globalist ideology is this. Redistribute wealth to "developing nations," bringing them up to the advanced status, and that will stop wars. Of course, many large corporations made their fortunes from this move by using sweatshop labor in Asia.
    4
  3080. 4
  3081. 4
  3082. 4
  3083. 4
  3084. 4
  3085. 4
  3086. 4
  3087. 4
  3088. 4
  3089. 4
  3090. 4
  3091. 4
  3092. 4
  3093. 4
  3094. 4
  3095. 4
  3096. 4
  3097. 4
  3098. 4
  3099. 4
  3100. 4
  3101. 4
  3102. 4
  3103. 4
  3104. 4
  3105. 4
  3106. 4
  3107. 4
  3108. 4
  3109. 4
  3110. 4
  3111. 4
  3112. 4
  3113. 4
  3114. 4
  3115. 4
  3116. 4
  3117. 4
  3118. 4
  3119. 4
  3120. 4
  3121. I would bet that most everyone that has read her series of books, or watched the movies that came from them, are idealists instead of realists. Idealists are the very people that still grip tightly to religion and cults, which is where radical liberalism formed to start with under the Protestants. They must really lead a hard life over feeling oppressed every day of their lives. In her books, I would argue that Harry was a stiff upper-lip moderate conservative, or more conservative than he let on. The one radical in their group was Hermione, who nobody could really stand to associate with except two of the trio themselves, and here, they felt sorry for her. Hermione obtains a huge dose of reality in the end, but before that, she obtained one with SPEW, even though she tried to deny what the elves tried to explain to her. After all, Harry was seen by them as their great savior, not her. It was Harry that had obtained the loyalty of both Dobby and Kreacher, and that brought the respect of the rest who fought for him at the end with their swinging meat cleavers and butcher knives. All it took was Harry allowing Kreacher to whack Dung on the head with a saucepan, and he became his loyal servant ever since, where he compared Harry to his "poor Master Regulus." It was Harry that was actually good to the elves, and did what they requested when he could. I have read fanfiction about Harry, and what the leftists tried to create from him was awful and totally out of character. The left really does live in a idealist's dream world.
    4
  3122. 4
  3123. 4
  3124. 4
  3125. 4
  3126. 4
  3127. 4
  3128. 4
  3129. 4
  3130. 4
  3131. When physicians claim that an opioid works no better than Tylenol, ask yourself, how many have tried Tylenol for an abscessed tooth, which did not work, and a Dentist had to prescribe Tylenol with Codeine, in order to relieve the moderately severe pain, while they were treated for the infection? Also, palliative care covers more than cancer, especially certain bone and nervous system disorders, which are inoperable, and can only be treated with narcotics. Sadly, there are some physicians who would allow someone to suffer, because they do not want to write a prescription for fear of the DEA. It would be fair to show two physicians on either side of the debate, especially if one is a pain specialist. Pain is relative, and no physician can tell if someone has an addictive personality when they present themselves to be examined. They are placing too much blame on physicians, instead of the drug pushers and gangs. This country has a culture of young adults, who have been allowed to do anything that they wish, with no repercussions, especially experimenting with drugs. They end up on harder drugs to chase that dragon (high), in order to forget the shitty socialist life that their parents are bestowing on them. They are causing those who need pain treatment to do without. Prescriptions for narcotics have been down for a good while. It is the left's open borders allowing those illegal drugs to flow in, that caused the majority of it. Yes, there are some pill mills, but there are not as many as there used to be, by a long shot.
    4
  3132. 4
  3133. 4
  3134. 4
  3135. 4
  3136. 4
  3137. 4
  3138. 4
  3139. 4
  3140. 4
  3141. 4
  3142. 4
  3143. 4
  3144. 4
  3145. 4
  3146. 4
  3147. 4
  3148. 4
  3149. 4
  3150. 4
  3151. 4
  3152. 4
  3153. 4
  3154. 4
  3155. Uranium One is treasonous. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, admitted that about 25% of the Uranium, which was shipped into Canada to be processed, went overseas to Europe and Japan, where it shouldn't have. On top of that, the transport company is the only one with the export license. "Mr. Christensen, 65, noted that despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada. "Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines. "The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of it." https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html It looks to me, that there are many who are in hot water over the deal.
    4
  3156. 4
  3157. 4
  3158. 4
  3159. 4
  3160. 4
  3161. 4
  3162. 4
  3163.  mld  Example: South Carolina Code > Title 16 > Chapter 3 > Article 11 > § 16-3-1040 South Carolina Code 16-3-1040. Threatening life, person or family of public official or public employee; punishment Current as of: 2017 | Check for updates | Other versions (A) It is unlawful for a person knowingly and wilfully to deliver or convey to a public official or to a teacher or principal of an elementary or secondary school any letter or paper, writing, print, missive, document, or electronic communication or verbal or electronic communication which contains a threat to take the life of or to inflict bodily harm upon the public official, teacher, or principal, or members of his immediate family if the threat is directly related to the public official’s, teacher’s, or principal’s professional responsibilities. (B) It is unlawful for a person knowingly and wilfully to deliver or convey to a public employee a letter or paper, writing, print, missive, document, or electronic communication or verbal or electronic communication which contains a threat to take the life of or to inflict bodily harm upon the public employee or members of his immediate family if the threat is directly related to the public employee’s official responsibilities. (C) A person who violates the provisions of subsection (A), upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. (D) A person who violates the provisions of subsection (B), upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days, or both. (E) For purposes of this section: (1) "Public official" means an elected or appointed official of the United States or of this State or of a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of this State. (2) "Public employee" means a person employed by the State, a county, a municipality, a school district, or a political subdivision of this State, except that for purposes of this section, a "public employee" does not include a teacher or principal of an elementary or secondary school. (3) "Immediate family" means the spouse, child, grandchild, mother, father, sister, or brother of the public official, teacher, principal, or public employee. ==== Threatening Behavior Law and Legal Definition Threatening behavior is intentional behavior which would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities fear of injury or harm. It can include acts of aggression such as yelling at a colleague, pounding on desks, slamming doors,blocking or cornering, and sending threatening voice-mails, e-mails, or other written threats. However behavior cannot be considered threatening just because a person finds it offensive or rude. The acts done should be such that a person feels that the accused person will harm them. Threatening behavior is an ingredient of many offences. The precise definition of the term may vary according to the context in which it is used. The following is an example of a case law on threatening behavior: The Michigan Department of Corrections Policy Directive, No. 03.03.105 (June 6, 1994) (Directive) defines "Threatening Behavior" as "Words, actions or other behavior which expresses an intent to injure or physically abuse another person." [Muhammad v. Close, 540 U.S. 749, 753 (U.S. 2004)] ==== Also: https://www.cga.ct.gov/2001/rpt/2001-R-0790.htm
    4
  3164. 4
  3165. 4
  3166. It is well known that Lincoln was a Rosicrucian, and that he and his wife attended seances. However, the connection between him and predicting history by religion is connected to his assassination in the end. Read the books written by Gen. Thomas Maley Harris, as well as what was written by the Catholic priest that Lincoln represented in court before becoming president. Lincoln listened to what the Catholics were spewing from the pulpits to predict what was coming. The Catholics were fanning the flames of war in the south. The Roman Catholic Church had strong connections to the Confederate states and to Jefferson Davis. War funding for the south was laundered through the church from Europe, and the church was used as spies for the Europeans. Samuel Morse, who was a spy for the North, reported much of this to Lincoln. Morse had traveled Europe extensively up to the early 1830s, and knew of their feelings toward the US. Morse stated: ""We must first stop the leak in the ship through which muddy waters from without threaten to sink us." "Surely American Protestants, freemen, have discernment enough to discover beneath them the cloven foot of this subtle foreign heresy. They will see that Popery is now, what it has ever been, a system of the darkest political intrigue and despotism, cloaking itself to avoid attack under the sacred name of religion. They will be deeply impressed with the truth, that Popery is a political as well as a religious system; that in this respect it differs totally from all other sects, from all other forms of religion in the country." In fact, the RCC is what is left of the old Roman Empire, and still sees themselves as the head of it.
    4
  3167. 4
  3168. 4
  3169. 4
  3170. 4
  3171. 4
  3172. 4
  3173. Years ago, during the 60s to 70s, a political scale was published by those that backed the politician, Robert A Taft, and those like him in 1952 (conservative coalition). See this link for that scale: https://i.imgur.com/SXtQDQc.jpg This is called the true political scale. . The public has been fed a lie since the 1952 election, about what Republicanism really is. The lie was conjured up by progressives and the left. The government had even crawled into bed with the NSDAP, and organized crime, after the war. That is well documented. . Robert A Taft was the last true Republican. They called him "Mr. Republican" in Congress. Compare his ideology with that of every Republican up to GW Bush after 1952. The GOP was completely taken over by progressives, just as the Democratic Party was. Progressivism is slow burn socialism, similar to that of the Fabian Society in London. . Taft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Taft . What happened? Dewey was a progressive. He knew that he couldn't win, and Taft was the front runner. Dewey asked Eisenhower to run as a Republican against Taft. Ike was an independent with progressive values. The GOP placed Nixon, another progressive, on the ticket with Ike, and they barely won. Their administration made sure to fan the flames of the UN, another progressive socialist operation. They also backed FDR's New Deal socialism. The same FDR that said he admired Fascism. . Look into Thomas E. Dewey's ties to the Saratoga Springs racetrack, and organized crime in New York. What did John and Bobby know?
    4
  3174. 4
  3175. 4
  3176. 4
  3177. 4
  3178. 4
  3179. 4
  3180. 4
  3181. 4
  3182.  @terrymike7053  "Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism [in Europe] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy." My words in [brackets]. "Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties." That is what the US would have been under Federalism. Jefferson changed that. "Since the end of World War II in 1945, few parties have openly described themselves as fascist, and the term is instead now usually used pejoratively by political opponents. The descriptions neo-fascist or post-fascist are sometimes applied more formally to describe contemporary parties of the far-right with ideologies similar to, or rooted in, 20th-century fascist movements." Philosophical BS follows: "Roderick Stackelberg places fascism—including Nazism, which he says is "a radical variant of fascism"—on the political right by explaining: "The more a person deems absolute equality among all people to be a desirable condition, the further left he or she will be on the ideological spectrum. The more a person considers inequality to be unavoidable or even desirable, the further to the right he or she will be." The problem is, that by nature, inequality exists, and they can't change that. Everybody is different, and that will never change. Below also shows Stackelberg's fallacy: "The "Fascist left" included Michele Bianchi, Giuseppe Bottai, Angelo Oliviero Olivetti, Sergio Panunzio, and Edmondo Rossoni, who were committed to advancing national syndicalism as a replacement for parliamentary liberalism in order to modernize the economy and advance the interests of workers and the common people." Here is the real nuts and bolts of it: "ANI members, including Alfredo Rocco, sought to institute an authoritarian corporatist state to replace the liberal state in Italy while retaining the existing elites... The ANI held ties and influence among conservatives, Catholics and the business community." The above paragraph is what the entire thing is actually about, and it's what we're seeing now. In Italy, some monarchists were also involved. In all, it's main objective was and is a merger between corporations and state. "A number of post-World War II fascist movements described themselves as a "third position" outside the traditional political spectrum. Spanish Falangist leader José Antonio Primo de Rivera said: "Basically the Right stands for the maintenance of an economic structure, albeit an unjust one, while the Left stands for the attempt to subvert that economic structure, even though the subversion thereof would entail the destruction of much that was worthwhile." "George Orwell wrote in 1944 that 'the word 'Fascism' is almost entirely meaningless ... almost any English person would accept 'bully' as a synonym for 'Fascist.'"
    4
  3183. 4
  3184. 4
  3185. 4
  3186. 4
  3187. 4
  3188. 4
  3189. 4
  3190. 4
  3191. 4
  3192. 4
  3193. 4
  3194. 4
  3195. 4
  3196. 4
  3197. 4
  3198. 4
  3199. 4
  3200. 4
  3201. 4
  3202. 4
  3203. 4
  3204. 4
  3205. 4
  3206. 4
  3207. 4
  3208. 4
  3209. 4
  3210. 4
  3211. 4
  3212. 4
  3213. 4
  3214. 4
  3215. 4
  3216. 4
  3217. 4
  3218. 4
  3219. 4
  3220. 4
  3221. 4
  3222. 4
  3223. 4
  3224. 4
  3225. 4
  3226. 4
  3227. 4
  3228. 4
  3229. 4
  3230. 4
  3231. 4
  3232. 4
  3233. 4
  3234. 4
  3235. 4
  3236. 4
  3237. 4
  3238. 4
  3239. 4
  3240. 4
  3241. 4
  3242. 4
  3243. 4
  3244. 4
  3245. 4
  3246. 4
  3247. 4
  3248. 4
  3249. 4
  3250. 4
  3251. 4
  3252. 4
  3253. 4
  3254. 4
  3255. 4
  3256. 4
  3257. 4
  3258. 4
  3259. 4
  3260. 4
  3261. Two words to research: Atlanticism, and Internationalism (politics). The agreements made during WWII leads to it all, as well as the creation of the UN, and what occurred during the Nixon Administration, with the creation of the G5, and the Earth Summits. 1972 - The United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHS) in Stockholm 1982 - The 1982 Earth Summit in Nairobi (Kenya). An Earth Summit was held in Nairobi, Kenya, from 10 to 18 May 1982. The events of the time (Cold War) and the disinterest of US President Ronald Reagan (who appointed his delegated daughter Of the United States) made this summit a failure. It is not even mentioned as an official Earth Summit. 1992 - The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) or Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) [Where over 100 nations signed up for this, becoming Agenda 21] 2002 - The World Summit on Sustainable Development, Earth Summit 2002 or Rio+10, Johannesburg (South Africa) 2009 - 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference or Copenhagen Summit, Copenhagen (Denmark) 2012 - The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) or Rio+20, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) 2018 - The 7th Digital Earth Summit 2018, DES-2018, on Digital Earth for Sustainable Development in Africa was to be held in El Jadida, Morocco, at the Faculty of Science, Chouaib Douakkali University from April 17-19, 2018 2019 - The Santiago Climate Change Conference, featuring the 25th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 25) to the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) and meetings of the UNFCCC subsidiary bodies, will convene from 2nd to 13th of December 2019.
    4
  3262. 4
  3263. 4
  3264. 4
  3265. 4
  3266. 4
  3267. 4
  3268. 4
  3269. 4
  3270. 4
  3271. 4
  3272. 4
  3273. 4
  3274. 4
  3275. 4
  3276. 4
  3277. 4
  3278. 4
  3279. 4
  3280. 4
  3281. 4
  3282. 4
  3283. 4
  3284. 4
  3285. 4
  3286. 4
  3287. 4
  3288. 4
  3289. 4
  3290. 4
  3291. 4
  3292. 4
  3293. 4
  3294. 4
  3295. 4
  3296. 4
  3297. 4
  3298. 4
  3299. 4
  3300. 4
  3301. 4
  3302. 4
  3303. 4
  3304. 4
  3305. 4
  3306. 4
  3307. 4
  3308. 4
  3309. 4
  3310. 4
  3311. 4
  3312. Quoting George Washington: "I have lately received information, which, in my opinion, merits attention. The brawlers against Government measures, in some of the most discontented parts of this state, have, all of a sudden become silent, and, it is added, are very desirous of obtaining Commissions in the army about to be raised. "This information did not fail to leave an impression upon my mind at the time I received it; but it has acquired strength from a publication I have lately seen in one of the Maryland Gazettes.... The motives ascribed to them are, that in such a situation they would endeavor to divide, & contaminate the army, by artful & seditious discourses, and perhaps at a critical moment, bring on confusion. What weight to give to these conjectures you can judge of, as well as I. But as there will be characters enough of an opposite description, who are ready to receive appointments, circumspection is necessary; for my opinion of the first are, that you could as soon scrub the blackamoor white, as to change the principles of a profest Democrat; and that he will leave nothing unattempted to overturn the Government of this Country. Finding the resentment of the People at the conduct of France too strong to be resisted, they have, in appearance, adopted their sentiments; and pretend that, not withstanding the misconduct of Government have brought it upon us, yet, if an Invasion should take place, it will be found that they will be among the first to defend it. This is their story at all Elections, and Election meetings, and told in many instances with effect."__George Washington to the Sec. of War during the XYZ Affair
    4
  3313. 4
  3314. 4
  3315. 4
  3316. 4
  3317. 4
  3318. 4
  3319. 4
  3320. 4
  3321. 4
  3322. 4
  3323. 4
  3324. 4
  3325. 4
  3326. 4
  3327. 4
  3328. 4
  3329. 4
  3330. 4
  3331. 4
  3332. 4
  3333. 4
  3334. 4
  3335. 4
  3336. 4
  3337. 4
  3338. 4
  3339. 4
  3340. 4
  3341. 4
  3342. 4
  3343. 4
  3344. How the people are duped into the Soviet or Nazi type of thinking is shown below, and it's sourced from MIT. "The quote cited [below] does not appear in transcripts of the Nuremberg trials because although Goering spoke these words during the course of the proceedings, he did not offer them at his trial. His comments were made privately to Gustave Gilbert, a German-speaking intelligence officer and psychologist who was granted free access by the Allies to all the prisoners held in the Nuremberg jail. Gilbert kept a journal of his observations of the proceedings and his conversations with the prisoners, which he later published in the book Nuremberg Diary . The quote offered [below] was part of a conversation Gilbert held with a dejected Hermann Goering in his cell on the evening of 18 April 1946, as the trials were halted for a three-day Easter recess: "Sweating in his cell in the evening, Goering was defensive and deflated and not very happy over the turn the trial was taking. He said that he had no control over the actions or the defense of the others, and that he had never been anti-Semitic himself, had not believed these atrocities, and that several Jews had offered to testify in his behalf. If [Hans] Frank [Governor-General of occupied Poland] had known about atrocities in 1943, he should have come to him and he would have tried to do something about it. He might not have had enough power to change things in 1943, but if somebody had come to him in 1941 or 1942 he could have forced a showdown. (I still did not have the desire at this point to tell him what [SS General Otto] Ohlendorf had said to this: that Goering had been written off as an effective "moderating" influence, because of his drug addiction and corruption.) I pointed out that with his "temperamental utterances," such as preferring the killing of 200 Jews to the destruction of property, he had hardly set himself up as champion of minority rights. Goering protested that too much weight was being put on these temperamental utterances. Furthermore, he made it clear that he was not defending or glorifying Hitler. "Later in the conversation, Gilbert recorded Goering's observations that the common people can always be manipulated into supporting and fighting wars by their political leaders: "We got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction. "'Why, of course, the people don't want war,' Goering shrugged. 'Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.' "'There is one difference,' I pointed out. 'In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.' "'Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.'"
    4
  3345. 4
  3346. 4
  3347. 4
  3348. 4
  3349. 4
  3350.  @cinystarr4657  Oh, they have spun so many myths and lies since the War of 1812, which led to the split in the Democratic-Republican Party, that it's unbelievable. It's insidious in what they've done with fake history. What happened goes back to Madison having to create another national bank to repay the war debt of the War of 1812. The northern Federalists, whose party had died, joined this faction, where they split off creating the Whigs, and then later, they became the GOP under Lincoln. "The Democratic-Republicans later splintered during the 1824 presidential election. The majority faction of the Democratic-Republicans eventually coalesced into the modern Democratic Party, while the minority faction ultimately formed the core of what became the Whig Party. "The Democratic-Republican Party originated as a faction in Congress that opposed the centralizing policies of Alexander Hamilton, who served as Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington. "Madison succeeded Jefferson as president in 1809 and led the country during the largely inconclusive War of 1812 with Britain. After the war, Madison and his congressional allies established the Second Bank of the United States and implemented protective tariffs, marking a move away from the party's earlier emphasis on states' rights and a strict construction of the United States Constitution. The Federalists collapsed after 1815, beginning a period known as the Era of Good Feelings. Lacking an effective opposition, the Democratic-Republicans split into groups after the 1824 presidential election; one faction supported President John Quincy Adams, while the other faction backed General Andrew Jackson. Jackson's faction eventually coalesced into the Democratic Party, while supporters of Adams became known as the National Republican Party, which itself later merged into the Whig Party." By 1900, both parties had become infected with progressive Federalism, and much of it was spread by Christian Socialism from the pulpits, where these myths were spread through the north. NYC was the center of it, where, during the Civil War, Marx was writing to Lincoln, and Greeley was publishing Marx's screeds in his New York paper. When you study this history, and Lincoln, you find that the Civil War was never about slavery, but about the fight between two political schools of thought, that of Jeffersonian Republicanism, and Hamiltonian Federalism. Federalism was the big brother centralized government idea, and want, which the Jeffersonians had kept under heel until the Civil War. That was why the south seceded - taxation, government overreach, and the centralization of Federal power. Literally, what we're in the midst of, right now, is Reconstruction 2.0, which started in the fifties and sixties with the World Federalist Movement inside the UN.
    4
  3351. 4
  3352. 4
  3353. 4
  3354. 4
  3355. 4
  3356. 4
  3357. 4
  3358. 4
  3359. 4
  3360. 4
  3361. 4
  3362. 4
  3363. 4
  3364. 4
  3365. 4
  3366. 4
  3367. 4
  3368. 4
  3369. 4
  3370. 4
  3371. 4
  3372. 4
  3373. 4
  3374. 4
  3375. 4
  3376. 4
  3377. 4
  3378. 4
  3379. 4
  3380. 4
  3381. 4
  3382. 4
  3383. 4
  3384. 4
  3385. 4
  3386. 4
  3387. 4
  3388. 4
  3389. 4
  3390. 4
  3391. 4
  3392. 4
  3393. 4
  3394. 4
  3395. 4
  3396. 4
  3397. 4
  3398. 4
  3399. 4
  3400. 4
  3401. 4
  3402. 4
  3403. 4
  3404. 4
  3405. 4
  3406. 4
  3407. 4
  3408. 4
  3409. 4
  3410. 4
  3411. 4
  3412. 4
  3413. 4
  3414. 4
  3415. 4
  3416. 4
  3417. 4
  3418. 4
  3419. 4
  3420. 4
  3421.  @shanewebb3341  Yes, I do, when you read what he stated. He was pro-British, loved national banking, was pro-tariff, and pro-big business. That was what created the clash between them and the Old Republicans. I have no idea if he ever perceived it as becoming this huge, but I think he would have enjoyed it. "Federalist policies called for a national bank, tariffs and good relations with Great Britain as expressed in the Jay Treaty negotiated in 1794. Hamilton developed the concept of implied powers [Note] and successfully argued the adoption of that interpretation of the Constitution. [This ended the strict reading of the law]. Their political opponents, the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson, denounced most of the Federalist policies, especially the bank and implied powers; and vehemently attacked the Jay Treaty as a sell-out of republican values to the British monarchy. The Jay Treaty passed and the Federalists won most of the major legislative battles in the 1790s. They held a strong base in the nation's cities and in New England. They factionalized when President Adams secured peace with France, to the anger of Hamilton's larger faction. After the Jeffersonians, whose base was in the rural South and West, won the hard-fought presidential election of 1800, the Federalists never returned to power. They recovered some strength through their intense opposition to the War of 1812, but they practically vanished during the Era of Good Feelings that followed the end of the war in 1815. "The Federalists left a lasting legacy in the form of a strong federal government. After losing executive power, they decisively shaped Supreme Court policy for another three decades through Chief Justice John Marshall." Marshall was the one that began reading the written law as something else. "After an American delegation was insulted in Paris in the XYZ affair (1797), public opinion ran strongly against the French. An undeclared "Quasi-War" with France from 1798 to 1800 saw each side attacking and capturing the other's shipping. It was called "quasi" because there was no declaration of war, but escalation was a serious threat. At the peak of their popularity, the Federalists took advantage by preparing for an invasion by the French Army. To silence Administration critics, the Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. The Alien Act empowered the President to deport such aliens as he declared to be dangerous. The Sedition Act made it a crime to print false, scandalous, and malicious criticisms of the federal government, but it conspicuously failed to criminalize criticism of Vice President Thomas Jefferson. "Several Republican newspaper editors were convicted under the Act and fined or jailed and three Democratic-Republican newspapers were shut down. In response, Jefferson and Madison secretly wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions passed by the two states' legislatures that declared the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional and insisted the states had the power to nullify federal laws. [Principles of 1798]. "Undaunted, the Federalists created a navy, with new frigates; and a large new army, with Washington in nominal command and Hamilton in actual command. To pay for it all, they raised taxes on land, houses, and slaves, leading to serious unrest."__Wiki
    4
  3422. 4
  3423. 4
  3424. 4
  3425. 4
  3426. 4
  3427. 4
  3428. 4
  3429. 4
  3430. Many forget that the US was founded by English Dissenters, which later become the left wing of politics. The Plymouth Colony in Plymouth, Massachusetts, was founded by Brownists, though they are called "Puritans." Many other dissenter groups came as well. "The Brownists were a group of English Dissenters or early Separatists from the Church of England. They were named after Robert Browne, who was born at Tolethorpe Hall in Rutland, England, in the 1550s. A majority of the Separatists aboard the Mayflower in 1620 were Brownists, and indeed the Pilgrims were known into the 20th century as the Brownist Emigration." That was why the New England states, and New York state, in particular, were always left-leaning to the point of radicalization. Those in Massachusetts ended up forming Christian Socialism by the late 1800s, with the Church of the Carpenter (Episcopalian or US Anglican), which moved to NYC as a base of operations. "The Church of the Carpenter was a mission of the Episcopal Church associated with the Society of Christian Socialists (SCS) in Boston. Its congregation was known as the Brotherhood of the Carpenter. Founded in 1890 by the Reverend W. D. P. Bliss." "On Sunday, April 13, 1890, the Reverend Bliss held the first service of the Church of the Carpenter in Brunswick Hall, 241 Tremont Street, Boston. Bliss explained his intent to the audience that crowded the hall: "We are not here to commence a revolution. We are here simply, quietly, humbly to consider the application to social problems of the old gospel of the carpenter who lived in Nazareth... "Change is everywhere. Christendom today is heaving with a divine unrest, as she has not moved since the days that preceded the Protestant reformation. Tolstoi in Russia, Stuart Headlam in London, Dr. McGlynn in New York City, voices in the Greek, the Anglican, the Roman Catholic communion, all speak of change, and they all move in one direction, the application of Christianity to social life... "The church of the carpenter is the church of the Son of Man. It is the church of humanity. It means sacrifice, the sacrifice of the individual, the sacrifice of self for the good of all. This is Christian socialism....we must work through the State and better the conditions of men as well as work through individuals." "The Church of the Carpenter was not a new denomination or sect, but a mission of the Episcopal Church under Bishop Brooks. It was incorporated as a parish of the Diocese of Boston, with Bliss as rector, on June 5, 1892." There was also a Karl Marx School in Boston before the move to NYC. The Episcopalians, who operate Columbia U, are why socialism invaded higher education, which spread from there. Before Columbia, they had started a social science school (Rand) where Trotsky lectured before leaving on a steamer to join Lenin in Saint Petersburg in 1917. "Throughout its history, the main activity of the SCS was centered in Boston. A New York branch was established in February 1890, and state societies were formed in Ohio, based in Cincinnati, and Illinois, based in Chicago, in May of that year. Kansas followed with a state Christian Socialist Society based in Independence, Kansas, by August." Also, there came the Mennonites and Amish, as well as other utopian communal groups from Europe. Is it any wonder that the CPUSA found NYC as its home once it was formed? This was why Dewey and the Episcopalian theology professors at Columbia U opened up their arms to the arrival of the Frankfurt School professors. This is what mixing cultures and their beliefs, or "diversity," results in.
    4
  3431. 4
  3432. 4
  3433. 4
  3434. 4
  3435. 4
  3436. 4
  3437. 4
  3438. 4
  3439. 4
  3440. 4
  3441. 4
  3442. 4
  3443.  @wigletron2846  There is a group of people, some now very wealthy, and who are in the computing industry, which have decided to overturn all societial norms, including the idea of right and wrong. Of course, this idea is much older, and can be found within the early psychiatrists from 1945, such as Dr. George Brock Chisholm, a Canadian psychiatrist, and the first director of the WHO. Think UN, NATO, Internationalists, and Atlantacists when reading the rest below. Think Woodrow Wilson. Quoting The Canadian Encyclopedia about Dr. Chisholm: "Chisholm’s public platform had grown since the mid-1930s, through his lectures and speeches. He had also earned a reputation for courting controversy, which peaked in 1945 with his remarks in several speeches on parenting, education and morality. That October, in New York, his lecture on peace to the William Alanson White Foundation drew calls for his resignation from Cabinet ministers and more than 20 non-governmental organizations. Chisholm had attacked traditional morality and religious teachings for instilling guilt, fear and prejudice in children. In his view, these teachings produced immature adults incapable of free, rational thought and ultimately bound for war. Not all objected to his opinions: some journalists, prominent psychiatrists and the faculty of Queen’s University came to his defence [sic] over the White Foundation lecture. "The solutions Chisholm proposed for world peace could be authoritarian. In his 1945 acceptance speech for the Albert A. and Mary Woodward Lasker Award from the US National Committee for Mental Hygiene, Chisholm proposed that, as a short-term solution, a world police force could help keep peace by destroying any nation that started war. [Here, think NATO] "In November 1945, Chisholm delivered some of his most famous remarks in a speech to parents at the Rockliffe Home and School Association in Ottawa. The theme was similar to that of his speech the previous month: traditional approaches to child-rearing made world peace impossible. To make his point, he attacked the tradition of teaching children to believe in Santa Claus: “'Any man who tells his son that the sun goes to bed at night is contributing directly to the next war… Any child who believes in Santa Claus has had his ability to think permanently destroyed… Can you imagine a child of four being led to believe that a man of grown stature is able to climb down a chimney… that Santa Claus can cover the entire world in one night distributing presents to everyone! He will be a man who has ulcers at 40, develops a sore back when there is a tough job to do, and refuses to think realistically when war threatens.'” ====== Quoting Chisholm: "Conscience is what your mother told you before you were six years old.”__Brock Chisholm "What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of which we know anything? The only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality - the concept of right and wrong. The re-interpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all of psychotherapy.”__Brock Chisholm "...the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.”__Brock Chisholm
    4
  3444. 4
  3445. 4
  3446. 4
  3447. 4
  3448. 4
  3449. 3
  3450. David Stewart Keep in mind, that those aren't my words, but those of Alinski, Cloward, and Piven, which are parroted and taught by those such as Ayers. By the way, you can download Alinsky's book, Rules for Radicals, or read it online at archive.org, if you want to read all his hogwash. https://archive.org/details/RulesForRadicals The reason why that they want all that, is because they want everyone dependent on the government, in one form or another, and the more dependent the better. It lets them control the people, assuring their party the vote, and it sets up a totalitarian system. Those programs make it so that people will vote for a certain party, because they are afraid to lose what they have been given on a silver platter, (though conservatives are not against things such as social security, just the method that brought it about). Thus, your liberty and free thinking are taken away from you. That is what they did in Russia, and we all watched as it failed. The Marxists have watched their own failings happen several times, thus, they have resorted to other methods, by changing their philosophy slightly, to come back at it from a different angle. They had already changed their dogma several times, within the Frankfurt School, before its professors fled here. It has always failed. Conservatism is not against the poor, nor especially the infirm or elderly. What they are for is a limited federal government, as per the US Constitution, and states rights. Lastly, conservatism is against wasting money. One of the largest concerns, right now, is the national debt. All money (bills of credit) is borrowed into existence, from the Federal Reserve, (a private banking cartel, which is not a federal agency, and was installed by Woodrow Wilson), by the Federal Government, and the Fed is given bonds (IOUs), by our government, stating that they will be paid back with interest. The Fed sets the interest rates. So, what would happen, right now, if the Fed decided to sharply raise the interest rate? Where would the money to pay that extra interest come from? You see where this is going? They want the poor dependent on the government, and higher taxes mean more poor. Did you know that the Fed has told congress that they have "lost" several trillion dollars? Whose going to pay for that? From the Fiscal Times: "The U.S. military is good at fighting wars, but it sucks at managing money. Partly because of its convoluted bookkeeping systems, $8.5 trillion—yes, trillion—taxpayer dollars doled out by Congress since 1996 has never been accounted for." http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/03/19/85-Trillion-Unaccounted-Should-Congress-Increase-Defense-Budget From Signs of the Times: "$16,000,000,000,000.00 had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland. From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the world's banks, corporations, and governments." "When you have conservative Republican stalwarts like Jim DeMint(R-SC) and Ron Paul(R-TX) as well as self identified Democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders all fighting against the Federal Reserve, you know that it is no longer an issue of Right versus Left. When you have every single member of the Republican Party in Congress and progressive Congressmen like Dennis Kucinich sponsoring a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, you realize that the Federal Reserve is an entity onto itself, which has no oversight and no accountability." https://www.sott.net/article/250592-Audit-of-the-Federal-Reserve-Reveals-16-Trillion-in-Secret-Bailouts Marxism, or Marxist Socialism, does not care about the poor, infirm, nor elderly, though they will lie to you, claiming that they do. They hate western society, and they have vowed to topple it, using any means necessary. They hate liberty and free thinking societies. They especially hate the middle class. They want a two class system, the rich lording over the poor.
    3
  3451. 3
  3452. 3
  3453. Hillary is a warhawk, and even the Communist Party USA, who support her, state that she is. From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." "We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization." [nominee meaning Sanders or Clinton] "Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large “speaking” fees from Wall Street. But we know this already." They know how she is, but they happily support her. That is who the Hillary supporters are voting for, a Communist radical. http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/ From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/
    3
  3454. 3
  3455. 3
  3456. 3
  3457. 3
  3458. 3
  3459. 3
  3460. 3
  3461. 3
  3462. 3
  3463. 3
  3464. 3
  3465. 3
  3466. 3
  3467. 3
  3468. 3
  3469. 3
  3470. 3
  3471. 3
  3472. 3
  3473. 3
  3474. 3
  3475. 3
  3476. 3
  3477. 3
  3478. Will Px; Oh cry me a handful leftie, I'll call you a Communist if I want. I watched the DC Protesters, from DisruptJ20, who stated outright that they were Marxists, proud Communists, and one was waving a red flag with the hammer and sickle. Need I expose your lot more? How about Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward? Below is your party in a nut shell, and it has been since the 1960s. Communist Party USA (CPUSA) Democratic Socialists of America SDS Students for a Democratic Society (Founded by Aryeh Neier) ACLU Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism Socialist International (SI) Woods Fund of Chicago Chicago's school reform movement. (Ayers stated it was to teach revolutionary communism). University of Chicago Columbia University ACORN Planned Parenthood Open Society Institute (Ran by Aryeh Neier. Founded by George Soros) Human Rights Watch, aka Helsinki Watch (Founded by Aryeh Neier) Weather Underground (Weathermen) William Charles "Bill" Ayers (Weathermen) Bernardine Dohrn (Weathermen) Kathy Boudin (Weathermen) Now released and teaching at Columbia U. David Gilbert (Weathermen) Larry Grathwohl (Weathermen) Michael Klonsky (Weathermen) Susan Rosenberg (Weathermen) Linda Sue Evans (Weathermen) Saul Alinsky Frances Fox Piven Richard Cloward Aryeh Neier (Born in Berlin, Nazi Germany. Was hired by the ACLU 1963, became the executive director 1970) Carl Davidson Frank Marshall Davis George Soros aka György Schwartz (Born in Nazi Budapest, Hungary. The President of his Open Society Institute is Aryeh Neier, one of the founders of the radical Students for a Democratic Society.).
    3
  3479. 3
  3480. Well, one thing is for certain, the leftists just lost the Cuban-American's vote. Their bragging up a Marxist dictator to the Cuban-Americans is like a slap to their face, and claiming that their horror stories are all a lie. Castro was so radical, that Khrushchev not only disliked him, but didn't trust him as far as he could throw him. What happened in Cuba was a switch from one despot tyrant to another. A story was told about one elderly Cuban who made it to the US, and saw his first supermarket, where he broke down and cried at all the food. When they led him outside, he stated that we Americans did know how lucky we had it, and when it was pointed out that the supermarket was not the only one in the area, the man broke down again. Stories about money being sent to relatives were many, and that money went to Castro, never to reach their relatives. In Cuba, if you hoarded food, they would imprison you, or worse. Yet, the leftist MSM try to brag up a tyrant? Of course they would, as Castro had their same Marxist ideology. You notice how the left are finally showing that they are Marxists, openly? The Marxists and the Communists started infiltrating the Democrats in the late 1940s and 1950s. They succeeded, and seated their first one into power, with Johnson in the White House. This is why the Communist Party USA has not ran their own candidate in some time, as they have been backing the DNC openly, since Obama. They have written about that on their own website. They openly backed Obama, Sanders, and Hillary.
    3
  3481. 3
  3482. 3
  3483. 3
  3484. 3
  3485. 3
  3486. 3
  3487. 3
  3488. 3
  3489. 3
  3490. 3
  3491. 3
  3492. 3
  3493. 3
  3494. 3
  3495. 3
  3496. 3
  3497. 3
  3498. 3
  3499. 3
  3500. 3
  3501. 3
  3502. 3
  3503. 3
  3504. 3
  3505. 3
  3506. 3
  3507. 3
  3508. 3
  3509. 3
  3510. 3
  3511. 3
  3512. 3
  3513. 3
  3514. 3
  3515. 3
  3516. LMAO! I saw this coming a long time ago. I knew that the DNC wanted Obamacare to fail, so they could pull this. It is all a part of the Marxist Cloward-Piven strategy, which is ongoing. Both Cloward and Piven, (Marxist-Communist activists), wrote another article, in the Marxist magazine, The Nation, last year, bragging about how their plan was succeeding, and how they were going to tax the rich. Hillary and Obama are Marxists to the bone. If you think not, read Cloward and Piven's spiel at the link below. https://www.thenation.com/article/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty/ What is the 1966 Marxist/Communist Cloward-Piven strategy, you may ask? The Marxist Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: "Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state." (From Alinsky's activist group, and The Nation's, printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and [Marxist] political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"."
    3
  3517. 3
  3518. 3
  3519. 3
  3520. 3
  3521. 3
  3522. 3
  3523. 3
  3524. 3
  3525. 3
  3526. 3
  3527. 3
  3528. 3
  3529. 3
  3530. 3
  3531. 3
  3532. 3
  3533. 3
  3534. 3
  3535. 3
  3536. 3
  3537. 3
  3538. 3
  3539. 3
  3540. 3
  3541. 3
  3542. 3
  3543. 3
  3544. 3
  3545. 3
  3546. 3
  3547. 3
  3548. The only state who mentioned that someone tried to hack into their voter data was Georgia, and it was the DHS who tried to do it! I do not care who you are, every hacker has to have an IP address, even if it is from a proxy server. If someone tries to hack an account, there will be an IP address associated with it. That does not mean that you can trace it back to its origin, because a real hacker will use a proxy server, which will block the hops back to the original source. Because of this, you can not prove who did it. If it was a kid in their parents basement, who didn't use a proxy, then yes, you could trace the hack to the source. It seems to me, that the CIA are lying through their teeth, and they hope the public are dumb enough to not know how the Internet works. Next, we get to the e-mails. Wikileaks has stated, several times, that it was a leak. A leak are files stolen by someone within, and sent to Wikileaks. Thus, someone didn't hack into anything, they had full access to the files, copied them, and sent them to Wikileaks, after they slipped them out of the building. It was an inside job, and a Russian hacker was not involved. From The Guardian: "Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.” "“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things." also, "The California Republican congressman Devin Nunes, chair of the House intelligence committee and a member of the Trump transition team, said: “I’ll be the first one to come out and point at Russia if there’s clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence – even now. There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it.”" https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/10/cia-concludes-russia-interfered-to-help-trump-win-election-report?CMP=share_btn_tw Craig Murray's blog article about it: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/ Then, we have the FBI, the NSA, and the Clapper stating that the CIA has nothing. Look into the history of the CIA's director.
    3
  3549. 3
  3550. 3
  3551. 3
  3552. 3
  3553. 3
  3554. 3
  3555. 3
  3556. 3
  3557. 3
  3558. 3
  3559. 3
  3560. 3
  3561. 3
  3562. 3
  3563. 3
  3564. 3
  3565. 3
  3566. 3
  3567. 3
  3568. 3
  3569. 3
  3570. 3
  3571. jerry henrie I am in high level Freemasonry, a 32nd as a matter of fact, and not one thing you have said, happens. As a matter of fact, The Scottish and York Rites are a rite you go through, once, unless you go back by sponsoring another to watch it again. It is a set of a few plays, over a weekend in the US, and that is all there is to it. You don't even take all the degrees, only a handful. Still, the 3rd degree is as high as you can go, and the other degrees really don't mean much at all. All the work and meetings take place in the blue lodge, the first three degrees. The people who say that things happen in the higher degrees, like the conspiracy theorists, have no idea what they speak of, as its not as those take place every week, where a bunch of 32nd's get together, or that they are regular meetings. They are nothing but an extra rite, pretty much to brag about, and a set of one-time moral lessons. As a matter of fact, there are only 1-2 places, per state, to take the Scottish or York rites, where that pretty much knocks out everyone gathering for some sort of regular secret meeting, for the higher ups, so its out of the question. The conspiracy nuts don't tell you that. The only regular meetings, for everyone, is the Blue Lodge, or the first three degrees. Heck, the Shrine has more meetings that the Two rites do, by a whole lot. Most sates put the rites on about once or twice a year. People like Bill Schnoeblen, Jack Chick, David Icke, and many others are downright liars, and are making money off those lies, as they know anyone who believes conspiracy tales will be suckered into their tales. They still quote the books written by Leo Taxil, in the late 1800's. which was a hoax against Freemasonry and the Roman Catholic Church. Taxil admitted to it, in front of the Catholic clergy, at a news conference in France, then made a speedy departure. Look up the Taxil Hoax. Schnoebelen claims to be a member of the Palladium, which Taxil made up, and there is no such a thing. It's funny that several preachers bring this up, too, and they know its a lie. If they don't, they shouldn't be preaching. Funny that some of those, are those Rolex wearing, Mercedes driving, TV evangelists too.
    3
  3572. 3
  3573. 3
  3574. 3
  3575. 3
  3576. 3
  3577. 3
  3578. 3
  3579. 3
  3580. 3
  3581. 3
  3582. 3
  3583. 3
  3584. 3
  3585. 3
  3586. 3
  3587. 3
  3588. 3
  3589. 3
  3590. 3
  3591. 3
  3592. 3
  3593. 3
  3594. 3
  3595. 3
  3596. 3
  3597. 3
  3598. 3
  3599. Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3). Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation. Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law. Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses. https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-1907-title-8-usc-1324a-offenses
    3
  3600. 3
  3601. 3
  3602. 3
  3603. 3
  3604. 3
  3605. 3
  3606. 3
  3607. 3
  3608. 3
  3609. 3
  3610. 3
  3611. 3
  3612. 3
  3613. 3
  3614. 3
  3615. 3
  3616. 3
  3617. 3
  3618. 3
  3619. 3
  3620. 3
  3621. 3
  3622.  @jitblues  He's another puppet in a long line of others that are directed by a cabal of international corporations and bankers that also work with the mob. Biden at Chatham House during Obama: "He outlines how a rule-based world order is struggling to keep pace with global change, and why he thinks globalization is fueling a sense among some that open economies and multilateral agreements are actually a raw deal. "He says even the most vocal defenders of the liberal international order - of which he is one - have to recognize the shortcomings of a system built more than 70 years ago, and that open societies are not self-sustaining but require attention and maintenance."__Chatham House In other words, that would be that he knew the public was dissatisfied with the Trilateral Commission and CFR's push for globalization via their "multilateral agreements," and that the UN's globalist sustainability plot would need modified. It was, behind the scenes during Trump by Biden's handlers. Also note the "Open Society" mentioned. George Soros et al. However, he and his puppeteers are doing exactly the opposite of what the public demands, especially with China and other nations. He's completely reversed course on what Trump had done with China, and allowed Russia to continue the Nord Stream 2, which will be used to control Europe. Worse, the US's energy independence is now kaput, he rejoined the Paris Agreement that is at the heart of the scheme, and the southern border is wide open. He's an empty suit, and his puppet strings lead back to the CFR.
    3
  3623. 3
  3624. 3
  3625. 3
  3626. 3
  3627. 3
  3628. 3
  3629. 3
  3630. 3
  3631. 3
  3632. 3
  3633. Quoting George Washington: "I have lately received information, which, in my opinion, merits attention. The brawlers against Government measures, in some of the most discontented parts of this state, have, all of a sudden become silent, and, it is added, are very desirous of obtaining Commissions in the army about to be raised. "This information did not fail to leave an impression upon my mind at the time I received it; but it has acquired strength from a publication I have lately seen in one of the Maryland Gazettes.... The motives ascribed to them are, that in such a situation they would endeavor to divide, & contaminate the army, by artful & seditious discourses, and perhaps at a critical moment, bring on confusion. What weight to give to these conjectures you can judge of, as well as I. But as there will be characters enough of an opposite description, who are ready to receive appointments, circumspection is necessary; for my opinion of the first are, that you could as soon scrub the blackamoor white, as to change the principles of a profest Democrat; and that he will leave nothing unattempted to overturn the Government of this Country. Finding the resentment of the People at the conduct of France too strong to be resisted, they have, in appearance, adopted their sentiments; and pretend that, not withstanding the misconduct of Government have brought it upon us, yet, if an Invasion should take place, it will be found that they will be among the first to defend it. This is their story at all Elections, and Election meetings, and told in many instances with effect."__George Washington to the Sec. of War during the XYZ Affair
    3
  3634. 3
  3635. 3
  3636. 3
  3637. 3
  3638. 3
  3639. 3
  3640. 3
  3641. 3
  3642. 3
  3643. 3
  3644. 3
  3645. 3
  3646.  @boygeorge3544  "Systemic racism," "it was only white men," much of Afrocentrism's history, and I could go on, were the myths created by the "intellectuals." Same with what Simon mentioned about lyn ch mobs back then. When the civil rights movement started under Ike, it was only the states farthest south that were not integrated. The farther north you went, the more integration there was. By the mid-sixties, the only time you noticed certain water fountain or bathroom signs in the northernmost southern states, were on old derelict buildings that were falling in, and they were few and far between. These states were already integrated, and everyone worked together. The government, during that same time, had Hollywood to produce several TV shows, which cast the south as being full of white rubes, and they were the Beverly Hillbillies and Petticoat Junction. Another was Green Acres. None of that represented reality. They did it to push FDR's New Deal and social welfare. The "intellectuals" used that community to push Communism, and Trotskyism, by the use of organizers. They brought violence into what started as a peaceful protest, which they were already winning, and that was a good thing, but the violence was not. One of the leaders of that violence, Williams, ended up fleeing to Cuba after being booted from the NAACP, where he ran a propaganda radio station for Castro. That violence spawned the other violence. The "great migration" caused many in their community to change political affiliation from the right to the left, which was exactly what the intellectuals were after. That was after the migrants joined several large labor unions, especially automotive.
    3
  3647. 3
  3648. 3
  3649. 3
  3650. 3
  3651. 3
  3652. 3
  3653. 3
  3654. 3
  3655. 3
  3656. 3
  3657. 3
  3658. 3
  3659. 3
  3660. 3
  3661. 3
  3662. 3
  3663. 3
  3664. 3
  3665. 3
  3666. 3
  3667. 3
  3668. 3
  3669. 3
  3670. 3
  3671. 3
  3672. 3
  3673. 3
  3674. 3
  3675. The problem with today's younger adult population is that they have been brainwashed by the government since the nineties, have been kept on the teat of the welfare state, and have been sold a lie about US history starting from about 1824 until now. Well, most of us have, as US history scholars have lied by omission since about 1900, and placed our corrupt leaders upon pedestals. Some of the public even deifies our presidents while standing in awe before their large marble statues inside copies of Greek temples. They do this while not knowing that the truth about these men (Lincoln, Hamilton, et al) is almost the opposite of what they've been told, and this has occurred in our allied nations as well. In the US, it's been coined Hamilton's curse in a book with that title, and below is a snippet about it: "The Hamiltonian legacy wrested control into the hands of the federal government by inventing the myth of the Constitution’s 'implied powers,' transforming state governments from Jeffersonian bulwarks of liberty to beggars for federal crumbs. It also devised a national banking system that imposes boom-and-bust cycles on the American economy; saddled Americans with a massive national debt and oppressive taxation, and pushed economic policies that lined the pockets of the wealthy and created a government system built on graft, spoils, and patronage." Those that are too lazy to pick up a historical book by differing scholars, and believe everything they're told by Uncle Sam, have damned us all in the voting booths.
    3
  3676. 3
  3677. 3
  3678. 3
  3679. 3
  3680. 3
  3681. 3
  3682. 3
  3683. 3
  3684. 3
  3685. 3
  3686. 3
  3687. 3
  3688. 3
  3689. 3
  3690. 3
  3691. 3
  3692. 3
  3693. 3
  3694. @Rachel Shelly, A lot of this hinges on the Glorius Revolution in Britain when the aristocracy lost its stranglehold, and they immediately started scheming to take it back. The next Revolution occurred in the US, and then France. However, France was over a whole lot more, as France and Britain had been in war. From 1778 to 1783, and "concomitant with the American Revolutionary War. ... Great Britain was then at war with France, and in 1779 it was also at war with Spain." Certain radical deist pastors, like David Williams, from Britain, went to France, along with Thomas Paine from the US, and they helped stir up the war. Food shipments were purposely held back from France. There were several radical groups, including occult groups, behind the Jacobins, especially the Cordeliers. The Dominicans (Black Monks), as well as Jesuit university professors, were tied to these cults also, though the RCC tries to deny it. What they preached was very close to Communism, along with the deists and the spiel of the atheists. Out of this came the Conspiracy of Equals, the Cult of Reason, and the Cult of the Supreme Being. The first cult was atheism, and the second the ancient state religion spoken of by Celsus during the 2nd Century, which was in the Imperial Cult of Rome, the Pythagorean Cult, and the Cult of Isis that worshiped the goddess of wisdom, known as the "Queen of the Night" that the owl followed. This cult is the basis of the European monarchy and the Holy See. You will notice the eye and mountain/pyramid symbology during this time in France. Study the story of Polyphemus. This was Celsus' cult. Early Christianity, before Constantine, was a different religion. It became the state religion under him and brought the three estates back. Mary became the equivalent to the goddess of wisdom, and Jesus the Sun God. Roman Empire -> Holy Roman Empire -> European aristocracy. Protestantism tried to srtip out this pagan belief.
    3
  3695. 3
  3696. 3
  3697. 3
  3698. 3
  3699. 3
  3700. 3
  3701. 3
  3702. 3
  3703. 3
  3704. 3
  3705. 3
  3706. 3
  3707. 3
  3708. 3
  3709. 3
  3710. 3
  3711. 3
  3712. 3
  3713. 3
  3714. 3
  3715. 3
  3716. 3
  3717. 3
  3718. 3
  3719. 3
  3720. 3
  3721. 3
  3722. I often wonder if many know the real roots of communism. The "commune," used in this way, was the brainchild of François-Noël "Gracchus" Babeuf, a Frenchman and Jacobin, who rebelled alongside other anarchists such as Robespierre, Saint-Simon, and many others. However, Babeuf's ideas came from the Diggers in Britain, the writing of Rousseau, and the politics of the Jacobins. One could say that the French Revolution was the first communist revolution. Much of the thought came from the radical Unitarians, which leads all the way back to Bohemia and the radical Hussites. Babeuf's "communiste" was changed to the English word, communism, by Goodwyn Barmby, over those he described as the "disciples of Babeuf." He even started a Church of Communism. Many call communists Babeufians, which eventually leads to the Jacobin ideas within the university, and Karl Marx. Marx, after all, wished that the Paris Commune had succeeded. The funny thing, and many people grasp at straws to deny this, is, the same revolutionary ideas lead to the Italian Revolution (Risorgimento) under Giuseppe Mazzini, Giuseppe Garibaldi, and the early mafioso. It also leads to the proto-fascists, the Decadent Movement, and people such as Guido Keller , Gabriele D'Annunzio , and the Free State of Fiume in 1919. Worse, it leads to the creation of both Nazism and Fascism, as well as their occult beliefs. I also notice the comments about Freemasonry. Many of the Jacobins were French Freemasons. However, they changed it, and took God out of it, creating the Grand Orient of France, and an occult religion known as Martinism. The Mother Lodge, in London, (The United Grand Lodge of England), finally had their fill of the French radicals, and revoked their charter, making it clandestine and "irregular," meaning that it was rogue, and off-limits. In reality, there were more protestants and atheists in the movement than J##s. The J##s involved, were mainly within the universities across Europe.
    3
  3723. 3
  3724. This is only more proof about who the left actually are. You think that National Socialists (Nazis) and the Russian & Chinese Socialists (Communists) have disappeared? No, as you can find them running the Democratic Party, the EU, and the UN. You see, the Democrats admit to being socialists, but they don't like anyone knowing the origins of their socialism. The Democratic Party hasn't been the party of Jefferson since 1948, when they were infiltrated, and slowly taken over by both branches of socialism (Nazism and Communism). Next, we have the Muslim connection. You see, the left does not like talking about their ties to radical Jihadist Muslims. The very person who started Jihadism, was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammed Amin Al-Husseini, who fled to Germany during WWII. He asked Hitler to exterminate the Jews, and if he would, then the Muslims would fight for the Nazis, and they did. The Nazis trained and armed the Jihadists, and after WWII, the Communists took their place. Look at how many of the European countries are being ran by leftist-socialists, and how many are running the EU. Look what has taken place in the US under Obama, a socialist and a Muslim. Look at Canada, who is being ran by a socialist. They are after one thing, and will go to great lengths to obtain it, and that is to destroy the sovereignty of the nations, and to destroy natural rights, such as freedom of speech, etc. Their end goal is a one world socialist (Nazi and Communist) government, consisting of North America, the EU, and Japan. It will consist of the poor on a government dole, and the rich elite running the government. Yes, it is feudalism all over again; serfdom of the masses. Who's behind the one world government? The Trilateral Commission was stated by David Rockefeller during the Nixon Administration, and the idea of a one world government was formed by that commission. It was started to fight against Nixon's trade policies and his economic plan. The high price of oil was a fabrication of this group, and they based the dollar on it. After that, the price of gasoline has never went back down. Yes, now you see the Muslims, their oil, and the connection to this group of socialist fanatics.
    3
  3725. 3
  3726. 3
  3727. 3
  3728. 3
  3729. 3
  3730. 3
  3731. 3
  3732. 3
  3733. 3
  3734. 3
  3735. 3
  3736. 3
  3737. 3
  3738. 3
  3739. 3
  3740. 3
  3741. 3
  3742. 3
  3743. 3
  3744. 3
  3745. 3
  3746. 3
  3747. 3
  3748. 3
  3749. 3
  3750. 3
  3751. 3
  3752. 3
  3753. 3
  3754. 3
  3755. 3
  3756. 3
  3757. 3
  3758. 3
  3759. 3
  3760. 3
  3761. 3
  3762. 3
  3763. 3
  3764. 3
  3765. 3
  3766. 3
  3767. 3
  3768. 3
  3769. 3
  3770. 3
  3771. 3
  3772. 3
  3773. 3
  3774. 3
  3775. 3
  3776. 3
  3777. 3
  3778. 3
  3779. 3
  3780. 3
  3781. 3
  3782. 3
  3783. 3
  3784. 3
  3785. 3
  3786. 3
  3787. 3
  3788. 3
  3789. 3
  3790. 3
  3791. 3
  3792. 3
  3793. 3
  3794. 3
  3795. 3
  3796. 3
  3797. 3
  3798. 3
  3799. 3
  3800. 3
  3801. 3
  3802. 3
  3803. 3
  3804. 3
  3805. 3
  3806. 3
  3807. 3
  3808. 3
  3809. 3
  3810. 3
  3811. 3
  3812. 3
  3813. 3
  3814. 3
  3815. 3
  3816. 3
  3817. 3
  3818. 3
  3819. 3
  3820. 3
  3821. 3
  3822. 3
  3823. 3
  3824. 3
  3825. 3
  3826. 3
  3827. 3
  3828. 3
  3829. 3
  3830. 3
  3831. 3
  3832. 3
  3833. 3
  3834. 3
  3835. 3
  3836. 3
  3837. 3
  3838. 3
  3839. 3
  3840. 3
  3841. 3
  3842. 3
  3843. 3
  3844. 3
  3845. 3
  3846. 3
  3847. 3
  3848. 3
  3849. spf_fishing: I have never taken a celebrity or the media seriously. Some people, unfortunately, do. Luckily a good majority have seemed to notice the truth and turned their backs on the media. As an example, CNN was busted not long after the Iraq war began, using staged scenes, yet some still followed them. However, those of us who are learned in world government history know the truth about the media establishment and who controls it. Here is some British history about the BBC and a British film studio. Reference the books titled "Colonel Z, The Secret Life Of A Master Of Spies," by Read and Fisher, and "House of Spies: St Ermin's Hotel, the London Base of British Espionage," by Matthews. The Z Organization (ran by Col. Claude Dansey), which was an arm of MI6, the BBC, and a new movie studio appeared at the same time, being run from Bush House in London in 1937. The Kemsley Newspaper Group was also used. Jews fleeing Nazi Europe went to work there, and at Hollywood. Many were from the same families that we know of today in the media, especially those who cry the loudest (Reiner et al). Also, notice the Cohen family link below. In the US, Hearst publishing was used by the government to push their propaganda and that spread to the others and Hollywood. Some of my own family owned the Louisville Courier Journal and did the same. It was no different than Horace Greeley spreading Marx's propaganda in his New York newspaper during the Civil War. Hearst's actions are where the term "yellow-pen journalism" originates. It was Col. Dansey that helped the US in founding the Bureau of Investigation (later becoming the FBI), the OSS, and the C_A. Z Orginizaton an "The Secret History of MI6": "Dansey set up his headquarters in Bush House, on the Aldwych, with business cover as the Export Department of Geoffrey Duveen & Co. One of his first officers, Lieutenant Commander Kenneth Cohen, a retired naval officer who had specialised in torpedo duties (when he may have come to Sinclair’s notice), was a Staff College graduate and spoke good Russian, French and German. In 1937 he was ‘interviewed anonymously by arrangement in my car on The Mall’, by a ‘Mr Mansfield’, who turned out to be Dansey. Cohen afterwards described Dansey as ‘a “copybook” secret service man. Dapper, establishment, Boodles [Club], poker-playing expression, bitterly cynical, but with unlimited and illogical charm available, particularly for women’.31 The organisation operated entirely under business cover and Dansey exploited his and Sinclair’s contacts in the business and commercial world to infiltrate and/or enlist people to work for them. Although the idea of a new, and more secure, wing of the Service was, perhaps, sound, the execution of the scheme left something to be desired. Recruitment appears to have been done just as haphazardly as for SIS in general, and training was rudimentary. One officer was engaged straight from Cambridge University, given a short briefing on military requirements and sent to Vienna, ostensibly working for a film company but actually to report on German order of battle and other armed service targets. With no instructions on how to carry out this work and no background to help him with his cover, he simply toured Germany ‘sending back what he noticed, on his travels, of German Army identifications, aircraft, radar and other equipment.'" [sic] https://erenow.net/modern/the-secret-history-of-mi6/10.php House of Spies: St Ermin's Hotel, the London Base of British Espionage: https://books.google.com/books?id=O2NODQAAQBAJ&pg=PT68&lpg=PT68&dq=dansey,+film+studio+at+bush+house&source=bl&ots=vBIP1kpYNA&sig=ACfU3U3_vlyNmBxkQ8SXi3l6v4HAhl24rQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwizr66kjPTmAhXBm-AKHcm4AxUQ6AEwAHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=dansey%2C%20film%20studio%20at%20bush%20house&f=false
    3
  3850.  @99tubalcain  Nowhere, did I state that those Frankfurt professors were from a protestant sect. However, the one major university that accepted them with open arms, Columbia, was tied to the Trinity Church, and the Episcopal Diocese of New York, in Manhattan, as well as what is known as the Anglo-American Establishment. They are affiliated with the Union Theological Seminary. It was Dewey, an "American philosopher, psychologist, and educational reformer whose ideas have been influential in education and social reform," who brought the professors in. Though Dewey was an atheist, Columbia, with its ties to protestant religion, brought this ideology within its doors. Dewey was a "well-known public intellectual, he was a major voice of progressive education and liberalism." He also traveled to meet Leon Trotsky. However, the protestant roots go back to Boston, and with what later became known as the Rand School of Social Science, which is where Trotsky was lecturing before he left to meet up with Lenin. "The idea of establishing new schools for the promotion of socialist ideas in the United States emerged at the end of the 19th century, when a group of Christian socialists organized as the Social Reform Union established the College of Social Science — a correspondence school — in the city of Boston in 1899. Another similarly short-lived institution called the "Karl Marx School" was established in that same city at around that same time." During this same time, a similar movement was occurring at Oxford, with Ruskin College. "Shortly after the establishment of the Socialist Party of America in August 1901 an effort was made to establish an institution called the Workmen's Educational League in New York City. This was soon renamed the Socialist Educational League, but the change of moniker did nothing to aid the school's survival and it, too, soon passed." "A more serious and official effort at establishing a New York socialist training school came late in 1904, when the City Central Committee of Local Greater New York announced that between the first of the year and May 30, 1905 a socialist school would be established 'especially for the instruction of speakers.'" "The idea of a permanent socialist school in New York City, which took form as the Rand School of Social Science, began with the Christian socialist minister, Herron, and his mother-in-law and financial patron, the widowed lumber heiress Rand. After marrying Mrs. Rand's daughter in 1901 — regarded as scandalous owing to his divorce and abandonment of his first wife and family — the Herrons moved to New York City, where George became a prominent figure in the fledgling Socialist Party." In Detroit, a similar thing occurred, with Niebuhr, who "was an American Reformed theologian, ethicist, commentator on politics and public affairs, and professor at Union Theological Seminary for more than 30 years." Niebuhr ended up in New York, where, in "the 1930s, [and during the same time of the Frankfurt School professors], Niebuhr was often seen as an intellectual opponent of John Dewey. Both men were professional polemicists and their ideas often clashed, although they contributed to the same realms of liberal intellectual schools of thought." First names were removed, so the post will not be deleted.
    3
  3851. 3
  3852. 3
  3853. Kacie Anderson: There is also the fact, that a separation of church and state can be found nowhere in our Constitution, nor within the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court cited a letter, by Jefferson, to the Danbury Baptists, but Jefferson had no part in writing the 1st Amendment. Madison's original words, were a ban on state religion, but not the removal of religion from the people making up our government, nor removing religion from within the government itself. We know this, because oaths are sworn upon the bible, and there has always been a prayer, led by a chaplain, in congress, since that time. I say, let him have it, as this gives the right a weapon to use against the left, supporting the Ten Commandments being placed in the courts. That is the ancient moral laws, written by kings, which is older than the Jews, no matter the claims of their origin within the Bible. Madison's original words: "The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed. The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable. The people shall not be restrained from peaceably assembling and consulting for their common good; nor from applying to the Legislature by petitions, or remonstrances, for redress of their grievances."
    3
  3854. 3
  3855. 3
  3856. 3
  3857. 3
  3858. 3
  3859. 3
  3860. 3
  3861. 3
  3862. 3
  3863. 3
  3864. 3
  3865. 3
  3866. The key is who JP Morgan's father crawled into bed with, in the City of London, which was George Peabody and friends, and the Reform Club that Peabody belonged to. "Peabody continued to deal in dry goods and other commodities – he increasingly focused his attentions on merchant banking, specializing in financing governments and large companies. The bank [George Peabody and Company] rose to become the premier American house in London." Essentially, The City had its hooks into America's heavy industry, and thus Wall Street and the banks. What family was the powerhouse behind the Bank of England? Why was JP Morgan called the Rothschild's frontman in New York? What about Barings' frontman? "Peabody joined forces with Barings Bank to lobby American states for debt repayment, particularly his home state of Maryland. The campaign included printing propaganda and bribing clergy and politicians, most notably Senator Daniel Webster. Peabody made a significant profit when Maryland, Pennsylvania, and other states resumed payments, having previously bought up state bonds at a low cost." "Peabody took Junius Spencer Morgan (father of J. P. Morgan) into partnership in 1854 to form Peabody, Morgan & Co., and the two financiers worked together until Peabody's retirement in 1864; Morgan had effective control of the business from 1859 on. During the run on the banks of 1857, Peabody had to ask the Bank of England for a loan of £800,000: although rivals tried to force the bank out of business, it managed to emerge with its credit intact. "Following this crisis, Peabody began to retire from active business, and in 1864, retired fully (taking with him much of his capital, amounting to over $10,000,000, or £2,000,000). Peabody, Morgan & Co. then took the name J.S. Morgan & Co. The former UK merchant bank Morgan Grenfell (now part of Deutsche Bank), international universal bank JPMorgan Chase and investment bank Morgan Stanley can all trace their roots to Peabody's bank." Also, JP Morgan was very close with Barings, one of the most corrupt British banks to exist. "A fall off in business and some poor leadership in 1820s caused Barings to cede its dominance in the City of London to the rival firm of N M Rothschild & Sons. Barings remained a powerful firm, however, and in the 1830s the leadership of new American partner Joshua Bates, together with Thomas Baring, son of Sir Thomas Baring, 2nd Baronet, began a turnaround. Bates advocated a shift in Barings' efforts from Europe to the Americas, believing that greater opportunity lay in the West. In 1832, a Barings office was established in Liverpool specifically to capitalize on new North American opportunities. In 1843, Barings became exclusive agent to the US government, a position they held until 1871." Also, pay careful attention to the mention of Morgan's yacht parties and who was on board. It wasn't just bankers and businessmen. How do you control those men? Blackmail, by threatening to expose their affairs? The City of London's octopus at work. Morgan was their yes man. Roosevelt didn't really bust the trusts. He finagled a way for them to be split up but allowed the same wealthy elite to control them. A good example was Standard Oil. One will find that Roosevelt was very friendly with the "progressive" members of the Reform Club in London, as well as members within the Trinity Church and the Pilgrims Society in Manhattan. He got on well with Dirty Bertie when the king came to the US. (Quotes from Wikipedia articles.)
    3
  3867. 3
  3868. 3
  3869. 3
  3870. 3
  3871. 3
  3872. 3
  3873. 3
  3874. 3
  3875. 3
  3876. 3
  3877. 3
  3878. 3
  3879. 3
  3880. 3
  3881. 3
  3882. 3
  3883. 3
  3884. 3
  3885. 3
  3886. 3
  3887. 3
  3888. 3
  3889. 3
  3890. 3
  3891. 3
  3892. 3
  3893. 3
  3894. 3
  3895. 3
  3896. 3
  3897. 3
  3898. 3
  3899. 3
  3900. 3
  3901. 3
  3902. 3
  3903. 3
  3904. 3
  3905. 3
  3906. 3
  3907. 3
  3908. 3
  3909. 3
  3910. 3
  3911. 3
  3912. 3
  3913. 3
  3914. 3
  3915. 3
  3916. 3
  3917. 3
  3918. 3
  3919. 3
  3920. 3
  3921. 3
  3922. 3
  3923. 3
  3924. Funny that religion is brought up by the left, when it was religion, the Unitarians and similar, which led to radical left-wing thought. I also highly doubt that the left, today, can tell you the difference between classical liberalism, and what they consider liberalism, nor do they know the truth behind the founding of the Democrats. Worse, there are many on the left that attend the churches of several religions, especially Roman Catholicism, and the black community with the Baptists or Islam. . The GOP changed when Eisenhower was talked into running by Dewey, who was a globalist. Robert Taft was the last real Republican, and was known as "Mr. Republican." Taft wanted the US free of foreign entanglements, and was anti-globalist. Dewey, Ike, and Nixon were all globalists that pushed for the creation of the UN, and a cooperation with the ex-Nazis and mafioso ('Ndrangheta), just as many Democrats did. The UN is an Anglo-American project, whereby the US would be at its head, and be the "big brother" of Europe. It's why Ike was knighted in the Order of the Bath. Out of that came NATO, the WTO, and the Atlantic and Pacific Councils, which push globalism. The leftists haven't figured it out, yet, that no matter who you voted for, after Ike, except for JFK and Trump, you got the same beast, in either D or R. . Tricky Dick, as VP, was given the job of creating the darkest clandestine group in the new C_A, called Operation 40 and the 40 Committee, which has been renamed several times. This group is where Nixon's plumbers came from, as well as operations like Iran-Contra. It's the same Anglo-American operation, today, behind the riots, the election interference, the Russian hoax, and spying on every GOP candidate. Since JFK, President Trump has been the only one to tackle them, and that is why they want him out of office. The mafia and neo-Nazi connection with the anti-Trump crowd is huge. Globalists, Neocons, Neoliberals, and Progressives are all the same beast, yet, they wonder why we voted for Trump.
    3
  3925. 3
  3926. 3
  3927. 3
  3928. "Although there are genetic, behavioral and hormonal influences on body weight, obesity occurs when you take in more calories than you burn through exercise and normal daily activities. Your body stores these excess calories as fat. "Obesity can sometimes be traced to a medical cause, such as Prader-Willi syndrome, Cushing's syndrome, and other diseases and conditions."__Mayo Clinic ==== Obesity affects some groups more than others Read CDC National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) data brief "Hispanics (47.0%) and non-Hispanic blacks (46.8%) had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of obesity, followed by non-Hispanic whites (37.9%) and non-Hispanic Asians (12.7%). "The prevalence of obesity was 35.7% among young adults aged 20 to 39 years, 42.8% among middle-aged adults aged 40 to 59 years, and 41.0% among older adults aged 60 and older."__CDC & Do Genes Have a Role in Obesity? "In recent decades, obesity has reached epidemic proportions in populations whose environments promote physical inactivity and increased consumption of high-calorie foods. However, not all people living in such environments will become obese, nor will all obese people have the same body fat distribution or suffer the same health problems. These differences can be seen in groups of people with the same racial or ethnic background and even within families. Genetic changes in human populations occur too slowly to be responsible for the obesity epidemic. Nevertheless, the variation in how people respond to the same environment suggests that genes do play a role in the development of obesity." How Could Genes Influence Obesity? "Genes give the body instructions for responding to changes in its environment. Studies of resemblances and differences among family members, twins, and adoptees offer indirect scientific evidence that a sizable portion of the variation in weight among adults is due to genetic factors. Other studies have compared obese and non-obese people for variation in genes that could influence behaviors (such as a drive to overeat, or a tendency to be sedentary) or metabolism (such as a diminished capacity to use dietary fats as fuel, or an increased tendency to store body fat). These studies have identified variants in several genes that may contribute to obesity by increasing hunger and food intake. "Rarely, a clear pattern of inherited obesity within a family is caused by a specific variant of a single gene (monogenic obesity). Most obesity, however, probably results from complex interactions among multiple genes and environmental factors that remain poorly understood (multifactorial obesity). "Any explanation of the obesity epidemic has to consider both genetics and the environment. One explanation that is often cited is the mismatch between today’s environment and “energy-thrifty genes” that multiplied in the distant past, when food sources were unpredictable. In other words, according to the “thrifty genotype” hypothesis, the same genes that helped our ancestors survive occasional famines are now being challenged by environments in which food is plentiful year round. Other hypotheses have been proposed including a role for the gut microbiome as well as early life exposures associated with epigenetic changes."__CDC ==== There is no denying that genetics plays a role in a portion of the population, where the intake of food causes obesity in certain ethnic groups.
    3
  3929. 3
  3930. 3
  3931. 3
  3932. 3
  3933. 3
  3934. 3
  3935. 3
  3936. 3
  3937. 3
  3938. 3
  3939. 3
  3940. 3
  3941. 3
  3942. 3
  3943. 3
  3944. 3
  3945. 3
  3946. 3
  3947. 3
  3948. 3
  3949. 3
  3950. 3
  3951. 3
  3952. George Washington on foreign entanglements: "Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. ... In the execution of such a plan nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. "So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country without odium, sometimes even with popularity, gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation. "Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests. "The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. ... "Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand, neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the Government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that by such acceptance it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard."
    3
  3953. 3
  3954. 3
  3955. 3
  3956. 3
  3957. 3
  3958. 3
  3959. 3
  3960. 3
  3961. 3
  3962. 3
  3963. 3
  3964. 3
  3965. 3
  3966. 3
  3967. 3
  3968. 3
  3969. 3
  3970. 3
  3971. 3
  3972. 3
  3973. 3
  3974. 3
  3975. 3
  3976. 3
  3977. 3
  3978. 3
  3979. 3
  3980. 3
  3981. 3
  3982. 3
  3983. 3
  3984. 3
  3985. 3
  3986. 3
  3987. 3
  3988. 3
  3989. 3
  3990. 3
  3991. 3
  3992. 3
  3993. 3
  3994. 3
  3995. 3
  3996. 3
  3997. 3
  3998. 3
  3999. 3
  4000. 3
  4001. ​ @taylorc2542  Doing their jobs by stopping the spread of the Soviets. It was over the Church Committee, which came about due to communist activists stealing classified files, and making them public. That was what also later helped bring the School of the Americas down at Fort Benning. Carter claimed that new technology, which were computers and early satellites, would replace feet on the ground as the excuse. It didn't replace them, and it damaged the US. Remember the moniker that Comey used on Twitter, with the initials of RN? That man, with those initials, was a Trotsky following progressive pastor, and a professor at Columbia U with Dewey that taught the New York Intellectuals with the Frankfurt School professors, who had ideological followers consisting of Clinton, Humphrey, Acheson, Comey, Albright, McCain, Obama, and Carter. I'd bet both Bushes, and Cheney were as well. Think C Street. Comey stated in the New Yorker, that he had once been a communist, but claimed that he didn't know what he was now. He's a Trotskyite WASP. These same Trotskyites had infested the CIA early on, and all claimed to be anti-communists, when in reality, they were only anti-Stalinists, and against what they called "Soviet Socialism." Trotskyism is still a brand of Lenin's communism. Dewey even travelled to Mexico to "prove Trotsky's innocence" over the claims of Stalin. Stalin had Trotsky eliminated shortly after. This is the real roots of neoconservatism, as they were leftists that claimed to quit the D Party over Stalin.
    3
  4002. 3
  4003. 3
  4004. 3
  4005. Fred Compusmurf: Many do not remember Trump testing the waters in 1999 by running under the Reform Party. Perot refused to run, and there was a reason. The party had been hijacked by a cabal from the far-left and far-right. When Trump quickly left it, he outed them on the Today Show in 2000. "Trump considered himself a conservative, but criticized Pat Buchanan, saying: 'I'm on the conservative side, but Buchanan is Attila the Hun.' He withdrew from the race citing the party's infighting, as did Jesse Ventura and the Minnesota Reform Party. Donald Trump stated: 'So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.'" "Pat Buchanan decided to leave the Republican Party because: 'The Republican Party at the national level has ceased to be my party. This divorce began around the end of the Cold War when President (George H W) Bush declared it to be a New World-order party and began intervening all over the world. While he and I were allies and friends during the Cold War, I just felt that once the Cold War was over the United States should return to a more traditional non-intervention foreign policy.'" Buchanan went back into the Republican Party, and is still close to the Bush family, all supporters of the far-right national socialist movement, or neo-nazis. Today, they call this alliance, which still exists, the Red-Green-Brown Alliance. It is the Red (communist), Green (Environmentalists), and Brown (Nazi/Islam) Alliance. This same alliance was mentioned in an article about the CFR. One needs to remember, that the UN was finalized by Eisenhower and Nixon. When Nixon became president, he sent the Rockefellers and Kissinger to China, and he devalued the dollar. He was involved in the creation of the "Library Group," which later became the G20. He was also behind expanding the counterintelligence group started by Johnson. This is the same COINTELPRO that Strzok was in, which is tied to the C_A operation that I will not name. It was the assassin operation that came from the Bay of Pigs. This is what Trump warned of in his 2016 Florida campaign speech. The UN/G20/China cabal. They are who interfered in the 2016 election, and have tried to remove him since then. Both Ds and Rs.
    3
  4006. 3
  4007. 3
  4008. 3
  4009. 3
  4010. 3
  4011. 3
  4012. 3
  4013. 3
  4014. 3
  4015. 3
  4016. 3
  4017. 3
  4018. 3
  4019. 3
  4020. 3
  4021. 3
  4022. 3
  4023. 3
  4024. 3
  4025. 3
  4026. 3
  4027. 3
  4028. 3
  4029. 3
  4030. 3
  4031. 3
  4032. 3
  4033. 3
  4034. 3
  4035. 3
  4036. 3
  4037. 3
  4038. 3
  4039. 3
  4040. 3
  4041. 3
  4042. 3
  4043.  @Nunya_Bidness_53  From the book: Paul, a Hellenistic Jew?: Paul's Youth and Early Years, by Peter van 't Riet "Many scholars and readers of the Bible have a romantic image of Paul: born in a pious Jewish family, educated in Jerusalem at the feet of the famous Pharisaic scholar Gamliel and fluently speaking Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek and Latin. However, does this fit in with the data from the genuine letters of Paul? In this book, the author shows that the above-mentioned image of Paul is especially derived from the Acts of the Apostles, in which the evangelist Luke has adapted the image of Paul to his own almost Pharisaic idea of the messianic time. In contrast, however, Paul himself presents a completely different Christology (doctrine about Christ) in his letters. His language and way of thinking are more cognate with the Hellenistic, Greek-speaking Judaism of his days. The author discusses successively: 1) Hellenism, the dominant culture of the Greek-Roman world of those days; 2) the Hellenistic Judaism of the Diaspora, which differed greatly from the Aramaic Judaism of Jesus and his early disciples; 3) the Septuagint, the Greek Bible translation, which had already existed about 300 years in the days of Paul and which deviated in many respects from the Hebrew Bible. Next, the author researches what of these three phenomena could be found in the letters of Paul. Which turned out to be a lot more than he presumed at the start of his research. The Hellenistic Judaism is so intertwined with Paul’s thought that the most obvious conclusion is that Paul has spent his youth and early years in a Hellenistic-Jewish milieu. This background clarifies many difficult passages in the letters of Paul and leads to a better understanding of his theology."
    3
  4044. 3
  4045. 3
  4046. 3
  4047. 3
  4048. 3
  4049. 3
  4050. 3
  4051.  @redprince3158  Two things are driving it. The first is that man built cities too close to the sea as ports, and as the northern ice cap melts, the sea has steadily risen over twelve thousand years. Places like Hamburg, Venice, Amsterdam, and New Orleans, as well as many atolls and small islands are now feeling the bite, and they want to make the public pay for saving them. The second is that all the western nation's social spending has bankrupted them, and their fiat money scheme is about to crash. They want another industrial revolution (green) to try to pull us out of it, and shore up socialism. However, they put all that manufacturing in China's hands. Solution: Use the next warming cycle (now), after coming out of the "Little Ice Age," and claim that CO2 is now leading and not lagging as an excuse to cry that the sky is falling. They only project a rise higher than +2 deg C over supposedly leading CO2, but they do not know. Their claim, as made by OSS: "Is global warming a natural cycle? Or is global warming affected by human influence? What does the science say? Both are true. In the natural cycle, the world can warm, and cool, without any human interference. For the past million years this has occurred over and over again at approximately 100,000 year intervals. About 80-90,000 years of ice age with about 10-20,000 years of warm period, give or take some thousands of years." "The difference is that in the natural cycle CO2 lags behind the warming because it is mainly due to the Milankovitch cycles. Now CO2 is leading the warming. Current warming is clearly not natural cycle." The above has been disputed by several academics, who they've muzzled.
    3
  4052. 3
  4053. 3
  4054. 3
  4055. 3
  4056. 3
  4057. 3
  4058. 3
  4059. 3
  4060. 3
  4061. 3
  4062. 3
  4063. 3
  4064. 3
  4065. 3
  4066. 3
  4067. 3
  4068. 3
  4069. 3
  4070. 3
  4071. 3
  4072. 3
  4073. 3
  4074. 3
  4075. 3
  4076. 3
  4077. 3
  4078. 3
  4079. 3
  4080. 3
  4081. 3
  4082. 3
  4083. 3
  4084. 3
  4085. 3
  4086. 3
  4087. 3
  4088. 3
  4089. 3
  4090. 3
  4091. 3
  4092. 3
  4093. 3
  4094. 3
  4095. 3
  4096. 3
  4097. 3
  4098.  Trevor Guthrie  I read a political article several years ago, but I can't remember where, that said the forces of both national and international socialism had joined forces within the CFR. That would explain how they joined forces, and infiltrated Perot's Reform Party, as well as the D and R. Trump admitted in that NYT interview, that he merely used the Reform Party to try his hand at politics. He quickly learned what was within it, and left, along with Ventura, stating that he wanted nothing to do with it. In 2016, we saw the same people form together under the D Party, with the likes of Obama, HRC, and Bernie. Once Trump was in office, starting in June 2017, indictments and arrests started occurring, nailing the likes of of these crackpots, who were also tied to the Russian mob, and the Levant. If they seem cultish, one only needs to read about Fred Newman. The press considered his group a cult of socialist extremists. There was a sexual aspect of this cult as well. Jesse Jackson was involved with this lot, from what I found, and I'd say Obama was as well. Some can't grasp the politics in the Levant, where there are hard left and hard right beliefs. After all, how could someone from there believe in National Socialism, but some did, and still do. Think RM, GM, and JE. The Internationalists/communists were within the first settlers, who started the kibbutzim. The national socialists came in later on, and they were friendly with the Arabs over the old Ottoman Empire, which had sided with Germany. This lot was also tied to Central and South America, as well as the Caribbean, and they had many friends within the US and what became the Russian mob. There is a middle or moderate politic there as well, which is similar to US beliefs.
    3
  4099. 3
  4100. 3
  4101. 3
  4102. 3
  4103. 3
  4104. 3
  4105. 3
  4106. 3
  4107. 3
  4108. 3
  4109. 3
  4110. 3
  4111. 3
  4112.  @morgothofkrynn656  It's according to which circuit the case falls in, and how the judges are stacked. The Ninth Circuit causes the most problems, and has the most left-wing (activist) judges. Many hoped it would be broken up into several smaller circuits under President Trump, but it never occurred. It's where California will push cases protecting DACA. "In November 2014, President Obama announced his intention to expand DACA to cover additional undocumented immigrants. Multiple states immediately sued to prevent the expansion, which was ultimately blocked by an evenly divided Supreme Court. Under President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security rescinded the expansion in June 2017, while it continued to review the existence of DACA as a whole. In September 2017, the Trump Administration announced a plan to phase out DACA, triggering multiple lawsuits challenging this action. The government deferred implementation of this plan for six months to allow Congress time to pass the DREAM Act or some other legislative protection for undocumented immigrants. Congress failed to act and the time extension expired on March 5, 2018, but three separate district courts ordered an injunction preventing the phase-out of the DACA by this date, on the likelihood that the rescinding was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Separately, district court judge Andrew Hanen of the Southern District of Texas ruled that DACA is likely unconstitutional, but he let the program remain in place as litigation proceeds."__Wikipedia on DACA
    3
  4113. 3
  4114. 3
  4115. 3
  4116. 3
  4117. 3
  4118. 3
  4119. 3
  4120. 3
  4121. 3
  4122. 3
  4123. 3
  4124. 3
  4125. 3
  4126. 3
  4127. 3
  4128. 3
  4129. 3
  4130. That was one of the best exposés that I've had the pleasure of listening to. The problem is, that we have many in government, today, with those very beliefs, and they fully intend on dragging the west into their disastrous system even deeper. "Keynesian economics, as part of the neoclassical synthesis, served as the standard macroeconomic model in the developed nations during the later part of the Great Depression, World War II, and the post-war economic expansion (1945–1973). It lost some influence following the oil shock and resulting stagflation of the 1970s. Keynesian economics was later redeveloped as New Keynesian economics, becoming part of the contemporary new neoclassical synthesis, that forms one current-day theory on macroeconomics. The advent of the financial crisis of 2007–2008 sparked renewed interest in Keynesian thought." -- Wikipedia Then, there is this: "Keynes, a British economist who died more than 60 years ago, inspired President Barack Obama's plan to save the U.S. economy with a massive round of government spending. The British economist published his big theory, the one underpinning most of what Obama intends to do, in 1936. "By the 1980s, many believed Keynes' ideas were utterly discredited. But he is the man who came up with the then-radical notion that a government can pull a country out of a deep recession by spending a lot." -- NPR article: Obama Gives Keynes His First Real-World Test (Jan. 2009) Of course, we had the Bush family do something very similar, and now, in 2022, we've spent trillions more.
    3
  4131. 3
  4132. 3
  4133. 3
  4134. 3
  4135. 3
  4136. Ask yourself why Christopher Steele, who Britain claimed was on a Russian hit list, had barroom friends who were Russian oligarchs, which were very close with Putin, and why was his company, Orbis, sub-contracted by a law firm representing Oleg Deripaska? "Until 2018, he [Deripaska] was the president of En+ Group, a Russian energy company, and until 2018 headed United Company Rusal, the second-largest aluminium company in the world." Also, ask yourself why "Steele has refrained from travelling to the United States since his identity became public, citing the political and legal situation?" Last, ask yourself who Orbis' customers are. Does he do work for people within the G20, the EU, and private companies on energy projects? What about energy projects in China, Ukraine, and Russia? What is counterintelligence? Steele was a counterintelligence specialist. COINTELPRO and COIN. What did Strzok do at the FBI? McCain and Clinton: "In September 2015, the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative publication, retained the services of Fusion GPS, a private Washington D.C. political research firm, to conduct research on several primary Republican Party candidates including Trump. The research was not primarily related to Russia and was ended once Trump was determined to be the presidential nominee." How many GOP candidates were spied on by Steele? McCain handed it off the Clinton. China, UN, and G8/G20 connections of Deripaska: "Deripaska is one of the 16 global business leaders who drafted CEO Climate Policy Recommendations to G8 Leaders, a document outlining the international business community's proposals to tackle global warming. The proposals were signed by more than 100 of the world's leading corporations and handed to the Prime Minister of Japan Yasuo Fukuda on 20 June 2008. The G8 leaders discussed the recommendations during the summit in Japan on 7–9 July 2008. The process was coordinated by the World Economic Forum in collaboration with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. "Deripaska actively advocates cutting the global carbon footprint and calls for the creation of an enforcement mechanism with consequences for countries that do not reduce carbon-intensive emissions, such as those produced by coal-fired powerplants. He also remains a strong advocate of a legally binding climate change deal, but has publicly voiced concern about the potential competitive impact of a Paris climate agreement and also about the absence of binding measures to curb each country's emissions in the near future. "Everyone is in favour; we just need to have more or less fair regulation. There shouldn't be any pockets where people can cheat the system. People shouldn't agree on something that creates another Kyoto protocol that creates nice polished statements", he told the Financial Times in January 2016. "EuroSibEnergo controls and manages 18 power plants with a combined installed energy capacity of 19.5 GW, including 15 GW provided by hydrogeneration. The company produces approximately 9% of all electricity in Russia and is also the leader in the Siberian energy market, with a market share totaling 41%. Some of EuroSibEnergo's key clients include the largest aluminum plants in Russia. The company owns large fuel resources, which satisfy over 85% of the coal needs of its thermal power and boiler plants. Its coal reserves amount to 1.26 billion tons, with annual coal production exceeding 12 million tons. "En+ Group, of which EuroSibEnergo is a subsidiary, is investing in a joint venture with China's largest hydroelectric power generation company China Yangtze Power Co to build new power plants in Siberia, primarily hydroelectric ones, with a total capacity of up to 10 GWt." Welcome to the globalist cabal known as the G20/UN.
    3
  4137. 3
  4138. 3
  4139. 3
  4140. 3
  4141. 3
  4142. 3
  4143. 3
  4144. 3
  4145. 3
  4146. 3
  4147. 3
  4148. 3
  4149. 3
  4150. 3
  4151. 3
  4152. 3
  4153. 3
  4154. 3
  4155. 3
  4156. 3
  4157. 3
  4158. 3
  4159. 3
  4160. 3
  4161. 3
  4162. 3
  4163. 3
  4164. 3
  4165. 3
  4166. 3
  4167. 3
  4168. 3
  4169. 3
  4170. 3
  4171. 3
  4172. 3
  4173. 3
  4174. 3
  4175. 3
  4176. 3
  4177. 3
  4178. 3
  4179. 3
  4180. 3
  4181. Warrior of the Light: It is all about China, or the China cabal (China, Russia, Iran, and NK). During the Clinton-Gore campaign, it came out that China was funding their campaign. Under Clinton and Blair, (1997-2001) talks were had, with China, to admit them into the WTO. Just as GW Bush became president, in 2001, China was allowed in, as the talks were supposedly a success. China likes spreading around a lot of money to politicians who promote them, as well as at the UN. The history, though, leads back to the Group of Five, which later became the G7, and that leads to the G20. Look for the politicians, in both nations, who have been promoting China since Clinton and Blair. "The concept of a forum for the world's major industrialized countries emerged before the 1973 oil crisis. On Sunday, 25 March 1973, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, George Shultz, convened an informal gathering of finance ministers from West Germany Helmut Schmidt, France Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, and the United Kingdom Anthony Barber before an upcoming meeting in Washington, D.C. When running the idea past President Nixon, he noted that he would be out of town and offered use of the White House. The meeting was subsequently held in the library on the ground floor. Taking their name from the setting, this original group of four became known as the "Library Group". In mid-1973, at the World Bank-IMF meetings, Shultz proposed the addition of Japan to the original four nations, who agreed. The informal gathering of senior financial officials from the United States, the United Kingdom, West Germany, Japan, and France became known as the 'Group of Five.'" Follow the history here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Seven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_World_Trade_Organization However, we can now see that China never changed its spots, they actually became worse, and the politicians turned a blind eye to what China has been doing. We were sold out by the progressives, in both parties, and in both nations.
    3
  4182. 3
  4183. 3
  4184. 3
  4185. 3
  4186. 3
  4187. 3
  4188. 3
  4189. 3
  4190. 3
  4191. 3
  4192. As I commented to Simon, many of the fallacies have been spread from the church pulpit concerning this in the US, as the group in mention has a stronger religious conviction than do white people in the US. The NOI is one example, and there are certain celebrity pastors guilty of spreading it as well. However, this is becoming better than it was, as their community has started to catch on. There are many whites in the US that end up falling for certain theories as well. As an example, during and after the 2016 election, many were following a certain anon on 8chan, and if one carefully read what this person had to say, you could tell it was a psyop from the D Party, and that it would help a certain female candidate. They even admitted it through two of their posts, which pointed toward her. The D Party, of course, tried to claim that it was from the opposite party, and if it was, it was from the neoconservatives who are leftists. The same goes for the group: Anonymous. Both appeared and were spreading propaganda during Pres. 44's term. This occurred as well with those that became the intolerant rioters, and they were educated, with some being professors. Many, I believe, have caught on that they were played here as well; especially after the election. The US Govt. is not one that I would trust to produce this type of research, as they began using the phrase "conspiracy theory," purposely, to discredit the public during the Warren Commission over the press and certain books that were quickly published. That came out in their own documentation, which was released later on after a congressional committee found that there was a conspiracy behind it in 1979, except they did not know who the others were, though they had several guesses. New documents, which were just released, show that the government's investigative agencies weren't sure even after the original Warren Commission report was released, where a few agencies kept the case open for several years afterward. The documents also stated that the Commission made a mistake in their conclusion. After I dug into why they did not want Pres. 45 in office, I found out that it had international involvement (G7) because he was against the idea of a transatlantic union (Federalism / Atlantic Union) from the start, which would also affect the UN and NATO. We could witness this in his actions after the fact, as well as the foreign involvement. He also renegotiated NAFTA and targeted China and the Paris Agreement. Several prominent think tanks have now published articles about how they hope to reverse course and bring the US back into the want of a transatlantic union.
    3
  4193. 3
  4194. 3
  4195. 3
  4196. 3
  4197. 3
  4198. 3
  4199. 3
  4200. 3
  4201. 3
  4202. 3
  4203. 3
  4204. 3
  4205. 3
  4206. 3
  4207. 3
  4208. 3
  4209. 3
  4210. 3
  4211. 3
  4212. 3
  4213. 3
  4214. 3
  4215. 3
  4216. 3
  4217. 3
  4218. 3
  4219. 3
  4220. 3
  4221. 3
  4222. 3
  4223. 3
  4224. 3
  4225. 3
  4226. 3
  4227. 3
  4228. 3
  4229. 3
  4230. 3
  4231. 3
  4232. 3
  4233. 3
  4234. 3
  4235. 3
  4236. 3
  4237. 3
  4238. 3
  4239. 3
  4240. 3
  4241. 3
  4242. 3
  4243. 3
  4244. 3
  4245. 3
  4246. 3
  4247. 3
  4248. 3
  4249. 3
  4250. 3
  4251. 3
  4252. 3
  4253. 3
  4254. 3
  4255. 3
  4256. 3
  4257. 3
  4258. 3
  4259. 3
  4260. 3
  4261. 3
  4262. 3
  4263. 3
  4264. 3
  4265. 3
  4266. 3
  4267. 3
  4268. 3
  4269. 3
  4270. 3
  4271. 3
  4272. 3
  4273. 3
  4274. 3
  4275. 3
  4276. 3
  4277. 3
  4278. 3
  4279. 3
  4280. 3
  4281. 3
  4282. 3
  4283. 3
  4284. 3
  4285. 3
  4286. 3
  4287. 3
  4288. 3
  4289. When you mentioned allowing the leftists to rant, there is and old saying that matches that, which is: "give them enough rope, and they will hang themselves." I do that all the time. Then, when you question them, they hardly ever have anything close to a credible answer, if any answer at all. Two of my favorites, are when they call Trump a racist or Steve Bannon an anti-Semite, when I have never heard Trump utter one truly racist comment, and there are more Jews working at Breitbart than you can shake a stick at. When one points to the evidence against it, the leftists always go off the deep end. Their lunatic theory, is that Trump is a racist because he hired Bannon, and Bannon is an anti-Semite, because he wanted his child to attend a Catholic school instead of a Jewish school. His ex-wife, Mary Louise Piccard, made a bunch of statements during their divorce, where she did her best to make him look bad in order to win a good bit of money. If he hated Jews as she claimed, he worked with many, and they have all had many good things to state about him. Any, who have went through a divorce, know how vindictive a woman can be. I sure do. There is a video out, that promotes today's millennial leftists to a tee. It was shot at a lecture hall, where a rather plump girl, (probably 300 pounds), tried to do an imitation of the fat child and the "peanut butter and jelly time" jingle. She performed her defiant act, flapping arms and all, over her disagreement with freedom of speech. I guess they needed to take her to a safe space, and give her time with a therapy dog and crayons afterwards. It was quite the psychotic display of a full-blown temper tantrum, that any three year old would be proud of.
    2
  4290. 2
  4291. 2
  4292. 2
  4293. 2
  4294. 2
  4295. 2
  4296. David Stewart Oh Ayers and Dohrn, et al, did. That is what they call "political correctness". If anyone states a fact, such as mentioning the words "radical Islamic terrorists", then they were taught to retort that they are fascists, bigots, xenophobes, etc. That was even taught by Saul Alinsky, a Marxist, in his "Twelve Rules for Radicals". Twelve Rules for Radicals: RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Next, Saul Alinsky”s inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg Time magazine wrote, in 1970, that "It is not too much to argue that American democracy is being altered by Alinsky's ideas." Hillary idolized Alinsky, and wrote her senior thesis on his work, with Alinsky helping. She corresponded with him until his death, which came out in published letters. Alinsky spread that first in Chicago, then to New York, California, and several other large metro cities. Bill Ayers loved citing Alinsky. Sanford Horwitt wrote that "U.S. President Barack Obama was influenced by Alinsky and followed in his footsteps as a Chicago-based community organizer. Horwitt asserted that Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign was influenced by Alinsky's teachings." Also, see here: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/02/bill_ayers_and_obama_both_quote_alinsky.html There are many other examples, and the above does not really expose all the means of doing it, but it is taught, especially within student societies. Like I stated, Mark Levin exposed some of it recently. Heck, some of this even taught for debate and rhetoric, but they make good use of it for politics. Anyhow, compare that to Obama and the Clinton's actions and rhetoric.
    2
  4297. 2
  4298. 2
  4299. 2
  4300. 2
  4301. 2
  4302. 2
  4303. 2
  4304. 2
  4305. 2
  4306. 2
  4307. 2
  4308. 2
  4309. 2
  4310. 2
  4311. 2
  4312. 2
  4313. 2
  4314. FUqer That's what Alinsky was fond of doing in order to hide what he truly was. He tried to distract people from labeling him, but he pretty much admitted to everything in Playboy and in his own writing. Alinsky had deep ties to the Communist Party within the US, and claimed to be friends with those such as Frank Marshall Davis (who some think was Obama's real father), and the professors who came here from the Frankfurt School. Plus, we can't forget two of his prodigy, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. Hillary Clinton idolized Alinsky. Two others were Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Alinsky taught Piven, before she ended up at Columbia U. During Alinsky's time was when the crackdown on communism was taking place, and many true communists denied their involvement. When the Venona Papers came out, many names were outed, even Robert Oppenheimer. At that, only about 5% of those papers were ever deciphered. After studying Joe McCarthy, I found that the left did their best to vilify the man, because they had been infiltrated. I have heard many try to claim that McCarthy started the House Un-American Activities Committee, when in fact, it was a Democrat who stated it before him. After the Venona Papers came out, it was found that McCarthy was actually correct in most cases, that he had missed many, and some of those consisted of his accusers. During FDR's time in office, names of people in the White House came up in those papers, and the State Dept. was loaded full of them. One of the communist's tricks was to always deny any involvement, and try to label their enemies as something derogatory, such as racists, bigots, etc. Alinsky, of course, wrote about how to do this very thing in Rules for Radicals. When I hear people, especially in government, try to claim that communism is dead, or that it no longer exists, they are either extremely naive, or trying to cover it up. China is still communist, along with North Korea, and Russia has it hid away within its government yet. In my opinion, Germany has them within, now, along with the EU. Nigel Farage outed a few during his speeches.
    2
  4315. 2
  4316. 2
  4317. 2
  4318. 2
  4319. 2
  4320. 2
  4321. 2
  4322. 2
  4323. 2
  4324. 2
  4325. 2
  4326. 2
  4327. 2
  4328. 2
  4329. 2
  4330. 2
  4331. 2
  4332. 2
  4333. 2
  4334. 2
  4335. 2
  4336. 2
  4337. 2
  4338. 2
  4339. 2
  4340. 2
  4341. 2
  4342. 2
  4343. Ken Tell another lie, as I have read the entirety. Firearms were for protecting the US from invasion, and to protect the people from a tyrannical government. “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”– Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788 “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…”– George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790 “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”– Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776 “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787 “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787 “The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”– Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776 ” The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent, (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of the press.”– Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”– Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.”– George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788 “I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”– George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788 “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.”– Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787 “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.”– James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788 “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.”– James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789 “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms…  “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”– Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788 “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.”– Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778 “This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty…. The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.”– St. George Tucker, Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803 “The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance of power is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves.”– Thomas Paine, “Thoughts on Defensive War” in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775 I can continue with many more quotes. Your leftist views do not hold water, and leak like a sieve.
    2
  4344. 2
  4345. 2
  4346. 2
  4347. 2
  4348. 2
  4349. 2
  4350. 2
  4351. 2
  4352. 2
  4353. 2
  4354. 2
  4355. 2
  4356. 2
  4357. 2
  4358. 2
  4359. 2
  4360. 2
  4361. 2
  4362. 2
  4363. 2
  4364. 2
  4365. 2
  4366. 2
  4367. 2
  4368. 2
  4369. 2
  4370. 2
  4371. Morality and chivalry are dead on the left. To this day, I open doors for women, make way for them, and am polite, no matter the race, nor whether a feminist hates it or not. The left has lost all sense of morality, and to be honest, the ones who write this muck, such as Greg Howard, have many tells which show them to be a sociopath. For that matter, most of the Democrats actions show them to be sociopaths. Sociopathy: Grandiose sense of self. They think that they are entitled to things, and claim them as their own. They think that it is their right to do so. The think that they are somehow special. When confronted, they don't find anything wrong with their actions. They can manipulatively turn the tables, making it sound as if others are the selfish ones. They have a sense of self-righteousness. They are mischievous, cunning, and have behavioral problems. A sociopath lies so often that it becomes a part of their personality. They appear to be satisfied by their anti-social behavior. They're irresponsible and unreliable. They are not interested in others lives, needs, or others safety. They're oblivious to the damage they cause. They quickly accuse others of being guilty, even though the action is of their own doing. They lack realist visions of the future. Poor behavioral controls, and an impulsive nature. They switch between peace and rage. They are guilty of violent assaults on other people They are unable to feel guilt, shame, or remorse. They think that the ends justify the means. They have no problem causing devastation to others, as long as they reach their outcome. They have shallow emotions and lack empathy. Compare that to the recent actions of those who claim to be Democrats.
    2
  4372. 2
  4373. 2
  4374. 2
  4375. 2
  4376. 2
  4377. 2
  4378. 2
  4379. 2
  4380. 2
  4381. 2
  4382. 2
  4383. 2
  4384. Rusty Clifford What they'll try to argue is that 1100 is a huge number. However, that is a very small, actually minute, percentile of the total children in the US, who could use a gun, and are residing in homes with guns. We're speaking of 1100 out of hundreds of millions. On top of that, it is the parents fault, in those cases, for leaving a gun accessible to small children. These lefties remind me of the tinfoil hat wearing, nutter conspiracy theorists and hoaxers, who try to quote words and numbers out of context, and use them as scare tactics. When you check their sources, you find they're lying through their teeth, when compared to reliable data. They are no better than the neo-Nazi anti-Semites, who spread lies about the Jews. They remind me of Hal Hunt, from the 1960s, and Robert Welch's John Birch Society, who claimed many fallacies about both FDR and Truman. They're Goebbels propagandists, trying to push their low percentile opinions on the greater masses. The FBI's statistics clearly show, that not only has small children who harmed others, with guns, continually dropped over the last twenty years, but that violent crime, especially home intrusions, have dropped as gun ownership has risen during that time. That clearly shows that the lefties are telling one bare faced lie after another. Yet, you get those, like this Ana and her henchmen, who sit there, smugly, spieling one fallacy after another. The idiots who believe them, are either to lazy to look up the truth for themselves, or they are liars too.
    2
  4385. 2
  4386. 2
  4387. 2
  4388. 2
  4389. 2
  4390. 2
  4391. 2
  4392. 2
  4393. 2
  4394. 2
  4395. 2
  4396. 2
  4397. 2
  4398. 2
  4399. 2
  4400. 2
  4401. 2
  4402. 2
  4403. 2
  4404. 2
  4405. 2
  4406. 2
  4407. 2
  4408. 2
  4409. 2
  4410. 2
  4411. 2
  4412. 2
  4413. 2
  4414. 2
  4415. 2
  4416. 2
  4417. 2
  4418. 2
  4419. The word, devil, is bastardized Greek by the early German translators. They were trying to translate and pronounce the Greek word, Diabolous, that in English is Diabolic or Diabolical, which means a deceiver or a liar. There are three words in the KJV Bible, that are purposely not translated into English, and two in the Catholic version. The first word is Satan, which is a Hebrew word, and as a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. Satan was not the angels name in Job, as it was written as "ha-satan" in Hebrew that means "the satan," which was the job title that God gave the angel. The angel's name is unknown. In Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. In Matthew 16:22-23, Jesus called Peter a satan (adversary) and a stumbling block, he was not calling him a fallen angel or demon. Mainstream Rabbinical Judaism, that of the Pharisees, has never believed in a fallen angel named Satan. This myth was started by Persian Zoroastrianism and the Greco-Romans. The second word was Devil, which was discussed above. The third word, which only appears once in the KJV, is Lucifer. Lucifer is a Latin word, which means Morning Star, Son of the Morning, Light Bearer, and the planet Venus. It was used several times in the Latin Vulgate, and not once did it equate a fallen angel or a satan. Jesus was called this twice, within the Bible, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia. Venus, or the Morning Star, only comes into view just before sunrise, and disappears with the sun. Those who rose quickly in fame and renown, and died an early death, were called this. Thus, the King of Babylon (see Isaiah 14:4), was called this at Isaiah 14:12, and so was Jesus Christ at Revelation 22:16. The newer Catholic bibles, which are supposedly translations of the Latin Vulgate, replace the word devil with demon, even though the old original Latin bibles, printed in Germany, have devil, and it is said, it is diabolous the original Latin scrolls. If you change these three words with their proper definitions, you will find that the New Testament is actually speaking about something totally different than what you first thought.
    2
  4420. 2
  4421. 2
  4422. 2
  4423. 2
  4424. 2
  4425. Hernan Visani My guess is, that they may try to lay it on Guccifer 2.0 (Marcel Lazăr Lehel), from Romania, and claim him to be a Russian spy, or some other nonsense. They caught him, and extradited him to the US, where he plead guilty, and claimed that he had hacked Hillary, and stated that it was very easy to gain access. However, the court could find no proof to his claim! They sentenced him to fifty-two months in prison, but Romania wants him back, to serve four years there, first, because he hacked their government officials, and was convicted. The US is to send him back, serve his four there, then be sent back here, to do his fifty-two months. "Lazar said he chose to use "proxy servers in Russia," describing them as the best, providing anonymity." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/04/romanian-hacker-guccifer-breached-clinton-server-it-was-easy.html Wikipedia on Guccifer: "The hacker's IP address was traced to Russia, however there was no certainty as to whether this was his actual location or whether he had used a proxy to hide his true location." On Hillary: "Lehel provided no proof of his claim, and U.S. investigators found no evidence to support the claim. U.S. officials have also said that if Lehel had obtained information from Clinton's servers, he would have publicly released such information, as he did when he obtained access to other high-profile individuals, such as Sidney Blumenthal and George W. Bush." "In a statement of facts filed with his plea agreement, [Lehel] admitted that from at least October 2012 to January 2014, he intentionally gained unauthorized access to personal email and social media accounts belonging to approximately 100 Americans, and he did so to unlawfully obtain his victims' personal information and email correspondence. His victims included an immediate family member of two former U.S. presidents, a former member of the U.S. Cabinet, a former member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and a former presidential advisor, he admitted. [Lehel] admitted that in many instances, he publically [sic] released his victims’ private email correspondence, medical and financial information and personal photographs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer#Claim_regarding_Hillary_Clinton_email_server If they try to lay this on Guccifer, that will be odd, when the court claims that he nor they could provide no evidence that he hacked Hillary. Since her server was unsecured, I'd say he may have done it, but where is the proof? Also, you'll note that he used Russian proxies, just as any other Hacker could have done. A US hacker can use a Russian proxy, and their trace will end up in Russia, and vice versa. The US has proxy servers too. Of course, Guccifer had his own website where he posted his stuff, etc. Then there was DC Leaks, who released stuff, along with Wikileaks, so they don't know who did what.
    2
  4426. 2
  4427. 2
  4428. 2
  4429. 2
  4430. 2
  4431. 2
  4432. 2
  4433. 2
  4434. 2
  4435. 2
  4436. 2
  4437. 2
  4438. 2
  4439. 2
  4440. 2
  4441. 2
  4442. 2
  4443. 2
  4444. 2
  4445. 2
  4446. 2
  4447. 2
  4448. 2
  4449. 2
  4450. 2
  4451. 2
  4452. Ezilla 45 When you mentioned Snopes, that reminds me of the lie that they told, about an eight point strategy of the Marxist leftists, or the New Left. Someone did get it off, and claimed that Saul Alinsky wrote it, but in actuality, it was a student of Alinsky's, named Professor Frances Fox Piven who did, along with another Marxist professor, named Richard Cloward, at Columbia University. Alinsky published the plan or strategy in his Marxist activist groups literature, along with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and Snopes conveniently left that truth out, claiming that it was all false. The plan was called the Cloward–Piven strategy, which was about toppling western governments; mainly the US. Saul Alinsky”s inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state. (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112357_1066302156715778_4293103776881640390_n-560x391.jpeg "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"." Saul Alinsky was the Marxist bastard, who Hillary idolized, and wrote her senior thesis about. The Clintons and Obama are friends with, and were taught by, that lot. Yes, the cat lady that runs Snopes, is a leftist liar.
    2
  4453. 2
  4454. 2
  4455. 2
  4456. 2
  4457. 2
  4458. 2
  4459. 2
  4460. 2
  4461. 2
  4462. 2
  4463. 2
  4464. 2
  4465. 2
  4466. 2
  4467. 2
  4468. 2
  4469. 2
  4470. 2
  4471. 2
  4472. 2
  4473. 2
  4474. ***** Some don't know the difference between a college fraternity, and a multi-national mens fraternity, which sprouted from the oldest labor union in the world. It is funny how Skull & Bones keeps coming up, even though Yale has many others, and some are said to be just as weird as the Bonesmen. There's the Scroll and Key, Wolfe's Head, Book and Snake, and many others who have obtained government jobs after uni. The conspiracy theorists think that the Skull & Bones are part of Freemasonry over their Jolly Roger and the number under it. The only tie, that I know of, was the way the Templars buried their dead. I wonder why Marrs and Icke keep leaving these others out? Yale Societies from Wikipedia: Skull and Bones, the oldest and most famous. Scroll and Key, second oldest and wealthiest, occupies Moorish Beaux-Arts building. Wolf's Head, third-oldest; largest compound on campus. Book and Snake, occupies a replica Greek temple. Berzelius, founded as the Colony Club in 1848 at the Sheffield Scientific School; tapped first African-American captain of an Ivy League football team. St. Elmo's founded as Delta Phi Omicron in 1889. Elihu began in 1903. It occupies a federal-era house on the perimeter of the New Haven Green. Elihu was the first non-secret "senior society. Aurelian Honor Society, founded 1910, first society to tap women. Oldest existing Honor Society at Yale. Torch Honor Society, founded 1916. Second oldest existing Honor Society at Yale. Manuscript Society occupies a modern building and garden by noted architects. Mace and Chain youngest tomb society. Founded in 1956, it occupies a 180-year-old house near campus. Calliopean Society, founded in 1919 as a literary and debating society, became a Senior Honor Society in the mid-20th century. Red Mask, the oldest all-female society at Yale. Linonian Society. Members include undergraduates and graduate students from Yale Law School, Yale Graduate School and Yale School of Management. Originally founded in 1753, it was reconstituted after merging with the Yale Political Union in 1934, and stores its literary collection in Yale's Sterling Memorial Library. Cup and Crown. St. Anthony Hall, founded 1867, only remaining three-year society. Although outsiders may enter the building and attend social events, part of the building is closed and retains the earmarks of a Yale secret society. The current (its third) building, when donated by a Vanderbilt in 1913, described by The New York Times as "the most expensive and elaborate secret society building in the United States.
    2
  4475. 2
  4476. 2
  4477. 2
  4478. 2
  4479. 2
  4480. 2
  4481. 2
  4482. 2
  4483. 2
  4484. 2
  4485. 2
  4486. 2
  4487. 2
  4488. 2
  4489. 2
  4490. 2
  4491. 2
  4492. 2
  4493. 2
  4494. 2
  4495. 2
  4496. bceaser1: There seems to be a group of people, who think that others should be responsible for their well being, and that others should pay for it. When they don't get their way, they then lie about it, as the left is doing now. Before Obama, we paid for private insurance, and the rates were flexible. We also had a choice about the plan and the company. The elderly, and the disabled, has Social Security and Medicare, which pays well. I'm on it, as I am retired. The poor had Medicaid, the Health Department, and the Hospitals, which are a part of Hill-Burton, and they had to take them in and treat them. The Hill-Burton plan paid the cost. The Veterans have the VA, and if they can afford it, public physicians and hospitals. That leaves those who were above the poverty level, who could afford basic hospitalization, or they should have been able to. If one worked, many had employer paid health insurance. It was found that a good amount of the people, who were placed on Medicaid after Obamacare, were already qualified for it, but had never applied for it. 84%, as of January 2017, were on Medicaid. This tells me that there is a minority, who wants others to fund their insurance, because they don't want to work to pay for the total cost of it, or pay at all. I think that the ones who are complaining, are the same minority who receive it for free, or at little cost, because they raised the minimum income level for those who had to pay. (Young adults working in the service industry, etc). Of course, when you have teachers telling students that capitalism is bad, and that they should take (steal) from the bourgeoisie and rich, this is the entitled crowd we get. They have created a bunch of Bernie Sanders cloned brats. Why should you or I pay for someone else, who we do not know, or have no familiar ties with, let alone, someone other than our immediate family? One would think that these people have no idea about what personal responsibility is.
    2
  4497. Jamez Jarrett: So, you're jealous of old money then? Jealous of those who did well, and left their money to their children, so they wouldn't have to toil like they did? Yes, it is a deep philosophical question. Why should I pay for you, whom I do not know, and am not related to? If you dropped dead tomorrow, because you failed to take care of yourself, (personal responsibility), I wouldn't know, nor would I particularly care. My family comes first. The very words you just spouted, were the same words from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Mark spouted them, because daddy dearest, a wealthy attorney, cut him off. Engels was wealthy. They both planned to start a political party, and make everyone poor, except those running the government, which would have been them and their cronies at the helm, under the Communist League political party. Their party members, all anarchists, acted the very way that ANTIFA are now. The regressives, wanting to take people back to pre-1600, and put everyone under feudalism. After all, that is what Marxism is, rebranded serfdom. The USSR and Mao's China are two very good examples, along with Venezuela now. The first two murdered more innocent people than the Nazis did during WWII. Also, it might pay you to know, that the old money is almost gone. It was many years back, as the British aristocracy, who lost everything, were marrying people from the US, who had new money, the nouveau riche. That was people back in the 1920s, and 1930s, who had made it big in the oil industry, etc. Most everyone in the US, are nouveau riche, especially today's Silicon Valley lot. Funnily enough, they're mostly leftists, who borrowed from banks (capitalism), to get there.
    2
  4498. 2
  4499. 2
  4500. 2
  4501. 2
  4502. 2
  4503. 2
  4504. 2
  4505. 2
  4506. 2
  4507. 2
  4508. 2
  4509. 2
  4510. 2
  4511. 2
  4512. 2
  4513. 2
  4514. 2
  4515. 2
  4516. 2
  4517. 2
  4518. From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/ Cloward-Piven Strategy: Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state: 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. Look into this: Communist Party USA Democratic Socialists of America SDS Students for a Democratic Society Weather Underground (Weathermen) William Charles "Bill" Ayers (Weathermen) Bernardine Dohrn (Weathermen) Kathy Boudin (Weathermen) David Gilbert (Weathermen) Larry Grathwohl (Weathermen) Michael Klonsky (Weathermen) Chicago's school reform movement. Ayers stated that it was to teach revolutionary communism. ACORN
    2
  4519. 2
  4520. 2
  4521. 2
  4522. 2
  4523. 2
  4524. 2
  4525. 2
  4526. 2
  4527. 2
  4528. 2
  4529. 2
  4530. 2
  4531. 2
  4532. When you read about Hillary in the book, Guilty As Sin, you will find out that she had a strict upbringing, and how that damaged her is unknown, but it states that it did warp her mental faculties. She then goes off the Wesleyan College, where she gets involved with groups such as Students for a Democratic Society, (which is a Marxist-Communist front group), and she makes the Marxist radical, Saul Alinsky her idol. Hillary even wrote her senior dissertation about Alinsky, with his help, and she stayed in contact with the red bastard until he died. While in College, she takes courses on political science, and becomes an attorney, whom are all taught to lie at the drop of a hat. Worse, she has most of the symptoms of someone who is a sociopath, by her own actions. Below, is more about Hillary's idol, Saul Alinsky. The Saul Alinsky inspired Cloward-Piven Strategy: "Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state." (From Alinsky's activist group's printed literature and The Nation magazine, 1966): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. 2015 article by Piven, stating how the strategy has been working: https://www.thenation.com/article/think-the-us-is-the-foremost-global-superpower-think-again/ "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and [Marxist] political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty." "Cloward and Piven were both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work. The strategy was formulated in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty"." From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." We have to continue to convey our anti-extreme right strategy to the broader movement, especially the first time and young voters, so that no matter the nominee, all will join in the general election mobilization. Without question there are serious problems and weaknesses with the Clinton campaign. Clinton carries a lot of historic baggage including her ties to Wall Street, hawkishness on foreign policy, etc. It is so obviously unseemly and tone deaf to accept such large “speaking” fees from Wall Street. But we know this already. http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/
    2
  4533. 2
  4534. 2
  4535. 2
  4536. 2
  4537. 2
  4538. 2
  4539. 2
  4540. 2
  4541. 2
  4542. 2
  4543. 2
  4544. 2
  4545. 2
  4546. 2
  4547. 2
  4548. 2
  4549. 2
  4550. Funny, how they did this, when twelve years later, congress had a hearing about the Warren Commission report, and found that, indeed, there was a conspiracy to kill JFK, but they didn't know who was behind it. Russian defectors stated that the USSR was behind it, and that they were directing people high up in the US government. Since the Democratic Party was, and still is, infested with card-carrying communists and fellow travelers, it's not hard to reach a conclusion about which political party was behind it. JFK was too close to the right for the Democrats taste, at that time. Some tried to lay it on LBJ, but it wasn't he. That was a smoke screen laid by the people behind it, according to the Soviet defectors. LBJ carried on Eisenhower's policy, just as JFK did. However, LBJ allowed the far left their way with his welfare programs. In fact, LBJ upped the conflict, in Vietnam, from a police action to a war. The USSR was fighting that tooth and nail, by using agitprops within the US, to incite protests and riots, by claiming that the US was losing the war. The Democrats controlled congress, and pulled the funding for Vietnam, which ended it under Nixon. After the US left, somewhere around a couple of million Vietnamese were murdered by the communists. Right now, ANTIFA, BLM, the Black Panthers, BAMN, CAIR, and La Raza, etc, are all backed and ran by the Communist Party USA. Malcolm X tried to warn the black population about this, who had once been Republicans. They left the GOP over Johnson's welfare package, and now they're being led by communists and Islamic terrorists. Malcolm X was murdered over revealing that. First and foremost, communists are thieves. Secondly, they're violent. Once they take over, they murder millions. The US has been torn apart by the communists, because many are stupid enough to believe the communist propaganda fed to them by the media and our schools. There is a huge FBI report about this, written during Eisenhower's time. The report spoke of how the press had become the enemy, along with the communists methods. I just read an article, on a Berkeley blog, written by a Texas Tech professor, about how they're using the methodology of the communist, Antonio Gramsci, to overthrow capitalism and neo-liberalism, via our education system. Gramsci's idea was to destroy western culture, in order to bring down capitalism, and install socialism. They are against both Hillary and Trump, so that leaves Bernie Sanders, who they support, though they don't mention him by name. There was a reason that the Democrats canned Sanders like they did. Sanders is a known fellow traveler, who met the same fate as did Henry Wallace. http://www.berkeleyreviewofeducation.com/cfc2016-blog/the-role-of-organic-intellectuals-in-the-era-of-a-trump-presidency
    2
  4551. 2
  4552. 2
  4553. 2
  4554. 2
  4555. 2
  4556. 2
  4557. 2
  4558. 2
  4559. 2
  4560. 2
  4561. 2
  4562. 2
  4563. 2
  4564. 2
  4565. 2
  4566. 2
  4567. 2
  4568. 2
  4569. 2
  4570. 2
  4571. 2
  4572. 2
  4573. Nobody distrusted the UN that much until 1992, and that was over the Earth Summit held at Rio, leading to the Rio+20, which is what led us to their two agendas, today, where 100+ nations signed up for them. GHW Bush, a neoconservative, led the charge for that, but most of it had been preplanned between the Nixon and Bush administrations. Coincidentally, during Nixon was when, what became, the G7 was created at the White House, which was Bush's NWO that he spoke about, and they were the leaders of the new world economic order, (new international economic order), and later, the Washington Consensus, which is collapsing. Russia was allowed into the G7 for a while, when it was known as the G7+1. The G7 was put together over oil and gas, as well as dealing with OPEC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Seven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Consensus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_international_order https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1975-10-01/new-world-economic-order "Virtually no part of the New International Economic Order was implemented. Instead, from the 1980s onward, the Bretton Woods framework would be replaced with the Washington Consensus and economic globalization on terms often described as neoliberal." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_International_Economic_Order Also, according to the UN: "The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals put forward during the 1970s by some developing countries through the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development to promote their interests by improving their terms of trade, increasing development assistance, developed-country tariff reductions, and other means. It was meant to be a revision of the international economic system in favour of Third World countries, replacing the Bretton Woods system, which had benefited the leading states that had created it – especially the United States." The UN was used as a bully pulpit by the G7, to push for war in the name of fighting communism and ter###ism, and installing democracies, which was still the Eisenhower policy. At the time, the policy was supposedly about removing Russia and China's influence under a policy of "containment," which eventually required war to bring it about in the Middle-East (keeping Russia out). However, obtaining natural resources was the G7's major hidden goal, and much of that was due to the oil and gas deposits located in Africa to Vietnam, as well as OPEC's control. It's why the NIEO was ignored. Since large corporations lobby and control politicians, we have what we have, to the point of demanding open borders, the destruction of the nation state, etc. After the Gulf Wars, the preceding "wars" were done by proxy, using things such as color revolutions for plausible deniability to skirt any agreements. Several retired C#A case officers have openly bragged about this, and have written several books on the subject. Now, this neoliberal and neoconservative globalist group, as well as China's influence of the UN, is out in the open where the public has noticed it. I would say that the internet has helped that revelation along. The history, leading to today, going back to 1945: Prof. John J. Mearsheimer, Univ. of Chicago, (2019), "Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order": https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/isec_a_00342 Pompeo at Brussels: Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTr4cO8LXGA Also, read the article titled: The Recurring Intellectual Plague of Globalization, published in the Journal of Political Risk by William R. Hawkins, "a consultant specializing in international economics and national security issues. He is a former economics professor who has served on the staff of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee.": https://www.jpolrisk.com/the-recurring-intellectual-plague-of-globalization/#more-2618 The right hand is never allowed to see what the left is doing, but this time, it did.
    2
  4574. 2
  4575. 2
  4576. 2
  4577. 2
  4578. 2
  4579. 2
  4580. 2
  4581. 2
  4582. 2
  4583. 2
  4584. 2
  4585. 2
  4586. 2
  4587. 2
  4588. 2
  4589. 2
  4590. 2
  4591. 2
  4592. 2
  4593. 2
  4594. 2
  4595. 2
  4596. 2
  4597. 2
  4598. 2
  4599. 2
  4600. 2
  4601. 2
  4602. 2
  4603. 2
  4604. 2
  4605. 2
  4606. 2
  4607. 2
  4608. 2
  4609. 2
  4610. 2
  4611. 2
  4612. 2
  4613. 2
  4614. 2
  4615. 2
  4616. 2
  4617. 2
  4618. 2
  4619. 2
  4620. 2
  4621. 2
  4622. 2
  4623. 2
  4624. 2
  4625. 2
  4626. 2
  4627. 2
  4628. 2
  4629. 2
  4630. 2
  4631. 2
  4632. 2
  4633. 2
  4634. 2
  4635. 2
  4636. 2
  4637. 2
  4638. 2
  4639. 2
  4640. 2
  4641. It started with the ##### rates in NYC, when Giuliani took office as mayor (1994–2001). He invented the methods to use, and ##### plummeted. Those methods were quickly adopted in London and other large cities. However, it didn't take long for left-wing politicos and attorneys to cry foul. After Giuliani, Bloomberg came in, who still used it, but lied about it after changing political parties. ##### started to soar after de Blasio came in, and it's now rampant. It's not so much about race, but the area or police precinct that is selected for stop-and-frisk. These are areas of high ##### rates, or places where suspected #####s will occur. From FactCheck dot org: "Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg misleadingly stated that he “cut” the police practice of stop-and-frisk — a policy that he “inherited” — by “95%” by the time he left office as mayor of New York. There were nearly twice as many stops in his last year as mayor compared with the year before he took office. "It’s true that the number of recorded stops declined steadily over the last two years of Bloomberg’s 12 years in office. But Bloomberg’s statistic ignores the dramatic rise in such stops in earlier years under his watch. He also fails to mention that the decline in later years came amid public backlash about the policy and mounting pressure from a class-action lawsuit." Activist attorneys are behind the increase in ####, as well as left-wing politics. "Paul J. Browne, an NYPD spokesman, defended the practice, saying 'stops save lives, especially in communities disproportionately affected by #####, and especially among young men of color who last year represented 90 percent of murder victims and 96 percent of shooting victims in New York City.'" Sorry, if I use that five-letter word, starting with "c," they delete my comments very quickly. I do wonder why?
    2
  4642. 2
  4643. 2
  4644. 2
  4645. Joshua Halpern: Sadly, some, as the commenter above, only see this from a religious standpoint, but never the political, nor do they understand the corruption of past governments, and why the Jews have always been attacked. Almost in every incidence, the few Jews that were the goldsmiths and the first banks, were those that corrupt monarchs over-borrowed from and preyed upon. The monarch's lavish spending, and wars, led to them not being able to pay back what was due, and the Jews were accused of many things, so that these corrupt monarchs could purge the very people they were in debt to, if not murder them. Those monarchs stole the money. The entire time the Roman church preached against usury, they were secretly borrowing from the Jews, which they forced to live in the ghettos. Philip the Fair was one such monarch. He was up to his neck in debt to the Lombardy Bankers, the Goldsmiths, and the Templars. When he couldn't pay it back, he started the purges, blackmailing the pope, and started with the Lombardy bankers, then the Jewish Goldsmiths, and finally, the royal bankers, the Templars. We see how that worked out, and this has happened several times in history. They still blame the Jews for what corrupt governments, monarchs, and politicians did. Many forget that it was the British government that promised Palestine to the Jews, if they won the war. Turkey carries just as much blame. Instead of blaming the governments behind it, they blame the Jews. I can't blame the Jews for wanting a home to move to, when they have been vilified by those who don't know the truth, as well as the corrupt governments behind the lies.
    2
  4646. 2
  4647. 2
  4648. 2
  4649. 2
  4650. 2
  4651. 2
  4652. 2
  4653. 2
  4654. 2
  4655. 2
  4656. 2
  4657. 2
  4658. 2
  4659. 2
  4660. 2
  4661. 2
  4662. 2
  4663. 2
  4664. 2
  4665. 2
  4666. 2
  4667. 2
  4668. 2
  4669. 2
  4670. 2
  4671. 2
  4672. 2
  4673. 2
  4674. 2
  4675. 2
  4676. 2
  4677. 2
  4678. 2
  4679. 2
  4680. 2
  4681. 2
  4682. 2
  4683. 2
  4684. 2
  4685. 2
  4686. 2
  4687. 2
  4688. 2
  4689. 2
  4690. 2
  4691. 2
  4692. 2
  4693. 2
  4694. 2
  4695. 2
  4696. 2
  4697. 2
  4698. 2
  4699. 2
  4700. 2
  4701. 2
  4702. 2
  4703. 2
  4704. 2
  4705. 2
  4706. 2
  4707. 2
  4708. 2
  4709. 2
  4710. 2
  4711. 2
  4712. 2
  4713. 2
  4714. 2
  4715. 2
  4716. 2
  4717. 2
  4718. 2
  4719. 2
  4720. 2
  4721. 2
  4722. 2
  4723. 2
  4724. 2
  4725. 2
  4726. 2
  4727. 2
  4728. 2
  4729. 2
  4730. 2
  4731. 2
  4732. 2
  4733. 2
  4734. 2
  4735. 2
  4736. 2
  4737. 2
  4738. 2
  4739. 2
  4740. 2
  4741. 2
  4742. 2
  4743.  @UncleMort  They did the same thing to the US under Nixon. David Rockefeller praised Mao, and he, along with Henry Kissinger, went to China to set up their entire industrial transfer deal. To move the industry there, you had to go through Kissinger Associates. The CFR took over the US State Dept by the start of WWII. I would say that Chatham House (RIIA) has been determining Britains outcome at the Foreign Office for a little longer than that. The CFR and RIIA are the same beast, invented by Rhodes' round table group in Paris, on May 19, 1919, consisting of the wealthy power elite (aka Cliveden Set). You have the same un-elected round table group running the EU today. This is the same lot that sent Lenin and Trotsky to Petrograd, and helped Mao at the end of WWII. It was to force them into the industrial revolution and capitalism. The EU is the continuance of the Nazi's Neuordnung Europas, which the same power elite helped to plan before WWII. Carroll Quigley, Ph.D., interview with the Washington Post: "I learned the Round Table Group was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975) A North American Union, a European Union, and an Asian Union. "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens … In 1983/4, I warned of a take-over of world governments being orchestrated by these people. There was an obvious plan to subvert true democracies and selected leaders were not being chosen based upon character but upon their loyalty to an economic system run by the elites and dedicated to preserving their power. All we have now are pseudo-democracies." - Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D. a former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner in an FTW interview "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas."__George Brock Chisholm, former Director of the U.N. World Health Organization, Psychiatry (1946) also as quoted by Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM) Famous Quotes About Rights and Liberty, Form #08.001 (2014).
    2
  4744. 2
  4745. 2
  4746. 2
  4747. 2
  4748. 2
  4749. 2
  4750. 2
  4751. 2
  4752. 2
  4753. 2
  4754. 2
  4755. 2
  4756. 2
  4757. 2
  4758. 2
  4759. 2
  4760. 2
  4761. 2
  4762. 2
  4763. 2
  4764. 2
  4765. 2
  4766. 2
  4767. 2
  4768. 2
  4769. 2
  4770. 2
  4771. 2
  4772. 2
  4773. 2
  4774. 2
  4775. 2
  4776. 2
  4777. 2
  4778. 2
  4779. 2
  4780. 2
  4781. 2
  4782. 2
  4783. 2
  4784. 2
  4785. 2
  4786. 2
  4787. 2
  4788. 2
  4789. 2
  4790. 2
  4791. 2
  4792. 2
  4793. 2
  4794. 2
  4795. 2
  4796. 2
  4797. 2
  4798. 2
  4799. 2
  4800. 2
  4801. 2
  4802. 2
  4803. 2
  4804. 2
  4805. 2
  4806. 2
  4807. 2
  4808. 2
  4809. 2
  4810. 2
  4811. 2
  4812. 2
  4813. 2
  4814. 2
  4815. 2
  4816. 2
  4817. 2
  4818. 2
  4819. 2
  4820. 2
  4821. 2
  4822. 2
  4823. 2
  4824. 2
  4825. 2
  4826. 2
  4827. 2
  4828. 2
  4829. 2
  4830. 2
  4831. 2
  4832. 2
  4833. 2
  4834. 2
  4835. 2
  4836. 2
  4837. 2
  4838. 2
  4839. 2
  4840. 2
  4841. 2
  4842. 2
  4843. 2
  4844. 2
  4845. 2
  4846. 2
  4847. 2
  4848. 2
  4849. 2
  4850. 2
  4851. 2
  4852. 2
  4853. 2
  4854. The hatred of regular Freemasonry by Catholics is due to Protestantism. Fraternal Freemasonry is based upon the reformist movement, even though the original Masonic Constitution states it is of the Catholic religion, which was written by a Presbyterian minister. It's due to the Anglican church, which still considered itself Catholic in its rites, except the monarch of the UK is the head and not the pope. Thus, it is considered by Rome to be Protestant. Henry VIII brought that about. The fraternity was formed in 1717 by four London Lodges that were out of work, and they now had several elderly masons needing financial help. They formed what later became the United Grand Lodge of England, the Mother, and Premiere Lodge, and the fraternity was set up as a pension and as a charity to help poor and distressed Masons, their widows, and orphans. Operative Masons work from the Guild Hall in the City. The fraternity is not connected to the guild. The Grand Lodge is also built outside the wall. The basis, or work, of the fraternity, is to "make good men better." It teaches that man is a temple for which God dwells within, via his soul, and that he should always be a just and upright person. The symbology and allegory lead one to the Pilgrims Path, and by studying the symbology, you will find the truth about all religions. That is why Freemasonry has groups that study comparative religion. Most do not make this long journey. If you journey close to the end, as I did, you will never see religion, nor the three estates, in the same light again. You will know the truth. This is what the Catholics, Jews, Muslims, and many other religions wish to keep hidden. As far as the Scottish Rite, it is an appendant Rite, and it is a separate organization or legal corporation, just as is the York Rite. To join them, though, one must be a Master Mason. You are not required to join either. Both rites are nothing but extra lessons, or degrees, which reveal more by allegory and symbology. Starting with the 15th, which is the start of the Knights, it is most definitely Christian oriented. At the top, which are the 32nd and 33rd degrees in regular Freemasonry, the secret is that all men are both good and bad, are of a dual nature, and that there must be a balance, just as in nature. In either direction, from the middle, chaos lies due to zealotry and radical ideology. The Pilgrim takes the center path where the scales are balanced.
    2
  4855. 2
  4856. 2
  4857. 2
  4858. 2
  4859. 2
  4860. 2
  4861. 2
  4862. 2
  4863. 2
  4864. 2
  4865. 2
  4866. 2
  4867. 2
  4868. 2
  4869. 2
  4870. 2
  4871. 2
  4872. 2
  4873. 2
  4874. CB BC: China is the product of the globalist movement that started in 1992, during a UN conference at Rio. China had backing at the UN, then, via the globalists. Rio+20, the UN, and their "sustainable development." 1991, also, began the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Hong Kong was still controlled by the British, then, but it was relinquished in 1997 to China. Hong Kong became the banking hub and tie for China to the west. China was selected and supported by the globalists going back to when Henry Kissinger and the Rockefellers made their trips to China in search of cheap labor. They took this to the CFR, RIIA, and UN. Britain was involved over Hong Kong. The collapse of the Soviet Union put this into overdrive. "The WTO officially commenced on 1 January 1995 under the Marrakesh Agreement, signed by 123 nations on 15 April 1994, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which commenced in 1948." Under GHW Bush, the west began replacing the old economic order under Bretton Woods (GATT) with the new globalist order (liberal international order, or Bush's New World Order, and finally, the G-20). 1992 was the year, at Rio, and there was a push to democratize seven nations, forming "civil societies," and that led to the 1994 agreement, and the creation of the G-20 in 1999 for the new millennium. Kuwait was just "freed" by Bush in 1991, too. That created the Middle-East excuse. "In 1990, Kuwait was invaded, and later annexed, by Saddam's Iraq. The Iraqi occupation of Kuwait came to an end in 1991 after military intervention by a military coalition led by the United States. Kuwait is a non-NATO ally of the United States. Kuwait is also a major ally of ASEAN, while maintaining a very strong relationship with China." Next year, 1992 at Rio. "Hong Kong has been a [WTO] member since 1995 (as "Hong Kong, China" since 1997) predating the People's Republic of China, which joined in 2001 after 15 years of negotiations." A year before the next UN meeting in 2002. 1992 was the first Rio meeting. 2002, one year after China signed on with the WTO, was the second meeting. 2012 was the third meeting for the Rio+20. 2012 was when the antics started under Obama (repeal of Smith-Mundt Act). President Trump is the only one to question China still being a WTO member, and has mentioned booting them out. Trump doesn't get on well with the G-20 either. "The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD), also known as Rio 2012, Rio+20, or Earth Summit 2012, was the third international conference on sustainable development aimed at reconciling the economic and environmental goals of the global community. Hosted by Brazil in Rio de Janeiro from 13 to 22 June 2012, Rio+20 was a 20-year follow-up to the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in the same city, and the 10th anniversary of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg." 2021-22, are very important to the globalist agenda. This is why they tried to destroy Trump's campaign, and remove him from office. Trump destroyed the TPP agreement, as he promised during his campaign. TPP would have brought it all together. He then created a new agreement for North America. China's OBOR and Europe was left hanging.
    2
  4875. 2
  4876. 2
  4877. 2
  4878. 2
  4879. 2
  4880. 2
  4881. 2
  4882. 2
  4883. 2
  4884. 2
  4885. 2
  4886. 2
  4887. 2
  4888. 2
  4889. 2
  4890. 2
  4891. 2
  4892. 2
  4893. 2
  4894. 2
  4895. 2
  4896. Lambert Lum: Evidently, you can't see the trees for the forest. It is about global power, and who controls the oil and gas. Once Europe and Britain are dependent upon suppliers controlled by Russia, then Russia can dictate to them, via the nations he controls, with threats of cutting them off, or raising prices. That is why Russia just refinanced Venezuela's debt, so Russia can control them, and their oil. It's well known that Putin is trying to go after the energy resources everywhere. It's about two globalist powers, The NATO group against Russia, which used to control the Warsaw Pact. It's about money, dominion, and power. It has been since WWII. It is also about the US dollar, which OPEC agreed to use to purchase oil. Russia and China have been trying to stop that. The US dollar is backed by oil. It's not about US wanting oil, it's about the UK and Europe, on top of the US dollar. The NATO nations use the US to fight their battles, and the US agreed to do it under NATO. That is why the regime changes have occurred in the Middle-East, to put in place rulers favorable to the US and its allies. It was what the Shah of Iran was all about. Anyone that served in the Gulf War can verify what is going on. RFK Jr, happens to know these people, he's a politician, just like his entire family. They're in the ultra-rich clique, with the banks and energy cartel. His uncle was John F. Kennedy. He knows what he's talking about, though he put a left-wing spin upon it all. It was Haliburton, who was going to build the pipeline, to supply Europe with natural gas, and later, oil. The Saudis, and Iraqis would profit from it, just as would Qatar, who would supply the gas, and they're the NATO allies. RFK Jr. is not "this guy."
    2
  4897. 2
  4898. 2
  4899. 2
  4900. 2
  4901. 2
  4902. 2
  4903. 2
  4904. 2
  4905. The China, Russia, Iran, and NK cabal, and the string of pearls. What one must ask is, who and what corporations within the US are in China's pocket? Go back to Rio in 1992 and 2012, as well as at Johannesburg in 2002. Rio 20. It was well known, at that time, about China financing the Clinton - Gore campaign, and GHW Bush got on the sustainable development bandwagon too. 2021 was the year that the public was supposed to become unsustainable. Something to think about. The POTUS: "For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interests, they partner with these people that don't have your good in mind. Our campaign represents a true existential threat, like they haven't seen before. This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government. The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry. The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, China, and other countries all around the world..." "We've seen this firsthand in the WikiLeaks documents in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends, and her donors.”__President Trump, October, 2016. Who controls the MSM via six corporations? Are they all within China too? Why do certain newspapers print entire pages of Chinese propaganda?
    2
  4906. 2
  4907. 2
  4908. 2
  4909. 2
  4910. 2
  4911. 2
  4912. 2
  4913. 2
  4914. 2
  4915. 2
  4916. 2
  4917. 2
  4918. 2
  4919. 2
  4920. 2
  4921. Did you ever wonder if the activists are as numerous as they are claimed to be by the media and some in gov? Is their movement as really as large as it's made out to be, by some, or is it really only a small percentage of society that's magnified by using propaganda? No, America is far from gone, believe me, as many of us have noticed that the claims of a giant uprising isn't true, and it's only to be found in small pockets. At that, many activists travel in from elsewhere to cause their chaos in the states it's not found in. Now, we've begun asking why that is. I would about bet that you will find a similar thing in Britain. One can consider the Anglo tribes, the Americans and the British, as two political tribes that are, or were, close to the same that are built upon liberalism, individualism, and capitalism, which are competing against several other tribes of different beliefs around the globe. What the activists seem to hate are the values of these two nations. Ask yourself why. Green-eyed... TIK has some of the better historical videos about the history of socialism and communism, and they explain much, especially why many left-wing activists are anti-Semitic, since they see the Jews as the fathers of capitalism, liberalism, and individuality, though that's not really true. That hatred was in both Marx and Engels' own words, as well as in the Soviets, and the NSDAP, too. Now, after WWII, think about the differing socialist tribes agreeing to mix their old ideologies together, and trying to bring about a new form of it. The socialists knew, after a while, that the only way to do so was by revolution and lies, because, even then, they didn't have the people to pull it off in much of the west.
    2
  4922. 2
  4923. 2
  4924. 2
  4925. 2
  4926. 2
  4927. 2
  4928. 2
  4929. 2
  4930. 2
  4931. 2
  4932. 2
  4933. 2
  4934. 2
  4935. 2
  4936. 2
  4937. 2
  4938. 2
  4939. 2
  4940. 2
  4941. 2
  4942. 2
  4943. 2
  4944. 2
  4945. 2
  4946. 2
  4947. 2
  4948. 2
  4949. 2
  4950. 2
  4951. 2
  4952. 2
  4953. 2
  4954. 2
  4955. 2
  4956. 2
  4957. All of today's religions have a single root, and it was at the Pontic Steppe. It was there with the start of language, the tribe, and civilization, and it is tied to the cattle herders of the mountains, as the ruling elite, and the wheat farmers of the plains. That early language, religion, and civilization spread both east and west, and then, south. It's origins, it is thought, lie with the peoples on either side of the Volga, just south of where it forks at the southern end of the Urals (around Samara). The farmers lived to the west of the river, and the cattle herders to the east, closer to the mountains. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samara The mountain dwellers, who once lived in carved caves from Anatolia to the Caucasus and Urals, came out onto the plains, and began herding and farming. Language starts here, as well as religion, based upon the tribe. The farther away from the point of origin, culture caused changes in that religion, and brought differing beliefs. That leads us to today. The mountain has had deep connections to religion, as rites were performed on top of them, as well as on top of the burial mounds. This leads to the tale of Polyphemus, and this religion was also behind the pyramids built on the plains. This ancient religion was with the first four civilizations, which were the people on both sides of the Caucasus, which leads to the Fertile Crescent, the Indus River valley, China, and Peru. Even though some scholars may deny it, it was the same religion in all four areas. Peru's civilization didn't rise on its own.
    2
  4958. 2
  4959. 2
  4960. 2
  4961. Like Simon, I remember it from the eighties as well. I believe it was introduced in the US by those like Farrakhan, and a few other charlatans. Of course, it had roots in the Middle-East, and the Soviets were behind generating most of it via their puppet state dictators. It was to turn their community against ours, by claiming that the white man culturally appropriated their history. When Brigham Young University made a find in an Egyptian cemetery, which disproved this nonsense, a certain Egyptian antiquities director, it was said, forced them to leave. They had found the graves of some of the upper class of that time, and they had red and auburn hair, which was much the same as those from the north. They were cousins. It fits in with the Kurgan hypothesis, tracing language back to the Yamnaya, the mound builders. The ziggurats and pyramids are more modern recreations of those mounds. It requires a migration of people for that to occur, and DNA supports what happened. Those that came from the Eurasian Grass-Steppe, came down into Anatolia, and migrated as far south as the lands along the Nile. With them also came their knowledge. They had also spread down into Mesopotamia, and Persia, as well as part of India, and over into the Mongol territory of China. They domesticated the Aurochs, creating today's cattle, and the horse. They also invented the wheel, and the chariot, making them the fiercest of warriors. The Middle-East was where they mixed, creating the dark-haired people spoken of by the ancient Mesopotamians.
    2
  4962. 2
  4963. 2
  4964. 2
  4965. 2
  4966. 2
  4967. Vican: The US needed the UN, when we started it in 1945, to try to control the radical countries in Europe and elsewhere, by using sanctions in place of war. It bound all participating countries under an international law. The problem, was that the UN was never much good at doing anything, except costing the participating controlling countries a lot of money, as we still had war, where Europe dragged the US into them by agreement. We should have dropped the UN twenty years later, when Vietnam came about, due to France. Lyndon Johnson, a socialist, loved the UN, and he escalated Vietnam into a full war. The countries in Western Europe, asked the US to go into West Asia for the gas and oil, and of course, there were US oil interest there too. That is why we're in Syria, now, because Assad denied Europe a pipe line running from Qatar to Turkey. The US had became Europe and the UK's big bully on the block, and the US citizens don't care much for doing it any more. Europe, since WWII, had started using the US as it's army in the Middle-East. Starting in Iran, they toppled an elected leader, who was in bed with Russia, via the CIA, and replaced him with the Shah. That deal was cooked up by the UK with the US. The same countries were behind pitting Iraq against Iran, and asking the US for help in Kuwait. Next, we had Afghanistan, then Iraq, Libya, and finally Syria. It's about oil and natural gas. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Pakistan are involved with the Europeans too. It was all about who controlled that land; those friendly to Europe and the US, or Russia. Russia pulls the strings in Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. They used to in Iraq, and probably still do with many in Afghanistan. Russia has been trying to control the governments in the Middle-East, and thus, the natural resources, since WWII, and Europe, along with the UK, don't have the oil and gas they need.
    2
  4968. 2
  4969. 2
  4970. 2
  4971. 2
  4972. 2
  4973. 2
  4974. 2
  4975. 2
  4976. 2
  4977. 2
  4978. 2
  4979. 2
  4980. 2
  4981. 2
  4982. 2
  4983. 2
  4984. 2
  4985. 2
  4986. 2
  4987. 2
  4988. 2
  4989. 2
  4990. 2
  4991. 2
  4992. 2
  4993. 2
  4994. 2
  4995. 2
  4996. 2
  4997. 2
  4998. 2
  4999. 2
  5000. 2
  5001. 2
  5002. 2
  5003. 2
  5004. 2
  5005. 2
  5006. 2
  5007. 2
  5008. 2
  5009. 2
  5010. 2
  5011. 2
  5012. 2
  5013. 2
  5014. 2
  5015. 2
  5016. 2
  5017. 2
  5018. 2
  5019. 2
  5020. 2
  5021. 2
  5022. 2
  5023. Holt is the worst form of capitalist. "Their" type of capitalism is what gave capitalism a bad name, and it's the same group that injected skin color into the definition of race. Sugar plantations are where all of that originated. One might ask Holt about the time his lot joined forces with the "other" socialists and environmentalists. CFR members exposed it, as did Trump in 2000 on the Today Show. The worst dregs of society; international and national socialism making a pact with the tree-huggers. "Trump considered himself a conservative, but criticized Pat Buchanan, saying: 'I'm on the conservative side, but Buchanan is Attila the Hun.' He withdrew from the race citing the party's infighting, as did Jesse Ventura and the Minnesota Reform Party. Donald Trump stated: 'So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.'" "Pat Buchanan decided to leave the Republican Party because: 'The Republican Party at the national level has ceased to be my party. This divorce began around the end of the Cold War when President (George H W) Bush declared it to be a New World-order party and began intervening all over the world. While he and I were allies and friends during the Cold War, I just felt that once the Cold War was over the United States should return to a more traditional non-intervention foreign policy.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America The Soros Red-Green-Brown Alliance.
    2
  5024. 2
  5025. 2
  5026. 2
  5027. 2
  5028. 2
  5029. 2
  5030. 2
  5031. 2
  5032. 2
  5033. 2
  5034. 2
  5035. 2
  5036. No, Kacie, the 1st Amendment does not imply it, it never did. The justices implied it, and used Jefferson's letter, and his opinion, later on, for the case, instead of citing Madison's original intent. Jefferson was a deist, who didn't have the same beliefs as the others. It was Jefferson's interpretation, not that of the amendment's author, James Madison. If they had meant a strict wall of separation, then they would have dropped any use of the bible, the congressional prayer, and any mention of the Ten Commandments, after it was passed, which they didn't do. This argument has been ongoing since 1879, with those on the right, especially the religious, decrying what the court ruled. The 1879 ruling was over bigamy and polygamy, where the court claimed that the Mormon's religious rights did not prevail. "The court considered that if polygamy was allowed, someone might eventually argue that human sacrifice was a necessary part of their religion, and "to permit this would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect to permit every citizen to become a law unto himself."" They concluded this, even though the final condensed version of the 1st amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, _or prohibiting the free exercise thereof_." "The Court believed [by using Jefferson] the First Amendment forbade Congress from legislating against opinion, but allowed it to legislate against action." However, not long back, the courts ruled that certain religions could use Peyote in religious ritual, as a religious right, which is also against the law otherwise. Federal law allows it now, but Oregon resisted it. There is also the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which flies in the face of the 1879 judgement. "Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in 1993, which required the application of strict scrutiny. In response to the Supreme Court's 1997 ruling in City of Boerne v. Flores, which declared the RFRA unconstitutional as applied to the states, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) in 2000, which grants special privileges to religious landowners and prisoners." Also, "in 1997, the United States Supreme Court held the RFRA to be unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507. Unlike the RFRA, which required religious accommodation in virtually all spheres of life, RLUIPA only applies to prisoner and land use cases," and, "in response to City of Boerne v. Flores and other related RFR issues, twenty individual states have passed State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts that apply to state governments and local municipalities." After the above, Oregon changed their law on Peyote. Thus, it is still an ongoing battle, as in 2014, "U.S. District Court Judge Clark Waddoups said that the state [Utah] could keep the ban, [on polygamy] but would not be allowed to arrest people who violate it by living together in common-law marriage situations. This week Waddoups followed that decision with a ruling that the state had violated the religious, free speech, and due process rights of the plaintiffs. The state also owes them court fees, said Waddoups." However, in 2016, "a three-judge federal appeals court panel on Monday handed a setback to the burgeoning polyamorous rights movement, reversing a lower court ruling that decriminalized polygamous cohabitation in Utah." Whether the Brown family will take this on to the Supreme Court is unknown. Utah is resisting arresting anyone practicing polygamy, because it will certainly open up a can of worms if they do. It also depends on how the Supreme Court is stacked, as that 1879 ruling may be overturned, though what they would do about human sacrifice and marrying underage, which is what this is really about, I have no idea. In reality, a new amendment needs to be passed, which bans ritual murder or sexual abuse in religion, but leaves the rest alone. I do not see polygamy with those of legal age as sexual abuse, since both parties are willing. Underage sex or marriage and murder, I do. In reality, there is a split on the opinion of the 1879 ruling, between left and right.
    2
  5037. 2
  5038. 2
  5039. 2
  5040. 2
  5041. 2
  5042. 2
  5043. 2
  5044. 2
  5045. 2
  5046. 2
  5047. 2
  5048. 2
  5049. 2
  5050. 2
  5051. 2
  5052. 2
  5053. There is a reason that the nation state exists, as there are too many ethnicities and cultures, which do not mix well. Some people would rather live in one area over an other, with different cultures, and laws, as well as being able to flee a nation when it becomes unbearable, if possible, to another. Having said this, there are some true dandies within the so-called elite class, especially within university and the foundations, that not only want to force the same culture, which they've created, upon everyone, but they are set upon destroying the nation states. They are the internationalists (political) and socialist progressives; both the same beast, really, and in several nations. From the Wiki article on Internationalism (political): "Supporters of internationalism are known as internationalists and generally believe that humans should unite across national, political, cultural, racial, or class boundaries to advance their common interests, or that governments should cooperate because their mutual long-term interests are of greater importance than their short-term disputes. "Internationalism has several interpretations and meanings, but is usually characterized by opposition to nationalism and isolationism; support for international institutions, such as the United Nations; and a cosmopolitan outlook that promotes and respects other cultures and customs." Sovereign states vs. supranational powers balance "In the strict meaning of the word, internationalism is still based on the existence of sovereign state. Its aims are to encourage multilateralism (world leadership not held by any single country) and create some formal and informal interdependence between countries, with some limited supranational powers given to international organisations controlled by those nations via intergovernmental treaties and institutions. "The ideal of many internationalists, among them world citizens, is to go a step further towards democratic globalization by creating a world government. However, this idea is opposed and/or thwarted by other internationalists, who believe any world government body would be inherently too powerful to be trusted, or because they dislike the path taken by supranational entities such as the United Nations or a union of states such as the European Union and fear that a world government inclined towards fascism would emerge from the former. These internationalists are more likely to support a loose world federation in which most power resides with the national governments." End Quote. David Rockefeller bragged about being an internationalist, and stated that he was proud of it in his memoir. Henry Ford was of the same caliber, and thus, today, large foundations and NGOs, such as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the World Federalists, are behind what we are witnessing in the west, and they are heavily influenced by Russia and China. This is truthfully what is behind the curtain, at the World Economic Forum, in Switzerland.
    2
  5054. 2
  5055. 2
  5056. 2
  5057. 2
  5058. 2
  5059. 2
  5060. 2
  5061. 2
  5062. 2
  5063. 2
  5064. 2
  5065. 2
  5066. 2
  5067. 2
  5068. 2
  5069. 2
  5070. 2
  5071. 2
  5072. 2
  5073. 2
  5074. 2
  5075. 2
  5076. 2
  5077. 2
  5078. 2
  5079. 2
  5080. 2
  5081. 2
  5082. 2
  5083. 2
  5084. 2
  5085. 2
  5086. 2
  5087. 2
  5088. 2
  5089. 2
  5090. 2
  5091. 2
  5092. 2
  5093. 2
  5094. 2
  5095. 2
  5096. 2
  5097. 2
  5098. 2
  5099. 2
  5100. 2
  5101. 2
  5102. 2
  5103. 2
  5104. 2
  5105. 2
  5106. 2
  5107. 2
  5108. 2
  5109. 2
  5110. 2
  5111. 2
  5112. 2
  5113. 2
  5114. 2
  5115. 2
  5116. 2
  5117. 2
  5118. 2
  5119. 2
  5120. 2
  5121. 2
  5122. 2
  5123. 2
  5124. 2
  5125. 2
  5126. 2
  5127. 2
  5128. 2
  5129. 2
  5130. 2
  5131. 2
  5132. 2
  5133. 2
  5134. 2
  5135. 2
  5136. The lie of multiculturalism, (everyone is equal), can be found as far back as Karl Marx's rants. Marx loved claiming that everyone was equal, except the rulers of a nation. Here, Marx was crying about missing feudalism, and that the monarchy was the rest of the peoples "natural superiors," of which, Marx included himself as a superior, when he wasn't. Marx hated the idea of the new governments, after their revolutions, with the so-called bourgeoisie, and the proletarians. Marx invented differing classes, which is total bologna. Marx claimed that there was a "class struggle" between the proletarians (the poor workers) and the bourgeoisie (higher income small business owner), because the bourgeoisie had property and money. This lie, is due to the fact that, in reality, Marx hated pay based on merit. In other words, a man is paid what he's worth, due to his knowledge and skill. Now, you must ask yourself, why did he hate merit? Marx was. in fact, a lazy, drunken, lout, even though he was educated. Marx's father practically disowned him. Marx also hated Judaism and Christianity, claiming that Judaeo-Christianity was responsible for all his ills. Marx was a racist and a bigot. He went so far as to blame the Jews for the money and a merit based pay system, which is a total lie. After Marx graduated university, he became an anarchist, disturbing churches while drunk, and stirring violence over the recession during that time. He married, and was on the run, always moving around. Because his only income was from writing a few articles for a paper, and bumming money from Engels, he was dirt poor, living in squalor, and had more children that he could afford. Marx's wife, and her family, had to hide money from him, or he would blow it. He blamed this on capitalism, and religion, instead of him sobering up, and obtaining a real job based on his merit. When confronted about it, he claimed that he was too enfeebled and frail, but he was able to drink and raise hell. Today, Marx would have been a welfare king. Marx, thinking himself as everyone's superior, wanted to abolish private property, and take everyone back to feudalism, with him at the new government's helm. He created a radical political party, the Communist League, out of an underground group of anarchists and terrorists. This group was behind pushing and supporting the violence in Britain, Belgium, and France. He was hoping that these governments would collapse, and his political group would take over, with Marx and Engels at its head. As the head, he would steal everyone's property, making it the property of this new state, and he would become rich, without raising a finger to work for it. Marx was psychoanalyzed postmortem, and they stated that he was mentally ill. His actions show him to be either a psychopath or a sociopath, with narcissistic actions. His political theory was responsible for the genocide of approximately one hundred million people in eastern Europe and Asia. That doesn't count the deaths from Nazism, which could be added, since the Nazi's were socialists, whose ideology came from Marx also. Take a look at the Nazi's twenty-five point plan. Did it ever occur to anyone, where the left's ideology about not needing a report card or diploma to work came from; the ideology that everyone deserves a trophy; or where the garbage came from that is now being taught in our university's sociology departments? Let me give you a hint. Bill Ayers, a proud communist, attended a primary school in Chicago, which did not give out report cards. It was a school based on Marxist doctrine, which believes that everyone is equal. The dullards passed with flying colors, the same as those who were smarter. Would you hire one of these children to work for you, not knowing their merit? Ayers, who became a criminal, was allowed into university, and taught today's faculty.
    2
  5137. 2
  5138. 2
  5139. 2
  5140. 2
  5141. 2
  5142. 2
  5143. 2
  5144. 2
  5145. 2
  5146. 2
  5147. 2
  5148. Federalism, is, by definition, fascist. If one looks on the wall at either side of the Speaker of the House in the US House of Representatives, you will find the symbol of the Fasces. The EU is the same. "Fasces (English: /ˈfæsiːz/ FASS-eez; Latin: [ˈfaskeːs]; a plurale tantum, from the Latin word fascis, meaning "bundle"; Italian: fascio littorio) is a bound bundle of wooden rods, sometimes including an axe (occasionally two axes) with its blade emerging. The fasces is an Italian symbol that had its origin in the Etruscan civilization and was passed on to ancient Rome, where it symbolized a magistrate's power and jurisdiction. The axe originally associated with the symbol, the Labrys (Greek: λάβρυς, lábrys) the double-bitted axe, originally from Crete, is one of the oldest symbols of Greek civilization. To the Romans, it was known as a bipennis. "The image has survived in the modern world as a representation of magisterial or collective power, law, and governance. The fasces frequently occurs as a charge in heraldry: it is present on the reverse of the U.S. Mercury dime coin and behind the podium in the United States House of Representatives; and it was the origin of the name of the National Fascist Party in Italy (from which the term fascism is derived)." -- Wiki Its origins are from the Romans, and the red hat wearing Republicans. Fascism, though, is thought of as an: "authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy." The truth is, all nationalism, which means a support for the nation state controlled by its citizens, is under attack by those that want it destroyed. World domination is their game, and they want to control it all. What they claim to be against is what they actually support. "You can still keep your nation state," but we'll still control it, is left unsaid. That is the way the UN thinks of itself.
    2
  5149. 2
  5150. 2
  5151.  @sylviam6535  Yes, but using gas successfully in a US made firearm was Browning's idea, where he used a cone-shaped flapper mechanism on the muzzle to actuate a lever-action firearm, and then, he designed the Potato-Digger and the BAR. That idea was further developed by Winchester, after Browning joined them, which led to the creation of the M1 Carbine, and the Garand at Springfield. "Winchester developed the .30 Carbine cartridge for the ordnance department. Winchester at first did not submit a carbine design, as it was occupied in developing the .30-06 Winchester M2 military rifle. The M2 rifle originated as a design by Jonathan "Ed" Browning, brother of the famous firearm designer John Browning. A couple of months after Ed Browning's death in May 1939, Winchester hired David Marshall "Carbine" Williams who had begun work on a short-stroke gas piston design while serving a prison sentence at a North Carolina minimum-security work farm." Nazi Germany obtained their ideas from several designers going back to the mid-1800s, where a German first used the idea to operate the action of a single-shot breech-loading rifle. That was patented in the US and Britain, but it was all pre-Nazi. History: "The first mention of using a gas piston in a single-shot breech-loading rifle comes from 1856, by the German Edward Lindner, who patented his invention in the United States and Britain. In 1866, Englishman William Curtis filed the first patent on a gas-operated repeating rifle, but subsequently failed to develop that idea further. Between 1883 and 1885, Hiram Maxim filed a number of patents on blowback, recoil, and gas-operation. In 1885, one year after Maxim's first gas-operated patent, a British inventor called Richard Paulson, who a year before had patented a straight blowback-operated rifle and pistol, patented a gas piston-operated rifle and pistol which he claimed could be used with sliding, rotating or falling bolts. He would also patent a gas-operated revolver in 1886. It is not known whether Paulson ever constructed prototypes of his patents, but according to A. W. F. Taylerson, a firearms' historian, his patented revolver was probably workable. In the 1880s a gas piston-operated rifle and pistol were developed by the Clair Brothers of France who received a French patent and submitted prototypes for testing by the French army in 1888, although the true date of their invention is uncertain. They would also produce a semi-automatic shotgun in the early 1890s. In 1889, the Austro-Hungarian, Adolf Odkolek von Újezd, filed a patent for the first successful gas-operated machine gun." "Most current gas systems employ some type of piston. The face of the piston is acted upon by combustion gas from a port in the barrel or a trap at the muzzle. Early guns, such as Browning's "flapper" prototype, the Bang rifle, and Garand rifle, used relatively low-pressure gas from at or near the muzzle. This, combined with larger operating parts, reduced the strain on the mechanism. To simplify and lighten the firearm, gas from nearer the chamber needed to be used. This high-pressure gas has sufficient force to destroy a firearm unless it is regulated somehow. Most gas-operated firearms rely on tuning the gas port size, mass of operating parts, and spring pressures to function. Several other methods are employed to regulate the energy. The M1 carbine incorporates a very short piston, or "tappet." This movement is closely restricted by a shoulder recess. This mechanism inherently limits the amount of gas taken from the barrel. The M14 rifle and M60 GPMG use the White expansion and cutoff system to stop (cut off) gas from entering the cylinder once the piston has traveled a short distance. Most systems, however, vent excess gas into the atmosphere through slots, holes, or ports." "A gas trap system involves "trapping" combustion gas as it leaves the muzzle. This gas impinges on a surface that converts the energy to motion that, in turn, cycles the action of the firearm. As the resulting motion is forward toward the muzzle of the gun, some sort of mechanical system is needed to translate this into the rearward motion needed to operate the bolt. This adds to the complexity of the mechanism and its weight, and the placement of the trap generally results in a longer weapon and allows dirt to easily enter the mechanism. Despite these disadvantages, they used relatively low pressure gas and did not require a hole in the barrel, which made them attractive in early designs. The system is no longer used in modern weapons. "Hiram Maxim patented a muzzle-cup system in 1884 described in U.S. Patent 319,596 though it is unknown if this firearm was ever prototyped. John Browning used gas trapped at the muzzle to operate a "flapper" in the earliest prototype gas-operated firearm described in U.S. Patent 471,782, and used a slight variation of this design on the M1895 Colt–Browning machine gun "potato digger". The Danish Bang rifle used a muzzle cup blown forward by muzzle gas to operate the action through transfer bars and leverage. Other gas-trap rifles were early production M1 Garands and German Gewehr 41 (both Walther and Mauser models). "The American and German governments both had requirements that their guns operated without a hole being drilled in the barrel. Both governments would first adopt weapons and later abandon the concept. Most earlier US M1 Garand rifles were retrofitted with long-stroke gas pistons, making the surviving gas trap rifles valuable in the collector's market." Thus, the WaPo writer is a liar.
    2
  5152. 2
  5153. 2
  5154. 2
  5155. 2
  5156. 2
  5157. 2
  5158. 2
  5159. 2
  5160. 2
  5161. 2
  5162. 2
  5163. 2
  5164. 2
  5165. 2
  5166. 2
  5167. 2
  5168.  @JLCL01  The agrarians back then were wheat farmers, and their mainstay diet was bread, beer, and wine. The nomads, of course, were the meat eaters, but they also dined on bread, and drank beer and wine. They would barter between each other, and there is ancient tales about the nomads being the cyclopeans. It was said that the agrarians would swim across the river at night, to steal gold from the nomads, who first made use of it. This ancient tale originates, it's said, from the Volga river area and Persia, and it came to Greece, where it was mangled into the people having one eye, which they didn't. It's is thought that this was a Greek mistranslation for the Arimaspi (horse lover). The tale of Polyphemus is thought to have its roots here. The agrarians would run short on seed for a multitude of reasons, after the first civilizations sprang up, which had the grain banks. Many believe that the ziggurats other use was a grain bank (granary), which is why it's symbolized on fiat currency (debt or loan), along with wheat. Thus, they would borrow the grain, and pay it back after the harvest. That was the roots of banking and pawn. Those that couldn't, probably had to result in going back to their hunter gatherer days, digging for root vegetables, and living off fruits, etc, in the wild, and make due. I'm sure they hunted as well, just as do the remaining hunter gatherers in Africa, today. This communist agrarian cult is behind the green movement, which pushes veganism. It is an attack on what they see as ancient capitalism. In reality, the entire lot of them, from their early religious origins, are utterly uneducated nut cases with an equality complex.
    2
  5169. 2
  5170. 2
  5171. 2
  5172. 2
  5173. 2
  5174. 2
  5175. 2
  5176. 2
  5177. 2
  5178. 2
  5179. 2
  5180. 2
  5181. 2
  5182. 2
  5183. 2
  5184. 2
  5185. 2
  5186. 2
  5187. 2
  5188. 2
  5189. 2
  5190. 2
  5191. 2
  5192. 2
  5193. 2
  5194. 2
  5195. 2
  5196. 2
  5197. 2
  5198. 2
  5199. 2
  5200. 2
  5201. 2
  5202. 2
  5203. 2
  5204. 2
  5205. 2
  5206. 2
  5207. 2
  5208. 2
  5209. 2
  5210. 2
  5211. 2
  5212. 2
  5213.  Arabs are Semites, Jews are Scumites  It's not capitalism, per se, as long as it's well regulated, but the amoral who take advantage of it. Capitalism is banking, and the lending of money, but there are many dirty and dark people involved that corrupt it. The large corporations, and the CEOs behind this, are completely amoral. It goes back to the formation of the mob in the US, and the amoral robber barons before that. Read the article titled: Bacchanalia 2.0, at Vanity Fair, about big tech's CEOs. They are pushing this amorality today. The mob, though, really helped push this along, as they pushed the amoral "profit-any-way-you-can" agenda, and controlled the labor unions after they stripped their pensions for "investment." Their corrupt banks, and their investment funds, also financed much of today's big tech with startup capital. What became known as the Russian Mob, or the Vor, came out of this lot, as well as did the oligarchs. A multi-year investigation was started by the Belgium Secret Service, which came out in their Atlas report in the mid-nineties. They showed that this lot of the mob, CEOs, and world politicos had reached the "fourth stage" of money laundering (absolute control), and that they estimated that the cabal now controlled 50% of the world's economy. They also said that the worst of it had began in the early seventies. (See below) The UK, Switzerland, and several micronations are at the heart of it, over secrecy jurisdictions, and shell companies. That idea was brought into the US as well after the seventies. From the Atlas Report: "To comprehend this nebula, it is necessary to abandon traditional financial or political logic; this is not merely a question of nation, political party, or of ordinary economics. "Our conclusion would be that at least over the last twenty years, the economic powers, some of which m###a types, have allied themselves with political forces and organized c######l structures, and reached the 4th stage of money laundering, namely, Absolute Power. It has been specified to us that at the present moment these characters control 50% of the world economy." One can lay it all at the feet of the greedy and amoral, who took advantage of lending, and the dark unregulated secrecy banking structure that they set up after WWII, which was based upon the Swiss model of numbered accounts from the thirties.
    2
  5214. 2
  5215. 2
  5216. 2
  5217. 2
  5218. 2
  5219. 2
  5220. 2
  5221. 2
  5222. 2
  5223. 2
  5224. 2
  5225. 2
  5226. 2
  5227. 2
  5228. 2
  5229. 2
  5230. 2
  5231. 2
  5232. 2
  5233. 2
  5234. 2
  5235. The Federalist (GOP) Progressives have been beating the "racism" drum since progressivism was created, and it came from that. Progressivism originates from the first social science schools that moved into New York in 1906 from Boston into NYC, which was pre-Trotsky. The Christian Socialists came about in the late 1800s around Boston with the Church of the Carpenter, the Social Reform Union (a school), and the Karl Marx School. They were tied to the old radical abolitionists and decided to use race as a wedge issue, later, in New York. This was brought into New York City, where the Socialist Party of America set up the first successful social science school (Rand) in 1906, though they had the SRU and the KMS before that which didn't last long. The Federalists, who really created the GOP, and mainly the Radical Republicans, started using ending slavery and race, first, as an issue to hide their political misdeeds and who they really were before the war, (high tariffs and their collection, taxing private bank currency out of existence, a demand for government-issued fiat currency and a central bank, a demand for a centralized government that took away states' rights, anti-state supreme court decisions, overreach, etc), and to cover up Lincoln's true beliefs at the end of the Civil War when reconstruction came about. Much of this centered around the aftermath of what brought about the 14th Amendment, which some scholars have stated was illegal over the shenanigans Congress used to pass it by using the reconstruction acts. They had ten southern states under military control, with no representatives nor elected government in holding as non-states, and told them that they had to pass the 14 Amendment before they would gain back their states, and representatives. It was illegal for those states to vote in Congress as it was, and it was blackmail. "The first bill called for 10 of the “rebel States” to be divided into five districts under military control; only Tennessee was excluded because it had already been readmitted. The states were also required to craft new constitutions, which had to include universal male suffrage and needed approval by the U.S. Congress. In addition, they had to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans and former slaves. After completing the requirements, the states would be readmitted to the Union."__Encyclopedia Britannica Lincoln, many will find, was not only a tyrant but a racist, regardless of the history they fabricated about him to deify him and make him a martyr. The northern states, during his time, reminded one an awful lot of what befell Russia after October 1917 with the suspension of habeas corpus by the president, which was also illegal. Several scholars have stated that this was when Lincoln brought the French Revolution to US shores. The Leviathan that Jefferson, Madison, and Jackson tried to put down, succeeded and took over everything after 1865.
    2
  5236. 2
  5237. 2
  5238. 2
  5239. 2
  5240. 2
  5241. 2
  5242. 2
  5243. 2
  5244. 2
  5245. 2
  5246. 2
  5247. 2
  5248. 2
  5249. 2
  5250. 2
  5251. 2
  5252. 2
  5253. 2
  5254. 2
  5255. 2
  5256. 2
  5257. 2
  5258. 2
  5259. 2
  5260. 2
  5261. 2
  5262. 2
  5263. 2
  5264. 2
  5265. 2
  5266. 2
  5267. 2
  5268. 2
  5269. 2
  5270. 2
  5271. 2
  5272. Here's what the Institute of Economic Affairs has to say on the topic, and the book: "Is fascism making a comeback? "Quite a lot of influential people seem to think so. Over the past two years or so, there has been a flurry of books – some of them from high-profile, best-selling authors – warning us of a fascist renaissance, with titles such as How To Stop Fascism (Paul Mason), Sexual Revolution: Modern Fascism and the Feminist Fightback (Laurie Penny), How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (Jason Stanley), or Late Capitalist Fascism (Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen). "Since this renewed interest in fascism has been preceded by a revival of socialism as a popular mainstream ideology, it is perhaps unsurprising that most of the new self-declared “anti-fascists” see fascism through a Marxist lens. The orthodox Marxist perspective is that fascism is not a system or an ideology in its own right, but simply the most brutal form of capitalism. In this interpretation, liberal democracy is the form that capitalism takes when the ruling class feels secure in its position, and can afford a few superficial niceties, such as democratic elections and civil liberties. Fascism, on the other hand, is the form that capitalism takes when the ruling class feels under threat, and lashes out – it is capitalism with the gloves off. "This backdrop makes the (re-)publication of Rainer Zitelmann’s book Hitler’s National Socialism unintentionally timely and topical, because it offers, among other things, a much-needed corrective to the narrative peddled by the socialist mainstream." Yes, the socialists aren't going to like it.
    2
  5273. 2
  5274. 2
  5275. 2
  5276. 2
  5277. 2
  5278. 2
  5279. 2
  5280. 2
  5281. 2
  5282. 2
  5283. 2
  5284. We're not really bound by the Constitution now, in the US, as we have the 25th Amendment, but Congress refuses to use it over whom the VP is. 25th Amendment, Section 4: Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President. Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office. . Congress also has the means of impeachment, but they would end up with the same VP at the moment.
    2
  5285. 2
  5286. 2
  5287. 2
  5288. 2
  5289. 2
  5290. 2
  5291. 2
  5292. 2
  5293. 2
  5294. 2
  5295. 2
  5296. 2
  5297. 2
  5298. 2
  5299. 2
  5300. 2
  5301. 2
  5302. 2
  5303. 2
  5304. 2
  5305. 2
  5306. 2
  5307. 2
  5308. 2
  5309. 2
  5310. 2
  5311. 2
  5312. 2
  5313. "The elites were reigning powerful on the coasts, the intellectuals and the transnationals were running the White House." Some of the most important history to be revealed in this interview. It was universities and large international corporations controlling the White House, with the corporate elite owners living in the coastal states. These people are the Federalists, hidden as both Democrats and Republicans. Here, he called those on the right "liberal Republicans." This has been the problem, in the US, since the murder of William McKinley, and it is this same "Cliveden Set" and their "roundtables" who have been behind the ills of our nation since that time, especially big oil and international banking. Ask yourself what WWI was really about. It was the oil found in Persia in 1908, and who would take it, Britain or Germany. Those who were the war's financiers ended up with Palestine. This is the same elite group that was within the Institute of Pacific Relations, and they were behind installing Communism in Asia. They did it for control and to force the industrial revolution upon Asia, shifting it from an agrarian economy to an industrial one, no matter the cost. Remember who McKinley's assassin was? Who did he state that he was tied to? Emma Goldman? "The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." __Carroll Quigley in his book "Tragedy and Hope" "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I...was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." __Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p.950 "At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York, it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." __Carroll Quigley, pp.951-952 Quigley's interview with the Washington Post: "I learned the Round Table Group was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975) ====== "Emma Goldman (June 27 [O.S. June 15], 1869 – May 14, 1940) was an anarchist political activist and writer. She played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in North America and Europe in the first half of the 20th century. "Born in Kovno, Russian Empire (now Kaunas, Lithuania) to a Jewish family, Goldman emigrated to the United States in 1885. Attracted to anarchism after the Haymarket affair, Goldman became a writer and a renowned lecturer on anarchist philosophy, women's rights, and social issues, attracting crowds of thousands. She and anarchist writer Alexander Berkman, her lover and lifelong friend, planned to assassinate industrialist and financier Henry Clay Frick as an act of propaganda of the deed. Frick survived the attempt on his life in 1892, and Berkman was sentenced to 22 years in prison."__Wikipedia. Cecil Rhodes' roundtable consisted of the power elite Federalists in both the US and Britain. It still does to this very day. Look into the actions of Jacob H Schiff and the YMCA during the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia during 1917. This is the same YMCA involved with the Institute of Pacific Relations. Also, where was the Rand School of Social Science located, and where was Leon Trotsky living just before he made his way to Petrograd with a boatload of agitators?
    2
  5314. 2
  5315. 2
  5316. 2
  5317. 2
  5318. 2
  5319. 2
  5320. 2
  5321. 2
  5322. 2
  5323. 2
  5324. 2
  5325. 2
  5326. 2
  5327. 2
  5328. 2
  5329. 2
  5330. 2
  5331. 2
  5332. 2
  5333. 2
  5334. 2
  5335. 2
  5336. 2
  5337. 2
  5338. 2
  5339. 2
  5340. Nori Chesney: During the Tehran Conference, at the Soviet Embassy, is where, if I recall, FDR and Stalin had a private meeting, and made Churchill stay outside. It was, indeed, about the creation of the UN, and what their votes would be on the coming new security council. After the war, this process leads to the creation of the UN, and this led to Truman, and finally, the Eisenhower policy under Ike and Nixon. That policy was held confidential for a long time. I believe that this is what JFK interfered with. Bretton Woods was created in 1945, and GATT in 1947. The Eisenhower policy was about bringing down the Soviet Union, and spreading "international capitalism" around the world, at the point of a gun barrel. They did this under the guise of spreading democracy. The fall of the Soviet Union opened the door for nation toppling and building, under GHW Bush, while calling it spreading democracy. We had Korea and Vietnam before that, then, under GHW Bush, the Middle-East and Africa. We also had the same in South America and the Caribbean. Theory: If all nations are forced into capitalism, and they have a democracy, with rules-based economics, wars will end, supposedly, regardless of culture. The UN was to become the ruling treaty authority. The "liberal international order" was created with the Group of Five under Nixon, which became Reagan and Bush's NWO. That is now the G20. The G20 and the UN work hand in hand with NATO. Bretton Woods was destroyed by Nixon, and GATT was replaced by the WTO around 1993, under GHW Bush and Clinton. Bush signed the climate change agenda at Rio in 1992, which became the Rio +20, and Clinton pushed that and created NAFTA during this time frame. Three economic unions were created, the North American, the EU, and the ASEAN. All the presidents, from both parties, except Trump, have been pushing the failed Eisenhower policy, which was modified several times. Trump wishes to change the order, but has stated that a new one might need to be created, especially over China. Pompeo at Brussels: Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTr4cO8LXGA DOJ China Initiative Panel Discussion February 6, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xpCj_8a9-4&feature=emb_logo Also, read the article titled: "The Recurring Intellectual Plague of Globalization," published in the Journal of Political Risk by William R. Hawkins, "a consultant specializing in international economics and national security issues. He is a former economics professor who has served on the staff of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee.": https://www.jpolrisk.com/the-recurring-intellectual-plague-of-globalization/#more-2618
    2
  5341. 2
  5342. 2
  5343. 2
  5344. 2
  5345. 2
  5346. 2
  5347. 2
  5348. 2
  5349. 2
  5350. The dumb moron contradicted himself. First, he claimed that there was only two shots, then he claimed the first missed, but he was shot twice after. What an imbecile. It's not about how he was killed, but who was was responsible for it. It was the communists residing in the US. The new documents verify that Oswald was involved with the Communist Party USA, and so was Jack Ruby, via the Chicago mob. The SCDCP (Southern California District Communist Party), in LA, quickly held a meeting about what to do. They settled on keeping quiet, while they decided whether to "defend" Oswald, or "scream frame-up." Guss Hall, the head of CPUSA, was caught sending a letter to the Kremlin about Johnson, and he had a meeting with two other communists. Hall was afraid to leave his NY apartment for a week. The Dallas PD had leaked that Oswald had letters on CPUSA stationary, within his effects, which told him how he should proceed, and what to do about "noisy" (probably nosy) neighbors. The FBI proved that Oswald was not a FBI informant. He had no informant number, nor was he ever paid. The informant ID number that some claim he had, matched other people, and one was a hooker. If you want to know who had Kennedy killed, it was either ordered from someone at the Kremlin, by Castro, or someone within the CPUSA. There was also a report which mentioned that an informant claimed that Texan politicians may have been involved. Anyhow, you can blame the communists in the US, who also belonged to the Democratic Party, for being behind it, because of the Bay of Pigs, and our attempts at assassinating Castro, and other Cuban communists.
    2
  5351. 2
  5352. 2
  5353. 2
  5354. 2
  5355. 2
  5356. 2
  5357. 2
  5358. 2
  5359. 2
  5360. 2
  5361. 2
  5362. 2
  5363. 2
  5364. 2
  5365. 2
  5366. 2
  5367. 2
  5368. 2
  5369. 2
  5370. 2
  5371. 2
  5372. 2
  5373. 2
  5374. 2
  5375. 2
  5376. 2
  5377. 2
  5378. 2
  5379. 2
  5380. 2
  5381. 2
  5382. 2
  5383. 2
  5384. 2
  5385. 2
  5386. 2
  5387. 2
  5388. 2
  5389. 2
  5390. 2
  5391. 2
  5392. 2
  5393. 2
  5394. 2
  5395. 2
  5396. 2
  5397. 2
  5398. 2
  5399. 2
  5400. 2
  5401. 2
  5402. 2
  5403. 2
  5404. 2
  5405. 2
  5406. 2
  5407. 2
  5408. 2
  5409. 2
  5410. 2
  5411. 2
  5412. 2
  5413. 2
  5414. 2
  5415. 2
  5416. 2
  5417. 2
  5418. 2
  5419. 2
  5420. 2
  5421. 2
  5422. 2
  5423. 2
  5424. 2
  5425. 2
  5426. 2
  5427. 2
  5428. 2
  5429. 2
  5430. 2
  5431. 2
  5432. 2
  5433. 2
  5434. 2
  5435. 2
  5436. 2
  5437. 2
  5438. 2
  5439. 2
  5440. 2
  5441. 2
  5442. 2
  5443. 2
  5444. 2
  5445. 2
  5446. 2
  5447. 2
  5448. 2
  5449. 2
  5450. 2
  5451. 2
  5452. 2
  5453. 2
  5454. 2
  5455. 2
  5456. 2
  5457. 2
  5458. 2
  5459. 2
  5460. 2
  5461. 2
  5462. 2
  5463. 2
  5464. 2
  5465. 2
  5466. 2
  5467. 2
  5468. 2
  5469. 2
  5470. 2
  5471. 2
  5472. 2
  5473. 2
  5474. 2
  5475. 2
  5476. 2
  5477. 2
  5478. 2
  5479. 2
  5480. 2
  5481. 2
  5482. 2
  5483. 2
  5484. 2
  5485. 2
  5486. 2
  5487. 2
  5488. 2
  5489. 2
  5490. 2
  5491. 2
  5492. 2
  5493. Professor Carroll Quigley's interview with the Washington Post: "I learned the Round Table Group was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975) Also from Quigley: "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I...was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." __Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p.950 "At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York, it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." __Professor Carroll Quigley, pp.951-952 From Dan Smoot's book "The Invisible Government" on what has led to today's Europe: "In September, 1916, Wilson (at the urging of House) appointed a committee of intellectuals (the first President's Brain Trust) to formulate peace terms and draw up a charter for world government. This committee, with House in charge, consisted of about 150 college professors, graduate students, lawyers, economists, writers, and others. Among them were men still familiar to Americans in the 1960's: Walter Lippmann (columnist); Norman Thomas (head of the American socialist party); Allen Dulles (former head of C.I.A.); John Foster Dulles (late Secretary of State); Christian A. Herter (former Secretary of State). "These eager young intellectuals around Wilson, under the clear eyes of crafty Colonel House, drew up their charter for world government (League of Nations Covenant) and prepared for the brave new socialist one-world to follow World War I. But things went sour at the Paris Peace Conference. They soured even more when constitutionalists in the United States Senate found out what was being planned and made it quite plain that the Senate would not authorize United States membership in such a world federation. "Bitter with disappointment but not willing to give up, Colonel House called together in Paris, France, a group of his most dedicated young intellectuals–among them, John Foster and Allen Dulles, Christian A. Herter, and Tasker H. Bliss–and arranged a dinner meeting with a group of like-minded Englishmen at the Majestic Hotel, Paris, on May 19, 1919. The group formally agreed to form an organization "for the study of international affairs." "The American group came home from Paris and formed The Council on Foreign Relations, which was incorporated in 1921. "The purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations was to create (and condition the American people to accept) what House called a "positive" foreign policy for America–to replace the traditional "negative" foreign policy which had kept America out of the endless turmoil of old-world politics and had permitted the American people to develop their great nation in freedom and independence from the rest of the world. "The Council did not amount to a great deal until 1927, when the Rockefeller family (through the various Rockefeller Foundations and Funds) began to pour money into it. Before long, the Carnegie Foundations (and later the Ford Foundation) began to finance the Council. "In 1929, the Council (largely with Rockefeller gifts) acquired its present headquarters property: The Harold Pratt House, 58 East 68th Street, New York City. "In 1939, the Council began taking over the U.S. State Department. "Shortly after the start of World War II, in September, 1939, Hamilton Fish Armstrong and Walter H. Mallory, of the Council on Foreign Relations, visited the State Department to offer the services of the Council. It was agreed that the Council would do research and make recommendations for the State Department, without formal assignment or responsibility. The Council formed groups to work in four general fields–Security and Armaments Problems, Economic and Financial Problems, Political Problems, and Territorial Problems. "The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to finance, through grants, the operation of this plan. "In February, 1941, the Council on Foreign Relations' relationship with the State Department changed. The State Department created the Division of Special Research, which was divided into Economic, Security, Political, Territorial sections. Leo Pasvolsky, of the Council, was appointed Director of this Division. Within a very short time, members of the Council on Foreign Relations dominated this new Division in the State Department. "During 1942, the State Department set up the Advisory Committee on Postwar Foreign Policy. Secretary of State Cordell Hull was Chairman. The following members of the Council on Foreign Relations were on this Committee: Under Secretary of State Sumner Welles (Vice-Chairman), Dr. Leo Pasvolsky (Executive Officer); Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Isaiah Bowman, Benjamin V. Cohen, Norman H. Davis, and James T. Shotwell. "Other members of the Council also found positions in the State Department: Philip E. Mosely, Walter E. Sharp, and Grayson Kirk, among others. "The crowning moment of achievement for the Council came at San Francisco in 1945, when over 40 members of the United States Delegation to the organizational meeting of the United Nations (where the United Nations Charter was written) were members of the Council. Among them: Alger Hiss, Secretary of State Edward R. Stettinius, Leo Pasvolsky, John Foster Dulles, John J. McCloy, Julius C. Holmes, Nelson A. Rockefeller, Adlai Stevenson, Joseph E. Johnson, Ralph J. Bunche, Clark M. Eichelberger, and Thomas K. Finletter. "By 1945, the Council on Foreign Relations, and various foundations and other organizations interlocked with it, had virtually taken over the U.S. State Department. "Some CFR members were later identified as Soviet espionage agents: for example, Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie. "Other Council on Foreign Relations members–Owen Lattimore, for example–with powerful influence in the Roosevelt and Truman Administrations, were subsequently identified, not as actual communists or Soviet espionage agents, but as "conscious, articulate instruments of the Soviet international conspiracy.""__The Invisible Government, by Dan Smoot (1965) This is how Europe so easily supports Socialism, as the US led Anglo-American Establishment supports them. Essentially, European nations became vassal states to the US after WWII under the CFR, RIIA, UN, NATO, and the Atlantic Council. The CFR/RIIA world federalist clique are at the heart of it all, and have been since their creation at the end of WWI.
    2
  5494. 2
  5495. Fred Bloggs: If you notice, those such as the atheist vegan have nothing buts slurs, because they have no platform. The one which they have been promoting at rallies, matches the one that the Communist Party USA has posted. Especially the "tax the rich." It seems that's all they can spit out. One never hears raise the GDP, pay off the national debt, and drop everyone's tax, from them, because that means cutting welfare entitlements to lazy sods. It is a very dangerous game, that a group of minorities are playing with the rest of the nation, and they are funded by some of the worst people in existence, such as George Soros. We were forewarned of his "purple revolution" before it happened, and sure enough, when Hillary lost, and she finally showed her face, she wore a dress with a purple collar, and Bill wore a purple tie, flagging them to set it off. The protests started that day, and are being paid for by Soros money, and the Communist Party USA. Jeff Sessions just shut down the slush fund that was started, which Obama's DOJ had been using to funnel money into these radical groups, calling them "charities." Worse, is what they have been teaching in our primary and secondary education, turning out psychologically screwed up, cultural Marxist brats. That is what Common Core was all about, and they became their army. I know what Soros and company did to your country, and it wasn't pretty. Why some country hasn't taken him out yet, is beyond me, which was the way it used to be done in the 70s and before. France had him, and let him skate, but then, France is almost ran by communists like Soros.
    2
  5496. 2
  5497. 2
  5498. 2
  5499. 2
  5500. 2
  5501. 2
  5502. 2
  5503. 2
  5504. 2
  5505. 2
  5506. 2
  5507. 2
  5508. 2
  5509. 2
  5510. 2
  5511. 2
  5512. 2
  5513. As far as alcohol, I quote the Hon. Noah S. Sweat from Mississippi: "My friends, I had not intended to discuss this controversial subject at this particular time. However, I want you to know that I do not shun controversy. On the contrary, I will take a stand on any issue at any time, regardless of how fraught with controversy it might be. You have asked me how I feel about whiskey. All right, this is how I feel about whiskey: "If when you say whiskey you mean the devil's brew, the poison scourge, the bloody monster, that defiles innocence, dethrones reason, destroys the home, creates misery and poverty, yea, literally takes the bread from the mouths of little children; if you mean the evil drink that topples the Christian man and woman from the pinnacle of righteous, gracious living into the bottomless pit of degradation, and despair, and shame and helplessness, and hopelessness, then certainly I am against it. "But, if when you say whiskey you mean the oil of conversation, the philosophic wine, the ale that is consumed when good fellows get together, that puts a song in their hearts and laughter on their lips, and the warm glow of contentment in their eyes; if you mean Christmas cheer; if you mean the stimulating drink that puts the spring in the old gentleman's step on a frosty, crispy morning; if you mean the drink which enables a man to magnify his joy, and his happiness, and to forget, if only for a little while, life's great tragedies, and heartaches, and sorrows; if you mean that drink, the sale of which pours into our treasuries untold millions of dollars, which are used to provide tender care for our little crippled children, our blind, our deaf, our dumb, our pitiful aged and infirm; to build highways and hospitals and schools, then certainly I am for it. "This is my stand. I will not retreat from it. I will not compromise."
    2
  5514. 2
  5515. 2
  5516. 2
  5517. 2
  5518. 2
  5519. 2
  5520. 2
  5521. 2
  5522. 2
  5523. 2
  5524. 2
  5525. 2
  5526. 2
  5527. 2
  5528. 2
  5529. 2
  5530. 2
  5531. 2
  5532. 2
  5533. 2
  5534. 2
  5535. 2
  5536. 2
  5537. 2
  5538. 2
  5539. 2
  5540. 2
  5541. 2
  5542.  @danmoritz3319  "After 1816, the Federalists had no national power base apart from John Marshall's Supreme Court. They had some local support in New England, New York, eastern Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware. After the collapse of the Federalist Party in the course of the 1824 presidential election, most surviving Federalists (including Daniel Webster) joined former Republicans like Henry Clay to form the National Republican Party, which was soon combined with other anti-Jackson groups to form the Whig Party in 1833. By then, nearly all remaining Federalists joined the Whigs. However, some former Federalists like James Buchanan, Louis McLane, and Roger B. Taney became Jacksonian Democrats. "The "Old Republicans", led by John Randolph of Roanoke, refused to form a coalition with the Federalists and instead set up a separate opposition since Jefferson, Madison, Gallatin, Monroe, John C. Calhoun, and Clay had in effect adopted Federalist principles of implied powers to purchase the Louisiana Territory and after the failures and lessons of the War of 1812 raised tariffs to protect factories, chartered the Second National Bank, promoted a strong army and navy and promoted internal improvements. All these measures were opposed to the strict construction of the Constitution, which was the formal basis of the Republicans, but the drift of the party to support them could not be checked. It was aided by the Supreme Court, whose influence under John Marshall as a nationalizing factor now first became apparent. The whole change reconciled the Federalists to their absorption into the Republican Party. Indeed, they claimed, with considerable show of justice, that the absorption was in the other direction: that the Republicans had recanted and that the "Washington-Monroe policy", as they termed it after 1820, was all that Federalists had ever desired." "The party appealed to businesses and to conservatives who favored banks, national over state government, manufacturing, an army and navy, and in world affairs preferred Great Britain and opposed the French Revolution. The party favored centralization, federalism, modernization, and protectionism. "The Federalists called for a strong national government that promoted economic growth and fostered friendly relationships with Great Britain in opposition to Revolutionary France. It controlled the federal government until 1801 when it was overwhelmed by the Democratic-Republican opposition led by President Thomas Jefferson. The Federalist Party came into being between 1789 and 1790 as a national coalition of bankers and businessmen in support of Hamilton's fiscal policies." Quoting Rep. John Randolph of the "Old Republicans: “Love of peace, hatred of offensive war, jealousy of the state governments toward the general government, a dread of standing armies, a loathing of public debts, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy of the patronage of the President.”
    2
  5543. 2
  5544. 2
  5545. 2
  5546. 2
  5547. 2
  5548. MSNBC's article proves one thing: the left wing is running scared. Their big problem is, that they have overplayed their "right-wing extremists" card, just as they have their race and gender cards. Now, nobody in their right mind believes them. The author of the article: "Cynthia Miller-Idriss is a sociologist and professor in the School of Public Affairs and in the School of Education, and runs the Polarization and Extremism Research & Innovation Lab (PERIL)." Another left-wing intellectual extremist. See below: "Miller-Idriss writes frequently for mainstream audiences. She is an opinion columnist at MSNBC, and has additional recent by-lines in Foreign Affairs, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Boston Globe, CNN, The Hill, Politico, The Guardian, Le Monde, Salon, and more. She appears regularly in the media as an expert source and political commentator, including regular appearances on Fareed Zakaria GPS as well as other CNN news programs, PBS News Hour, NPR's Morning Edition and All Things Considered, MSNBC's Meet the Press Daily with Chuck Todd and Hardball with Chris Matthews, NBC's Evening News with Lester Holt and The Today Show, C-SPAN's Washington Journal, ABC's Good Morning America, and in global news outlets in over a dozen countries, including BBC News, Deutsche Welle, France 24, al Jazeera and more. "Dr. Miller-Idriss’ research has been funded by grants and fellowships from the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.K. Cabinet, the Lumina Foundation, the Spencer Foundation, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the Economic and Social Research Council (U.K.) and the Goethe Institute, among others. From 2009-2012 she was a nominated fellow in the Teagle Foundation’s National Forum on the Future of Liberal Education. She has received several research and teaching awards, including the 2019 DC Sociological Society's Morris Rosenberg Award and a 2013-14 global fellowship from Morphomata Center for Advanced Studies at the Universität zu Köln, Germany. Dr. Miller-Idriss serves on the international advisory board of the Center for Research on Extremism (C-REX) in Oslo, Norway, and is a member of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)." -- American University faculty article on her. A rather left-wing extremist résumé, I'd say.
    2
  5549. 2
  5550. 2
  5551. 2
  5552. 2
  5553. 2
  5554. 2
  5555. 2
  5556. 2
  5557. 2
  5558. 2
  5559. 2
  5560. 2
  5561. 2
  5562. 2
  5563. 2
  5564. 2
  5565. 2
  5566. 2
  5567. 2
  5568. 2
  5569. 2
  5570. 2
  5571. 2
  5572. 2
  5573. 2
  5574. 2
  5575. 2
  5576. 2
  5577. 2
  5578. 2
  5579. 2
  5580. 2
  5581. 2
  5582. 2
  5583. 2
  5584. Odd, don't you think, that the revolution that brought us socialism, the radical left, and the anarchists, brought us the same French satire? There was a lot of satire published in France, which people still believe to be fact. The pen name of Leo Taxil comes to mind, as he was another French anarchist. The intellectuals of mainland Europe, mainly French, Austrian, and German, brought the world both socialism and communism, and the 1917 revolution. However, one also needs to ask themselves why Hinduism appears in both of these works. I would look at Martinism for the answers to how and why. In fact, early fascism believed in neo-Hinduism (Free State of Fiume, Gabriele d'Annunzio, and Guido Keller), as it was a fad in France and Italy while Mussolini, a socialist, was still running his newspaper (1910 and after). However, Mussolini "rejected egalitarianism, a core doctrine of socialism." Neo-Hinduism and Martinism are also the root of what became the German's Black Sun Society. Here, the Germans mixed ancient paganism with it, and Himmler created a new religion for the SS. Mussolini, though, was "influenced by Nietzsche's anti-Christian ideas and negation of God's existence. Mussolini felt that socialism had faltered, in view of the failures of Marxist determinism and social democratic reformism, and believed that Nietzsche's ideas would strengthen socialism. While associated with socialism, Mussolini's writings eventually indicated that he had abandoned Marxism and egalitarianism in favor of Nietzsche's übermensch concept and anti-egalitarianism. [sic]" Though many Je###h scholars were involved, so were many protestants, and it all centers in the European academe, both during, and after, the French Revolution.
    2
  5585. 2
  5586. 2
  5587. 2
  5588. 2
  5589. 2
  5590. Background The Criminal Case (under Obama) . "The defendants in this case were indicted in June of 2012 on five counts related to providing financial support to al-Shabaab, a Somali militia group that was designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department on February 26, 2008. During the lower court proceedings, the defendants filed motions to suppress evidence collected pursuant to warrants and electronic surveillance orders issued under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which the court denied. The defendants also requested that their security-cleared counsel be granted access to pertinent FISA applications and related materials in order to prepare their legal and constitutional defenses. The defendants were ultimately convicted by a jury on February 22, 2013. "Following the conviction, it was revealed in June 2013 that the National Security Agency (NSA) had been collecting all domestic and international telephone metadata from major US providers for more than ten years. During congressional hearings before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence following the Snowden revelations, the Deputy Director of the FBI specifically cited the Moalin case as an example of an investigation where the NSA Metadata program had been used to identify the suspect. The defendants subsequently filed a motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 on November 14, 2013, based on the NSA revelations and the government's failure to produce evidence related to the pertinent FISA court applications and materials. In particular, Mr. Moalin argued that the FBI had only reopened his case in 2007 as a result of a tip generated by the NSA Metadata program. "The court denied the defendants' motion for a new trial. The defendants subsequently filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit, which is currently pending." (Case now decided) https://epic.org/amicus/fisa/215/moalin/
    2
  5591. 2
  5592. 2
  5593. 2
  5594. 2
  5595. 2
  5596. 2
  5597. 2
  5598. 2
  5599. 2
  5600. 2
  5601. 2
  5602. 2
  5603. 2
  5604. 2
  5605. 2
  5606. 2
  5607. Do you remember the Reform Party started by Ross Perot? It was infiltrated and taken over, after his run, by the worst dregs of the far-left and far-right, who joined forces with the greens (environmentalists). In 1999, Trump used this party, it is said at Gov Ventura's request, to test the waters to run for president. After Trump saw his results in California, he quickly left the party. In an interview on the Today Show, Trump exposed them. This political alliance never went away. It is known as the Red-Green-Brown Alliance, and it is led by these very people, and backed by the likes of George Soros, Henry Kissinger, the Rockefellers, and the other globalists. "Trump considered himself a conservative, but criticized Pat Buchanan, saying: 'I'm on the conservative side, but Buchanan is Attila the Hun.' He withdrew from the race citing the party's infighting, as did Jesse Ventura and the Minnesota Reform Party. Donald Trump stated: 'So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.'" "Pat Buchanan decided to leave the Republican Party because: 'The Republican Party at the national level has ceased to be my party. This divorce began around the end of the Cold War when President (George H W) Bush declared it to be a New World-order party and began intervening all over the world. While he and I were allies and friends during the Cold War, I just felt that once the Cold War was over the United States should return to a more traditional non-intervention foreign policy.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America President Trump has never supported the NWO, and he is not anywhere as far-right as Buchanan. Note Buchanan's ties to Nixon, GHW Bush, and McCain. Also, look for their N_zi connections. The real history, going back to 1945. John J. Mearsheimer, Univ. of Chicago, (2019), "Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order": https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/isec_a_00342
    2
  5608. 2
  5609. 2
  5610. 2
  5611. 2
  5612. 2
  5613. 2
  5614. 2
  5615. 2
  5616. 2
  5617. 2
  5618. 2
  5619. 2
  5620. 2
  5621. 2
  5622. 2
  5623. 2
  5624. 2
  5625. 2
  5626. 2
  5627. 2
  5628. 2
  5629. 2
  5630. 2
  5631. It's great until that nation state wants to create unions with other states, whereby, after that, they then desire to keep expanding, and create a world government conquering all. That has always been the desire of despots. Most every powerful nation after the Peace of Westphalia, at some point in time, has wanted to expand and conquer states outside of them to exploit. Some poor nations will readily latch onto the idea to join up, as they see joining as a way to overcome their poverty and debt. In the states that aren't ailing, they are conquered. This has led to several major wars. Since 1918, and especially after WWII, there have been some that have wished to conquer the world, and create a world government, where every living soul would fall under an international criminal court, thus, leaving the people with nowhere to flee for asylum (innocent or not), thus, forcing them to be placed under one international law, or a world government. They also want every nation to be dependent upon a large central banking cartel. The World Bank Group became one of those. The World Federalist Movement is the major player behind most of this, and they were mainly founded by international socialists, which is what Leon Trotsky had supported. Trotsky hated Stalin, calling him a "nationalist" because he didn't want to expand at that time. Trotsky didn't live long enough to see that expansion occur in Eastern Europe. However, he saw the Germans do it. His followers, still today, want this very thing, and they're close to achieving that goal. For a long time, nationalistic Federalism has had two lines of political philosophy from the start, and they are Jeffersonian Republicanism, which is Aristotelian, and that of Hamiltonian Federalism, which is Hobbesian. Jefferson believed in a small nation state, and a limited governing union, whereas Hamilton believed in the opposite, which was that of a big brother expansive nation. After the US Civil War, Hamilton's system (the American System) grew under the new GOP, which was opposite in belief of that of Jefferson's, where it has spread around the world. The socialists love it, as well as the Anglo-American Establishment (New York and London).
    2
  5632. 2
  5633. 2
  5634. 2
  5635. 2
  5636. 2
  5637. 2
  5638. 2
  5639. 2
  5640. 2
  5641. 2
  5642. 2
  5643. 2
  5644. 2
  5645. 2
  5646. 2
  5647. 2
  5648. 2
  5649. 2
  5650. 2
  5651. 2
  5652. 2
  5653. 2
  5654. 2
  5655. 2
  5656. 2
  5657. 2
  5658. 2
  5659. 2
  5660. 2
  5661. 2
  5662. 2
  5663. 2
  5664. 2
  5665. 2
  5666. 2
  5667. 2
  5668. 2
  5669. 2
  5670. 2
  5671. 2
  5672. 2
  5673. 2
  5674. 2
  5675. 2
  5676. 2
  5677. 2
  5678. 2
  5679. 2
  5680. 2
  5681. 2
  5682. 2
  5683. 2
  5684. 2
  5685. 2
  5686. 2
  5687. 2
  5688. 2
  5689. 2
  5690. 2
  5691. 2
  5692. 2
  5693. 2
  5694. 2
  5695. 2
  5696. 2
  5697. 2
  5698. 2
  5699. 2
  5700. 2
  5701. 2
  5702. 2
  5703. 2
  5704. 2
  5705. 2
  5706. There are several reasons behind it, but the main one is forced integration and acculturation by those still pushing for an Atlantic Union started by Rhodes. I'm pretty sure that you've read Streit's book, Union Now, which was about this very topic. Streit, a socialist, was a Rhodes disciple that was pushing for an eventual world government, which is what the Rhodes Scholarship was started to help along. This was Trotsky's wish as well with international socialism. "In Streit's own words, Atlantic Union, now expanded to include Western Europe, was the first step towards 'total world government:' It [Union Now] proclaimed the need of world government and insisted that no country needed this more urgently than the United States. Streit, who has been a close associate of Communists and socialists all his adult life, has no hostility towards collectivism. He said in Union Now: 'Democracy not only allows mankind to choose freely between capitalism and collectivism, but it includes Marxist governments.' In his pamphlets, Streit asks the question: 'Does the rise of socialism in some Western European democracies prevent our federating with them?' He answers with an emphatic 'No !'" [SIC] "The work for Atlantic Union is being worked towards by the Streit Council." _Wiki on Atlantic Union. Though the World Federalists are pushing for the same thing. I just read an article at the Institute of World Politics titled: Building the Atlantic World, by Tierney Jr. (Dec. 4th, 2020), which stated: "Strausz-Hupe, a native of Austria who would later serve as U.S. Ambassador to five separate posts including NATO, had long held this view in his writings. In 1942, as world war raged throughout the globe, he predicted that “As policy evolves toward several continental systems and technology accentuates the importance of large, contiguous areas, the national state will be a thing of the past” (Geopolitics: The Struggle for Space and Power). "Such a vision, held for centuries by others but never realized in full, still remains a theoretical construct, despite the European Union (1992), several trade groups, and other associated but “fraternal” unities. England’s “Brexit” departure and the move toward centralized regimes in eastern Europe demonstrates [SIC] the tensions that still dominate between national vs. transnational political allegiance. "The 'status quo' remains an alive and powerful intellectual mindset that continues to retard the momentum that 'Atlantic Union' adherents still seek. 'Rome wasn’t built in a day' may serve as a reminder for patience and deliberation, but slogans do not necessarily serve causation." [SIC]
    2
  5707. 2
  5708. 2
  5709. 2
  5710. 2
  5711. 2
  5712. 2
  5713. 2
  5714. 2
  5715. 2
  5716. 2
  5717. 2
  5718. 2
  5719. 2
  5720. 2
  5721. 2
  5722. 2
  5723. 2
  5724. diatonicjon: It's not binary, just facts about what happened. The left consists of far-left socialists, (progressives, open communists, and fellow travelers, along with Antifa), then there are those whom are a little more moderate, who actually sympathize with the Nazis and Fascists, and still do, (the KKK, etc), and last, the Neoliberals, whom are moderate-socialist and globalist. Unions always side with the left, and they have shown themselves to be violent in their strikes. Socialists have always used violence as a means to an end, and they have since the French Revolution. Hillary and Bill wore purple for a reason, when she first appeared after losing the election. The "Purple Revolution" was all pre-planned if she lost. The right has the Neocons, (Bush, Cheney et al), whom are pretty close to the same as the Neoliberals, in their thinking, except that they're a little more conservative, but still back globalism. After that, you have the moderate conservatives, who support things such as Social Security, and helping the truly needy, such as the infirm and handicapped, but are against welfare entitlements to those that can work. Then, at the far right, there are those who are against any government program, and are for a very small and limited federal government. The right, (Republicans), though, have always been against using violent groups, especially with strikes, protests, and riots. That's why more people of religion are on the right, especially Protestants. However, socialism exists all through the left, and to a lesser amount, right of center, with the neocons (Bush Family). In Germany, when Antifa was formed in the thirties, it consisted of both Communists and National Socialists. They wanted to work together to run Germany. As Hitler came to power, he dropped some of the National Socialist's twenty-five point plan, as he used the banks, and worked with a few wealthy industrialists. Also, he went after the Communists in his purges. When WWII was over, Antifa rose again, but this time, they hated the Nazis, and especially the Italian Fascists, because they weren't socialist enough, and the Nazis had turned on them. The so-called Alt-Right, (alternative to the right), consists of Nazi and Fascist sympathizers, along with Klan members. So, there's two left-wing groups, Alt-Right vs. Antifa, at each other's throats. Hillary made the mistake of trying to associate the Alt-Right with the Republican Party, since many of us know their true history. The truth came out, even about the alt-right's leader. Worse, in Charlottesville, it was the Vice-Mayor, who is a member of the Black Panthers, (a communist front group), along with the ACLU, who set that confrontation up. Socialist ideology verses capitalist and conservative ideology is the divide, and that makes the two parties. There are moderate to the extreme on both sides. The main difference that affects me the most, is that the right isn't anywhere near as violent, and it is pro liberty and natural rights.
    2
  5725. 2
  5726. 2
  5727. 2
  5728. 2
  5729. 2
  5730. 2
  5731. 2
  5732. 2
  5733. 2
  5734. 2
  5735. 2
  5736. 2
  5737. 2
  5738. 2
  5739. 2
  5740. 2
  5741. 2
  5742. 2
  5743. 2
  5744. 2
  5745. 2
  5746. 2
  5747. 2
  5748. 2
  5749.  @CynicalBastard  The European elite (nobles/power elite) and the church have been wanting their old Holy Roman empire back since they started losing control of it in the 17th century with republicanism. That is why everything that concerns the EU is in Belgium, the seat of Pepin of Herstal, Charlemagne's great-grandfather. Federalism, which is what the US Govt was based upon, is the Roman form of government, and that was a plutocracy. The same goes for the City of London or old Londinium, and they financed the American Revolution. They supposedly reminded George III of that, to "the point of treason." Charlemagne was crowned "Emperor of the Romans" by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day at Rome's Old St. Peter's Basilica... [and] has been called the "Father of Europe" (Pater Europae), as he united most of Western Europe for the first time since the classical era of the Roman Empire and united parts of Europe that had never been under Frankish or Roman rule. His rule spurred the Carolingian Renaissance, a period of energetic cultural and intellectual activity within the Western Church. Emperors of the Holy Roman Empire considered themselves successors of Charlemagne, as did the French and German monarchs." The Carolingians want their rule back, just as the church and monarchial state led colonialism against the heathen New World. By authority of the monarchs, the monopoly companies took the new lands. During the talks in 1814, Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia spoke of stomping out republicanism and retaking control. France was there but only in attendance. Britain, supposedly, didn't fully side with them and protected North America with its navy. Later, during the presidency of McKinley, some in the US thought about merging the nation with Russia, creating a super-state, and Britain couldn't have that. McKinley was murdered. The Anglo-American Establishment originates afterward, and that is the progressive federalist movement. Both governments were behind the creation of the UN and EU, as well as the Atlantic Council. Colonialism and imperialism writ large.
    2
  5750. 2
  5751. 2
  5752. 2
  5753. 2
  5754. 2
  5755. 2
  5756. 2
  5757. 2
  5758. 2
  5759. 2
  5760. 2
  5761. 2
  5762. 2
  5763. 2
  5764. 2
  5765. 2
  5766. 2
  5767. 2
  5768. 2
  5769. 2
  5770. 2
  5771. 2
  5772. 2
  5773. 2
  5774. 2
  5775. 2
  5776. 2
  5777. 2
  5778. 2
  5779. 2
  5780. 2
  5781. 2
  5782. 2
  5783. 2
  5784. 2
  5785. 2
  5786. 2
  5787. 2
  5788. 2
  5789. 2
  5790. 2
  5791. 2
  5792. 2
  5793. 2
  5794. 2
  5795. 2
  5796. 2
  5797. 2
  5798. 2
  5799. 2
  5800. 2
  5801. 2
  5802. 2
  5803. 2
  5804. 2
  5805. 2
  5806. 2
  5807. 2
  5808. 2
  5809. 2
  5810. 2
  5811. 2
  5812. 2
  5813. 2
  5814. 2
  5815. 2
  5816. "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas."__George Brock Chisholm, former Director of the U.N. World Health Organization, Psychiatry (1946) also as quoted by Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM) Famous Quotes About Rights and Liberty, Form #08.001 (2014). "For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century."__Prof. Carroll Quigley about the Cliveden Set, Round Table Groups, the CFR/RIIA, and the UN. "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I...was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." __Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p.950 "At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York, it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company.... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." __Carroll Quigley, pp.951-952 Quigley interview Washington Post: "I learned the Round Table Group was very influential,” Quigley says. "I knew they were the real founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and I knew they were the founders of the Institute of Pacific Relations. I knew that they were the godfathers of the Council on Foreign Relations. So I began to put this thing together and I found that this group was working for a number of things. "It was a secret group. Its members were working to federate the English-speaking world. They were closely linked to international bankers. They were working to establish what I call a three-power world: England and the U.S., Hitler's Germany and Soviet Russia. They said, 'We can control Germany because it is boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the Russians. The Russians will behave because they're boxed in between the Atlantic bloc and the American Navy in Singapore.’ Now, notice that this is essentially a balance of power system."__Carroll Quigley, The Washington Post Sunday Magazine, "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23rd, 1975) This is the same group that helped put Lenin, Stalin, and Mao in power, and they back Xi. It is the Old Guard faction in the US.
    2
  5817. 2
  5818. 2
  5819. What the US did: In several books, there is a published account of LBJ being quoted, while on Air Force One, which was told by the steward. Supposedly, LBJ had a couple of governors on board, and the steward overhead them discussing Johnson's "Great Society" policy, which was when much of the government's welfare was introduced or expanded under the "war on poverty." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Society#Programs The US Government ran a psyop on the public during that time, and the media was complicit in helping them do it. They searched around America, high and low, to find people in abject poverty to photograph. They would show these photos on TV, and claim that it was everywhere, especially in Appalachia. It was a bald faced lie. Appalachia was the home of coal and steel, and most all of the jobs were union. There was very low unemployment in Appalachia during LBJ's years. The government went so far as to back the production of the Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, and Petticoat Junction, which did nothing but upset the people of Appalachia, as this was not the way people acted, nor lived. That being said, the steward aboard the plane with LBJ overheard him say that the great society programs would be used to buy the black sector's vote. He quoted LBJ, who was a racist according to the left's own description, as saying "I'll have the n#####s voting Democrat for the next two hundred years." Needless to say, that was when the black population left the GOP, which they had been with since the Civil War, changing their politics to the Democratic Party. Of course, the left has denied LBJ saying this, but numerous people, who met him, called him a flaming racist.
    2
  5820. 2
  5821. 2
  5822. 2
  5823. 2
  5824. 2
  5825. 2
  5826. 2
  5827. 2
  5828. 2
  5829. 2
  5830. RoboBear: There's a political party, and it's not the Democrats or Republicans, who are behind most of the unions, especially the Service Workers. That party is the CPUSA, along with the DSA. When Sweeney was the president of the AFL-CIO, after Vietnam, he was behind the push to allow card-carrying communists to become union members, and be allowed into positions at the union HQ. Sweeney was also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, which is nothing but another name for the CPUSA to hide it. Yes, the unions are a monopoly racket, based on violence, and have been since their founding. They can destroy the economy, and have within state economies. The UAW is proof of that. "The October League organized the founding congress of the Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) in 1977. During this period a few other new communist movement organizations also formed new communist parties. "Unlike the majority of New Communist Movement groups, the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement (DRUM), which evolved into the League of Revolutionary Black Workers (LRBW), was formed by factory workers rather than student activists. The AFL-CIO leadership supported the Vietnam War and sought to avoid strikes, but union workers saw through this and independently organized a series of wildcat strikes. Radical Marxist and other African-American auto workers subsequently formed DRUM. From 1968 to 1971 DRUM and the league acted as a dual union, with black leadership, within the United Auto Workers. In the late 1970s, a group labeled the May 19th Communist Organization was created, going on a bombing campaign."
    2
  5831. kevlarandchrome: I've thought about it. What many don't know, is that the union workers in the British coal industry, are responsible for the global warming con. They were on strike during the time of Margret Thatcher, and the price of oil had started to skyrocket, along with its availability. She pushed for nuclear power over it, to stop the unions, and when a crackpot scientist claimed that CO2 was what was causing the warming, she used that to her advantage, and the British Government stated financing universities to look into it. That created the monster that we have now, and it's all about funding to universities and NGOs. Once it is revealed that CO2 lags behind warming as much as 800 years, they'll all lose their funding. CO2 doesn't cause warming, but warming causes a rise in CO2. The truth is just starting to be revealed. The Communist Party, within the US, has had its fingers in union business for many years, going back to the thirties. They controlled the dock workers in California and were behind many strikes there. Will Geer, the elderly gay communist who played Grandpa Walton, along with his male communist lover, who dressed in a skirt, was arrested at one of those strikes. They were behind inciting the violence. The communists and socialists in Britain and Europe are behind their union strikes and have been since the 1800s. They shut the energy industry down, using violence, to get their way. Those same caliber of people, in Germany, were behind forming Antifa in the thirties.
    2
  5832. 2
  5833. 2
  5834. 2
  5835. 2
  5836. 2
  5837. 2
  5838. 2
  5839. 2
  5840. 2
  5841. 2
  5842. 2
  5843. 2
  5844. 2
  5845. 2
  5846. 2
  5847. 2
  5848. 2
  5849. 2
  5850. 2
  5851. 2
  5852. 2
  5853. 2
  5854. 2
  5855. 2
  5856. 2
  5857. It all boils down to the ancient three estates and the Aryan's claim to wealth and rule. They controlled the religion, the land, the money, and the government. The third estate was seen as chattel and sheep, to use as the landed (the Baal - landlord) saw fit. The first and second estates saw themselves as the shepherds and cattle herders. This same ruling elite class kept control for thousands of years until the rebellions in Bohemia and Poland, where Socinianism started. However, it was a radical approach, where they wanted to revert the world back to the time of Eden, and where they claimed that there was no law. They (radical Hussites) were called Edenists, and later, Socialists. The enlightenment came from this, as well as the Glorius Revolution, then the American Revolution. Both were a good thing, but neither was as radicalized as what was to come in France. The French Revolution set up the divide for the far-left, and to counter that, a far-right. Also, the same socialist power elite took control of Socialism in secondary education before Hegel. Here, it changed from wanting no law at all, to demand a big brother government that would force radical socialism and a redistribution of wealth on the public. In reality, it was the power elite reasserting their control. The French Revolution, the German Union, and the later creation of Communism and National Socialism was the result. When the far left or right complain about the founders and framers of the US as well as the Constitution and try to destroy the Republic, they expose themselves and show what they truly are. They're radical socialists, and believe it or not, Edenism is still alive and well, today. The founders and framers were much smarter than the credit they're given, as they foresaw what was to come.
    2
  5858. 2
  5859. 2
  5860. 2
  5861. 2
  5862. 2
  5863. 2
  5864. 2
  5865. 2
  5866. 2
  5867. 2
  5868. 2
  5869. 2
  5870. 2
  5871. 2
  5872. 2
  5873. 2
  5874. 2
  5875. 2
  5876. 2
  5877. 2
  5878. 2
  5879. 2
  5880. 2
  5881. 2
  5882. 2
  5883. 2
  5884. 2
  5885. 2
  5886. 2
  5887. 2
  5888. 2
  5889. 2
  5890. 2
  5891. 2
  5892. 2
  5893. 2
  5894. 2
  5895. 2
  5896. 2
  5897. 2
  5898. It all boils down to a small percentage of the society, mainly the very wealthy internationalists, who wish to open up the entire world for profit, for which they also intend on controlling. Some want to go so far as to revert society back to what it was at the start of the industrial revolution, to make everyone "equal," except the small minority of wealthy corporate aristocrats who wish to rule it all. This lot of wealthy internationalists wants no differing cultures, no competition, no borders, no religion, no individuality, and for everyone to think alike, becoming a totally amoral society, with a belief in nothing. They want worker drones, or chattle. Below, I quote the first director of the WHO, George Brock Chisholm MD: “The re-interpretation and eventually (sic) eradication of the concept of right and wrong, which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith... are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy. The fact is, that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respectable people have escaped from these moral chains and are able to observe and think freely.”_George Brock Chisholm MD, Psych. “Children must be free to think in all directions irrespective of the peculiar ideas of parents who often seal their children's minds with preconceived prejudices and false concepts of past generations. Unless we are very careful, very careful indeed, and very conscientious, there is still great danger that our children may turn out to be the same kind of people we are.”_George Brock Chisholm MD, Psych. “...the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.”_George Brock Chisholm MD, Psych. This is what has been bandied about by the WHO and the UN since its founding, and this is why race and culture, etc, are now being attacked at the universities. They blame the public, not themselves, nor their corporations and governments, for war and prejudice.
    2
  5899. 2
  5900. 2
  5901. 2
  5902. 2
  5903. 2
  5904. 2
  5905. 2
  5906. 2
  5907. 2
  5908. 2
  5909. 2
  5910. 2
  5911. 2
  5912. 2
  5913. 2
  5914. 2
  5915. 2
  5916. 2
  5917. 2
  5918. 2
  5919. 1
  5920. In 1960, Reagan wrote to Nixon about leaving the Democratic Party. In fact, he was writing about JFK before he was elected, and stated that "under the tousled boyish haircut, is still old Karl Marx." Reagan went on to say that "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the party left me." That is when communism started to take over the Democratic Party, and now, there is nothing "democratic" about it, since they have injected socialism into the US, and have been attempting to dismantle the Constitution. The majority, though, started under Johnson, with the "great society" programs. Johnson and the leftists ran photos in the media, showing families living in decrepit shacks in Appalachia, which hardly existed at all, to pander at the heart's of the people. Most everyone was middle class, in Appalachia, and were working in union coal mines, etc. Johnson and the media lied. Did you ever wonder why Hollywood produced the Beverly Hillbillies? I am older than Styxhexenhammer666, and was at Ohio State in the late eighties. They were already injecting Marxist ideology into the sociology departments then, and when you walked outside those ivy covered walls, you had the Students for a Democratic Society, a known communist front group, trying to recruit you. That group actually disappeared for a while, but are now back in full force. The SDS was founded by Aryeh Neier, a devout communist, and a good friend of George Soros. Neier ran Soros' Open Society Institute after leaving the ACLU. Yes, you read that correctly. I thought that I was a Democrat, when I became a college freshman, but that changed quickly, once I learned of what was taking place. I have been a Republican ever since. Have a guess at who was a guest speaker at the Feminist protest in DC. It was Angela Davis, who ran in the VP spot with Guss Hall, for the Communist Party USA ticket in 1980 and 1984. The CPUSA didn't run anyone after that, but they openly supported Obama, Sanders, and Clinton. They supported every Democratic candidate from 1988 on.
    1
  5921. 1
  5922. 1
  5923. 1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. David Stewart I did not write that, as I directly quoted it from the leftists and Marxist's literature. It was written by Alinsky, Cloward, and Piven, which is quoted regularly by Bill Ayers. Ayers even quoted Alinsky's writing, when he debated Dinesh D'Souza at Dartmouth. You'll have to determine if what Alinsky stated is true, the same as I. Below is where the use of "political correctness" originates from, and how to use it against your enemy. This is from chapter three (A Word About Words) of Saul Alinsky's book, Rules for Radicals. Rules for Radicals, pp 49-51, Quote: "The question may legitimately be raised, why not use other words—words that mean the same but are peaceful, and do not result in such negative emotional reactions? There are a number of fundamental reasons for rejecting such substitution. First, by using combinations of words such as "harnessing the energy" instead of the single word "power," we begin to dilute the meaning; and as we use purifying synonyms, we dissolve the bitterness, the anguish, the hate and love, the agony and the triumph attached to these words, leaving an aseptic imitation of life. In the politics of life we are concerned with the slaves and the Caesars, not the vestal virgins. It is not just that, in communication as in thought, we must ever strive toward simplicity. (The masterpieces of philosophic or scientific statement are frequently no longer than a few words, for example, "E = mc2.") It is more than that: it is a determination not to detour around reality. To use any other word but power is to change the meaning of everything we are talking about. As Mark Twain once put it, "The difference between the right word and the almost-right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug." "Power is the right word just as self-interest, compromise, and the other simple political words are, for they were conceived in and have become part of politics from the beginning of time. To pander to those who have no stomach for straight language, and insist upon bland, non-controversial sauces, is a waste of time. They cannot or deliberately will not understand what we are discussing here. "I agree with Nietzsche's statement in The Genealogy of Morals on this point: ""Why stroke the hypersensitive ears of our modern weaklings? Why yield even a single step . . . to the Tartuffery of words? For us psychologists that would involve a Tartuffery of action . . . For a psychologist today shows his good taste (others may say his integrity) in this, if in anything, that he resists the shamefully moralized manner of speaking which makes all modern judgments about men and things slimy."" End Quote. Here, it is taught, that if you use peaceful words, you dilute the meaning (making them an aseptic imitation) of your opponent's words, while making your opponent look "slimy", cruel, bigoted, etc. These so-called peaceful words are used to hide truthful facts. This is why Hillary called a good majority of Americans a "basket of deplorables", along with the rant about people being sexists, fascists, etc., because we agreed with Trump, when he said "radical Islamic terrorists". When you look into this, the rabbit hole goes deep.
    1
  5928. When you have a corrupt Marxist President, who has ties to the corrupt radical Marxist revolutionary activists, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, (who were involved in bombing American cities), and this President puts into place these agency heads, then what can you expect? Hillary Rodham was born in Chicago, (where Obama, Ayers, and Dohrn are from). Hillary idolized the Marxist radical, Saul Alinsky; writing her senior dissertation about the Marxist criminal, so one can see where this corruption was not only taught, but where it originates from. Saul Alinsky taught Francis Fox Piven at Chicago, who was the co-author of the Marxist Cloward-Piven Strategy in 1966, written in The Nation magazine. Just last year, 2015, Piven wrote another article for The Nation, bragging about how everything was falling into place. Let's look at how much of this plan the DNC has put into place. LBJ brought in the Welfare portion. Bill Clinton brought in NAFTA to destroy the economy, sending work out of the US. Hillary tried healthcare but it failed. Obama brings in Common Core, takes religion out of schools, and takes out the state control of education. He then brings the national debt up to a unsustainable level, and brings in healthcare that was designed to fail. Hillary's task was to socialize healthcare after it failed, and go after the 2nd Amendment by stacking the Supreme Court and using executive orders. Obama has already used executive orders against guns, which was not spoken of in the press. Obama and Hillary want to tax the rich and make them pay. Almost all of the eight steps of the Cloward-Piven Strategy have been implemented. Cloward-Piven Strategy: "Eight steps to topple a nation and create a socialist state." (From The Nation magazine): 1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people. 2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income). 6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
    1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933. 1
  5934. 1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. For them to put up the fallacy of Baphomet, as some call it, which was an invention of Eliphas Levi, and didn't exist before he had an artist draw it in 1856, shows that they are an utter moron, and do not really have any knowledge of theology or biblical history. In other words, what a so-called satan worshiper thinks is real, is a fallacy. They are worshiping a fake idol, which was an 1856 invention of a snake oil salesman. The word, Baphomet, if that is how it was meant to be pronounced, was an invention of King Philip the Fair of France, which he used in a scam to rob the Templar banks, since they were the royal bankers. He threatened to send the Pope back to Italy, to a certain death, to get him to go along with the scam. Earlier, King Philip had robbed the Goldsmiths, then the Lombard Bankers, because of his excessive spending, and kicked them out of the country. His next and final step, was to not only rob the banks, but the army that controlled them. He succeeded, by accusing them of heresy, and using the inquisition and a cowardly pope on the take, to convict them. He invented Baphomet, again, if that was what he was trying to pronounce, and claimed that the Templars were worshiping such a thing. Of course, some admitted to it, because they were under the most cruel torture that could be placed on them, where he had them sign a prewritten confession. They recanted everything as he had them killed. Baphomet was supposedly invented by the king, from a word that a Crusader used to describe a Mosque, which he had heard, and that he had written as "Bafumarias" in 1098. So, in reality, whoever put that up, is celebrating the worst cruelty and hate of a corrupt, murdering, and pathetic thief-king. If any good Floridian would, drive over it with a truck.
    1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957. 1
  5958. 1
  5959. 1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. I find that funny, that you find the 2nd amendment interpretation wrong, when this has been settled by the Supreme Court, many times, by those with more education on the subject than you, and it also seems that you have never read factual US history, about why the term, militia, does not mean the army, but does define the citizens of the United States; every legal citizen. Both had the right to carry those guns, period. However, BAIR might be in trouble for breaking the bigotry and hate crime laws of the US, and they might be arrested and tried over it, if their identities are verified. They wore those masks for a reason, as they knew they were openly breaking this law. "Defined in the 1999 National Crime Victim Survey, "A hate crime is a criminal offense. In the United States, federal prosecution is possible for hate crimes committed on the basis of a person's race, religion, or nation origin when engaging in a federally protected activity." In 2009, the Matthew Shepard Act added actual or perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability to the federal definition, >>and dropped the prerequisite that the victim be engaging in a federally protected activity.<< Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have statutes criminalizing various types of hate crimes. Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia have statutes creating a civil cause of action in addition to the criminal penalty for similar acts. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia have statutes requiring the state to collect hate crime statistics".
    1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971. 1
  5972. 1
  5973. 1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. Socialists and communists are all the same. In the Venezuelan's case, they waited for capitalists to build their oil infrastructure, before they stole it (nationalization), thinking that it would always support them, and would not invest in anything else, as that would be capitalism to do so. Of course, the countries who had stock in their oil industry was going to drop them over their theft. Socialists are thieves, nothing more. They can't stand the fact that capitalists, who have the money, are needed for capital, which is invested in a business venture, who hire the people, to turn a profit. Without capitalism, and money available for capital expenditures, you can not expand. Marxism, Socialism, Communism, and Progressivism have never worked, and never will. It is nothing but rebranded serfdom, where nobody (the Proletariat) can advance, because the Bourgeoisie (the middle-class capitalist small business owners), are gone, and those with the wealth run the government and industry, and they will not allow anyone they do not want to succeed, or become one of them. Take a look at what the jealous Bolsheviks did to the Russian farmers who owned property for the first time, and were turning a small profit. They claimed the farmers stole the land, so the bolsheviks stole their money, before they murdered everyone in the village. Socialists are that way, jealous of those who have more, because they're too lazy to work for it, and think that those who have money somehow owe it to them, without having to lift a finger to work for it. It can be said to be a Robin Hood syndrome.
    1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. 1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. 1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. The Clinton campaign is founded on red communism. The Communist Party USA is backing Hillary for 2016. Think not? Read below: From the Washington Times: "Where are the reports about how Communists — real, live, unrepentant, Marxist-Leninist, card-carrying Communists — see support for, and the election of, Hillary Clinton as the next step in their path to power in America?" http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/11/journalisms-double-standard-covering-hillary-clint/ From the Observer: "The Communist Party of the United States (“a vestigial branch of one of the greatest tyrannies in human history”) has also endorsed Hillary." http://observer.com/2016/08/a-history-lesson-for-howard-kurtz-campaign-credo-was-lost-long-ago/ From the Communist Party USA: "We have to continue to emphasize the issues, promoting the best of both Sanders and Clinton." http://www.cpusa.org/article/taking-a-sober-look-at-the-2016-election/ By the way, the birth certificate that Obama had the gall to post on a US Government website, was a forgery, making it fraud. Not only did I take it apart, layer by layer, using Photoshop, but many others did too, including several police departments. I would swear an oath on that, in court, and give testimony on it. Last, now, she has been caught in debit and credit fraud, overcharging donors on their bank accounts. This is wire fraud. Exclusive: Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors http://observer.com/2016/09/exclusive-hillary-clinton-campaign-systematically-overcharging-poorest-donors/
    1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006. 1
  6007. 1
  6008. 1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016. 1
  6017. 1
  6018. 1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024. 1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. There was a lot of truth spoken here, whether we conservatives wish to hear it or not, and most don't because they do not understand the politics of the Middle-East (Western Asia and Egypt in North Africa). Why Fox will not explain this, I have no idea. In the Middle-East, the counties politics are separate from their religion and sharia law. The northern countries are socialist/communist in their politics, and the south, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan are not. That is what Afghanistan and Iraq was really all about, the political control within those countries. In Iraq, it was the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party - Iraq Region (that of Saddam), which happens to be the same party that was installed in Syria, by an Iraqi led coup, under Assad's father. In Iran, after the Shah did his runner, it came under Russian control with the Ayatollah. Next, was Russia's invasion into Afghanistan, which borders Pakistan, during Carter. In Syria, Assad's political party is the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region. It is part of a political front, known as the National Progressive Front. The National Progressive Front consists of: Syrian Regional Branch of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party Arab Socialist Movement Arab Socialist Union Syrian Communist Party (Khalid Bakdash faction) Syrian Communist Party (Yusuf Faisal faction) Social Democratic Unionists Socialist Unionists Democratic Socialist Unionist Party Arabic Democratic Unionist Party National Vow Movement Read from the links below, and you will understand what the US is trying to stop the spread of. It is stopping the spread of Marxism/Communism into southern Asia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Progressive_Front_(Syria) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Socialist_Ba%27ath_Party_%E2%80%93_Syria_Region https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%27ath_Party Separate the Muslim's religion and law from their politics, as they are completely different beasts. The radical Muslims are within and from these Marxist/Communist groups. They have been since the end of WWII. Yes, Putin did lie to Trump, and I'm sure Trump misled Putin about the US. That happens all the time, and has since this country was founded. What is going on now, is from a policy that was started under Eisenhower, after WWII, to stop the spread of communism, and to keep control of the resources in southern Asia.
    1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041. 1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047. 1
  6048. 1
  6049. 1
  6050. 1
  6051. 1
  6052. Noneshere He also pardoned several Wall Street crooks, and one in particular was Marc Rich, who made illegal oil deals with Iran during the Iran Hostage Crisis. There was also Almon Glenn Braswell, convicted of mail fraud and perjury, and was tied to Hillary's brother. He defrauded many elderly citizens of millions. Let's not mention the trail of women that Clinton had affairs with; one now has a BJ named after her. I agree that Bill Clinton is as far from being a gentleman as they come. Some of the Pardons: Peter MacDonald had been sentenced to 14 years at a Federal Prison in Texas for fraud, extortion, inciting riots, bribery, and corruption stemming from the Navajo purchase of the Big Boquillas Ranch in Northwestern Arizona. On the day before President Clinton left office, U.S. Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy lobbied the White House to commute the sentence of the former leader of the Navajo Nation. MacDonald's sentence was commuted after he served 10 years. Carlos Vignali had his sentence for cocaine trafficking commuted, after serving 6 of 15 years in federal prison. Almon Glenn Braswell was pardoned of his 1983 mail fraud and perjury convictions. In 1998 he was under federal investigation for money laundering and tax evasion charges. Braswell and Carlos Vignali each paid approximately $200,000 to Hillary Clinton's brother, Hugh Rodham, to represent their respective cases for clemency. Hugh Rodham returned the payments after they were disclosed to the public. Braswell would later invoke the Fifth Amendment at a Senate Committee hearing in 2001, when questioned about allegations of his having systematically defrauded senior citizens of millions of dollars. Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg, members of the radical Weather Underground organization, both had sentences for weapons and explosives charges commuted: Evans served 16 years of her 40-year sentence, and Rosenberg served 16 of her 58 years. [The Clintons claim to be against the 2nd amendment, but they did this]. Marc Rich, a fugitive who had fled the U.S. during his prosecution, was residing in Switzerland. Rich owed $48 million in taxes and was charged with 51 counts of tax fraud, was pardoned of tax evasion. He was required to pay a $1 million fine and waive any use of the pardon as a defense against any future civil charges that were filed against him in the same case. Critics complained that Denise Eisenberg Rich, his former wife, had made substantial donations to both the Clinton library and to Mrs. Clinton's senate campaign. According to Paul Volcker's independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels (640,000 m3) of oil. Longtime Clinton supporters and Democratic leaders such as former President Jimmy Carter, James Carville and Terry McAuliffe, were all critical of the Clinton pardon. Carter said the pardons were "disgraceful." Susan McDougal, who had already completed her sentence, was pardoned for her role in the Whitewater scandal. McDougal had served the maximum possible 18 months, including eight in solitary confinement, on contempt charges for refusing to testify about Clinton's role. Dan Rostenkowski, a former Democratic Congressman from Illinois and Chairman of House Ways and Means Committee, was pardoned for his role in the Congressional Post Office scandal. Rostenkowski had served 13 months of a 17-month sentence before being released in 1997. After his release from prison, Clinton granted him a pardon in December 2000. Mel Reynolds, a Democratic Congressman from Illinois, was convicted of bank fraud, 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice, and solicitation of child pornography. His sentence was commuted on the bank fraud charge and he was allowed to serve the final months under the auspices of a halfway house. Reynolds had served his entire sentence on child sex abuse charges before the commutation of the later convictions. Patty Hearst, who was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army in 1974. After being isolated and threatened with death, she became supportive of their cause, making propaganda announcements for them and taking part in illegal activities. After her arrest in 1975, she was found guilty of bank robbery. Her conviction and long prison sentence were widely seen as unjust, but the procedural correctness of her trial was upheld by the courts. Hearst's sentence was commuted by President Jimmy Carter, and she was pardoned by President Bill Clinton. Roger Clinton, the president's half-brother, was pardoned for drug charges after having served the entire sentence more than a decade earlier. Roger Clinton would be charged with drunk driving and disorderly conduct in an unrelated incident within a year of the pardon. He was also briefly alleged to have been utilized in lobbying for the Braswell pardon, among others. However, no wrongdoing was uncovered. Harvey Weinig, a former Manhattan lawyer who was sentenced in 1996 to 11 years in prison for facilitating an extortion-kidnapping scheme and helping launder at least $19 million for the Cali cocaine cartel.
    1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061. 1
  6062. 1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. 1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. 1
  6095. This is what the left-wing professors, who Bill Ayers et al taught, depend on. The student snowflakes have no idea that they are sitting in a thought reform program, when they are taught cultural Marxism/socialism, such as capitalism is bad, nationalize all industry, cops are pigs, tax the rich, make the rich pay, demand social programs such as welfare and medicine, be anarchists, protest, riot, free speech is bad, gun rights are bad, religion is bad, postmodernism is good, social justice, black studies, LGBT studies, Hispanic studies, and that Marx, Engels, Marcuse, and Adorno are our savior; they're just misunderstood. They're being taught radical communism, and are too blind to see it, because they believe that a university has all the answers, and that a professor would never lie to them. They refuse to listen to anyone from the right lecture, including other professors, mainly because their left-wing professors have threatened them with their grades. They ask for everything, even though our GDP is lower than our national debt. Who will pay for it? Margaret Thatcher, on Feb. 5, 1976, in a TV interview for Thames TV This Week, said, "...and Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They [socialists] always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them." Prof. Mary Grabar, Ph.D., English, University of Georgia in 2002: "Bill Ayers likens a traditional school to prison because it requires students adhere to dress codes, schedules, and rules of discipline. But he has had captive audiences and has used his power as a professor to indoctrinate future teachers. His education philosophy is based on anarchism, progressivism, and Marxism. It’s all about radicalizing children in social justice lessons, and making them see themselves as victims of an evil capitalistic system." "I want to show that although Ayers was a failed bomber, he was successful in helping to transform and destroy education. And he did it at taxpayers’ expense. He has trained hundreds of teachers. He worked closely with Obama and [U.S. Secretary of Education] Arne Duncan in Chicago in funding programs aimed at radicalizing students. One of his closest colleagues, Linda Darling-Hammond, was on Obama’s education transition team, and was in charge of developing one of the two Common Core tests. And Bill Ayers has appeared at conferences with Duncan and other officials in organizations that devised Common Core." "What Bill Ayers would have in the classroom extends the 1960s agenda of smashing monogamy, ending the bourgeois family and its values, destroying the work ethic, [and] patriotism. So what we have is kids indoctrinated with lessons about the police—the 1960s narrative about the “pigs”—fatherless, rootless, joining gangs, and looting in the streets. It’s a Marxist’s dream come true. Those like Bill Ayers don’t have to do the dangerous work of setting bombs any more. They can watch the Crips and the Bloods unite against the police, as we’ve been seeing on the streets of Baltimore. They can watch from the comfort of their homes in nice gentrified neighborhoods, as they collect retirement checks and honoraria for speaking gigs."
    1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. Below, I quote Elaine Pagels, PhD, from her book, “The Origin of Satan,” 1995: "In biblical sources, the Hebrew term, “the satan” [ha-satan], describes an adversarial role. It is not the name of a particular character. Although Hebrew storytellers, as early as the sixth century B.C.E., occasionally introduced a supernatural character, whom they called “the satan”; what they meant, was any one of the angels sent by God, for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity." Pagels PhD in religion is from Harvard, and she teaches it at Princeton. Next, I quote Rabbi Tovia Singer, on the subject of satan: "Although this well-known Christian doctrine has much in common with the pagan Zoroastrian Persian dualism from which it spawned, it is completely alien to the teachings of the Jewish Scriptures. In fact, this Christian notion that [the] Satan, in an act of outright defiance, ceased to function as God had intended him to, suggests that God created something imperfect or defective". In Job, it is written as the satan, (ha-satan), it was not the name of the angel, but his temporary job title, to obstruct Job, and play an adversary. The angel's name is unknown. That is why Jesus called Peter a satan and a stumbling block over an argument. Next, I quote Rabbi Dr. Raymond Apple: "The word Satan figures in the Hebrew Bible, but not as a proper name. As a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. It is sometimes used in a human sense; in Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. "It does not begin to have a superhuman sense until late in the Biblical period; in Zechariah 3 and the Book of Job it is applied to the prosecutor in the heavenly court. But even in this sense, Satan is not a demon. At best, he is one of the celestial beings, but it may be that the word is merely a colorful metaphor and does not imply that there is any actual being with that name. Nor is Satan opposed to God. At worst, he is simply a devil’s advocate drawing God’s attention to things that appear to be wrong. "Kaufmann Kohler’s theory, in his “Jewish Theology”, chapter 31, is that just as the serpent in the creation story “represents the evil inclination which arises in man with his first consciousness of freedom”, so Satan is an allegorical [fictional] figure “representing the evil of the world, both physical and moral”. "In post-Biblical Jewish sources there are very few references to Satan, and those that are found have no dogmatic or authoritative significance. Satan continues to represent the impersonal force of evil; thus, the Tosefta Shabbat advises that one should “not go on a journey with a wicked man, because Satan accompanies him”. In Jewish liturgy the few references to Satan are all impersonal, for instance the evening prayer that God may remove the adversary “from before us and behind us”, and the morning prayer for protection from “the destroying adversary”. "Popular lore has a far stronger notion of Satan deriving from the New Testament. There he not only personifies the spirit of evil but assumes an independent personality hostile to Jesus and to God. As a result, Milton, writing in an age when people regarded Satan as the presiding demon in stark opposition to God, was able, at least in the first two or three books of “Paradise Lost”, to draw a sympathetic picture of Satan and turn him into almost an epic hero. "For Judaism, all this goes much too far." Also, from Dr. Helen Bond: "There's no kind of prince of darkness; somebody who stands in opposites to God. Throughout most of the texts, there's no concept at all of an evil force." Dr. Helen Bond, MTheol PhD, Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland. Quote from "The History Of The Devil".
    1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute. There were several Mary's, and the Catholics are who started to degrade Mary Magdalene. It's funny that ABC would continue the lie, when several scholars have shown that she was not a prostitute, which was another Mary. From Wikipedia on Mary of Bethany:  "Medieval Western Christianity identified Mary of Bethany with Mary Magdalene and with the sinful woman of Luke 7:36–50. This influenced the Roman Rite liturgy of the feast of Mary Magdalene, with a Gospel reading about the sinful woman and a collect referring to Mary of Bethany. Since the 1969 revision of that liturgy, Mary Magdalene's feast day continues to be on 22 July, but Mary of Bethany is celebrated, together with her brother Lazarus, on 29 July, the memorial of their sister Martha.[2] In Eastern Christianity and some Protestant traditions, Mary of Bethany and Mary Magdalene have always been considered separate persons.[3] The Orthodox Church has its own traditions regarding Mary of Bethany's life beyond the gospel accounts.Medieval Western Christianity identified Mary of Bethany with Mary Magdalene and with the sinful woman of Luke 7:36–50".  Wikipedia on Mary Magdalene: "It is almost universally agreed today that characterizations of Mary Magdalene in Western Christianity as a repentant prostitute or loose woman are unfounded,[3][5][8] arising from conflating or merging her identity with the unnamed sinner who anoints Jesus' feet in Luke 7:36-50.[5] The figures of Mary Magdalene, the anointing sinner of Luke, and Mary of Bethany, who in John 11:1-2 also anoints Jesus' feet, were long regarded as the same person. Though Mary Magdalene is named in each of the four gospels in the New Testament, none of the clear references to her indicate that she was a prostitute or notable for a sinful way of life,[3][8] nor link her with Mary of Bethany. Modern scholarship has restored the understanding of Mary of Magdala as an important early Christian leader.[16][17]"
    1
  6130. 1
  6131. 1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. TGH622: I think that if you dig into it, you will find that those wearing the swastika and helmets, in the US, were paid by the same people as AntiFa was. The entire Charlottesville incident was staged. The way the Neo-Gramscians did it, was to first have BLM or AntiFa start a protest about Civil War monuments, to create the problem or "struggle" in the news. Next, they hire the opposing group. They publicly announce when they'll meet, and stage the entire thing. When you see the ACLU backing so-called white supremacists in a court, you know that it is definitely a fraud. Richard Spencer did it, to make money, and get his mug on the news. The guy claiming to be a nationalist, was involved with Obama last year. The left did this, to try to tie Nazism to the Republican Party. The problem, is that everyone in the US, who knows their history, knows that the hate groups have always been from the left, including the neo-Nazis, as many of them also belong to the KKK too. There is now much evidence, that it was staged, and that the Neo-Gramscians hired the entire lot. There's a blog article at Berkeley, which explains how they were against both Trump and Hillary. They are pushing socialism on the kids, and were behind Bernie Sanders. The article is about how they can use Gramsci's techniques against the government, which they consider neo-liberal. The social professors, and some in our government, consider themselves Neo-Gramscians, as do their groups that they've started, with backing from some mighty rich socialists, and the Communist Party USA. The same caliber of people, who were behind the 60s-70s protests, are behind this now. http://www.berkeleyreviewofeducation.com/cfc2016-blog/the-role-of-organic-intellectuals-in-the-era-of-a-trump-presidency
    1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. Dr. Mary Grabar, Ph.D., English, from the University of Georgia in 2002, about what has taken place in both primary and secondary education: "Bill Ayers likens a traditional school to prison because it requires students adhere to dress codes, schedules, and rules of discipline. But he has had captive audiences and has used his power as a professor to indoctrinate future teachers. His education philosophy is based on anarchism, progressivism, and Marxism. It’s all about radicalizing children in social justice lessons, and making them see themselves as victims of an evil capitalistic system. "I want to show that although Ayers was a failed bomber, he was successful in helping to transform and destroy education. And he did it at taxpayers’ expense. He has trained hundreds of teachers. He worked closely with Obama and [U.S. Secretary of Education] Arne Duncan in Chicago in funding programs aimed at radicalizing students. One of his closest colleagues, Linda Darling-Hammond, was on Obama’s education transition team, and was in charge of developing one of the two Common Core tests. And Bill Ayers has appeared at conferences with Duncan and other officials in organizations that devised Common Core. "What Bill Ayers would have in the classroom extends the 1960s agenda of smashing monogamy, ending the bourgeois family and its values, destroying the work ethic, [and] patriotism. So what we have is kids indoctrinated with lessons about the police—the 1960s narrative about the “pigs”—fatherless, rootless, joining gangs, and looting in the streets. It’s a Marxist’s dream come true. Those like Bill Ayers don’t have to do the dangerous work of setting bombs any more. They can watch the Crips and the Bloods unite against the police, as we’ve been seeing on the streets of Baltimore. They can watch from the comfort of their homes in nice gentrified neighborhoods, as they collect retirement checks and honoraria for speaking gigs." [sic]
    1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151. 1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. Yup, that is the typical liberal crackpot, Madonna, which shows them to be the scum that they truly are. These protesters are lowbrowed, knuckle dragging, ill-raised, ill-educated, mouth breathing, guttersnipe tramps, who always resort to vulgarity and blackguard, when they are proven to be incorrect, along with being liars of the worst sort. Let's see who else these feminists had speaking at their rally. Why, it was Angela Davis, who ran as the VP candidate with Guss Hall for the Communist Party USA ticket in 1980 and 1984. That is who is filling these women's heads with Marxism, and teaching them to be radical activists who disregard the law. Angela Davis speaking at the rally: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265554/millennials-guide-angela-davis-and-other-lloyd-billingsley Then, we have Jane Fonda agitating the pipeline protest, when Trump stated that he wanted to work with the Indian nation, to safely run the pipeline. Yes, Hanoi Jane, who went to North Vietnam, and sat with a group of communist soldiers for a photo-op, and decried what a bad place the US was, and what good people the North Vietnamese were, while US soldiers were being killed. You see folks, the Communist Party USA still exists today. They quit running candidates, when they threw their full support behind two new candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Look it up, as the communists supported their campaigns on the Communist Party USA's website. The Nation magazine is another who fully supported both, and they are as far left wing as a magazine can be. They publish stories by every communist in the US, such as Bill Ayers and others. Let's not forget the inauguration day protesters. Those who were caught burning newspaper stands and trash in the DC streets, dressed in all black, who were interviewed. They proclaimed themselves to be Marxists and communists, with one waving a red flag with the hammer and sickle on it. They also stated that they were from DisruptJ20! That is who these people are.
    1
  6156. 1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. I used to have some respect for Trumka, because of what he made of himself, until he threw his hat in with John Sweeney, then I watched what he has become. Look into Sweeney, and you'll find someone who rubbed shoulders with Marxist-Communist radicals, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, and took on their ideology. Quote from WND: Sweeney is a socialist activist and a card-carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA, the principal American affiliate of the Socialist International. The DSA has demonstrated a close relationship with Obama over the years. Sweeney is a member of the DSA’s Boston chapter. He served as president of AFL-CIO from 1995 until his retirement last September. He previously served for four terms as president of the controversial Service Employees International Union, or SEIU. During his administration, Sweeney famously aligned the SEIU with ACORN and other leftist groups. Activist and author Joel Kotkin, a fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute, observed how Sweeney brought communists into his union leadership. “The public-sector unions have pushed the entire labor movement to the left,” he said. “The [SEIU] has embraced organizations with a New Left origin, such as ACORN and Cleveland’s Nine to Five, and has even set up its own gay and lesbian caucus. … The rise of these unions led to the elevation of SEIU’s boss, John Sweeney, to head of the labor federation. “No George Meaney-style bread-and-butter unionist, Sweeney is an advocate of European-style democratic socialism,” said Kotkin. “He has opened the AFL-CIO to participation by delegates openly linked to the Communist Party, which enthusiastically backed his ascent. The U.S. Communist Party [CPUSA] says it is now ‘in complete accord’ with the AFL-CIO’s program. ‘The radical shift in both leadership and policy is a very positive, even historic change,’ wrote CPUSA National Chairman Gus Hall in 1996 after the AFL-CIO convention.” Upon assuming the office of the AFL-CIO in 1995, Sweeney was quick to rescind one of the union’s founding rules that banned Communist Party members and loyalists from leadership positions within the federation and its unions. Sweeney welcomed Communist Party delegates to positions of power in his federation. Linda Chavez and Daniel Gray, in their book “Betrayal: How union bosses shake down their bosses and corporate America,” state Sweeney placed a number of DSA allies in his union office. The DSA’s official website carries an endorsement from Sweeney: “I’m proud to a member of a movement for change that puts the cause of working people at the heart of the matter.” With research by Brenda J. Elliott Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2011/02/267317/
    1
  6170. ***** Oh, it wouldn't take them long, as to them, she is an infidel or worse. Though other religions are guilty of brainwashing a child from birth, Islam teaches them hate for those who are not like them, and that is the huge difference. They also teach them to not want or use any technology from the time of Muhammad, but they defy that at many places. What a double standard. What the Muslims think about the west, is that everyone are heretics, but the west does not make it mandatory for one to attend a church or have a state religion. However, when they did have a state religion, it was Christianity, which did not teach a child to hate others nor to kill them, because of their religion. Islam indoctrinates the young into thinking that everyone but another Muslim is beneath them, like an animal, and it is okay to kill them, thus we have 12 year old children running around with RPGs and bombs. This became much worse after the Ayatollah Sayyid Khomeini came into power in Iran. Now, we have the last Ayatollah about to get his hands on a nuclear weapon, if he hasn't already. I stated it then, that it was a bad mistake to allow the Ayatollah to live, but Carter supposedly signed a bill that disallowed assassination. Then again, we should not have put the Shah into power. The one before him was going to nationalize (steal) the oil wells and refineries that other countries built there, but they did it anyhow with the Ayatollah. That is what brought all of this about, the oil wells and the refineries. However, the Muslims allowed the drilling and those refineries to be built on good faith, then nationalized (stole) them, and succeeded. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (BP) and Standard Oil should have knew who they were dealing with; a band of backward desert cutthroat thieves. Muslims stone thieves, or cut off their hands, so Islam has a double standard. All the west did, was to give them a means to great wealth, whereby the Muslims used that to attack the west's so-called heretics, after they stole everything back that helped them. They think nothing of the ancient laws: thou shalt not steal, and thou shall not kill (murder).
    1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173. 1
  6174. 1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177. I've heard and read a lot of crackpot theories behind communist countries failing (It's the Jews, etc), and many don't understand how many communist countries there are, but Styx is correct, in that it isn't capitalism at the root of their failure, it's their communist politics and economics. People may not know this, but it was the Communist Party USA who was behind Occupy Wall Street, and they take full credit for that sit in and rioting. They are within the Democratic Party like a bad syphilis infection. If you want a real eye-opener, look into Assad's political party in Syria, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. That party is part of a coalition of communist parties known as the National Progressive Front, which originates from the old Syrian Communist Party. Communism was banned until Assad lifted it in the 1986, and they crawled into bed with Russia. There are ten Communist Party factions within the NPF. Iraq and Iran have the same party within, as do several other states in the Middle-East. Did you ever notice how Kim started firing his missiles off after we went to Turkey, and advanced into northern Syria? It wasn't just over war games in South Korea. From what I've read, the Communists still control about 1/2 the Duma in Russia. Now, you know why Tulsi Gabbard went to Syria, and why she is now spewing vitriol about Trump. That is why Obama, Clinton, and many others in the Democratic Party, are very friendly with Syria and others in the Middle East. That is why Clinton and Podesta have big ties to Russia.
    1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. Robert knew who killed his brother. After it happened, he was heard saying "they killed him," but who were they? The killers were from the Chicago mafia, the breeding grounds of communism, and they were under orders from the Democratic Party, along with several who JFK had just fired. They found out that the Kennedy's would not go along with the communists who were running things in the DNC out of Chicago and the ones in the unions, so they had him killed off, and installed their puppet, Lyndon Johnson, who they had criminal blackmail info on. Johnson brought in the first sweep of socialism, to buy the minority votes, and every Democratic president after that added their part, along with two Neocons, the Bushes. The last two Democrat presidents were groomed by the party from a young age, and were people who they could also control with blackmail. They took out Nixon by impeachment, and tried to kill Reagan, because he was set on destroying communism. They had fought back, just as Trump is now. This goes back to the 1944 election, which would have been FDR and Henry Wallace. Many think that Wallace had converted to communism, as several were known to have in the White House, such as the Treasury Sect. During the Democratic convention, they suddenly removed Wallace, and replaced him with Harry Truman for this reason. FDR didn't attend, and they said it was because of his ill health. Not long after the election, FDR died, and Truman became president. After the Venona Papers came out, they found out that the State Dept. was loaded with communists and spies, along with several in the White House under FDR. During the first term of Truman, according to FBI files, the California Communist Party took over the Progressive Party, which Wallace joined. During the 1948 election, the communists were controlling it, and Wallace ran against Truman under them, but lost. The Progressive Party disbanded, and their politicians joined the Democrats, where they slowly started to take it over. By the time that JFK was elected, they were in control of things, and several murders had taken place, which they laid to suicides. Some left the Democrats over their communist ties, and this may be one of the reasons for the Dixiecrats being formed, which they kept a lid on. There's two groups of socialists involved in the Democratic Party, yet today, and they are the Nazi sympathizers and the Communists. They are the ones who were deeply involved with the UN, and helping push for the EU. The Bush family are Neocons, and Nazi sympathizers, who helped finance Hitler, along with the Harriman family. Most of the bank executives financing the Nazis, in Harriman Brothers, were Skull & Bones members. The government seized the assets of their bank until WWII was over. It was Prescott Bush involved in it. You'll see where a few journalists and authors have tried to deny this, but a look at their backgrounds tells one that they're in on covering it up. They are biased stories. The point is, JFK and Robert's own political party had them killed.
    1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188. 1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191. 1
  6192. 1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. 1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. First, 700,000 people can not speak for large advanced populations, as they do not have any idea about what it takes to run advanced nations that large. Also, others within the population of 700,000, may not see things the way he does. It is easy to screen people for the talk they want presented. He even admits, that they are a "small, underdeveloped, country". [sic] Second, advanced civilizations, (not small, underdeveloped, countries), need enormous amounts of power. That does not leave many viable choices, as to how that power generation is achieved. The cheapest is still the fossil fuels, which are carbon based. Third, some protest, claiming that fossil fuels, (carbon), need to be ended. What they do not think about, is where will all those millions of people, that will become unemployed, find other work? Do these protesters not understand, about how many people are employed in extracting fossil fuel? There are many types of fuel, too, from coal, natural gas, and oil, all carbon products. We know that, even with today's technology, nuclear power generation is dangerous, as great failures have happened in the US, Russia, and Japan. I have lived through most all of them. Our technology, in today's nuclear control methods, is better, but there are still possibilities for a major disaster to take place. Plus, where do you put the waste? Last, power generation, by solar and wind power, does not create but a small percentage of supply as the others, nor can it, with the current methods. Hydropower is the best, but it can only be done, using certain bodies of water, and there are not many rivers left, that can take more dams. The final stumbling block, is the wealthy, who own those fossil fuel extraction and generating companies. They are not going to just quit, especially when there is still fuel available. Plus, there are the millions of employees, who will not stand for losing their jobs, when they have no other occupation, and have had that occupation for most of their lives, with many close to retirement. I do not blame those millions of employees one bit. Just something for the carbon protesters to think about.
    1
  6204. 1
  6205. Elias Styner Well of course, that how it should be, and it will have to be. However, you have the fringe lunatics, that are picketing and demanding things to be done now, and they seem to not understand, nor care, what that would would do, if those carbons were suddenly outlawed, as they want. They also have no idea about what to replace it with, as nuclear power is not safe, yet, nor what we intend on doing with the nuclear waste. I'll bet that you sure don't want it underground around you, the same as I. I live in the Ohio River Valley, and we have a high cancer rate, where several river counties, in several states, received a high concentration of the nuclear testing fallout from the 40's through the last above ground tests. We actually got it as bad as those who lived in Utah, believe it or not. What they didn't get, it stayed skyward, until it made it here. It's a sorry sight, when you see the lunatic fringe, (Sierra Club, Greenpeace, etc), demand the sudden halt to these very things, especially when you have certain people, running for president, threatening these very millions of employees, along with those very industries, and promising to have the EPA pass many new stringent rules, just because of a few votes. They don't seem to care, at all, that those new rules will cost the end user, who is supplied power, natural gas, gasoline, plastics, petrochemicals, rubber, medicine, or asphalt for state highway projects (paid with our tax money), etc., nor how it well harm the people in other ways. The cost will go up on pretty much everything.
    1
  6206. 1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216. 1
  6217. 1
  6218. marko a. a. khatwah; I'll guarantee you, that when Styx was in college, he learned this very thing. The myth of Satan controlling the underworld is Greco-Roman. It did not originate in Judaism, though the Essenes did start to believe in it, after the Persians controlled the Levant before the Romans, which was behind the ideology of Enoch. The Greek God, Hades, or the Greco-Roman's Pluton (Pluto), became Satan. This ideology also came from the Persians, via Zoroastrianism, after Alexander the Great conquered the Levant from the Persians. The look of Satan was derived from Pan. It is very simple to look at both the Jewish and Catholic Encyclopedias to learn of the truth, along with several books written by theological scholars on the subject. Below, I quote Dr. Elaine Pagels, PhD, from her book, “The Origin of Satan,” 1995: "In biblical sources, the Hebrew term, “the satan” [ha-satan], describes an adversarial role. It is not the name of a particular character. Although Hebrew storytellers, as early as the sixth century B.C.E., occasionally introduced a supernatural character, whom they called “the satan”; what they meant, was any one of the angels sent by God, for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity." Pagels PhD in religion (Christianity) is from Harvard, and she teaches it at Princeton. Next, I quote Rabbi Tovia Singer, on the subject of satan: "Although this well-known Christian doctrine has much in common with the pagan Zoroastrian Persian dualism from which it spawned, it is completely alien to the teachings of the Jewish Scriptures. In fact, this Christian notion that [the or a] Satan, in an act of outright defiance, ceased to function as God had intended him to, suggests that God created something imperfect or defective". Next, I quote Rabbi Dr. Raymond Apple: "The word Satan figures in the Hebrew Bible, but not as a proper name. As a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. It is sometimes used in a human sense; in Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. "It does not begin to have a superhuman sense until late in the Biblical period; in Zechariah 3 and the Book of Job it is applied to the prosecutor in the heavenly court. But even in this sense, Satan is not a demon. At best, he is one of the celestial beings, but it may be that the word is merely a colorful metaphor and does not imply that there is any actual being with that name. Nor is Satan opposed to God. At worst, he is simply a devil’s advocate drawing God’s attention to things that appear to be wrong. "Kaufmann Kohler’s theory, in his “Jewish Theology”, chapter 31, is that just as the serpent in the creation story “represents the evil inclination which arises in man with his first consciousness of freedom”, so Satan is an allegorical [fictional] figure “representing the evil of the world, both physical and moral”. "In post-Biblical Jewish sources there are very few references to Satan, and those that are found have no dogmatic or authoritative significance. Satan continues to represent the impersonal force of evil; thus, the Tosefta Shabbat advises that one should “not go on a journey with a wicked man, because Satan accompanies him”. In Jewish liturgy the few references to Satan are all impersonal, for instance the evening prayer that God may remove the adversary “from before us and behind us”, and the morning prayer for protection from “the destroying adversary”. "Popular lore has a far stronger notion of Satan deriving from the New Testament. There he not only personifies the spirit of evil but assumes an independent personality hostile to Jesus and to God. As a result, Milton, writing in an age when people regarded Satan as the presiding demon in stark opposition to God, was able, at least in the first two or three books of “Paradise Lost”, to draw a sympathetic picture of Satan and turn him into almost an epic hero. "For Judaism, all this goes much too far." Also, from Dr. Helen Bond: "There's no kind of prince of darkness; somebody who stands in opposites to God. Throughout most of the texts, there's no concept at all of an evil force" Dr. Helen Bond, MTheol PhD, Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland. Quote from "The History Of The Devil." Last, from Gerald Messandé, in his book, "A History of the Devil": “The framework of the three monotheisms [Essene Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] had been erected. The Devil’s birth certificate was filled out by an Iranian prophet.” Thus, there is no invisible devil who makes man sin (break the ancient laws), it is mans own mind, where man becomes a satan (an adversary to others).
    1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235. 1
  6236. 1
  6237. 1
  6238. 1
  6239. 1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242. 1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. This is why the hard science departments, such as physics, engineering, and architecture, etc, laugh behind the backs of the soft science professors such as those in sociology, anthropology, Egyptology, and archeology, who have only very limited proof of anything, and provide only speculative theory. There are many scientific papers that show the claims about Darwinism to be false, actually as many false as true. Their claims about ancient architecture and the building of the pyramids, etc, produce some of the biggest laughs in hard science. Sociology refuses to veer away from their Darwinian paradigm, even when proven false, and the mounting evidence that proves their ignorance is discarded as anomalies. Two studies were released, which show that anthropology's claim that man originated from Chimpanzees, (which they claim have 99% identical DNA to humans), is false, when you add in the faults that they leave out. The real percentage of like DNA is around 93-95%, which is a very huge difference. Other studies prove that their claim of our chromosome number being different over it breaking and rejoining is false. It was a telomere to telomere fusion, which means that a piece of broken DNA, (broken in the middle), and magically reattaching itself is an impossibility. Another DNA study shows that the DNA clock dating method is highly inaccurate, just as is radiocarbon (C-14) dating of anything over 20.000 years. You will never hear about this, unless you do some digging to find it, but it is there. A new study shows that the land bridge theory, which shows people migrating across the Bering Strait, could not have happened as claimed. It shows that no human could have survived the trip over the ice, with the amount of ice that was known to exist. Another study shows that Cro-Magnon man has been around much longer than claimed, and it showed that they had cross bred with the Neanderthal in Europe, way before they claim. The cross breeding was not Neanderthal to Cro-Magnon but vice versa. Last, the elongated skull people of Peru, who had the two skull plates, have DNA that lead back to the Middle-East and Europe. They now have evidence that they were born with larger brains and elongated skulls, as a seven month stillborn child was found mummified, with an elongated skull, in Bolivia, just across the Peruvian border at Lake Titicaca. I think another was also unearthed. You will not hear of this from the anthropologists.
    1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. 1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. Jason G The legality is that they arrested and searched the man, after finding out he had a warrant on him, not before. If the LEO had searched him before finding the warrant, it would have been thrown out. Law Enforcement has always questioned suspects, without making an arrest, even without ones rights being read, as what is said is inadmissible in court, but they can still ask one questions. In my opinion, the officer had cause to question him, because he came out of a house, that had been reported earlier, as having illegal drug activity taking place inside, and the officer was on a stakeout of that home. He didn't arrest or search Strieff, until it was found that he had a warrant by running his name. A name and ID that Strieff willingly gave the LEO. He would have walked, had he not had a warrant out on him, and he could have refused to give the LEO an answer. Utah agreed that it would have been illegal to arrest the man for just stopping him for questioning. Strieff's attorney asked the court to suppress the narcotics evidence found, after they made an arrest on the outstanding warrant, and then did a search, not before. Strieff's attorney cited Terry v. Ohio, but in that case, a Cleveland LEO frisked a man, and found a gun, without making an arrest on an outstanding warrant, and just because he looked suspicious. Thus, it was against his 4th amendment rights. The two cases are totally different. NY Times: "The case, Utah v. Strieff, started when the police in Salt Lake City got an anonymous tip of drug activity at a house. An officer monitoring the house became suspicious at the number of people he saw entering and leaving. When one of those people, Edward Strieff, left to walk to a nearby convenience store, the officer stopped him and asked for his identification. A routine check revealed that Mr. Strieff had an outstanding “small traffic warrant.” The officer arrested him based on that earlier warrant, searched him and found drugs in his pockets. The State of Utah agreed that the initial stop was illegal, because it was not based on reasonable, individual suspicion that Mr. Strieff was doing anything wrong. Instead, the state argued that the discovery of the valid warrant — after the illegal stop — got around the Fourth amendment violation." Here, the media is quoting Justice Sotomayor's opinions, and not that of all the Justices. She wished to throw out everything, because a LEO stopped the man to question him, even though he was arrested and searched over finding an outstanding warrant. The LEO had no intention of arresting the man over the stop, until he saw that there was a warrant against the man. If he had arrested the man, just over the stop, it would have been illegal. Decision: "Holding: When there was no flagrant police misconduct and a police officer discovered a valid, pre-existing, and untainted warrant for an individual’s arrest, evidence seized pursuant to that arrest is admissible even when the police officer’s stop of the individual was unconstitutional, because the discovery of the warrant attenuated the connection between the stop and the evidence." http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/utah-v-strieff/ http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/argument-preview-utah-v-strieff-and-the-future-of-the-exclusionary-rule/ http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/opinion/another-hit-to-the-fourth-amendment.html
    1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. Jim Shaw is a doosy. He saw others making money even back then, by writing fictitious ramblings and using religion as a cover, so he figured he would quit the Freemasons, and then declare he had been a 33rd, and claim that he had been a past master, which was, in fact, a lie, but the book made him some cash. Now, others quote from this as fact, knowing it has been debunked by Art deHoyos and S. Brent Morris, who did a thorough investigation on him. Jack Harris was debunked too, and again, he was after book money. He saw the gravy train that the simple minded would pay out to read any lie and believe it. He is like Schnoebelen, in that he can never get his dates straight. I think Schnoebelen got his ideas partly from Harris. Alex Jones is nothing but an opportunist, who is on the gravy train too, and does not care how many lies he tells, nor does he care who he allows to speak, claiming truth, even though one lie after another, leaves the ones he's interviewing, mouthes. Of course hes into UFO's and all other paranormal stuff too. Hmm, sounds like Schnoebelen. David Icke, I believe, is either certifiably nuts, or is on heavy medication. Though, he is on the gravy train, and getting paid handsomely by the simpletons following him around. He and Jones probably hit it off real well. Then we have Rabi Bill Schnoebelen, ex-Catholic, ex-Mormon, ex-Satanist, ex-Mason, ex-vampire, and preaches to his congregation that werewolves and vampires are real. I wonder how many of these simpletons, who listen to these folks, have ever did a background check on them? I think I'll help them out. Jim Shaw: http://www.masonicinfo.com/shaw.htm Jack Harris: http://www.masonicinfo.com/harris.htm Alex Jones (Yes, he is this idiotic): http://rt.com/usa/alex-jones-breivik-masons/ David Icke: http://www.masonicinfo.com/icke.htm Bill Schnoebelen: http://www.masonicinfo.com/schnoebelen.htm And, look here too: http://www.masonicinfo.com/people.htm
    1
  6293. 1
  6294. 1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302. 1
  6303. 1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. 1
  6308. 1
  6309. 1
  6310. 1
  6311. 1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. Daniel Allen Because he did step in, and help the AASR during it's early days, along with donating a good bit of money. However, every Freemason knows that Pike did not speak for Freemasonry, as a whole, and never did, including Pike himself. If anyone would care to read the preface, to Morals and Dogma, the first edition, Pike says that if anything that he compiled, (over half was others work), does not set right with the reader, to ignore it. "Everyone is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound". Leo Taxil latched onto Pike taking a poke at the word lucifer, since Pike actually understood what the word really meant. However, Taxil claimed that Pike was the grand wizard of Satan worship at Charleston, over it, in his hoax against Freemasonry and the Catholic Church. Finally, after 12 years of this, Taxil made a public confession, before the clergy, in France, and did a runner. Now, and since then, the Catholic Church admits to being duped by Taxil, but many still quote and use his hoax. To paraphrase Pike, on the word lucifer, where he was poking fun at the Anglicans misunderstanding of the word, he said it was funny that lucifer was used to denote darkness, when it most assuredly meant light, and in fact, it does. The word, lucifer, means light or constellation, in Latin, which was a translation made by St. Jerome, in the Latin Vulgate. The Jews say the Hebrew word, that it describes, means morning star. Jesus was even called the morning star. The KJV Bible thumpers have had it wrong, since the reformation, even with Luther and Calvin, along with the Jews and Catholics, trying to tell them better. Even we Freemasons know better.
    1
  6354. 1
  6355. 1
  6356. Daniel Allen What got this started was a man by the name of Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès, who's pen name was Leo Taxil. Taxil was placed in a Jesuit seminary, at five years old, and by adulthood, despised the Catholic Church. He wrote several degrading books about the Catholics. Next, Taxil joined a lodge of Freemasonry, but was kicked out. Here, Taxil began to hate the fraternity just like the church. Finally, Taxil told the church that he had changed, and that he had information that Freemasonry was worshiping Satan. The church, and the Pope, ate this up, and financed his new books. These books are where the lie about Pike and Freemasonry bloomed. Taxil even went to the point of forging a letter on Pike. Last, Taxil had made it twelve years, taking advantage of the church, until a few bishops started to investigate his claims. When he saw that he was about to be caught, and before the church could cover up what he had done, he called a press conference, claiming to finally present a woman, who he said was giving him his information on Freemasonry. Instead of producing her, he told the press, and the assembled clergy, that it had all been a lie, and a hoax. He even quoted letters from the church, and poked fun at the religious leaders who sent them. After this, Taxil did a runner out a side door. Funny enough, many ministers, especially several TV evangelists, still quote Taxil, even though everyone has known of Taxil admitting to the hoax, and fraud, since the 1890's. Bill Schnoebelen, who now claims to be a Rabbi, claims he was a member of the Freemasonry Palladium, which Taxil admitted to being fake, and never existed. Of course, Bill claims to have been a 99 degree Mason, an ex-vampire, ex-catholic, ex-mormon, ex-satanist, and says that werewolves are real too.
    1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360. 1
  6361. 1
  6362. 1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365. 1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. For those who would like to know where the Eye of Providence and a pyramid comes from, please take a look at the links below. The eye can be found at the Vatican, and several Christian paintings from the 16th and earlier centuries. Eye of Providence at Aachen Cathedral: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Allsehendes_Auge_am_Tor_des_Aachener_Dom.JPG Eye of Providence in India: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eye_of_Providence_on_Altar_Equipment.JPG Supper at Emmaus, 1500's: http://www.srcs.nctu.edu.tw/joyceliu/mworks/mw-onlinecourse/course/0109/mannerism/Supper_at_Emmaus.jpg http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/art/emmaus.html Eye of God: http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/symbols/eye_of_god.htm Projections of the God in symbols of religion: http://www.kubarev.ru/en/content/392.htm Basilica Santa Maria: http://0.tqn.com/d/goitaly/1/S/-/7/-/-/basilica-santa-maria-pic.jpg Eye of Providence, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_Providence ============================== The Great Architect of the Universe comes from a Medieval Bible, a painting, and many Christians used it to describe God, at the time, who designed and built our universe. See the link below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Architect_of_the_Universe#/media/File:God_the_Geometer.jpg Page from French Bible Moralisee (c 1235-1245)" http://www.blavatskytrust.org.uk/html/articles/the%20right%20angle%20p2.htm http://longstreet.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83542d51e69e20120a6af8b43970c-pi The Great Architect of the Universe, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Architect_of_the_Universe
    1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374. 1
  6375. 1
  6376. Jennifer Loftus The oldest recorded flood tale, that of the Sumerians, say that it was only the Euphrates river that flooded, and that many people were drowned in the lowlands, over a 7 day rain. That Sumerian tale grew in size, twice more, to where it claimed an ark was built, that landed on a mountain in Mesopotamia, and not on Ararat, as the Jews claimed. The second tale of the three Mesopotamian tales, said that the boat landed on a small hill. With each retelling, it got embellished that much more, until the Jews really polished it up for a fourth retelling, claiming it rained 40 days and the water covered the earth, with Noah landing on Ararat. I imagine, with the rapid sea level rise over those years, when the icecap melted, that there was bad weather and flooding everywhere. Florida is 1/2 the size it once was, and Cuba and Haiti was connected into one island. The sea level rose about 350 feet over those years, with the rise starting at about 14,000 BCE, which leveled off around 8500 BCE. Tales of severe flooding, during that time, are from all over the world, as you state. In the Mesopotamian tales, the flood is said to either be the Euphrates river flooding, or it is guessed that it was when the Persian Gulf was created. If a Rabbi will state the truth, and some do, they will tell you that the Torah is all metaphorical. There's a lot of metaphor in the entire Tanakh. They combined many different tales of many different Gods into one, along with renaming heroes of other lands into Jewish names, and embellishing their tales. Noah and Moses were two examples. The link below is to a chart of the sea level rise. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png
    1
  6377. 1
  6378. 1
  6379. 1
  6380. 1
  6381. 1
  6382. 1
  6383. 1
  6384. 1
  6385. 1
  6386. 1
  6387. 1
  6388. 1
  6389. 1
  6390. 1
  6391. 1
  6392. 1
  6393. 1
  6394. 1
  6395. 1
  6396. 1
  6397. 1
  6398. 1
  6399. 1
  6400. 1
  6401. 1
  6402. 1
  6403. 1
  6404. 1
  6405. Richard Cohen is a socialist Jew, so I wouldn't put it past him to use the Hitler card. Cohen's a liar, and if you've read his writing, it is pure propaganda, and not fit for the sewer. I wonder what the conservative Jews think about his comments, as there are many? As a matter of fact, his comments are anti-Jewish, and if he practices his faith, he's a grievous sinner over that comment on top of it. Of course, what else can you expect, since his employer is the lying Washington Post, the most red communistic acting newspaper that has ever been written. This is from Wikipedia, and it was sourced, so it's accurate (I checked): "In 1998, Cohen was involved in a dispute with editorial aide Devon Spurgeon that was ultimately mediated by Washington Post management.[5] Cohen reportedly asked Spurgeon questions about "casual sex", told her to "stand up and turn around", and gave her the "silent treatment" for three weeks.[5] Cohen contended that "it was a personality dispute at an office, but it had nothing to do with sexual harassment as the term applies today".[5] "Post management concluded that Spurgeon had been subjected to a "hostile working environment" but not to "sexual harassment" and that Cohen was guilty of "inappropriate behavior"" The Washington Post has been known to be far left progressive liberal since the Nixon administration, and you notice that they swept a sexual harassment case under the rug for Cohen. "Cohen wrote a column in 1986 which argued owners of jewelry stores were right to refuse to allow entry to young black men because of a fear of crime. This column led to the Washington Post's having to apologize.[16]" "Ta-Nehisi Coates for example wrote: "The problem is that Richard Cohen thinks being repulsed isn't actually racist, but "conventional" or "culturally conservative." Obstructing the right of black humans and white humans to form families is a central feature of American racism. If retching at the thought of that right being exercised isn't racism, then there is no racism.[25]"  So, Cohen is not only a sexist pervert, but a sexist perverted racist. Yet, the lying imbecile has the gall to call Trump Hitler? I don't know about anyone else, but have you seen Trump locking up Jews, Freemasons, Gays, or anyone else that he considers undesirable, then having them murdered? Cohen also admitted in an anti-Semitic article, that he lacked "religious conviction".  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cohen_(columnist) I get a kick out of Bono, (Paul David Hewson), who is nothing but a washed up Irish druggie, thinking that he is fit to tell Americans how they should act about politics.
    1
  6406. 1
  6407. 1
  6408. 1
  6409. 1
  6410. 1
  6411. 1
  6412. 1
  6413. 1
  6414. 1
  6415. 1
  6416. 1
  6417. 1
  6418. 1
  6419. 1
  6420. 1
  6421. 1
  6422. A very good description. From my study, one of the first mentions of a culture inventing an anti-God, having an evil and good God, was the Persians. Zoroaster's original theory was that of an angry and good spirit, but it was the two sides of the same spirit. That also alludes to yin and yang, black and white, good and bad within the whole, or our spirit having a duality of the whole. Somewhere after, it was changed into an evil entity, and surprise, the Persian rulers called their enemies worshipers of this evil entity, for war, and that those who broke their moral law would be punished by this evil God. Of course, the Persians took the Levant, and this belief came there. Judaic scholars think that this was the basis for the book of Enoch (about 200 BC), and if I recall, this belief made its way into the Essene sect. The Pharisees never believed in it, but believed in an afterlife, though the Sadducee never believed in an afterlife nor resurrection. Jesus, and the apostles, came from the Pharisees, and after Jesus' death, they became known as the Nazarene sect, which later became Christians with the Romans. Christianity remained Judaic, for about another 100 years. After that was when the Romans bastardized it, and added Greco-Roman paganism and Persian Zoroastrianism. Also, Paul was an Essene, (though he claimed he wasn't), it is said, and it also may be where this also came from. Greco-Roman mythology had the God, Hades, who was later renamed, Pluton. He was the God of the underworld and wealth. This was also where the Roman Catholic purgatory developed, where Hades, now renamed Satan by the Christian Romans, would punish the wicked. The story of a fallen angel can be found here, where Zeus slayed Typhon, and cast him to Hades. The appearance of a God of the underworld can be found in ancient Mesopotamia, where they had a Goddess of the underworld, who was married to a minor God of war. However, here, nobody was punished with hell fire and eternal damnation. At most, the spirit was shunned by the others, and the sin was lying, as the Goddess kept a book of the liars. Greek mythology most likely came from Mesopotamia, though the Gods were a little different, had different names, and the tales changed. Jewish monotheists, saw that the ancients, such as from Mesopotamia and Canaan, were calling phenomenons of nature Gods, and they saw these as being part of one God, which is the entirety of nature, infinity, or the ALL. Thus, God is both evil and good, and since our soul is a part of Gods, it also has a dual nature. When we die, that part of God, our soul, goes back. One can find this within the Zohar, which explains the metaphor of the Torah. Anyhow, the Roman church played with the text of the Gospels, where they capitalized the Hebrew word, Satan, and deleted the word "the" in front of it in several places. Luke 10:18 is one place, where they claim that it means a fallen angel, but in fact, it is speaking about the people and city of Capernaum falling like lightning from Heaven. In certain scholarly circles, this church trickery is known as the big lie. Satan is a Hebrew word that means adversary, and can be used for those who block or hinder mans progress. Jesus called Peter a satan, and a stumbling block. He was most assuredly not a fallen angel, who punishes sinners with hell fire and brimstone. Here, the word was used correctly, as Peter was arguing with Jesus, and he was impeding what Jesus wanted to do.
    1
  6423. 1
  6424. 1
  6425. 1
  6426. 1
  6427. 1
  6428. 1
  6429. 1
  6430. Boslhevism Happened: Classical liberalism, (that of John Locke), has nothing to do with what is taking place within the Democratic Party today, as that's not liberalism. The term, liberal, today, when compared to classical liberalism, is nowhere close. The closest thing, today, to classical liberalism, is true conservative Republicanism, not that of the neoconservatives and the left. Classical liberalism is the theory of natural rights. Freedom of speech and the press, freedom of religion, a right to keep and bear arms, to be protected from illegal search and seizure, a right to a trial by jury, etc. Today's liberalism definition, equates to people who believe in cultural Marxism or communism, who want a totalitarian state, believe in socialist welfare, have a hatred of natural rights, (when it is against them, such as free speech), and hate capitalism. They're completely different in ideology. They're actually Marxists. The Democrats haven't really practiced classical liberalism since Woodrow Wilson, and especially since the years of FDR. There were even hints of the Democrats being against classical liberalism, with Thomas Jefferson, which is one of the reasons behind the formation of the Republican Party, out of the Whigs, later on. Manifest destiny, (which runs counter to classical liberalism), was one of the main things that the Republicans were against, and were formed over, along with the actions resulting from Jackson, over the emerging middle-class. Slavery was another. From the time of Jefferson, the Democrats slowly grew against classical liberalism.
    1
  6431. 1
  6432. 1
  6433. 1
  6434. 1
  6435. 1
  6436. 1
  6437. 1
  6438. 1
  6439. 1
  6440. 1
  6441. 1
  6442. 1
  6443. 1
  6444. 1
  6445. Below is the law which covers the above, and defines what a domestic terrorist is. 18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions (5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion If you notice, they only have to appear to be intending to coerce a civilian population. Coercion can be from a teacher or professor to their students (students are members of the civilian population), where they were coerced to protest or riot. There is also the hate crime law in the US below. 18 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts (1) Offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person. Hate crime definition: "A criminal act motivated by another person's (usually the victim's) race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Also called a bias crime. Can be a crime committed against a person, property, or society." Thus, a if teacher or professor teaches bigotry to their students toward those of religion (Christians who they're labeling as bigots, racists, etc), and a student or protester causes bodily harm to one of religion, then the teacher or professor is an accessory to the crime due to coercing them to protest. They may even be guilty over their nationalist claims, by teaching them that nationalism in the US is something bad, then coercing them to protest, since this may fall under national origin (protesting over those who declare themselves a national US citizen, and causing harm to them over it).
    1
  6446. 1
  6447. 1
  6448. 1
  6449. 1
  6450. 1
  6451. 1
  6452. 1
  6453. 1
  6454. 1
  6455. 1
  6456. 1
  6457. 1
  6458. 1
  6459. 1
  6460. 1
  6461. 1
  6462. 1
  6463. 1
  6464. 1
  6465. 1
  6466. 1
  6467. 1
  6468. 1
  6469. 1
  6470. 1
  6471. 1
  6472. Paul, JK Rowling will say anything, around a group of giggling young feminists, in order to sell her books, and, oh yes, those two new movies that are coming out. She better watch her gob, if she doesn't want a boycott. Those two movie deals could buy her some more old manors, which she will still refuse to fill with refugees. Well, she's a nouveau-rich blond feminist, who fell in with the Hollywood crowd, so what can one expect? If she keeps it up, the crown will own her over taxes, as those old manors and property are highly taxed, which was why the families dumped them. (My family unloaded their old manor on the church, in Hampshire, many years ago). Also, Rowling might ought to look at the past history of the builders and owners of some of those manors, as some of the gentry who owned those, made money from the slave trade. One will find that all leftists, such as potato-head Mike, start an argument with slurs, using words such as fascist, racist, bigot, etc., and then use the straw man approach. They think that they can belittle you, hoping you'll feel guilt, and hope that it will stifle you, but it only does the opposite, when one is in promoting truth. Saul Alinsky would be proud of potato-head Mike, along with Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin, for at least trying to promote their ideology. I still can't believe that potato-head Mike made the statement about finding the remains of one black, and cited it as proof. I guffawed at that. Paul, you did well. You allowed potato-head Mike to place the noose around his own neck, and you kicked the stool out from under him. Never get angry with them, keep a cool head, and a clean vocabulary, which always gives you the moral high ground over them. Their use of slurs, and in most cases, vulgarity, proves what type of person they are.
    1
  6473. 1
  6474. 1
  6475. 1
  6476. 1
  6477. 1
  6478. 1
  6479. 1
  6480. 1
  6481. 1
  6482. 1
  6483. 1
  6484. 1
  6485. 1
  6486. 1
  6487. 1
  6488. 1
  6489. 1
  6490. 1
  6491. 1
  6492. Even though the Ayatollah is on friendly terms with Russia, they're not friendly enough for Russia to save them, unless it's over their oil and gas. Left wing politics still controls Iran somewhat within the Shia, as during Mosaddegh, the National Front had the Communist Party and strong Nazi influence within, which still exists in some parts of the Middle-East, especially Egypt. The only thing the Ayatollah despised about them was their secularism, but many radicals are not secular. The radicals in the National Front of Iran is where a lot of the terrorism originates, even though they were supposedly suppressed in 1981. Of course, when hasn't the Communists or Nazis not been genocidal maniacs? The Mullah's ties to the MB is the Nazi and Communist connection. A case in point was Yasser Arafat in Palestine, who was a KGB operative that was selected from the MB in Egypt, and was trained and given fake papers, then sent to Palestine. Arafat was a cousin of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who was a Nazi Muslim radical that worked with Hitler, and was the father of today's modern jihad. Today's Grand Mufti is supposedly a part of the same family. The same type of operatives and activists are within Iran today. When I read about how the National Front Shiites supposedly fled under the Mullahs, I have to laugh. Many of the secular merely went to ground after 1981, and the left wing religious radicals are still within their government. I believe the Ayatollah to be more of a Nazi ideologue myself. Socialism is socialism, no matter if it's National or International. Today's MB: "While the parties [MB and Iran] have had informal contacts since the founding of Iran’s Islamic Republic in 1979, the relationship entered a new phase as the Muslim Brotherhood rose to power in Egypt after the 2011 uprising. When the Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohamed Morsi, was elected Egypt’s president in 2012, official contacts between Cairo and Tehran increased. But Morsi, forced to heed the views of Egypt’s military establishment and traditional allies, proved unwilling to reestablish formal diplomatic ties, which had been severed in 1979, during his first and only year in office. Instead, the new Egyptian administration undertook a more gradual approach toward warming relations with Iran." "The shared basis in political Islam between the Brotherhood, one of the world’s largest and most influential Sunni Islamist movements, and Iran’s Shia Islamic Republic facilitated cooperation between the two sides. Ideologically, both parties advocate for the establishment of an Islamic state, religious proselytism (daawa), and Muslim unity. They also share some common geopolitical aims, including the need to confront Israel and liberate Palestine." https://carnegie-mec.org/2019/03/19/mismatched-expectations-iran-and-muslim-brotherhood-after-arab-uprisings-pub-78621
    1
  6493. 1
  6494. 1
  6495. 1
  6496. 1
  6497. 1
  6498. 1
  6499. 1
  6500. 1
  6501. 1
  6502. 1
  6503. 1
  6504. 1
  6505. 1
  6506. 1
  6507. 1
  6508. 1
  6509. 1
  6510. 1
  6511. 1
  6512. 1
  6513. 1
  6514. 1
  6515. 1
  6516. 1
  6517. 1
  6518. 1
  6519. There is only one thing that makes work attractive for most, and that is survival. Some do love their jobs, because they are a chosen field, but when compared to the ones who need employment to live, there is a huge divide. The ones who will not stay employed know that a government handout will be waiting. Plus, there is the temporary employment mentality of today. The socialist power elite thought that they could get rid of manufacturing, and place everyone into the service industry, co-op and communal agriculture, or office jobs, which they considered their "utopia." Moving out manufacturing was due to the greed of the socialist power elite, as they still have that slave labor mentality. That is why they shifted manufacturing to Asia, while preaching the virtues of utopia. Manufacturing made the USA, but a cabal (the Old Guard faction) led by the Rockefeller family was behind removing it. Many of us still remember the Rockefeller visits to China, along with Henry Kissinger, as well as their praise of Mao. That, and you still have young minds being brainwashed by the likes of socialist churches (Unitarianism/reformed), socialist families and schools, as well as the prattle inside trade unions who conspire with the socialist power elite in smoke-filled rooms. The Old Guard socialist power elite have done everything in their power, by creating laws and regulations, as well as controlling certain trade unions, to make the US unfriendly to manufacturing and labor. The socialist power elite were behind the creation of certain mega-stores, so these stores could peddle their Asian goods upon the public, and shut down main street. If manufacturers, owned by the socialist power elite, controlled the heads of certain trade unions, and those manufacturers wanted to move their manufacturing to another country, in order to take advantage of what is essentially slave labor, then what would those manufacturers have the unions to do? Give them an excuse? What about controlling politicians and government officials who are at the top of regulatory agencies? That is the Old Guard faction for you, and the public was hoodwinked long ago.
    1
  6520. 1
  6521. 1
  6522. 1
  6523. 1
  6524. 1
  6525. 1
  6526. 1
  6527. 1
  6528. 1
  6529. 1
  6530. 1
  6531. 1
  6532. 1
  6533. 1
  6534. 1
  6535. 1
  6536. 1
  6537. 1
  6538. 1
  6539. 1
  6540. 1
  6541. 1
  6542. 1
  6543. 1
  6544. 1
  6545. 1
  6546. 1
  6547. 1
  6548. 1
  6549. 1
  6550. 1
  6551. 1
  6552. 1
  6553. 1
  6554. 1
  6555. 1
  6556. 1
  6557. 1
  6558. 1
  6559. 1
  6560. 1
  6561. 1
  6562. 1
  6563. 1
  6564. 1
  6565. 1
  6566. 1
  6567. 1
  6568. 1
  6569. 1
  6570. 1
  6571. 1
  6572. 1
  6573. 1
  6574. 1
  6575. 1
  6576. 1
  6577. 1
  6578. 1
  6579. 1
  6580. 1
  6581. 1
  6582. 1
  6583. 1
  6584. 1
  6585. 1
  6586. 1
  6587. 1
  6588. 1
  6589. 1
  6590. 1
  6591. 1
  6592. 1
  6593. 1
  6594. 1
  6595. 1
  6596. 1
  6597. 1
  6598. 1
  6599. 1
  6600. 1
  6601. 1
  6602. 1
  6603. 1
  6604. 1
  6605. 1
  6606. 1
  6607. 1
  6608. 1
  6609. 1
  6610. 1
  6611. 1
  6612. 1
  6613. 1
  6614. You're witnessing the real face of Federalism, which fell in with Christian Socialism by 1900. That is what overtook the European nations leading to the creation of the EU, and some want to copy that in the UK. This is what the Atlanticists push, who hopes to one day create a huge federated union between Europe and North America. This was also what Pres. 45 swore to stop, and we know what happened to him. Now, they're jumping with joy that 45 lost the election, which they helped to lose by propaganda. Pompeo, while addressing the Marshall Fund in Belgium as the Sec. of State, informed some of the nations that they would have to start giving their fair share, pulling their own weight, and that the US was beginning to wean Germany off the US teat. It was also explained to them that the US would no longer be willing to be the world's police. We saw the results with the slow military drawdown in the Middle East during 45, which was shifted to Asia. Several articles have been written about this. This is what led to Europe looking at other sources of energy other than fossil fuels. Plus, the UN blames fossil fuels for creating wars, and there is some truth to that, but it's socially biased. The wars were due to socialist nations nationalizing the refineries and wells. They didn't want just a percentage of the profit; they wanted everything after all the hard work had been done, and paid for by foreign investment. In other words, it was theft. That was what occurred in Central and South America as well. The US and allied national corporations held farms and factories there for years, but when the socialists were voted into power, they nationalized every industry. That was what the many coups were over. Socialists cry over "imperialism," but they never stop to think about it being other people's money and time from foreign nations that developed their nation's economies before the socialists nationalized (stole) every industry. Their own theft brought them grief and turmoil, as the corporations were not going to sit still while being robbed. Listen closely to 45. He never mentions federalism, only republicanism. His republicanism is that of Jackson and Jefferson, not the fake one created by the GOP under Lincoln, who were federalists. Lincoln, and many others in their new party that was created from the Whig Party, had started listening to Marx, and by the late 1800s, Christian Socialism hit the US in the northern states, especially New York and Massachusetts. That was when Trotsky came to the US. By the 1930s, they started slowly changing their views and started favoring "thrid-way" socialist politics by the fifties and sixties. However, look at what that brought to Sweden.
    1
  6615. 1
  6616. 1
  6617. 1
  6618. 1
  6619. 1
  6620. 1
  6621. 1
  6622. 1
  6623. 1
  6624. 1
  6625. 1
  6626. 1
  6627. 1
  6628. 1
  6629. Look into what Joe and BoJo signed while in Cornwall. That new document, which replaces the old, now reads like a socialist's wet dream. Wiki on Atlanticism: "The Atlantic Charter of 1941 declared by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill established the goals of the Allies for the post-war world, and was later adopted by all the Western allies. Following the Second World War, the Western European countries were anxious to convince the U.S. to remain engaged in European affairs to deter any possible aggression by the Soviet Union. This led to the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty which established the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the main institutional consequence of Atlanticism, which binds all members to defend the others, and led to the long-term garrisoning of American and Canadian troops in Western Europe." "Supranational integration of the North Atlantic area had emerged as a focus of thinking among intellectuals on both sides of the Atlantic already in the late 19th century. Although it was not known as Atlanticism at the time (the term was coined in 1950), they developed an approach coupling soft and hard power which would to some extent integrate the two sides of the Atlantic. The idea of an attractive "nucleus" union was the greatest soft power element; the empirical fact of the hegemonic global strength such a union would hold was the hard power element. This approach was eventually implemented to a certain degree in the form of NATO, the G7 grouping and other Atlanticist institutions. In the long debate between Atlanticism and its critics in the 20th century, the main argument was whether deep and formal Atlantic integration would serve to attract those still outside to seek to join, as Atlanticists argued, or alienate the rest of the world and drive them into opposite alliances." Thus, the creation of BRICS by those who were "alienated."
    1
  6630. 1
  6631. 1
  6632. The left, who loves the socialism of Marx, and claims that there's always a "class struggle," will not be able to understand capitalism. That is, unless, the lie of socialism or communism is exposed. First, Marx claimed that there was always a class struggle, by stating "freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another." The problem was, that those Lords had the ability to build large projects, castles, villages, etc, who kept the citizens employed and working for many years. By Marx stating "guildmaster and journeyman," he thinks that the unskilled should receive the same pay, though lacking the skill and the merit. This is because Marx was only a writer, and nobody wanted to pay him for his drivel. His other source of income, was bumming off Engels. He had actually married, but moved to London, and lived in squalor, having more children than he could afford. He received an inheritance from his father, which he blew 1/3 of, on his rebellion. Marx, then goes on to state "the bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his 'natural superiors,' and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, callous 'cash payment." Here, Marx seems to contradict himself, by stating that the bourgeoisie (middle-class), who were the landed employers, put an end to feudalism, which Marx wants back, so that we become subjected to our "natural superiors," which he saw himself as one of. That is feudalism that he wanted back, and that is what socialism is. You can own no property, and the government nationalizes industry (steals it away from its owners). Thus, you are dependent on the government, for everything. You can't advance, unless you are a part of the ruling authority's clique. The ruling authority become the rich. Also, Marx hates "cash." There's a reason for this, which you'll find it in his paper called: On The Jewish Question. In this paper, Marx calls both Christian and Jew, snakes, the same thing, and makes the bogus claim that they are responsible for money. Marx directly blames the Jews for capitalism, because he was a lazy, self-hating, atheist, ethnic Jew, who's father baptized as a Christian. In this paper, Marx claims that for the Jews and Christians to succeed, they must become atheists. Marx was one of the worst anti-Semites, and his hatred has carried on to this very day. It is why those such as Marcuse and Adorno, later on, switched from criticizing the economy, to criticizing our western culture. It was their plan B to destroy capitalism. Socialists are regressive, wanting to take us back to the time of the early 1600s, and before.
    1
  6633. 1
  6634. 1
  6635. 1
  6636. 1
  6637. 1
  6638. 1
  6639. 1
  6640. 1
  6641. 1
  6642. 1
  6643. 1
  6644. 1
  6645. 1
  6646. 1
  6647. 1
  6648. 1
  6649. 1
  6650. 1
  6651. 1
  6652. 1
  6653. 1
  6654. 1
  6655. 1
  6656. 1
  6657. 1
  6658.  @frankvanhooft3927  You seem to think that the US had an imperial hand in creating NATO after the Treaty of Dunkirk. All of it was created under Truman at the British Government's request. The Marshall Plan of April 1947, which was created one month after the Treaty of Dunkirk, was used to bring it all about. . "Despite the frequent charges that NATO was a product of America’s imperial reach after World War II, it was Europe’s initiative—not that of the United States—which opened the way to NATO. Led by Britain’s Foreign Minister, Ernest Bevin, and France’s counterpart, Georges Bidault, Western Europeans feared that their efforts to collaborate in a future defense organization could not succeed without American involvement. Their economies could not be rebuilt without massive American support, and their defense capabilities could not cope with the aggressive Soviet Union without an American commitment to counterbalance the Communist adversary." https://law.emory.edu/eilr/content/volume-34/issue-special/articles/origins-nato-1948-1949.html . Correspondence between Britain and the US: . Inverchapel correspondence to the US Sec. of State, about Mr. Bevin’s views on the formation of a Western Union, now declassified: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1948v03/d3 . The Chargé in London (Gallman) to the US Secretary of State asking for US approval, declassified: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1948v03/d1 . Spaak was also seeking Washington's assistance: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1948v03/d2 . All released documents: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1948v03/ch1
    1
  6659. 1
  6660. 1
  6661. 1
  6662. 1
  6663. 1
  6664. 1
  6665. 1
  6666. 1
  6667. 1
  6668. 1
  6669. 1
  6670. 1
  6671.  British Brexit Confusion  Yes, I understand that, but the EU states (Italy and France) are breaking that very UNHCR agreement, where they agreed to take them, as the refugees are arriving directly there via the boats from Africa. The Federal clause forces all EU states into acceptance, from the way I read it. The Refugees are breaking that agreement as well, by not quickly turning themselves into the EU authorities, and asking for asylum there. The EU is allowing them to cross the channel, which I'm sure you know, and I'd say they're also breaking the ECHR law as well by doing so. You also have Turkey, another UNHCR state, who accepted them, but are using them to blackmail Europe. In the Americas, Guatemala isn't bound to accept them, (not a signatory of the UNHCR), so they're allowing them to cross into Mexico, which does have to take them, though they turn a blind eye and allow them to travel through their nation to the US, which is not legally bound to take them, because they didn't directly arrive in the US. Costa Rica should be taking them too. There has also been reports of the refugees coming directly into Mexico by other means, where Mexico is bound to accept them, but you see what's happening, where they allow them to swarm the US border. Worse, many are fleeing Columbia, a signatory state, and there are the drug cartel's actions as well. On top of that, JB is trying to deny Cuban refugees, who are directly arriving by boat, to Florida. The US is obliged to take them as a signatory state, and they are welcomed by the public. Canada claims they're turning them back, but word has come that they've allowed many entrance.
    1
  6672. 1
  6673. 1
  6674. 1
  6675. 1
  6676. 1
  6677. 1
  6678. That John McCain war-loving crowd is truly tied to the old Nazi Party, as well as organized crime, and has been since the thirties. It's within both of the political parties, (neoliberals and neocons). Since FDR, the public hasn't had much of a choice in who to vote for, as the socialist power elite, (Rockefeller, etc), controlled both parties. "We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future."__HRC, July 15th, 2009, at CFR-DC, about the CFR moving into Washington DC. "The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens." --Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werne “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a good idea after all.” – Strobe Talbot (Clintons’ Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time (July 20th, 1992). Talbot attended Oxford with Bill Clinton, who was there on a Rhodes Scholarship. "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."__James Paul Warburg, (Vice Chairman of the Board at Bank of the Manhattan Company), and Chairman of the Council of Foreign Relations, testimony before the U.S. Senate (Feb 17, 1950) as quoted by Family Guardian Fellowship, The Great IRS Hoax, Form #11.302 (Feb 14, 2014).
    1
  6679. 1
  6680. 1
  6681. 1
  6682. 1
  6683. 1
  6684. 1
  6685. 1
  6686. 1
  6687. 1
  6688. 1
  6689. 1
  6690. 1
  6691. 1
  6692. 1
  6693. 1
  6694. 1
  6695. 1
  6696. 1
  6697. 1
  6698. 1
  6699. 1
  6700. 1
  6701. 1
  6702. 1
  6703. 1
  6704. 1
  6705. 1
  6706. 1
  6707. 1
  6708. I would not place much trust in any poll. The Trump and Johnson elections are proof of that. That being said, nobody asks the question: why do they want him impeached? No MSM source will expose it, and it sure isn't about his looks or actions. It was about what he intended on doing after he took office, which he put into action shortly after Sessions was accepted as the AG. Nobody, it seems, reads the DOJ's news website, but June 2017 started the ball rolling, and it made people such as Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi tremble with fear. The real news wasn't reported by any media. Ukraine investigation began. 33 indictments; Russian mafia. Oligarchs' list; accounts frozen, property seized. Bank investigations over money laundering. Huge fines. Two honeytrap blackmail rackets ended. Sinaloa cartel busted, El Chapo brought in. (Russian mob supplier). Enforcement at the border increased. Other gangs busted, as well as smaller suppliers. Crackdown on cocaine, multiple tonnages seized. Crackdown on Heroin, Fentanyl, and Scrips. Non-physicians found to have a DEA license. An investigation into nuclear material. Megatons for Megawatts. Russian reset. An investigation into why Project Cassandra was dropped. An investigation into how the oligarchs stole heavy industry in the old Soviet bloc, starting with Yukos Oil and Gazprom. Who is Mr. Mifsud from Malta? Who were the Mifsud brothers, such as Big Frank Mifsud, from 1950s-70s London? Who was Stephen Ward of London, and what happened there? What is Brighton Beach famous for? Who was its Rep in Congress? Who is the Senator? Who are the oligarchs, and how did they make their money? What is the City of London famous for? Why was Canary Wharf made into a banking district? What are the Panama and Paradise Papers? Why was attention put on Prince Andrew? Why did Qatar drop out of OPEC? Was Hezbollah running drugs? What is the Great Game? Now you know.
    1
  6709. 1
  6710. 1
  6711. 1
  6712. 1
  6713. 1
  6714. 1
  6715. 1
  6716. 1
  6717. 1
  6718. 1
  6719. 1
  6720. 1
  6721. 1
  6722. 1
  6723. 1
  6724. 1
  6725. 1
  6726. 1
  6727. 1
  6728. 1
  6729. 1
  6730. 1
  6731.  Clarence Spangle  You can see it all though their policy, what with them trying to force labor unions on the working public, and every radical social program imaginable. Trotsky's idea was international in scope, with permanent revolution to spread their disease everywhere. That's what the UN is for, and what is behind globalism. All the shipping problems, now, go back to two unions, the Teamsters, and the Longshoreman's. Who were they affiliated with in the past? Trotsky hated Stalin, who he claimed was a "nationalist," though Stalin was fully ready to spread Soviet socialism everywhere when the SU became strong enough. The CEOs and bankers that helped Stalin, though, really favored Trotsky's ideas of world domination. All the left-winger CEOs rushed to help Stalin build manufacturing plants there, which were turned over to the state after they were up and running. They did that while we were suffering through the Great Depression, which proves that it was purposely brought about, where they tried to blame it all on the Old Right, which they wanted rid of. They had to have a crisis for FDR to "fix," who was deep into the pockets of the Anglo-American elite, and their bankers. I listened to a famous UK historian state that FDR told Churchill that he was looking for a way for the US to enter the war, sometime before we did. The Yalta Conference was very telling, where FDR and Stalin made Churchill sit outside. The Roosevelts, Rockefellers and Astors were the kingpins, along with a certain banker elite, who they had just given a big lot of land to. It was a "we'll finance the government, and make you richer, if you'll scratch our backs."
    1
  6732. 1
  6733. 1
  6734. 1
  6735. 1
  6736. 1
  6737. 1
  6738. 1
  6739. 1
  6740. 1
  6741. 1
  6742. 1
  6743. 1
  6744. 1
  6745. 1
  6746. 1
  6747. 1
  6748. 1
  6749. 1
  6750. 1
  6751. 1
  6752. 1
  6753. 1
  6754. 1
  6755. 1
  6756. 1
  6757. 1
  6758. 1
  6759. 1
  6760. 1
  6761. 1
  6762. 1
  6763. 1
  6764. 1
  6765. 1
  6766. 1
  6767. 1
  6768. 1
  6769. 1
  6770. 1
  6771. 1
  6772. 1
  6773. 1
  6774. Bernie an independent? LOL! Hillary knows what he is, just as many others do. Bernie is known as a "fellow traveler," and this is the reason why the DNC yanked the rug out from under him. They did it with Henry Wallace in 1944, and they did it with Bernie in 2016. If anyone remembers the Colonel Sanders cartoon of Bernie, passing out chicken wings with the hammer and sickle on them, then they'll understand what a fellow traveler is. Hell, there are fellow travelers within the globalist neo-liberal group, even though it is considered liberal capitalism, who are behind attacking the Bill of Rights now. Bernie wouldn't have drew the numbers that he did, if Hillary had an actual platform that appealed to the left. The Democrats allowed a group of radical fellow travelers to take over the Democratic Party by the early 2000s, and they're now paying for it. How they'll dislodge them is beyond me, but if they don't, they'll end the Democratic Party. They better hope that they can get something like COINTELPRO operating again, but this time, legally, since the Democrats were behind destroying it, and they better hope that they can root the radicals out. The Democrats brought this upon their own self, over buying the radicals vote. Neo-liberalism was started by a group of elite businessmen and bankers, etc, during the Nixon administration. The Trilateral Commission founders admitted that they started the commission to bring Nixon down, because he was going to go after Johnson's welfare program, and that Nixon intended on actually prosecuting the war in Vietnam. They were behind setting Nixon up with Watergate, and their congressmen were behind defunding the war. Kissinger and Brzezinski was in the White House, working behind Nixon's back. Leaks were everywhere, just like now. What's happening with Trump, happened with Nixon. Did anyone ever wonder why Nixon stated that the Bohemian Grove was "faggy"? That is where the press and the elite got together, up a Californian hollow, just off the Russian River, to set it all up. They've been behind the attempted takedown of every Republican president, since that day, who didn't kowtow to their position. The Trilateral Commission coined the term, New World Order. They control the Fed, the IMF, and the World Bank. The left and the right are involved in it. David Rockefeller, Henry, Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Jimmy Carter set it all up. That is how Carter came out of nowhere, after Ford, and received the backing that he did.
    1
  6775. 1
  6776. 1
  6777. 1
  6778. 1
  6779. 1
  6780. 1
  6781. 1
  6782. 1
  6783. 1
  6784. 1
  6785. 1
  6786. 1
  6787. 1
  6788. 1
  6789. 1
  6790. 1
  6791. 1
  6792. 1
  6793. 1
  6794. 1
  6795. 1
  6796. 1
  6797. 1
  6798. 1
  6799. 1
  6800. 1
  6801. 1
  6802. 1
  6803. 1
  6804. 1
  6805. 1
  6806. 1
  6807. 1
  6808. 1
  6809. 1
  6810. 1
  6811. 1
  6812. 1
  6813. 1
  6814. 1
  6815. 1
  6816. 1
  6817. 1
  6818. 1
  6819. 1
  6820. 1
  6821. 1
  6822. This is not a newspaper, Simon, nor a publisher, according to them and US Federal law. It is a social media "platform," supposedly used for "hosting user content," which is video and commentary (a hosting platform). The comment section is here for the same reason as those that write into a paper to complain or agree. Censorship: "the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security." In the US, there is law that forbids censorship of the politically unacceptable, and even the obscene on free speech grounds, by the state, though these platforms are separate corporate entities, and that law doesn't apply. Thus, hosting sites like this were granted exemptions from discriminatory civil suits, by Congress, under Sec. 230, to "host" media, as a hosting platform, that might be unacceptable and objectionable to some. The problem, and by what Congress noted is, that they gave them an exemption to host media under protection, as a hosting platform, yet, they are censoring (deleting) media and comments that only a select group finds objectionable, thus, making them act a publisher, and leaving the author, or commentators for that matter, no legal civil recourse to sue over discrimination. It would be the same as a book store (host) refusing to place your authored book on the shelves, over them finding it politically unacceptable, even though what you authored was factual, and yet, you were blocked, by law, from suing them over discrimination if you so wished. Stating this, I believe that Congress is headed down a very slippery slope, which will open the door to hosting any and all content, the very worst of it, over a suit, and I believe that this is what these "hosts" really want. Remember what happened over the civil suit for "Deep Throat" over free speech?
    1
  6823. 1
  6824. 1
  6825. 1
  6826. 1
  6827. 1
  6828. 1
  6829. 1
  6830. 1
  6831. 1
  6832. 1
  6833. 1
  6834. 1
  6835. 1
  6836. 1
  6837. 1
  6838. 1
  6839. 1
  6840. 1
  6841. 1
  6842. 1
  6843. 1
  6844. 1
  6845. 1
  6846. 1
  6847. 1
  6848. 1
  6849. 1
  6850. 1
  6851. 1
  6852. 1
  6853. 1
  6854. 1
  6855. 1
  6856. 1
  6857. 1
  6858. 1
  6859. 1
  6860. 1
  6861. 1
  6862. 1
  6863. 1
  6864. 1
  6865. 1
  6866. 1
  6867. 1
  6868. 1
  6869. 1
  6870. 1
  6871. 1
  6872. 1
  6873. 1
  6874. 1
  6875. 1
  6876. 1
  6877. 1
  6878. 1
  6879. 1
  6880. 1
  6881. 1
  6882. 1
  6883. 1
  6884. They had started experimenting with opium, and what became Laudanum, in the sixteenth century. By the time of the Civil War, in the US, they also had Morphine (1820s), but the supply was sometimes low, thus, you got the patient drunk on whiskey before surgery. They also had chloroform at that time, but, again, the supply needed wasn't enough. "The most influential work [on opium] was by George Young, who published a comprehensive medical text entitled Treatise on Opium (1753). Young, an Edinburgh surgeon and physician, wrote this to counter an essay on opium by his contemporary Charles Alston, professor of botany and materia medica at Edinburgh, who had recommended the use of opium for a wide variety of conditions. Young countered this by emphasising the risks '...that I may prevent such mischief as I can, I here give it as my sincere opinion... that opium is a poison by which great numbers are daily destroyed.' Young gives a comprehensive account of the indications for the drug, including its complications. He is critical about writers whose knowledge of the drug is based on chemical or animal experiments rather than clinical practice. The treatise is a detailed, balanced, and valuable guide to prevailing knowledge and practice. As it gained popularity, opium, and after 1820, morphine, was mixed with a wide variety of agents, drugs, and chemicals including mercury, hashish, cayenne pepper, ether, chloroform, belladonna, whiskey, wine, and brandy."__Wiki on Laudanum. During the Opium Wars, both the US and UK knew of the practical medical uses of opium, especially the Scots. The Civil War was what caused the great addiction to opioids, which, eventually, brought about the Harrison Narcotics Act in 1915.
    1
  6885. 1
  6886. 1
  6887. 1
  6888. 1
  6889. 1
  6890. 1
  6891. 1
  6892. 1
  6893. 1
  6894. 1
  6895. 1
  6896. 1
  6897. 1
  6898. 1
  6899. 1
  6900. 1
  6901. 1
  6902. 1
  6903. 1
  6904. 1
  6905. 1
  6906. 1
  6907. 1
  6908. 1
  6909. 1
  6910. 1
  6911. 1
  6912. 1
  6913. 1
  6914. 1
  6915. 1
  6916. 1
  6917. 1
  6918. 1
  6919. 1
  6920. 1
  6921. 1
  6922. 1
  6923. 1
  6924. 1
  6925. 1
  6926. What is considered the first four civilizations really describes the areas that were non-nomadic, the most advanced, and at similar levels of development and government. There were others places, which were older and might be considered a community, but not considered "civilized." I'm not sure how civilized the people that built Göbekli Tepe were, but they were more advanced than most, at that time, because of what they built. . The first four, known as the first "civilizations," especially Mesopotamia, had government (4,000 BCE), and law (Code of Urukagina 2,380–2,360 BC), and were advanced in language (Proto-Indo-European and Indo-European, 4,500 BCE), writing (3200 BC), mathematics, architecture, and skill. What I have found is that civilization followed the pastoral-farming people, and their language, which spread from the areas on either side of the Caucasus, as well as the lands on either side of the mountain ranges leading to the Indus Valley, and the Urals, which goes back to the domestication of the Aurochs, (wild cattle), and the change from hunter gatherer to farming and herding. They had also domesticated the horse, and invented the wheel and wagon, or chariot, which created an unstoppable military. It's also why the early civilization's ruling class wore cattle horns on their headdress, and even venerated cattle. . However, the domestication of the Aurochs supposedly occurred around 8,000 BCE, and over the next 2,000 years, what became known as the first four non-nomadic agricultural "civilizations," which were tied to the Proto-Indo-European language, sprang up from that by about 6,000 to 5,500 BCE in the Fertile Crescent and elsewhere. . "A "civilized" way of life is ultimately linked to conditions coming almost exclusively from intensive agriculture. Gordon Childe defined the development of civilization as the result of two successive revolutions: the Neolithic Revolution, triggering the development of settled communities, and the Urban Revolution, which enhanced tendencies towards dense settlements, specialized occupational groups, social classes, exploitation of surpluses, monumental public buildings and writing." . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastoralism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastoral_farming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
    1
  6927. 1
  6928. 1
  6929. 1
  6930. 1
  6931. 1
  6932. 1
  6933. 1
  6934. 1
  6935. 1
  6936. 1
  6937. 1
  6938. 1
  6939. 1
  6940. P Lewin: The big lie about "the switch" that the Democrats tell is the best one. They claim that there was a switch, during Nixon, like the Democrats and Republicans switched, because the Democrats lost the south. It was northern workers moving in droves to the south, for employment, that did it. They think that we don't know about the black communists, who took over the automotive unions in Michigan, causing strikes. The New Communist Movement, (NCM groups), formed "the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement (DRUM), which evolved into the League of Revolutionary Black Workers (LRBW), was formed by factory workers rather than student activists. The AFL-CIO leadership supported the Vietnam War and sought to avoid strikes, but union workers saw through this and independently organized a series of wildcat strikes. Radical Marxist and other African-American auto workers subsequently formed DRUM. From 1968 to 1971 DRUM and the league acted as a dual union, with black leadership, within the United Auto Workers. In the late 1970s a group labeled the May 19th Communist Organization was created, going on a bombing campaign." They think that we forget about the blacks flooding north, to obtain employment in Michigan and Illinois, along with a multitude of other large manufacturing states. They leave this history out of their tales about the big lie: "the switch." Michael Moore wonders what happened to Flint Michigan? This is what happened. The blacks sold themselves to the communist movement, with Johnson's promise of welfare.
    1
  6941. 1
  6942. 1
  6943. 1
  6944. 1
  6945. 1
  6946. 1
  6947. 1
  6948. 1
  6949. 1
  6950. 1
  6951. 1
  6952. 1
  6953. 1
  6954. 1
  6955. 1
  6956. 1
  6957. 1
  6958. 1
  6959. 1
  6960. 1
  6961. 1
  6962. 1
  6963. 1
  6964. 1
  6965. 1
  6966. 1
  6967. 1
  6968. 1
  6969. 1
  6970. 1
  6971. 1
  6972. 1
  6973. 1
  6974. 1
  6975. 1
  6976. 1
  6977. 1
  6978. 1
  6979. 1
  6980. 1
  6981. 1
  6982. 1
  6983. 1
  6984. 1
  6985. 1
  6986. 1
  6987. 1
  6988. 1
  6989. 1
  6990. 1
  6991. 1
  6992. 1
  6993. 1
  6994. 1
  6995. 1
  6996. 1
  6997. 1
  6998. 1
  6999. In Patton's case, he must have not understood (or wasn't in the loop) that you do not go on to destroy a nation, such as Russia, which just had its heavy industry built by the Western power elite, during the Great Depression. Henry Ford, and the people at Occidental Petroleum would have raised hell over it. Hidden History 101. Paraphrasing an ex-Soviet during an interview: "The Soviet Union wasn't communism, it was state capitalism." Funny, don't you think, that after Nixon, China turned out the same? China practices the most extreme form of state capitalism. Q: Was the profits in the USSR and China ever fairly distributed to the people? "State capitalism is an economic system in which the state undertakes commercial (i.e. for-profit) economic activity and where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor and centralized management), or where there is otherwise a dominance of corporatized government agencies (agencies organized along business-management practices) or of publicly listed corporations in which the state has controlling shares. Marxist literature defines state capitalism as a social system combining capitalism with ownership or control by a state—by this definition, a state capitalist country is one where the government controls the economy and essentially acts like a single huge corporation, extracting the surplus value from the workforce in order to invest it in further production. This designation applies regardless of the political aims of the state (even if the state is nominally socialist). Many scholars argue that the Soviet Union and the countries modeled after it, including Maoist China, were state capitalist systems. Many scholars also argue that the current People's Republic of China constitutes a form of state capitalism."__Wikipedia on State Capitalism.
    1
  7000. 1
  7001. 1
  7002. 1
  7003. 1
  7004. 1
  7005. 1
  7006. 1
  7007. 1
  7008. 1
  7009. 1
  7010. 1
  7011. 1
  7012. 1
  7013. 1
  7014. 1
  7015. 1
  7016. 1
  7017. 1
  7018. 1
  7019. 1
  7020. 1
  7021. 1
  7022. 1
  7023. 1
  7024. 1
  7025. 1
  7026. 1
  7027. 1
  7028. 1
  7029. 1
  7030. 1
  7031. 1
  7032. 1
  7033. 1
  7034. 1
  7035. 1
  7036. 1
  7037. 1
  7038. 1
  7039. 1
  7040. 1
  7041. 1
  7042. 1
  7043. 1
  7044. 1
  7045. 1
  7046. 1
  7047. 1
  7048. 1
  7049. 1
  7050. 1
  7051. 1
  7052. 1
  7053. 1
  7054. 1
  7055. 1
  7056. 1
  7057. 1
  7058. 1
  7059. 1
  7060. 1
  7061. 1
  7062. 1
  7063. 1
  7064. 1
  7065. 1
  7066. 1
  7067. 1
  7068. 1
  7069. 1
  7070. 1
  7071. This is why I do not follow any religion but my own. I believe in God, and that is it. Religion, both monotheism, and polytheism have always been a part of the ancient three estates where man was deified as a god on earth. Religion installed the monarch, whereby by the church/high priest selected the ruler from the noble class (the landed wealthy power elite). Religion was formed as a pyramid scam used to control the masses for the ruling elite that they installed. Worse, religion is the root of money and usury. Religion has its good points, as far as teaching virtue, but it has many bad points and vices. Protestantism tried to counteract this, but the churches with hierarchies are all corrupt. Ray Stevens had a song that described it to a tee: "Would Jesus Wear A Rolex." Both Christianity and Islam have their roots in Judaism, and if the public knew the truth about the roots of Judaism, they would riot. Ask yourself, was there any archeological proof that King Soloman and David existed, or that more than one temple existed? This has been debated in scholarly circles for many years. What does Soloman really define? Sol = Sun or Son. Soloman = Son of Man. The monarch is called Sol. The ancient astral triad of the moon god and goddess mating to produce the sun god. The hidden secret is that religion is based upon the procreation of man, where the woman/goddess is venerated. Here, the royal bloodline is selected by the church from the wealthy Baal (landlords). This is what the Protestant movement tried to overturn, but it failed. This ancient scam is still in play, spreading its seeds of hate and malcontent, all for political power and wealth.
    1
  7072. 1
  7073. 1
  7074. 1
  7075. 1
  7076. 1
  7077. 1
  7078. 1
  7079. 1
  7080. 1
  7081. 1
  7082. 1
  7083. 1
  7084. 1
  7085. 1
  7086. The Patriot Act was a direct result of the Church Committee, believe it or not, and not 9/11. What happened, was that a radical left-wing group broke into a building, and stole documents exposing COINTELPRO. That program started in 1956, and it's first purpose was to infiltrate and subvert factions and activist groups in the US, with the first being the Communists. The problem, was that the program was illegal, and the majority of their investigations were done without warrants. It continued, and was used against the black uprising and MLK, etc, during the sixties and seventies. After it was exposed, and the Church Committee condemned it, and there were three executive orders written, banning what it did. What happened next, was that the government used 9/11 as an excuse to legalize much of what they had done under COINTELPRO. Now, we have ANTIFA and BLM, on top of Muslim insurgents, and the government will not let that go to waste. You'll see more of what was within COINTELPRO legalized. They've already relaxed the no-assassination order, to allow the killing of terrorists. What will happen if the president lifts section 2.11 of EO 12333 entirely? The president can do that with a stroke of a pen. You might start seeing the leaders of ANTIFA suddenly disappear, or their bodies are found with a suicide note. The government has done it before, and they'll do it again. They already have a law on the books, which covers the members of ANTIFA, and that is the Communist Control Act of 1954, on top of the Patriot Act, but they'll eventually chip away at EO 12333, until they have COINTELPRO completely legalized. Guilfoyle's words are the beginning of it.
    1
  7087. 1
  7088. 1
  7089. 1
  7090. 1
  7091. 1
  7092. 1
  7093. 1
  7094. 1
  7095. 1
  7096. 1
  7097. 1
  7098. 1
  7099. 1
  7100. 1
  7101. 1
  7102. 1
  7103. 1
  7104. 1
  7105. 1
  7106. 1
  7107. 1
  7108. 1
  7109. 1
  7110. 1
  7111. 1
  7112. 1
  7113. 1
  7114. 1
  7115. 1
  7116. 1
  7117. 1
  7118. 1
  7119. 1
  7120. 1
  7121. 1
  7122. 1
  7123. 1
  7124. 1
  7125. 1
  7126. 1
  7127. 1
  7128. 1
  7129. 1
  7130. 1
  7131. 1
  7132. 1
  7133.  @denmark39  There are criminals (politicians and financiers) in each nation mentioned that worked together with Russia and Ukraine. US, British, and Israeli financiers financed the oligarchs. Yeltsin (Godfather) made a fortune during his time in power. They knowingly worked with the oligarchs (organized crime), and later, with Putin (Kingpin). The Obama administration might have made harsh statements against Putin and Medvedev because Russia booted out Bush's oilmen, but people in his administration knowingly worked with and profited from Putin, as well as oligarchs in Russia and Ukraine, especially people at the State Dept. The corruption leads back to the GHW Bush administration and Henry Kissinger. In the video, they mention Putin's salary. The amount is about the same in the US and elsewhere. How is it, that when politicians from the US, Britain, and Israel retire, they suddenly become multi-millionaires? Why do they always start foundations, and why do nations such as Ukraine become their biggest donors? Pay to play. That cash was owed to them for favors done while in office. All of it illegal. Obama suddenly had $40 million in his bank account, and the Clintons became filthy rich. It happened with McCain and the Bush family too. Worse, these politicians' children are involved. Yukos Oil is the beginning of the exposure. Pay for play, Russian Reset, Uranium One, Oil & gas industry. The BBC almost revealed it all, in their series called Russian Godfathers. Western powers trying to illegally take control of the old Soviet bloc's energy industry using organized crime and rigged bidding. If they had done it legally, I wouldn't have complained. After President Trump came into power, in June 2017, he was the first US president to have the DOJ indict and arrest 33 Russian mafia members at one go. Since Nixon, nobody at the DOJ would tip the Russian mafia. Trump then put out the Oligarch List, freezing the assets of the oligarchs in the US. He placed heavy sanctions on the Russian government. He brought in El Chapo, the oligarch's main drug supplier, and the rest of the Sinaloa cartel. Next, he shut down two blackmail networks and arrested most of their leaders. A few of them are still in hiding, being protected by Britain and Israel. That is also tied to human trafficking. Next, he targeted the human traffickers and pederasts. Last, a sweeping criminal investigation is ongoing within the US. This is why they didn't want Trump to become President. It will expose the corruption in Russia, Ukraine, Britain, Israel, and the US. None of this was hardly covered in the US mainstream media. Like I said, one nation is as guilty as the other, and one is as corrupt as the other. This video is only showing one side, not their own nation's guilt.
    1
  7134. 1
  7135. 1
  7136. 1
  7137. 1
  7138. 1
  7139. 1
  7140. 1
  7141. 1
  7142. 1
  7143. 1
  7144. 1
  7145. 1
  7146. 1
  7147. 1
  7148. 1
  7149. 1
  7150. 1
  7151. 1
  7152. 1
  7153. 1
  7154. 1
  7155. 1
  7156. 1
  7157. 1
  7158. 1
  7159. 1
  7160. 1
  7161. 1
  7162. 1
  7163. 1
  7164. 1
  7165. They claim that there was a reversal in the parties under Nixon, but they're incorrect; it happened much earlier, starting in 1910. Nixon was merely the first Neocon president, and he was a Quaker, where early proto-socialism formed. The truth is, the GOP, starting under Lincoln, was partial to the new socialist doctrine that was actually being preached in some Protestant churches, which was later known as Christian Socialism, and the "social gospel." That was the Whigs' belief under Clay and Greeley. Greeley even hired Karl Marx as his sole British correspondent, and published Marx's screeds in his New York newspaper. That was the real driving force behind the "Radical Republicans." During Reconstruction, they changed the D Party in the south to be just like them, and that resulted in the Bourbon Democrats, which Wilson was from. They were all tied to big business, especially the railroads. When the radical leftists had McKinley killed, Roosevelt came in, who was from this radical strain, and he brought in Progressivism. Wilson was also a Progressive, which is really Socialism. That was why Roosevelt formed the Bull Moose Party, so Wilson could win. From there, the D Party sided more and more with the radical left. However, the GOP tried to do an about-face, starting in 1910, where they booted the Progressives out between 1910-12, and tried to revert the party back to the original ideas of Thomas Jefferson. This faction became known as the Old Right, and they were anti-war, pro liberty, and they were protectionists. This was what 45 tried to revive, and what the Neocons hated. In 1952, the New York Intellectuals, who had left the D Party over their hatred for Stalin, because they were Trotskyites, infiltrated the GOP, and created the Neocons. The D Party had sided with Stalin, and FDR really cosied up to the USSR, where they went farther to the left. The GOP has been split since 1952, with the Neocons pulling the strings since that time, which is what 45 did his best to remove, and clean out. I think everybody is now wise to the Socialists, and it's time to take our nation back.
    1
  7166. 1
  7167. 1
  7168. 1
  7169. 1
  7170. 1
  7171. 1
  7172. 1
  7173. 1
  7174. 1
  7175. 1
  7176. 1
  7177. 1
  7178. 1
  7179. 1
  7180. 1
  7181. 1
  7182. 1
  7183. 1
  7184. 1
  7185. 1
  7186. 1
  7187. 1
  7188. 1
  7189. 1
  7190. 1
  7191. 1
  7192. 1
  7193. 1
  7194. 1
  7195. 1
  7196. 1
  7197. 1
  7198. 1
  7199. 1
  7200.    Jefferson wasn't quite as grand as the history books make him out to be. The Democrats were Jacobins that came to the US and founded the Democrat Clubs, and had infiltrated and joined the Anti-Federalist/Republicans. Jefferson had selected Burr, a radical NY Clintonian Jacobin, as the VP, as well as allowing Madison to bend his opinions on national credit. As a matter of fact, Jefferson was a thorn in Washington's side the entire time Washington was the president. Washington was politically neutral, an independent, and never claimed a party, but he wrote about Jefferson's antics. Hamilton came up with the plan to convert our war debt into a positive by selling bonds on the debt. That created credit and money (via bonds) and the ability to pay off the debt via tariffs. This led to Hamilton's bank. Needless to say, European banks didn't like the idea, and Burr was in bed with the Europeans. We have been under that system ever since. When Adams became president, the US was threatened by a French invasion, known as the XYZ affair. Many Jacobin Democrats were in the US military. Washington thought them to be traitorous, and that they would side with the French. Thus, in 1798, the year after Washington left office, Washington wrote to the Sec. of War: "that you could as soon scrub the blackamoor white, as to change the principles of a professed Democrat; and that he will leave nothing unattempted to overturn the Government of this Country." This was stated before Jefferson became president. The Democrats, who were very friendly with France, were against the actions taken to repay the war debt in full and to print money/bonds, (a bill of credit and an investment device), which would be used for capital for the northern manufacturers. Jefferson was of the Jacobin plantation and commune ideology as was Madison. The French Jacobins were the root of Communism. Communism started in France with Babeuf in the 1790s, long before Marx. It culminated in the Conspiracy of Equals. Why do you think the moderate and pro-capitalist Republicans split with the Democrats in 1824? Why do you think that Jefferson wrote that Weishaupt and the Illuminati had some good ideas?
    1
  7201. 1
  7202. 1
  7203. 1
  7204. 1
  7205. 1
  7206. 1
  7207. 1
  7208. 1
  7209. 1
  7210. 1
  7211. 1
  7212. 1
  7213. 1
  7214. 1
  7215. The corporations think that they are going to narrow the way copyright and fair use works, which is an attack on the freedom of speech, thinking that nobody will challenge them. In my opinion, I believe that the teeth of copyright law should be lessened from what it is, especially about how long one can claim a copyright. It should be brought in line with the time limits on patents. However, a Copyright does not grant one proprietary rights as does a patent. "In United States copyright law, transformation is a possible justification that use of a copyrighted work may qualify as fair use, i.e., that a certain use of a work does not infringe its holder's copyright due to the public interest in the usage. Transformation is an important issue in deciding whether a use meets the first factor of the fair-use test, and is generally critical for determining whether a use is in fact fair, although no one factor is dispositive. " In Folsom v. Marsh. In that case, Justice Story ruled that : "if [someone] thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticize, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy." In other words, the article shown or quoted must be transformed into something else, or be critiqued. Also, "the idea–expression divide or idea–expression dichotomy limits the scope of copyright protection by differentiating an idea from the expression or manifestation of that idea." "In the United States the 1879 opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Baker v. Selden[4] elaborated this doctrine, holding that, while exclusive rights to the "useful arts" (in this case bookkeeping) described in a book might be available by patent, only the description itself was protectable by copyright. In Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539, 556 (1985), the Supreme Court stated that "copyright's idea/expression dichotomy 'strike[s] a definitional balance between the First Amendment and the Copyright Act by permitting free communication of facts while still protecting an author's expression.'" (internal citation omitted). Additionally, in Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 201, 217 (1954), the Supreme Court stated "Unlike a patent, a copyright gives no exclusive right to the art disclosed; protection is given only to the expression of the idea—not the idea itself."" "In the Australian decision of Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co. Ltd v. Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479 at 498, Latham CJ used the analogy of reporting a person's fall from a bus: the first person to do so could not use the law of copyright to stop other people from announcing this fact." Quoted from Wikipedia. https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/four-factors/
    1
  7216. 1
  7217. 1
  7218. 1
  7219. 1
  7220. 1
  7221. 1
  7222. 1
  7223. 1
  7224. There's nothing wrong with a kibbutz, if people want to live that way. However, besides a few other agrarian religious sects (Amish, Mennonite, etc), they seem to always fail, going back to the days of Robert Owen and Owenism. Owen's son wrote about what occurred, and how the worst dregs of society showed up to live there; looking for others to keep them up. I'll bet many in the US do not know about Robert Owen. The main problem is, that a few with this ideology, especially the anarchists, always wish to force that lifestyle on society as a whole, and they're generally violent, and of a criminal element. Though some were zealots, and even wished to bring about the end of the world, for their utopian golden age to reappear. The thing is, there was never a utopian golden age that existed, and there have always been those who wanted to rule over others, starting with the earliest tribal leaders with the hunter-gatherers. Anarchists have always been the root of the problem behind utopianism, and one could honestly make the claim, by their profiles, that they are or were, either violent psychopaths or sociopaths. One can see this in the history of Brooklyn, and how some from this ideology ended up becoming organized criminals after the late 1800s. It was the same people that murdered Nicholas II, and McKinley. I've even witnessed them claiming to be religious, when there's not a religious bone in them, and they do not intend on living in a one-room farm house. In other words, they don't practice what they preach.
    1
  7225. 1
  7226. 1
  7227. 1
  7228. 1
  7229. 1
  7230. 1
  7231. 1
  7232. 1
  7233. 1
  7234. 1
  7235. 1
  7236. 1
  7237. 1
  7238. 1
  7239. 1
  7240. 1
  7241. ​ @BusbyTreeSurgery  Actually, it wasn't the Templars, but the "revived" Teutonic Order that claimed to have absorbed the Templars, which was a myth invented in what later became the German Confederation in 1815, by the Rite of Strict Observance, even though the real Templars still existed in Portugal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Christ_(Portugal) France is where everything changes, with the Jacobins. What became the Scottish Rite, in the US and UK, makes claim to the Templars, whereas the French, and much of Europe's irregulars, claims to be from the Teutonic Order myth, and this European branch is the root of Martinism. It is also one of the reasons why the European version, and why AMORC, is deemed "irregular." Original Freemasonry, which was founded in 1717 London, became an aristocratic movement about promoting its members to become educated at university. When it spread to France, later, and after the revolution, they bastardized it, making it fit their secular culture, and their line of "French haut grades Masonry" spread throughout Europe. They changed it, completely, from the 1st to the 3rd degrees, and added others, making 99; calling it the "Egyptian Rite." Worse, they had made it secular, and removed the belief in God. When this occurred, as well as becoming fed up with the French anarchists within it, the UGLoE stripped them of their warrant (charter). https://scottishrite.org/about/history/ The real roots of the Scottish Rite started as a side degree in London, known as the Scotch Masons’ degree. It was the French and Germans that added more to it. Anyhow, the version seen as regular to the UK and US does not contain the so-called Christian mysticism (Martinism). Though the regular branch alludes to ancient mysticism in passing, during the history lectures, it really teaches that the world is made up of several religions and cultures, which is taught at university. At the end, it also tells the true tale of the Templars, and their demise, as a warning, not the myth created around the Teutonic Order. Martinism, and the Teutonic Order myth, leads to the neo-Hinduism occult aspects seen in proto-fascism, and later, fascism and nazism. Himmler had latched onto this proto-fascist mysticism, and had learned of the Martinist's Vichy synarchy movement (1941). He had also been made aware of the ancient roots of religion and the Aryans. He wished to create a new Germanic religion, and though the basis was Martinism, just like the mystical beliefs of the proto-fascists, he also added a large dose of Germanic paganism, leading to Theosophy, Thule, and the Black Sun Society. There is as much difference between regular and irregular Freemasonry, as there is between white and black. Regular Freemasonry, from its founding in 1717, was mainly made up of Anglicans, and it is still Judaeo-Christian oriented today.
    1
  7242. 1
  7243. 1
  7244. Sarah Cooper; What's so unbelievable, is that this is revealed on credible websites, and in FBI documents that were released under FOIA requests. If people would only do a little research, they would find it. There's an online magazine called Jewish Magazine, with old articles written by credible journalists, which reveal the plot of the Muslims, known as Pan-Arabism, and a research website in Canada called Global Research, which reveals the one world government of the Trilateral Commission, the UN, and the EU, plus they cite experts on it all. By 1948, the Progressive Party was taken over by the California Communist Party, according to the FBI documents on the physicist Richard Feynman. That was the same party that Henry Wallace ran against Truman on. The party disbanded, and joined the Democratic Party, where they started taking control. If you'll remember, the Democrats called themselves progressives for a long time after that. By the time that JFK was in office, they fully controlled the DNC. It is probably the main untold reason why the Dixiecrats switched to the the GOP, and didn't rejoin the Democrats, after their party failed, as they knew what was happening. JFK nor Bobby would play along, and look what happened to them. The DNC had blackmail material on Johnson, who was about to be indicted, so they had a shill to put in JFK's place. What did Johnson do, he started the social programs of Welfare, or his "Great Society." Every Democrat since, and two Neocons, have added to their part of this socialist program, right up to Obama with Obamacare, and allowing the radical Muslims in. The Trilateral Commission exposed: http://www.globalresearch.ca/controlling-the-global-economy-bilderberg-the-trilateral-commission-and-the-federal-reserve/14614 The Grand Mufti and Hitler: http://www.jewishmag.com/116mag/chuckmorse/chuckmorse.htm http://www.jewishmag.com/175mag/farhud_arab_pogrom/farhud_arab_pogrom.htm Feynman's FBI documents (at bottom of page): https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2016/dec/13/richard-feynman-put-himself-fbis-do-not-call-list/
    1
  7245. 1
  7246. 1
  7247. 1
  7248. 1
  7249. 1
  7250. 1
  7251. 1
  7252. 1
  7253. 1
  7254. 1
  7255. 1
  7256. 1
  7257. 1
  7258. 1
  7259. 1
  7260. 1
  7261. 1
  7262. 1
  7263. 1
  7264. 1
  7265. 1
  7266. 1
  7267. 1
  7268. 1
  7269. 1
  7270. 1
  7271. 1
  7272. 1
  7273. The only way to stop globalism is to control the CEOs, boards, and stockholders of the many corporations that have offshored agriculture, manufacturing, mining, and drilling. To them, it has always been about profits, as they saw offshoring as a way to escape the labor unions and strict regulations of their home nations. Of course, some foods and minerals you will not be able to grow or mine, so, you'll have to import them. I could even see us adopting a tiered minimum wage system ranging from the unskilled bare minimum and upward according to one's skills and profession. That would make labor unions useless since they are one of the major groups used by the socialists to push their agenda. Instead of working with the unions, shut them down completely, and take over their pensions. Last, the younger generation must be taught that nothing is free and that they'll have to work for it. They also need to be taught what money is, how it is made, and how they're causing inflation by continually demanding more and more from the system. When inflation happens, the corporations only become richer, and generally, after about a year of increased wages, the corporations all raise their prices. It might be time to start capping what corporations can rake in, and capping wages with it. Social welfare needs to be capped as well, as it is bankrupting the state. The nanny state needs to be stopped. The wicked web of fiat currency is that when new money is printed, and it's injected into the system, people spend it, and the corporations' profit. Instead of those profits going back out into the system, the corporations invest and save, becoming richer, which then forces the government to sell more bonds to create more currency for the public. It's a never-ending and expanding cycle.
    1
  7274. 1
  7275. 1
  7276. 1
  7277.  @-haclong2366  "Colonialism is a practice by which a country controls people or areas, often by establishing colonies, generally for strategic and economic advancement. "Though colonialism has existed since ancient times, the concept is most strongly associated with the European colonial period starting with the 15th century, when some European states established colonising empires. At first, European colonising countries followed policies of mercantilism, aiming to strengthen the home-country economy, so agreements usually restricted the colony to trading only with the metropole (mother country). By the mid-19th century, the British Empire gave up mercantilism and trade restrictions and adopted the principle of free trade, with few restrictions or tariffs."__Wikipedia on Colonialism "Portugal began establishing the first global trade network and one of the first colonial empires under the leadership of Henry the Navigator. The empire spread throughout a vast number of territories distributed across the globe (especially at one time in the 16th century) that are now parts of 60 different sovereign states. Portugal would eventually control Brazil, territories such as what is now Uruguay and some fishing ports in north, in the Americas; Angola, Mozambique, Portuguese Guinea, and São Tomé and Príncipe (among other territories and bases) in the North and the Subsaharan Africa; cities, forts or territories in all the Asian subcontinents, as Muscat, Ormus and Bahrain (amongst other bases) in the Persian Gulf; Goa, Bombay and Daman and Diu (amongst other coastal cities) in India; Portuguese Ceylon; Malacca, bases in Southeast Asia and Oceania, as Makassar, Solor, Banda, Ambon and others in the Moluccas, Portuguese Timor; and the granted entrepôt-base of Macau and the entrepôt-enclave of Dejima (Nagasaki) in East Asia, amongst other smaller or short-lived possessions. "During its Siglo de Oro, the Spanish Empire had possession of Mexico, South America, the Philippines, all of southern Italy, a stretch of territories from the Duchy of Milan to the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Belgium, parts of Burgundy, and many colonial settlements in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Possessions in Europe, Africa, the Atlantic Ocean, the Americas, the Pacific Ocean, and East Asia qualified the Spanish Empire as attaining a global presence. From 1580 to 1640 the Portuguese Empire and the Spanish Empire were conjoined in a personal union of its Habsburg monarchs during the period of the Iberian Union, but beneath the highest level of government, their separate administrations were maintained. "Subsequent colonial empires included the French, English, Dutch and Japanese empires. By the mid-17th century, the Tsardom of Russia, continued later as the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union, and modern Russia, became the largest contiguous state in the world and remains so to this day."__Wikipedia on Colonial Empire Britain was a latecomer to the game, and the banning of slavery didn't occur until after 1800. No, Colonialism was about the history given above.
    1
  7278. 1
  7279. 1
  7280. 1
  7281. 1
  7282. 1
  7283. 1
  7284. 1
  7285. 1
  7286. 1
  7287. 1
  7288. 1
  7289. 1
  7290. 1
  7291. 1
  7292. 1
  7293. 1
  7294. 1
  7295. 1
  7296. 1
  7297. 1
  7298. 1
  7299. 1
  7300. 1
  7301. 1
  7302. 1
  7303. 1
  7304. 1
  7305. 1
  7306. 1
  7307. 1
  7308. 1
  7309. 1
  7310. 1
  7311. 1
  7312. 1
  7313. 1
  7314. 1
  7315. 1
  7316. 1
  7317. 1
  7318. 1
  7319. 1
  7320. 1
  7321. 1
  7322. 1
  7323. 1
  7324. 1
  7325. 1
  7326. 1
  7327. 1
  7328. 1
  7329. 1
  7330. 1
  7331. 1
  7332. 1
  7333. 1
  7334. 1
  7335. 1
  7336. 1
  7337. 1
  7338. 1
  7339. 1
  7340. 1
  7341. 1
  7342. 1
  7343. 1
  7344. 1
  7345. 1
  7346. 1
  7347. 1
  7348. 1
  7349. 1
  7350. 1
  7351. 1
  7352. 1
  7353. When the federal government came into being, (the centralized government of the US), the founding fathers never intended it to become what it has. If they had, there would not be the three branches of government, only one, and there would be no state and county governments. It would have been one large centralized government if they had intended on it being the tyrannical dictatorship that the socialist left wishes for. In fact, the founders cut the nation up into counties and states and divided up the central government to stop either branch from having more power than the other. The central government was created only for two things, the defense of the nation and a judiciary. Now, go back and look at the history of each administration. Over time, you will notice that it has been under presidents with a socialist slant, where more power has been given to the executive branch, regardless of political party. The worst of it started with the murder of William McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt replacing him. Who were the Roosevelts? Avid socialists going back to at least Clinton Roosevelt who supported Karl Marx. Teddy brought in progressivism, which is hidden socialism, then he formed the Bull Moose Party to keep the old conservative GOP from retaking control until Wilson did what he was selected to do. It has been a downhill socialist slide since then, controlled by the socialistic power elite, in both political parties, leading to a big brother central government with the executive branch having too much power. The states were hoodwinked out of their power, by the change in the Senate, and Congress, along with the judiciary, gave in over bribery, blackmail, and socialist slanted judges being selected. This is what has led us to today. Socialism has always been a scourge led by the power elite because they do not want to abide by any law while enforcing the law upon those in the lower classes. At the roots of socialism is an old Gnostic cult, that stated that they did not have to abide by the "Jewish law," and that they intended on taking the world back to the time of Eden when there was no law. It was a cult based upon sexual perversion and lawlessness called the Carpocratians of Alexandria, Egypt. It reared its ugly head up, again, during the early 1400s, in Bohemia, known as the radical Hussites, (Adamites, etc), at the start of the Reformation. That scourge spread worldwide, with the Unitarians, and today, it is known as socialism.
    1
  7354. 1
  7355. The left, today, is no different from the left (Jacobins) of the French Revolution, and their atheist Cult of Reason. What did they have then? A group of gullible but radical and violent anarchists, jealous of the new middle-class, who murdered the religious, and were controlled by a handful of the wealthy power elite. Even their leader, Robespierre, knew they had gone too far with their atheist cult, so he had the atheist leaders heads removed, and installed his Cult of the Supreme Being, based upon the "goddess of wisdom," (Cult of Isis), which wasn't much better. Robespierre was still a despot and tyrant just as were the early communists around him. These same Jacobins came to the US, and they became the first Democrats. They believed in a plantation ideology (commune) which is nothing but rebranded feudalism. Their ideology was no better than the Monarchy and the three estates that they replaced, which had the Roman Catholic Church at its head. This same atheist Jacobin socialist ideology, which was born in the universities, has been tried time and time again, under multiple despots, causing the genocide of hundreds of millions. What does the insane do? Try the same thing over and over again, but keep failing? These people are clinically, mentally ill, which is proven by their actions and their history. The closest thing to a free nation to have ever existed has been the United States, and the left wishes to destroy that. They have wanted to destroy it since its founding. In 1798, George Washinton wrote to the Sec. of War under Adams: "that you could as soon scrub the blackamoor white, as to change the principles of a professed Democrat; and that he will leave nothing unattempted to overturn the Government of this Country".
    1
  7356. 1
  7357. 1
  7358. 1
  7359. 1
  7360. 1
  7361. 1
  7362. 1
  7363. 1
  7364. 1
  7365. 1
  7366. 1
  7367. 1
  7368. 1
  7369. 1
  7370. 1
  7371. 1
  7372. 1
  7373. 1
  7374. 1
  7375. 1
  7376. 1
  7377. 1
  7378. 1
  7379. 1
  7380. 1
  7381. 1
  7382. 1
  7383. 1
  7384. 1
  7385. 1
  7386. 1
  7387. 1
  7388. 1
  7389. 1
  7390. 1
  7391. 1
  7392. 1
  7393. 1
  7394. 1
  7395. 1
  7396. 1
  7397. 1
  7398. 1
  7399. 1
  7400. 1
  7401. 1
  7402. 1
  7403. 1
  7404. 1
  7405. 1
  7406. 1
  7407. 1
  7408. 1
  7409. 1
  7410. 1
  7411. 1
  7412. 1
  7413. 1
  7414. 1
  7415. 1
  7416. 1
  7417. 1
  7418. 1
  7419. 1
  7420. 1
  7421. 1
  7422. 1
  7423. 1
  7424. 1
  7425.  @dannorris8478  Yes, they picked the socialist aspect up around 1880-90, if I recall, and it spread with certain denominations to several large cities, and the pastors were involved with the labor unions. Comey, who had admitted to once being a communist, was a follower of that belief, and McCain, HRC, and Carter followed the philosophy of the pastor that Comey did. If I put the man's name here, the post will be deleted, but it was Comey's Twitter moniker. People wonder why 45 demanded Comey's loyalty. I would say this answered it. The same people were behind the Lincoln Project. After the Civil War, though, they were already looking at changing the religious beliefs of the southern churches under the same denominations during the reconstruction, and, according to southern history scholars, these pastors told the government that they would change the minds of the people better than the soldiers could during reconstruction. One movement sort of turned into the other by the end of the century, though the movement failed in the south. Out of three colleges in NYC, (the major being Columbia U tied to the Trinity church in Manhattan), with the help of Dewey during the thirties, were where the Frankfurt School professors first settled, and the graduates became known as the New York Intellectuals (NYI and, the so-called anti-communist left, though they were really just anti-Stalinist), which were those of a "certain religion," along with some of the wealthy elite protestant class. All of them were progressives that believed in Trotskyism, (international socialism), and were trying to change their politics for what they wanted during that time. Needless to say, some from their group created the neocons. I have a very telling book about the entire movement published by Harvard U Press, titled: The Mighty Wurlitzer (2008). The author, Wilford, lays the history out bare. The book exposes PNAC, which was founded by the NYI, for the wars in the Middle-East. This was what was really behind the moral majority.
    1
  7426. 1
  7427. 1
  7428. 1
  7429. 1
  7430. 1
  7431. 1
  7432. 1
  7433. 1
  7434. 1
  7435. 1
  7436. 1
  7437. 1
  7438. 1
  7439. 1
  7440. 1
  7441. 1
  7442. 1
  7443. 1
  7444. 1
  7445. 1
  7446. 1
  7447. 1
  7448. 1
  7449. 1
  7450. 1
  7451. Of course they're not going to tell the truth, when they have been directed by a group of corrupt politicians, foreign nations, and a supra-national organization, since 2013. These are the very people that fully intended on handing over US sovereignty to the "liberal international order," based upon a new model, and worse, the US was to be at the head of it, if this corrupt cabal kept control. That is why they bet their lives on China. This has been long coming, starting with Eisenhower's international policy, which was kept classified for many years. However, it was Nixon that began to completely change it, and bring in China. From Nixon to Obama, they were all involved in it. Everybody blames Clinton for climate change. It was Nixon, who was behind the environmentalists, when he agreed to create Earth Day. Then came the propaganda about "smog in LA," and the Indian on TV. Worse, it was GHW Bush who signed the US up for climate change, and the UN agendas, at Rio, in 1992. That was the start of the Rio+20, and the UN agendas on sustainability. Bush, again, told them that the US would lead it. The Clinton administration, took it, and run with it. GHW Bush's NWO, which a handful of other presidents spoke of, is the G20, but mainly, the G7, which was started under Nixon as the Library Group, or the Group of Four. Britain, France, and Germany, all involved with the US, to create it at the White House. These are the very nations involved in the election interference, and spying on US citizens, today. They also perverted US intel under Nixon. Hello Mr. Kissinger. He knows what you've done.
    1
  7452. 1
  7453. 1
  7454. 1
  7455. 1
  7456. 1
  7457. 1
  7458. 1
  7459. 1
  7460. 1
  7461. 1
  7462. 1
  7463. 1
  7464. 1
  7465. 1
  7466. 1
  7467. 1
  7468. 1
  7469. 1
  7470. 1
  7471. 1
  7472. 1
  7473. 1
  7474. 1
  7475. 1
  7476. 1
  7477. 1
  7478. 1
  7479. 1
  7480. 1
  7481. 1
  7482. 1
  7483. 1
  7484. 1
  7485. 1
  7486. 1
  7487. 1
  7488. 1
  7489. 1
  7490. 1
  7491. 1
  7492. 1
  7493. 1
  7494. 1
  7495. 1
  7496. 1
  7497. After reviewing Vail's book, he speaks of the same myth about Templars in Scotland. In actuality, the two Rites start with a side-degree that started in London, around 1730, called the Scots Master degree, or the fourth degree. That spread to France. It was renamed the Royal Arch degree as England and Scotland were at war, again. The French added the other twenty-one degrees, making up twenty-five. That came to the US, and the Rite was taken over by Freemasons in South Carolina by 1800. There, the other eight degrees were added, and the others edited. In France, the esoteric knowledge of the two Rites was added, and it came from the Teutonic Knights in Germany, not the Templars, though they probably knew of it. The Masonic Authentic School, known as the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, has the correct history of Freemasonry and they have debunked many of these old authors, including Albert Pike, who believed the French account. A French Freemason, by the name of Andrew Michael Ramsay, spun a huge tale about the Templars, in order to coax the French nobility into joining this new order. In reality, the esoteric teaching came from Germany and the Teutonic Knights. Eastern Europe was a hotbed for Gnosticism and Mysticism, and Bohemia was a hub for it. Roman masonry and design came to Scotland by the late 10th century, before the Templars were founded. Later, some Templars fled to Scotland after the order was disbanded in 1312, but that was under Robert Bruce, who reigned from 1306 - 1329, and thirty-plus years before the life of Henry Sinclair (St. Claire), 1345  –  1400, and his myth. Roman Masonry, in Britain, is almost four hundred years older than this, thus, the Templar founding myth is hogwash. Templars bult nothing; they had several of the twenty-five colleges or guilds to do it. The craft and operative Masonry spread from the Scottish Lodges to Guilds in England and Wales. It is thought to have come to Scotland via traveling Freemasons (Masons allowed to travel freely by a pass from the pope or king) from Lombardy around Lake Como. That is where Constantine's twenty-five colleges or guilds settled as a headquarters while building the cathedrals and government buildings. That Roman knowledge was spread by the builders, which came to Scotland by around 950 CE at the earliest. As a lesson, don't believe everything you read, especially about this knowledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=Jt5xHnMUCtcC&pg=PA108&lpg=PA108&dq=Scots+Master+degree&source=bl&ots=khKc_1LWgg&sig=ACfU3U3Ki8JXZ49aVSQp7kziI6t-hVaapw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjertjAqfnlAhX5KDQIHdOXA1IQ6AEwEXoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=Scots%20Master%20degree&f=false
    1
  7498. From the Templar Code for Dummies, page 197: "France was a very sympathetic Catholic country, and there was a certain adolescent glee over playing host to the enemies of England. Annoying the English was a longstanding French pastime. The supporters of James became known as Jacobites, and there was a sizeable number of them. It is believed that modern Freemasonry came to France from Scotland with the Jacobites, and that it was these disaffected Scots and English who began to develop many of the appendant degrees. In spite of its name, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry actually began in France. "Chevalier Ramsay briefly was employed as a tutor to the exiled King James II’s two sons, and his many travels were turned into popular books. But he is most important to Freemasons for one document, known as Ramsay’s Oration. Whether Ramsay actually gave it as a speech in public is unknown, but his 1737 paper told a story about how Freemasonry began in the Holy Land and how its secrets were actually brought back to Europe by the crusading knights. He never said that the knights were the Templars — in fact, he actually credited the Knights of St. John. And he never suggested creating new degrees or introducing chivalric orders into the fraternity, but it didn’t matter. Creative Freemasons, mostly in France, took Ramsay’s ideas and ran with them. You can see the scale to which the new degrees can be attributed to these expatriate Scots in the term the French used to describe them — they were called the Ecossais degrees, French for 'Scottish.'” [sic] ==== "Our ancestors, the Crusaders, gathered together from all parts of Christendom in the Holy Land, desired thus to reunite into one sole Fraternity the individuals of all nations."__Ramsay's Oration. The Teutonic Knights were called The Order of Brothers of the German House of Saint Mary in Jerusalem. The Templars were called the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon. The Hospitallers were called the Order of Knights of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem. They all intermixed and were all associated with the Crusades. However, the Templars' organization was absorbed by the Hospitallers or the Order of St. John at the end. After the fall, they were the same thing, though a group of the Templars was protected in Portugal, which survived as the Military Order of Christ and the Supreme Order of Christ, today. However, the Gnostic esoteric knowledge was prevalent in Eastern Europe and the German Lodges promoted what came to France.
    1
  7499. 1
  7500. 1
  7501. 1
  7502. 1
  7503. 1
  7504. 1
  7505. 1
  7506. 1
  7507. 1
  7508. 1
  7509. 1
  7510. 1
  7511. 1
  7512. 1
  7513. 1
  7514. 1
  7515. 1
  7516. 1
  7517. 1
  7518. 1
  7519. 1
  7520. 1
  7521. 1
  7522. 1
  7523. 1
  7524. 1
  7525. 1
  7526. 1
  7527. 1
  7528. 1
  7529. 1
  7530. 1
  7531. 1
  7532. 1
  7533. 1
  7534. 1
  7535. 1
  7536. 1
  7537. 1
  7538. 1
  7539. 1
  7540. 1
  7541. 1
  7542. 1
  7543. 1
  7544. 1
  7545. 1
  7546. 1
  7547. 1
  7548. 1
  7549. 1
  7550. 1
  7551. 1
  7552. 1
  7553. 1
  7554. 1
  7555. 1
  7556.  @nunereclipsereborn  What we're seeing, right now, is state capitalism spreading everywhere. It is what was with fascist Italy and Germany, and in many other nations with nationalized corporations, or partial ownership of corporations. As a matter of fact, since 1900, the UK was one of the top nations with nationalized corporations. Under TARP, the US Government sees itself as a partial owner under the bailout. Read these four articles, though they are by Wikipedia: Nationalization List of nationalizations by country State capitalism State ownership For the US: 2009: Some economists consider the government's actions through the Troubled Asset Relief Program and the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act with regards to Citigroup to have been a partial nationalization.[84] Proposal was made that banks like Citigroup be brought under a conservatorship model similar to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that some of their "good assets" be dropped into newly created "good bank" subsidiaries (presumably under new management), and the remaining "bad assets" be left to be managed under the supervision of a conservatorship structure.[83] The government's actions with regard to General Motors in replacing the CEO with a government-approved CEO is likewise being considered as nationalization.[85][86] On June 1, 2009, General Motors filed for bankruptcy during the automotive industry crisis, with the government investing up to $50 billion in debtor-in-possession financing and taking 60% ownership in the company. In addition to a U.S. Government ownership, the Governments of Canada and Ontario also took ownership of 7.9% and 3.8% of General Motors, respectively.[87] President Barack Obama stated that the nationalization was temporary, saying, "We are acting as reluctant shareholders because that is the only way to help GM succeed." Citigroup is one of the leaders of the reset.
    1
  7557. 1
  7558. 1
  7559. 1
  7560. 1
  7561. 1
  7562. 1
  7563. 1
  7564. 1
  7565. 1
  7566. 1
  7567. 1
  7568. 1
  7569. 1
  7570. 1
  7571. 1
  7572. 1
  7573. 1
  7574. 1
  7575. 1
  7576. 1
  7577. 1
  7578. 1
  7579. 1
  7580. 1
  7581. 1
  7582. 1
  7583. 1
  7584. 1
  7585. 1
  7586. 1
  7587. 1
  7588. 1
  7589. 1
  7590. 1
  7591. 1
  7592. 1
  7593. 1
  7594. 1
  7595. 1
  7596. 1
  7597. 1
  7598. 1
  7599. 1
  7600. 1
  7601. 1
  7602. 1
  7603. 1
  7604. 1
  7605. 1
  7606. 1
  7607. penguins inadiorama: Well, it most assuredly did with the UK and France, as they were who cut up the Middle-East into nation states after WWI. The British had started the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1909, renamed the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in the thirties, which later became BP. The British and French made the states with agreements including the Russians. The Russians, though, were behind installing Mosaddegh in Iran, who nationalized AIOC, making the National Iranian Oil Company. They kicked the British out. The British went to Eisenhower, in the early fifties, and said that the US was welcome to join them in the oil, if the US would help to depose Mosaddegh. That was when Ike agreed, setting the US policy for the Middle-East, and sent in the CIA to pull off the coup, which started the first US backed proxy war. That US policy has been followed until now. It's all about who controls the energy resources, Europe, along with the US, or Asia (mainly Russia). Before that, US intel helped by giving info to its allies. After, we started backing, giving training, money, and arms to militants. The big lie, was that it was about spreading democracy, and human rights. In reality, it was about Europe using the US as their bully, via NATO, to take the gas and oil. By inviting in the US oil interests, the US would protect its assets too. However, in the Saudi's case, they wanted to keep out the Russian and Iranian influence, and it does have to do with the difference between the Sunni and Shiite. Pakistan was the same, which led to Afghanistan, during the last of Carter's term. Reagan inherited that, and it was expanded. Before that, we pitted Saddam against the Ayatollah, (Iraq Iran War), after the Shah fled. During WWII, Patton and Ike was questioning why the Brits wanted to keep the US in Africa and the Middle-East. It was all about the oil and gas. That, and they couldn't allow Germany to have it. If not for that, D-Day would have occurred much earlier. Now, it's about not allowing the Asians to have it. Anyhow, since then, the US and Europe has been using the Middle-East's own people to fight wars against people backed mainly by Russia. Thus, the people are the proxies in the wars. We trained and armed them, even though US citizens would consider them militant terrorists. Russia took over the militant socialists who the Nazis were training, and arming. It's been war ever since.
    1
  7608. 1
  7609. BLITZMASCHINE: It has nothing to do with that. The Europeans have been out of oil and natural gas for a long time, which is why Nazi Germany was in Northern Africa and heading toward the Levant during WWII.The British had oil wells already in Iran (the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co., now BP). That is why the US first became involved, to depose Mossadegh for the British under Eisenhower. The British promised Eisenhower access to oil also, as it was the UK and France who took the Ottoman land and divided it up into states, after WWI. The US put their wells on the Saudi's land, who ended up nationalizing the oil industry, but the US stayed with them. The US no longer needs the Saudis, and they know it. Russia took the Germans place in West Asia after WWII, and it has been a proxy war in the Middle-East ever since, trying to keep Russia out, so Europe has a supply of oil and gas. The Europeans use NATO to fight their wars. It wasn't until Nixon, that the US tied the dollar to oil, with an agreement between the US and OPEC to use the US dollar for oil payments. That is what Iraq was about. Afghanistan was about keeping Russia out, with a deal cut under Carter between the US, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan. They knew that if Russia took Afghanistan, Pakistan would be taken next, and eventually, the entirety of West Asia and Northern Africa. We do not fight Russia face to face, we use opposing ethnic groups in West Asia, and pit them against each other in war by proxy. We've been doing so since Eisenhower. It was the Eisenhower administration, who come up with the plan for the Middle-East. That plan was declassified and can be found in FOIA documents. The document states that the US would spread democracy throughout Asia, which is the actions of the NWO. The US has been leading the NWO since WWI, and especially after WWII. NATO was a treaty to appease Europe, stating that if they would not rearm, especially Germany, then NATO, led by the US, would protect them, and go to war. The US makes a profit from it, or the military-industrial complex does. The US sells all the NATO nations their arms and military equipment. The League of Nations, and later, the UN, are products of the NWO, which is a UK and US cabal of industrialists and international banks. It switched from spreading the British Empire worldwide, after WWI, to spreading democracy, with a takeover of world governments.
    1
  7610. 1
  7611. BLITZMASCHINE: The big money is the war debt itself. Every time that US boots are on the ground in the Middle-East, or elsewhere, Europe and the Saudis actually pays for a lot of that. There is a financing triangle there, which consists of the US, British, and Saudi banks, and they run the World Bank, the IMF, and BIS, and the Federal Reserve, along with the Bank of England, and the Rothschild banks throughout Europe. That is what was behind WWI and WWII. The NWO, or the "Cliveden set," aka the Roundtable Group, was a secret group of wealthy elite started by Cecil Rhodes, and later run by Lord Milner starting in 1902 after Rhodes' death, out of the All Souls College at Oxford. They founded a front group known as the Pilgrim's Society in 1902, and they stated that it was for US-UK relations. The group first intended on spreading British Imperialism worldwide and taking back the US. US bankers and industrialists joined that group during Wilson, but WWI happened, which they were behind starting.They financed Lenin, and sent him on his way to Russia, with a few million in cash, with the intent of the Germans marching in and easily taking Russia away from Lenin and the Communists after they had destabilized Russia, but that didn't happen. The Germans tried it twice, during both wars. The NWO is after Asia's natural resources. Anyhow, Britain owed the US a huge war debt over WWI, to the tune of $54 billion, and the US used that as leverage to take over the NWO (Milner's Group), where it switched from spreading British Imperialism to "US democracy." WWI was the death of the British Empire, and their war debt grew after WWII. Other allied European countries owed the US too. This same group financed the Nazi's rise to power, and people like Martin Borman was behind that. Hitler was merely a puppet. The Nazis had a "Black Book" that named the people in the Cliveden set, and they were intending on taking over the NWO if they had taken Britain. This same cabal of the wealthy elite was also behind Eisenhower's policy in Asia. WWII was actually another attempt at Asia, especially Russia, as the NWO does not care who they finance, or what wars they start, as long as their ends are met. They intended on letting Germany do the dirty work in Russia, and the US and its allies would then take Germany. This, in reality, is what the "special relationship" is all about. Almost every US President has been involved with the NWO since Woodrow Wilson, and they intend on installing a one world government, (the UN and EU sprang from that), or as the CFR/RIIA just called it, a "liberal world order," which they claim is now RIP over Trump. That article was just posted on the CFR's website. This is why they have fought Trump tooth and nail. That is what the TPP treaty and the Red Triangle treaty was all about. The NWO was behind Wilson's fourteen point plan, the Federal Reserve, and starting the League of Nations, which flopped. After WWII, the NWO started another front group known as the World Federalist Association, and they, along with the Pilgrims, pushed for the creation of the UN. The UN was to be the authority of the NWO. The Rockefeller family founded the Trilateral Commission under Nixon, to push the same thing, and that is also what the Bilderberg group is all about, along with many NGOs and thinktanks. It's the same cabal of wealthy elite behind all of it. This led to the creation of the EU, and they crawled into bed with ex-Nazis to found it. The one world government would be an undemocratic socialist synarchy form of government, with a world court and world law, very similar to what the EU is now. Professor Carrol Quigley, who taught Bill Clinton at Georgetown U., and was over the Foreign Service School, exposed the NWO in two academic history books. The books were not intended to be made public, but they were. Of course, the British have tried to deny it. The Rhodes scholarship is used to select individuals and pay for their education at Oxford. There, they are brought into the NWO. Other scholarships now fund the same thing, and it is now within several US universities and several college fraternities on campus (especially at Yale).
    1
  7612. Why are the left retarded?: One of these days, the people will awaken, and they will learn that the UK, the US, and Europe are being controlled by the world's largest mafia, ran by the most wealthy elite, who have no morals or scruples. If there is anything to make money on, legal or illegal, then they will do it. The brainchild behind the world cabal was Cecil Rhodes (in 1875) and his friends who had just dissolved the East India Company in 1874 (opium). Rhodes financing came from people such as Alfred Beit and N M Rothschild & Sons. After Rhodes death (1902) in 1926, "Ernest Oppenheimer, an immigrant to Britain and later South Africa who had earlier founded mining company Anglo American plc with American financier J.P. Morgan, was elected to the board of De Beers. He built and consolidated the company's global monopoly over the diamond industry until his death in 1957." The British called them the Cliveden Set and the Roundtable Group. The biggest den of US and British thieves and crooks to ever be partnered together, while calling themselves "Pilgrims." Don't you find it odd, that the British Roundtable Group, along with the Pilgrim's Society, and the World Federalists Association, still exists, and that the group of industrialists and international bankers controlling the EU is also known as the "Roundtable"? The same bankers in the Rhodes/Milner's group, now control the World Bank, the IMF, the BIS, and the financing of it all. How many of the bankers have been busted for money laundering, and helping to hide money offshore?
    1
  7613. 1
  7614. 1
  7615. 1
  7616. 1
  7617. 1
  7618. 1
  7619. 1
  7620. 1
  7621. 1
  7622. 1
  7623. 1
  7624. 1
  7625. 1
  7626. The EU is nothing but the successful creation of the Nazi's Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe), which had its roots in Kalergi's Pan-Europa and the Martinist Synarchy Movement, which is tied to the Jesuit Order and the Zionist/Donmeh. The elite clique of financiers, industrialists, and oilmen from the City of London and NYC, and within the CFR, the RIIA, the League of Nations, and the UN have been behind it all, since the start of the twentieth century (1901). The same elite clique within the US and Britain financed the Nazi's rise to power, and it was ex-Nazis who penned the trade treaties leading to the EU. Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law's book, "My Exploited Father in Law": “For a long time, I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the Council on Foreign Relations - One World Money group… Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support. The UN is but a long range, international banking apparatus neatly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One World Revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. The depression was caused by "the planned sudden curtailment of call money in Wall Street in the Fall of 1929, described for the uninformed public as "The Panic!"… Obviously, the real objectives of One-World Government leaders and their ever-close bankers, are most devious. They have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the United States of America, via the creation and establishment of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank." Woodrow Wilson: “Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it”. – Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913) "A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.” – Chapter 8 – Monopoly, or Opportunity? Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913) “We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world; no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”_chapter 9 – Benevolence, or Justice? Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913) The Federal Reserve was created on December 23, 1913, after earlier legislation failed. Founded by the same people. The Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) was created in 1920. Founded by the same people. The League of Nations was created on January 10th, 1920. Founded by the same people. The Council on Foreign Relations, the RIIA's sister, was created in 1921. Founded by the same people. The UN was established in 1945, but it was founded by the same people, and settled upon by FDR, Churchill, and Stalin in Tehran and Yalta. John F. Hylan: "The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states, and nation. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller–Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. "They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. "These international bankers and Rockefeller–Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection."__John F. Hylan, 1922 speech, former Mayor of New York City (1918-1925) Winston Churchill: "Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."__Winston Churchill, Zionism versus Bolshevism (1920). [Churchill distinguished between the good Jews, the ‘National Jews’ like those of Britain who were perfectly assimilated, or the Zionist Jews prepared to re-people their ‘home’ in Palestine, and the evil ‘International Jews’ (Winstonchurchill.org)]. When Churchill speaks of Jews, he isn't speaking of everyday Orthodox Judaism, but the European Jewish Conversos (Donmeh and Frankists), who would claim to convert to any religion, or become secular/atheist, in order to advance, and were in the banking industry, known as "Court Jews," along with being within the Jesuit Order since its founding. The Black Nobility and Venetian Banking. This is why the BIS and IOR are intimately entwined. Churchill leaves out their non-Zionist European counterparts, purposely, because it leads to the City of London, NYC, and Vatican City.
    1
  7627. 1
  7628. 1
  7629. 1
  7630. 1
  7631. 1
  7632. 1
  7633. 1
  7634. 1
  7635. 1
  7636. 1
  7637. 1
  7638. 1
  7639. 1
  7640. 1
  7641. 1
  7642. 1
  7643. 1
  7644. 1
  7645. 1
  7646. 1
  7647. 1
  7648. 1
  7649. 1
  7650. 1
  7651. 1
  7652. 1
  7653. When Rep. Banks spoke of the public suffering over China, take that back to the first protesters outside Trump Tower and in DC during 2017. It has always been the same cabal behind it, (the G20-UN/Wall St/China and friends), since the POTUS became the candidate. The POTUS formed the D10 over it. . Follow the actions of the DOJ, which silently indicted and arrested many since 2017, as well as creating the China Initiative, for which nobody was aware over the MSM. The MSM purposely did this to make the public think that the Trump administration was weak, while the friends of China and globalism tried to remove him. . Go back and look at the vote of the UN's human rights council about the Uyghurs. . "In October 2019, 23 countries including United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Canada, Japan, Australia and United States signed a joint letter to the UN Human Rights Council and UN General Assembly's Third Committee urging China to close the camps in Xinjiang." . "In November 2019, the Belarusian representative to the UN read a statement from 54 countries which they said were in support of China's Xinjiang policies. The signatories were Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, China, Comoros, the Congo, Cuba, North Korea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Iraq, Iran, Laos, Mauritania, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, the Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, the Philippines, Russia, Serbia, Sierra Leone, the Solomon Islands, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, the Sudan, Suriname, Syria, Togo, Uganda, the United Arab Emirates, Tanzania, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_re-education_camps#International_reactions . Now, since 2017, a second bill was introduced in Congress to remove the US from the UN. The nations within the last paragraph are no friend of the US, liberty, or democracy.
    1
  7654. 1
  7655. 1
  7656. 1
  7657. 1
  7658. 1
  7659. 1
  7660. 1
  7661. 1
  7662. 1
  7663. 1
  7664. 1
  7665. 1
  7666. 1
  7667. 1
  7668. Whoopi said that because she believes in fascism, and its parent, socialism. Proto-fascism was a product of socialism, where Mussolini was involved with those at the Free State of Fiume and D'Annunzio. Mussolini's history is very telling, and something very similar occurred in Germany as well, leading to their own brand of fascism. "Mussolini was originally a socialist politician and a journalist at the Avanti! newspaper. In 1912, he became a member of the National Directorate of the Italian Socialist Party (PSI), but he was expelled from the PSI for advocating military intervention in World War I, in opposition to the party's stance on neutrality." "Mussolini thought of himself as an intellectual and was considered to be well-read. He read avidly; his favorites in European philosophy included Sorel, the Italian Futurist, Marinetti, French Socialist, Hervé, Italian anarchist, Malatesta, and German philosophers Engels and Marx, the founders of Marxism. Mussolini had taught himself French and German and translated excerpts from Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Kant." "In 1913, he published Giovanni Hus, il veridico (Jan Hus, true prophet), an historical and political biography about the life and mission of the Czech ecclesiastic reformer Jan Hus and his militant followers, the Hussites. During this socialist period of his life, Mussolini sometimes used the pen name "Vero Eretico" ("sincere heretic")." D'Annunzio: "In 1881 D'Annunzio entered the University of Rome La Sapienza, where he became a member of various literary groups, including Cronaca Bizantina, and wrote articles and criticism for local newspapers. In those university years, he started to promote Italian irredentism." "D'Annunzio was associated with the Decadent movement in his literary works, which interplayed closely with French Symbolism and British Aestheticism. Such works represented a turn against the naturalism of the preceding romantics and were both sensuous and mystical. He came under the influence of Friedrich Nietzsche who would find outlets in his literary and later political contributions." "After the Fiume episode, D'Annunzio retired to his home on Lake Garda and spent his latter years writing and campaigning. Although D'Annunzio had a strong influence on the ideology of Mussolini, he never became directly involved in fascist government politics in Italy. In 1922, shortly before the march on Rome, he was pushed out of a window by an unknown assailant, or perhaps simply slipped and fell out himself while intoxicated. He survived but was badly injured, and recovered only after Mussolini had been appointed Prime Minister."
    1
  7669.  @occidentadvocate.9759  Nationalism and "socialist democracy" were really the only big differences between Fascism and Socialism. The Fascists began supporting the nation-state, which is what caused the rift between the two political ideologies. The rest, such as nationalizing industry, a hatred of the middle-class, central planning, and a large centralized authoritarian government were close to the same between the two. "Liberal opponents of both fascism and the Bolsheviks argue that there are various similarities between the two, including that they believed in the necessity of a vanguard leadership, had disdain for bourgeois values, and it is argued had totalitarian ambitions. In practice, both have commonly emphasized revolutionary action, proletarian nation theories, one-party states, and party-armies; however, both draw clear distinctions from each other both in aims and tactics, with the Bolsheviks emphasizing the need for an organized participatory democracy (Soviet democracy) and an egalitarian, internationalist vision for society based on proletarian internationalism, while fascists emphasized hyper-nationalism and open hostility towards democracy, envisioning a hierarchical social structure as essential to their aims. With the antagonism between anti-interventionist Marxists and pro-interventionist Fascists complete by the end of the war, the two sides became irreconcilable. The Fascists presented themselves as anti-communists and as especially opposed to the Marxists." Trotsky despised Stalin, calling him a nationalist because he wasn't trying to spread socialism internationally at that time. Trotsky didn't live to see Stalin and the takeover of Eastern Europe at the end of WWII, as Stalin had him topped. The sad thing is, we're still fighting this cancer today from both sides.
    1
  7670. 1
  7671. 1
  7672. 1
  7673. 1
  7674. 1
  7675. 1
  7676. 1
  7677. 1
  7678. 1
  7679. 1
  7680. 1
  7681. 1
  7682. 1
  7683. 1
  7684. 1
  7685. 1
  7686. 1
  7687. 1
  7688. 1
  7689. 1
  7690. 1
  7691. 1
  7692. 1
  7693. 1
  7694. 1
  7695. 1
  7696. 1
  7697. 1
  7698. 1
  7699. 1
  7700. 1
  7701. 1
  7702. 1
  7703. 1
  7704.  @johnp139  Ford built, in a co-op project, the huge GAZ (Gorky) automobile plant. GM was also there before the end, and so were others through the depression before that. They did this as they were building up Germany as well. "In May 1929, the Soviet Union signed an agreement with the American Ford Motor Company. Under its terms, the Soviets agreed to purchase $13 million worth of automobiles and parts, while Ford agreed to give technical assistance until 1938 to construct an integrated automobile-manufacturing plant at Nizhny Novgorod. The factory was founded and production started on 1 January 1932." "In 1929, due to a rapidly growing demand for automobiles and in cooperation with its trade partner, the Ford Motor Company, the Supreme Soviet of the National Economy established GAZ." Source: Wikipedia "Mikhail Gorbachev may know about this chapter of Soviet-American relations; the Soviet press and historians have publicly forgotten it. But in any case, Gorbachev seems determined to repeat it. Perestroika without American technical and managerial input is probably no more conceivable to him than was a socialist future without Fordism and Taylorism to Lenin. Likewise, many Americans do not know about one of the most remarkable episodes of technology transfer in history. The American engineers, architects, and industrialists who helped build the productive base of communist Russia swept the record under the rug. "In the 1920s the cream of American firms involved with automobiles, electricity, and workplace management were eager to sell the state of their art—give or take a few years—to the “Reds,” despite powerful anticommunist voices on the right. The Soviets were ready to buy, despite their aversion to capitalism. (They distinguished, as many Americans cannot even today, between America’s history-shaping means of production and our free-enterprise economic superstructure.) The United States had never enjoyed greater worldwide respect—or envy—than after World War I. The Soviets believed that the American system of production could consolidate the Bolshevik Revolution." Source: American Heritage: How America Helped Build The Soviet Machine
    1
  7705. 1
  7706. 1
  7707. 1
  7708. 1
  7709. 1
  7710. 1
  7711. 1
  7712. 1
  7713. 1
  7714. 1
  7715. 1
  7716. 1
  7717. 1
  7718. 1
  7719. 1
  7720. 1
  7721. 1
  7722. 1
  7723. 1
  7724. 1
  7725. 1
  7726. 1
  7727. 1
  7728. 1
  7729. 1
  7730. 1
  7731. 1
  7732. 1
  7733. 1
  7734. 1
  7735. 1
  7736. 1
  7737. 1
  7738. 1
  7739. 1
  7740. 1
  7741. 1
  7742. 1
  7743. 1
  7744. 1
  7745. 1
  7746. 1
  7747. 1
  7748. 1
  7749. 1
  7750. 1
  7751. 1
  7752. 1
  7753. 1
  7754. 1
  7755. 1
  7756. 1
  7757. 1
  7758. 1
  7759. 1
  7760. 1
  7761. 1
  7762. 1
  7763. 1
  7764. 1
  7765. 1
  7766. 1
  7767.  @2024magaman  There were more groups than that. The Whigs were from several groups, and some of the old Federalists were one of them. "During the 1790s, the first major U.S. parties arose in the form of the Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. After 1815, the Democratic-Republicans emerged as the sole major party at the national level but became increasingly polarized [during Madison's last two years]. A >nationalist< wing, led by Henry Clay, favored policies such as the Second Bank of the United States and the implementation of a protective tariff. A second group, the Old Republicans [Jeffersonians], opposed these policies, instead favoring a strict interpretation of the Constitution and a weak federal government." "The Whigs emerged in the 1830s [again, led by Henry Clay and Daniel Webster] in opposition to President Andrew Jackson, pulling together former members of the National Republican Party, the Anti-Masonic Party, and disaffected Democrats. The Whigs had some weak links to the defunct Federalist Party, but the Whig Party was not a direct successor to that party." Yet, they had the old Federalist's ideas. The "Whigs suffered a decisive defeat in the 1852 presidential election partly due to sectional divisions within the party. The Whigs collapsed following the passage of the Kansas–Nebraska Act in 1854, with most Northern Whigs eventually joining the Republican Party and most Southern Whigs joining the American Party and later the Constitutional Union Party. " All of this was stirred up under Madison after 1815, and after he "out-Hamiltons Alexander Hamilton" according to Rep. John Randolph of Virginia during that time. Guess why there's a huge concrete owl in a forest in California just outside San Francisco, where the GOP meets? The owl was the symbol of the Whig Party.
    1
  7768. 1
  7769. 1
  7770. 1
  7771. 1
  7772. 1
  7773. 1
  7774. 1
  7775. 1
  7776. 1
  7777. 1
  7778. 1
  7779. 1
  7780. 1
  7781. 1
  7782. 1
  7783. 1
  7784. 1
  7785. 1
  7786. 1
  7787. 1
  7788. 1
  7789. 1
  7790. 1
  7791. 1
  7792. 1
  7793. 1
  7794. 1
  7795. 1
  7796. 1
  7797. 1
  7798. 1
  7799. 1
  7800. 1
  7801. 1
  7802. 1
  7803. 1
  7804. 1
  7805. 1
  7806. 1
  7807. 1
  7808. 1
  7809. 1
  7810. 1
  7811. 1
  7812. 1
  7813. 1
  7814. 1
  7815. 1
  7816. 1
  7817. 1
  7818. 1
  7819. 1
  7820. 1
  7821. 1
  7822. 1
  7823. 1
  7824. 1
  7825. 1
  7826. 1
  7827. 1
  7828. 1
  7829. 1
  7830. 1
  7831. 1
  7832. 1
  7833. 1
  7834. 1
  7835. 1
  7836. 1
  7837. 1
  7838. 1
  7839. 1
  7840. 1
  7841. 1
  7842. 1
  7843. 1
  7844. 1
  7845. 1
  7846. 1
  7847. 1
  7848. 1
  7849. 1
  7850. 1
  7851. 1
  7852. 1
  7853. 1
  7854. 1
  7855. 1
  7856. 1
  7857. 1
  7858. 1
  7859. 1
  7860. 1
  7861. 1
  7862. 1
  7863. 1
  7864. 1
  7865. 1
  7866. 1
  7867. 1
  7868. 1
  7869. 1
  7870. 1
  7871. 1
  7872. When the US Government cut a deal with Nazis, bringing them into the US "to help fight communism," it was our biggest mistake. It wasn't long, that those very Nazis and Nazi sympathizers, (progressives on both sides of the aisle), cut deals and joined hands with card-carrying Communists within the Council on Foreign Relations and at Chatham House. About that same time, is when we start seeing things change inside the universities (the late nineties). We also witnessed the Neuordnung Europas turn into the EU. Which European country controls the EU? Germany? What is the Bilderberg Group? Reconcile. What is the POTUS fighting to remove today? "The Führer gave expression to his unshakable conviction that the Reich will be the master of all Europe. We shall yet have to engage in many fights, but these will undoubtedly lead to most wonderful victories. From there on the way to world domination is practically certain. Whoever dominates Europe will thereby assume the leadership of the world." — Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda, 8 May 1943 The treaties that led to the EU's creation started in 1945 resulting in the Maastricht Treaty of 1993. What if you were told that Germany has been working with Russia since 1945, and that they are backing the radical Islamic socialists in the Middle-East? Follow the German's history. Don't believe it? You'll need a translation engine for this, and most translator sites will purposely mistranslate Neuordnung (New Order) as reorganization. However, read The Situation of the USA, p. 285, and, The Future Policy of Germany, p. 320 from: http://vho.org/D/euw/index.html Define the "N" in NWO. The more you know.
    1
  7873. 1
  7874. 1
  7875. 1
  7876. 1
  7877. 1
  7878. 1
  7879. 1
  7880. 1
  7881. 1
  7882. 1
  7883. The truth about the creator God, ( The ALL, or Ein Soph), which is hidden in scripture by metaphor and allegory, is that the creator is the energy that the universe originates from, and is a part of. Some will argue that the universe isn't a part of it, but the very early religions thought it was, and that the gods and goddesses were created in the heavens (heavenly waters) before the planets, etc, from the universe. It's where one became two, a male and female, able to create. "Ein Sof, or Eyn Sof, (meaning "infinite", literally "without end"), in Kabbalah, is understood as God prior to any self-manifestation in the production of any spiritual realm, probably derived from Solomon ibn Gabirol's (c. 1021 – c. 1070) term, "the Endless One" (she-en lo tiklah). Ein Sof may be translated as "unending", "(there is) no end", or infinity. It was first used by Azriel (c. 1160 – c. 1238), who, sharing the Neoplatonic belief that God can have no desire, thought, word, or action, emphasized by it the negation of any attribute. Of the Ein Sof, nothing ("Ein") can be grasped ("Sof"-limitation). It is the origin of the Ohr Ein Sof, the "Infinite Light" of paradoxical divine self-knowledge, nullified within the Ein Sof prior to creation." Early kings were seen as demigods, and some were claimed to be the offspring of the gods and goddesses, which is where the divine right of kings originates. In Genesis, though apologists do their utmost to deny this, the word Elohim is plural, and can be clearly seen in the text. The Elohim were not the "creator" of the all, but born from it. Genesis 1:26: Then Elohim said, “Let us make humans in our image, in our likeness. Let them rule the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, the domestic animals all over the earth, and all the animals that crawl on the earth.” Note: "Let us," and "in our likeness." That is the polytheistic roots of all religion, which the apologists wish to distance themselves from. However, the Elohim are not the ALL or Ein Soph. It is known that from Mesopotamian texts, that Abraham was supposedly directed by the god Enlil to make his way to Palestine after Ur was destroyed by plague and war.
    1
  7884. 1
  7885. 1
  7886. 1
  7887. 1
  7888. 1
  7889. 1
  7890. 1
  7891. 1
  7892. 1
  7893. 1
  7894. 1
  7895. 1
  7896. 1
  7897. 1
  7898. 1
  7899. 1
  7900. 1
  7901. 1
  7902. 1
  7903. 1
  7904. 1
  7905. 1
  7906. 1
  7907. 1
  7908. 1
  7909. 1
  7910. 1
  7911. 1
  7912. 1
  7913. 1
  7914. 1
  7915. 1
  7916. 1
  7917. 1
  7918. 1
  7919. 1
  7920. 1
  7921. 1
  7922. 1
  7923. 1
  7924. 1
  7925. 1
  7926. 1
  7927. 1
  7928. 1
  7929. 1
  7930. 1
  7931. 1
  7932. 1
  7933. 1
  7934. 1
  7935. 1
  7936. 1
  7937. 1
  7938. 1
  7939. 1
  7940. 1
  7941. 1
  7942. 1
  7943. 1
  7944. 1
  7945. 1
  7946. 1
  7947. 1
  7948. 1
  7949. 1
  7950. 1
  7951. 1
  7952. 1
  7953. 1
  7954. 1
  7955. 1
  7956. 1
  7957. 1
  7958. 1
  7959. Mr. Webb, this is off topic, but I believe that you might be interested in this. DNA & the Origins of Peoples: The Armenians: https://youtu.be/etBNo0638Pw?t=1025 (Starts at end of introductions. At the Library of Congress 2014.) Website: https://www.loc.gov/item/webcast-6311 Pertinent history: Armenia, the Land of Noah: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgL2IKV8UB0 A trip to all corners of Armenia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6mQByAGGUs Georgia & The Great Caucasus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLXWC4enm_I Georgia - The Hidden Heart of the Caucasus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku-LCu7aWiM Notice the similarities between the myth of Noah and Promethius. In myth, Polyphemus (father of Celts and Gauls) supposedly lived beside Promethius on the mountain. On either side of the Caucasus were where farming and herding began, as the mountain ranges of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus, and southern Urals, holds the caves, as well as the paintings of the Auroch, of the early hunter-gatherers. I believe the Kurgan hypothesis more, as the northern side has more flat and fertile land, where recorded history leads to both sides of the Volga river, up to Samara. That is, supposedly, where the horse was tamed, and the wheel was invented. Also, I noted that a small ice age occurred at about 6200 BC (8.2-kiloyear event), which could have caused a migration. Some have claimed that the Caucasus Mountains weren't easily crossed, but the mountains could be bypassed along the shore of the Caspian Sea (Dagestan area), where the culture could easily spread south. The Black Sea side, not so easy, but a migration through Ukraine, and into Romania was very possible, which the Kurgan hypothesis shows. I also believe that this area was behind the myth of Dionysus, Bacchus, and Osiris (blood), which are tied to wine, vineyards, and agriculture. Georgia claims to have had the first vineyards and wine. Also, this agriculture was brought to the Nile. https://altaplaniciewines.wordpress.com/2014/09/15/wine-ancient-egypt/ None the less, many will not like these conclusions. Pay close attention to the history of both Armenia and Georgia, as well as where the R1 haplogroup migrated to (Africa).
    1
  7960. 1
  7961. 1
  7962. 1
  7963. 1
  7964. 1
  7965. 1
  7966. 1
  7967. 1
  7968. 1
  7969. 1
  7970. 1
  7971. 1
  7972. 1
  7973. 1
  7974. 1
  7975. 1
  7976. 1
  7977. 1
  7978. 1
  7979. 1
  7980. 1
  7981. 1
  7982. 1
  7983. 1
  7984. 1
  7985. 1
  7986. 1
  7987. 1
  7988. 1
  7989. 1
  7990. 1
  7991. 1
  7992. 1
  7993.  @forthfarean  Well, the communists have always been here, going back to the days that they had McKinley killed. They (every brand) were allowed to grow, and when they made a pile of money, by illicit means after prohibition by bootlegging, drugs, and gaming, they began their takeover, especially after their friends came here from Frankfurt and began teaching. The left wing had supporters of every kind of socialism, including Stalin and Soviet socialism. Some, during the thirties, all Trotsky supporters, broke away from the left, and infested the right. The GOP started taking them in, all to fight Stalin. That was the biggest mistake ever made, as they also had huge ties to the Levant, and the UK knows well what happened there. All those trials under McCarthy, and many got by with it. Only those supporting Stalin were really affected, while the Trotskyites roamed untouched. In 1952, they finally got into the GOP, at the top, with Nixon, when he was the VP. One of the most corrupt humans possible, and he was deep in the pockets of the Trotskyites, and their branch of the mob, by the time he became president. Watergate, after all, started over him taking money from them down in the Bahamas, and it expanded from there. The Bush family was involved as well, and LBJ was too. GHW Bush was Nixon's underling, and was involved in courting Mao in China. That's the dirty laundry of post-war American politics. Now, many of this Trotskyite lot became the Russian oligarchs, and the entire lot, worldwide, are pulling the strings of politicians in both parties, though after Trump and the House cleaning, its now more on the left.
    1
  7994. 1
  7995. 1
  7996. You have to remember the ideology and theology behind the fathers of the radical left, which were the Mystic's and Gnostic's Quietism and Perfectionism. Perfectionism as in "a doctrine holding that religious, moral, social, or political perfection is attainable, especially the theory that human moral or spiritual perfection should be or has been attained." They actually believed that they were perfect, and therefore could ignore any virtue or law, and feed their hedonism (the pursuit of pleasure and sensual self-indulgence.). "The Cathars' denial of the need for sacerdotal rites has been perceived as a form of quietism. Likewise, the twelfth and thirteenth-century Brethren of the Free Spirit, Beguines, and Beghards were all accused of holding beliefs with similarities to those condemned in the Quietist controversy. Among the ideas seen as errors (heretic), and condemned by the Council of Vienne (1311–12), are the propositions that humankind, in the present life, can attain such a degree of perfection as to become utterly sinless; that the "perfect" have no need to fast or pray, but may freely grant the body whatsoever it craves. This may be a tacit reference to the Cathars or Albigenses of southern France and Catalonia, and that they are not subject to any human authority or bound by the precepts of the church," or state. This is the root of Utopianism, and atheism, which originates in the east. It's why you always see the Silicon Valley techies running to their gurus, and why they hold those huge polyamorous sex parties like Bacchanalia. This perfectionist belief led to the Diggers in Britain, and those like Babeuf and Robespierre in France. These idiots live in a utopian dream world, and since the time of Babeuf, (who was jealous and corrupt), they believe that they can force their ideology on society as a whole, and use force (see the French Revolution, and the Second International's dogma). The Fabians are no better, as they intended on slipping socialism in, slowly, and hoping that nobody would notice.
    1
  7997. 1
  7998. 1
  7999. 1
  8000. 1
  8001. 1
  8002. 1
  8003. 1
  8004. 1
  8005. 1
  8006. 1
  8007. 1
  8008. 1
  8009. 1
  8010. 1
  8011. 1
  8012. 1
  8013. 1
  8014. 1
  8015. 1
  8016. 1
  8017. 1
  8018. Truth and fact: "Robert Alphonso Taft Sr. (September 8, 1889 – July 31, 1953) was an American conservative politician, lawyer, and scion of the Republican Party's Taft family. Taft represented Ohio in the United States Senate, briefly served as Senate Majority Leader, and was a leader of the conservative coalition of Republicans and conservative Democrats who prevented expansion of the New Deal. Often referred to as "Mr. Republican", he cosponsored the Taft–Hartley Act of 1947, which banned closed shops and other labor practices. "The elder son of William Howard Taft, the 27th President of the United States and the tenth Chief Justice of the United States, Robert Taft was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He pursued a legal career in Cincinnati after graduating from Harvard Law School in 1913. Along with his brother Charles Phelps Taft II, he co-founded the law partnership of Taft Stettinius & Hollister. Taft served in the Ohio House of Representatives from 1921 to 1931 and in the Ohio Senate from 1931 to 1933. Though he lost re-election in 1932, he remained a powerful force in state and local politics. "After winning election to the Senate in 1938 over incumbent Democrat Robert J. Bulkley, Taft repeatedly sought the Republican presidential nomination, often battling for control of the party with the moderate faction of Republicans led by Thomas E. Dewey. He also emerged as a prominent non-interventionist and opposed U.S. involvement into World War II prior to the 1941 Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor. Taft's non-interventionist stances damaged his 1940 candidacy, and the 1940 Republican National Convention nominated Wendell Willkie. Taft sought the presidency again in 1948, but he lost to Dewey at the 1948 Republican National Convention. He opposed the creation of NATO and criticized President Harry Truman's handling of the Korean War. "Taft again sought the presidential nomination a third time in 1952, and was widely viewed as the front-runner. However, Dewey and other moderates convinced General Dwight D. Eisenhower to enter the race, and Eisenhower narrowly prevailed at the 1952 Republican National Convention and went on to win the 1952 presidential election. Taft was elected Senate Majority Leader in 1953 but died of pancreatic cancer later that year. A 1957 Senate committee named Taft as one of America's five greatest senators, along with Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, John C. Calhoun, and Robert M. La Follette Sr." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Taft This was when the GOP was overtaken by the progressive neocons led by Dewey. This was also how it used to be, before they did so. Anti-entanglement, and anti-interventionist.
    1
  8019. 1
  8020. 1
  8021. 1
  8022. 1
  8023. 1
  8024. 1
  8025. 1
  8026. 1
  8027. 1
  8028. 1
  8029. 1
  8030. 1
  8031. 1
  8032. 1
  8033. 1
  8034. 1
  8035. 1
  8036. 1
  8037. 1
  8038. 1
  8039. 1
  8040. 1
  8041. 1
  8042. 1
  8043. 1
  8044. 1
  8045. 1
  8046. 1
  8047. 1
  8048. 1
  8049. 1
  8050. 1
  8051. 1
  8052. 1
  8053. 1
  8054. 1
  8055. 1
  8056. 1
  8057. 1
  8058. 1
  8059. 1
  8060. 1
  8061. 1
  8062. 1
  8063. 1
  8064. 1
  8065.  @nothankyou9906  Three things triggered WWI, Germany's expansionism, the Scramble for Africa, and Germany looking to get into the oil business in what became Iraq, and the oil in Baku. You are correct. The US and UK were converting their navies from coal to oil, and Germany wanted to do that as well. Thus, they began building the Baghdad Railway through the Ottoman Empire, which would also bypass the Suez Canal, giving them another trade route. That was one of the reasons why the Ottomans sided with Germany, and it led to their demise. The US and UK were trying to keep both Germany and Russia from expanding into the Middle-East over oil in both wars. It's why the African Campaign was important during WWII as well. This was what they called the "Great Game." The reasons told to most of the public only have a small modicum of truth to it. The League of Nations and the UN were created over one reason, to stop war over trade and the exploitation of natural resources by the western allies. They hoped that treaties would nip wars in the bud, but in reality, both supranational organizations were started by the US and UK over their "national interests." That is the Anglo-American Establishment, or "deep state." All the wars after WWII were about keeping Soviet and Russian influence north of a certain border, and away from the oil and gas business. In reality, then, it was about stopping Soviet expansionism, but they never mention the underlying reason. The Baath Party was aligned with the Communists and Soviets, and that led to Saddam's removal. It's why Assad was targeted as well, and Iran the same. Iran was where BP was born, when it was the Persian Empire.
    1
  8066. 1
  8067. 1
  8068. 1
  8069. 1
  8070. 1
  8071. 1
  8072. 1
  8073. 1
  8074. 1
  8075. 1
  8076. 1
  8077. 1
  8078. 1
  8079. 1
  8080. 1
  8081. 1
  8082. 1
  8083. 1
  8084. 1
  8085. 1
  8086. 1
  8087. 1
  8088. 1
  8089. 1
  8090. 1
  8091. 1
  8092. 1
  8093. 1
  8094. 1
  8095. 1
  8096. 1
  8097. 1
  8098. 1
  8099. 1
  8100. 1
  8101. 1
  8102. 1
  8103. 1
  8104. 1
  8105. Marin County, whose district in the House and Senate? Jared William Huffman, on the "environmental committee." Opposed legislation: Preventing Government Waste and Protecting Coal Mining Jobs in America – is a bill that would "amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to require state programs for regulation of surface coal mining to incorporate the necessary rule concerning excess spoil, coal mine waste, and buffers for perennial and intermittent streams published by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 12, 2008."[23] Huffman opposed the bill, arguing that it should be opposed because the supporters "believe coal companies should be allowed to blow the tops off mountains and dump the waste into streams, no matter what the science says about the consequence for our environment and the public health."[24] Water Rights Protection Act – a bill that would prevent federal agencies from requiring certain entities to relinquish their water rights to the United States in order to use public lands.[25] The bill was a reaction to the United States Forest Service's decision to pursue a "new regulation to demand that water rights be transferred to the federal government as a condition for obtaining permits needed to operate 121 ski resorts that cross over federal lands."[26] Huffman opposed the bill and accused the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power of being unnecessarily "adversarial" and having "unfairly vilified" the Forest Service after a committee hearing about the bill.[26] Committee assignments: Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Select Committee on the Climate Crisis Caucus memberships[edit] Congressional Progressive Caucus[27] Congressional Arts Caucus[28] Congressional Freethought Caucus
    1
  8106. 1
  8107. 1
  8108. 1
  8109. 1
  8110. 1
  8111. 1
  8112. 1
  8113. 1
  8114. 1
  8115. 1
  8116. 1
  8117. 1
  8118. 1
  8119. 1
  8120. 1
  8121. 1
  8122. 1
  8123. 1
  8124. 1
  8125. 1
  8126. 1
  8127. 1
  8128. 1
  8129. 1
  8130. 1
  8131. 1
  8132. 1
  8133. 1
  8134. 1
  8135. 1
  8136. 1
  8137.  @nicholasmorrill4711  Did it occur to you that he might be incorrect sometimes? Look into these articles at Wikipedia, which are well sourced: Building Back Better: "This article is about the United Nations program. For the slogan used by the 46th President of the United States, see Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign. "Building Back Better (BBB) is a strategy aimed at reducing the risk to the people of nations and communities in the wake of future disasters and shocks. The BBB approach integrates disaster risk reduction measures into the restoration of physical infrastructure, social systems and shelter, and the revitalization of livelihoods, economies and the environment." Atlantic Charter  Look for the history of how FDR screwed Britain over. The plan originated from Wilson's Fourteen Points, (League of Nations), which was also forced upon Britain, in Paris, after WWI, delaying the treaty. The UN was formed from this in 1945, and Eisenhower based his policy upon it, which was kept classified for many years, which every president, up to Obama, and possibly Trump, followed. The new economics and direction, though, started with Nixon, and the UN Earth Summits, which were designed to hide what they were doing. Earth Summits [Starts in 1972, and is the beginning of Agenda 21] Earth Summit Agenda 21 Culture 21 Sustainable Development Goals [Agenda 2030] The Shock Doctrine "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is a 2007 book by the Canadian author and social activist Naomi Klein. In the book, Klein argues that neoliberal free market policies (as advocated by the economist Milton Friedman) have risen to prominence in some developed countries because of a deliberate strategy of 'shock therapy".'" While I might not agree with everything Mrs. Klein states, as she is a far-left apologist, she is correct about the corporate shenanigans, and the laws passed during disasters. She coined the term: disaster capitalism. The shock doctrine was used by the US, and its allies, in areas of interest, especially where Russia tried to expand their influence. For example, she states that Iraq was over bringing in the Patriot Act, when, in fact, it was about removing the Baath Party, which was tied to communism, and Russia. However, Congress used 9/11 to bring in the Patriot Act, which would have been unacceptable beforehand, and Halliburton made a fortune. Next, go to the UN website, and read the agendas. They are not only about trade and security, but about everything we're now seeing, which they call "sustainable development." This includes race and the "many lettered people," as well as the green movement. Right now, what she wrote in her Intercept article, is taking place in the US.
    1
  8138. 1
  8139. 1
  8140. 1
  8141. 1
  8142. 1
  8143. 1
  8144. 1
  8145. 1
  8146. 1
  8147. 1
  8148. 1
  8149. 1
  8150. 1
  8151. 1
  8152. 1
  8153. 1
  8154. 1
  8155. 1
  8156. 1
  8157. 1
  8158. 1
  8159. 1
  8160. 1
  8161. 1
  8162. 1
  8163. 1
  8164. 1
  8165. 1
  8166. 1
  8167. 1
  8168. 1
  8169. 1
  8170. 1
  8171. 1
  8172. 1
  8173. 1
  8174. 1
  8175. 1
  8176. Don't you find it funny, that the left, who have always been the racists and white supremacists (KKK, Nazism and Fascism), will not own them, but started an alternate Communist group of violent and racist hatemongers, who claim that they're fighting against white supremacists, but those white supremacists are still left-wing? Make no mistake, Socialism, Marxism, Communism, Nazism, and Fascism, are all left-wing ideologies. Every one of them grew out of French utopian socialism and anarchists, which Marx bastardized into his form of anti-capitalist Communism. Nazism and Fascism all had an amount of the same anti-capitalist socialism within them, just as did Communism. There's no denying it, as anyone can pick up a book on political history or science, and read about their origins. In other words, ANTIFA are fighting against people who have the same beliefs and ideology as they do; the people on the left. There is no right-wing to it, they're lying about it! If you don't believe that, then read Karl Marx's writing, especially his Communist Manifesto, then compare that to the Nazi's Twenty-Five Point Plan, and the Fascist Manifesto. All three groups are radical and racist anti-capitalists, are anti-bourgeois, are socialist, are collectivist, are pro-welfare, are for nationalizing business and banks, are for the redistribution of wealth, are against property ownership, and are antisemitic, thus blaming the Jews for capitalism. The farthest left are the Communists (who ANTIFA claims to be), then Nazism a close second, with the last, Fascism. Last, look up the history of the KKK. It was a racist organization, started in Tennessee, by Democrats, to fight the reconstruction, fight republicanism, and be the terrorist arm of the Democrats, in order to keep black politicians out of government.
    1
  8177. 1
  8178. 1
  8179. 1
  8180. 1
  8181. 1
  8182. 1
  8183. 1
  8184. 1
  8185. 1
  8186. 1
  8187. 1
  8188. 1
  8189. 1
  8190. 1
  8191. 1
  8192. 1
  8193. 1
  8194. 1
  8195. 1
  8196. 1
  8197. 1
  8198. 1
  8199. It would also do many well to read about what destroyed the 1944 Bretton-Woods Agreement, which threw the US into its ever escalating trade imbalance, with increasing taxes. Do I hear "Great Society" socialism, and increased spending in Vietnam, over Johnson escalating it into a war, anyone? That was also why Nixon had to terminate the convertibility of the US dollar to gold, as soon as he was elected, because we could no longer peg the dollar to it, and he wanted to prune back the new social programs. We had already lost most of the gold, while the left's socialism caused skyrocketing taxes, which caused manufacturing to flood out of the country, or just close its doors. Since then, it's been increasing taxes and regulation by the left, which is why you see Made In China on all the products on the store's shelves. The Nixon Shock: "A negative balance of payments, growing public debt incurred by the Vietnam War and Great Society programs, and monetary inflation by the Federal Reserve caused the dollar to become increasingly overvalued.[41] The drain on US gold reserves culminated with the London Gold Pool collapse in March 1968.[42] By 1970, the U.S. had seen its gold coverage deteriorate from 55% to 22%. This, in the view of neoclassical economists, represented the point where holders of the dollar had lost faith in the ability of the U.S. to cut budget and trade deficits. "In 1971 more and more dollars were being printed in Washington, then being pumped overseas, to pay for government expenditure on the military and social programs. In the first six months of 1971, assets for $22 billion fled the U.S. In response, on 15 August 1971, Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, unilaterally imposing 90-day wage and price controls, a 10% import surcharge, and most importantly "closed the gold window", making the dollar inconvertible to gold directly, except on the open market. Unusually, this decision was made without consulting members of the international monetary system or even his own State Department, and was soon dubbed the Nixon Shock." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system#Nixon_Shock The article is spot on. Read ""Memorandum of discussion, Federal Open Market Committee" (PDF). Federal Reserve." Inflation is caused by too much money being in circulation, and inflation devalues the dollar. The amount of money in circulation is what controls it all.
    1
  8200. 1
  8201. 1
  8202. 1
  8203. 1
  8204. 1
  8205. 1
  8206. 1
  8207. 1
  8208. 1
  8209. 1
  8210. 1
  8211. 1
  8212. 1
  8213. 1
  8214. 1
  8215.  @Adolf_Meowtler  "The United States system of units of 1832 is based on the system in use in Britain prior to the introduction to the British imperial system on January 1, 1826. Both systems are derived from English units, a system which had evolved over the millennia before American independence, and which had its roots in both Roman and Anglo-Saxon units. "The customary system was championed by the U.S.-based International Institute for Preserving and Perfecting Weights and Measures in the late 19th century. Some advocates of the customary system saw the French Revolutionary, or metric, system as atheistic. The president of an Ohio auxiliary of the Institute wrote that the traditional units were "a just weight and a just measure, which alone are acceptable to the Lord". His organization later went so far as to publish music for a song proclaiming "down with every 'metric' scheme". "The U.S. government passed the Metric Conversion Act of 1975, which made the metric system "the preferred system of weights and measures for U.S. trade and commerce". The legislation states that the federal government has a responsibility to assist industry as it voluntarily converts to the metric system, i.e., metrification. This is most evident in U.S. labeling requirements on food products, where SI units are almost always presented alongside customary units. According to the CIA Factbook, the United States is one of three nations (along with Liberia and Myanmar) that have not adopted the metric system as their official system of weights and measures." [SIC] Wiki article The metric system came about over Robespierre's rule, where they also changed their calendar system. Henri de Saint-Simon was one of those revolutionaries, and he and Pierre Leroux were the ones who coined the term socialism and created the idea of that form of government, which included mandatory (forced) labor for everyone. "At the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789, Saint-Simon quickly endorsed the revolutionary ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity. In the early years of the revolution, Saint-Simon devoted himself to organizing a large industrial structure in order to found a scientific school of improvement. He needed to raise some funds to achieve his objectives, which he did by land speculation. This was only possible in the first few years of the revolution because of the growing instability of the political situation in France, which prevented him from continuing his financial activities and indeed put his life at risk. Saint-Simon and Talleyrand planned to profiteer during the Terror by buying the Cathedral of Notre-Dame, stripping its roof of metal, and selling the metal for scrap. Saint-Simon was imprisoned on suspicion of engaging in counter-revolutionary activities. He was released in 1794 at the end of the Terror." "Saint Simon's conceptual recognition of broad socio-economic contribution, and his Enlightenment valorization of scientific knowledge, soon inspired and influenced utopian socialism, liberal political theorist John Stuart Mill, anarchism through its founder Pierre-Joseph Proudhon who was inspired by Saint-Simon's thought and Marxism with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels identifying Saint-Simon as an inspiration to their ideas and classifying him among the utopian socialists. Saint-Simon's views also influenced 20th-century sociologist and economist Thorstein Veblen, including Veblen's creation of institutional economics that has included prominent economists as adherents." [SIC] Wiki article
    1
  8216. 1
  8217. 1
  8218. 1
  8219. 1
  8220. 1
  8221. 1
  8222. 1
  8223. 1
  8224. 1
  8225. 1
  8226. 1
  8227. 1
  8228. 1
  8229. 1
  8230. 1
  8231. 1
  8232. 1
  8233. 1
  8234. 1
  8235. 1
  8236. 1
  8237. 1
  8238. 1
  8239. 1
  8240. 1
  8241. 1
  8242. 1
  8243. 1
  8244. 1
  8245. 1
  8246. 1
  8247. 1
  8248. 1
  8249. 1
  8250. 1
  8251. 1
  8252. 1
  8253. 1
  8254. 1
  8255. 1
  8256. 1
  8257. 1
  8258. 1
  8259. 1
  8260. 1
  8261. 1
  8262. 1
  8263. 1
  8264. 1
  8265. 1
  8266. 1
  8267. 1
  8268. 1
  8269. 1
  8270. 1
  8271. 1
  8272. 1
  8273. 1
  8274. 1
  8275. 1
  8276. 1
  8277. 1
  8278. 1
  8279. 1
  8280. 1
  8281. 1
  8282. 1
  8283. 1
  8284. 1
  8285. 1
  8286. 1
  8287. 1
  8288. 1
  8289. 1
  8290. 1
  8291. 1
  8292. 1
  8293. 1
  8294. 1
  8295. 1
  8296. 1
  8297. 1
  8298. 1
  8299. 1
  8300. 1
  8301. 1
  8302. 1
  8303. 1
  8304. 1
  8305. 1
  8306. 1
  8307. 1
  8308. 1
  8309. 1
  8310. 1
  8311. 1
  8312. 1
  8313. 1
  8314. 1
  8315. 1
  8316. 1
  8317. 1
  8318. 1
  8319. 1
  8320. 1
  8321. 1
  8322. 1
  8323. 1
  8324. 1
  8325. 1
  8326. 1
  8327. 1
  8328. You will find that the idea of socialism and communism is ancient, and can be traced back to the 2nd century CE Gnostics in Alexandria, Egypt and the Levant. The Borborites, Sodomites, Ophites,, Sethianism, Valentinianism, etc, known as "libertine Christian Gnostic sects," had a communal and Edenist ideology because they were immoral and perverted scofflaws/criminals, and did not want to obey what they called the "Jewish law." As a matter of fact, these Edenists wanted to take the world back to the time of Eden, where they claimed that there was no law. It is tied to the Cult of Isis and the Imperial Cult of Rome, as well as the Greek Rite of Passage (pederasty and the hare) and the Pythagorean Cult. https://www.mega.nu/ampp/eden/occult.html After the formation of the Roman church as the state religion, there were crusades against the heretics, where the Gnostic groups would flee or go underground. The ideology made its way to Greece and Rome, and through Eastern Europe. It finally rose again in the 1400s to stay, in Bohemia, as the Adamites, Orebites, and Taborites (radical Hussites), which is the start of socialism and unorthodox religion becoming mainstream. In Poland, it became Socinianism, the start of socialism under the "Unitarians." Unorthodox sects of both Christianity and Judaism spread socialism worldwide, especially the Moravian Church and the Methodist, as well as the Sabbatean/Frankists. This ideology was spread to North America, by the unorthodox churches, before the US was formed. If you study what the Borborites believed, you will find it being practiced today by some in California and New York. They call it "art." Who do you think is behind Antifa? What goes on in the underground gay/S&M community? Also, see the OTO and Equinox.
    1
  8329. 1
  8330. 1
  8331. 1
  8332. 1
  8333. 1
  8334. 1
  8335. 1
  8336. 1
  8337. 1
  8338. 1
  8339. 1
  8340. 1
  8341. 1
  8342. 1
  8343. 1
  8344. 1
  8345. 1
  8346. 1
  8347. 1
  8348. 1
  8349. 1
  8350. 1
  8351. 1
  8352. 1
  8353. 1
  8354. 1
  8355. 1
  8356. 1
  8357. 1
  8358. 1
  8359. 1
  8360. 1
  8361. 1
  8362. 1
  8363. 1
  8364. 1
  8365. 1
  8366. 1
  8367. 1
  8368. 1
  8369. 1
  8370. 1
  8371. 1
  8372. 1
  8373. 1
  8374. 1
  8375. 1
  8376. 1
  8377. 1
  8378. 1
  8379. That's not quite right. There were several sects of Jews, and the Pharisees sect, which Jesus of the Nazarene was of, did not believe in a fallen angel, and still do not to this day. The word, satan, means adversary, or one who blocks man's progress, a stumbling block. Thus, in Job, satan was not the angel's name, but was what he did, acting as an adversary to Job. The angel's name is unknown. One needs to read the Jewish Encyclopedia article about Satan, to understand this. The fallen angel myth originated in Persia, with the Zoroastrian story, it is thought. Zoroaster, though, was not philosophizing about two Gods fighting, but the left and right or bad and good of the soul or consciousness. The ability of man to do both good and evil, using his mind. Later, this was changed into two Gods, in a never ending battle, and the Persians labeled their enemies as either worshiping or being possessed by this anti-God. This was brought into the Levant, when they captured the land, and was the basis of the first version of Enoch, which mainstream Judaism, and the RCC, states is a myth, and is apocryphal. The Essene sect of Judaism did start to believe in this myth. Thus, Paul believed in it, along with the Greco-Roman myth of Hades being the God of the underworld, along with the story about Zeus slaying Typhon, and casting him to Hades. This became the Christian Satan. Somewhere along the way, scribes capitalized the word, satan, and removed the word "the," from the front of it, as the Tanakh generally has it as "ha-satan" or "the satan," for the adversary. Mainstream Judaism, that of the Pharisees, believes that man is the satan, as man is born a with a mind that is a clean slate, and has free will. The soul carries on the duality of nature, in that man is both good and bad, as is God (Isaiah 45:7). Mans soul is a part of God (the All), as it lives in or strives with man (Genesis 6:3). The Garden of Eden story, is a retold and modified story from ancient Mesopotamia. The snake in the tree is a metaphor, as the snake symbol has always signified knowledge, thus the tree is the tree of knowledge. Man, after partaking from the tree, instead of the tree of life (ignorant about death), found the awful truth (knowledge) that he would die one day. That separates man from beast. The word, lucifer, was never satan. It's usage in both Jesus and the King of Babylon, was to show that both rose in renown quickly, and died at an early age, as Venus appears just before sunrise, and fades away with the sun (rising and falling quickly). Jewish Encyclopedia, for Isaiah 14:12 and the Latin word, lucifer (Hebrew: Helel ben Shahar).: "Septuagint translation of "Helel [read "Helal"] ben Shahar" (= "the brilliant one," "son of the morning"), name of the day, or morning, star, to whose mythical fate that of the King of Babylon is compared in the prophetic vision (Isaiah 14:12-14 ). It is obvious that the prophet in attributing to the Babylonian king boastful pride, followed by a fall, borrowed the idea from a popular legend connected with the morning star and Gunkel ("Schö pfung und Chaos," pp. 132-134) is undoubtedly correct when he holds that it represents a Babylonian or Hebrew star-myth similar to the Greek legend of Phaethon. The brilliancy of the morning star, which eclipses all other stars, but is not seen during the night, may easily have given rise to a myth such as was told of Ethana and Zu: he was led by his pride to strive for the highest seat among the star-gods on the northern mountain of the gods (comp. Ezekiel 28:14 Psalm 48:3 [A.V:2]), but was hurled down by the supreme ruler of the Babylonian Olympus. Stars were regarded throughout antiquity as living celestial beings ( Job 38:7 )". [sic] Also, Lucifer, at the Catholic Encyclopedia: (Hebrew helel; Septuagint heosphoros, Vulgate lucifer) The name Lucifer originally denotes the planet Venus, emphasizing its brilliance. The Vulgate employs the word also for “the light of the morning” (Job 11:17), “the signs of the zodiac” (Job 38:32), and “the aurora” (Psalm 109:3). Metaphorically, the word is applied to the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:12) as preeminent among the princes of his time; to the high priest Simon son of Onias (Ecclesiasticus 50:6), for his surpassing virtue, to the glory of heaven (Apocalypse (Revelation) 2:28), by reason of its excellency; finally to Jesus Christ himself (2 Peter 1:19; Apocalypse (Revelation) 22:16; the “Exultet” of Holy Saturday) the true light of our spiritual life." [sic] I quote Elaine Pagels, PhD, from her book, “The Origin of Satan,” 1995: In biblical sources, the Hebrew term, “the satan” [ha-satan], describes an adversarial role. It is not the name of a particular character. Although Hebrew storytellers, as early as the sixth century B.C.E., occasionally introduced a supernatural character, whom they called “the satan”; what they meant, was any one of the angels sent by God, for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity. Pagels PhD in religion is from Harvard, and she teaches it at Princeton. I quote Rabbi Tovia Singer, on the subject of satan: "Although this well-known Christian doctrine has much in common with the pagan Zoroastrian Persian dualism from which it spawned, it is completely alien to the teachings of the Jewish Scriptures. In fact, this Christian notion that [the] Satan, in an act of outright defiance, ceased to function as God had intended him to, suggests that God created something imperfect or defective". Next, I quote Rabbi Dr. Raymond Apple: "The word Satan figures in the Hebrew Bible, but not as a proper name. As a noun it denotes an adversary; as a denominative verb, to oppose or obstruct or be hostile. It is sometimes used in a human sense; in Psalm 109:6, for instance, it suggests the counsel for the prosecution in a court of law. "It does not begin to have a superhuman sense until late in the Biblical period; in Zechariah 3 and the Book of Job it is applied to the prosecutor in the heavenly court. But even in this sense, Satan is not a demon. At best, he is one of the celestial beings, but it may be that the word is merely a colorful metaphor and does not imply that there is any actual being with that name. Nor is Satan opposed to God. At worst, he is simply a devil’s advocate drawing God’s attention to things that appear to be wrong. "Kaufmann Kohler’s theory, in his “Jewish Theology”, chapter 31, is that just as the serpent in the creation story “represents the evil inclination which arises in man with his first consciousness of freedom”, so Satan is an allegorical [fictional] figure “representing the evil of the world, both physical and moral”. "In post-Biblical Jewish sources there are very few references to Satan, and those that are found have no dogmatic or authoritative significance. Satan continues to represent the impersonal force of evil; thus, the Tosefta Shabbat advises that one should “not go on a journey with a wicked man, because Satan accompanies him”. In Jewish liturgy the few references to Satan are all impersonal, for instance the evening prayer that God may remove the adversary “from before us and behind us”, and the morning prayer for protection from “the destroying adversary”. "Popular lore has a far stronger notion of Satan deriving from the New Testament. There he not only personifies the spirit of evil but assumes an independent personality hostile to Jesus and to God. As a result, Milton, writing in an age when people regarded Satan as the presiding demon in stark opposition to God, was able, at least in the first two or three books of “Paradise Lost”, to draw a sympathetic picture of Satan and turn him into almost an epic hero. "For Judaism, all this goes much too far." Last, from Dr. Helen Bond: "There's no kind of prince of darkness; somebody who stands in opposites to God. Throughout most of the texts, there's no concept at all of an evil force"__Dr. Helen Bond, MTheol PhD, Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland. Quote from "The History Of The Devil".
    1
  8380. 1
  8381. 1
  8382. 1
  8383. 1
  8384. 1
  8385. 1
  8386.  @drgoremd  From The Guardian: Quote. Andrew Waller, a former British diplomat who worked with Khalil at the UK office for Syria, a diplomatic mission housed inside the British embassy in Beirut, described Khalil as a thoughtful individual and highly valued colleague during his government service. “This is a naked example of the US administration arresting someone for their political opinions, and I think the British government should be exercised about this,” he said. “He is a former British government employee who was vetted and well liked.” Waller added that the British government was entirely dependent on non-British nationals working at embassies worldwide to provide the language skills and local knowledge needed to operate. Khalil worked for years on the British government’s flagship grant programme that brings foreign students to study at UK universities, as well as in a support role for which he helped to inform and shape British foreign policy on Syria through his knowledge and Arabic skills. “The British government relies on people like Mahmoud all over the world,” he said. “Without them the UK could not operate overseas. It could not conduct diplomatic activity without this raft of employees who do this kind of work.” Waller said he was “disappointed” that Khalil’s loyalty to the government he served for years has not been publicly recognised by the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office. The Foreign Office declined to comment, saying it did not discuss former employees. “There is an element of loyalty here that is really important: If there is one thing Mahmoud showed while working for the British government, it is loyalty,” said Waller. End Quote.
    1
  8387. 1
  8388. One has to laugh at the politicians, such as Warren, when they blame the wealthy since the wealthy fund their campaign. This is the same lie uttered by the left since the French Revolution. Why Warren is angry, as well as the others on the left, is that they are jealous of the wealthy and those that made it, but don't want to work for it, just as they were in revolutionary France, or, in Warren's case, they want to become wealthier by using their political clout. What do you know of Gracchus Babeuf, the first Communist? Babeuf's father was a CO in the French military, who was a traitor that switched sides to Austria. At wars end, he lost his wealth, and Gracchus, his son, suddenly couldn't lounge around anymore. He also had to take care of his parents on top of his own family. Gracchus became enraged that he had to work for a living, and became jealous of those who still had wealth, over his father's actions. Gracchus is the classic case of an entitled rich boy, who suddenly found himself no longer rich. What about Marx and Engels, who were both Babeufians? Engels was from a wealthy family. Marx was also but was lazy, and his father, an attorney, cut him off. Both Marx and Engels would get drunk on the Sabbath and harass churches. Marx made many claims as to why he couldn't work, but the truth was, there was nothing wrong with him. He was lazy and jealous. Engels was just plain diabolical and wanted to use Communism to make greater wealth by running a new government, much like Warren. Marx, it is believed, was also taking orders from a banker who married his second cousin, in London, to write propaganda for the press.
    1
  8389. 1
  8390. 1
  8391. 1
  8392. 1
  8393. 1
  8394. 1
  8395. 1
  8396. 1
  8397. 1
  8398. 1
  8399. 1
  8400. 1
  8401. 1
  8402. I wonder if the public realizes that it is very wealthy socialists, who are practicing capitalists, that control the Democratic Party, Bernie's radicals, and the CPUSA? Not only do they control the CPUSA, they control and fund what people think of as co_mmunism around the world. The people in control are wealthy elite snobs (banking, insurance, stock market), at Wall Street and London. In fact, Occupy Wall Street was payed for by this very elite lot, residing at Wall Street itself, with many claiming that they're Democrats or Progressives. It has been this way since 1900 when the Rhodes' roundtable groups came to be. In fact, this is the CFR and RIIA lot. Some of the "Bernie Bros" of the sixties found out, and there were riots. That is why Malcolm X was killed, and several other's lives were destroyed.These radical idiots, like the Bernie Bros and Antifa, are fighting against the very people that pay for and run their cause (Rockefellers, Soros, etc). It is an elitist scam and protection racket used to bring about international socialism (world government / Federalism), and to protect their manufacturing and slavery in Asia, which they moved there to start with. Bernie's Bros are supporting the very people that took their good jobs. Bernie's lot are the paid trouble-makers and rioters used as an excuse to change law. From above and from below. I'm waiting for these idiots to wake up and see that they were conned in a huge way. The fight between Bernie and Warren is staged; a school play. It was this way, the other day, with the protesters showing up at a Pelosi speech. The sad part is, there are people naive and dumb enough to believe it.
    1
  8403. 1
  8404. 1
  8405. 1
  8406. 1
  8407. 1
  8408. 1
  8409. 1
  8410. 1
  8411. 1
  8412. The DNC has never been one for rules (Boss Tweed, Tammany Hall, etc). That is how Truman became VP at the last minute, during a convention, but of course that was a good thing, as the incumbent VP was a radical communist. It doesn't say much about FDR, nor the party, for picking Henry Wallace to start with. However, FDR's administration was filled with them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_Democratic_Party_vice_presidential_candidate_selection It seems that the Democratic Party has had a similar problem on their hands during the last several presidential elections. COINTELPRO was designed to keep them out, but the Democrats had its teeth pulled, via the Church Committee, and loaded up the FBI's counterintelligence with socialists. To be honest, I believe this to have been going on since GHW Bush became president, if not before. Since 1992, the same globalist plan has been pushed by every president, except Trump. Two Bushes, a Clinton, and an Obama, all the same beasts. In 1992, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) was held in Rio. "In 1992, the first conference of its kind, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), commonly referred to as the Rio Conference or Earth Summit, succeeded in raising public awareness of the need to integrate environment and development. The conference drew 109 heads of state to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to address what were dubbed urgent problems of environmental protection and socio-economic development. The Earth Summit influenced subsequent UN conferences, including Rio+20 and set the global green agenda. 'The World Conference on Human Rights, for example, focused on the right of people to a healthy environment and the right to development; controversial demands that had met with resistance from some Member States until the Earth Summit.'" The US was sold out during this event. This is why they tried to keep Trump out, as the TPP would have closed the deal. Trump canned the TPP during January, 2017. 2022 is to be their next meeting, and everything was supposed to be implemented by 2021. They've held an agenda meeting every ten years since 1992. 2012 was another year, and that was when Obama and his fellow socialists started pulling off their antics by repealing Smith-Mundt. Fake news was born. The SJWs, and their MSM supporters, started then.
    1
  8413. 1
  8414. 1
  8415. 1
  8416. 1
  8417. 1
  8418. 1
  8419. 1
  8420. 1
  8421. 1
  8422. 1
  8423. 1
  8424. 1
  8425. 1
  8426. 1
  8427. 1
  8428. 1
  8429. 1
  8430. 1
  8431. 1
  8432. 1
  8433. 1
  8434. 1
  8435. 1
  8436. 1
  8437. 1
  8438. 1
  8439. 1
  8440. 1
  8441. 1
  8442. 1
  8443. 1
  8444. 1
  8445. 1
  8446. 1
  8447. 1
  8448. 1
  8449. 1
  8450. 1
  8451. 1
  8452. 1
  8453. 1
  8454. 1
  8455. 1
  8456. 1
  8457. 1
  8458. 1
  8459. 1
  8460. 1
  8461. 1
  8462. 1
  8463. 1
  8464. 1
  8465. 1
  8466. 1
  8467. 1
  8468. 1
  8469. 1
  8470. 1
  8471. 1
  8472. 1
  8473. 1
  8474. 1
  8475. 1
  8476. 1
  8477. The Democrats will resort to anything, in order to stay out of jail, and the left-wing press will continue to cut their own throats. Remember this, those who really "colluded" are those who accused Trump of collusion. U1, Russian Reset, the Ukraine, money laundering, offshore banking, and the Russian Mafia. Remember Chuck Schumer having a donut and coffee with Putin at a new Russian filling station in New York? Remember the gasoline tax scam that was perpetrated by the Sicilian and Russian Mafia in New York? What districts did Schumer represent? New York's 10th congressional district, which is beside the district for Brighton Beach? Nadler also represents it and Weiner was also of that district. Imagine that. "Before his [Schumer's] election to the Senate, Schumer served in the House of Representatives from 1981 to 1999, first representing New York's 16th congressional district before being redistricted to the 10th congressional district in 1983 and 9th congressional district in 1993. A native of Brooklyn and graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, he was a three-term member of the New York State Assembly from 1975 to 1980." Follow the districts and their representatives. 9th District: "Prior to 2013, the district consisted primarily of middle-class white neighborhoods, including large Jewish, Italian, Irish, and Russian populations, in southern Brooklyn and south central Queens." What district is Harlem in, and who has an office there? WJC? Who has attacked Trump from day one? Why is Giuliani Trump's attorney? Who did Giuliani prosecute? Who are the five families?
    1
  8478. 1
  8479. 1
  8480. 1
  8481. 1
  8482. 1
  8483. 1
  8484. 1
  8485. 1
  8486. 1
  8487. 1
  8488. 1
  8489. 1
  8490. 1
  8491. 1
  8492. 1
  8493. 1
  8494. 1
  8495. 1
  8496. 1
  8497. 1
  8498. 1
  8499. 1
  8500. 1
  8501. 1
  8502. 1
  8503. 1
  8504. 1
  8505. 1
  8506. 1
  8507. 1
  8508. 1
  8509. 1
  8510. 1
  8511. 1
  8512. 1
  8513. 1
  8514. 1
  8515. 1
  8516. 1
  8517. 1
  8518. 1
  8519. 1
  8520. 1
  8521. 1
  8522. 1
  8523. 1
  8524. 1
  8525. 1
  8526. 1
  8527. 1
  8528. 1
  8529. 1
  8530. 1
  8531. 1
  8532. 1
  8533. 1
  8534. 1
  8535. 1
  8536. 1
  8537. 1
  8538. 1
  8539. 1
  8540. 1
  8541. 1
  8542. 1
  8543.  @theicepickthatkilledtrotsk658  The Anglo-American Establishment's internationalists essentially created the USSR and the PRC. Both times, western manufacturers poured in, and built up their manufacturing and energy sectors while taking advantage of the greedy and corrupt politicos wants at the top of each government. Western economists went into the USSR to write their first five year plans. Essentially, they created both nations to be slave labor workhouses for cheap goods, and forced the industrial revolution on them. The Russians sold every ounce of grain that they could produce to invest more into industry, which caused the genocide. It was stoked by the fear of Germany invading after WWI. Stalin slipped his leash during WWII, so the establishment quickly set their sights on using Mao. The establishment had put everything into motion by the early seventies under Nixon. While building up the PRC, they used the Russian mob (that became the oligarchs), as well as certain figures within their government who were in the pocket of the US, to undermine the nation, and they found their time to strike come when the USSR invaded Afghanistan after the 1978 coup. Afghanistan had old alliances with the US in opium going back to the Opium War days. They used Afghanistan to create their version of Vietnam for the Russians. When it was collapsing, it was the corrupt people who had become the oligarchs that took over under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and they were backed by the Anglo-American Establishment. Slavery in the west never ended; the establishment just moved it east. Worse, some want to turn the US into an amoral and corrupt oligarch run nation much like Russia is run today, while others want to turn it into another communist China.
    1
  8544. 1
  8545. 1
  8546. 1
  8547. 1
  8548. 1
  8549. 1
  8550. 1
  8551. 1
  8552. 1
  8553. 1
  8554. 1
  8555. 1
  8556. 1
  8557. 1
  8558. 1
  8559. 1
  8560. 1
  8561. 1
  8562. 1
  8563. 1
  8564. 1
  8565. 1
  8566. 1
  8567. 1
  8568. 1
  8569. 1
  8570. 1
  8571. 1
  8572. 1
  8573. 1
  8574. 1
  8575. 1
  8576. 1
  8577. 1
  8578. 1
  8579. 1
  8580. 1
  8581. 1
  8582.  @Ashtor1337  Do you think that collectivist and centralizationist Nationalism, which is Federalism, isn't targeting Europe, as well as the world at the moment? Do you think that Communism, Socialism, and Progressivism were really separated from that? Do you know about the World Federalist Movement inside the UN? Do you know who the two women were that founded the movement? Hard leftists. I've read the history, as well as studied the anti-Aristotelian, Hamiltonian and Hobbesian nationalist philosophy that led to it all. It's what changed the US completely in 1865, where Marx was writing to his pen pal, Lincoln, as Greeley published Marx's screeds in his New York newspaper. The reconstruction was a brainwashing and occupation campaign used to destroy conservative Aristotelian and Jeffersonian Republicanism, which favored small and sovereign states. The "republicans" of Lincoln weren't made up of Jefferson's people; they were "Unionist" Whigs and Federalists. All Collectivists, and Centralizationists tied to banking and manufacturing. The Civil War was called Lincoln's French Revolution brought to US soil, which was all about expansion and money, and many scholars have called Lincoln a dictator, comparing him to Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Hitler, and the list goes on. Trotsky, later on, has much to do with the US side of it, as he was teaching his Marxian philosophy in NYC, at a social science school, before he met up with Lenin. There have been several books and articles published on this very subject, which were authored by several scholars of history in both the US and Europe. This factual history is also being taught in several colleges at this very moment.
    1
  8583. 1
  8584. 1
  8585. 1
  8586. 1
  8587. 1
  8588. 1
  8589. 1
  8590. 1
  8591. 1
  8592. 1
  8593. 1
  8594. 1
  8595. 1
  8596. 1
  8597. 1
  8598. 1
  8599. 1
  8600. 1
  8601. 1
  8602. 1
  8603. Socialists do not understand capital nor capitalism. One must keep investing money for the corporation to operate. Capital (relating to or being assets that add to the long-term net worth of a corporation) comes from corporate money and/or bank loans. That money is called capital expenditure, capital investment, and capital reinvestment. The salaries of the CEO and stockholders are paid from the profits of what is being manufactured or grown. The corporation is another person (a legal invisible entity), compared to the stockholders and CEO. If the business is unincorporated, capitalism still works in a similar manner, without the invisible entity. The socialist's problems are jealousy and greed, nothing more. They want those extra dollars being paid as salaries to the owner(s), as well as what is within the company's bank account. They do not care if the company collapses, and they surely do not understand competition in the free market, which keeps product prices low. Although, I do agree that some CEO's salaries are exorbitant, which damages the company, and you really see this in nationalized companies under socialist governance. Because of the Soviet Union's socialist policies, the capital invested in their first manufacturing plants was never continued. Buildings and machinery wear out. When the Soviet state fell, their industrial machinery was worn out, and that machinery was within old buildings that were falling apart. The politicians, who controlled these state-run corporations, at the top, took all the profits for themselves and the state, instead of reinvesting. Venezuela is another prime example. The socialist's nationalization (thievery) ideology is old, going back to the French Revolution. A revolutionary leader, Georges Danton, is a good example of the socialist's thievery and skulduggery. "The most serious accusation, which haunted him [Danton] during his arrest and formed a chief ground for his execution, was his alleged involvement with a scheme to appropriate the wealth of the French East India Company. During the reign of the Old Regime, the original French East India Company went bankrupt. It was later revived in 1785, backed by royal patronage. The Company eventually fell under the notice of the National Convention for profiteering during the war. The Company was soon liquidated while certain members of the Convention tried to push through a decree that would cause the share prices to rise before the liquidation. Discovery of the profits from this insider trading led to the blackmailing of the directors of the Company to turn over half a million livres to known associates of Danton." Sound familiar today?
    1
  8604. 1
  8605. 1
  8606. 1
  8607. 1
  8608. 1
  8609. 1
  8610. 1
  8611. 1
  8612. 1
  8613. 1
  8614. 1
  8615. 1
  8616. 1
  8617. 1
  8618. 1
  8619. 1
  8620. 1
  8621. 1
  8622. 1
  8623. 1
  8624. 1
  8625. It's not foreign business coming in to rape and pillage China, then just pay the government off, though these foreign corporations do receive cheap labor. The Chinese government owns many corporations, and those that come in are controlled by the CCP, mainly by stock purchase, which is a requirement. China runs on State Capitalism, (nationalization, partial ownership, etc), and have since Mao. The big lie, told about the Soviet Union and China by the west, is that they were/are communists against capitalism. In reality, both nations supported the worst form of it, the dark sibling of laissez-faire capitalism, that gives capitalism a bad name. What nation, in reality, has openly nationalized the most corporations? Britain? The Soviet Union and China are just advanced forms of that ideology. Also, note what the US Govt has done since 1917. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nationalizations_by_country State Capitalism is what the globalists and UN have been pushing for, and the US has been trying to slowly slip in, since WWII. The Eisenhower Policy, that was confidential for many years, states that the purpose was to push "international capitalism" around the globe. That policy was pushed through to Obama. It is also why a handful of corporations and banks run the roundtable that controls the EU. "State capitalism is an economic system in which the state undertakes commercial (i.e. for-profit) economic activity and where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor and centralized management), or where there is otherwise a dominance of corporatized government agencies (agencies organized along business-management practices) or of publicly listed corporations in which the state has controlling shares. Marxist literature defines state capitalism as a social system combining capitalism with ownership or control by a state—by this definition, a state capitalist country is one where the government controls the economy and essentially acts like a single huge corporation, extracting the surplus value from the workforce in order to invest it in further production. This designation applies regardless of the political aims of the state (even if the state is nominally socialist). Many scholars argue that the Soviet Union and the countries modeled after it, including Maoist China, were state capitalist systems. Many scholars also argue that the current People's Republic of China constitutes a form of state capitalism. "As a term, state capitalism is also used by some in reference to a private capitalist economy controlled by a state—that is, a private economy that is subject to statist economic planning. This term has been used to describe the controlled economies of the Great Powers in the First World War. Alternatively, state capitalism may refer to an economic system where the means of production are privately owned, but the state has considerable control over the allocation of credit and investment, as in the case of France during the period of dirigisme after the Second World War. Other examples include the economies of Denmark, Norway and Sweden which have almost equal mixtures of private and state ownership. These countries have enough state ownership and regulation to be legitimately labeled forms of democratic state capitalism. Theoretically, a system that has complete state ownership of the economy but is democratic would be called democratic state capitalism. Systems where an authoritarian state has full control of the economy are called authoritarian state capitalist systems. An existing example of this type of system would be North Korea. "State capitalism has also come to be used sometimes interchangeably with state monopoly capitalism to describe a system where the state intervenes in the economy to protect and advance the interests of large-scale businesses. Noam Chomsky, a libertarian socialist, applies the term 'state capitalism' to economies such as that of the United States, where large enterprises that are deemed "too big to fail" receive publicly funded government bailouts that mitigate the firms' assumption of risk and undermine market laws, and where private production is largely funded by the state at public expense, but private owners reap the profits. This practice is in contrast with the ideals of both socialism and laissez-faire capitalism. "There are various theories and critiques of state capitalism, some of which existed before the 1917 October Revolution. The common themes among them identify that the workers do not meaningfully control the means of production and that capitalist social relations and production for profit still occur within state capitalism. In Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1880), Friedrich Engels argued that state ownership does not do away with capitalism by itself, but rather would be the final stage of capitalism, consisting of ownership and management of large-scale production and communication by the bourgeois state. He argued that the tools for ending capitalism are found in state capitalism." "After the October Revolution, Lenin used the term positively. In spring 1918, during a brief period of economic liberalism prior to the introduction of war communism and again during the New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921, Lenin justified the introduction of state capitalism controlled politically by the dictatorship of the proletariat to further central control and develop the productive forces: 'Reality tells us that state capitalism would be a step forward. If in a small space of time we could achieve state capitalism, that would be a victory.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism
    1
  8626. 1
  8627. 1
  8628. 1
  8629. 1
  8630. 1
  8631. There is a group of people, some now very wealthy, and who are in the computing industry, which have decided to overturn all societial norms, including the idea of right and wrong. Of course, this idea is much older, and can be found within the early psychiatrists from 1945, such as Dr. George Brock Chisholm, a Canadian psychiatrist, and the first director of the WHO. Banning certain words from being muttered is only one tooth of the giant bull gear within their machine. Quoting the Canadian Encyclopedia about Dr. Chisholm: "Chisholm’s public platform had grown since the mid-1930s, through his lectures and speeches. He had also earned a reputation for courting controversy, which peaked in 1945 with his remarks in several speeches on parenting, education and morality. That October, in New York, his lecture on peace to the William Alanson White Foundation drew calls for his resignation from Cabinet ministers and more than 20 non-governmental organizations. Chisholm had attacked traditional morality and religious teachings for instilling guilt, fear and prejudice in children. In his view, these teachings produced immature adults incapable of free, rational thought and ultimately bound for war. Not all objected to his opinions: some journalists, prominent psychiatrists and the faculty of Queen’s University came to his defence [sic] over the White Foundation lecture. "The solutions Chisholm proposed for world peace could be authoritarian. In his 1945 acceptance speech for the Albert A. and Mary Woodward Lasker Award from the US National Committee for Mental Hygiene, Chisholm proposed that, as a short-term solution, a world police force could help keep peace by destroying any nation that started war. [Here, think NATO] "In November 1945, Chisholm delivered some of his most famous remarks in a speech to parents at the Rockliffe Home and School Association in Ottawa. The theme was similar to that of his speech the previous month: traditional approaches to child-rearing made world peace impossible. To make his point, he attacked the tradition of teaching children to believe in Santa Claus: “'Any man who tells his son that the sun goes to bed at night is contributing directly to the next war… Any child who believes in Santa Claus has had his ability to think permanently destroyed… Can you imagine a child of four being led to believe that a man of grown stature is able to climb down a chimney… that Santa Claus can cover the entire world in one night distributing presents to everyone! He will be a man who has ulcers at 40, develops a sore back when there is a tough job to do, and refuses to think realistically when war threatens.'” ====== Quoting Chisholm: "Conscience is what your mother told you before you were six years old.”__Brock Chisholm "What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of which we know anything? The only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality - the concept of right and wrong. The re-interpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all of psychotherapy.”__Brock Chisholm "...the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.”__Brock Chisholm
    1
  8632. 1
  8633. 1
  8634. 1
  8635. 1
  8636. 1
  8637. 1
  8638. 1
  8639. 1
  8640.  Leocardia Emanuel  I'll have to find the book, it's here, somewhere, but the Bailey's company did pay for that, whether it was just the interior, etc, I'm not sure. The idea came from Russell. They supposedly worked with Hammarskjöld, the designer. There were a lot of politicos and wealthy elite involved with Bailey's group, and their publishing company publishes for the UN. The original room was by the Laymen's Home Missionary Movement. (Charles Taze Russell). Then we have Robert Muller. "Robert Muller (b. 1923) joined the United Nations in 1951, soon after its birth. He was the assistant to three Secretary-Generals. He was director of the Secretary-General’s Office and director of the UN Economic and Social Council (UNESCO). "The Robert Muller School World Core Curriculum Manual (1986) was published by the Lucis Publishing Company. The preface says: “'The underlying philosophy upon which the Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey, by the Tibetan teacher, Djwhal Khul.'" Below is from a search, for their website, which I'm banned from, BTW. "Good Will, Ethical Responsibility & the Sustainable. "From the opening address to World Goodwill Seminar, UN Headquarters, Geneva. ... The United Nations HQ in New York has a so called Meditation Room dedicated to ... in for example the movie “Tomorrow”6, which has also been published as a book. ... Discipleship in the New Age, 1955, Alice A. Bailey, Lucis Press, NY."
    1
  8641.  Leocardia Emanuel  Bailey's claim was, believe it or not, was that Freemasonry was the world's oldest religion. That is a crock of bull, as the fraternity was founded in 1717. However, this is what the Bailey's believed, and wanted to create a world religion, hoping that the fraternity would change back, somehow, to antiquity. She was from Britain, after all. The Mormons, did, create a religion from it. Martinism was created in Europe from it, as well. What the Masonic fraternity is actually for, is to open one's eyes to the world, and it's many different religions and cultures. It teaches one to study them, (comparative religion), which is known as taking the Pilgrim's Path. It doesn't mean to join them, as the fraternity is based upon Judaeo-Christianity, but it's about learning the different cultures. The other lessons are becoming a moral man, no matter your religion, and to promote secondary education. In the Grand Orient Lodges, in Europe, the belief in God is unnecessary. In the US and UK, it is required. A Lodge is set up sort-of similar to a parliament, inside, and works similar to one, for business, which teaches those skills. Union halls got their idea from this, as, after all, Freemasonry would have been the world's oldest labor union, not a religion. It was created from the older guilds. Blavatsky promoted a similar idea as Bailey, as she claimed to have visited a few Lodges in Europe. However, her beliefs were in eastern theology. That became a fad, after Europe began trading with the east. There's actually a religion, based upon these eastern teachings, in Israel, about worshiping the Bab, tied to the Shiites. Their temple is of Greek architecture, and looks awful similar to the buildings in DC. They also want a world religion, promote the UN, and they're into the green movement, etc. Look into Babism, the Alawites, and the Druze.
    1
  8642. 1
  8643. 1
  8644. 1
  8645. The Epoch Times had an article about Rosenstein, where Rosenstein insinuated that what he signed, and what was given to the court, weren't the same. He insinuated that what he read, in the document, was different than what was presented to the court. This can be traced back to Obama, Brennan, and bad actors in both the DNC and GOP. The Progressives, or the Old Guard faction, which are within both political parties. Quoting Wikipedia: "The Old Guard faction was an organized group in the Socialist Party of America (SPA) that sought to retain the organization's traditional orientation towards electoral politics by fighting the Militant faction of generally-younger party members who factionally organized to promote greater efforts at direct action in advancing the cause of revolutionary socialism. "The Old Guard had its roots as the "Regulars" in the inner party factional war of 1919, which resulted in the fragmentation of the Socialist Party into the Communist Party of America and Communist Labor Party of America. In 1935, the personal and political friction between the Old Guard and the Militants (and their "Progressive" allies) led to an organizational split, with the Old Guard faction leaving to establish the Social Democratic Federation (SDF)." "The Old Guard and their Militant foes both hailed from the broad Marxist tradition, the former seeing democracy as a positive value in itself and emphasizing the efficacy of the electoral road to power while the latter tended to see democracy as a sort of chimera, a tactical expedient propagated by the bourgeois in its maintenance of class power. Beyond this important analytical difference, the divide between these two factional groupings was largely generational, with the Old Guard dominated by middle aged party veterans of large standing while newcomers into the Socialist Party during the Depression years of the early 1930s tended to gravitate as a younger and more aggressive caucus."
    1
  8646. 1
  8647. 1
  8648. 1
  8649. 1
  8650. 1
  8651. 1
  8652. 1
  8653. 1
  8654. 1
  8655. 1
  8656. 1
  8657. 1
  8658. 1
  8659. 1
  8660. 1
  8661. 1
  8662. 1
  8663. 1
  8664. 1
  8665. 1
  8666. 1
  8667. 1
  8668. 1
  8669. 1
  8670. 1
  8671. 1
  8672. 1
  8673. 1
  8674. 1
  8675. 1
  8676. 1
  8677. 1
  8678. 1
  8679. 1
  8680. 1
  8681. 1
  8682. 1
  8683. 1
  8684. 1
  8685. 1
  8686. 1
  8687. 1
  8688. 1
  8689. 1
  8690. 1
  8691. 1
  8692. 1
  8693. 1
  8694. 1
  8695. 1
  8696. 1
  8697. 1
  8698. 1
  8699. 1
  8700. 1
  8701. 1
  8702. I wouldn't go so far as to call the pope a commie, though he is supportive of them. The pope is a National Socialist, (he doesn't openly promote the anarchy of the farther left that I've witnessed), and he has always been known the be a Peronist. Juan Domingo Perón supported the Nazis that fled to Argentina and Chile, as well as their ideology. In certain areas of Argentina, they still celebrate Hitler's birthday. It was the Roman Catholic Church that helped the Nazis escape justice, and placed them throughout Europe as part of Operation Gladio, to fight the Communist influence from Russia. The OSS and the C_A were also behind this, along with Gehlen Org. The ideology behind the New World Order, especially in the EU, is based upon National Socialist ideology (Bush, Dulles brothers, et al too). The EU's roots can be traced back to the Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe) which was a Nazi plan that included the Kalergi plan. This is where they also crawled into bed with the Muslims and Muslim Brotherhood, under the Nazi regime. Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem got on well. Hitler put him on the payroll and gave him a nice flat in Berlin. Before the Russians advanced close enough, they put the Grand Mufti on a plane back to Egypt, where he met up with his cousin, Yasser Arafat. The Soviets recruited Arafat, the KGB trained him, then gave him fake papers, and placed him in Palestine as the head of the PLO. Since the end of WWII, the Germans and Russians have been working together for energy resources in the Middle-East. Also, out of this cabal, was the formation of Gazprom.
    1
  8703. 1
  8704. 1
  8705. 1
  8706. 1
  8707. 1
  8708. 1
  8709. 1
  8710. 1
  8711. 1
  8712. 1
  8713. 1
  8714. 1
  8715. 1
  8716. 1
  8717. 1
  8718. 1
  8719. 1
  8720. 1
  8721. 1
  8722. 1
  8723. 1
  8724. 1
  8725. 1
  8726. 1
  8727. 1
  8728. 1
  8729. 1
  8730. 1
  8731. 1
  8732. 1
  8733. 1
  8734. 1
  8735. 1
  8736. 1
  8737. 1
  8738. 1
  8739. 1
  8740. 1
  8741. 1
  8742. 1
  8743. 1
  8744. 1
  8745. 1
  8746. 1
  8747. 1
  8748. 1
  8749. 1
  8750. 1
  8751. 1
  8752. 1
  8753. 1
  8754. 1
  8755. 1
  8756. 1
  8757. 1
  8758. 1
  8759. 1
  8760. 1
  8761. Red-Pilled Woman: Below is a list of tactics that the book gave for COINTELPRO, once the FBI infiltrated a New Left group. Quote, page 236: Function 1 Create a negative public image 2 Break down internal organization 3 Create dissension between groups [example, Antifa against Alt-Right] 4 Restrict access to group-level resources 5 Restrict ability to protest 6 Hinder the ability of individual targets to participate in group activities 7 Displace conflict 8 Gather information (intelligence) Form A Send anonymous letter B Send fake (signed) letter C Send articles or “public source documents” D Supply information to officials E Plant evidence F Utilize informants G Utilize media source [propaganda] H Disseminate Bureau-generated information about targets I Interview targets J Supply misinformation [propaganda] K Make fake phone call L Actively harass targets M Supply resources to anti–New Left groups P Send ridiculing information My words in [brackets]. He goes on to talk about 9/11, and how we used that to not only bring back COINTELPRO, and legalize it, but we expounded upon it. Of course, he hates it, but the left doesn't play fair, especially the radicals here, the Russians, or their radical Muslims who they fund. There will not be any more Bill Ayers being released over no warrants being issued for wiretaps. I would say that the FBI has allowed the New Left's Antifa and Alt-Right do what they do, so the public can see what they are. I'm looking for a major crackdown starting on Nov. 4th. Antifa and the Alt-Right don't know it, but they've been played.
    1
  8762. 1
  8763. 1
  8764. 1
  8765. 1
  8766. 1
  8767. 1
  8768. 1
  8769. 1
  8770. 1
  8771. 1
  8772. 1
  8773. 1
  8774. 1
  8775. 1
  8776. 1
  8777. 1
  8778. 1
  8779. 1
  8780. 1
  8781. 1
  8782. 1
  8783. 1
  8784. 1
  8785. 1
  8786. 1
  8787. 1
  8788. 1
  8789. 1
  8790. 1
  8791. 1
  8792. 1
  8793. 1
  8794. 1
  8795. 1
  8796. 1
  8797. 1
  8798. 1
  8799. 1
  8800. 1
  8801. 1
  8802. 1
  8803. 1
  8804. 1
  8805. "As OPEC members grew weary of a multi-year supply contest with diminishing returns and shrinking financial reserves, the organization finally attempted its first production cut since 2008. Despite many political obstacles, a September 2016 decision to trim approximately 1 million barrels per day was codified by a new quota agreement at the November 2016 OPEC conference. The agreement (which exempted disruption-ridden members Libya and Nigeria) covered the first half of 2017 – alongside promised reductions from Russia and ten other non-members, offset by expected increases in the US shale sector, Libya, Nigeria, spare capacity, and surging late-2016 OPEC production before the cuts took effect. Indonesia announced another "temporary suspension" of its OPEC membership, rather than accepting the organization's requested 5 percent production cut."__Wikipedia on OPEC, citing Bloomberg. Why did OPEC, and a handful of other nations, decide on a production cut in September 2016, just before the US election? What does a cut gain them, and who does it hurt? Their supposed reason was "diminishing returns and shrinking financial reserves," which means that they wanted the price of crude to go up. However, what about an incoming US President that was intending on investigating things that occurred within these very nations? By the way, the meeting where OPEC made the decision was in Houston. Are any of the old Yukos Oil executives still in Houston or London? There is a reason for Trump announcing that the US would become an exporter not long after the election. Did you know that Russia has controlled the MB since at least 1945?
    1
  8806. 1
  8807. 1
  8808. 1
  8809. 1
  8810. 1
  8811. 1
  8812. 1
  8813. 1
  8814. 1
  8815. 1
  8816. 1
  8817. 1
  8818. 1
  8819. 1
  8820. 1
  8821. 1
  8822. 1
  8823. 1
  8824. 1
  8825. 1
  8826. 1
  8827. 1
  8828. 1
  8829. 1
  8830. 1
  8831. 1
  8832. 1
  8833. 1
  8834. 1
  8835. 1
  8836. 1
  8837. 1
  8838. 1
  8839. 1
  8840. 1
  8841. 1
  8842. 1
  8843. 1
  8844. 1
  8845. 1
  8846. 1
  8847. 1
  8848. 1
  8849. 1
  8850. 1
  8851. 1
  8852. 1
  8853. 1
  8854. 1
  8855. 1
  8856. Ask yourself why there were massive arrests in Saudi Arabia after Trump took office. Who paid for Obama's Harvard tuition? Are you ready for the truth about what Obama and HRC were planning? The New World Order by Ali Maulana Muhammad (1944), published in pre-Pakistan India. Book: https://ia801605.us.archive.org/21/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.233958/2015.233958.The-New.pdf Ask yourself, how did a Muslim know about the NWO in 1944? The UN wasn't officially created until Oct. 1945. The author states the first NWO was the League of Nations, which collapsed, and the second was created during WWII, with their religion at the head. That fits in with Alice Bailey and Blavatsky's eastern theology, which is that of the UN. Think of the socialist rise in the Middle-East, and the socialist Muslim control of the UN and the politicians today. The Red Prince and Al-Waleed? Nazi connections to Pan-Islam, and Pan-Arabism? The Nazi's Neuordnung (New Order)? Operation Paperclip. Unofficially, the lend-lease plan (1941-45) was the UN/NWO, before the UN was founded according to a US military whistleblower, Major Jordan, of that time, during testimony before Congress. (p 2) "cry for a New World Order." (pp 11-15) NWO creation (p 25) World Order (p 26) Islam is the "Order" (p 41) World Order by Islam (p42) "Its eye is closed." Right eye closed; the spiritual eye. See footnotes. (pp 46-47) Islam to cause Europe to fall from within (pp 49-50) Islam is the NWO (p 59) As Muhammad, they will, through revolution, combine the nations into one.
    1
  8857. 1
  8858. 1
  8859. 1
  8860. 1
  8861. 1
  8862. I highly doubt finding a home in Appalachia, with a dirt floor, including those in the heads of hollows, unless it is one preserved by the state. You may find some old clapboard four room homes built similar to the sharecropper's shacks, but yet, they have wood floors. I'd say that the last of the dirt-floored cabins had burned or rotted down by the 1940s-50s. You will find many "company homes" in the hollows, built by the coal companies. What both JFK and LBJ claimed about Appalachia, in the 60s, was a lie. It was a hoax, used to mix whites with blacks, to bring about welfare, etc. The Beverley Hillbillies was filmed as propaganda to promote it, and it gave Appalachia a bad name. By the 1940s, the coal fields, which were the poorest region, were unionized, and people lived pretty well off. When you traveled to the major river valleys, such as along the Ohio River, steel mills employed the people, which were fed by the coal from those mines. At that, it wasn't a lie started by either JFK or LBJ, but Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, where Eleanor had selected West Virginia as her showcase. There, she had an entire village built, with a furniture factory, as her little socialist project, and it failed spectacularly. The houses were prefab homes, not insulated, and the people almost froze to death during their first winter. Some of those homes are still there, which were remodeled, but that factory failed not long after it started. The project was started, to make the claim that those poor whites needed FDR's New Deal socialism. JFK and LBJ expanded upon it, to buy the black vote. You will find, that many of the claims made by the Democratic Party, have no truth to them.
    1
  8863. 1
  8864. 1
  8865. 1
  8866. 1
  8867. 1
  8868. 1
  8869. 1
  8870. 1
  8871. 1
  8872. 1
  8873. 1
  8874. 1
  8875. 1
  8876. 1
  8877. 1
  8878. 1
  8879. 1
  8880. 1
  8881. 1
  8882. 1
  8883. 1
  8884. 1
  8885. 1
  8886. 1
  8887. 1
  8888. 1
  8889. 1
  8890. 1
  8891. 1
  8892. 1
  8893. 1
  8894. 1
  8895. 1
  8896. 1
  8897. Follow the earth's axial tilt. As that changes, the northern hemisphere warms and cools over a 40,000 year span due to where the sun strikes the earth. It's vice versa for the southern. There are orbital variations as well. Orbital Variations : "Changes in orbital eccentricity affect the Earth-sun distance. Currently, a difference of only 3 percent (5 million kilometers) exists between closest approach (perihelion), which occurs on or about January 3, and furthest departure (aphelion), which occurs on or about July 4. This difference in distance amounts to about a 6 percent increase in incoming solar radiation (insolation) from July to January. The shape of the Earth’s orbit changes from being elliptical (high eccentricity) to being nearly circular (low eccentricity) in a cycle that takes between 90,000 and 100,000 years. When the orbit is highly elliptical, the amount of insolation received at perihelion would be on the order of 20 to 30 percent greater than at aphelion, resulting in a substantially different climate from what we experience today." Obliquity (change in axial tilt) : "As the axial tilt increases, the seasonal contrast increases so that winters are colder and summers are warmer in both hemispheres. Today, the Earth's axis is tilted 23.5 degrees from the plane of its orbit around the sun. But this tilt changes. During a cycle that averages about 40,000 years, the tilt of the axis varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. Because this tilt changes, the seasons as we know them can become exaggerated. More tilt means more severe seasons—warmer summers and colder winters; less tilt means less severe seasons—cooler summers and milder winters. It's the cool summers that are thought to allow snow and ice to last from year-to-year in high latitudes, eventually building up into massive ice sheets. There are positive feedbacks in the climate system as well, because an Earth covered with more snow reflects more of the sun's energy into space, causing additional cooling."__NASA What a wicked web some weave for a power and money grab.
    1
  8898. The British still didn't accept defeat in 1812, as they were behind fanning the flames that lead to the Civil War, using the banks and trade to do it. Why send more British when they could agitate the north and south, and have us fight each other? Why? Over national banking. Andrew Jackson refused to renew the charter for the National Bank, which had around a thousand European investors in it. Every war with Britain has been about their loss of the profits to be made by exploiting North America. They'll tell you that the Civil War was about slavery. The British used that issue to stir the cauldron, but that didn't cause it. The British claimed that they had ended slavery, but lied, as they allowed slavery to continue in the East India Company. Next, they'll tell you that the Civil War was about tariffs. No, in reality, it wasn't. The Black Tariff (Tariff of 1842) was severe, but that one was replaced with the Walker Tariff of 1846, which was much lower. Then came the Tariff of 1857, which was a major tax reduction, and one of the lowest in the world. The Morrill Tariff of 1861 didn't occur until after the southern states had already seceded. Bank runs and panics, along with propaganda, led to the Civil War, and the banks, mainly in New York, were behind starting them. They were pushed by their European counterparts. The British and French sent troops into Canada and Mexico, hoping to take the US after we had killed each other. After the Civil War, there was a bank run orchestrated by the banks, less than every ten years, up until the Fed was created. Those bank runs stopped with the creation of the Fed. I wonder why? Look at the British helping to instigate a coup in the US today. British and US financiers have been colluding and controlling things behind the scene since 1902, in the US, pushing for a one world socialist government. Look into who Cecil Rhodes was, what the monopoly companies were, and read the books by Professor Carrol Quigley and Antony Sutton. Read about British Imperialism and their idea of ruling the world. “A financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson.” - Franklin D Roosevelt.
    1
  8899. 1
  8900. 1
  8901. 1
  8902. 1
  8903. 1
  8904. 1
  8905. 1
  8906. 1
  8907. 1
  8908. 1
  8909. 1
  8910. 1
  8911. 1
  8912. 1
  8913. 1
  8914. 1
  8915. 1
  8916. 1
  8917. 1
  8918. 1
  8919. 1
  8920. 1
  8921. 1
  8922. 1
  8923. 1
  8924. 1
  8925. 1
  8926. 1
  8927. 1
  8928. 1
  8929. 1
  8930. From the time of the first use of the word, race, which I think was in the 1500s, and like you say, it meant breed, (human in our case), and just a little after that, they used it to describe a group of people that spoke a common language, it meant something other than today. I always use the words Semite and Semitic to explain, because in either case, it does not describe Jews or Judaism, even though they call people antisemitic. Both words are about an entire group, stretching from Anatolia to Egypt, or the Near East, which describes a group that speaks the Semitic languages, both Arabic and Hebrew. How they equate that to only the Jews I have no idea. . Anyhow, academics kept adding more to the word race, which is their want to do, by dividing the populous, and completely bastardized the word. It was never meant to define ones physical makeup nor skin color. . I listened to an academic discussion about when that changed, and it was said to have changed to skin color in the Caribbean. Neither, though, were sure about this. By the Civil War, here, in the US, we had an academic called Samuel Morton who was collecting the heads of hanged inmates "for science," and he would use the skulls to make distinctions in physical makeup and IQ. He was described as "the father of scientific racism." What I find hilarious about it, is that he was from Philadelphia, north of the Mason Dixon. Philadelphia has long been associated with left-wing politics over the French and German migrants that settled here by the late 1700s. . https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/04/race-genetics-science-africa/ . Now, either we have a very large group of racists teaching today, at the academe, or they are just plain ignorant. If you ask me, I think it's both.
    1
  8931. 1
  8932. 1
  8933. 1
  8934. 1
  8935. 1
  8936. 1
  8937. 1
  8938. 1
  8939. 1
  8940. 1
  8941. 1
  8942. 1
  8943. As Dennis knows, there were several schools of thought within the different ancient Judaic sects, but the one that believed in a life after death, or that our soul (our consciousness), being a part of Gods, returns to God, and would be judged, was the Pharisees. Jesus Christ was also a Pharisee, and he believed the same thing. One Judaic sect even believed, somewhat, in reincarnation. However, being judged after death, goes back to ancient Sumeria, where the liars were shunned in the afterlife. Genesis 6:3: "And the LORD said, "My spirit shall not always strive with [live in] man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.""__KJV My words in brackets. See below for ref. "Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.”"__ESV "And the LORD said: 'My spirit shall not abide in man for ever, for that he also is flesh; therefore shall his days be a hundred and twenty years.'"__JPS Tanakh Strive With, or Abide, means to literally live within. The NIV has this entirely incorrect, along with a few other translations. The JPS Tanakh is the authority on the OT. Also, since the Lord creates both Good and Evil (see Isaiah 45:7), and God's soul is our soul, we can be both good and evil, because we have free will, the same as God. We were made in the Lord's image. Isaiah 45:7: "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."__KJV "I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and create evil; I am the LORD, that doeth all these things."__Tanakh When the soul goes back to God, the creator (the ALL of nature), it will be judged, because God, the creator, knows all. Man is a part of God's intelligence, thus God, the creator, sees and knows all. The soul leaves, and goes back to the whole, or the ALL, at the time of death. To understand this more, read the translated Zohar, especially the chapter on Genesis.
    1
  8944. 1
  8945. 1
  8946. 1
  8947. 1
  8948. 1
  8949. 1
  8950. 1
  8951. 1
  8952. 1
  8953. 1
  8954. 1
  8955. 1
  8956. 1
  8957. 1
  8958. 1
  8959. 1
  8960. 1
  8961. 1
  8962. 1
  8963. 1
  8964. 1
  8965. 1
  8966. 1
  8967. 1
  8968. 1
  8969. 1
  8970. 1
  8971. 1
  8972. 1
  8973. 1
  8974. 1
  8975. 1
  8976. 1
  8977. 1
  8978. 1
  8979. 1
  8980. 1
  8981. 1
  8982. 1
  8983. 1
  8984. 1
  8985. 1
  8986. 1
  8987. 1
  8988. 1
  8989. 1
  8990. 1
  8991. 1
  8992. 1
  8993. 1
  8994. 1
  8995. 1
  8996. 1
  8997. 1
  8998. 1
  8999. 1
  9000. 1
  9001. 1
  9002. 1
  9003. 1
  9004. 1
  9005. 1
  9006. 1
  9007. 1
  9008. 1
  9009. 1
  9010. 1
  9011. I don't know if that can be proven. We're dealing with academics, who've never made beer or wine, and who think that the ergot fungus was accidentally introduced, while others think they knew about it, and added it. Medicine didn't make use of it until the 16th century. "The most prominent member of this group is Claviceps purpurea ("rye ergot fungus"). This fungus grows on rye and related plants, and produces alkaloids that can cause ergotism in humans and other mammals who consume grains contaminated with its fruiting structure (called ergot sclerotium)." Animals, such as cattle, eat the entire plant, and not just the seeds hidden away in their sheaths. It may have been introduced to the seeds by those cultivating it. The fungus grows on the shafts of tall grasses, such as wheat, rye, barley, etc. Whether any can be on the seeds, especially after they're separated from the chaff, is debatable. Next, the seeds are malted, meaning they are wetted, and allowed to sprout, turning the starch to sugar. When the sprouts appear, the seeds are then roasted, stopping the process. What this can do to any lingering ergotamine is unknown. After this, they are milled and added to warm water, where yeast is added, causing it to ferment. It's strained and filtered, leaving beer. As far as wine, I do not believe that ergot fungus grows on grapes. I'm of the belief that the priests or shamans added opium in Eurasia. "Opium has been actively collected since approximately 3400 BC." There may have been other chemicals they added, that are unknown. I believe that this was investigated, when they were studying the Eleusinian Mysteries (Greek rite of passage for young males, where they were raped and sodomized). This rite is actually more ancient than any other, and was found to still be practiced with the Asmat People in Papua, New Guinea.
    1
  9012. 1
  9013. 1
  9014. 1
  9015. 1
  9016. 1
  9017. 1
  9018. 1
  9019. 1
  9020. 1
  9021. 1
  9022. 1
  9023. 1
  9024. 1
  9025. Many people forget China's funding of the Clinton - Gore ticket, and what happened at APEC in Seattle. Of course, they just picked up where GHW Bush left off, as Bush, a globalist neocon, pushed forward what was started under Nixon. All of it, though, starts with Eisenhower and the GOP's neocon policy, which was pro UN, and that policy was kept classified for many years. Ike was asked to run by Dewey, a globalist neocon, and against Taft. Remember, Nixon was Ike's VP. Next, we come to John and Bobby, who first started to fight this corruption, and we remember how that went. Besides Kennedy, it has not mattered who we voted for, as the same policy was pushed, and it grew, until President Trump. Trump is probably the closest president to what Robert A Taft, "Mr. Republican," would have been, if he had won the 1952 election. . "The fight for the Republican nomination was between General Dwight D. Eisenhower, who became the candidate of the party's moderate eastern establishment; Senator Robert A. Taft from Ohio, the longtime leader of the Republican Party's conservative wing; Governor Earl Warren of California, who appealed to Western delegates and independent voters; and former Governor Harold Stassen of Minnesota, who still had a base of support in the Midwest. . "The moderate Eastern Republicans were led by New York Governor Thomas E. Dewey, the party's presidential nominee in 1944 and 1948. The moderates tended to be interventionists, who felt that America needed to fight the Cold War overseas and confront the Soviet Union in Eurasia; they were also willing to accept most aspects of the social welfare state created by the New Deal in the 1930s." . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_United_States_presidential_election
    1
  9026. 1
  9027. One can trace the left's (socialist) ideology back to revolutionary France, with Rousseau. However, another was as important, and that was Claude Henri de Rouvroy, comte de Saint-Simon (1760–1825). His ideology is known as Saint-Simonianism, which was hijacked by the radical socialists and intellectuals. "Saint-Simon stressed the need for recognition of the merit of the individual and the need for hierarchy of merit in society and in the economy, such as society having hierarchical merit-based organizations of managers and scientists to be the decision-makers in government." This school of thought, unfortunately, became warped by later socialists and utopianists, where it became central planning. "Saint Simon's conceptual recognition of broad socio-economic contribution, and his Enlightenment valorization of scientific knowledge, soon inspired and influenced utopian socialism, liberal political theorist John Stuart Mill, anarchism through its founder Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who was inspired by Saint-Simon's thought, and Marxism with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, identifying Saint-Simon as an inspiration to their ideas and classifying him among the utopian socialists. Saint-Simon's views also influenced 20th century sociologist and economist Thorstein Veblen, including Veblen's creation of institutional economics that has included prominent economists as adherents." "Karl Marx identified Saint-Simon as being among whom he called the "utopian socialists", though historian Alan Ryan regards certain followers of Saint-Simon, rather than Saint-Simon himself, as being responsible for the rise of utopian socialism that based itself upon Saint-Simon's ideas. Ryan also distinguishes between Saint-Simon's conceptions and Marxism's, as Saint-Simon did not promote independent working-class organization and leadership as a solution to capitalist societal problems, nor did he adhere to the Marxist definition of the working class as excluded by fundamental private property law from control over the means of production. Unlike Marx, Saint-Simon did not regard class relations, vis the means of production, to be an engine of socio-economic dynamics. Rather the economic issue of concern to Saint-Simon was the form of management. Furthermore, Saint-Simon was not critical of capitalists as exclusive owners, collaborators, controllers, and decision-makers. Rather, he regarded capitalists as an important component of the 'industrial class.' Ryan further suggests that by the 1950s, it was clear that Saint-Simon had presaged the "modern" understanding of industrial society." However, Saint Simon went too far. "In opposition to the feudal and military system—the former aspect of which had been strengthened by the restoration—he advocated a form of technocratic socialism, an arrangement whereby industrial chiefs should control society - similar to Plato's philosopher kings. In place of the medieval church, spiritual direction of society should fall to the men of science. Men who are fitted to organize society for productive labour are entitled to rule it. The conflict between labour and capital emphasized by later socialism is not present in Saint-Simon's work, but it is assumed that the industrial chiefs, to whom the control of production is to fall, shall rule in the interest of society. Later on, the cause of the poor receives greater attention until, in his greatest work, Nouveau Christianisme (The New Christianity), it takes on the form of a religion. This development of his ideas occasioned his final quarrel with Comte." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_de_Saint-Simon During the French Revolution, Babeuf and others were behind the atheist movement, and they started the Cult of Reason. This was replaced by Robespierre's Cult of the Supreme Being, which was dedicated to the worship of the goddess of wisdom. Orthodox religion was restored to normal by Napoleon, but those, like Saint Simon, still adhered to the revolutionary cults, which removed Christian morals from society. We can see the results of technocratic socialism, today, at Silicon Valley, and in education. Is it no wonder that they get on well with the CCP?
    1
  9028. 1
  9029. 1
  9030. 1
  9031. 1
  9032. 1
  9033. 1
  9034. 1
  9035. 1
  9036. 1
  9037. When you figure out that Stalin was the puppet of a handful of rich industrialists and financiers in the west, then you will grasp what really happened. Stalin was working with the same people as were Lenin and Trotsky. Ask yourself, why did they want to move cotton production to Russia? "During Stalin's rule, "Socialism in One Country" became a central tenet of the party's dogma, and Lenin's New Economic Policy was replaced with a centralized command economy. Under the Five-Year Plan system, the country underwent collectivization and rapid industrialization but experienced significant disruptions in food production that contributed to the famine of 1932–33." What was taking place in the west during the early thirties, starting in 1929? The Great Depression? What manufacturers built huge factories in the USSR during that time, and where were they from? Who built the GAZ plant? The manufacturers and financiers were located in the same countries where the people were starving during the Great Depression (US and UK). Who, from the west, came to Russia and helped them write their first five-year plans? The same elite were also building up Nazi Germany and financing the Nazi Party. Quoting Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law's book, "My Exploited Father in Law": “For a long time, I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the Council on Foreign Relations - One World Money group… Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support. The UN is but a long range, international banking apparatus neatly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One World Revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. The depression was caused by "the planned sudden curtailment of call money in Wall Street in the Fall of 1929, described for the uninformed public as "The Panic!"… Obviously, the real objectives of One-World Government leaders and their ever-close bankers, are most devious. They have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the United States of America, via the creation and establishment of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank." End Quote
    1
  9038. 1
  9039. 1
  9040. 1
  9041. 1
  9042. 1
  9043. 1
  9044. 1
  9045. 1
  9046. 1
  9047. 1
  9048. 1
  9049. 1
  9050. 1
  9051. 1
  9052. Let;s try this again. Look over the political platform from 2004 below, and compare it to the Democratic Party's platform. Provide free health care for everyone Expand funding for HIV/AIDS programs Provide reproductive rights and health care for women Fully fund public education from pre-K through college Increase federal spending for job programs for minorities Increase aid and job creation in rural areas Continue price supports and subsidies to family farmers Raise minimum wage to living-wage standard Expand Section 8 and other affordable housing measures Do not privatize Social Security Outlaw racial profiling Abolish the death penalty Institute alternative sentencing for non-violent crimes End discrimination based on sexual orientation Pull the U.S. troops out of Iraq Stop development and testing of nuclear weapons Repeal NAFTA Develop renewable energy alternatives Repeal Healthy Forests and Clear Skies Acts Ratify Kyoto Treaty Increase access education for immigrants Repeal tax cuts for the rich Restore tax rates on the wealthy and corporations to 1970 levels Repeal the Patriot Act Fund enforcement of the Voting Rights Act 2004 Communist Party USA's platform. In 2010, in a report prepared for the Communist Party's 29th National Convention, several members of the Young Communist League USA wrote; "Currently, the conditions rarely if ever allow us to run open Communists for office. When members do run for office, it is within the auspices of the Democratic Party. Otherwise, we find ourselves supporting progressive (and in some instances not-so-progressive) Democratic candidates. Despite how much many of us would love to run comrades for office as Communists, we all agree that this is how we currently have to function in this political climate." http://www.cpusa.org/party_voices/convention-discussion-a-time-to-grow/
    1
  9053. 1
  9054. Nori Chesney: Yes, I think that if Trump can continue, we can keep national sovereignty, which Britain also wants. I believe that Europe has also had enough. The problem will be routing out the bad apples that sold out to China, and remove the China cabal's (China, Russia, Iran, and NK) influence inside the US. That has begun in the US with the China Initiative, and several arrests within the Russian mafia and Iran connected terrorists, as well as an expanded oligarch list. China will either have to play on an equal footing, or be forced out of the WTO. They will also have to be forced to stop influencing the UN, or the UN will have to be left to die. During January 2017, several congressmen proposed a bill that would remove the US from the UN, and the UN from the US. That was stuck in committee. The order will have to be changed, or gotten rid of. They were behind selling out their nations for the globalist scheme. It's totally corrupt. The power elite's (Soros et al) strings will also have to be cut. Luckily, the US still has the most hard and soft power. If the intel agencies can be cleaned out, the US can force the change on the UN and the order by using its allies. Also, Trump stopped the managed decline of US manufacturing, and that will bring back employment and a tax base. It can be done, but it will be a long and hard road. The GOP will have to learn to fight fire with fire, and that the party has changed for good. The clean out of the GOP started happening in 2016, and it's still ongoing.
    1
  9055. 1
  9056. 1
  9057. 1
  9058. 1
  9059. 1
  9060. 1
  9061. 1
  9062. 1
  9063. 1
  9064. 1
  9065. 1
  9066. 1
  9067. 1
  9068. 1
  9069. 1
  9070. 1
  9071. 1
  9072. 1
  9073. 1
  9074. 1
  9075. 1
  9076. kiolasmash550: It really makes no difference about how many shots were fired, except that Oswald was actually involved in it. He also had help, and had orders. The shooting, itself, is a smokescreen used to take the mind off of who was behind it all, or who ordered it. That is where these records tell the tale, which verifies what many have thought, that it was people within the Communist Party USA, the KGB, and Castro/Cuba that was involved in ordering it. It leads to people in the Democratic Party, itself, who was involved with the CPUSA. Oswald, and the Fair Play For Cuba group, leads back to the Southern California District Communist Party at LA, where they called a quick meeting to invent a "temporary party line," and to decide whether to "defend" Oswald, or shout that it was a "frame-up." Gus Hall immediately went into damage control at their NY CPUSA headquarters, along with Anderson, because the Dallas PD had let it leak, that Oswald's orders was written on CPUSA stationary, and this was found in his personal effects. Anderson had also been in contact Oswald three times, that he admitted to. Anderson traveled to a CPUSA meeting, at Wheeling WV, to try to lay blame on a right-wing extremist group in a meeting. Right-wing, meaning the right of the left-wing, which was the Klan, or the American Nazi Party, of the "New Left". Other CPUSA front groups went on the attack, to distance themselves, and deny that Oswald was a member. One even tried to claim it was officer Tippit who did it, along with members of the John Birch Society. It was shown that it was Oswald, who made contact with the KGB, while in Mexico. Oswald was also involved with people working for Cuba. The Dallas PD had started an investigation into the CPUSA, alongside Oswald's investigation. Jack Ruby was involved with the CPUSA, and the Chicago mob, according to informants. The Chicago mob had their hands in the CPUSA, and the motion picture industry in LA, where the SCDCP was located. The same mob had been in Cuba, and worked with the Russians before they left, and set up shop in Vegas. Ruby had also visited Vegas. It was found that Oswald's wife had used the same attorney as did Ruby. Gus Hall was caught, by the FBI, sending a letter to the Kremlin about Lyndon Johnson. The KGB were going to try to lay the blame on Johnson. However, it looks as if the communists or progressives within in the DNC had made his indictment go away, so Johnson became their puppet for legislation, even though he still worked against them with the FBI, using COINTELPRO, and he allowed the Gulf of Tonkin incident to happen, so we could change to a war footing in Vietnam. I guess he had a little saving grace to him. One informant, claimed that Texas politicians were involved in the assassination. The FBI's COINTELPRO came into being in 1956, and JFK made good use of it, along with Operation Mongoose and the CIA. The only CIA plan that JFK didn't accept, was using a false flag idea, of shooting down a plane, to declare war on Cuba. He decided on disrupting the Cuban government, and trying to assassinate Castro and communists in Cuba. That went on until his death, but still continued until the program was exposed by the Church Committee. This is why they had JFK killed, but it didn't stop Johnson or Nixon.
    1
  9077. 1
  9078. 1
  9079. 1
  9080. 1
  9081. 1
  9082. 1
  9083. 1
  9084. 1
  9085. 1
  9086. 1
  9087. 1
  9088. 1
  9089. 1
  9090. 1
  9091. 1
  9092. 1
  9093. 1
  9094. 1
  9095. 1
  9096. 1
  9097. 1
  9098. 1
  9099. 1
  9100. 1
  9101. 1
  9102. 1
  9103. 1
  9104. 1
  9105. 1
  9106. 1
  9107. 1
  9108. 1
  9109. 1
  9110. 1
  9111. 1
  9112. 1
  9113. 1
  9114. 1
  9115. 1
  9116. 1
  9117. 1
  9118. 1
  9119. 1
  9120. 1
  9121. 1
  9122. 1
  9123. 1
  9124. 1
  9125. 1
  9126. 1
  9127. 1
  9128. 1
  9129. 1
  9130. The Federalists have been using political societies and activist movements as excuses to grab more power since Washington was president, and that can be found in Jefferson and Madison's letters to Monroe, as well as what Washington wrote. Example letters about this, from Jefferson, Madison, and Washington, are at the links below. They even intended on using slight of hand to make Washington look to be leading the Federalists, when Washington was an Independent. They claim that the Federalists died out, but they didn't. They hid themselves away, as either Democrats or Republicans, to gain election. . Federalism was always about a huge central government, and a central bank, from the birth of the US Government, and it had ties to Britain. Jefferson founded the Anti-Federalist/Republican Party to fight this very thing. The Democrats, from the Democrat clubs/societies, came in with Madison and Monroe, turning it into the Democratic-Republican Party. The Republicans of Jefferson left the party by 1829, which created the Democratic Party of today. The Republicans came back as the National Republicans, then, the Whigs, and finally, the Republican Party, again, under Lincoln over a thirty year span. . When the nation was founded, they had two extremes in the US, much like today, with the Federalists on one side, and the French radicals and Napoleon on the other. Washington, Jefferson, and Madison saw this, even though they had different political ideologies. They tried to moderate it and be in the center. . Madison to Monroe: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-15-02-0306 Jefferson to Monroe: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-28-02-0275#TSJN-01-28-0275-kw-0001 Washington to McHenry: http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=3&psid=188 Washington about XYZ Affair: https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/democratic-republican-societies/ . Ask yourself why HRC and the Democrats made such a big stink about the play, Hamilton, just after the election. Hamilton is the Democrat's idol.
    1
  9131. 1
  9132. 1
  9133. 1
  9134. 1
  9135. 1
  9136. 1
  9137. 1
  9138. 1
  9139. 1
  9140. 1
  9141. 1
  9142. 1
  9143. 1
  9144. 1
  9145. 1
  9146. 1
  9147. 1
  9148. 1
  9149. 1
  9150. 1
  9151. 1
  9152. 1
  9153. 1
  9154. 1
  9155. 1
  9156. 1
  9157.  @SspaceB  The origin of the word, which is shatan, comes from Persia, specifically Zoroastrian. It's original meaning was that God had two sides, both good and evil, or yin and yang as with the Asiatic belief. When the Persians invaded the Levant, they called the people of the Levant the shatan, or the adversary. Orthodox ####ism is the same, as they do not believe in a separate entity that creates evil. Any orthodox Rabbi will state this. In the NT, Jesus called Peter satan: "Get behind me satan." Being a Rabbi, and using his Hebrew language, Jesus was calling Peter an "adversary," or stumbling block, not some invisible evil being. The word literally means an adversary, or someone that blocks progress. It only became associated with an invisible entity in Job, but it was the angel's job, not its name. Orthodox Hebrews don't believe in this either, and especially what was written in Enoch. Hellenism is the basis for this belief, as there was a Hellenist sect within the Hebrews centered around Antioch, where Paul was from, who believed in some of the Greek's multi-deity beliefs, such as Pluto or Hades, the god of gold and the underworld, which became their Satan. The orthodox Hebrews have never believed this, and still base God upon Isaiah 45:5-7 in the Tanakh : 5) I am the Lord, and there is no other; besides Me there is no God: I will strengthen you although you have not known Me. 6) In order that they know from the shining of the sun and from the west that there is no one besides Me; I am the Lord and there is no other. 7) Who forms light and creates darkness, Who makes peace and creates evil; I am the Lord, Who makes all these. Since man was made in the image of God, man has a dual personality, that of good and evil. There is no "the devil made me do it." Genesis is a rewritten account from ancient Mesopotamia, where they believed in multiple gods and goddesses. However, it is a Hebrew allegorical metaphor that means something else. Any Rabbi will state this, as the serpent in the garden is knowledge; specifically the knowledge of death, which separates man from beast. The Torah is completely written in allegory and metaphor. In the Tanakh, satan is always written as "ha satan," or the adversary. God is even called the satan, when speaking to David about the census. See: The Origin of Satan, by Elaine Pagels PhD, (1995). She is an American historian of religion, and the Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion at Princeton University. She received her PhD at Harvard. Book: "Who is Satan in the New Testament, and what is the evil that he represents? In this groundbreaking book, Elaine Pagels, Princeton's distinguished historian of religion, traces the evolution of Satan from its origins in the Hebrew Bible, where Satan is at first merely obstructive, to the New Testament, where Satan becomes the Prince of Darkness, the bitter enemy of God and man, evil incarnate. In The Origin of Satan, Pagels shows that the four Christian gospels tell two very different stories. The first is the story of Jesus' moral genius: his lessons of love, forgiveness, and redemption. The second tells of the bitter conflict between the followers of Jesus and their fellow ####, a conflict in which the writers of the four gospels condemned as creatures of Satan, those #### who refused to worship Jesus as the Messiah. Writing during and just after the ###### war against Rome, the evangelists invoked Satan to portray their ###### enemies as God's enemies too. As Pagels then shows, the church later turned this satanic indictment against its Roman enemies, declaring that pagans and infidels were also creatures of Satan, and against its own dissenters, calling them heretics and ascribing their heterodox views to satanic influences."
    1
  9158. 1
  9159. 1
  9160. 1
  9161. 1
  9162. 1
  9163. 1
  9164. 1
  9165. 1
  9166. 1
  9167. 1
  9168. 1
  9169. 1
  9170. 1
  9171. 1
  9172. 1
  9173. 1
  9174. 1
  9175. 1
  9176. 1
  9177. 1
  9178. 1
  9179. 1
  9180. 1
  9181. 1
  9182. 1
  9183. 1
  9184. 1
  9185. 1
  9186. 1
  9187. 1
  9188. 1
  9189. Moonlit Monkey: The problem with the Democratic Party, starting in the early part of the 20th century, was due to what our government called the Bolshevik influence, which they had started to investigate under several congressional committees. It was Marx's socialism/communism, which led to some of FDR's New Deal, where we first opened the door to leaving the personal merit and responsibility of the individual. The big change was Social Security, which I can see as a good thing, as that forced people to pay into a retirement savings account. It wasn't an entitlement per se; something free, or making others pay for us, but it was a socialist idea. Before that, a family generally had to take in their parents, when they were too old to work, creating a hardship on the young family, because people failed to save. FDR was also in bed with the unions, of which many were being controlled by the Communist Party USA, and this spiked inflation, plus devalued the dollar, over their continuing demands for pay raises. Maybe, if it had stayed at this level, we might have been all right, but it didn't. As the far-left gained more control of the Democrats, they started demanding entitlements or welfare, and that is where we left a sustainable conservative capitalist society for a socialist one, and created a mass of people who take advantage of the system. We reached that with Lyndon Johnson, and this ideology came from the progressive's (communist) influence, who had been absorbed by the Democrats around 1951-52. We switched to socialism in 1964, with Johnson's "Great Society," and it has been a downhill slide of mounting debt, higher taxes, entitlement, lack of work ethic, and a hatred of merit and personal responsibility ever since, with an increasingly entitlement natured population. People had warned Karl Marx of this, and of course he scoffed at it, in his Communist Manifesto, claiming it wouldn't happen. It has happened in every nation that socialism has been tried in. Here, is where we leave individual responsibility, or the thought that others ought to be responsible for us, and that others ought to be forced, by taxation, to pay into a welfare program to keep another person of no relation up. That is the Robin Hood Effect. Starting with Johnson, each Democratic president has added another part of the socialist plan.
    1
  9190. 1
  9191. 1
  9192. 1
  9193. 1
  9194. 1
  9195. 1
  9196. 1
  9197. 1
  9198. 1
  9199. 1
  9200. 1
  9201. 1
  9202. 1
  9203. 1
  9204. 1
  9205. 1
  9206. 1
  9207. 1
  9208. 1
  9209. 1
  9210. 1
  9211. Oh no, the blasphemy! The left will die of the vapors over this video! You're talking about MERIT based pay, which Karl Marx, the quintessential leftist, despised with every fiber of his being, to the point of lying about it being the Jews and Christians fault, and calling them snakes. Yes, to the left, merit means inequality, as to them, that is not all inclusive, and it isn't equity. You see, the left thinks that everyone should receive the same pay, irregardless if they're as dumb as a rock, have no skill, or that they're just too lazy to reach down and scratch their own toes. Marx thought that merit was the scourge of religion, and he stated that in order for the Jews and Christians to succeed, then they must become atheists, and act just like him. You see, his father, an attorney, pretty much disowned him, he was lazy, a drunk, an irreligious libertine, on the run a lot, lived in squalor, and had way more children than he could afford. He wanted us to become like him! Oh, the horror of merit (not)! The left does not understand, that when the minimum wage is raised, it increases inflation, just as sure as putting more money into the system does, by the Fed, and the Fed has to put more money in, over the raise. It takes about a year, after a minimum wage raise, but the price of everything, especially the essentials, go up. Food, rent, house and automobile payments, interest, gasoline, utilities, they all start creeping up, within the first year, and after a few years, that raise is no longer there, and you're right back to where you started, but now, everything is inflated, and the dollar is now worth much less. They also don't understand, especially the service industry, that they'll shutter the businesses that employ them, or many will lose their jobs, because the business can't afford to pay them, and keep their doors open. It's either that, or you start selling $15.00 hamburgers, which nobody will buy. Now, if they ever bring in true socialism/communism, they'll receive only a pittance, have no capital, be barely able to feed themselves, live in the squalor where the government puts them, and the government will control all the jobs. They'll lose private ownership of land. The only ones who have any money, will be those employed by the government, especially those in the clique of the one running the country, while the proletariat starves. It happens every time. That's what the left fails to tell everyone about their socialistic system.
    1
  9212. 1
  9213. 1
  9214. 1
  9215. 1
  9216. 1
  9217. 1
  9218. 1
  9219. 1
  9220. 1
  9221. 1
  9222. 1
  9223. 1
  9224. 1
  9225. 1
  9226. 1
  9227. 1
  9228. 1
  9229. 1
  9230. 1
  9231. 1
  9232. 1
  9233. 1
  9234. 1
  9235. 1
  9236. 1
  9237. 1
  9238. 1
  9239. 1
  9240. 1
  9241. 1
  9242. 1
  9243. 1
  9244. I think it was Bannon, who was ready to go, and they planned it. What Bannon spoke about, that I've heard, was the truth, about an economic war with China. That was discussed early on, at several places, just after the election. It was discussed that it was the real reason for our Navy being there, and that we are keeping an eye on those artificial islands in the South China Sea. It has been discussed, that China had their eyes on the Indochina countries in the south, looking to do an expansion and takeover. It has to do about them using other currency but the dollar for oil, and the manipulation of the Yuan. China was in cahoots with Russia on dropping the dollar to pay for oil. China was also making a run on precious metals, and started selling fake bullion. China is one of the largest counterfeiters in US currency. People are not aware of this, but if you know where to go for news, you hear about it all. Bannon was correct, about a war with North Korea, and what would happen to Seoul, if it happened. There would be no saving them, as they are too close to the border. We used them to place our military in the area. What surprised me, was Bannon admitting to this, when I thought that they would keep this quite for much longer. This is still about communist country expansion, and their threatening the US economy. It is what the Korean, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Iraq wars were about, and it is why we're in Syria now, and fighting with Yemen. It is the same policy laid out by Eisenhower, which the new left (communist left) have been fighting against. Does anyone remember how Jerry Brown got awfully cozy to China, when they spoke about seceding? What about the Clinton Democrats crawling into bed with China? China's economy, right now, is a bubble waiting to be popped.
    1
  9245. 1
  9246. 1
  9247. 1
  9248. 1
  9249. 1
  9250. 1
  9251. 1
  9252. 1
  9253. 1
  9254. 1
  9255. 1
  9256. 1
  9257. 1
  9258. 1
  9259. 1
  9260. 1
  9261. 1
  9262. 1
  9263. 1
  9264. 1
  9265. 1
  9266. 1
  9267. 1
  9268. 1
  9269. 1
  9270. 1
  9271. 1
  9272. 1
  9273. 1
  9274. 1
  9275. 1
  9276. 1
  9277. 1
  9278. 1
  9279. 1
  9280. 1
  9281. 1
  9282. 1
  9283. 1
  9284. 1
  9285. 1
  9286. 1
  9287. 1
  9288. 1
  9289. 1
  9290. When in 2012-13 they gutted the Smith-Mundt Act with H.R.5736 - Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, this is the result. Read carefully: Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 - Amends the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 to authorize the Secretary of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to provide for the preparation and dissemination of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States, including about its people, its history, and the federal government's policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors. (Under current law such authority is restricted to information disseminated abroad, with a limited domestic exception.) Authorizes the Secretary and the Board to make available in the United States motion pictures, films, video, audio, and other materials prepared for dissemination abroad or disseminated abroad pursuant to such Act, the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994, the Radio Broadcasting to Cuba Act, or the Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act. Amends the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 to prohibit funds for the Department of State or the Board from being used to influence public opinion or propagandizing in the United States. (Under current law such provision applies to the United States Information Agency [USIA].) Applies such prohibition only to programs carried out pursuant to the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994, the Radio Broadcasting to Cuba Act, and the Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act. States that such provision shall: (1) not prohibit the Department or the Board from providing information about its operations, policies, programs, or program material, or making such information available to members of the media, public, or Congress; (2) not be construed to prohibit the Department from engaging in any medium of information on a presumption that a U.S. domestic audience may be exposed to program material; and (3) apply only to the Department and the Board and to no other federal department or agency.
    1
  9291. 1
  9292. 1
  9293. 1
  9294. 1
  9295. 1
  9296. 1
  9297. 1
  9298. 1
  9299. 1
  9300. 1
  9301. 1
  9302. 1
  9303. 1
  9304. 1
  9305. 1
  9306. 1
  9307. 1
  9308. 1
  9309. 1
  9310. 1
  9311. 1
  9312. 1
  9313. 1
  9314. 1
  9315. 1
  9316. 1
  9317. 1
  9318. 1
  9319. 1
  9320. 1
  9321. 1
  9322. 1
  9323. 1
  9324. 1
  9325. 1
  9326. 1
  9327. 1
  9328. 1
  9329. 1
  9330. 1
  9331. 1
  9332. 1
  9333. 1
  9334. 1
  9335. 1
  9336. 1
  9337. 1
  9338. 1
  9339. 1
  9340. 1
  9341. 1
  9342. 1
  9343. 1
  9344. 1
  9345. 1
  9346. 1
  9347. 1
  9348. 1
  9349. 1
  9350. 1
  9351. 1
  9352. 1
  9353. 1
  9354. 1
  9355. 1
  9356. 1
  9357. 1
  9358. 1
  9359. 1
  9360. 1
  9361. 1
  9362. 1
  9363. 1
  9364. 1
  9365. 1
  9366. 1
  9367. 1
  9368. 1
  9369. 1
  9370. 1
  9371. 1
  9372. The problem with the general public, is that they do not seem to understand just how corrupt DC is, or how to see beneath the lies that are spoon fed to them by the media. I listened to one of our Generals, not long back, state how our military was there to serve the "public interest" around the world. What is that public interest? Money, and the economy. Bill Clinton stated it best, years back, when he said "It's the economy, stupid"! The US economies collapse can be traced back to Lyndon Johnson, who's Great Society and Vietnam was responsible for the collapse of the 1944 Bretton-Woods Agreement, which threw the US into a trade imbalance with Asia. We had also become involved in deposing the rulers of the new Middle-Eastern states, via the CIA, starting with Iran, because they nationalized what is now BP Oil. Ike cut a deal with Britain, in that if we would help start a coup to overthrow Mosaddegh, then US oil companies could join BP in Iran. We've been in the Middle-East ever since, fighting proxy wars against the Russian controlled socialist states. It is the US and its allies, against Russia and its allies. Bretton-Woods had the dollar pegged to gold. When that collapsed, Nixon was stuck with the mess, and that is when he made the dollar a floating currency, and began to tie the dollar to oil through OPEC. Nixon also went after the Great Society programs, and we see what the left did to him. Today, look at Syria. Obama, Kerry, and Hillary lied through their teeth, about it being about human rights. It was about an oil and gas pipeline to feed Europe. The pipeline we wanted, would start in Qatar, run through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Syria, then end in Turkey to supply Europe. Assad said no to this, because he and Russia wanted a pipeline to run from Iran to Turkey. The US military is setting on the very land that a pipeline would cross, right now, in Syria. RFK Jr. exposed this back in 2016. Is it in the public interest? Yes, it is. Would we rather have Russia controlling the energy resources, or the US, which our dollar is tied to? This is why Russia and China made an agreement to use the Chinese yuan for oil, which they will convert to gold. It would destroy the petro-dollar, and collapse the US economy.
    1
  9373. 1
  9374. 1
  9375. 1
  9376. 1
  9377. 1
  9378. 1
  9379. 1
  9380. 1
  9381. 1
  9382. 1
  9383. 1
  9384. 1
  9385. 1
  9386. 1
  9387. 1
  9388. 1
  9389. 1
  9390. 1
  9391. 1
  9392. 1
  9393. 1
  9394. 1
  9395. Tik, I'll explain Freemasonry below, since I am one. Freemasonry, in 1717, switched from being a labor union and college/guild to a fraternity set up to fund a pension for the Masons that lost work, in London, after the rebuilding from the fire in 1666 wound down. They allowed people to join from the Royal Society, who were early academics, and from there, they began studying the world's religions (comparative religion). They looked at Hermeticism, because of alchemy, especially the early chemists, to see if the great panacea could actually be made, and to see if gold could be made from lead, etc. What they found hidden was where the alchemists looked at procreation, and based early chemistry on that (the mixing of two things to make one). Early physicians from the RS, who were members, were also involved. Freemasonry, as a guild and college, was started in Rome by Constantine, and they built the castles, etc., in Britain, starting in the ninth century. It was one of several guilds. The fraternity is not religious, even though it was tied to Christianity as a guild, and what it does is lead its members, if they wish, on the Pilgrim's Path to enlightenment, which is following the history of religion and the occult back to its beginnings as you described. In reality, you learn that all religion is invented by man, and it's based upon creation and procreation (sex, birth, and marriage). Most who travel the complete path become agnostic, and some, atheistic, just as academics do in university. There are a few that do not make it to the end of the path, much like Kant, and believe in the occult, thus, the offshoots, which led to believing in things such as the NSDAP did.
    1
  9396. 1
  9397. 1
  9398. 1
  9399. 1
  9400. 1
  9401. 1
  9402. 1
  9403. 1
  9404. 1
  9405. 1
  9406. 1
  9407. 1
  9408. 1
  9409. 1
  9410. 1
  9411. 1
  9412. 1
  9413. 1
  9414. 1
  9415. 1
  9416. 1
  9417. 1
  9418. 1
  9419. 1
  9420. 1
  9421. 1
  9422. 1
  9423. 1
  9424. 1
  9425. 1
  9426. 1
  9427. 1
  9428. 1
  9429. 1
  9430. 1
  9431. 1
  9432. 1
  9433. 1
  9434. 1
  9435. One notices the union involvement in the entire thing, from the start. 20th century unions were violent anarchist groups. The neo-progressives were behind them, even starting a few of the unions. These are not the progressives of FDR's fifth cousin, Theodore. There's some interesting history behind the Progressive Party of 1948, especially about who those progressives were. Take a look at the history of Henry Wallace, who was the VP under FDR. There was a reason that they removed Wallace from the 1944 ticket, during their convention, replacing him with Truman, and there is a reason why Wallace ran as a progressive in 1948. Drastically raising wages, ignoring inflation, a welfare state, and union violence, can be traced back to the people within the 1940s Progressive Party, and socialism, which was relatively new in the US at that time. This new Progressive Party, (neo-progressives), was not the same political party as that of Teddy Roosevelt (R). The group behind it, hijacked the name, and a description of this lot is below. "The Progressive Party of Henry Wallace was, and remains, controversial due to the issue of communist influence. The party served as a safe haven for communists, fellow travelers, and anti-war liberals during the Second Red Scare. Prominent Progressive Party supporters included U.S. Representative Vito Marcantonio and writer Norman Mailer." [sic] __Wikipedia. This same lot are behind today's progressives, except now, they're openly admitting to being communists and neo-Marxists.
    1
  9436. 1
  9437. 1
  9438. 1
  9439. 1
  9440. 1
  9441. 1
  9442. 1
  9443. 1
  9444. 1
  9445. 1
  9446. 1
  9447. 1
  9448. 1
  9449. 1
  9450. 1
  9451. 1
  9452. 1
  9453. 1
  9454. 1
  9455. 1
  9456. 1
  9457. 1
  9458. 1
  9459. 1
  9460. 1
  9461. 1
  9462. 1
  9463. 1
  9464. 1
  9465. 1
  9466. 1
  9467. 1
  9468. 1
  9469. 1
  9470. 1
  9471. 1
  9472. 1
  9473. 1
  9474. 1
  9475. 1
  9476. 1
  9477. 1
  9478. 1
  9479. 1
  9480. 1
  9481. 1
  9482. 1
  9483. 1
  9484. 1
  9485. 1
  9486. 1
  9487. 1
  9488. 1
  9489. 1
  9490. 1
  9491. 1
  9492. 1
  9493. 1
  9494.  @dmichael1172  Slaveholders were in the north as well, but the northern apologists don't like speaking about that. On top of that, not everybody was a slaveholder on either side, only a percentage was, and by the time of the war, several had already begun freeing their slaves. All would have released them if the government would have compensated them for their monetary loss, as they had borrowed big money from the north to buy them when it was legal. After the war, most went bankrupt and lost everything. Slavery was wrong, but that was what occurred. The history is more complicated than what many know, as it's more about politics and law, where the tale of what led to the Civil War that's told today is packed full of fabrications, such as Lincoln being a great man, when he was just as racist as anyone else. He was for the Corwin Amendment, which would have permanently legalized slavery. That constitutional amendment was offered to the south, yet they left anyhow. Why? State's rights, northern corruption, high tariffs, national banking, a standing army, warmongering, and not strictly reading or following constitutional law. Slavery was only a portion of it, but it was the card they pulled to cover up the rest. The party that became the GOP was not the Old Republicans of Jefferson. They were the old Federalists, who had lost their party, and were mixed in with a few other smaller factions that became the Whig Party. They've tried to rewrite the history of Hamilton's big brother government Federalists, who were in bed with Britain, and hide what party they later became since the war. That was then forced upon everyone with and after reconstruction, and it was they that had also crawled into bed with socialism by the late 1800s, which came into education with Christian Socialism in Massachusetts and New York. By 1901, it had infected both parties, mainly in the north, under the guise of progressivism with Roosevelt and Wilson.
    1
  9495. 1
  9496. 1
  9497. 1
  9498. 1
  9499. 1
  9500. 1
  9501. 1
  9502. 1
  9503. 1
  9504. 1
  9505. 1
  9506. 1
  9507. 1
  9508. 1
  9509. 1
  9510. 1
  9511. 1
  9512. It occurred in several western nations starting in the thirties, where the supposed anti-Stalinist Trotskyites, who claimed they didn't believe in "Soviet socialism," left the left wing and joined the right. What they believed in was Trotskyism (international socialism). Needless to say, some even joined in the fascist movement, because that was anti-Stalinist and anti-Soviet. In the US, they took up a new name, Neoconservatism and the New Right, and they overtook the old (real) conservative coalition to control the R Party in 1952. The first of them were taught by the Frankfurt School professors that had fled to the US, and were now in a handful of colleges and universities. One college in particular, the City College of New York, became known as the "Harvard of the Proletariat." The grads became known as the "New York Intellectuals," who then founded "new conservatism," which was internationalist socialism. Nixon became one, and the Bush family were his underlings. The New York Intellectuals were seen as a twin to the Bloomsbury Group in the UK, with an affiliation to the Fabian Society. This left the US voter with a choice, the D Party, which had supported Stalin, and was infested with hard line communists, or the R Party that now believed in Trotsky's international socialism. One was as bad as the other, were in cahoots, and it led the US into all its wars after WWII, as these Trotskyites were the war hawks as well. Wolfowitz is an example. It was spreading Trotskyism, hidden as "liberal democracy," in a nation building scheme via the barrel of a gun, and it caused the world to hate the US over its interference. I can back the US' actions in the Caribbean and the Americas to remove Soviet and Chinese influence (in our own backyard), but not in Eurasia nor Africa, and I sure do not back nation building. I don't back Trotskyism either, as I'm one of the few true old conservatives left.
    1
  9513. 1
  9514. 1
  9515. 1
  9516. 1
  9517. 1
  9518. 1
  9519. 1
  9520. 1
  9521. 1
  9522. 1
  9523. There has been a concerted effort to destroy religion in the west for many years. Again, those in think-tanks and politics think that it will stop all wars. Below, I quote George Brock Chisholm M.D., who was a Canadian psychiatrist, medical practitioner, World War I veteran, and the first director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO). About Chisholm: "Chisholm was a controversial public speaker who nevertheless spoke with great conviction, and drew much criticism from the Canadian public for comments in the mid-1940s that children should not be encouraged to believe in Santa Claus, the Bible or anything he regarded as supernaturalism. Calls for his resignation as Deputy Minister of Health were quelled by his appointment as Executive Secretary of the WHO."__Wikipedia Quote: "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas. "For many generations we have bowed our necks to the yoke of the conviction of sin. We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents.... "There is something to be said... for gently putting aside the mistaken old ways of our elders if that is possible. If it cannot be done gently, it may have to be done roughly or even violently." End Quote. Ref: George Brock Chisholm, Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM), Famous Quotes About Rights and Liberty, Form #08.001 (2014). G. Brock Chisholm, "The Re-Establishment of Peacetime Society," Psychiatry, February 1946, which was later published by Alger Hiss.
    1
  9524. 1
  9525. 1
  9526. 1
  9527. 1
  9528. 1
  9529. 1
  9530. 1
  9531. 1
  9532. The truth about why the US military is all over the world can be traced back to the Atlantic Charter and the creation of the UN under the guise of Lend-Lease. "cash-and-carry" / Neutrality Act of 1939: In September of 1939, Roosevelt persuaded Congress to pass a "cash-and-carry" provision that allowed warring nations to buy U.S. arms as long as they paid cash and transported them in their own ships. This was done in spite of many in the US not wanting these sales to happen. Lend-Lease Act: By late 1940, however, Britain had no more cash to spend in the arsenal of "democracy." Roosevelt tried to help by suggesting a new plan that he called a lend-lease policy. Under this plan, the president would lend or lease arms and other supplies to "any country whose defense was vital to the United States. The act was passed in 1941. Atlantic Charter / "A Declaration of the United Nations": The Atlantic Charter was a joint declaration released by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on August 14, 1941 following a meeting of the two heads of state in Newfoundland. Although Churchill hoped for a military commitment, he settled for a joint declaration of war aims, called the Atlantic Charter. Both countries pledged the following: collective security, disarmament, self-determination, economic cooperation, and freedom of the seas. The Atlantic Charter became the basis of a new document called "A Declaration of the United Nations." The term United Nations was suggested by Roosevelt to express the common purpose of the Allies, those nations that had fought the Axis powers. The declaration was signed by 26 nations, "four-fifths of the human race" observed Churchill. Essentially, the US became the world police through the UN. GHW Bush stated that he would revitalize the US role as the world police for the New World Order (UN). The UN was the NWO 2, as the failed League of Nations was the first. It was all pre-planned, and the idea of a NWO dates back to the 1800s, before Cecil Rhodes, though Rhodes and Milner brought it into life.
    1
  9533. 1
  9534. 1
  9535. 1
  9536. 1
  9537. 1
  9538. 1
  9539. 1
  9540. 1
  9541. 1
  9542. 1
  9543. 1
  9544. 1
  9545. 1
  9546. 1
  9547. 1
  9548. 1
  9549. 1
  9550. 1
  9551. 1
  9552. 1
  9553. 1
  9554. 1
  9555. 1
  9556. 1
  9557. 1
  9558. 1
  9559. 1
  9560. 1
  9561. 1
  9562. 1
  9563. 1
  9564. 1
  9565. 1
  9566. 1
  9567. 1
  9568. 1
  9569. 1
  9570. 1
  9571. 1
  9572. 1
  9573. 1
  9574. 1
  9575. 1
  9576. 1
  9577. 1
  9578. 1
  9579. 1
  9580. 1
  9581. 1
  9582. 1
  9583. 1
  9584. 1
  9585. 1
  9586. 1
  9587. 1
  9588. 1
  9589. 1
  9590. 1
  9591. If you listen to Pelosi's platform, you will notice that it almost matched the 2004 platform of the Communist Party USA. See Below. Provide free health care for everyone Expand funding for HIV/AIDS programs Provide reproductive rights and health care for women Fully fund public education from pre-K through college Increase federal spending for job programs for minorities Increase aid and job creation in rural areas Continue price supports and subsidies to family farmers Raise minimum wage to living-wage standard Expand Section 8 and other affordable housing measures Do not privatize Social Security Outlaw racial profiling Abolish the death penalty Institute alternative sentencing for non-violent crimes End discrimination based on sexual orientation Pull the U.S. troops out of Iraq Stop development and testing of nuclear weapons Repeal NAFTA Develop renewable energy alternatives Repeal Healthy Forests and Clear Skies Acts Ratify Kyoto Treaty (pro-global warming) Increase access education for immigrants Repeal tax cuts for the rich Restore tax rates on the wealthy and corporations to 1970 levels Repeal the Patriot Act Fund enforcement of the Voting Rights Act 2004 CPUSA platform. In 2010, in a report prepared for the Communist Party's 29th National Convention, several members of the Young Communist League USA wrote: "Currently, the conditions rarely if ever allow us to run open Communists for office. When members do run for office, it is within the auspices of the Democratic Party. Otherwise, we find ourselves supporting progressive (and in some instances not-so-progressive) Democratic candidates. Despite how much many of us would love to run comrades for office as Communists, we all agree that this is how we currently have to function in this political climate." http://www.cpusa.org/party_voices/convention-discussion-a-time-to-grow/ For more on the CPUSA, go here: http://www.keywiki.org/Communist_Party_USA See the sections: Running as Democrats [Communist] Party USA Discusses Obama and Democrats, at Int'l Communist Meet Communist Party “utilizes” the Democrats Possibilities under Obama.
    1
  9592. 1
  9593. 1
  9594. 1
  9595. 1
  9596. 1
  9597. 1
  9598. 1
  9599. 1
  9600. 1
  9601. 1
  9602. 1
  9603. 1
  9604. 1
  9605. 1
  9606. 1
  9607. 1
  9608. 1
  9609. 1
  9610. 1
  9611. 1
  9612. 1
  9613. 1
  9614. 1
  9615. 1
  9616. 1
  9617. 1
  9618. 1
  9619. 1
  9620. 1
  9621. 1
  9622. 1
  9623. 1
  9624. 1
  9625. 1
  9626. 1
  9627. 1
  9628. 1
  9629. 1
  9630. 1
  9631. 1
  9632. 1
  9633. 1
  9634. 1
  9635. 1
  9636. 1
  9637. 1
  9638. 1
  9639. 1
  9640. 1
  9641. What one needs to understand about the Islamic Middle-East is that there are two religious factions, the mystics and the orthodox. The mystics (Sufi/Sunni) generally always side with the socialists. Then, there are two political factions in all Muslim countries, where there is a socialist-left such as that of the old Baath Party in Iraq under Saddam, the Red Prince and Al-Waleed in Saudi Arabia, Assad in Syria (Baath Party), and the politics of Iran under the Mullahs. The leftwing is behind what we see today, and this is why they ally themselves with Russia and China. Ask yourself which ex-President of the US put Saddam Hussein in power (1979) before he became president? Saddam officially ruled over Iraq several years before 1979, starting in 1976. Then, ask yourself, who put the Assad family in power (1971) via a coup? Where were Bush and Cheney during those years? "Saddam formally rose to power in 1979, although he had already been the de facto head of Iraq for several years. " "In 1976, Saddam rose to the position of general in the Iraqi armed forces and rapidly became the strongman of the government. As the ailing, elderly al-Bakr became unable to execute his duties, Saddam took on an increasingly prominent role as the face of the government both internally and externally. He soon became the architect of Iraq's foreign policy and represented the nation in all diplomatic situations. He was the de facto leader of Iraq some years before he formally came to power in 1979." "In 1971, President Richard Nixon appointed [George H W] Bush as Ambassador to the United Nations, and he became Chairman of the Republican National Committee in 1973. The following year, President Gerald Ford appointed him Chief of the Liaison Office in China and later made him the director of Central Intelligence [1976-77]." Cheney "began his political career as an intern for Congressman William A. Steiger, eventually working his way into the White House during the Nixon and Ford administrations, where he later served as the White House chief of staff, from 1975 to 1977. In 1978, Cheney was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives representing Wyoming's at-large congressional district from 1979 to 1989; he was reelected five times, briefly serving as House minority whip in 1989. Cheney was selected to be the secretary of defense during the presidency of George H. W. Bush, holding the position for the majority of Bush's term from 1989 to 1993.[6] During his time in the Department of Defense, Cheney oversaw the 1991 Operation Desert Storm, among other actions. Out of office during the Clinton administration, Cheney was the Chairman and CEO of Halliburton Company from 1995 to 2000." "I was blind but now I see." Wake up, folks!
    1
  9642. 1
  9643. 1
  9644. 1
  9645. 1
  9646. 1
  9647. 1
  9648. 1
  9649. 1
  9650. 1
  9651. 1
  9652. 1
  9653. 1
  9654. 1
  9655. 1
  9656. 1
  9657. 1
  9658. 1
  9659. 1
  9660. 1
  9661. 1
  9662. 1
  9663. 1
  9664. 1
  9665. 1
  9666. 1
  9667. The truth, is that the religious Jewish community, in Palestine, has been attacked by Arabs, since not long after the Faisal–Weizmann Agreement was signed (before WWII). The Faisal–Weizmann Agreement was about allowing the Jews to return to Palestine, and live in peace with the Arabs. The "jihadist" attacks were started by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, who eventually ran, and crawled into bed with Hitler, living in Berlin. He was also responsible for modern-day Jihad (suicide in the name of Allah). These attacks haven't stopped. Britain and France are also guilty of cutting a deal, in secret, (Sykes–Picot Agreement), behind the Jews backs, during the same time of the Faisal–Weizmann Agreement. Worse, the Sykes-Picot Agreement had been made public by the Bolsheviks. The Declaration to the Seven, and the Anglo-French Declaration had also became public record. Plus, Emir Faisal tried to back out of the deal that he made with the Jews, shortly after he learned of the British and French agreement. Faisal was later made the king of the new Iraq. "The Sykes–Picot Agreement had called for an "Arab State or a Confederation of Arab States ... under the suzerainty of an Arab chief." The French and British also proposed an international administration in the "brown area" (an area including Jerusalem, similar to and smaller than Mandate Palestine), the form of which was to be decided upon after consultation with Russia, and subsequently in consultation with the other Allies, "and the representatives of the Shereef of Mecca."" Who got the shitty end of the stick? The Arabs have never been guiltless in this; read their history.
    1
  9668. 1
  9669. 1
  9670. 1
  9671. 1
  9672. 1
  9673. 1
  9674. 1
  9675. 1
  9676. 1
  9677. 1
  9678. 1
  9679. 1
  9680. 1
  9681. 1
  9682. 1
  9683. 1
  9684. 1
  9685. 1
  9686. 1
  9687. 1
  9688. 1
  9689. 1
  9690. 1
  9691. 1
  9692. 1
  9693. 1
  9694. 1
  9695. 1
  9696. 1
  9697. 1
  9698. 1
  9699. 1
  9700. 1
  9701. 1
  9702. 1
  9703. 1
  9704. 1
  9705. 1
  9706. 1
  9707. 1
  9708. 1
  9709. 1
  9710. 1
  9711. 1
  9712. 1
  9713. 1
  9714. 1
  9715. 1
  9716. 1
  9717. 1
  9718. 1
  9719. 1
  9720. 1
  9721. 1
  9722. 1
  9723. 1
  9724. 1
  9725. 1
  9726. 1
  9727. 1
  9728. 1
  9729. 1
  9730. 1
  9731. 1
  9732. 1
  9733. 1
  9734. 1
  9735. 1
  9736. 1
  9737. 1
  9738. 1
  9739. 1
  9740. 1
  9741. 1
  9742. 1
  9743. 1
  9744. 1
  9745. 1
  9746. 1
  9747. 1
  9748. 1
  9749. 1
  9750. 1
  9751. 1
  9752. 1
  9753. 1
  9754. 1
  9755. 1
  9756. 1
  9757. 1
  9758. 1
  9759. 1
  9760. 1
  9761. 1
  9762. 1
  9763. 1
  9764. 1
  9765. 1
  9766. 1
  9767. 1
  9768. 1
  9769. 1
  9770. 1
  9771. 1
  9772. 1
  9773. 1
  9774. 1
  9775.  @danmoritz3319  You still don't get it, do you? The Whigs were courting socialism when it started. Horace Greely, a Whig close to Clay, happily published Marx's screeds in his New York newspaper, and Lincoln became a pen pal of Marx. The Roosevelt family in New York were big followers of Marx as well. It was within the Protestant denominations by the late 1800s, though it came in with the Anabaptists, and it had infected the Episcopalians in Boston, (Church of the Carpenter and a few others), and then came to New York. That's why it was within Columbia U by 1900. They were called "Christian Socialists." That is the same university, along with two other New York colleges, which brought the Frankfurt School professors in under Dewey. Before that, they were involved in forming the Rand School of Social Science, where Trotsky was lecturing before he left to meet up with Lenin at Saint Petersburg. After Trotsky fled to Mexico, Dewey made a trip down there to "prove Trotsky's innocence." The grads from Columbia U became the New York Intellectuals, who infected both parties that were already infected by Roosevelt's big government and socialist progressivism. The grads infiltrated the GOP by the early fifties and created the Neoconservatives. Roosevelt's progressivism was Federalist Socialism, and Wilson was a proud follower as well. Old Jeffersonian Republican belief, which is what 45 wanted to bring back, and why he favored Jackson, was almost stomped out after the Civil War, courtesy of the new GOP.
    1
  9776. 1
  9777. 1
  9778. 1
  9779. 1
  9780. 1
  9781. 1
  9782. 1
  9783. 1
  9784. 1
  9785. 1
  9786. 1
  9787. 1
  9788. 1
  9789. 1
  9790. 1
  9791. 1
  9792. 1
  9793. 1
  9794. 1
  9795. 1
  9796. 1
  9797. 1
  9798. 1
  9799. 1
  9800. 1
  9801. 1
  9802. 1
  9803. 1
  9804. 1
  9805. 1
  9806. What the Democrats essentially did, was a reverse of what Nixon did. Nixon was looking for dirt on McGovern's ties to the Communist Party, and evidence that would lead to the two prostitution rings, ran by the DNC, in a building across from the Watergate building (per G. Gordon Liddy). Nixon was being spied upon by the DNC, and the Communist Party, within the US, and they were looking to set him up. It was Nixon who added the vox tape recorder to the Oval Office in 1970, to keep a record of everything said, because of the left spying on him. That way, they couldn't lie about anything stated in the White House, or threaten him. Under Obama, they used the Patriot Act to spy on the right, and unmask names. They also concocted a lie about Russians. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/07/29/Watergate-burglars-sought-McGovern-links-to-communists/6332459921600/ Here's where it gets interesting. It was the FBI who informed Nixon, about the prostitution rings. When Mark Felt (Deep Throat) wasn't selected for the director of the FBI, he ran to the Washington Post. Felt was a leaker, sound familiar? Felt was also involved in exposing COINTELPRO. While at Yale, Hillary Clinton clerked for a Californian law firm, ran by two known and admitted communists. Also, her and Bill were campaigning for McGovern. At the Democratic National Convention, it was the communists who started a fight, and a riot, led by none other than Bill Ayers, who was backing McGovern. Later, Hillary was put on the special prosecutor's team, for Watergate, not long after graduating. She was booted out of the team for unethical behavior. The prosecutor stated that her ideology was to deny Nixon his constitution rights. She didn't have a law license then, nor could she ever pass the bar in DC. After this, was when many Democrat politicians moved from the far-left to center. Now, though, they've moved back to where they were under Johnson. Many of them are preaching the same New Communist Movement rhetoric. The press tells nothing truthful about Watergate, leaving a mountain of fact out of it. Read G. Gordon Liddy's book: "Will." It's an eye opener.
    1
  9807. 1
  9808. 1
  9809. 1
  9810. 1
  9811. 1
  9812. 1
  9813. 1
  9814. 1
  9815. 1
  9816.  @poempadgett4664  That was the reason why I mentioned the economy, as the Scramble for Africa and oil exploration was taking place as well, but the war was mainly over what was taking place inside Germany in politics, where socialism was being allowed to advance by Wilhelm, and then, Ebert, which the capitalist nations wanted to stop. That was before Antifa was later formed in 1932, where they actually had both the socialists and national socialists trying to work together at first, until the nationals split, and left Antifa. "It was set up by the then-Stalinist Communist Party of Germany (KPD) during the late history of the Weimar Republic. After the forced dissolution in the wake of Machtergreifung in 1933, the movement went underground." There were several types of socialism in Germany during that time, with the worst of it being led by Rosa Luxenburg and Karl Liebknecht. Ebert was at the head of the milder form of it with the SPD, when the hardliners had their uprising. The SPD goes back to 1913. "In August 1914, Luxemburg, along with Karl Liebknecht, Clara Zetkin, and Franz Mehring, founded the Die Internationale ("The International") group which became the Spartacus League in January 1916." "In response to the uprising, Luxemburg's former student, German Chancellor and SPD leader Friedrich Ebert ordered the Freikorps to suppress the Soviet backed attempt at revolution, which was successfully crushed by 11 January 1919." Ebert didn't seem to like their totalitarian views, but they got them, anyhow, with the NSDAP later on.
    1
  9817. 1
  9818. 1
  9819. 1
  9820. 1
  9821. 1
  9822. Progressivism is nothing but slow-burn socialism, which leads to its creators, the Fabian Socialists. The Fabians admitted that their plan was to slowly install socialism, worldwide, over time. The Progressives are the "new socialist" politicians, or the neocons and neoliberals, and the major difference between this lot and the Communists is that the Communists demand radical change immediately, setting up a system similar to feudalism, through anarchy and violent protest, whereas the Progressives wish to slowly bring it about, which they have, now, over the past hundred years, and they pretty much succeeded in doing everything they set out to do. It started with the socialists on Wallstreet and their friends in London, who pretty much pulled off a coup with the murder of William McKinley, and their installation of Theodore Roosevelt. The Roosevelt family are Dutch nobility, and they married into the DuPonts, Delanos, and Astors. One can look at the Roosevelts history with socialism, especially with Clinton Roosevelt and Horace Greely's support of Karl Marx in New York. The Roosevelt family had even practiced endogamy, (marrying nieces and close cousins), much like the Rothschilds, to keep their money within the family. Starting with Teddy Roosevelt, onward, their progressive ideology more matches that of National Socialism, which is why many politicians, bankers, and industrialists in the US, and in Britain, backed the Nazi Party. One will soon learn that Wallstreet, via the CFR, rules at Pennsylvania Avenue and that the national interest equates to national corporate interest. The entire socialist-progressive globalist plan revolves around international corporations, international trade, and international banking. That is why they wish for no national sovereignty, no borders, and a one-world government. They could care less about human rights. This is why you see the heads of large corporations seated at the UN having discussions about trade and politics, and that is why the EU, the UN's firstborn, was created. The EU's idea came from the Nazis Neuordnung Europas (New Order of Europe), which incorporated Kalergi's synarchy plan. Both organizations (UN and EU) are cleverly hidden international trade and banking apparatuses, where the IMF, the World Bank, The BIS, and the Federal Reserve are intimately tied together.
    1
  9823. 1
  9824. 1
  9825. 1
  9826. 1
  9827. 1
  9828. 1
  9829. 1
  9830. 1
  9831. 1
  9832. 1
  9833. 1
  9834. 1
  9835. 1
  9836. 1
  9837. 1
  9838. The root of all prejudice is about the personality, and not the so-called race or breeding. However, sadly, some have claimed that if a handful within a group acts in a certain manner, then everyone within that group must act that way. That seems to always lead back to some within the elite and the academe, with academics who like to not only divide society to the most minute degree, but pigeonhole everyone within a group, with a certain character. Thus, when those academic's papers or books were or are published about race, groups, or caste, and others read them, many in society believe their claims, because they believe that it's from an authoritative academic source. In reality, it has an ulterior motive. . The academics who do or did this, always feel themselves to be of the elite, and they claim that everyone under them, who are not in their group, are different; mostly over the way a small handful has acted within a lower caste or group. For instance, if a starving person in a group stole food to survive, then some within the academe, at one time, labeled the entire group as being apt to theft. Books and papers published by academics, about racial makeup and IQ, and group characteristics over the years, are good examples. That is the root of so-called racism and the group or caste system. First, the academe divided the public into many parts, and they continue to do so. . What I truly believe is behind it, and this goes back thousands of years, is wealth and power. Those at the top of the pyramid love wealth, as well as the power that it brings, and they try to keep that extreme wealth and power within a small elite pool over competition. They would intermarry with other elite over wealth and power, to gain more, and they would also practice endogamy and inbreeding to keep that wealth and power within the family. They also have the belief of stopping those outside their group from gaining wealth and power, which competes with them, thus they publish propaganda to divide the so-called lower castes or groups under them. If you divide everyone under you, and have them fighting with each other all the time, it's very hard for these groups to advance and compete with you. . Think of all the ignorant protesters, now, who, instead of studying and trying to advance themselves, fight other groups all the time, over "oppression." They've bought into the elite's propaganda, and believe what it says, because, today, it seems, the academe has done a one-eighty, and they now fan the flames of hatred between the very groups and castes that they created beforehand. Those at the top want everyone else divided, as they reap the benefits.
    1
  9839. 1
  9840. 1
  9841. 1
  9842. 1
  9843. 1
  9844. 1
  9845. 1
  9846. 1
  9847. 1
  9848. 1
  9849. 1
  9850. 1
  9851. 1
  9852. 1
  9853. 1
  9854. 1
  9855. 1
  9856. 1
  9857. 1
  9858. 1
  9859. 1
  9860. 1
  9861. 1
  9862. 1
  9863. 1
  9864. 1
  9865. 1
  9866. 1
  9867. 1
  9868. 1
  9869. 1
  9870. 1
  9871.  @magnusarsland6887  "The World Federalist Movement is a movement that advocates for strengthened and democratic "world institutions" subjected to the "federalist principles" of subsidiarity, solidarity [combining] and democracy." "The first world federalist organization was founded in 1937 by two famous feminists, pacifists, and female suffragists [hard left]: Schwimmer and Lloyd. In 1938, the Federal Union was organized in the United Kingdom. In the U.S., Federal Union (now: Association to Unite the Democracies) [combine them] was established in 1939 calling for a federation of the Atlantic democracies. The Swiss Internationale Bewegung der Weltföderalisten-Schweiz was created in Geneva in 1940. During World War II, anti-fascist resistance movements [communists] shared clandestinely circulated copies of Spinelli's plan for European federation and "global federation." Spinelli later became one of the founding fathers of the European Union. In 1945, the Committee to Frame a World Constitution convened at the University of Chicago and drafted a Constitution for the World. In 1947, five small world federalist organizations came together in Asheville, North Carolina, and agreed to merge as the United World Federalists. "These five groups had, in the previous year, met with representatives of fifteen others in Bern and Hertenstein (Weggis) to discuss creating a worldwide federalist organization. It was one year later, in August 1947, in Montreux, that more than 51 organizations from 24 countries came together at the Conference of the World Movement for World Federal Government (WMFWG). The Conference concluded with the Montreux Declaration." The declaration: "Montreux Declaration (23 August 1947) " "We world federalists meeting in Montreux at the first international congress of the "World Movement for World Federal Government", call upon the peoples of the world to join us in our work." "Federalists had hoped that the anticipated UN review conference (under Article 109 of the UN Charter) in 1955 would move the UN further in the direction of a world federal system. Unfortunately, the lack of political will dissipated any interest in such a conference. Around 1965 however, the Movement had established offices near the United Nations, with American federalist, McVitty, as the Movement's UN observer and advocate. "Some federalists in this period focused on amendments to the United Nations Charter as a way forward. Most involved reforms to institutions such as a more representative Security Council, a World Court with compulsory jurisdiction and judicial review authority and a democratically elected General Assembly (or a world parliament). Federalists proposed a number of new institutions such as a commission on "sustainable development," an "international development authority," a "standing peacekeeping corps" [military] and an "international criminal court." "Notably active world federalist organizations, as of 2019, exist in Australia, Argentina, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States." The same states that are now causing all the problems, and from within the UN.
    1
  9872. 1
  9873. 1
  9874. 1
  9875. 1
  9876. 1
  9877. 1
  9878. 1
  9879. 1
  9880. 1
  9881. 1
  9882. 1
  9883. 1
  9884. 1
  9885. 1
  9886. 1
  9887. 1
  9888. 1
  9889. 1
  9890. 1
  9891. 1
  9892. 1
  9893. 1
  9894. 1
  9895. Karl Marx's ideology, plus Cecil Rhodes concept of British empire, created Rhodes idea of globalism, and he left his entire fortune to implement it. Lord Milner executed his will to fund a secret society of the rich elite, and bankers, to implement their plan. He started the Rhodes scholarship to pick it's leaders. The truth about it all, can be found in two academic history books, written by Dr. Carroll Quigley, Professor of Western Civilization and History, at Georgetown University. Quigley taught Bill Clinton, and Clinton received a Rhodes Scholarship. Even though Quigley revealed this secret cabal, he agreed with Rhodes globalist plan. Milner's Group was behind starting the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and it's sister in the US, the Council on Foreign Relations. It also led to the League of Nations, and the UN. NATO is entwined with it all. If people really want to learn of the truth, about what has been slowly taking place, since 1900, there are two academic history books published by Dr. Quigley, and they are "The Anglo-American Establishment," and "Tragedy and Hope." However, you'll have to find the first edition of Tragedy and Hope, as it was censored, though I believe it was finally reprinted in full. In them, you will find out the truth about "Milner's Kindergarten," how the US became involved during the Wilson Administration, and how the US took over the lead on socialist globalism after WWII. It is within both political parties, and I think those on here can pick out the politicians behind it. It also leads to the "New Communist Movement," which is still alive.
    1
  9896. 1
  9897. 1
  9898. 1
  9899. 1
  9900. The politicians are controlled, in the US and the UK, by a cabal or society of industrialists and bankers. They have been controlled since 1900, especially after 1902, out of New York City and their sister society in Britain at Cliveden. Their front group call themselves "Pilgrims." This cabal controls members on both sides of the aisle, and they control the purse of both nations, their credit. France is also controlled by this very lot. The politicians control the upper echelon of the agencies. That is the "deep state" and the cabal behind them. The State Department is intimately involved with this cabal, and every new US Ambassador to Britain becomes a member (a Pilgrim). That is the "Anglo-American Establishment," and in reality, it is the largest organized crime syndicate in the world, involved in politics and banking, and they are protected by the governments of the US and Britain, which sprang from the loins of the old monopoly companies chartered by the British Crown. It is the "Gordian Knot" that controls it all. Comey worked for HSBC. Does anyone know the history of this bank, and what it was founded for? What was HSBC convicted of doing, while Comey was working for them? What ties do the Clintons have to this cabal? What business did FDR's grandfather, Warren Delano, make his money at? As the world turns. Trump knows, and they know that he knows. Does anyone wonder why they want him gone? Trump is not playing the game. If you only knew the truth of it all. "If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched."__GHW Bush (1992) The public lays it on secret societies, except that the ones that they name have nothing at all to do with it. They are Inferior secret societies that everyone knows about, and anyone can join, which are innocent (Freemasonry, the Rotary, Oddfellows, etc). Next, there are the intermediary secret societies that have a completely different structure, and they're invite only, which many haven't heard of, but one in particular calls themselves Pilgrims (a front group),.and they are controlled by the next group that I'll mention, which is a superior society, that is kept hidden, and the general public hardly knows anything about them. They may have only a few hundred members, all ultra-wealthy elitists (bankers and industrialists). This last group is what the British public called the Cliveden Set or Milner's Group. Nobody knows its real name. Research the "Round Table Movement," which still exists. See this old NYT article: https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1902/04/09/101945773.pdf
    1
  9901. 1
  9902. 1
  9903. 1
  9904. 1
  9905. 1
  9906. 1
  9907. 1
  9908. 1
  9909. 1
  9910. 1
  9911. 1
  9912. 1
  9913. 1
  9914. 1
  9915. 1
  9916. 1
  9917. 1
  9918. 1
  9919. 1
  9920. Did you ever question the sudden shift (over 10 years) in the youth's culture in England between the 1950s and 60s? What was really behind that shift, and what entity or entities was or were promoting it? It was blamed for the shift in the US over the new rock bands (Beetles) and exported cultural ideas. However, I think that was only a small part of it, and a mere symptom of a plan that was being pushed by both religion and university, as well as an infiltration of the state, itself, in the UK and the US. This leads back to socialism, and especially, Christian Socialism, which was being pushed by the Anglican church, and then their universities, from the early 1800s on. That didn't make it to the US until the late 1800s, in Boston, where it spread into NYC, and settled at Columbia U. That was when the first social science schools were formed stateside, and I'd venture to guess that the same thing occurred in Canada and Australia. Read the Wiki article about the Rand School of Social Science, especially the history section, and start following the links back through time. What culturally happens in Merry Ol' England always finds its way to the US and Canada at a later date, and I believe that you'll find a "Working Man's College" in London behind the start of it, though it leads back to the enclosure of the commons if you wish to pursue it that far back. Certain graduates from that London college found their way inside Oxford and Cambridge, and that began the cultural change in the graduates that have been causing this upset ever since.
    1
  9921. Jean Sweeny: All of this, believe it or not, about the climate and trade, goes back to Nixon and the creation of "Earth Day." Under Nixon, the "Library Group" was created, which became the G5, G7, G7+1, G8, and G20. Nixon tore down Bretton Woods and GATT, devalued the dollar, and not only went to China about new trade, he sent Rockefeller and Kissinger there. Everybody said Nixon was Kissinger's puppet. The migration of US manufacturing began into China. Nixon's "plumbers" were selected out of counterintelligence, that GHW Bush was temporarily over as the director of the C_A. Bush was involved with counterintelligence for several years before that. This is the roots of global warming, climate change, and the green new deal, as well as free trade, and China. Reagan, at the UN, mentioned a NWO. Bush was the VP. Bush becomes president, mentions his NWO, which the CFR calls the "liberal international order" that is now the G20. At the Earth Summit, at Rio, in 1992, Bush signed on the dotted line for global warming and the environmentalist UN agenda. This is the first of three meetings, 1992, 2002, and 2012, which are called the Rio+20. 2022 was supposed to be the fourth. The agendas are Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. It's about climate change, but hidden within is about giving the UN more power, social justice, and redistribution of wealth. They wanted their climate agendas in operation by 2021, before the meeting in 2022. The TPP would have brought all of this together. Trump canned this in January 2017, by EO. He also pulled the US out of the climate agenda at the Paris Accord. Trump promised to do this very thing during his campaign. After Bush: Clinton becomes president, and they bring in NAFTA, or the North American Union. Clinton and Gore began to push the global warming/climate change agenda of the UN. The WTO is created in 1995, I believe,, and China joins it around 2001. China is a member of the G20. China is a member of the Asian Union called ASEAN, and heads it. Europe is within the European Union. NAFTA, the EU, and ASEAN are the three trade unions, all tied together. The TPP was connected to them. From Nixon to Obama, every president has supported this globalist agenda. The China cabal, which is now coming to light, is China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. It has always been the UN/G20/China cabal behind the election interference, and the scheme to depose a sitting president. That is why he has never gotten on with them. They used counterintelligence and their outside "contractors," such as the Russian mafia (oligarchs), US mafia, and the Triads in Hong Kong, to do it.
    1
  9922. Jean Sweeny: Sadly, the elite clique, consisting of families from old money, and the nouveau riche (Silicon Valley, etc) are not like us, and they see themselves as above us. They think themselves to be aristocrats and above the law. They also think that the public should have no say in government, and that intellectuals should make the decisions (Saint-Simon ideology). The general public, millionaires to the poor, are cattle to them. If you do not have a net worth of $100 million, the elite will not give you the time of day, even though their families made their money by connections to this government and other governments. They hold no allegiance to the US, and Mammon is their god. I'm sure that some CEOs are now in distant countries, especially the islands, living in private villas, waiting out this storm. They do not care if we, the public, lives or dies. Worse, many of them wish for depopulation, which is part of the UN's sustainable development agenda. They will work with any government, regardless of their politics and atrocities, if money is to be made. They knew what they were signing up for, when they moved their manufacturing to Communist China, and before that, to Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Since Woodrow Wilson, we've had politicians in both political parties helping the elite do this, and those politicians were fully aware of what was taking place. During WWII, the OSS helped train and arm both Mao and Ho Chi Minh, which is an open secret. The Soviets were our allies, and US companies built their manufacturing base under Stalin. There is no realizing for the ultra-wealthy elite, as they knew beforehand. It is the general public that has been brainwashed by propaganda, and they will have to be reeducated and exposed to the truth. Some hard truths are coming for the public, and it will be hard to swallow for many of them.
    1
  9923. 1
  9924. 1
  9925. 1
  9926. 1
  9927. 1
  9928. 1
  9929. 1
  9930. 1
  9931. 1
  9932. 1
  9933. 1
  9934. 1
  9935. It's according to what the media's definition of "world stability" is. To be very honest, that definition is the globalist agenda, and the POTUS is the proverbial turd in the punch bowl. The EU was the start of it, Napoleon's dream come true, and the big push to complete it started when the Bush and Clinton administrations joined forces with Blair in the UK. They worked with ex-Nazis, all radical socialists, in Europe, the UK, and the US. The EU was a US and UK creation, as one EU politician admitted shortly after President Trump was elected. I'll paraphrase: "What are we going to do now, (after Trump), the EU is a US and UK creation?" The idea of the European, Asian, and a North American Unions are a creation of the power elite to enrich themselves by skirting taxes, tariffs, laws, and regulations. It was also a worker replacement scheme, bringing back a form of slavery, and the slaves would vote for their masters. That is the "thousand points of light," and the "new world order" that has been spoken about (and quoted) by many politicians. The World Brotherhood, the UN, and the Atlantic Council at work. They lost control, and they put into place the biggest propaganda effort against the world starting in 2013. Never trust the merchants, merchant banks, and industrialists. Does anyone remember who helped the Ayatollah take control of Iran? It was Jimmy Carter, the same US president that said Jim Jones was a fantastic preacher. Jim Jones was a flaming communist, that run a cult of personality and kept his followers in a concentration camp at Guyana. The NWO, three empires made up of a North American Union under FDR's New Deal Socialism, the EU under National Socialism, and the Asian under Communism. As professor Quigley put it, a balance of power scheme, run by socialists but controlled by merchants, merchant bankers, and industrialists. What family is the largest merchant banker on earth? Who controls the central banks, and the BIS? You can almost count them on one hand.
    1
  9936. 1
  9937. 1
  9938. 1
  9939. 1
  9940. 1
  9941. 1
  9942. 1
  9943. 1
  9944. 1
  9945. 1
  9946. 1
  9947. 1
  9948. 1
  9949. 1
  9950. 1
  9951. 1
  9952. I believe it was pre-Marx, but the man thought to have coined the English word, Communism, John Goodwyn Barmby, did start a Communist Church. "John Goodwyn Barmby (Bapt. 12 November 1820–1881) was born at Yoxford in Suffolk and educated at Woodbridge School. He was an English Victorian utopian socialist thinker. He and his wife Catherine Barmby (died 1853/1854) were influential supporters of Robert Owen in the late 1830s and early 1840s before moving into the radical Unitarian stream of Christianity in the 1840s. Both had established reputations as staunch feminists and proposed the addition of women's suffrage to the demands of the Chartist movement. "Barmby was involved as an editor, writer, and organiser of communitarian ventures around London from 1838 to 1848. He is often associated with the growth of socialist and utopian projects during the rise of Chartism. He founded a utopian community on the Channel Islands and at times corresponded with radicals including William James Linton and Friedrich Engels. "Barmby is also known as the person who claimed to have introduced the word communist into the English language as a translation of the French word communiste during a visit to Paris in 1840 in conversation with some followers of Gracchus Babeuf. He introduced Engels to the French communiste movement. They founded the London Communist Propaganda Society in 1841 and in the same year the Universal Communitarian Association. Barmby founded the Communist Chronicle, a monthly newspaper later published by Thomas Frost. By 1843, the Barmbys had recast their movement as a church. The term "communism" was used slightly later, but certainly by the 1840s. As Donald F. Busky wrote, "Barmby may have thought that he invented the words communism and communist, but he was mistaken ... [In all probability [communist and communism were in use] by the 1830s or 1840s.'" France was full of cults at the time of the revolution, and Babeuf was a provider of terror. Mandela was merely one from a long line of them.
    1
  9953. 1
  9954. 1
  9955. 1
  9956. 1
  9957. 1
  9958. 1
  9959. 1
  9960. 1
  9961. 1
  9962. 1
  9963. 1
  9964. Harris and Biden are the puppets of the UN and G7/G20, nothing more. That is the cabal that has been behind everything corrupt since both organs were founded, and coincidentally, each grew exponentially under Nixon, as both the VP and President. Nixon was a Wilsonian, and under he and Ike, they stepped on the accelerator of the UN and NATO over the Atlantic Charter's promises. . When Nixon became president, he was making good use of a very black clandestine group that he was over creating as the VP. From that group came the plumbers, and GHW Bush, who was made the Ambassador to the UN in 1971. Next, in 1973, he was made the head of the RNC, and in 1974, the 2nd Chief of the U.S. Liaison Office to the People's Republic of China under Ford. That was the death knell of the old GOP. It was Nixon, who everyone said was Rockefeller and Kissinger's puppet that started courting Mao. It was part of the globalist plan to redistribute wealth, raising third-world nations up to be the same. A hare-brained scheme. In reality, it was about using them for cheap labor, and a place industry could hide from the new EPA regulations, and labor unions. It was under Nixon, after all, that both "Earth Day," and the EPA were created. Industry had to have a reason to leave, so Nixon and his group created it. . Under Nixon, the G5 was created at the White House, and that grew to become the G7, and the G20. That is the "Liberal International Economic Order," or Bush's NWO. It was Bush that signed the US up for the UN's "sustainable development" scheme at Rio in 1992. Clinton and Gore run with that, shouting global warming! . When you read the eight points of the Atlantic Charter, you can quickly see how it's all about Wilsonian socialism, "free trade," and money. . No territorial gains were to be sought by the United States or the United Kingdom; Territorial adjustments must be in accord with the wishes of the peoples concerned; All people had a right to self-determination; Trade barriers were to be lowered; There was to be global economic co-operation and advancement of social welfare; The participants would work for a world free of want and fear; The participants would work for freedom of the seas; There was to be disarmament of aggressor nations, and a common disarmament after the war. . The entire UN was based off those eight points, where it became the world body for socialism. From Truman to Obama, each president, regardless of political party, has advanced this globalist cabal, except two, JFK, and the President now in office.
    1
  9965. 1
  9966. 1
  9967. 1
  9968. 1
  9969. 1
  9970. 1
  9971. 1
  9972. 1
  9973. 1
  9974. 1
  9975. 1
  9976. 1
  9977. 1
  9978. 1
  9979. 1
  9980. 1
  9981. 1
  9982. 1
  9983. 1
  9984. 1
  9985. 1
  9986. 1
  9987. 1
  9988. 1
  9989. 1
  9990. 1
  9991. 1
  9992. 1
  9993. 1
  9994. 1
  9995. 1
  9996. 1
  9997. 1
  9998. 1
  9999. 1
  10000. 1
  10001. 1
  10002. 1
  10003. 1
  10004. 1
  10005. 1
  10006. 1
  10007. 1
  10008. 1
  10009. 1
  10010. 1
  10011. 1
  10012. 1
  10013. 1
  10014. 1
  10015. 1
  10016. 1
  10017. 1
  10018. 1
  10019. 1
  10020. 1
  10021. 1
  10022. 1
  10023. 1
  10024. 1
  10025. 1
  10026. 1
  10027. 1
  10028. 1
  10029. 1
  10030. 1
  10031. 1
  10032. 1
  10033. 1
  10034. 1
  10035. 1
  10036. 1
  10037. 1
  10038. 1
  10039. 1
  10040. 1
  10041. 1
  10042. 1
  10043. 1
  10044. 1
  10045. 1
  10046. 1
  10047. 1
  10048. 1
  10049. 1
  10050. 1
  10051. 1
  10052. 1
  10053. 1
  10054. 1
  10055. 1
  10056. Ceridwen: There will not be any war, except economic, I believe. What he may do is take out leading terrorists, and repay in kind for their attacks. Trump does it by economic warfare. What is going on, now, is removing the infiltration in the US, especially in academia. It's about intellectual secrets theft, and China's control over secondary education. You can find this on the DOJ News website. Iran is a little dog in the cabal. The cabal is an alliance between China, Russia, Iran, and NK. There is an Asian union of sorts, the ACD, which is tied to several other Asian economic unions, similar to the EU. China is at the head of it. This four-nation cabal has already been identified in several news articles. It is all tied to one belt and one road, as well as globalism. This is the cabal trying to damage the west, and the corruption is rampant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia_Cooperation_Dialogue Go back and read the history of the Red-Green-Brown Alliance and the Reform Party. Read what Trump stated about it in 2000, as he tested the waters. It became the far left, the far right, and the environmentalists that made an alliance. This is also the radical group that is doing the political attacks. They tried to form a similar group in the UK, too. "Trump ultimately withdrew his candidacy. During an appearance on The Today Show, he stated: 'The Reform Party is a total mess! You have Buchanan, a right winger, and you have Fulani, a Communist, and they have merged.... I don't know what you have!.'"__Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Reform_Party_presidential_primaries
    1
  10057. 1
  10058. 1
  10059. 1
  10060. 1
  10061. 1
  10062. 1
  10063. 1
  10064. 1
  10065. 1
  10066. 1
  10067. 1
  10068. 1
  10069. 1
  10070. 1
  10071. 1
  10072. 1
  10073. 1
  10074. 1
  10075. 1
  10076. 1
  10077. 1
  10078. 1
  10079. 1
  10080. 1
  10081. 1
  10082. 1
  10083. 1
  10084. 1
  10085. 1
  10086. 1
  10087. 1
  10088. 1
  10089. 1
  10090. 1
  10091. 1
  10092. 1
  10093. 1
  10094. 1
  10095. 1
  10096. 1
  10097. 1
  10098. 1
  10099. 1
  10100. 1
  10101. 1
  10102. 1
  10103. 1
  10104. 1
  10105. 1
  10106. 1
  10107. 1
  10108. 1
  10109. 1
  10110. 1
  10111. 1
  10112. 1
  10113. 1
  10114. 1
  10115. 1
  10116. 1
  10117. 1
  10118. 1
  10119. 1
  10120. 1
  10121. 1
  10122. 1
  10123. 1
  10124. 1
  10125. 1
  10126. 1
  10127. 1
  10128. 1
  10129. 1
  10130. 1
  10131. 1
  10132. 1
  10133. 1
  10134. 1
  10135. 1
  10136. 1
  10137. 1
  10138. 1
  10139. 1
  10140. 1
  10141. 1
  10142. 1
  10143. 1
  10144. 1
  10145. 1
  10146. 1
  10147. 1
  10148. 1
  10149. 1
  10150. 1
  10151. 1
  10152. 1
  10153. 1
  10154. 1
  10155. 1
  10156. 1
  10157. 1
  10158. 1
  10159. 1
  10160. 1
  10161. 1
  10162. 1
  10163. 1
  10164. 1
  10165. 1
  10166.  @atex6175  I'm speaking of Nixon's entire career, especially from when he was an attorney in California (think mob). Here's what occurred: "Eisenhower gave Nixon responsibilities during his term as vice president—more than any previous vice president. Nixon attended Cabinet and National Security Council meetings and chaired them when Eisenhower was absent. A 1953 tour of the Far East succeeded in increasing local goodwill toward the United States and prompted Nixon to appreciate the potential of the region as an industrial center. He visited Saigon and Hanoi in French Indochina. On his return to the United States at the end of 1953, Nixon increased the amount of time he devoted to foreign relations."_Wikipedia Nixon had ties to the mob. During WWII, the government worked with the mob under Operation Underworld. Nixon, as the VP, created the Forty Committee, and Operation Forty, which were the dirty tricks and black bag operations in the government's new counterintel departments aimed at stopping communism. I support most of that, but not all of what they did, such as the blackmail racket. He was also involved with Robert Maheu, and Robert Vesco, all mob related, and tied to Operation 40. Here, they began using cutouts to work with the mob, especially in both South and Central America, and in the Caribbean. Essentially, we created the Russian oligarchs, who were the Russian mob, and who were used to overthrow the USSR. When Nixon became president, they started flooding into the US, and settled in Brooklyn and elsewhere. They tried to do a similar thing in China, but look how that turned out. This is also where the huge money laundering, and offshore banking web was created. Iran-Contra and several other escapades were tied to this, and globalism was birthed here, especially after Nixon and Kissinger went to China. The shock doctrine came from them as well. Kissinger and his lot has much to do with it. Worse, Ike and Nixon were the UN's first picks, and both backed the New Deal. They were progressives, and were the beginning of Neoconservative (New Right) politics taking over the GOP. The old conservative coalition had kicked the progressives out between 1910-1912. After 1952, they took control. After this, both political parties were infested with progressivism.
    1
  10167.  @atex6175  Oh, they're all corrupt, and people in both parties are working together, which is why we're witnessing what we are. They're putting the UN's agenda (2030) into operation as we speak. The worst, and most insidious thing that they did was to create the riots. They were hoping that the right would rise up, and bring out their guns. That didn't happen. If it would have happened, the UN's gun grab would begin, and they're trying their best to do it anyhow. You can find what the UN has planned on two webpages they have titled: A New Era of Conflict and Violence, and another titled: Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet. "There has been a sizeable increase in the number of attacks carried out by actors with far-right, white nationalist, or anti-Muslim beliefs in both Western Europe and North America in the past two decades. The number of incidents across the two regions increased from three in 2002 to 59 in 2017, with social media playing a crucial role in the dissemination of xenophobic speech and incitement to violence." Also: "The main strategies to prevent disputes from escalating into conflict, and to prevent the recurrence of conflict, are preventive diplomacy and preventive disarmament." "Complementing preventive diplomacy is preventive disarmament, which seeks to reduce the number of small arms in conflict-prone regions. In El Salvador, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Timor-Leste and elsewhere, this has entailed demobilizing combat forces, as well as collecting and destroying their weapons as part of an overall peace agreement. Destroying yesterday’s weapons prevents their use in tomorrow’s wars." They're chomping at the bit to label citizens as DVE's, to take full control.
    1
  10168. 1
  10169. 1
  10170. 1
  10171. 1
  10172. 1
  10173. 1
  10174. 1
  10175. 1
  10176. 1
  10177. 1
  10178. 1
  10179. 1
  10180. 1
  10181. 1
  10182. 1
  10183. 1
  10184. 1
  10185. 1
  10186. 1
  10187. 1
  10188. 1
  10189. 1
  10190. 1
  10191. 1
  10192. Ask yourself, were those so-called hackers Russian Russians, or British Russians? Isn't Britain a foreign state and did they work with HRC and Hussein to rig the US election? What is FVEY? What country is the umbrella that Pakistan is still under? Who are the Awans? What country set the entire Russian narrative in motion? What umbrella is Austrailia under? What nations are under the Commonwealth of Nations? Where did the Russian oligarchs flee? Do any Russians work for GCHQ? Do any Russians have ties to GCHQ's Cybersecurity division? What training did GCHQ give internet trolls in 2014? Why? Where did McCain travel to? Where did Page and Strzok travel to? Why do Hussein, HRC, and Kerry travel to New Zealand? What is the Roundtable Group? What is The Club in London? Where is Orbis? Is Orbis close to GCHQ's Cybersecurity building? Who is Christopher Steeler? Where was Steele stationed at before coming back to Britain? What if some in Britain had been working with Russia since WWI? What if some in the US have been? What is the Pilgrims Society? What is the Society of the Elect? What is the Roundtable Group/Cliveden Set and the Golden Triangle? What are the CFR and RIIA? Since 1900, what has every war been about? Natural Resources, especially oil? Does HSBC, Bank of America, Citibank, JP Morgan, Oppenheimer, Rothschilds/Schiff, BCCI, the Vatican Bank, and the Bank of England have any connections? Why do the Saudis get along swimmingly with Israel? Who were the Zionists, the Domneh, and the Sephardi Jews? You have way more than you know.
    1
  10193. 1
  10194. The POTUS' Florida campaign speech in October 2016. Read carefully: "The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election. As an example, just one single trade deal they'd like to pass involves trillions of dollars controlled by many countries, corporations, and lobbyists. "For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interests, they partner with these people that don't have your good in mind. Our campaign represents a true existential threat, like they haven't seen before. This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government. The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry. The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, China, and other countries all around the world. "Our just-announced job numbers are anemic. Our gross domestic product, or GDP, is barely above 1 percent and going down. Workers in the United States are making less than they were almost 20 years ago, and yet they are working harder, but so am I, working harder. That I can tell you. It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities. "Just look at what this corrupt establishment has done to cities like Detroit, and Flint, Michigan, and rural towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, and all across our country. Take a look at what's going on. They've stripped away these towns bare and raided the wealth for themselves and taken our jobs away, out of our country, never to return unless I'm elected president. The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. "We've seen this firsthand in the WikiLeaks documents in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends, and her donors.”
    1
  10195. 1
  10196. 1
  10197. 1
  10198. 1
  10199. 1
  10200. 1
  10201. 1
  10202. 1
  10203. 1
  10204. 1
  10205. 1
  10206. 1
  10207. 1
  10208. 1
  10209. 1
  10210. 1
  10211. 1
  10212. 1
  10213. 1
  10214. 1
  10215. 1
  10216. 1
  10217. 1
  10218. 1
  10219. 1
  10220. 1
  10221. 1
  10222. 1
  10223. 1
  10224. 1
  10225. 1
  10226. 1
  10227. 1
  10228. 1
  10229. 1
  10230. 1
  10231. 1
  10232. 1
  10233. 1
  10234. 1
  10235. 1
  10236. 1
  10237. 1
  10238. 1
  10239. 1
  10240. 1
  10241. 1
  10242. 1
  10243. 1
  10244. 1
  10245. 1
  10246. 1
  10247. 1
  10248. 1
  10249. 1
  10250. 1
  10251. 1
  10252. 1
  10253. 1
  10254. 1
  10255. 1
  10256. 1
  10257. 1
  10258. 1
  10259. 1
  10260. 1
  10261. 1
  10262. 1
  10263. When the public realizes that the progressive neos, on both sides, are the same old corrupt crony capitalists of yore, (ye auld Federalists raising their ugly heads again), which have been spoken of for years, then they will "get the picture." Crony capitalism, expansionism, imperialism, and the caste system at its best. The public is unaware of how complicit the Roosevelts and Astors were with Britain, and the aristocracy, especially about US involvement in WWII. Then, there was the intermarrying of the British aristocrat's daughters to wealthy US robber barons. This association goes back even farther, to the 1890s, with Rhodes and the Roosevelts, and those in bed with the crown. The Federalists are why Jefferson created the Republican Party, earlier, in the first place. Socialism is appealing to the Federalists, as its all about a big brother government, and control. Through law, they removed themselves out of the tax system, with scams such as foundations, etc. During the Congress of Vienna , in 1814-15, the aristocrats of Prussia, Russia, and Austria swore to stomp out Republicanism one day, though it's claimed that Britain didn't agree at that time. Of course, Britain was also in the middle of signing the Treaty of Ghent (Dec. 1814) at the same time, stopping the War of 1812. Out of all the so-called free and democratic nations of the west, which nation has nationalized the most corporations? Britain? What about the US? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nationalizations_by_country
    1
  10264. 1
  10265. 1
  10266. 1
  10267. 1
  10268. 1
  10269. 1
  10270. 1
  10271. 1
  10272. 1
  10273. 1
  10274. 1
  10275. 1
  10276. 1
  10277. 1
  10278. 1
  10279. 1
  10280. 1
  10281. 1
  10282. 1
  10283. 1
  10284. 1
  10285. 1
  10286. 1
  10287. 1
  10288. 1
  10289. 1
  10290. 1
  10291. 1
  10292. 1
  10293. 1
  10294. 1
  10295. 1
  10296. 1
  10297. 1
  10298. 1
  10299. 1
  10300. 1
  10301. 1
  10302. 1
  10303. 1
  10304. 1
  10305. 1
  10306. 1
  10307. 1
  10308. 1
  10309. 1
  10310. 1
  10311. 1
  10312. 1
  10313. 1
  10314. 1
  10315. 1
  10316. 1
  10317. 1
  10318. 1
  10319. 1
  10320. 1
  10321. 1
  10322. 1
  10323. 1
  10324. 1
  10325. 1
  10326. 1
  10327. Back around 2000, it was known that self-proclaimed communists joined forces with the neo-nazis and environmentalists. Trump exposed them on the Today Show. They not only infiltrated, but took control of, the Reform Pary. This is the same party that Perot founded, but refused to run under it again. However, Trump was asked to run under it, some say, by Gov. Ventura. He quickly left after the California vote. "Trump considered himself a conservative, but criticized Pat Buchanan, saying: 'I'm on the conservative side, but Buchanan is Attila the Hun.' He withdrew from the race citing the party's infighting, as did Jesse Ventura and the Minnesota Reform Party. Donald Trump stated: 'So the Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.'" "Pat Buchanan decided to leave the Republican Party because: 'The Republican Party at the national level has ceased to be my party. This divorce began around the end of the Cold War when President (George H W) Bush declared it to be a New World-order party and began intervening all over the world. While he and I were allies and friends during the Cold War, I just felt that once the Cold War was over the United States should return to a more traditional non-intervention foreign policy.'" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America President Trump has never supported the NWO (UN-G20- China cabal), and he is nowhere as far-right as Buchanan. Buchanan is from within Bush and McCain's lot, and he rejoined the GOP. This is the very lot, which also joined forces with the radical left, inside the CFR, that are behind the election interference today. They've also done their best to unseat a sitting president. They are the liberal universalists or liberal internationalists; the nation topplers and builders, who spread "international capitalism" in the guise of "democracy." It was GHW Bush that signed the US up for the global warming agenda at Rio in 1992, (Rio+20, Agenda 21), and helped grease the wheels for China to join the WTO, which Clinton continued. Every president, except Trump, was involved in this since Nixon. The real history, leading to today, going back to 1945: Prof. John J. Mearsheimer, Univ. of Chicago, (2019), "Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order": https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/isec_a_00342 Mearsheimer explains what is to come, and it is coming. There is no stopping it. Also, see Pompeo at Brussels: Restoring the Role of the Nation-State in the Liberal International Order: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTr4cO8LXGA
    1
  10328. 1
  10329. 1
  10330. 1
  10331. 1
  10332. 1
  10333. 1
  10334. 1
  10335. 1
  10336. 1
  10337.  Antifederalist  Thank you. It's been a while since I researched this, as it has to do with the royals and nobles claim of being kin to a mermaid, which is based on some fact, along with myth. It goes back to the marriage of King Baldwin II to Morphia of Melitene . She was the daughter of an Armenian nobleman named Gabriel. They had a child, named Melisende, Queen of Jerusalem. There is a story about Cyprus related to this, tied to these families, and I believe that this is where the tale of Avalon originates, via Melisende's son, Amalric I, and his second wife, Isabella I of Jerusalem, which led to Melisende of Lusignan's birth. In other words, Avalon was Cyprus. The original Queen Melisende of Jerusalem, was known for a library, and knowledge, thus, the serpent.. Raymond of Poitiers, in the myth, was the Prince of Antioch from 1136 to 1149, during the time of this history. "Following the death of Prince Bohemund II of Antioch in 1130, the principality came under the regency first of King Baldwin II (1130–31), then King Fulk (1131–35), and finally Princess Alice (1135–36), Bohemond's widow. The reigning princess was Bohemond II's daughter, Constance (born 1127). Against the wishes of Alice, a marriage was arranged for Constance with Raymond, at the time staying in England, which he left only after the death of Henry I on 1 December 1135. "Upon hearing word that Raymond was going to pass through his lands in order to marry the princess of Antioch, King Roger II of Sicily ordered him arrested. By a series of subterfuges, Raymond passed through southern Italy and only arrived at Antioch after 19 April 1136. Patriarch Ralph of Domfront then convinced Alice that Raymond was there to marry her, whereupon she allowed him to enter Antioch (whose loyal garrison had refused him entry) and the patriarch married him to Constance. Alice then left the city, now under the control of Raymond and Ralph." I believe that Melusine of myth is Melisende. Alice of Antioch, was Queen Melisende's sister.
    1
  10338. 1
  10339. 1
  10340. diatonicjon: In the US, it all started over Federal Banking. Everybody was Democratic Republicans at the time. However, the Federalists, (e.g. Hamilton et al), who wanted big government, also wanted a non-regulated National Bank, besides the Wall Street and state banks. These National banks failed, until the last National Bank's charter was stopped by Andrew Jackson in 1832. That was the divide that actually separated the people who became Republicans from the Democrats. Jackson and the Democrats didn't want any banking, especially federal banking, but the industrialized north wanted banking, as it required capital to grow. The south was plantation farming, which used slaves as the workforce, instead of machinery. After the plantations were built, and paid off, they were pretty much self sufficient. In America, slave owners allowed the slaves to reproduce, and they enslaved the children, so they had a replenishable workforce. Outside the US, the British colonies, in the Caribbean, kept buying slaves, when others died off. Anyhow, that started the split, and the flames were fanned by European investors in the National Bank. Within thirty years time, 1832 to 1861, Civil War broke out over it. The British slave laws coincided with stopping the bank. They used slavery as a wedge issue. You will hear people claim that the British banned all slavery then. No, they didn't. They banned it everywhere except for the East India Company in Asia. Before this, they had banned the slave trade, but still used slaves in their colonies. You'll also hear that the Civil War was over slavery. No, it wasn't. Read Lincoln;s inauguration speech. He told the southerners that he would not ban slavery. What started the war, was the southern states secession, before Lincoln was sworn in, and those states confiscating federal property, mainly forts and armories. It was taking back a fort, where the first shot started the whole war. Anyhow, the Brits and the French had the idea to fan the flames of war, and they sent troops to both Canada and Mexico, waiting for us to kill each other off, in order to invade the US, and take it back. It didn't work, as Lincoln took over the printing of our money, and told the Wall Street banks to go jump off a cliff. They had asked as high as around 35% interest to finance the war for Lincoln. They pulled the same thing with the south. They printed their own money too. Ending slavery came later, after the war started. All the banking, then, was state banks, or private. There was no federal bank, one with government involvement. That is why the Democrats like socialism, as it is akin to feudalism and the plantation ideology. That is also why Republicans are capitalists, and are pro-banking, as industry, big business, and free trade can't flourish without it. Industry is based on capital, and when a business needs to expand, or build new plants, banks are required. The differences between Republicans and Federalists, are the need for some banking regulation, and a smaller and leaner federal government. Bigger government means more regulation. WWII, however, ruined the US, with the military industrial complex. It hired so many, that it would collapse the economy if it were stopped. That is why the left and right back it. It is an unavoidable evil, but Trump is well versed on paring down on the cost. The left sees more spending, as hiring more, and the right sees it as being able to afford it. To support the war industry, the US agreed to be Europe's bully on the block. To be in NATO, they have to buy weapons from us.
    1
  10341. diatonicjon: To get an idea of the history about what happened, you'll have to look at the bank's history, British history, and US history, starting as far back as Hamilton and the Federalists. Then, read both the south and north's histories, as they differ in opinion. However, to read about the split, you'll have to study Andrew Jackson, then the Whigs (Patriots), who became the Republicans, banks, tariffs and so on. It's a convoluted mess of one side fighting the other, with the Brits and Europeans fanning the flames, over Jackson's threats, and what he finally did with the National Bank charter. The Whig Party was formed, along with others, and they became the Republican Party under Lincoln. Whig, in the US, was a term they used for the old Patriots. You have to remember, that during that time, there weren't many years separating the Revolution, and Jackson's time in office. Jackson had served during Washington's last term, in the house and senate for Tennessee. The Brits still didn't accept the US as a sovereign nation, and they wanted it back. The left will claim that there was some kind of switch, between the parties in the sixties and seventies, but that isn't true, as I lived through that time. What had happened, was that trade unions began asking for too much in the north, so manufacturing started moving south. Northerners started moving south to find jobs, especially younger workers. That is what shifted the politics of the south, to carry the GOP in place of the Democrats who had held it. Nixon used what he called the southern strategy to get the votes, and it worked. It wasn't about people switching parties, except for the black population. The blacks switched over MLK, JJ, LF, and others telling them to, because of Johnson's welfare package. Before that, the GOP had the majority of the black population's votes, and the GOP was the reason why they even have civil rights laws, as the Democrats voted against them each time, in congress. Malcolm X was involved in it, until he saw what was really happening, and then tried to warn the black population. They murdered him for it. Funny, isn't it, that the GOP was the one who pushed through every civil rights bill, but when the people that those laws were protecting, were offered free money by the Democrats, they left the GOP in droves, only to become slaves on a plantation again. Slaves, dependent on their master, for their housing and welfare. That is how communism also works, the community collective, controlled by government, who owns the property and housing, but also pays them a paltry stipend to the collective. It's all about control, and the same thing as feudalism, or as Reagan wrote to Nixon, a "benevolent monarchy." Johnson used words that are too vulgar to use, when he bragged about what he had done.
    1
  10342. 1
  10343. 1
  10344. 1
  10345.  @georgehetty7857  The internationalists do not care about a nation's politics, since they'll do business with anyone or any nation, because it's solely about making money. Through the years, the internationalists willingly did business with with the Soviets, the Nazis, Imperial Japan, Fascist Italy, and the list goes on. They have no loyalty for any nation or people. Years ago, Carroll Quigley, professor of history at Georgetown University, who taught Clinton and Pelosi, stated that "It is this power structure which the Radical Right in the United States has been attacking for years in the belief that they are attacking the Communists." He also stated: “There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for 20 years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret record.” ― Carroll Quigley “The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence co-operative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.” ― Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time
    1
  10346. 1
  10347. 1
  10348. 1
  10349. 1
  10350. 1
  10351. 1
  10352. 1
  10353. 1
  10354. 1
  10355. 1
  10356. 1
  10357. 1
  10358. 1
  10359. 1
  10360. 1
  10361. 1
  10362. 1
  10363. 1
  10364. 1
  10365. 1
  10366. 1
  10367. 1
  10368. 1
  10369. 1
  10370. 1
  10371. 1
  10372. 1
  10373. 1
  10374. 1
  10375. 1
  10376. 1
  10377. 1
  10378. 1
  10379. 1
  10380. 1
  10381. 1
  10382. 1
  10383. 1
  10384. 1
  10385. 1
  10386. 1
  10387. 1
  10388. buddyjoey: Actually, it does involve Mueller's investigation, as the FBI used the fake Steele dossier to target Carter Page, who had volunteered to work on the GOP campaign. That gave them the inroad to investigate the entire transition team for "Russian collusion," via an order by the DOJ, because Page had worked for US finance interests in Russia, and was known to be sympathetic to the Russians. The FBI used a Yahoo news article, sourced to Steele, to back up Steele's own dossier. They also targeted Papadopolus, a relatively unknown, who was in London. He was targeted over something stated "in a barroom," and that was set forth by Strozk. Papadopolus and Page were not cooperating or working with each other, according to the memo, and Papadopolus, a charlatan, somehow, situated himself inside the campaign, and nobody really knew who he was. The professor that Papadopolus spoke to, claimed that he said none of the such about Russians, and that he supported Hillary Clinton. Steele had also named Trump's attorney, claiming that he had been to Prague, when he had not, and he proved it. Rosenstein allowed Mueller to go where any lead led him, based on info collected in those warrants, in his order. Thus, it wasn't limited to a Russian investigation, as it was open ended. Page led to the others, because of the order. Congress ordered the investigation, based upon the dossier. During their investigation, they found out about Flynn speaking to the Russian ambassador, or any other dignitary, but that was during the transition, after the election, and it was legal for him to do so, as all incoming presidential staff do it. What he did, was to lie to Pence and the FBI about speaking to the ambassador. They also called in Donald Jr., over him speaking with the female Russian attorney, who lied about having info on Hillary Clinton. She tried to hand him documents about "Russian adoptions," which he was smart enough to refuse. Donald Jr, readily admitted to what happened, and he was questioned about it. The Steele dossier led to all of that, as they used Page as the excuse to investigate the entire transition team, due to Rosenstein's order to Mueller. Trump agreed with it, and stated that if the Russian's were involved, then he wanted to know. Last, several people mentioned in the memo are now suing Steele, over what he wrote, for libel, in the British courts. It is also coming out, that Steele may have gotten most of what he wrote from a hatchet man employed by the Clintons, their "plumber," which a few journalists have been talking about, along with Dick Morris, who used to work for the Clintons. This guy had written a similar paper, and he is a very uncredible source. He is who the Clinton's used against the women that Bill messed with, including Lewinski. That is why many attorneys are calling it the fruit of the poisonous tree, as the entire investigation, asked for by congress, and the warrants used to investigate it, was triggered by the Steele dossier. The memo only proved what was already public knowledge, except for pointing out the leakers within the FBI, and verifying their ties to the Clinton campaign and the DNC.
    1
  10389. 1
  10390. 1
  10391. 1
  10392. 1
  10393. 1
  10394. 1
  10395. 1
  10396. 1
  10397. 1
  10398. 1
  10399. 1
  10400. 1
  10401. 1
  10402. 1
  10403. 1
  10404. 1
  10405. 1
  10406. 1
  10407. 1
  10408. 1
  10409. 1
  10410. 1
  10411. 1
  10412. 1
  10413. 1
  10414. 1
  10415. 1
  10416. 1
  10417. 1
  10418. 1
  10419. 1
  10420. 1
  10421. 1
  10422. 1
  10423. 1
  10424. The world history that is being taught within secondary education is nowhere near factual. In fact, it was ultra-wealthy socialists, in both the US and Europe, (who were very adept at crony capitalism), that sent Trotsky and Lenin to Russia, and gave them $1 million to finance the revolution in 1917. Russia was seen as a competitor, so it needed to be destabilized and run by like-minded cronies. It was those same socialists who traveled to Russia and helped write the five-year plans. It was the same socialists who financed and built the huge Soviet factories, while the great depression was taking place everywhere else. It was those same socialists who knew of the Soviets use of slave labor, and they were okay with it. It was those same socialists, that gave the Soviets the technology to build nuclear reactors and the bomb. It was those same socialists, who continued business with the Soviets through the cold war. During this time, Lenin, Stalin, Malenkov, Khrushchev, and Brezhnev wallowed in wealth, (obtained by crony capitalism), while the proletariat was given crumbs, or worse, worked as slaves. If you didn't like it, you were eliminated. These same socialists were spread through the rest of Asia, doing the same thing, including being active in the opium trade. Millions of people died and became slaves over socialism. The same socialists are behind the neo (new) progressive politics, and they are behind globalism and hardline socialism (communism). What really are socialism and communism? Nothing but rebranded feudalism, where the ruling elite practice crony capitalism while enslaving the population.
    1
  10425. 1
  10426. 1
  10427. 1
  10428. 1
  10429. 1
  10430. 1
  10431. 1
  10432. 1
  10433. 1
  10434. 1
  10435. 1
  10436. 1
  10437. 1
  10438. 1
  10439. 1
  10440. 1
  10441. 1
  10442. 1
  10443. 1
  10444. 1
  10445. 1
  10446. 1
  10447. 1
  10448. 1
  10449. 1
  10450. 1
  10451. 1
  10452. 1
  10453. 1
  10454. 1
  10455. 1
  10456. 1
  10457. isaiahbruckhaus: I'm sorry to tell you, but a TOS will not save you from a libel suit. Once any company willingly publishes a malicious lie about another entity/person and the public views it, that is libel. "Libel is a method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, signs, effigies, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business or profession. "Traditionally, libel was a tort governed by state law. State courts generally follow the common law of libel, which allows recovery of damages without proof of actual harm. Under the traditional rules of libel, injury is presumed from the fact of publication. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment's protection of freedom of expression limits a State's ability to award damages in actions for libel." "In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the Court held that proof of actual malice is required for an award of damages in an action for libel involving public officials or matters of public concern. See New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). The Court reasoned that speech related to matters of public concern is at the heart of the protections guaranteed by the First Amendment, and outweighs the State's interest in compensating individuals for damage to their reputations. This "actual malice" test created a national judicial standard for whether speech qualifies as libel." "In Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974), the Court refused to extend the New York Times standard to actions for libel involving private individuals even where the matter is of public concern. In Gertz, the Court recognized a strong and legitimate state interest in compensating private individuals for injury to reputation but cautioned that this interest extends no further than compensation for actual injury. The Gertz Court held that within a case regarding a public concern, recovery of presumed or punitive damages is not permitted without a showing of malice. The only exception to this is when the liability is based on a showing of knowledge of falsity or a reckless disregard for the truth." "In Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (1985), the Supreme Court held that in actions for libel involving private individuals and matters of purely private concern, presumed and punitive damages may be awarded on a lesser showing than actual malice. The Court determined that the First Amendment was not violated by permitting recovery of presumed and punitive damages without a showing of malice, as long as the defamatory statements do not involve issues of public concern."
    1
  10458. 1
  10459. 1
  10460. 1
  10461. 1
  10462. 1
  10463. 1
  10464. 1
  10465. 1
  10466. 1
  10467. 1
  10468. The left hates this country because their feudal plantation lifestyle was extinguished during the Civil War. Jacobin feudalistic ideology, which brought about a tyrannical irreligious government in France, under Robespierre, came here. The Democrats, which the Jacobins became, wanted to rule over the laborers, just as the landed gentry did in Europe. Socialism and Communism are that same ideology, and it has always been the wealthy power elite behind the movement. Marx even stated that the aristocracy was "our betters," and Marx thought himself to be an aristocrat because of who he and his wife's family were. The left has always sought to take control away from the public and place it in the hands of the few at the top. They brag of Jefferson, calling him a great man, but they have never studied US history in depth. Jefferson caused a lot of trouble for the Washington administration, and Jefferson was close to the Jacobins. Under the Adams administration, George Washington wrote to the Sec. of War in 1798 about the XYZ Affair "that you could as soon scrub the blackamoor white, as to change the principles of a professed Democrat; and that he will leave nothing unattempted to overturn the Government of this Country." Jacobin Democrats were within the army. The US was expecting France to attack the US. Washington knew that we had Democrat traitors in the military who would side with France. The Democrats have been against the US since its founding, and that is why the Republicans broke away not long after.
    1
  10469. 1
  10470. 1
  10471. 1
  10472. 1
  10473. 1
  10474. 1
  10475. 1
  10476. 1
  10477. 1
  10478. 1
  10479. 1
  10480. 1
  10481. 1
  10482. 1
  10483. 1
  10484. 1
  10485. 1
  10486. 1
  10487. 1
  10488. 1
  10489. 1
  10490. 1
  10491. 1
  10492. 1
  10493. Blessing John Chelliah: You do realize, that Trump increased sanctions, and ordered that money in US banks is to be seized, and that the people named, can not use the banks,? They are the Russians who were named in the Global Magnitsky Act. He also had the Treasury to issue a list of names, in Russia: "CAATSA Reports, Including on Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation," as a warning to what would come, if Russia continued on its path. Also, those selling military equipment to Russia, agreed to quit, according to deals cut with the State Dept. Even the NYT reported this, although they put a huge left-wing slant to it. The left are overstating the amount that Russia interfered with, or influenced, the election, as it didn't change anyone's minds on the right, who voted for him. As a matter of fact, on the night of the vote, it wasn't the Russians trying to gain access to the state's election servers, but our own government hackers at the NSA, and they were caught in the act. The left and the globalists seem to be wanting a war with Russia, which Trump is trying to avoid. Plus, the left are using that as an excuse to promote the Russian collusion narrative, which didn't happen, as that was invented by Steele and the Democrats, and paid for by the DNC and Hillary. That is the same dossier, which Comey admitted to congress, was pure hogwash. What Flynn did, after the election was over, was legal, as all incoming administrations speak to foreign ambassadors during the transition. What he did wrong, was lying about doing it, to the FBI and Mike Pence. Russia's ambassador wasn't the only foreign dignitary that he spoke to. Obama's team spoke to the same Russians, and other nations, when they was transitioning from Bush. Obama ordered the sanctions at the last minute, along with the unmasking of names, in order to promote the narrative, which was why Flynn told the ambassador to wait until they were in office to look at what was taking place, in order to stop the growing tensions. This will all come out soon. You're believing too much of the MSM, which are in the Democrat's and Globalist's pocket.
    1
  10494. 1
  10495. 1
  10496. 1
  10497. 1
  10498. 1
  10499. 1
  10500. 1
  10501. 1
  10502. 1
  10503. 1
  10504. 1
  10505. 1
  10506. 1
  10507. 1
  10508. 1
  10509. 1
  10510. 1
  10511. 1
  10512. 1
  10513. 1
  10514. 1
  10515. 1
  10516. 1
  10517. 1
  10518. 1
  10519. 1
  10520. 1
  10521. 1
  10522. 1
  10523. 1
  10524. 1
  10525. 1
  10526. 1
  10527. 1
  10528. 1
  10529. 1
  10530. 1
  10531. 1
  10532.  @LeftInBama  Yes, it was within every race, and every culture, going back into antiquity. The press seems awfully blind to it still existing today in several forms, while they only promote a pseudo-history that never existed as they claim. It's always about blaming the white culture. We still have outright slavery in places within several cultures, and labor exploitation in the east, where they're barely paid, and have no worker's rights. Again, it is the amoral internationalist elite that are behind both, and they make fortunes from it. That again reminds me of Robert Owen, who promoted his utopian dream, when, in fact, it was really about exploiting an entire family's labor in a workhouse textile scheme. The children were to be raised and taught (brainwashed) by the commune's teachers from birth. They even had a worker humiliation scheme set up in the mill, for those that didn't produce a set amount. If that kept up, the family was booted from the commune. Many bragged about how "profitable" the system was, especially the investors and owners. It gave Friedrich Engels his ideas about worker exploitation. The Frenchman, Gracchus Babeuf, had a similar hidden motive, when one reads about his ideology. The Mises Institute has a good article about this history, titled: "The Conspiracy of the Equals." Below, I quote one paragraph: "In the ideal communist society sought by the Conspiracy, private property would be abolished, and all property would be communal and stored in communal storehouses. From these storehouses, the goods would be distributed "equitably" by the superiors — apparently, there was to be a cadre of "superiors" in this oh so "equal" world! There was to be universal compulsory labor, "serving the fatherland … by useful labour." Teachers or scientists "must submit certifications of loyalty" to the superiors. The Manifesto acknowledged that there would be an enormous expansion of government officials and bureaucrats in the communist world, inevitable where "the fatherland takes control of an individual from his birth till his death." There would be severe punishments consisting of forced labor against "persons of either sex who set society a bad example by absence of civic-mindedness, by idleness, a luxurious way of life, licentiousness." These punishments, described, as one historian notes "lovingly and in great detail," consisted of deportation to prison islands." Babeuf would have been the head "superior" in his forced labor (enslavement) scheme. It always seems that anything the elite promotes as good, always has an underlying ulterior profit motive behind it for those few at the top, which is detrimental to the public at large.
    1
  10533. 1
  10534. 1
  10535. 1
  10536. 1
  10537. 1
  10538. 1
  10539. 1
  10540. 1
  10541. 1
  10542. 1
  10543. 1
  10544. 1
  10545. 1
  10546. 1
  10547. 1
  10548. 1
  10549. What did Huma state about Hillary to her brother in an e-mail on Sept. 3rd, 2016? This was reported by Superstation95, and they said it was leaked from the NYPD. The e-mail purportedly came after the seized AW laptop. They did their best to shut this up after the report. >> ON SEPTEMBER 03, 2016 AT 8:57 PM. HUMA ABEDIN @YAHOO.COM WROTE: >> SORRY FOR MY LATE REPLY, HASSAN. YES, LET ME >> TELL YOU ABOUT HER. THE WOMAN IS SO ODD, SO STARVED FOR >> VALIDATION, SO TORMENTED AND VAIN IT IS A CONSTANT >> SURPRISE TO ME THAT ANYONE TAKES HER SERIOUSLY. >> EVERYONE ON THE TEAM KNOWS HOW UNWELL SHE IS, BUT >> THEY’RE MORE DETERMINED THAN EVER TO SEE HER WIN. THIS >> WOMAN THAT HAS A DOZEN SEIZURES A DAY. THIS GODLESS >> SHRIEKING MALCONTENT PASSED OUT IN HER MEDICAL VAN. >> THIS WALKING CADAVER. SHE’S NONFUNCTIONAL. HASSAN, >> NOBODY CARES. WE SOBER HER UP FOR SPEECHES AND >> INDULGE THE PRESS CORPS WITH CHEAP SENTIMENT. THE FIRST >> FEMALE PRESIDENT. THE LAST GLASS CEILING, ETC. THEY TRIP >> OVER THEMSELVES LINING UP BEHIND HER. SURELY THEY KNOW >> IT IS NOT HER THEY’RE GETTING. IT’S THE ONE IN THE CORNER, >> THE QUIET HELPER, YOUR SISTER HUMA. YOU ASKED ME ONCE >> HOW I DID IT. HOW DID I TAKE THE CASTLE? HASSAN, I DIDN’T >> TAKE IT, THEY GAVE IT TO ME. YES, THERE WAS A COST. I WILL >> ADMIT, SUBJECTING MYSELF TO AW AND WJC >> IS MORTAL TORTURE. BUT I DO IT >> GLADLY, BROTHER, EVERYTHING THEY ASK OF ME, HOWEVER >> SICK AND DEPRAVED. I DO IT, AND I SMILE, REJOICING AT THE >> THOUGHT OF WHOSE GLORY I SERVE.
    1
  10550. 1
  10551. 1
  10552. 1
  10553. 1
  10554. 1
  10555. 1
  10556. 1
  10557. 1
  10558. 1
  10559. 1
  10560. 1
  10561. 1
  10562. 1
  10563. 1
  10564. 1
  10565. 1
  10566. 1
  10567. Mao's millennialist "progressive" socialist cult is similar to those that have risen and fell several times in history. These apocalyptic cults appear during or after unrest, great wars, famine, or at the coming of a new millennium. Mao became his follower's messiah, and each time, in history, they always lead to a tyrannical despot that hides behind a religious cult and prophesy, which is either hidden or public. In China, one example was Hong Xiuquan (b. 1814), using the ideology of the White Lotus groups, he brought about the Taiping Revolution / Rebellion. Hong claimed to be the brother of Christ. "For over a decade, the Taiping occupied and fought across much of the mid and lower Yangtze valley. Ultimately devolving into total war, the conflict between the Taiping and the Qing was the largest in China since the Qing conquest in 1644 and it involved every province of China proper except Gansu. It ranks as one of the bloodiest wars in human history, the bloodiest civil war, and the largest conflict of the 19th century. Estimates of the war dead range from 10–30 million. 30 million people fled the conquered regions to foreign settlements or other parts of China." Massive death always follows these millennialist cults. "Millennialism, or chiliasm, is a belief advanced by some religious denominations that a Golden Age or Paradise will occur on Earth prior to the final judgment and future eternal state of the 'World to Come.'" Marx and others were always seeking their golden age.
    1
  10568. 1
  10569. 1
  10570. 1
  10571. 1
  10572. 1
  10573. 1
  10574. 1
  10575. 1
  10576. 1
  10577. 1
  10578. 1
  10579. 1
  10580. 1
  10581. 1
  10582. 1
  10583. 1
  10584. 1
  10585. 1
  10586. 1
  10587. 1
  10588. 1
  10589. 1
  10590. 1
  10591. 1
  10592. 1
  10593. 1
  10594. 1
  10595. 1
  10596.  @PWRR  Oh, how well I know. We're still in a battle between what's left of Jeffersonian Republicanism, which equates to freedom, and Hamiltonian Federalism, which equates to big brother government. I've always wondered where the leftists, in both parties, came up with "orange man." Orange was the color selected by the "Old Republicans" led by Rep. John Randolph of Roanoke, who split with Jefferson and Madison after they started to side more with the Federalists. Jackson was who Randolph supported, and he was the same president that 45 did as well. Randolph described Old Republican values as: “love of peace, hatred of offensive war, jealousy of the state governments toward the general government, a dread of standing armies, a loathing of public debts, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy of the patronage of the President.” I might not agree with everything Randolph believed, such as elitism, but the words in that quotation, I do believe in. Of course, many that came from Britain (Virginias' First Families) were elitists during that time. There's a good book on this, titled: The Roots of American Communism, by Draper. It explains what occurred, going back to the many German emigrants that flooded in during the 1800s. There are many others as well, which tell of Leon Trotsky, the Christian Socialists, their collegiate ties, the Rand School of Social Science, and how the infection began. The history of the "bad bishop" William Montgomery Brown is very telling.
    1
  10597. 1
  10598. 1
  10599. 1
  10600. 1
  10601. 1
  10602. 1
  10603. 1
  10604. 1
  10605. 1
  10606. 1
  10607. 1
  10608. 1
  10609. 1
  10610. 1
  10611. 1
  10612. 1
  10613. 1
  10614. 1
  10615. 1
  10616. 1
  10617. 1
  10618. 1
  10619. 1
  10620. 1
  10621. 1
  10622. 1
  10623. 1
  10624. 1
  10625. 1
  10626. 1
  10627. 1
  10628. 1
  10629. 1
  10630. 1
  10631. 1
  10632. Kathleen: I also quote Dan Smoot's book, "The Invisible Government," (1965): Quote. In September, 1916, Wilson (at the urging of House) appointed a committee of intellectuals (the first President's Brain Trust) to formulate peace terms and draw up a charter for world government. This committee, with House in charge, consisted of about 150 college professors, graduate students, lawyers, economists, writers, and others. Among them were men still familiar to Americans in the 1960's: Walter Lippmann (columnist); Norman Thomas (head of the American socialist party); Allen Dulles (former head of C.I.A.); John Foster Dulles (late Secretary of State); Christian A. Herter (former Secretary of State). These eager young intellectuals around Wilson, under the clear eyes of crafty Colonel House, drew up their charter for world government (League of Nations Covenant) and prepared for the brave new socialist one-world to follow World War I. But things went sour at the Paris Peace Conference. They soured even more when constitutionalists in the United States Senate found out what was being planned and made it quite plain that the Senate would not authorize United States membership in such a world federation. Bitter with disappointment but not willing to give up, Colonel House called together in Paris, France, a group of his most dedicated young intellectuals–among them, John Foster and Allen Dulles, Christian A. Herter, and Tasker H. Bliss–and arranged a dinner meeting with a group of like-minded Englishmen at the Majestic Hotel, Paris, on May 19, 1919. The group formally agreed to form an organization "for the study of international affairs." The American group came home from Paris and formed The Council on Foreign Relations, which was incorporated in 1921. The purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations was to create (and condition the American people to accept) what House called a "positive" foreign policy for America–to replace the traditional "negative" foreign policy which had kept America out of the endless turmoil of old-world politics and had permitted the American people to develop their great nation in freedom and independence from the rest of the world. The Council did not amount to a great deal until 1927, when the Rockefeller family (through the various Rockefeller Foundations and Funds) began to pour money into it. Before long, the Carnegie Foundations (and later the Ford Foundation) began to finance the Council. In 1929, the Council (largely with Rockefeller gifts) acquired its present headquarters property: The Harold Pratt House, 58 East 68th Street, New York City. In 1939, the Council began taking over the U.S. State Department. Shortly after the start of World War II, in September, 1939, Hamilton Fish Armstrong and Walter H. Mallory, of the Council on Foreign Relations, visited the State Department to offer the services of the Council. It was agreed that the Council would do research and make recommendations for the State Department, without formal assignment or responsibility. The Council formed groups to work in four general fields–Security and Armaments Problems, Economic and Financial Problems, Political Problems, and Territorial Problems. The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to finance, through grants, the operation of this plan. In February, 1941, the Council on Foreign Relations' relationship with the State Department changed. The State Department created the Division of Special Research, which was divided into Economic, Security, Political, Territorial sections. Leo Pasvolsky, of the Council, was appointed Director of this Division. Within a very short time, members of the Council on Foreign Relations dominated this new Division in the State Department. During 1942, the State Department set up the Advisory Committee on Postwar Foreign Policy. Secretary of State Cordell Hull was Chairman. The following members of the Council on Foreign Relations were on this Committee: Under Secretary of State Sumner Welles (Vice-Chairman), Dr. Leo Pasvolsky (Executive Officer); Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Isaiah Bowman, Benjamin V. Cohen, Norman H. Davis, and James T. Shotwell. Other members of the Council also found positions in the State Department: Philip E. Mosely, Walter E. Sharp, and Grayson Kirk, among others. The crowning moment of achievement for the Council came at San Francisco in 1945, when over 40 members of the United States Delegation to the organizational meeting of the United Nations (where the United Nations Charter was written) were members of the Council. Among them: Alger Hiss, Secretary of State Edward R. Stettinius, Leo Pasvolsky, John Foster Dulles, John J. McCloy, Julius C. Holmes, Nelson A. Rockefeller, Adlai Stevenson, Joseph E. Johnson, Ralph J. Bunche, Clark M. Eichelberger, and Thomas K. Finletter. By 1945, the Council on Foreign Relations, and various foundations and other organizations interlocked with it, had virtually taken over the U.S. State Department. Some CFR members were later identified as Soviet espionage agents: for example, Alger Hiss and Lauchlin Currie. Other Council on Foreign Relations members–Owen Lattimore, for example–with powerful influence in the Roosevelt and Truman Administrations, were subsequently identified, not as actual communists or Soviet espionage agents, but as "conscious, articulate instruments of the Soviet international conspiracy." End Quote. Smoot was an ex-FBI agent who was close to H L Hunt, one of the wealthiest oil men alive at the time. Smoot witnessed much of this when he was in the military and the FBI.
    1
  10633. 1
  10634. 1
  10635. 1
  10636. 1
  10637. 1
  10638. 1
  10639. 1
  10640. 1
  10641. 1
  10642. 1
  10643. 1
  10644. 1
  10645. 1
  10646. 1
  10647. 1
  10648. 1
  10649. 1
  10650. 1
  10651. 1
  10652. 1
  10653. 1
  10654. 1
  10655. 1
  10656. 1
  10657. 1
  10658. 1
  10659. 1
  10660. 1
  10661. 1
  10662. 1
  10663. 1
  10664. ​ Ario  Go back much father, to the area around Samara, which is where language supposedly originates, with the Yamnaya ancestor's, the Samara culture, etc, and earlier. That is, supposedly, the root of all language, and the origins of the culture that came south. . When speaking of the Kurgans, that is a wide and general term that leads back to the ancients, such as the Samara and earlier. One would be better off to call it the Steppe theory, which doesn't call out a specific group. . The hypothesis is about tracing these very ancient cultures back to the beginning of language, and the societies that sprang from it. The mound builders, I believe, are much older than the ziggurat and pyramid builders, where the later constructions were recreations or representations of the mounds and mountains of the people of the Steppes, (from the Urals and Caucasus), which were the mountain ranges of the nomadic cattle herders. . Even though the Fertile Crescent was advanced as it was, the people from the north are credited with first using the horse, and inventing the wheel and chariots. The cultures of the Fertile Crescent feared them, and they were called "God's whip," in the Levant. . The ancient cultures in the Fertile Crescent would have never appeared, without the language and culture that they received from the north. Oddly enough, the four "civilizations," supposedly appeared at about the same time, in the Fertile Crescent, the Indus Valley, China, and in Peru. . Anyhow, stating this, a language and culture was needed to develop writing, and mathematics, etc, to build up and create the first four civilizations. The claim is, that after language and culture came into Mesopotamia, around the Ubaid period, the civilization, which sprang from it, spread back north to the original source of the language. However, Göbekli Tepe shows otherwise, and it is in the path of the southward migration of those coming into the Fertile Crescent from the north, and is much older.
    1
  10665. 1
  10666. 1
  10667. 1
  10668. 1
  10669. 1
  10670. 1
  10671. 1
  10672. 1
  10673. 1
  10674. 1
  10675. 1
  10676. 1
  10677. 1
  10678. 1
  10679. 1
  10680. 1
  10681. 1
  10682. 1
  10683. 1
  10684. 1
  10685. 1
  10686. 1
  10687. 1
  10688. 1
  10689. 1
  10690. 1
  10691. 1
  10692. 1
  10693. 1
  10694. I became a conservative, due to college, but it was before the left had turned our universities into indoctrination centers for cultural Marxism, (though it had started), since I matriculated in the early 1980s. What did it for me, you ask? I noticed what was happening, I learned of the Weathermen, the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society, which happens to be a Communist front group), and the Frankfurt School. You see, those who came here from the Frankfurt School, taught those who belonged to the Weathermen, (Communist terrorists, who escaped prosecution by the DOJ, due to a leftist administration). Next, the Weathermen, such as Bill Ayers and his wife, are who became the professors who taught today's professors and teachers. Believe it or not, there was a left-wing FBI agent behind helping the Weathermen escape prosecution, Mark Felt (Deep Throat), who also set Nixon up. I hope you can see where this is going, as I will stop it there. I quote Dr. Mary Grabar, Ph.D., English, from the University of Georgia in 2002: "Bill Ayers likens a traditional school to prison because it requires students adhere to dress codes, schedules, and rules of discipline. But he has had captive audiences and has used his power as a professor to indoctrinate future teachers. His education philosophy is based on anarchism, progressivism, and Marxism. It’s all about radicalizing children in social justice lessons, and making them see themselves as victims of an evil capitalistic system." "I want to show that although Ayers was a failed bomber, he was successful in helping to transform and destroy education. And he did it at taxpayers’ expense. He has trained hundreds of teachers. He worked closely with Obama and [U.S. Secretary of Education] Arne Duncan in Chicago in funding programs aimed at radicalizing students. One of his closest colleagues, Linda Darling-Hammond, was on Obama’s education transition team, and was in charge of developing one of the two Common Core tests. And Bill Ayers has appeared at conferences with Duncan and other officials in organizations that devised Common Core." "What Bill Ayers would have in the classroom extends the 1960s agenda of smashing monogamy, ending the bourgeois family and its values, destroying the work ethic, [and] patriotism. So what we have is kids indoctrinated with lessons about the police—the 1960s narrative about the “pigs”—fatherless, rootless, joining gangs, and looting in the streets. It’s a Marxist’s dream come true. Those like Bill Ayers don’t have to do the dangerous work of setting bombs any more. They can watch the Crips and the Bloods unite against the police, as we’ve been seeing on the streets of Baltimore. They can watch from the comfort of their homes in nice gentrified neighborhoods, as they collect retirement checks and honoraria for speaking gigs."
    1
  10695. 1
  10696. 1
  10697. 1
  10698. 1
  10699. 1
  10700. 1
  10701. 1
  10702. 1
  10703. 1
  10704. 1
  10705. 1
  10706. 1
  10707. 1
  10708. 1
  10709. 1
  10710. 1
  10711. 1
  10712. 1
  10713. 1
  10714. 1
  10715. 1
  10716. 1
  10717. 1
  10718. 1
  10719. 1
  10720. 1
  10721. 1
  10722. 1
  10723. 1
  10724. 1
  10725. 1
  10726. 1
  10727. 1
  10728. 1
  10729. 1
  10730. 1
  10731. 1
  10732. 1
  10733. 1
  10734. 1
  10735. 1
  10736. 1
  10737. 1
  10738. 1
  10739. 1
  10740. 1
  10741. 1
  10742. 1
  10743. 1
  10744. 1
  10745. 1
  10746. 1
  10747. 1
  10748. 1
  10749. 1
  10750. 1
  10751. 1
  10752. 1
  10753. 1
  10754. 1
  10755. 1
  10756. 1
  10757. 1
  10758. 1
  10759. 1
  10760. 1
  10761. 1
  10762. 1
  10763. 1
  10764. 1
  10765. 1
  10766. 1
  10767. 1
  10768. 1
  10769. 1
  10770. 1
  10771. 1
  10772. 1
  10773. 1
  10774. 1
  10775. That is the big difference between the two parties. The DNC selects who they want, regardless of the primary vote, while the Rs follow the vote. The first is "undemocratic," and the second is democratic. The Ds, going back to Boss Tweed, have been guilty of this for a very long time. Saying this, the D Party, especially after 1945, had to do this to keep out the radicals that have been with them since the Democrat Clubs, (consisting of the French and Germans), which formed under Washington. The Ds, though, have been socialists from day one. It's one of the reasons why the Rs left the D-R Party by 1829, and it's the biggest one. Jefferson's political ideology never did fully mesh with that of Madison and Monroe, as the latter two were close with the French radicals. . What I have been told of the R Party, is that they control the top membership, to keep out the radicals, before they can throw their hat in the ring. NGOs, such as the Hudson Institute, which recommends R policy, comes into play here. The institute's roots go back to Ike and "two agencies," but they also supported three "progressive" candidates (Nixon, and both Bushes), which has led us down a dark globalist road with wars and China. However, the R Party still adheres to the primary vote. . Trump, who, at one time, called himself a D, also became a reformer, and ran in 1999-2000 under Perot's Reform Party, which he quickly left, and outed. He ran as a reformer, again, but this time as an R, and he has kept his word. He left the D Party over the same reason as Reagan.
    1
  10776. 1
  10777. 1
  10778. 1
  10779. 1
  10780. 1
  10781. Yes, the "we wuz kangs" group. The fact is, Jesus was a learned Jewish rabbi, and that has been documented in early Jewish writing, as well as the Roman church agreeing with that. He was also of the Pharisees, which is mainstream Judaism, and was from the north, at Galilee, where the Zealots lived (who would knife you if you broke their law). That is what started his rebellion, the Zealots versus the Romans. ' The man called Jesus, today, was open minded, and brought back baptism, which goes back to washing one's hands before entering a temple. He supposedly discussed the more ancient esoteric beliefs, (Dead Sea Scrolls), which the Romans tried to destroy. The Jews even agree that baptism or washing/bathing was an old belief of theirs. . That being said, I have always been of the belief that the Jews are the people from Mesopotamia, and that they came from Babylon (there was no eighty years, or history before that), or around it. If so, they were most likely light skinned, because the ruling elite and priestly class from the north were. The statues and idols show the ruling elite as light skinned, black haired, and blue eyed from that area, (the dark-haired people). . Let's not forget the light skinned ruling elite in Egypt, shown on their own tombs, and in their temples. They also painted themselves with a reddish brown ocre type of body paint, and why this was done, nobody really knows. We also know that other elite in Egypt were Caucasian, with red hair in some instances, because their graves were explored. . Go back to the Kurgan hypothesis, which DNA supports, and it explains why. R1a and R1b. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurgan_hypothesis . That being said, if one reads the old literature on this, there were mixed races as far north as Russia and Ukraine, along the steppe and to the forks of the Volga, with the Eurasian nomads being akin to the American Indian, and described as dark. It was according to the tribe.
    1
  10782. 1
  10783. 1
  10784. 1
  10785. 1
  10786. 1
  10787. 1
  10788. 1
  10789. 1
  10790. 1
  10791. 1
  10792. 1
  10793. 1
  10794. 1
  10795. 1
  10796. 1
  10797. 1
  10798. 1
  10799. 1
  10800. 1
  10801. 1
  10802. 1
  10803. 1
  10804. 1
  10805. 1
  10806. 1
  10807. 1
  10808. 1
  10809. 1
  10810. 1
  10811. 1
  10812. 1
  10813. 1
  10814. 1
  10815. 1
  10816. 1
  10817. 1
  10818. 1
  10819. 1
  10820. 1
  10821. 1
  10822. 1
  10823. 1
  10824. 1
  10825. 1
  10826. 1
  10827. 1
  10828. 1
  10829. 1
  10830. 1
  10831. 1
  10832. 1
  10833. 1
  10834. 1
  10835. 1
  10836. 1
  10837. 1
  10838. 1
  10839. 1
  10840. 1
  10841. 1
  10842. 1
  10843. 1
  10844. 1
  10845. 1
  10846. 1
  10847. New York Declaration (forms Global Compact): 33. "Reaffirming that all individuals who have crossed or are seeking to cross international borders are entitled to due process in the assessment of their legal status, entry and stay, we will consider reviewing policies that criminalize crossborder movements. We will also pursue alternatives to detention while these assessments are under way." https://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/71/1 That "we will consider reviewing policies that criminalize crossborder movements" is what doesn't sit right with the majority in the US, even legal Hispanics. It almost sounds like the UN wishes to supersede or control US immigration law, (as well as other nations), and that they wish for open borders. This is exactly what the activists have been pushing. Considering what nations seem to have taken control of the UN, from within, which forced the US to withdraw from several UN organizations, one thinks of destabilization efforts. It is documented that a handful of "civil society" foundations sent people to Central America, rounded up large groups of people, placed them on buses, and bused them through Mexico to the border. It took threats of economic sanctions against Mexico to stop it, as they had turned a blind eye to it. Worse, the foundations were working with traffickers in Central America to do it. One of the very same foundations has been footing the bill for the ships bringing immigrants to Italy. Worse, they received funding (taxpayers dollars) from USAID. On top of that, we have Turkey using immigrants as a blackmail tool against the west. Turkey is awful close to Russia and China today.
    1
  10848. 1
  10849. 1
  10850. 1
  10851. 1
  10852. 1
  10853. 1
  10854. 1
  10855. 1
  10856. 1
  10857. 1
  10858. 1
  10859. 1
  10860. 1
  10861. 1
  10862. 1
  10863. 1
  10864. 1
  10865. 1
  10866. 1
  10867. 1
  10868. 1
  10869. 1
  10870. 1
  10871. 1
  10872. 1
  10873. 1
  10874. 1
  10875. 1
  10876. 1
  10877. 1
  10878. 1
  10879. 1
  10880. 1
  10881. 1
  10882. 1
  10883. 1
  10884. 1
  10885. 1
  10886. 1
  10887. 1
  10888. 1
  10889. 1
  10890. 1
  10891. 1
  10892. 1
  10893. 1
  10894. 1
  10895. 1
  10896. 1
  10897. 1
  10898. 1
  10899. 1
  10900. 1
  10901. 1
  10902. 1
  10903. 1
  10904. 1
  10905. 1
  10906. 1
  10907. 1
  10908. 1
  10909. 1
  10910. 1
  10911. 1
  10912. 1
  10913. 1
  10914. 1
  10915. 1
  10916. 1
  10917. 1
  10918. 1
  10919. This is what has always been hidden, well, at least during Queen Victoria's reign until the sixties, with the wealthy power elite in the US and UK. The Anglo-American Establishment, which is made up of libertines, made good use of this blackmail racket, with the famous Stephen Ward case exposing it in the sixties. It's also tied to money laundering and offshore banking. JE and GM were just a newer iteration of that. I'll bet that someone has already replaced them. DC is debauchery on steroids, just like NYC and London are, and they're all linked. LBJ's Bobby Baker run the ring in DC at one time. "Baker frequently mixed politics with personal business. He was one of the initiators and the treasurer of the Quorum Club, located in the Carroll Arms Hotel adjacent to a Senate office building. The society was a place for lawmakers and other influential men to meet for food, drink, and ladies, away from the press that were constantly downstairs in the hotel lobby. Baker contends that, 'The Quorum Club, of all the things I was involved in, it is the most insignificant thing. It was located in the Carroll Arms Hotel. When they first put it together, they asked me to get attorney Ernie Tucker to draw up the papers, which he did. The Quorum Club was a place where a guy wanted to get away, you know, from being at the bar downstairs at the Carroll Arms, where there were too many reporters or too many gawkers. It was an easy place for a lobbyist to get together with a Senator, or a Senator's girlfriend. ... I was very close to all the administrative assistants and legislative assistants. I would say 90% were like me. [We] All had girlfriends. And the Quorum Club was a place that you could be met there and nobody would know about it.'"
    1
  10920. 1
  10921. 1
  10922. 1
  10923. 1
  10924. 1
  10925. 1
  10926. 1
  10927. 1
  10928. 1
  10929. 1
  10930. 1
  10931. 1
  10932. 1
  10933. 1
  10934. 1
  10935. The people that had his documentary banned, are the same insane and wealthy power elite, which like to travel around the world, staying in private island villas at five-star spa resorts, around the Caribbean, Seychelles, Maldives, or French Polynesia. They brag these places up as being environmentally friendly, which cost $950+ a night, even though they put them on a small island on an coral atoll, which once had no humans on them. Thus, they disrupted nature instead of helping it. If they're wealthy enough, they buy their own island. You should hear what some of them have said about the natives, and about where they live ("not very photogenic," etc), especially on the isles that are residential, which have the airports. It was nothing good, yet the islanders are the very people that give them their five star treatment. Imagine the spa workers meeting Madonna, Clinton, or Epstein. Didn't you ever wonder what Epstein had planned for the two islands he purchased? These are the power elite's retreats and spas. It's where they run so they don't have to associate with the working class. The Buffetts and Gates of the world, flock to them to hobnob with the politicos. "What happens on the island, stays on the island." Some of the most notorious resorts, though, are in places like Thailand. Imagine walking in the lobby, and the first thing you see are young teens running about, who work there. Remember the massage tables? Stephen Ward and Jeffery Epstein. How much carbon fuel does their planes and yachts burn, to travel to these places?
    1
  10936. 1
  10937. 1
  10938. 1
  10939. 1
  10940. 1
  10941. 1
  10942. 1
  10943. 1
  10944. 1
  10945. 1
  10946. 1
  10947. 1
  10948. 1
  10949. 1
  10950. 1
  10951. 1
  10952. 1
  10953. 1
  10954. 1
  10955. 1
  10956. 1
  10957. 1
  10958. 1
  10959. 1
  10960. 1
  10961. 1
  10962. 1
  10963. 1
  10964. 1
  10965. 1
  10966. 1
  10967. 1
  10968. 1
  10969. 1
  10970. 1
  10971. 1
  10972. 1
  10973. 1
  10974. 1
  10975. 1
  10976. 1
  10977. 1
  10978. 1
  10979. 1
  10980. 1
  10981. 1
  10982. 1
  10983. 1
  10984. 1
  10985. 1
  10986. 1
  10987. 1
  10988. 1
  10989. 1
  10990. 1
  10991. 1
  10992. 1