Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "SmarterEveryDay"
channel.
-
Two things:
1. I don't defend a flag, its simple logic, if I don't have faith, knowledge is worthless, but if I don't have knowledge, faith is still of value. Knowledge without faith has neither love nor morality. By faith I can know whats right and true while reflecting the attributes of the clearly higher meaning that is plainly obvious. So beyond the presupposition which determines my worldview which we all have and that neutrality is itself a myth there is no absolutely no case you can make for value in a knowledge without foremost something else giving value to that knowledge for which I cannot be the master over. (if we are masters over it then it is neither provably true nor objective and neither can be applied beyond that singular individual, making it a useless argument except for self-justification) Its as well not just a rational but an emotional argument, without this there is no beauty, goodness, or justice either. Science cannot supplant faith, it has to be informed foremost by faith. Your faith thus needs to inform origins, for history can only be known by observation and recording, there is no other objective metric to know history. Any presupposition of knowing history requires presumptions which you can't prove historically, only so claimed momentarily.
2. Irreducible mechanics disprove an incremental development for origins rationally, (as in order for incremental development to be correct, there must be absolutely no mechanics that can't be reduced) so if you can prove an irreducible mechanic at any point you can clearly demonstrate an impossibility for incremental development, there are numerous recognized examples in fact of this as well, like the human knee, peacock feathers, the eyeball, and the forms of flight for birds, in each of these cases none of the mechanics can independently serve a purpose and only function when unified in their entirety at the same moment, Darwin as well recognized this and said that should any case be demonstrated in the discovery of irreducible mechanics in biological systems it would nullify his entire hypothesis and that there would be no capacity to fix it.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1