Youtube comments of Coreysaurus (@ggadguy).
-
698
-
259
-
256
-
86
-
32
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MadXMax187 I agree. I think running a third party candidate usually drains votes away from the main two parties, unfortunately. I also agree, that the positive with a third party campaign is they can help promote issues, like Ross Perot warning about the debt, or giving a platform to Nader, or whoever. America should at least hear more than just two views, since there are realistically 5 points of view (right, left, moderate, statist, libertarian).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NoiDontWantFries People are people. To some degree, all people want to use some type of vice. It could be alcohol, jerking off, pot, sniffing cleaner, binging on food, erotic asphyxiation, extreme biking, etc. All of those things could be really harmful. Legalizing "dangerous" things or activities will actually take the criminal, black market element out of things. Instead of funding gangs, you might buy from Marlboro. Plus, cops would concentrate on real crime like murder and rape.
1
-
1
-
@oolong2 Yes, some individuals can't make these choices because they don't prioritize health over eating something unhealthy. We do have to take some level of responsibility. At the same businesses hire all sorts of scientists, researchers, nutritionists, health experts that are involved in creating our food, which do this because they want to appeal to people's desires of fast food, healthy food, organic food, cheap food, knock-offs, etc. Freedom gives us more choices.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Food prices have doubled due to money printing (i.e. bailouts, stimulus, QE 1 and QE 2) which greatly effects countries where people live on $2 a day. You can see that non-food items like copper, silver, gold, platinum, aluminum, tin and other commodities have also doubled. The CRB Commodity Index is also up. Sorry Thom, it's not just weather, which I agree effects prices, but across the board commodities have gone up due to Federal Reserve policies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thom has been saying this over and over again. Oil isn't going up because of speculation. Most of the commodities on the CRB Index are going up like corn, wheat, soybeans, gold, silver, copper, sugar, hogs, cotton, etc. This is because of the dollar falling BIG TIME. Thom knows this because he pimps gold on his radio show like Glenn Beck. He knows the real reason, and expert economists know it, but he'd rather give you false assumptions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oolong2 When I say we don't have private roads, I meant to say the majority of roads are not private. There are certainly some private roads, and even travel systems at malls, businesses, large plots of land, etc. Yes, toll roads too.
In a free market, which we do not have, I bet you could pay for roads with billboard sponsorship, and not stop, just like we get with free or near free television. But it's not for me to decide. The best ideas would come to the top. I'd hate checkpoints too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hollywoodt00 I am not an expert, but here are 15 people who are financial experts in my book: Jim Rogers, Doug Casey, Eric Sprott, Jim Rickards, Ben Davies, Marc Faber, Peter Schiff, Jim Paplava, David McAlvany, John Hathaway, Bill Fleckenstein, James Turk, Chris Whalen, Rick Rule, Sean Brodrick just to name a few . I bet you haven't heard of even half of these guys. I listen. I learn. I'm giving you a gift of knowledge right now. Start Googling these folks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lynchmobb2000 Actually, the "rich" in this country have the second highest tax rate, just behind Japan. BUT they find loopholes. In general, everyone pays too many taxes for war, corporate welfare, and, we have to admit it, social programs takes up a huge % of the budget. We need to start getting creative solving our debt problem. Also, the middle class has slowly become more poor because both parties support a declining dollar, higher taxes, and NAFTA and GATT regulations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm a libertarian and subscribe to Thom's YouTube channel because there are many areas of agreement liberals and libertarians have: pro gay rights, pro-choice, anti-war, pro immigrant, anti PATRIOT Act, pro civil liberties, anti War on Drugs, pro free speech, tolerance, etc. There's a lot we can agree on. If Democrats would just free markets and cut spending I'd vote for more of them. By far, from a libertarian perspective, Clinton was better than Bush when it came to balancing a budget.
1
-
@BJBoi18 I don't vote right wing. I vote for liberty. Seriously check out the World's Smallest Political Quiz or the Nolan Chart to see why it's not left versus right, but liberty versus tyranny.
I'm AGAINST the bankster bailouts, the wars, the Military Industrial Complex, the drug war, NAFTA, GATT, corporate welfare, the Patriot Act, and FOR free immigration, gay rights, free speech, civil liberties, and I'm just getting started. Am I a right wing voter? Nope.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As far as the Fair Tax, I don't think they'd see a reduction in their taxes since they buy big homes, lavish dinners, pricey vacations, expensive cars. I'm still opposed to it, simply because it will turn every business, contractor, vendor, to be a tax collector for the government. Plus, we should be having a debate on how much we are taxed versus what method is used. In my opinion, we should fund the government by more user fees, tariffs, and less aggressive means.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oolong2 These aren't hypotheticals. Markets do provide safety as a product feature. Yes, a consumer may not investigate the a supply chain, only the end product, but the businesses supplying the products do get private certification. They want the highest quality because consumers demand it. That why businesses get privately certified by HACCP, ISO, FS 22000, IFS, SQF, just to name a few. Plus, consumers rate millions of products and sellers on Amazon, eBay, Angie's List, Yellow Pages, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheyCallHimTheTops I'll also add that I am against a lot of what big corporations do, for example, eminent domain, bailouts, lobbying to write the regulations to squash small business, subsidies, tax-write offs, loops-holes, etc. Ideally, since I'm an ideolog libertarian, we should have less corporations and more small businesses that don't rely on government subsidies. The power should be back to the people, instead of corporate lobbying for more power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oolong2 Here's the principle for business. Do business as long as there is no force or fraud. No government welfare to corporations, subsidies, tax breaks, loopholes or bailouts to Wall Street. Wealth should be earned and not taken through government law or favors. If Kochs steal, then SHAME on them!
Also, libertarians and conservatives disagree on many issues: The wars, corporate welfare, abortion, immigration, civil liberties, gay rights, drug war, police state, speech, National ID, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not defending Corporations, since they are creations of the state. I support free markets, but not corporations as they exist today. Again, check out the Mike Shanklin video. It's long, but he helps explain the difference, which not many people can distinct.
Libertarianism is NOT Feudalism or Victorian rule. We don't believe in queens, kings, rulers, dictators, etc. Human betterment should be built through peaceful, negotiated, non-violent means instead of rulers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Umberto2 Technically, the recession has been going on during the early Bush years and continues to happen today. You can't just look at the GDP alone, but take into consideration the purchasing power of the dollar, unemployment %, number of people on food stamps, the markets, debt, etc. I do believe Obama will continue the economic downturn because his fiscal policies, as far as Bush deficit spending, are still happening, but only bigger.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@YY4Me133 Haven't we tried "trickle up" for the past 100 years? Look at the creation of HUD, rental assistance, Headstart, WIC, Energy programs, S-CHIP, social security, pell grants, student loans, Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, unemployment insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, all for the poor. What program is going to be the be all, end all welfare program or solution? Real trickle up is to limit regulations on small businesses, allow people to keep more of their income and opt out of SSI.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oolong2 You are correct that there are smaller governments, in size, but they have great influence on the lives of their people through their power.
You can indicate big government by the amount of laws created, regulations, various programs, corporate subsidies, countries they invade, occupy or establish bases in, taxes they acquire, etc. By all measurements, the U.S. government is taking on too many things and has expanded their budgets greatly, from both parties.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oolong2 Safety doesn't need to come from the federal level. I'd prefer a variety of standards set by local governments, communities, local businesses, different packaging, competitive safety standards, the Internet, stores, etc. that accommodates the community best at various prices. Many high cost regulations do make the poor poorer, which is why regulation should vary. And when government gives big fines, it diverts businesses to buy safety products, cattle vaccines or cleaner facilities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chromelung66 I agree that it's a left versus right game, when the real debate should be civil liberties and freedom versus government tyranny and war. The Republicans and Democrats are BOTH for endless wars, more government, more debt, a lower dollar, more corporate bailouts, corporate subsidies, entitlements, the failed war on drugs, the police state (Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, wiretapping, etc.), and much more. The government has been growing while the economy keeps shrinking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eirefrance First, Capitalism is not Corporatism. True Capitalism only happens when there are no favors or special tax breaks for corporations, no bailouts, no regulations that favor corporations, etc.
There are many kinds of capital too like physical, natural, social human, and cultural capital. In a nutshell, if we are free to acquire capital, we trade, save, invent, produce we create capital which in turns helps us trade, save invent, produce all for greater prosperity. Then repeat & grow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@leftysergeant If things don't have a cost-benefit analysis, and money is squandered, that's less money for health care which saves lives. Any time any money in the economy is misallocated, like bombing other countries in wasteful wars, those dollars could have been spent by us, creating jobs, spending money in the economy, or on better uses, Remember, the corporations are the ones who write the regulations and eventually take over federal departments. I agree with Thom, stop the lobbyists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1