Comments by "Wei" (@wile123456) on "TLDR News EU"
channel.
-
350
-
260
-
135
-
123
-
107
-
71
-
67
-
56
-
50
-
49
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
Some notes:
1 the red bloc includes the green party, Alternativet, why not have them in the graphic lol?
2 Great coverage of the mink scandal, you covered it better than most danes short term memory
3 the mink industry is beginning to reopen
4 They aren't called the social liberals, they are called radikale venstre. (radical left) stop misappropiating our names into english versions that no one uses
5 the reason the blue bloc lost is because of infighting. You mentioned lars løkke a former Venstre leader, but also inger støjbjerg who was a big name in venstre before she was sentenced with 2 months of prison/house arrest after abusing her minister powers to illegally seperate immigrant couples and later kicked out of parlament, she, like Lars løkke, formed her own populist party, appealing to rural areas and stealing votes from venstre. Moderaterne also took many votes from venstre. So they went backwards almost 50%. That combined with the conservative party running for stateminister challenging venstre weakened the blue blocs chances. The conservative leader, søren pape, also made racist comments about greenland, refusing to apologize and when he finally did apologize it was a weak half assed apology, done in a TV debate, used rethorically to make Mette Frederiksen apologies for the mink scandal. His party looked to become huge in the polls, instead he lost 2 seats.
The future is unsure, wether it will be a broad government or a left wing one. Most parties want multiple parties in government this time, compared to last election.
(also yes, racism is normalized in our country's politics, so if you wonder why so many scandals are about it, then its par the course for Denmark.)
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
@johntom5049 - Well thank you for complimenting my language4. No worries, I appreciate that you're more good faith than I assumed byt apoligizing here.
"not thinking it would can only come from someone who's not familiar with the field, anyone who has studied economics would know it to be true, it's a know common fact. Also it's simple mathematical logic,"
More posturing, your only arguement here is the mathmatical one. If you want workers to work more hours, pay them to work more hours or structure their work week differently. No one should be required to work in their sparetime, and no work should go unpaid.
Slavery is also more productive and earns more money, but we don't practice it because it's morally wrong and inhumane. Similarly, disrupting people's lives by not allowing them to be off work when they aren't working is also bad. The economic aspect is very minor in my opinion compared to the human aspect.
Most econemies became better ones unions arose and workers gained more rights. After the industrialization, producitivty might have been higher because people worked 12 hours a day and children worked in factories, but all that wealth only went to the mega rich. Worker rights also came with redistributing wealth and it's why we in europe, and especially my country of Denmark, have such good public services.
good physical and metnal healtha re important for a productive workforce in any country. The right to go offline is important for mental health. It can also be related ot the studies in 4 day work weeks, that show people have a net increase in productivity when they aren't overworked, crunch leads very often to worse outcomes and poorer performance.
You can talk about math as much as you want, but you can enever erase the psychological or sociological factors in how humans operate. We aren't machines. More working hours doesn't always give the same increase in productivity.
Portugal is doing well compared to it's past self. It is a country witha different history and predispositions than asutralia so it can't be compared one to one. But it is moving in the right direction and has implemented many smart policy changes.
Denmark used to be a back alley farm land with no economy to speak of, now we are one of the strongest econmies in europe relatively to our size, only because of the important work socialists have done in the past century and beyond. Portugal might be on a similar path if it keeps implmenting smart policies.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vitoanania6042 Allowing asylum seekers to become a part of society leads to less crime and more tax incomes.
It is a crazy fascist thing, because your idea of control, leads to human smuggling and people staying off the grid, working illegally and not paying taxes to survive. because racists like you want to send them back to war and death
The nordics approach didn't fail, racist political parties just got more votes over time as people living in the country side who never met immigrants in their life started to get more and more scared due to them being racist and afraid of other cultures. the media kept blowing up problems with immigration despite 98% of immigrants working normal jobs or studying and being normal citizens. They kept focusing on niche crimes, even as crime has been declining over the past decades. And if you want to reduce crime further, number one factor is reducing poverty.
Our previous policy worked better, but we stopped because a big percentage of the population is too irrational and emotional, ignoring facts and focusing on the same myths as fascist regimes did in the past. Nazi Germany used the same exact arugements against jews as you're using now. It's why we call you fascistic, and Italy's president is litterally a fascist, as her brothers of italy party is the direct descendent of mussolini's fascist party.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Because like 100 years ago, fascism is on the rise. The economic insecurity leads racist populist to soar in popularity, as the age old "it's immigrants fault" never fails to sell, despite the systemic problems of society and economy being far more complex than that. Like the 1920's, these parties will erode democracy, and in some places, completely destroy it (like Orban in Hungary is close to doing) on the milder end, they'll just make it impossible for minorities to vote, something "centrist" parties support them in doing
1 remove voting rights for non-native population (most of Europe already has this in full effect, with almost impossible to gain citizenship)
2 remove trans rights and make them miserable and slowly cull them from the population
3 remove family rights from homlsexuals
4 remove abortion rights and push men and women into outdated and traditional gender norms. The women won't vote anymore if all the welfare and kindergarten are closed, and the women are forced to take care of the kids 24/7
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Censored_Truth_Addict Yes, racism in Danish politics, especially against people from greenland, is very normalized. The fact Søren Pape defended his racist remarks and never did a proper apology, and when he attempted one, he used it as a stunt on national TV against Mette Frederiksen shows that while taboo, its not really punished enough. No person in this country should be able to hold the racist opinions he holds if racism wasn't normalized to some extent.
Likewise all the hate against muslims in the country, and the fact we break UN human rights law, by discriminating against people of colour in certain neighbourhoods. We also try to copy the english Illegal Rwanda deportation policy, and the socdems and everyone right of them fully endorses it. So when over 50% of the electorate votes for and supports such blantant racism and human rights violations, then racism is quite normalized here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sheriffcupcake6054 That's not how any of this works lmao
Those politicians are utterly braindead, but I'd love to see them sign out of the UN and walk back the countless human rights treaties your country has ratified lmao.
And no, you litterally don't know anything about asylum. Cases can be rejected, but the law states that everyone has a right to a fair asylum trail to have their circumstance looked at. Likewise they'd naturally spread out if everyone didn't break international law, because there would be good chances in most european nations, but right now they congegrate on the border because there is a lack of working together to distribute the people and workforce properly, again, because of racism. Not a majority, but a large sum, of european politcians nationally and in the EU parlament simply just hate muslims. They each ahve their copium reasons of why, but they view them as lesser human beings, and it's what leads to all these problems.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1