Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Garand Thumb"
channel.
-
5
-
2
-
@RS3Boomer
"bro look up more videos about this gun more good reviews than bad"
Quantity doesn't fix this issue and neither does your bad anecdotal claims, a gun shouldn't have function problems AT ALL, concerns regarding a firearm should be convenience but that thing can't even hold zero right, if I even have to fear the gun won't fire, the gun is already in the most evil and dangerous category it could be, its a waste of money for that alone. I would rather pay for a broken non-functioning gun over a gun I'm gonna be playing Russian Roulette with a burglar over. I don't care how many good reviews you find, the fact this happened at all makes me say Hi-Point needs to go bankrupt and everyone should be fired, nobody should offer a gun with this much lack of basic consideration for function. I don't care how cheap it is if I have to fear blood spilling because it failed to work with official parts.
"demoranch shot one with a gun and it chambered and fired still"
Anecdotes don't fix this and I don't care, it broke and failed for what is supposed to be the cream of manufacturer's crop. They should go bankrupt if this is what they're gonna let happen.
"Also yeah the firing pin ideally wouldn't break but I haven't encountered this issue with my rifle"
I don't care about personal anecdotes either, the risk was already great enough for Garand Thumb to suffer from this issue in a supposedly cherry-picked review, this means the gun is a literal hazard to everyone who buys it because it very well can just suddenly stop working and guess what? You don't get to collect on a money back guarantee when you're six feet under. And nobody is gonna pay the recompense they should for that either, someone will die and that blood is on the manufacturer's hands, if I were to see that happen I would seek for every single person responsible at the company to be dead as well because this is outright evil and deserves capital punishment, if you're gonna sell a product to someone for which they could never know would get them killed for using it as intended and then they die, you deserve to die no excuses. I pray to God that nobody has yet died over this but all it takes is one and I would seek the head of every person involved for the sake of justice and righteousness, you don't get free pass for something like this no matter your dumbass intent, the road to hell is paved with stupid intentions some "genius" thought was brilliant.
2
-
1
-
1
-
@RS3Boomer Its not an opinion (you don't seem to understand what an opinion is, qualified demonstrable facts and evidence aren't opinion of anyone, they're absolute objective irrefutable fact, unless you're willing to say Garand Thumb was intentionally loading false ammo into the Hi-Point which is the only way the video would contain any non-fact in it) when the thing outright doesn't work for a company provided review, its a literal fact that the gun was either broke or did not work after being on the range for almost no time at all as far as a gun is concerned. One failure is a problem, it doesn't matter how many times it functions, one failure means death, a million successes are irrelevant if someone dies, if someone can demonstrate something clearly failing inside what should be a clearly working zone for which someone could be killed, I will always hyper focus on that failure because PEOPLE WILL DIE OVER IT. The quantity of success is irrelevant and the fact you show no regard for the human life that is sacrificed over even a single failure of what should be a perfectly working gun within expected specs that's not even supposed to be out of pristine condition on this type of failure is a problem. You can have a million successes but if there is even one failure, someone dies, that's why I care.
1
-
@brentvanwie1961
"that's cute you act like every other firearm doesn't have bad examples"
That's at best a strawman, I never made this statement, in fact if you actually bothered to read what I wrote it be pretty clear that my opinion doesn't change just because its not Hi-Point, to paraphrase what I had literally said it was "if the gun has capacity to fail randomly and early it is worse in every way to a gun that straight up never worked in the first place" which if you even considered for a second you would see that such a generic statement doesn't just apply to Hi-Point and I would seek the execution of every company whose production firearms fails this test and gets someone killed. Its not cute, its consistency which you lack by ignoring anything that doesn't fit with your interpretation of things you couldn't have possibly seen because you make it up as you go.
"that in no way means every colt is a piece of shit"
Again, another strawman, I never said anything about every Hi-Point failing like this gun and neither would it have applied to any other company that doesn't commit the same problem. Thing is I don't care if any other gun succeeded, one capacity to randomly fail within a very legitimate normal range of expected use is a legitimate lethality problem for which should enable grounds for execution if someone dies over it. I'd apply this to every single product ever made, no need for safety regulations, no need for government quality assurance, no need for any government agencies and investigations by said agencies, all that needs to happen is for someone to say "if someone dies without an acknowledged certainly that they'd be very capable to die as a result of your service, product, or otherwise operation of property or former property, you and everyone involved will be executed and some of your funds may be extracted from your estate to pay for the victim's families". I'd say this to Colt just as much as Hi-Point, so you better absolutely make sure nobody dies or gets hurt by your product because if someone does you will have to pay and may even be executed for it.
"that's just one that is publicly available to view many guns and parts fail you've just been trained bet you won't stand in front of one while the trigger is pulled"
Failures should not be within normal operating procedures that lead a capability for someone to die, it should be expected by all products, in this case all guns, that if a part fails without clear pre-warning inside expected operating ranges every single drop of blood is on your hands and you should be strung up for that. No if, ands, or buts, justice says blood for blood so that vengeance may not be sought, that punishment may be swift and strict, that it would deter evil and keep man in check, without blood justice evil and lawlessness run rampant and death becomes the infatuation of society. Nobody should get away with negligence that gets people killed and you don't need an absolutist statist dictatorship to enforce that, its very basic to correct.
1