Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Wendigoon" channel.

One thing is commonly reported among such cases when it gets brought up by the way, it stops and they flee at the name of Jesus. There is only one type of creature that innately ceases its act and flees under such conditions.
6
@helgenlane "I have no idea how witness testimony can be a viable evidence anywhere." Because you're conflating two completely unrelated concepts and fallaciously conflating them. Its two to three independent witnesses that corroborate the exact same details and don't conflict, it is quite impossible that two or more witnesses independently (as in have not interacted or been influenced by each other) would perfectly agree on any event at all unless it had happened. This is literally the reason cops will tell witnesses to never discuss a case together. Its more reliable then any other metric you can make because when it the events are off its logically self-refuting demonstratively, there is no other case of evidence that exists that is more reliable.
2
Do note Revelation refers to the Revelation of Jesus Christ, the singular Revelation revealed to the elect, not a collective of revelations that appear, it is not plural for that implies multiple ways, not a singular Revealed Way. (hence why its called Revelation)
1
Do note Revelation refers to the Revelation of Jesus Christ, the singular Revelation revealed to the elect, not a collective of revelations that appear, it is not plural for that implies multiple ways, not a singular Revealed Way. (hence why its called Revelation)
1
Jesus wasn't referring to Peter as being that foundation, He made it pretty clear that He was referring to the office of Apostles.
1
If we're going to quote the Bible for things, why was "why would God allow evil things to happen?" even left like that? Even as a hypothetical. Quite literally Jesus, Paul, and John (alongside many proverbs, psalms, and other OT verses) speak that man its unspeakably and irredeemably evil without Christ, so its just quite evident that nobody will not have the judgement of wickedness upon them, whatever the reason it was done for the sake of, the justification is "they deserve much worse". Paul is literally quoting the OT when he says in Romans 3 “None is righteous, no, not one;" There's plenty of things I'll take issue with here, I appreciate that you warned your usage of non-canon sources, but part of the issue I have with them is that many of them teach heretical and deceptive doctrines and traditions that oppose God, the apocrypha is about as close to correct as they get, and even many of them are dubious and wrong. Like Lilith did not exist, we know for fact that she did not exist and God would not have let her exist, her existence is demonstratively opposed to His nature. Many Catholic canons are also mistranslated, syncratic pagan adoptions, (a lot of named saints also fall into this category) or straight up baseless deceptions and superstitions. Another point I should speak on is that assuming what they meant by eyes is the same as what we see as eyes is an anachronistic interpretation, back then a stable shaped light would only be explainable as an eye to the people for no other object of the time could be described to appear in such a way, so in the least it is very likely that eye could be a conceptual mistranslation, not a literal one, but one for which they would have no explanation for an alternative in that time. Like say you showed someone of that time a television screen without context nor language to reference it, their descriptions would be strange and mangled is translated. Its often described that some angels use "chariots" as vehicles in the physical realm, for what is meant by that translation is also hard if not near impossible to describe for our eyes. Think of it this way, we could more readily describe an angel with modern words now than they could since we have more specific concepts capable of explaining aspects of them that was not shared in the past.
1
@notyourtypicalwaifu I have no idea what your reply means to say.
1
@notyourtypicalwaifu I have no idea what your reply means to say.
1
@notyourtypicalwaifu I have no idea what your reply means to say.
1
@notyourtypicalwaifu I have no idea what your reply means to say.
1
@florinivan6907 Dude the judge ruled in favor of Randy because entrapment by state agents is expressively and explicitly illegal and constitutional, are you dumb? The court case is a matter of public record, how can you be this braindead?
1
Do note Revelation refers to the Revelation of Jesus Christ, the singular Revelation revealed to the elect, not a collective of revelations that appear, it is not plural for that implies multiple ways, not a singular Revealed Way. (hence why its called Revelation)
1
While it sucks that such punishment had to happen because man is wicked, and judgement will be wroth upon every single man for the blood of every single death, their damnation shall fall upon them and God will have the justice and vengeance that's owed for vengeance is mine so saith the Lord, I should say that God seems to have also punished the Branch-Davidians for their heresy.
1