Comments by "Wei" (@wile123456) on "Voices of the Past" channel.

  1.  Carmicha3l  it's Russian eastern vikings, they are different from western Danish and norwigian vikings, who were often said to be very clean
    14
  2. Most US socialists these days are libertarian socialists, tankies who simp for Stalin are a minority
    10
  3.  @TheTeodorsoldierabvb  this video is the Rus, or eastern vikings traveling the rivers of Russia. They were very different from the Danish and norwigian vikings. For example the western vikings buried their chiefs under big hills, where the Eastern burnt them. Accounts from England say the western vikings were much more clean than the English, but then again the English could also have horrible hygiëne in comparison. The Arabs were the most clean, having a long culture of washing themselves often, even to this day. So as an Arab traveler he would probably find them all dirty in comparison
    10
  4.  @andrejparunovic  Too many people wrongly think every socialist is a Stalinist
    6
  5.  @shangtsung1362  HAHAHAHA how are leftist stealing the election when Biden isn't even a leftist? You're a delusional trump supporter believing in conspiracy theories, grow up
    2
  6.  @shangtsung1362  The court cases are public, trumps legal team has lost almost all, currently they are 1-50 or so. There isn't thousands of witnesses, most affedavits (a testimony saying you'll witness in court) they have, has backed out because they can't lie under oath in the courtroom, but the legal team lies and spreads conspiracies in press briefings because that isn't illegal. An affidavit is not the same as a witness or evidence, because everyone can make an affidavit and lie or make unsubstantiated claims. The trump lawyers are abseloutly incompetent (the fact they disowned Sydney Powel, one of the main members of the team, should tell you enough about their incompetence), listen to the recordings, when asked if there is evidence of fraud, they say no, because you have to provide substantial amount of evidence that a these few mistakes or anecdotes they show, are somehow a symptom of a large conspiracy, something that's completly baseless which is why the judges dismiss most of their cases. Trump appointed judges many of them, don't say dumb stuff that the judges are in a conspiracy too or only democrat. Across multiple states it's the same patterns of abseloute failure and lies, it's the weakest coup attempt in all of human histyory what the trump campaign is attempting to do (atleast other fascist are more competent). American democracy is working as it always has, and where voter disenfrancisement exists, most laws are because of republicans wanting to suppress minority votes. But that is attempts to make it harder to vote (make mail in difficult etc) not actually throwing votes out. (for example, florida updated their laws after the election where Bush Jr. became president, because it came down to a few hundred votes and it took forever to count and recount because they were not allowed to precount mail in votes. Now they are, hence it only took a few hours after election night to tally all the votes. Meanwhile pensylvania took forever because they have outdated laws that say they aren't allowed to count votes until election night. These laws have existed forever and isn't something Biden or anyone has made just for this election or have used for a conspiracy.) So it's factually and objectivly incorrect that there is any large scale fraud, but even in the case that there is, what would it change? Trump needs millions of votes, needs multiple states to turn over to his majority, that's so extreme. If it was 500 votes tipping the scale, sure maybe you could fraud with that, but no, Trump is extremly unpopular and lost the popular vote by a huge margin. The American public hates him and wants him gone. I recommend LegalEagle's breakdown on some of the cases. He is an actual lawyer and can explain why these cases are so fucking embarrasing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-nblE8ps2M
    2
  7.  @shangtsung1362  not when the "soft" left disown tankies and nazbols daily
    1
  8.  @shangtsung1362  dude I argued against your point, and I didn't change the subject. It's not possible to answer yes or no to an assumption that is in bad faith. Affidavits aren't evidence if they don't show up in court, because they don't want to lie under oath. Read my comment again or go away
    1
  9.  @shangtsung1362  You have to accept a more nuanced answer. Many of them are lying, some might not, however many of the affidavits are about things they've witnessed like "I wasn't allowed to be close enough" or "I saw a chinese person and they looked supicious." There rarely isn't anything tangible enough to sue the individual state with fraudlent mismanagement of millions of ballots. The only case Rudy's team won was a case about poll watchers being 20 ft away, so the judge allowed them to move to 6 ft away instead. They've lost 50 besides this one. But all the affidavits talking about dominion, cuba, venazuela or other nonsense that Sydney Powell keeps mentioning are all lying 100% and Qanon conspiracies. Also the "USPS Whistleblower" from that dumb project Veritas video, made an affidavit, yet retracted it when it came to court. He couldn't stand by it under oath so therefore he is lying like many others. That's is my main point and you're engaging with none of what I'm saying. I'm not going to argue on the irrelevant terms you make up.
    1