Comments by "" (@tomrhodes1629) on "How Imaginary Numbers Were Invented" video.

  1. Bad with math? Me too. And yet, I've found that which math and quantum physics look for but will never find. Because, the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    2
  2. Fragile, indeed. For, if it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you want to burst the fragile bubble of illusions and "break on through to the other side."
    2
  3. That's because this is an irrational (limited) world. And the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    2
  4. If math had been explained to me like this in school, I would have forgotten math and physics and would have gone straight to metaphysics. Because, the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    2
  5. Logical Conclusion: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    2
  6. Truth always makes sense, which is why one should never believe anything that DOESN'T make good sense. With that in mind, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    2
  7. If your mind is blown that easily, my suggestion might be too much. Because, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  8. Speaking of "a different plane," here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  9. Here's an opportunity that's hard to come by, because FATE is in control. To wit: A wise man concludes that, if it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want a mind blowing opportunity.
    1
  10. Here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  11. Here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  12. Competition is the folly of children; cooperation is the food of gods. And here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  13. If you really want to figure things out you have to lay down the math. Because, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  14. Yea, that line struck me as far flung, also. My reaction was "SAY WHAT?" But here is the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  15. You don't have the whole picture yet. For, if it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want "the whole picture"....and perhaps your mind blown.
    1
  16. Or they would see how limited and lacking math is. Because, the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  17. Remember that Neo's real name was Thomas. And with that in mind, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  18. Logical Conclusion: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  19. Speaking of fate, I was just about to leave the comment section when I saw your post. With that in mind, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact, as Krishna knew very well. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown. Namaste. (I don't receive YouTube comment notifications, but seekers easily find me.)
    1
  20. Add in Metaphysics for true perfection. For the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  21. Yea, that line struck me as far flung, also. My reaction was "SAY WHAT?" But here is the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  22. "Magic" is simply ignorance attempting to do Miracles, which require KNOWLEDGE. And here is the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  23. I detest math, and yet I've found that which math and physics look for but will never find because of their limitations. With that in mind, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  24. A Netflix series based on Math, which will never find the ultimate answer that it seeks? (Einstein tried and failed.) No thanks. I'd rather have a series that leads people to The Answer. For I've found that which math and quantum physics look for but will never find. Because, the logical conclusion to Math is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  25. If your mind is blown that easily, my suggestion might be too much. Because, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  26. Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman said that if he couldn't explain an advanced physics principle to his first year students, he realized that he didn't truly understand it himself. Simplicity is key. With that in mind, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  27. If it doesn't sink in, not to worry. Math just gives me a headache. And yet, I've found that which math and quantum physics look for but will never find. Because, the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  28. Riveting? Math just gives me a headache. And yet, I've found that which math and quantum physics look for but will never find. Because, the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  29. Don't be so sure. Imagine knowing the Cure for Cancer and The Meaning of Life - RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW. You know what you would get? REJECTED. Because, you would challenge people's false beliefs. And most would rather die than be cured of their cancer or their cult of false belief! I know this to be true from first-hand experience. And concerning this video... The logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth. (I don't receive YouTube comment notifications so that I interact primarily with true seekers, who can easily find my contact info.)
    1
  30. There's a saying: "Life begins at 40." And this was certainly true for me. For example, concerning this video, here's what I know to be the logical conclusion: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  31. Yea, that line struck me as far flung, also. My reaction was "SAY WHAT?" But here is the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  32. Here is the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  33. This video makes me want to do metaphysics, not math. For the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  34. Logical Conclusion: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  35. Yes, very good video. And here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  36. Now just add the metaphysics. Because, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  37. Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman said that if he couldn't explain an advanced physics principle to his first year students, he realized that he didn't truly understand it himself. Simplicity is key. With that in mind, here's the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth if you seriously want your mind blown.
    1
  38. I happen to know for a fact that all people are absolutely equal, regardless of national origin, etc., etc., etc. However, let me add to your national pride anyway. Because, my mother's family emigrated from Italy. She is a saint and I am a prophet of GOD; specifically the prophesied return of the prophet Elijah. And here's my observation concerning this excellent video: The logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth. (I don't receive YouTube comment notifications so that I interact primarily with true seekers, who can easily find my contact info.)
    1
  39. This particular video is indeed special. Because, a wise man sees that its logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  40. Great video. And although it might make math "much more digestible," it should also give you indigestion. Because, the logical conclusion is this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1
  41. I wish schools taught metaphysics. Because, here is the logical conclusion to all of this: If it requires imaginary numbers to describe something that we call "reality," that which we call "reality" is imaginary, and is NOT absolute Reality. And this is indeed a fact. See "The Book of GOD" at A Course in Truth.
    1