Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Count Dankula"
channel.
-
234
-
43
-
39
-
31
-
29
-
22
-
11
-
11
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
@jackieman7033 As technology progresses, it always becomes easier, cheaper, and more reliable for the average person to get access to that technology. (not to mention in a capitalist society poverty always naturally decreases and prosperity always naturally increases, making the bar even lower) Cameras, TVs, computers, cars, video games, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. We have no capability to predict the future advancements in technology that'll enable us to do such things, we don't even have capability to accurately predict our sequential technological leaps. We are almost quite deliberately fabricating our perceptions of this topic on nothing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Didn't we since learn that Melody was a dude or something? Or was that a rumor?
Also the sex market has always been full of retards, prostitutes and sodomites getting offended over their inability to push the bar higher, especially when majority of the porn addicted masses that is the internet, is like entirely expected. When the only thing you have to contribute to society is your attractiveness and nothing else, you've already hit the bottom of the barrel, and of course the internet would be able to outperform camgirls, some of those dudes can't even get off to actual sex because of their porn addiction, a regular camgirl definitely isn't gonna do it for them. You know the funny thing about this situation tho is it highlights employee competition that a lot of people forget. Anyhow I don't care either way, tho I'd rather respect someone more for looking for some real stuff then the matrix trash. That applies beyond sex, lust is lower on the list, (tho it is somewhat important, dudes should want young women with good genetics and good health) and only after wedlock.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree with need to establish mitigation applications to address halting the gangs, but we also need to be hyper-strict with violence and murder, execution and brutality are effective deterrents for those who commit heinous acts, militarized police with hardcore hyper-brutal methods centralized and localized around the harshest and worse areas armed with guns would definitely be effective, executing murderers and attempting murderers with immediate conviction would also stop this. The threat needs to be extreme, strict, and ultimate, if a threat is not final, it'll never finish the job, and it violates justice and encourages vengeance for folks such as that to live. You ever wonder why so many people have become so strangely radical in the recent centuries, where so much media and even opinions justify harsh methods? Its because of vengeance, when you rob a people of justice, they return with vengeance, vengeance among mankind is just the absence of justice against wrongdoers.
1
-
As a Reformed Baptist (Calvinist Christian Baptist) we admit the existence of demons preying on man to occasionally claim to be ghosts of the dead, some mediums and psychics are given demonic powers, usually not many, but sometimes they do interact with demons, messing with the realm of things they don't understand, can't control, and that will destroy them, you open that door and there is no keeping it closed (without Christ, who they hate) and sometimes they practitioners will also prey on the desperate just as the demons do for they operate on behalf of demons, so they do as the demons do. These are not ghosts of the dead, but spirits of wickedness, princes of evil and destruction, wish only to deceive you, but they fear the name of Christ, they are enraged and flee in terror at the name of Jesus, it is not all cases, but not all spiritualism is false in the sense of a lack of supernatural acts, but only in what they call good or true, or that they be human, when those they may contact or be possessed by are in fact wicked evil spirits worse then any human could imagine, some who are more intelligent and cunning then any human could hope to be, some so ravenous and chaotic that it is impossible to even communicate the insanity, there is nothing comparable to both the cunning and insanity that these spirits, who occasionally may show up may possess, but if you are in Christ, they cannot harm you and at His name, the name of Jesus, they will always flee.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
God says let vengeance be His, and I agree as its what God said, but that doesn't mean justice should not be taken in a case of known violations of justice regarding the innocent, God's standard has rapists, molesters, and murder executed without a bar on any of it, cases of sexual groomings and other known sexual manipulation of a child should be at least castrated, I don't agree that someone should go out looking for people to do this too nor do I agree with going after someone post-conviction (least without evidence of those said violations and respective result for those crimes and a form of organization) but I don't say God disagrees with organized reasonable vigilante acts, most specifically to protect the innocent, when the governing authorities fail to do so. For government isn't the only authority regarded to us, and there is no establishment that opposes the formation of authority for the sake of justice and innocence, so long as it seeks to only ever absolutely punish the wicked, blood is on its hands if it enacts such acts on anyone that is innocent.
1
-
@todydn Eh, not really, a good governing authority cares and looks out for the rights of his people, that was what God gave governance for. But mankind always corrupts this for he hates good and loves evil, and thus he takes their rights for power, a good lord should be the governance that cares about his people's rights to the bitter end, willing to die for their sake for that was his divinely placed role, and the divine role of the men under him are to support him in that. All citizens are to support a just governance and a just governance protects the right of the citizens, even against itself. But when both sides are evil and corrupt as they are this does not happen and rights are lost. Woe to those who allowed these things, for judgement comes, and it comes to baptize us in fire.
1
-
1
-
@jazzy4830
"My guy, drop the "divine right of kings" shtick. They weren't appointed by God because they were superior,"
Strawman argument, never once claimed they were superior. A superior can not reign on Earth for no man is good but all are wicked.
"And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone." - Mark 10:18
"All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” - Romans 3:12
God put the kings upon the Earth to do His judgement, to represent His righteousness. All kings have been anointed by God by their appointment.
“I, wisdom, dwell with prudence, and I find knowledge and discretion. The fear of the Lord is hatred of evil. Pride and arrogance and the way of evil and perverted speech I hate. I have counsel and sound wisdom; I have insight; I have strength. By me kings reign, and rulers decree what is just; by me princes rule, and nobles, all who govern justly." - Proverbs 8:12-16
"Daniel answered and said: “Blessed be the name of God forever and ever, to whom belong wisdom and might. He changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings; he gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding;" - Daniel 2:20-21
"Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me." - Matthew 28:18
"they were just lucky that their ancestors managed to claw their way into some power and hold on to it for enough generations."
According to God that is not the case. For God put them there. And God kept them for that purpose and used them to judge the nations for which they ruled over. It is not for the kings that which made the problems upon the Earth but for the people who had done such evil for which the kings were sent to judge them. The kings shall be judged just the same but as it was said, even what we mean for evil God will use for good.
"As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today." - Genesis 50:20
"And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose." - Romans 8:28
"At that point you'd be better off starting your own group but honestly the last thing this country needs is another group of belligerent armed nutjobs with a misplaced sense of righteousness."
God gave us the right to our defense and weapons so that we may defend ourselves. Our lords were put over us so that we be given such a defense in the law just as we are to have one in the body. Instead we have made guilty the innocent, that motivation could be put guilt upon a man for which he must use evidence to oppose. This is not justice for God had told us just how to structure the court, that no man be laid blame unless there be no doubt in his guilt by evidence provided. It is then to the defense who only then would they be guilty before such evidence that they need to provide evidence to the contrary, only then. No man is to be convicted except by the account of two to three witnesses by the law of God.
"And he said to them, “When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one. For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors.’ For what is written about me has its fulfillment.” And they said, “Look, Lord, here are two swords.” And he said to them, “It is enough.” - Luke 22:35-38
And God requires that death be given to those who incite the law to judge them guilty of murder or rape. No judgement is to be given except for the absolute, there is no compromise amongst the law of God.
"On the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses the one who is to die shall be put to death; a person shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness." - Deuteronomy 17:6
"This is the third time I am coming to you. Every charge must be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses." - 2 Corinthians 13:1
"Also pretty sure Jesus said to follow the law "Render unto Caesar" and all that."
You don't get to perform eisegesis of the text. Your interpretation shall not be made for it is wrong.
"And they sent to him some of the Pharisees and some of the Herodians, to trap him in his talk. And they came and said to him, “Teacher, we know that you are true and do not care about anyone's opinion. For you are not swayed by appearances, but truly teach the way of God. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not? Should we pay them, or should we not?” But, knowing their hypocrisy, he said to them, “Why put me to the test? Bring me a denarius and let me look at it.” And they brought one. And he said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” They said to him, “Caesar's.” Jesus said to them, “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” And they marveled at him." - Mark 12:13-17
Does it not say quite clearly that the law established is the law to be followed? For Caesar's rule is to be Caesar's but God's law is to be in according to God. In this we are established to grant authority to those who rule upon us as they were established for our sake. But they are not God for they were established above God but below. To this a king is to be placed a judge upon the people and the people are to demand justice from him. Instead you demanded the death of your kings and trade them in for whatever was right in your own eyes.
"In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes." - Judges 17:6
This is an affront to God for no justice can be had. A king is established over the people for the people, if a king does what is not his duty to punish the wicked and reward the righteous he is not to be overthrown but to be put before God so that he be replaced. For a king is to be set over the people. If he comes to take what is not given for him then you are to peacefully oppose him, if he sets violence upon you then you shall pray before you set out in defense of your property. In this we are to defend ourselves not to destroy the king and his kingdom. Instead we are to establish a new king for the old had lost the righteous will to rule. Just as Saul had lost the right to rule to David, so shall the kings of all ages who profane God be put out for those who will be righteous before Him.
"Honestly if you are just looking for some to be a virtual cuckhold to an aristocratic in some feudalistic class-based role play, all power to do it on your own, Maybe you can get married just so that you can offer your lord the right of "prima nocta" in a bootlicking display of loyalty."
That is not given to my Earthly lord, aristocracy is not a rule from God. But hierarchy is as is submission, I am not loyal to a man who does not defend me but the one who teaches to fight and live shall have my respect more than any man. This is what my father of Earth has done, and it is the will of my Father in Heaven. It is by this will that our lords are to do much the same. I will not bow before a king nor be made to disgrace myself before him for he is not superior. If he demands such things I shall rebel, foremost peacefully, but if attacked then violently, not to destroy him but so that a king that does represent God stands above me in Earthly lordship. All men are given their purpose and to each is put in his place for said purpose, to those who I stand below in rank and there shall be a day that there be those who stand below me in rank, to each I am to love them in all that I do, even in opposition.That is what God has given us to do. For love comes before all other values.
"If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love." - 1 Corinthians 13
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A man right about many things is incorrect about the problem, technology being corrupted to destroy nature is merely a symptom of a wider problem and this is not the first time such things have happened, it is merely the latest and greatest period so far. (that we know of) The problem is the nature of man itself which is insidious, evil, corrupted, wicked, and destructive, it seeks nothing good and only wishes to do evil, it has no good intention for it is incapable of its own volition to make a choice of righteous or just act. (for which Ted has demonstrated himself for he is not a character of decent moral standing) In these things, it is mankind who has always been the problem, not that he is a problem that can be removed for that never produces good, but he is a problem because he is corrupted and corruptive to all he touches when he lacks a objective standard above himself, for when he values a higher purpose only then do such things become resolved but he is incapable of himself to do such this. For then what is to give us justification in our own flesh to have us resolve this?
It is Christ, the Son of God, Jesus who hath sacrificed Himself for all those who would believe in Him. It is by Him that science and technology as we can ever understand of it that was gifted to us for the sake, originally, of understanding Him. Without Christ there be no reason to reason about the world in discovery, for the world itself is not to be understood and for which being understood achieves nothing of value. We know of these things for we seek purpose and meaning to our lives but for which there is none unless we knew what it is we are called to do, we worship but understand not why. This is in fact a suppression of the truth, for we know this truth in our hearts but we are unwilling to be convicted by it out of fear and hatred and thus drive ourselves insane against our Maker. This is a source of many evils, it is the source of ravenous opposition to God and the source of ravenous denial under the guise of ignorance. (whether it be conscious or not, it is known) All of Creation is the evidence of the Creator itself, as it cries out for Him, it demonstrates and speaks to His Glory, it is for that reason it was ever to be studied, for it demonstrates His Nature that we may build a relationship better with Him. But due the evolution of Lucifer's system accept by the sons of wickedness and the ignorant alike, atheism was given a rise, an ideology of faith that claims to reject faith and yet claims to retain the reasons for needing to understand the world for which the faith itself justified. It is such a strange idea, that one should desire to know and solve the world's problems but rejects a necessity in itself to do such a thing. That is what the system bred, starting in part with the creation of public schooling, for it separated the work that the mother must give to her children to raise them properly, and for the father to teach them with her properly. Without a mother taking care of her children and the house, she lost much purpose, with the expansion of schooling her children were robbed from her and she was made a practical childless widow by the grueling work that her children were no longer able to perform in assisting her. Then came the time when tooling made her job easy and she no longer had any purpose at home anymore and all of sudden she got ideas, despising her husband and children for the things they did, her children no longer being under her authority either, now she had little reason to live in this world for her husband did not care nor love her and her children no longer looked up to her. In this she was driven to find another meaning, and this is feminism, the growth of an rampantly dangerous ideology that promotes female domination over men (whether it claims otherwise, it despises man's authority and claims itself to be higher, violating God's order) and thus she entered the workforce and justified voting, but for such things which she is rather incapable to manage well for she can not even manage her own house. It is just as much the man's fault as it is the woman's but she is to blame for the thoughts that enter her head without regulation that bring her utter destruction. By all this came the many mentalities that have been produced today, while not all spawned from feminism, Marxism being the most relevant of this day, it is thanks to feminism that it has been given new life, for with feminism opened the door to the destruction of irrefutable sexual differences declared and praised by society that ever grows towards a progress of the anti-sex mentality. First came the destruction of feminine roles in society, (women can be and vote for leaders, and get jobs in society with men) then came the destruction of female submissiveness, (you will find single motherhood here) then came the destruction of femininity in whole, (abortion acceptance and motherhood are erased here) which opened the door to the first destructive act of homosexual social acceptance which opens the door to all forms of degeneracy which also includes transgender/transsexual mentality, which is itself an insanity that encroaches only further as it can never be sated. This is why you will notice that mankind ever moves towards "progress" madly without regulation even when we know the chaos it brings, some may be left but those who drive society are always held in the fold for they are the ones put into such positions.
1
-
There is no "Trump" to stop these things and neither would a "Desantis" correct it, even perhaps they step on the brakes for a time, they don't disengage the car heading for the cliff, for they do not know the problem's root and believe in the root problem as if it were a religion still. Who amongst such figures has rejected feminism saying "women are to always be under the authority of a man, they should have no leadership over men"? None for they do not share good moral truths that would conflict with society who is ever pushing us towards this chaotic end. Would you wish for it to end you must be willing to abandon the notion that women and men should be treated as equal in all but moral value, women are to be treated as more precious, that they should be given more delicate consideration, men should provide a defense and stand not by the side of women but in front of their women that they should defend, guide, and love them. This does not say to make women a slave, nor does it say women are to be treated harshly nor in abuse, nor does it say to treat them as though they must be well sheltered from reality in its entirety, no these are not loving ways for which I am being guided to say. Instead what I say to you men is that in marriage that you give yourself in body as ownership to her as she will do to you, and in doing so you guide her away from wrong and wicked ways, that you inform her while you stand beside her so that she may not be tempted nor deceived. In this we must be better then Adam that we do not let our wives instruct us in what we must do but that we listen and reason for what she says whether it is a good idea, do not apologize for a lack of wrongs done to her, do not appease her for things that she is not correct on and do not conform to her instructions but reason what she requests. For she must request and respect you, she is not to make demands but must understand that she is under you, and you must understand that you are over her for her sake, so with this know that you must treat her lovingly and with a respect, do not be harsh that she would become discouraged or spiteful but treat her kindly and well. Know that you are more responsible then her for you have an authority over her for her sake so you must respect this authority you have been given. In all this she should be brought back as the wife to take care of the home and children and to promote and partially represent your family among the community, the children are not to be away from the house but to be in it under instruction, nor by a screen nor by a school but by the mother herself. If any education be necessary the mother foremost should be taught to instruct her children, not for the children to be forced upon by such a system for what instruction can a child receive if not by their parent? None for no other authority comes before a parent. In time the children will be given education, instruction, and introduction to the wider world by their father under experience, and through all this they need be taught the necessary skills by the parents to live. By this children will be promoted and the good life will become prominent among the elect so that they may become elect earlier and those not of the elect will benefit by being under a much familiar instruction that they should almost be like the elect. This would breed a healing in society and overthrow the corrupt Republicanism (not Republicans for which themselves are corrupt but I do not speak of the party when I say this) in part. (though not completely for a republican government may only be saved in blood and fire by its expedient execution) In all these things it will be found the right way to have society and all the problems of poverty, crime, and degeneracy would not be solved but greatly reduced to a degree regulated by moral men socially and not by government. For it is not the authority of the government but of the community itself. The first part however is from the men and women that they adhere to these practices, not that I say they would benefit well without God but should they fail ever to love God they may be less judged in this life. (however I warn not in the coming life, abandon everything to serve Christ else you will face a fate worse then Hell) I do not say this for the sake of saving society for I care not whether it lives or dies, I say this for the sake of your election that you may be brought to Christ and should that not be found, that you would in the least recognize Christ's instruction to you that you follow it well enough that perhaps one that it should be found in you. It is the only way to save the lives of this world from too much more of the horror.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1