Comments by "BottleBriđ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż" (@BottleBri) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
43
-
37
-
20
-
7
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Robert schoch is just as frustrated as the rest of us with the total and deliberate lack of interest in investigating the great pyramid by Egyptian âauthoritiesâ. For those who donât know, there are numerous suspicious blocks in both the kings and queens chambers which really should be simply drilled and an endoscopic camera put through to see whatâs behind them. Non load bearing blocks, which could be moved in and out etc in ancient times when the pyramid was built. The theory is that when the great pyramid was first broken into, the accounts tell us that it was basically empty. No body, no treasures etc, no writings on any walls telling of how great the pharaoh was, nothing.
Now, there would seem to be a massive mystery here- unless you think of it as a trick. If you can make the FIRST people who break into it, think that there is nothing there, then EVERYONE who comes after believes that any treasures have already been removed. This is basically the point that we are still at today. But an awful lot of very intelligent people have studied the pyramid in modern times, and some actually were allowed to drill through blocks in the passage leading to the queens chamber and discover a series of voids behind the blocks. Others have looked at the patterns of the granite blocks of both chambers and noticed that a few in strategic areas could actually be removed to reveal a passageway and possible other undiscovered rooms behind them. For example, there is a non load bearing granite block adjacent to the coffer in the kings chamber which is exactly the right size to allow the stone coffer to pass through it. This should be of major importance to ANYONE who has anything at all to do with the pyramid, as it greatly suggests that there MUST be an as yet undiscovered passageway leading off from the kings chamber. There are other blocks in both chambers which serve no âweight bearingâ purpose, suggesting they are hiding something behind. The theory is that the chambers were empty because they were never intended to hold anything in them in the first place. They were a ploy to trick tomb robbers into thinking the pyramid was empty. This is huge. The implication is that the body of Khufu himself, along with all his treasures may be still there just waiting to be discovered, and all it would take is a long drill and an endoscopic camera to find out if these passages exist. The trouble is, the people who could give permission for this exploration are absolutely not interested in the slightest. They believe they know everything there is to know and they turn their faces away from any evidence from dedicated intelligent sources that would suggest there are new passages to be found in the great pyramid. Itâs an absolute disgrace really, because as archaeologists themselves itâs their JOB to investigate or at the very least listen to what people are saying to them. But still they refuse. As long as this stubborn attitude prevails, nothing more will ever be discovered there.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
 @geoden Iâm 51 and when I was 18 I saw a ufo fly low and slowly over the roof of my cottage. A round disc with a flat bottom, circular red lights dotted around the edge facing downward, and a thick rim around the base. No wings, rotors, jets, no downdraft. Just floated along, Iâve no idea how it was keeping itself up. It made a low humming sound, thatâs what made me look up. It was astonishing to see. It will never leave me. 33 years ago now. This thing was defying gravity in some way 33 years ago. It was about 25-30 ft across. So not that big. I didnât see any windows or aliens. I donât know what was flying it. But if Iâd had a stone I couldâve hit the bottom of it. This was on the Scottish south east coast and it headed across the back field and towards the sea. Thatâs the main reason I believe. Iâve actually seen one close up. If you had been with me, you would believe as well. Alas, I think you are a closed minded case. Your minds made up. âThere are more things in heaven and earth geoDen, than are dreamt of in your philosophyâ.
1
-
 @geoden âthere never has been or ever will be evidence of aliens on earthâ. Really? What have people been seeing in the sky for thousands of years and especially since the 1940âs? When you board a plane you put your life in the trust of the pilot, yet if that same man told you he saw a ufo you would think he had a screw loose? There have been hundreds of thousands of sightings, really good ones, since way back in the 20th century, seen by civilian and military pilots in a sky where there really is nothing to see up there except sky? Have all these pilots been mistaken? Because Iâm sure they would disagree with your point of view. You havenât seen one- so they donât exist?
Well thatâs not a very scientific approach is it? You say itâs too far. How do you know what a race maybe 100,000 years more advanced than us can do? You know that too do you? What was it I saw in 1988? And by your reckoning it must be from earth remember? Why are we still flying jets when we have had antigravity for decades? I literally SAW one of them. Close up. Most are seen by pilots. Are you really saying that every pilot who has had a close encounter with a ufo (I know, unidentified) since the 1940âs, civilian and military, some of the smartest people you can find, not a single one of them saw an alien disc? Not one? Thousands and thousands of pilots alone, never mind peopleâs sightings from the ground over the past 80 years and more. Hundreds of thousands of real descriptions of flying, solid craft, performing aerial feats impossible at that time and even now? Not one of them was from somewhere else? Not one. Literally millions of people are ALL wrong, and you are right? Your mind is very very closed my friend. So closed that you will not entertain the possibility of learning something you didnt previously know. Isnât that what science is all about? Being open to possibilities? Yet you refuse to read a book that may make you think. Youâd probably rather burn it than entertain the possibility of having your mind changed. One day you will see something, then youâll know alright. Itâs sad that it would take that, and not the sheer weight of evidence to make you believe in something.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
 @theinformationbomber7102 you are entitled to think that if you like. But the way he was utterly outboxed and outfought by Douglas, and the fact it would be a Tyson rematch rather than a Holyfield fight that Douglas didnât want, would suggest that Douglas would be just as up for the rematch as he was the first fight. Whatever, itâs all hypothetical now. But what we DO know is that the only round you could give to Tyson was the eighth because of the knockdown. Never mind the long count, a boxer listens to the referee not the timekeeper, and Tyson got ample time to rise too but was in no position to continue,- and no wonder, after the complete hiding he had been given up to that time. Iâve always liked Tyson but I think credit where itâs due too, and you can only imagine what an Ali the same age as Tyson wouldâve done to Tyson that night. Douglas turned in the miraculous fight of his life that night, and I donât believe it was a bad Tyson he fought. Itâs sad that people take away from Douglas in that, his greatest win. Watch the fight, itâs a masterclass of boxing against power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1