Comments by "Eli Nope" (@elinope4745) on "TED" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. Xanxei i actually stick by my stances. you can call me a troll, i think trolling is a art. i troll with logic, and support things that are reasonable, especially if it is reasonable yet unpopular. cat calling really isn't a bad thing. some women don't want to be cat called, others do. but censorship isn't equality. trying to make people equal slaves is not a good stance for human rights. we should liberate those who are oppressed instead of equally oppressing everyone. being cat called is not being oppressed, it is being annoyed. it is not being harassed unless it persists after the person doing the cat calling has been informed of the desire of the person who is being called to not be called. the norm is not to be protected from unwanted solicitation, rather the norm is to be exposed to solicitation (either wanted or unwanted) unless specifically communicating the desire not to be. solicitation of those who have communicated the desire not be solicited is a form of harassment but to limit this just to cat calling and not to other forms of unwanted solicitation is to focus on issues to specific groups of women over everyone else. it communicates a hidden message that this specific group is more important than other groups, and that is not equality. imagine a scenario in which a woman walks down the street wearing a shirt that openly and clearly states that they do not wish to be cat called, and someone ignores the message and still cat calls them. now imagine a person is on the internet and they are running an adblocker program that clearly states their desire to not be advertised towards. they run the program and yet some company finds a way to advertise to them anyway. these two situations have an equal amount of harassment. both are being exposed to unwanted solicitation despite their effort to communicate their desire not to be exposed to such communications. now imagine a guy wearing a shirt that openly states "don't expose me to your feminist propaganda". despite the shirt, a feminist tells him that cat calling is harassment. she is now just as guilty as the above mentioned guy who cat called the woman who had a shirt saying that she did not wish to be exposed to cat calls. the core debate is about solicited and unsolicited communication and the desirability of having such communications aimed at you. yes it is annoying to be exposed to unwanted unsolicited communication. but the line for harassment can't be drawn there as it would infringe upon free communication. the line to harassment must be drawn after a communication is made that informs the soliciting party that the person does not wish to be exposed to such communication. only after such a communication is made and ignored is it harassment. until that point it is simply unsolicited communication. (which may be annoying and unwanted, but still not harassment). to attempt to silence or control men as a whole in order to protect some women (not all women are opposed to cat calling), is a clear sign of placing the wants and desires of women over and above the liberty of men. currently both have the right to cat call each other and so currently on the issue of cat calling there is equality. to ask for men to be censored to ask for inequality and female superiority. neither men nor women have the right to be protected from unwanted unsolicited communication. laws to stop such communication will always attack the right of free speech for others. the line between free speech and harassment is drawn only after communication of intent not to be contacted (this can be a shirt, a restraining order, a sign, or an adblocking program). but even then some forms of harassment are still legal (especially true of commercial interests such as phone based advertising to people on a "no call" list or advertising to people running ad blocking programs). i do think that we should shine light upon the plight of attractive women. they gain a massive amount of unwanted solicitation. this is one of the many down sides of being very attractive. the public narrative is that being attractive is always a good thing. this is not true. there are many ups and downs to being attractive just like there is to being unattractive. pretty girls do not always have it better than ugly girls, like all things in life these things are circumstantial. and privilege is circumstantial as well. anyhow, i hope you understand what i am trying to say, and why i would oppose opposition to cat calling. i stand on this on the right to free speech. everyone has the right to free speech. nobody has the right to not be offended.
    3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3