Comments by "" (@arturferrao7353) on "HistoryLegends"
channel.
-
@evials9123 "This whole conflict started with Hamas, therefore the blood is on their hands."
Hamas didn't existed 75 years ago. Zionists, on the other hand, existed way before that and have been planning this genocide for decades. Here's the evidence for my claim:
Jabotinsky frequently accused Labor Zionism of hypocrisy; in his view, the creation of a Jewish state had always meant imposing the will of Zionism on the Palestinian
Arabs, and the resistance of the latter to the former was but
the natural and logical consequence of Zionist objectives.
According to Jabotinsky, Zionist actions had been carried
out against the wishes of the Arab majority.
Zionist colonization, even the most restricted, must
either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the
will of the native population. This colonization can,
therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population-an
iron wall which the native population cannot break
through. This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs.
To formulate it any other way would be hypocrisy.
He also pointed out that Zionists believed in an “iron wall”:
in this sense, there is no meaningful difference between our “militarists” and our “vegetarians." One prefers an iron wall of Jewish bayonets, the other proposes
an iron wall of British bayonets, the third proposes an
agreement with Baghdad, and appears to be satisfied
with Baghdad’s bayonets-a strange and somewhat
risky taste-but we all applaud, day and night, the iron wall.70
Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
-
1