Youtube comments of Biomorphic (@biomorphic).

  1. 252
  2. 160
  3. 148
  4. 136
  5. 94
  6. 87
  7. 84
  8. 75
  9. 72
  10. 70
  11. 62
  12. 59
  13. 58
  14. 55
  15. 55
  16. 54
  17. 54
  18. 52
  19. 51
  20. 51
  21. 50
  22. 42
  23. 41
  24. 39
  25. 38
  26. 38
  27. 38
  28. 36
  29. 36
  30. 36
  31. 36
  32. 34
  33. 33
  34. 31
  35. 31
  36. 31
  37. 27
  38. 26
  39. 24
  40. 24
  41. 23
  42. 22
  43. 22
  44. 22
  45. 20
  46. 20
  47. 20
  48. 19
  49. 19
  50. 19
  51. 19
  52. 18
  53. 18
  54. 17
  55. 17
  56. 17
  57. 17
  58. 16
  59. 16
  60. 16
  61. 16
  62. 16
  63. 16
  64. 16
  65. 16
  66. 16
  67. 16
  68. 15
  69. Most company do Scrum + DevOps, which means there is a DevOps engineer as part of the team. This person is basically a system administrator with cloud knowledge, usually AWS, less frequently Azure and GCP. He can't write a program and he has no idea when to use DocumentDB and when DynamoDB. The issue with this approach is that only one person knows how to deploy and running the services. To deal with this issue, sometimes companies create a DevOps team, but this often does not work either, because it becomes a bottleneck. Sometimes developers need very specialised tools, like Kafka, Flink, that DevOps simply can't scale or operate properly, due to the massive amount of configuration required. So for me it's way better if there are no DevOps at all. Facebook instead employs SE in teams called Production Engineering Teams. Basically these are skilled developers with deep knowledge of the operating system and application they run. People who can debug the code. Facebook does not use Kubernetes or ECS or whatever, so these teams ensure a service, or a bunch of services, are up and running. But do not make mistakes, these are not DevOps, these are skilled Software Engineers. What I personally did, as tech lead and CTO, was to create a platform. In small startups I created the platform myself, and then developer used it. My colleagues were surprised we were able to cut 80% of the code. In bigger companies I usually create a team, that I call R&D, but it's basically PE, that is responsible to build the platform. I do not think one solution fits all use cases. But PE for me is better, because the entire team acquires knowledge of the platform using it. They learn how to deploy, how to make improvements to the platform itself. I am a huge fan of PE and monorepo.
    15
  70. 15
  71. 15
  72. 15
  73. 15
  74. 14
  75. 14
  76. 14
  77. 14
  78. 14
  79. 14
  80. 14
  81. 13
  82. 13
  83. 13
  84. 13
  85. 13
  86. 13
  87. 12
  88. I was Karate regional champion at the age of 13. Then my master left dojo due to a disagreement with the other master, because the last started to sell ninja stuff to the kids. The master who left was a 3rd Dan Black Belt, and he was fond of Karate. He went to teach in another city, and so I ended up my Karate experience, because I didn't like the other master. Later on in life, in my mid 30, I picked up boxing. And there I learn how to fight, for real. And I realised that most martial arts are more a form of art than combat. I have been in a few bad situation. In one occasion I have been threatened with a knife. I could not run away, because it was inside an apartment, so I took cover from the other side of the kitchen table, where the aggressor could not reach me, and I called the police with my mobile phone. The police asked me where I was and they told me to give my phone to the aggressor. After the police spoke to the aggressor, he decided to put the knife down and let me go. I kept my distance during the entire operation. I would have not engaged in a fight against someone with a knife, I would have used something like a chair, eventually, certainly I would not have fought the aggressor without something I could have used as a weapon. Two other times I had to fight, and I overcome my opponents. The attempted robberies failed when the aggressors realised I was not an easy target. They were both scared of my reaction. Both the aggressors tried to hit me, but I was able to dodge and grab their neck, smashing the head against a wall. When their start suffocating, they begged me to stop. It was two scums, in two separate occasions. These people do not expect you to fight back. I could see terror in their eyes. Do not fuck around with people just because they are smaller than you.
    12
  89. 12
  90. 12
  91. 12
  92. 12
  93. 12
  94. 12
  95. 12
  96. 11
  97. 11
  98. 11
  99. 11
  100. 11
  101. 11
  102. 11
  103. 11
  104. 11
  105. 11
  106. 11
  107. 11
  108. 11
  109. 11
  110. 10
  111. 10
  112. 10
  113. 10
  114. 10
  115. 10
  116. 10
  117. 10
  118. 10
  119. 10
  120. 9
  121. 9
  122. 9
  123. 9
  124. 9
  125. 9
  126. 9
  127. 9
  128. 9
  129. 9
  130. 9
  131. 9
  132. 8
  133. 8
  134. 8
  135. 8
  136. 8
  137. 8
  138. 8
  139. 8
  140. 8
  141. 8
  142. 8
  143. 8
  144. 8
  145. 8
  146. 8
  147. 8
  148. 8
  149. 8
  150. 8
  151. 8
  152. 7
  153. 7
  154. 7
  155. 7
  156. 7
  157. 7
  158. 7
  159. 7
  160. 7
  161. 7
  162. 7
  163. 7
  164. 6
  165. 6
  166. 6
  167. 6
  168. 6
  169. 6
  170. 6
  171. 6
  172. 6
  173. 6
  174. 6
  175. 6
  176. 6
  177. 6
  178. 6
  179. 6
  180. 6
  181. 6
  182. 6
  183. 6
  184. 6
  185. 6
  186. 6
  187. 6
  188. 5
  189. 5
  190. 5
  191. 5
  192. 5
  193. 5
  194. 5
  195. 5
  196. 5
  197. 5
  198. 5
  199. 5
  200. 5
  201. 5
  202. 5
  203. 5
  204. 5
  205. 5
  206. 5
  207. 5
  208. 5
  209. 5
  210. 5
  211. 5
  212. 5
  213. 5
  214. 5
  215. 5
  216. 5
  217. 5
  218. 5
  219. 5
  220. 5
  221. 5
  222. 5
  223. 5
  224. 5
  225. 5
  226. 5
  227. 5
  228. 4
  229. 4
  230. 4
  231. 4
  232. 4
  233. 4
  234. 4
  235. 4
  236. 4
  237. 4
  238. 4
  239. 4
  240. 4
  241. 4
  242. 4
  243. 4
  244. 4
  245. 4
  246. 4
  247. 4
  248. 4
  249. 4
  250. 4
  251. 4
  252. 4
  253. 4
  254. 4
  255. 4
  256. 4
  257. 4
  258. 4
  259. 4
  260. 4
  261. 4
  262. 4
  263. 4
  264. 4
  265. 4
  266. 4
  267. 4
  268. 4
  269. 4
  270. 4
  271. 4
  272. 4
  273. I want to add that in the interview published on HistoryChannel, Yevgeny Prigozhin, chief of Wagner, said they would need 3 years to conquer Dnipro. This means, most likely, that Russia will end this before it reaches Dnipro, at the border with Donbass. If, of course, Ukraine will be willing to negotiate. A consideration needs to be made. This war costs a lot of money. The reason Putin didn't go all in are the following: 1) There are not enough equipment (tanks, vehicles, ammunition, rifles, uniforms, rockets, etc.) for a wide scale war, with over 1.5 millions troops on the ground. The current production can barely supply the actual needs. As you have noticed there is a rocket attack every two weeks only. 2) Equipment costs a lot of money to be produced. Putin said clearly he doesn't want to strangle the economy. He prefers to go on for years at this pace, rather than go all in, ramp up drastically the production, convert factories, etc. So he won't do that, unless he gets in a war against NATO or the survival of Russia is threatened. 3) Putin knows that he needs to have inspectors in the country, he needs to have some of his people in the Ukrainian government, otherwise Ukraine will reinforce the army, and it will eventually attack the Donbas in the future. He has been fooled once, I hope he will not be fooled twice. 4) For how long this war will go on depends by the US. Europe does what the US asks, so I won't even consider it. The USA just allocated another 10 billions today, or yesterday. As long as military aid is provided, and so is provided the money to run the public services, Ukraine will go on. 5) People do not believe me, but Ukraine can mobilise another million of troops. None of the people I know has been mobilised, only one to be fair. Of over 130 people who are all good for service. It is true that Zelensky changed the law, and now you can join the army when you are 16 years old, but only on voluntary base, as far as I know. You won't be conscripted otherwise if you are not 18. My ex colleague told me they can mobilise much more. He is from Ukraine. The meat grind is not a problem, for now. 6) The more the US supports Ukraine, the more this war will last. One of the reason Putin didn't use this 350k. some say 500k, troops in Belarus (I doubt so many) is that Putin is expecting a Ukrainian counter offensive. Russia needs men and equipment to handle it, whatever is going to be. Russia cannot afford another mistake like Kherson or Liman. 7) Finally, this war can end, unexpectedly, any time, through a negotiation. 8) Biden has still 2 years to go. It's a long time. US may continue to support Ukraine, unless Ukraine cannot be supported anymore, which is still not the case.
    4
  274. 4
  275. 4
  276. 4
  277. 4
  278. 4
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. 3
  288. 3
  289. 3
  290. 3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. 3
  300. 3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. The reality is that girls use Tinder, and other equivalent apps, and they look for very attractive males. Before men needed to have qualities, now they just need to be hot, because the male does not approach anymore, it's the female that makes the choice. If you are not attractive you won't match any girl. The reality is that a very small percentage of men, probably less than 5%, sleeps with all the girls. I live in a big European city, and I consider myself a 5.5, a 6 on a good day. Since Tinder, I am having an hard time to find a partner, because I rarely match with girls, and they there is no the opportunity to know each other. It does not matter if the hot guy does not have personality, women don't care. Females do not change very much. I remember they were all in love with the same guy, at the same time. This does not change when they get older, they all want the same hot guys. Of course there are exceptions, but there is no point considering them, since they are exceptions. In addition, women are now fully independent, even the ones with no talent have the opportunity to make money on OnlyFans. So they do not really look for a partner, or a provider, they look for hot guys only. They would consider a provider, only if particularly rich, but the most of us are not. And when I say rich, I mean that you need to drive a Ferrari, and have a big house in the city center. The reality is that our value is particularly low, because we do not have much to offer. They do not need a provider anymore. They can just chat with random guys and setup a dinner date with a different one every day, and then ghost the guys. Your value is different in a different country. In Brazil, for example, I had more opportunities. In Africa I was like Brad Pitt, if you know what I mean. But in Europe, I am no one. But do not worry, this is going to change with AI. Most women will not make any money from Twitch, OnlyFans, Fansly or webcam websites anymore. They will all be replaced by generative AI. You'll be able to create your dream girl. This will happen very fast, and it will be the end of feminism. Women will need again a provider, because many jobs will disappear. There will be an inflation of prostitutes at low prices.
    3
  321.  @arthurtane6505  they are no better, Zelensky has 3.5 millions villa in Italy, just beside the villas of Russian oligarchs. The wife of a politician of the Zelensky's party, tried to leave the country with 22 millions in cash at the begin of the war. Ukraine also has the same oligarchic system there is in Russia. I have been in Ukraine multiple times, and I know a lot of people there. Also, you should know that meanwhile the people who work normal jobs pay regular taxes, programmers and people working in the IT pay only 2% of taxes. Before the war they were paying 5% only. In Russia all the people pay the same, 13%. In Ukraine instead there is such disparity. The middle class is made of people working in IT, who make more money than the programmers working in Italy, Spain, Portugal, even France, because they don't pay taxes and their salary are in line with the ones are paid in France. Source, myself, managed and hired over 60 people there. Also, this thing about the nazi is true. Please watch a movie called Brother 2 if you can find it. It's a cult Russian movie released in 2000. You will see one of the character saying Ukrainian nazis twice in the movie. It's not something new, since the movie is dated 2000, way before the Crimea invasion. Maybe you didn't know, but nazis burned alive other Ukrainians because they were pro Russia. This happened in several occasions, at least two documented. Once they closed over 40 people in a building and they set the building on fire. Nazi Ukrainians burned Ukrainians, just because they had a different point of view. This is even worse than nazism.
    3
  322. Putin can only afford an attrition war, that should be clear to everyone. That's why we didn't see the counteroffensive everyone was waiting for. Russia can barely keep up with the ammunition provisioning necessary by the current army. Now the situation is clear. One missile attack every two weeks or a month, because that's the time it takes to resupply stocks. And so with the artillery, the amount of shells Russia can restock is limited. I think Russia started to pile missiles, in fact they waited one month since the previous strike, instead of two weeks as usual. Putin can go on for a long time at this pace, and he hopes Europe will give up at some point. On the other end, Ukraine has the time to fortify new positions, so for Russia will not be easy to take Kramatorsk. I don't think the war will ever extend over Dnipro. It will eventually end in Dnipro. The river is too wide. To supply 1.5 millions men you would need to convert factories to produce weapons, like in ww2. Putin doesn't want to do that. Also Russia doesn't have Air Supremacy, because Ukraine still have too many anti air systems. So Russia can't employ its bombers to destroy the enemy lines, the only option is artillery. This is not going to change any soon. Also Russia cannot nuke using nuke shells, for three reasons: 1) we don't know if the shells do still exist; 2) if you nuke you cannot advanced through that territory; 3) the public opinion will not be happy. That's why Putin decided not to use nukes, and nukes will be used only if Ukraine tries something tricky in Crimea. So the only option for Putin is to continue this attrition war, doing his best to keep the economy afloat, in the hope Europe will give up its support. But as I said, this war just started. The war will not end with Bakhmut fall, it will continue.
    3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. 3
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. 3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. First of all, let's talk about the escorts. It's 2023 and most of them work on the Internet. There are plenty of websites where you can find call girls, all over the world. Some girls have pimps, but it's a minority. Where it's legal there are agencies, like in Germany or in the UK. In Italy, for example, agencies are illegal. Also, it is super easy for a girl leaving the pimp. They have just to tell a client their situation, and the client will arrange for them a way out. These girls, working in Vegas, are mostly freelance, they do not have a pimp, and they make a ton of money. It is 2023, and most of the attractive girls in the US can do camming and/or OnlyFans. Or they can do money on Twitch without getting naked. Escorts to that for money, because the pay is crazy. And some enjoy it, I know that for experience, since I have been with many all over the world. Pimps to exist, and certainly there are girls who are getting used, but those are the ones on the street, not the high level escorts in Vegas. Hot girls just need to open an Instagram profile, and they will receive in DM dozens of proposals a day, to travel abroad, etc. They do not need a pimp, it's 2023. Now, let's talk about the ex prostitute. She drives an expensive Lexus, runs an empty facility with government money, desperately trying to get one or two girls, just to show she is doing something. In the meantime she keeps getting an awful amount of money from the taxpayers to drive her Lexus. She definitely found her way to monetise her past. And now she is looking for private investors, not because she needs the money to expand the facility, that was empty, but because she likes the money. She is not an escort anymore, because she can't be. No one would pay to be with her.
    3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 3
  348. 3
  349. 3
  350. 3
  351. 3
  352. 3
  353. 3
  354. 3
  355. 3
  356. 3
  357. 3
  358. 3
  359. 3
  360. 3
  361. 3
  362. 3
  363. 3
  364.  @hansjorgkunde3772  I think all deaths have been always on Zelensky account, but his people support him, and they do with a punch of arrogance, and so much hate, so to speak. Many of them died, many others will before this war ends. How many it's hard to say, they will only surrender if they all get pinned down like it happened in the Azovstal factory. Whatever is going to happen, I don't think any good will come for the Ukrainians. Putin cannot afford to retreat, for two reasons: first he promised to protect the people of the Donbas, second he will lose his face in front of the entire Russian population, and he will have to resign. So, as last resource he will use nukes. But has to be done before NATO gets into the conflict, before Poland joins the conflict. US will not retaliate with a counter attack, after all Ukraine isn't in the NATO. I think the next 3-4 months will be crucial. I agree with what you said, but do not overestimate Russian forces. They do not have all those tanks, and yes, they potentially have a lot of men, but you need to equip and train them. I doubt there is so much equipment, so Russia needs time to go all in, probably more than one year. Russia spent a lot of resources in ICBMs and air defense systems, The USA on the contrary spend money for more general purpose equipment, because they are involved in so many wars. So Russia would be well equipped in a nuclear war, but its tanks are old and so it is most of the equipment. Anyway, we'll see what happens.
    3
  365. 3
  366. 3
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. There will not be any significative advancement till summer. With the injection of 300k soldiers, forces are now on pair. Russia will have to mobilise 500k more or even 1 million, but for that to happen Russia needs to produce and/or buy more equipment: rifles, uniforms, etc. Russia also needs more vehicles and tanks to support those units. Russia is clearly buying time, and whoever follows Scott Ritter or Douglas McGregor, well, they are both wrong. My bet is that this war may end up with two atomic strikes in Ukraine the next Autumn, if Ukraine manages to destroy the Crimean bridge and invade Crimea. And the strikes will be on Kyiv and maybe Lvov, not on the army. I don't see Russia capable to mobilise enough troops any soon, due to the insufficient production and the empty stocks. Russia never prepared for such a long war, they don't have millions of uniforms or even rifles. Not enough tanks either, or vehicles. Maybe Putin strategy is to hold the ground as long as possible, till Europe can't support anymore Ukraine, but this is risky, because it can also work against him. I guess will see, but do not expect anything significative this winter. Russia will not conquer half of Ukraine, we'll not see a major offensive, we'll not see an attack from multiple fronts. For that to happen, Russia needs 1 million more men, which is impossible to equip as of now. Russia certainly is now going full speed with the military industry, but it will take way more than 6 months to get what they need to equip so many people. Probably it won't happen at all. I do not think you can scale up Kalashnikov production fast enough. They were ordered 150k rifles in 2019, 50k per year. Imagine making 1 million in a year. It's just impossible. Maybe they can scale up to 100k or 150k, three times more, but they cannot scale to 1 million per year, it is just impossible. For that to happen you would need to be in ww2 mode, where all the people are involved. It's unlikely to happen. Russia primary objective is holding the ground long enough to have Ukraine on the negotiation table.
    2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523.  @stuglenn1112  I know that very well, this is clearly a proxy war, and the outcome will depend on how long and how much US and EU will support Ukraine. But things aren't looking good for Russia. Too many mistakes have been done by the Russian generals, tactical and strategic mistakes. No one really knows the truth about the casualties. But I want to remind you that Russia lost 18 millions of people alone, and axis lost between Japan and Germany just over 6 millions during WW2. Indeed allies still won the war. So the casualties aren't a great indicator, because Ukrainians are determined to fight till the last man, Russians are not, at least not at this stage of the conflict. If this war goes on the long run, let's say 2 or even 3 years, the outcome is unpredictable. US alone spent only 0.5% of the GDP to support Ukraine so far. That was enough, with a side contribute from Europe, to obtain major victories on the field and regain territory. Also Ukraine has a better intelligence than Russia, because they have Starlink, they can communicate coordinates between command posts very quickly. Allies equipment is, generally speaking, superior to the Russian equivalent. Russia invested a lot in nuclear weapons, because it's part of their doctrine and because that is a deterrent, but now they are fighting a conventional war, and S-500 or BrahMos don't provide any value. They tanks, the T90 don't stand a chance against the modern Javelins. T-14 Armata can't make a difference, because they have just a few. Also the number of tanks they have has been heavily overestimated. They barely have 3000 tanks, not 15000 like claimed on so many websites. I was thinking Russia could win easily, but now I am not sure anymore. These 300k men mobilised aren't going to be enough, because Ukraine will mobilise other men, that EU and UK will train. It's possible that Ukrainians will get Western tanks, like the Leopard, less likely jet fighters. We'll see what German will do, but we'll see how much pressure Europeans will put on their governments to put an end to the support. We'll see how the winter goes, the inflation, the gas and electricity prices. There are a lot of variables. Putin thinks he can win in the long run, but this could be another mistake, a fatal one.
    2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547.  @VediViciVeni  Ukraine just announced days ago another mobilization. I can assure they can mobilise easily 300k more men. What Russia did is not going to be enough. Russia needs more men, but I think as of now they don't have enough equipment. Not enough rifles, jackets, whatever is needed. There is simply not enough for 1 million, that's why Russia didn't mobilise 1 million. Russia wasted so much ammunition and tanks during this war, it's incredible. And the quantity of vehicles and tanks given to Ukraine is outstanding. They failed completely. No one can say that Russia did or it's doing good. They still didn't take Bakhmut after I don't know how many months. I though Russia could win this war easily, but now I am not so sure anymore. On the contrary, I start to think that Ukraine might win if US and Nato keep this level of support. Casualties are not relevant. Russia lost twice as much as Germany during WW2 but it won the war. A country like Ukraine can lose millions of soldiers before they give up. 2 millions at least. But at this pace it will take 10 years to get there, and Russia doesn't have all this time. Russia is losing all its military equipment. They just lost 4 ships on a single attack. They lost two pipelines to transport gas, the main Crimea bridge took a bad hit, and it will take 10 months to fix it. Russia is losing this war, it is losing the war against time. They thought they could take Ukraine in 15 days. As of now, Russian chances of winning the war are 50/50.
    2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. First of all, it is true not all the clients are mobile apps (but they can be), but in fact you don't use the same method. You generate the token when the client is indeed an app (Android or iOS, they do both have a keychain). When the client is the browser, you do store the JWT in a cookie, and you tie the cookie to the IP, so that a stolen cookie cannot be used outside your network. Unfortunately there is not other way around it if a client is the web browser. Sure, you can install the app on your phone, assuming you were able to hack the phone of someone else who has legit credentials, and you stole his private key from the keychain (very very very very unlikely), but the keychain you are using is related to the did, and the did (device ID) of your device is different, so the token that the app generates on your phone is invalid. You can push as much as you want, but generating the token on the client, when the client is a mobile app, is much more secure, especially if the mobile app is the only client you have. You cannot perform any attack, unless you steal the phone, and you pass the biometric, having full access to the device. Also this system ensures that a user can use his set of credentials on a single device, so that different users cannot share their credentials and pay for a single license, which is something you cannot do otherwise. I studied this stuff, I know what I am talking about. If I did the thing this way is because I deeply studied the subject. Maybe in the future, with WebAssembly, we'll have a way to make it work also inside the browser. Maybe it is already possible, I do not know. @marklnz 
    1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. No one will retaliate against a Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine, because Ukraine isn't part of NATO, so the Russians don't have much to fear. The only ones who could respond to Russia are US and UK, but they won't do that. People still can't understand that Ukraine has been used, but no one really gives a fuck about it. The US doesn't support Ukraine because cares about their people or its independency, US supports Ukraine because this war is destroying Europe and it's making Russia weak. Also, Moscow is the most protected city in the world against a nuclear attack. Russia deployed around Moscow the S-500 system, which is currently the most sophisticated defense system in the world. People complain about the state of the Russian army. Well, Russia heavily invested in nuclear, because nuclear is a deterrent. It is part of the Russian doctrine. Russia has the fastest supersonic missiles in the world, BrahMos, and they can carry nuclear warheads. Meanwhile the US nuclear counterpart is depleted, because US considered impossibile a nuclear war and invested on more traditional weapons, Russia continued to research and develop new and more advanced missiles, ICBMs and defense systems (S-300, S-400, S-500). There will be not a nuclear counter attack against Russia if Russia uses nuclear against Ukraine. Ukraine can't win, you all need to understand that. It's just a waste of lives, their lives, and our money. There is not a single chance in the world that Ukraine can win the war, not a single one. Russia will nuke all the major Ukrainian cities rather than losing the war. You all need to understand that. Ukraine military supports has to end now, immediately.
    1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. So in the Multiverse Theory there are billions of billions versions of myself, because every yoctosecond (Google yocto) a new version of me is generated, in that particular instance, forming two universes, so that there is a new version of me exist. By the time I finish this comment, there are infinite new versions of me, each one in a different universe. And also there is an infinite number of universes where I do not exist. So why should I live this one where my life sucks? Better kill myself every time I make a mistake, because, according to the Multiverse Theory, there is at least one universe where I do all it right. There is also one version where I live forever, till the end of the universe itself (one of the many versions), and I do become omniscient, maybe I become the universe myself, so I solve this dilemma for once and for all. If we assume the theory true, then this is, after all, possible, in a multiverse. Now, I don't like this idea, it doesn't make any sense. Whatever the String Theory predicts, my gut says it's wrong. The Universe is one, it has predefined rules, that our math can only partially describe. One day, maybe, we'll have a math that can describe the entire universe, but I am sure other mathematical theories will provide the same results, just like there are many ways to solve the same equations. Maybe even the String Theory, which is no more than a ugly framework. Oh, you can tell me I am wrong, in another universe, but if such a universe exists, I'll be the one to prove it (in another universe). I am sure I am right at least in one universe. This one. Check mate!
    1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. The food is NOT cheap in Thailand. If you eat Japanese, Korean, Italian, Spanish, French, you pay as much if no more what you would pay in Japan, Korea, Italy and Spain. Only Thai food is cheap. And you may like it, but I do not, I think it sucks, and it sucks bad time. It is too spicy. Vietnamese food, for example, is definitely better, if you are not into spicy food. Transport in Bangkok isn't so bad. You have MRT and BTS, with a number of metropolitan lines. Bikes are dangerous, because you will ride without helmet, and in Thailand they do drive fast. In Vietnam you provided with a crappy helmet, which is pretty useless if you have an accident, just because the police will stop you otherwise. Indeed in Thailand you can manage without a motorbike, but in Vietnam you cannot, you need to rent one. Vietnamese women look much better than Thai women, I agree. If you are into transgenders, Thailand is, of course, the number one spot in the world. If you are into women, in Thailand is anyway much easier to get laid for free. If you like to pay, then Thailand has more options, but the girls look better in Vietnam. In Vietnam people try to scam you way more often than in Thailand. Women lure guys into super expensive clubs, where a drink costs 50 dollars or more. Attractive girls you meet on Tinder, ask you to take them to these places, because they get a commission. Ho Chi Minh and Bangkok are two completely different cities. Bangkok is way more modern, and life is mostly concentrated around malls, massive shopping centres with huge food halls. Central Bangkok (Asok) is another world compared to Saigon (District 1). District 1 in Saigon is full of small alleys with a log of restaurants and micro shops, hotels, etc. The experience is not even comparable. Also Bangkok is more "distributed". Every neighbourhood has its own shopping mall, and if you want to experience the best nightlife you need to take a taxi and go to Khao San Road, meanwhile in Saigon it is all in District 1. Saigon is way more dirty than Bangkok, like 10 times more. Thai people are definitely friendly. Can't say the same for Vietnam. Vietnam is definitely cheaper than Thailand, but to live in Saigon you need to rent a scooter, because streets are not designed to walk around, and if you move, you need a motorbike.
    1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. No man, it's a matter of ignorance. We have been guided, here in UK, by a man who violated himself the lockdown because to a meet a married woman. His forecast was completely wrong. This, plus the poorly handled situation in Italy, scared Boris, who changed strategy. Now it's pretty clear Sweden was right. To me, is always been. Colleagues and friends know I have been said this, going against everyone, since this epidemic started. The problem is in the world there are just a few smart people and Tegnell is one of them. Most of the people are stupid, and they elect stupid people to represent them. And stupid people make stupid decisions. And it's really difficult for the average people have their own opinions, an opinion that is different from the one widely accepted. I have seen this between my friends when we were discussing the matter. Same with colleagues. But now people should just admit they were wrong. They had all the time to study the numbers and understand the only people who needed to be protected are the elderly. There is no need to lockdown the entire country to do that. You can protect the home cares, you can enforce the companies to make people work from home, when it's possible, so less people will use the public transport, and you can pay those people who lives with elderly ones, and can't work from home. You can protect them, and let the others living a normal life. Without fuckin up the entire economy. Reporters and journalists are the first responsible for this mass media disinformation. They terrorized people, they make us to believe we were all going to die, when most of the people are asymptomatic. Look at all the football players who tested positive and didn't have any symptoms. It's bad for old people only, this is now clear. And the mortality rate is just 2 or 3 times higher than a seasonal flu. You have all been fooled, and it's always hard to admit you are so stupid, but you are. As a matter of fact, I have been 2 weeks in Colombia, and I'm going to weeks in Brazil pretty soon. Most probably I will die because a terrorist will shot at me, but certainly I will not die because the virus. Take care.
    1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133.  @nunyabizay9253  because men like to get laid, so we also go for women we don't necessarily like enough to have a relationship. We usually decide in the first 10 minutes if we want to be with a woman or not. Then, a second test is sex. If we like a girl a lot and the sex is great, then we are more than happy to be in relationship with the girl. Both men and women want a partner that is out of their league. The difference is that men are usually ok to sleep with women who are in their league, or even below, just to get laid. I can tell you that if I find a woman I really like, out of my league, I'll keep her. But I can't find one where I live, so I get laid with women I do not like enough, and eventually I dump them. Women need to low their standards. Where I live my value isn't so high, but I know what means to have an high value. So I know what is like to be an attractive woman. I am white man, and in Africa I could match with every, and I mean every girl on Tinder, when in UK if I am lucky I match with a girl once a week. Lower your standard and you will find a man. Every day I go out I see at least one or two girls I would like to know and date, but these girls are definitely out of my league, unfortunately. And if they are not, they are just after my money. In fact, I will retire in a few years in a much cheaper country, where it will be much easier date a very hot girl. that's why men get girls from Thailand, South America, because our value there is way superior. If a woman can't get a man, she needs to lower her standards.
    1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. have been the only one, here on this channel and on Military Summary, to say that we were not going to see any Russian offensive. The reason is simple, and very clear. Russia tried multiple times to storm Ukrainian positions, but as you reported in your videos, it failed. In at least two occasions, I remember that Russia lost a huge number of tanks. To take Bakhmut, Russia used a ton of shells, and destroyed building after building. People are saying that Ukraine is running out of man, which is a total bullshit. Ukraine can go on for the next 2 years, if they keep losing between 600 and 900 soldiers a day. Ukraine will train and replenish an entire new army if that is needed. Greece is just going to end over to Ukraine its entire air defense system. We are talking about over 90 units. Ukraine is attacking, and in doing so, is losing a lot equipment and soldiers. I don't see why Russia should attack, when it is in a position to defend and destroy Ukraine waves or soldiers and tanks, one after the other. Ukraine is getting weaker every day, but is has still enough strength to attack. I am pretty sure in the moment we are speaking thousands of new recruits are trained in the UK and Poland. The new ones who will use Abrams, Challengers and F-16, another army, plus ton of new equipment that is still on the way. To attack Russia should mobilise, at least another 500,000 soldiers, and equip these soldiers. Also it should ramp up furtherly the production of shells, tanks and equipment. This would destroy the economy. Russia needs to hold another year and half, till the end of the new Presidential elections in the USA. Whoever is going to win, is going to end this war. It would not be prudent for Russia to attack, Ukraine is still too strong. Better grinding them down, day by day, and eventually, when they do not have nothing left, attack. It is not that time yet. You all hear Ritter and Macgregor saying that Ukraine is done. They said that for the first time more than one year ago. Well, it's not, Ukraine is not done yet. Ukraine is still strong. In addition, another war is about to start in Niger. Who is going to provide the equipment, the training, the ammunition? It is going to be Russia. Russia cannot afford to mobilise 500,000 men, necessary to start a counter offensive, supporting, at the same time, a war in Niger. But Russia has time, and Russia knows that things will change with a new US administration.
    1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250.  @seanniemeyer5437  I think the main issue is that Ukraine oppressed the pro Russians for years. You know, in my country we have some areas where the people do not even speak our official language, they do speak, mainly, the language of another country, and the majority of the people living at the border would prefer to be part of that country. Indeed my country managed to give them a certain level of autonomy, and privileges, so to speak, and this is enough to make those people happy. Ukraine should have done the same, but it was totally incapable. On the contrary, oppressed these people. Remember that, even though Russia provided Donbas people with military aids, the people are fighting, risking their life. You don't do that for Russia, you do that because you are tired to get oppressed, you do that because you want your own autonomy. I do believe in auto determination, not in sovereignty. Ukraine did its best to make this war happen, and now it is going to pay for the consequences. I can assure you - mark my words - that not only the Donbas will remain Russian, but that Ukraine will get destroyed, for the most part, if the war continues. The Russians are destroying the power supplies so the civilians will be forced to leave. And once there aren't civilians anymore, the Russians will annihilate the Ukrainian army. I don't know how long it will take, but Ukraine is doomed, no matter what. There is no hope for Ukraine. If Ukraine manages to conquer back the territories, which I strongly doubt, it will be nuked. Ukraine can't win, and the US administration knows this very well. They just want to prolong this war as long as possible to impoverish Europe, and possibly kill the German and the Italian industries, who cannot afford the high cost of energy. People, Ukrainians in particular, are so naive thinking they can win the war. You don't win a war against a nuclear power, you simply can't. This is not the Avengers that you can go back in time and revive half of the universe. Once you have been nuked, you are dead, and the war is over. I do understand patriotism but I do not tolerate stupidity. Zelensky, who is now considered a hero, will be one day seen for what he is: the man who sold his country to the United States and slaughtered his own people.
    1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307.  @jay64j  Those info are not available, you know better than me. Ukraine claims, Russia claims, no one knows the truth. But what I know is that I managed and worked with hundreds of programmers, and they didn't mobilize any. There are 200k programmers in Ukraine, plus a lot of IT personal. I can guarantee they can easily mobilize 300k more men. Very easily. And these are all people who did the military service. An IT guy can learn how to operate an HIMARS in a few hours, it's not rocket science. You don't need to be trained 10 years to drive a tank or shoot a gun. You are all overestimating training. UK and EU are training Ukrainians in thousands, constantly. The Soviet Union lost up to 12 millions soldiers during WW2, Germany over 5 millions. Ukraine has still a long way to go. People saying they don't have any more soldiers are wrong. What I can see if that Russia still didn't take Bakhmut. It has been months. And Ukraine conquered back a lot of territory. That's the reality, facts. Russia doesn't have enough men on the ground, and 300k will not be enough for a massive counter offensive. They need a million, at least, but they don't have enough weapons and equipments for 1 million soldiers. That's why they mobilized only 300k. They don't even have enough rifles, because they didn't plan for it. They wanted to take Ukraine in 2 weeks and they miserably failed, and they weren't ready for what followed. Also all these claims that Russian had over 15000 tanks, it's all bullshit. A YouTuber bought satellite pictures and counted them one by one. And you can see from the video posted where they move equipment, that Russians don't have so much stuff left. That doesn't mean they can produce more, and maybe that's the plan. The truth is Putin is a damn newbie and he doesn't know what to do, and his generals are bad as well.
    1
  1308.  @chadthundercock5532  1. Yes, that means Ukraine can still mobilise a lot of men, before it collapse, and the 300k Russians will not be enough. Just read yesterday that Putin wants to keep that open. I do not think he will stop the mobilization, because he can't. 2. No one is saying the army is derelict, but if it was far superior, we wouldn't be here discussing this matter. Russia made a ton of mistakes, and lost several battles. 3. Satellites are satellites. They take pictures, and if you want the update pictures you pay. The guy compared the old with the new ones to see what was available and what is still available. Much more reliable source than what you read on the military websites. Probably not even Putin knows how many tanks Russia has, because there is not such inventory. Companies can't even make an inventory of their computers, imagine if Russia can make an inventory of all his military equipment. Too many people involved, too much corruption, way too much disorganization. So I think it is more reliable counting the tanks, rather than believing in estimations done by "experts" and "analysts". Also, if you look at the videos published, and you sum up all the tanks moved by the trains, you can count a few hundreds, certainly not thousands. We do not know how many missiles Russia has, we do not know how fast they can produce any. What we know is that the production of Kalashnikov is far behind, and T-14 Armata production was triggered only at the end of 2021, so they can't have many, because the company who does the tanks said they will deliver 40 in 2023. In conclusion, Russia is not mighty as we were thinking, they don't have so many tanks, tanks have been proved ineffective because Javelins cost a fraction of the money and destroy tanks easily. Missiles are very expensive, and when you launch 50 missiles, and 35 get destroyed, you lost a lot of money. Ukrainian army has been destroyed once already, but if US and NATO keep supporting Ukraine, Russia will have the only option of Nuclear weapons. The point is, I am not sure if and when Russia can win this war with conventional weapons. At the current speed and with the troops employed it could take years. And we don't know what will happen to the economies in years. Will NATO, and in particular EU support Ukraine for years? Will Russian economy eventually collapse in the next two years? Will the conflict escalate further? We can't know.
    1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. I feel the pain. Travelled to Vietnam twice, three days the first time, second for one month and half. First time got scammed by a private taxi, paid five times what I would have paid with Grab. I am an experience traveller, and I knew this was going to happen, but it happen because I was with a Thai woman, who was a pain in the butt. If I was alone, I would have connected to the airport WiFi and use Grab. Which I did the second time. But it was not easy to find the car, it is utterly complicated, because if you do not have Internet, and you use just the airport WiFi, then you may lose connection, and like he said, it is not clear where taxi stops. I think the Saigon airport is the worst I have ever been, it is completely inadeguate to handle the traffic Vietnam has today. So I am glad another one is in construction, hopefully a modern one, with electronic checks. Do not buy a local SIM at the airport, it is a scam. A one month plan with 5 GB a day costs like 6/7 USD (for a month) in a Viettel shop. And mind that you can only pay with cash. Also, to avoid commissions use the ATM of TP bank. Vietnam is full of scams, so pay attention. Do not pay with other currencies, they will scam you. And yes, the airport is atrocious, and the queue at passport control can easily take two hours. Bare in mind that even when you flight back to your country, it is still going to take a long time to check your passport. Some people are friendly, other they just see you as a walking ATM. Sometimes, if you do not buy they speak Vietnamese behind you, insulting you. And some women have a terrible attitude, nothing like Thailand. I do not like to generalise, but I am not sure I will ever come back. The traffic is insane, and if you stay in Vietnam longer than two weeks, you are going to need a motorbike. Food is cheaper than in Thailand. If you are a tourist and you visit Saigon for just a few days (2/3 days are enough to visit the city) stay in District 1, but if you plan to stay a month, then Thao Dien is much better. The rest of the city is for locals. Good restaurants, shops, it is all in Thao Dien.
    1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415.  @nottoday3817  Ukraine has over 200k software developers, and they haven't been called to the army. just a few, not even the 1% for what I know. Plus there are a number of IT people that also haven't been called. They can easily find 300k people, I can assure you. They will all fight, 90% of Ukrainians are willing to fight, even women. They can find millions more. It's all about weapons and support. As long the country gets enough money from the US to run the basic services, weapons and military equipment, Ukrainians will keep fighting till the last man. This unless Russia overpower Ukraine so much that Ukrainians will lose hope. Will the Russians rebel when and if over a million of soldiers will be called to the army? Hard to say. In my opinion the outcome of this war is unpredictable. Russia isn't strong as everyone was expecting. Will the Russian war machine will gain traction over time or it will be depleted? Will the US and NATO provide tanks and other major equipment to Ukraine, stuff we didn't yet see on the field? Even aircrafts maybe? We don't know that yet. Russia didn't react to the British sabotage of the pipeline. It's clear it was the British, and also the British sunk the ships. Putin didn't do anything. Retaliate killing civilians. Kill a few thousands, target the British embassy. Then we'll see what the British will do. Putin is failing bad time, he is a pussy. He is too worried to be seen as a war criminal. He should do a nuclear attack on Lviv and Kyiv, destroying the cities. NATO will not respond with a nuclear attack on Russia to save Ukraine, because no one gives a fuck about Ukraine. Ukraine isn't part of NATO. The whole point of being a nuclear power is to deter the enemies to attack you. But the enemies are attacking Russia, since now Donbas is part of Russia. Putin needs to grow a pair of balls. Either you don't invade, either you win with any mean, and you use nuclear weapons. Russians are getting killed for no reason. You are in charge of the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world, and you are getting your ass kicked by a country who doesn't have anything. What is the point investing in a doctrine mainly based on nuclear weapons and ICBMs, if you don't use them when you need. Are you going to use them against UK And USA when you country is completely doomed and you don't have any other option? Use it now that no one will retaliate, and stop this war. Grow some balls Putin.
    1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. What are you talking about. NATO is already fighting the war against Russia. NATO is providing military aid, support, logistic, intelligente, satellites and even training to Ukraine. Ukraine is putting just the manpower. This is already a war between NATO and Russia, and NATO attacked Russia already. Nato blew up two submarine gas pipelines, NATO helped Ukraine to blow up a bridge in Crimea. NATO is a puppet in the hands of US, like it is Zelensky. This is a war between Russia and US, and it wasn't Russia to start it. NATO expanded far East and it shouldn't have done it. Ukraine signed the Minsk agreement in 2014, but then such a agreement has been violated shelling for 8 years the civilians in Donetsk. Ukraine didn't even have an army anymore at the end of the war in 2014. All the shelling has been done by the Azov Regiment, a group of nazies who was of course financed by the Ukraine government. For years the NATO, in particular UK, trained the Ukrainian troops. US admitted to have militaries on the ground in Ukraine. You might be in the Norwegian army, my cousin is in the army as well, he is a Colonel. He doesn't know anything, as well you don't know anything. This war could end tomorrow. Musk proposed a reasonable solution. But US doesn't want to end this war. Because this war it's not only affecting Russia, but it is destroying Europe. So it will not end, unless Russia demonstrates such a superiority on the field, that Ukraine can't stand the ground anymore. And mark my words: Russia will never accept a defeat, in the worst case scenario Russia will strike Ukraine with several nuclear attacks. Whatever is going to happen, if Ukraine doesn't seek peace, Ukraine will be destroyed. I repeat, mark my words and come back here to read what I wrote. You all.
    1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1