Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Colion Noir" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 1
  5. Gun laws only exist to restrict law abiding gun owners, to ensure those who would follow the law will always be put in harms way so that they will never threaten those in power, background checks are the biggest scam of them all, as is restriction of fully automatic weapons, weaponized vehicles, and explosive (or "destructive") devices, its not there to protect the citizen because a citizen can't be protected by the government ever, that's not the government's job and it is incapable of ever doing so, fact it puts citizens at more risk and harm then a citizen ever could put another at. All the government can really do is clean up the mess, in the rare case it catches someone that it claims would've broken the law it can't actually irrefutably prove without a shadow of a doubt that someone is guilty of a crime because the crime has yet to happen, it doesn't matter how implied the crime is, you can't prove a crime that has not been committed, pre-crime is not a crime. This is the core of "innocent until proven guilty", the devil's proof is not a capable argument to preserve innocence, but the inverse of the devil's proof is. It is up to the individuals and the community to protect one another and for the righteous threat of the law, not the act of the law, but threat of the law, to punish those who would seek to violate the law. The law must strike fear in those who'd become criminals and remove those who do not fear it from being a factor in the irreversible harm of others. A good government makes the guilty fear its punishment and the innocent love its justice. Any government that does not do this is tyrannical and must be exterminated. Also why is someone being tracked as a danger to society yet has total freedom to do anything so long as they just don't legally get a gun? Either they've served their time and thus are free of all requirements or they're still a danger in which case why the hell are they free? Background checks are a new invention, they're less than half a century old, all these mass shooters and criminality problems we have now are quite new, there is no association that an increase in gun laws decreases crime, violence, mass shooters, or gangs, in some cases the correlation has been quite the opposite, especially in recent years.
    1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8.  @pmritzen2597  "You’re full of it." You're the one promoting radical individualism over God's moral framework. Failure to inspire the full doctrine of God's truth in your children is parental failure. There is no respect to give to a parent that fails to inspire the good moral framework God gave us and then excuses his failures by saying "they think for themselves". Had you admitted otherwise I would have been instructed to say there is no fault among you but you have excused your failures to then get mad at me demonstrates who you really are. He who thinks for himself without the moral framework is acting in defiance to God and will be banished from Him if he does not repent, which means you have hated them, he who thinks on their own are dead in his sins, and carries nothing of worth among his values. "That’s the nice way I’ll put it." You blamed me for calling your failures out, that's not very nice. "You don’t know squat about my daughter." I know you definitely failed raising her because you excused yourself doing so. I also know that she has not a lick of rationality according to the foundations of her house nor a basis of the moral framework amongst her coming from you, and it is heavily implied she does not know of the necessary respect she should give to the authority of the men over her, which if true is a condemnation you put upon her. You have not shown her the necessary love, and your excusing of that says even that you are, whether knowingly or not, acting in hate for her. (Ezekiel 33:8) "And I don’t believe the same thing you do from the Bible." But what is true? I don't care for what anyone believes, he who believes his own truth leads only to death, never to life, for he can not be with Christ as he does not love even his own neighbor let alone his enemy. Christ requires acknowledgement of not "my truth" but of The Truth for He is. (John 14:6) If you can not accept that you can not be of Christ. Sola Scriptura, Scripture Alone, anything less gives no value to Christ but in fact worships that which is against Him, for it worships the self, its a worship of man, and will make you discerned from Him, given you do not repent out of your parental issues and treat your failures with excuse (that you lowkey admitted were failures) suggests that in the least you are not well versed among the theology necessary to understand what you believe in the first place. I do not care about your belief nor my own, I only care about what is true. Careful that you enter through the narrow door, for wide is the path to hell, for many take it. (Matthew 7:13) "I’ll leave it at that." These statements are a waste and insult to all good, not one good thing comes from such mentalities. All fights for the truth are to the death, no prisoners taken, no compromises made, for the Evil One makes compromise of God's Word to deceive us and drags into destruction, but Jesus does not allow a compromise. We the righteous children (not that we are righteous but have been made righteous by Christ's sacrifice) are behind enemy lines, we must tear down fortresses and strongholds to hold every thought captive to Christ. (2 Corinthians 10:5)
    1