Comments by "Kathy Bramley" (@kathybramley5609) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

  1. 6
  2. Spitfire VBTROP It's a bit of both. I think isolation can be son powerful, and for those girls that sense of community looks wonderful. I don't think they're being warehoused. But I do identify with seeing that risk as well. I think "lower functioning" people are at greater risk potentially. Or the whole spectrum of autism and indeed meta of other differences and diff|ability, or indeed disability, will be misunderstood by public perception' viewfinder control, VT editing. There are some difficult questions but that doesn't make them less worthwhile. Registers for people with learning disability scare me in this worldwide political climate, but the intention as sold is to improve service provision. And get information to people. Get understanding too. But a racial register or similar is reacted against for the same reasons that might apply. Equality data is one argument or thing and a register another or is it. Really things should be set up to be a society friendly and open to understanding everybody at every point of contact from the get go. We won't get there immediately. It is hard to summarize and reach an upshot even where we share core values. Do we push through, sideline any attempt at registration or community or non integration as best we can!? Maybe it's more practical to start setting up underground railroads for autism, learning disability, all physical and sensory disability too, in advance. Or maybe find our Xavier and the crack teams of X-men to defend schools like this!!!???
    5
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. Race is a social construct but social constructs are how we interact with the world. That doesnt mean it's a scientifically accurate or helpful set of associated traits, terms and ideas. And culture isn't downstream of race, whatever that means. It's more complicated. Their cultural identity is British, as said near the start of the interview. For some populations - or ethnicities - perhaps they converted to a religion as a clan group, ethnicity, or have a largely tribal/ethnicity-speficfic religion - which is one reason why it's hard to seperate racism and religious hatred. And anyway? What is your concluding point, again!? Nobody is the same, within populations and between them, so what!? The nature of that difference is badly mythologised. Genetic diversity encodes all sorts of traits, broad-brush pigmentation categories tied with general geography don't make for general trait sets or sound correlations, neither do small data sets either. Within Africa there is more variation in skin colour & pigmentation than in the rest of the word put together, and diaspora communities, such as african americans are distinct again, but it's not directly tied to their pigmentation or representative of the nominal construct or group - but it is to do with variations of rare & specific muscle twitch genetics that are part of general variation, to the point that it's not a racial genetic characteristic by any means. Just a culutural phenmena that a few black people who are good at running do running.
    1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1