Comments by "crazyfvck" (@crazyfvck) on "Boston Dynamics"
channel.
-
2
-
1
-
@kathleenr4047 Because so many people seem to think of these things as 'toys' or 'novelties,' and they don't consider the ramifications of what these designers are doing. There are already a number of robots at the factory where I work, but they are stationary units, performing repetitive tasks, and they must still be operated in part by humans. But in the near future, machines like the ones shown here will start replacing many of us at our jobs. A lot of people have been fairly safe in many industries, because they do jobs that can't be sent overseas. But that will change when these units become commonplace. Why would companies pay $50,000 a year for someone to do a certain job, when one of these robots can do it, essentially for free? Sure, there's quite a large investment to get started, but that will pay itself off fairly quickly. They don't have to give them time off, or benefits, or anything like that. The power to charge their batteries can come from renewable energy, and all the company needs to worry about is replacing the occasional part that goes bad. And, as if the thought of millions of Americans permanently losing their jobs isn't bad enough, just think of some of the other things that these machines could be used for.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1