Comments by "Biomorphic" (@biomorphic) on "Military Summary"
channel.
-
58
-
38
-
38
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This is true and false at the same time. The war had a huge impact on the US inflation, because the US didn't have that money, it was force to print it. Second, as a consequence of the war against Ukraine, Russia lost a lot of old equipment, that has been replaced with new one. Russia renovated factories, improved the logistic, and it is currently the most powerful and organised army in the world, which it was not, before this war. And finally, Russia learned how to fight a conflict in 2024, which is something no one had no idea. And all the US investment went in the wrong direction. The navy is practically useless, because with drones and missiles it takes a minute to destroy any ship, even the biggest ones. Tanks are mostly obsolete pieces of crap, because they have no counter against simple drones, or javelins. And Russia improved a lot its production of drones as well. So, what he said could have been true, but it is really not. I think Russia is now in a way better position it was before the war, because it will continue the production of armaments even after the war ends. The US fucked up badly, like it does all the time.
4
-
3
-
You need the taxes of 6 people to support a single soldier. This was recently declared by Zelensky. It is not how much you pay them, it is the fact you take someone who was contributing to the society, having a salary and paying taxes, you train him, even if for two weeks only, and immediately he does not produce anything, but he becomes a cost. Even if you do not pay him, you still have to provide him with food, clothes, and all the necessary. Who is going to pay for it? Supposedly US and EU. But the money ain't coming, so they can only replace the deads, but not recruit all the soldiers they would need. More soldiers means more ammunition, more rifles, mortars, shells, equipment. If what was provided was not even enough for the army they had, how do you think they can provide for twice the soldiers employed so far? They simply can't, unless the US and EU give them 300 billions. War is expensive. I know at least a hundred of Ukrainians, fit for the army, who didn't get call. They are still working in IT. They used to pay only 5% of taxes, now they pay 2.5%. They only recruit people who have no job or with low level jobs. Ukraine is not running out of men, just do a simple math and you will find out. Ukraine does not have the money to recruit the men. Women will not be enlisted, unless they volunteer. @@Satyricon42
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I am sorry, but you don't know if and when the Russians will be able to intercept ATACMS. The war is stalled, Ukraine and Russia cannot advance. Tanks are useless, they get immediately destroyed. We won't see any significative advancement till the next spring. Ukraine is indeed getting stronger, long range missiles and the F-16 will definitely make a difference, and their air defense is also getting stronger, because they are getting the entire Greek anti air defense system, on top of that, Germany donated another Patriot. They will not be enough to win the war, but both Putin and Zelensky need desperately an exit strategy. Contrary to what Ritter and Macgregor are saying, Ukraine is not done, and this war is far to be over.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2