Comments by "" (@arturferrao7353) on "Hezbollah Attack: Israel Army Can't Handle, Sends SOS To USA? Defence Minister Calls Biden Aide" video.

@RonTriebel-lt7ig "October the 7th" The October 7 in question: Furthermore, during a lengthy interview on Israel's Channel 12, Porat speaks of intense gunfire after Israeli forces arrived and elaborates that, although the resistance fighters were heavily armed, she never saw them shoot captives or threaten them with their guns. She also highlights that the Israeli army announced their arrival at the settlement “with a hail of gunfire,” catching the resistance fighters and their captives by surprise. Source: TheCradle -> Survivor of Hamas assault says Israeli army 'undoubtedly' killed their own civilians
2
@RonTriebel-lt7ig That's the best that you can do? Go on a rampage of random generated sentesnces tot ry to distract everyone from demonstrated facts?
2
@heheye461 "So we don't know, what was first action." Here are they, being planned decades before israel had been founded: Jabotinsky frequently accused Labor Zionism of hypocrisy; in his view, the creation of a Jewish state had always meant imposing the will of Zionism on the Palestinian Arabs, and the resistance of the latter to the former was but the natural and logical consequence of Zionist objectives. According to Jabotinsky, Zionist actions had been carried out against the wishes of the Arab majority. Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
@heheye461 And: Zionist colonization, even the most restricted, must either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the will of the native population. This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population-an iron wall which the native population cannot break through. This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs. To formulate it any other way would be hypocrisy. Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
@heheye461 And: He also pointed out that Zionists believed in an “iron wall”: in this sense, there is no meaningful difference between our “militarists” and our “vegetarians." One prefers an iron wall of Jewish bayonets, the other proposes an iron wall of British bayonets, the third proposes an agreement with Baghdad, and appears to be satisfied with Baghdad’s bayonets-a strange and somewhat risky taste-but we all applaud, day and night, the iron wall. Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
@RonTriebel-lt7ig "Excuse me! who has declared war on who" here's who did it, decades before israel had been founded: Jabotinsky frequently accused Labor Zionism of hypocrisy; in his view, the creation of a Jewish state had always meant imposing the will of Zionism on the Palestinian Arabs, and the resistance of the latter to the former was but the natural and logical consequence of Zionist objectives. According to Jabotinsky, Zionist actions had been carried out against the wishes of the Arab majority. Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
@RonTriebel-lt7ig And: Zionist colonization, even the most restricted, must either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the will of the native population. This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population-an iron wall which the native population cannot break through. This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs. To formulate it any other way would be hypocrisy. Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
@RonTriebel-lt7ig And: He also pointed out that Zionists believed in an “iron wall”: in this sense, there is no meaningful difference between our “militarists” and our “vegetarians." One prefers an iron wall of Jewish bayonets, the other proposes an iron wall of British bayonets, the third proposes an agreement with Baghdad, and appears to be satisfied with Baghdad’s bayonets-a strange and somewhat risky taste-but we all applaud, day and night, the iron wall. Source: Expulsion of the Palestinians - The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha
1
@RonTriebel-lt7ig And here's a video of it: YT -> NewzFirst English -> Israeli Airforce Apache Fired At Own Citizens When Hamas Attacked, Benjamin Netanyahu In The Dock
1
@raymondmailloux9593 Funny that you refer that: It is the Betar movement, with its adopted fascist ideas and displays, that forms the prime target for allegations of Zionist ideological sympathy for Nazism. Signs of Zionism’s Nazi-fascist sympathies are adduced from the actions and statements of some of its leading figures. For example, in 1928, Abba Ahimeir, a leading member of the far-right wing of the Revisionist movement, wrote a regular column in Do’ar ha-Yom titled “Mi-Pinkaso shel Fashistan” (From a fascist’s notebook). In 1931 he played a central role in the founding of Berit ha-Biryonim, an underground group devoted to opposing British policy in Palestine. At the trial of members of this organization, who disrupted a speech delivered by Berit Shalom leader Norman Bentwich at Hebrew University in early 1932, their lawyer declared: “yes, we Revisionists have a great admiration for Hitler. Hitler has saved Germany. Source: Yishuv Zionism: Its Attitude to Nazism and the Third Reich Reconsidered
1